Abstract
This study used cross-sectional data from the 1994/95 National Population Health Survey (NPHS) in Canada. The objective of the study was to examine the relationship between several established correlates of health status in the general population and the Health Utilities Index (HUI), a multidimensional, preference-based measure of health status. Analyses were carried out separately for the English-speaking (n=9,853) and French-speaking (n=1,519) respondents. The index correlated strongly with selfratings of health status and functional disability and varied as expected according to age, sex, and income. Subjects classified to different categories of chronic conditions reported different levels of health, as predicted. The HUI was also associated with the use of drugs and recent history of hospitalization. No major differences in the findings were observed between the two cultural groups. The results should be treated with caution due to the cross-sectional design and other methodological limitations of the study.
Résumé
Cette étude est basée sur un échantillon de données provenant de l’Enquête nationale sur la santé de la population de 1994–95 au Canada. L’enquête avait pour objectif d’examiner la relation entre divers corrélats acceptés pour l’état de santé de la population en général et de l’Indice de l’état de santé (IES) qui est une mesure multidimensionnelle de l’état de santé basée sur la préférence. Les analyses étaient effectuées séparément pour les personnes interrogées anglophones (n = 9 853) et francophones (n = 1 519). L’indice correspondait nettement aux autoévaluations de l’état de la santé et de l’invalidité fonctionnelle et, conformément aux attentes, différait d’après l’âge, le sexe et le revenu. Comme prévu, les sujets classés dans des catégories différentes d’états chroniques signalaient des degrés de santé différents. L’IES était également associé à l’usage de médicaments et aux hospitalisations récentes. Aucune différence majeure n’a été constatée entre les deux groupes culturels. Les résultats devraient être traités avec prudence étant donné qu’ils étaient basés sur un échantillon et que l’étude avait d’autres restrictions méthodologiques.
References
- 1.Wolfson MC. Social Proprioception: Measurement, Data, and Information from a Population Health Perspective. In: Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR, editors. Why Are Some People Healthy and Others Not? The Determinants of Health of Populations. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter; 1994. pp. 287–316. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Erickson P, Kendall EA, Anderson JP, et al. Using composite health status measures to assess the nation’s health. Med Care. 1989;27:S66–S76. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multiattribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res. 1982;30:1043–69. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.6.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences - I: Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:345–54. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: Types of validity and the Index of Well-Being. Health Serv Res. 1976;11:478–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702–22. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Furlong WJ. Health Utilities Index. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Press; 1996. pp. 239–52. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boyle MH, Torrance GW, Sinclair JC, et al. Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1330–37. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198306023082206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cadman D, Goldsmith C, Torrance G, et al. Final Report to Ontario Ministry of Health. 1986. Development of a health status index for Ontario children. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr RD. A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clinical Oncology. 1992;10:923–28. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.6.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Costet N, Le Gales C, Buron C, et al. French cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Utilities Indexes Mark 2 (HUI2) and 3 (HUI3) classification systems. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:245–56. doi: 10.1023/A:1008830115246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:79–93. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00296-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mathias SD, Bates MM, Pasta DJ, et al. Use of the Health Utilities Index with stroke patients and their caregivers. Stroke. 1997;28:1888–94. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.28.10.1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whitton AC, Rhydderch H, Furlong W, et al. Self-reported comprehensive health status of adult brain tumor patients using the Health Utilities Index. Cancer. 1997;80:258–65. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970715)80:2<258::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index - Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:249–57. doi: 10.1007/BF02260864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grootendorst PV, Feeny DH, Furlong W. Does it matter whom and how you ask? Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the Ontario Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:127–35. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00314-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gold M, Franks P, Erickson P. Assessing the health of the nation. The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health. Med Care. 1996;34:163–77. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199602000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ontario Ministry of Health. The Ontario Health Survey 1990: User’s Guide Volume One Documentation. 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Statistics Canada. General Social Survey (99); Public Use Microdata File Documentation and User’s Guide. Ottawa: Ministry of Industry Science and Technology; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Statistics Canada. NPHS Public Use Microdata Documentation. 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wolfson MC. Health-adjusted life expectancy. Health Rep. 1996;8:41–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Berthelot J-M, Roberge R, Wolfson M. The calculation of health-adjusted life expectancy for a Canadian province using a multi-attribute utility function: A first attempt. Calculation of Health Expectancies: Harmonization, Consensus Achieved, and Future Perspectives. 1993;226:161–72. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roberge R, Berthelot JM, Wolfson M. The Health Utility Index: Measuring health differences in Ontario by socioeconomic status. Health Rep. 1995;7:25–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mittmann N, Kostas T, Risebrough N, Liu BA. Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:369–76. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Federal, ProvincialTerritorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. Statistical Report on the Health of Canadians. Ottawa: Health Canada, Statistics Canada; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Statistics Canada. Report of the Canadian Health and Disability Survey (1983–1984) Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, Catalogue 82-555E; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hamilton MK. The Health and Activity Limitation Survey. Health Rep. 1989;1:175–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nagi SZ, Marsh J. Disability, health status, and utilization of health services. Int J Health Services. 1980;10:657–76. doi: 10.2190/81FB-J0X4-R9EY-06PV. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pope GC. Medical conditions, health status, and health services utilization. Health Serv Res. 1988;22:857–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Martin J, Letzer H, Elliot D. The prevalence of disability among adults. OPCS Survey of Disability in Great Britain. London: HMSO; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37. doi: 10.2307/2955359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rosholm JU, Christensen K. Relationship between drug use and self-reported health in elderly Danes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53:179–83. doi: 10.1007/s002280050359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Revicki DA. Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures. Med Care. 1992;30:MS274–MS282. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Katz JN, Phillyps CB, Fossel AH, et al. Stability and responsiveness of utility measures. Med Care. 1994;32:183–88. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199402000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chancellor JVM, Coyle D, Drummond MF. Constructing health state preference values from descriptive quality of life outcomes: Mission impossible? Qual Life Res. 1997;6:159–68. doi: 10.1023/A:1026494218030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H. Gender differences in health: Are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(4):617–24. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00335-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Verbrugge LM, Wingard DL. Sex differentials in health and mortality. Health Matrix. 1987;5:3–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. PatVariations in population health status: Results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316:736–41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Provisional Health Index for the Ontario Health Survey. Final report to Statistics Canada of Project 44400900187. Hamilton: McMaster University; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, et al. Multiplicative multi-attribute utility function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) system: A technical report. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Paper 98-11. Hamilton: McMaster University; 1998. [Google Scholar]