Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2001 Nov 1;92(6):448–452. doi: 10.1007/BF03404538

The GirlPower Project — Recreation, BC Health Goals and Social Capital

Joan Wharf Higgins 1,✉, Nancy Reed 1
PMCID: PMC6980055  PMID: 11799551

Abstract

‘GirlPower,’ a participatory action research project, explored how participation in recreation might contribute to the achievement of BC’s Health Goals and nurture social capital. After identifying their health issues, up to 43 young women participated in recreational activities for 10 months, gradually taking responsibility for the planning of the weekly sessions. Data collection methods included weekly participation rates, two surveys to measure self-perceptions and health habits, focus groups with participants to assess needs and as a process evaluation tool, a qualitative summative evaluation with participants, key informant interviews with staff, a journal kept by the project leader and fieldnotes of researchers’ observations. Quantitative findings did not support the propositions that the project contributed to the health of participants. However, analysis of the qualitative data suggests that GirlPower participants emerged from the project with a better sense of control over their lives and feeling more connected to their community.

References

  • 1.British Columbia. Provincial Health Officer. Health Goals for British Columbia. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, Prothro-Stith D. Social capital, income inequality and mortality. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(9):1491–98. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.87.9.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Health and social cohesion: Why care about income inequality? Br Med J. 1997;314:1037–40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lomas J. Social capital and health: Implications for public health and epidemiology. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(9):1181–88. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00190-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Putnam RD. Bowling Alone, The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The Benefits of ParksRecreation . A Catalogue. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Parks/Recreation Association; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.The Benefits Catalogue. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Parks/Recreation Association. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Herchmer B. Determining benefits and outcomes in recreation. Parks Recreation Can. 1997;54(6):14–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Henderson KA. The changer and the changed: Leisure research in the 1990’s. J Applied Recreation Res. 1993;18(1):1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Searle M, Brayley R. Leisure Services in Canada: An Introduction. State College, PA: Venture Publishing; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kraus R. Leisure in a Changing America. New York, NY: MacMillan College Publishing Company, Inc.; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.National Recreation Statement. National Conference of Ministers Responsible. 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Henderson KA, Grant AE. Parks and Recreation. 1998. Recreation programming: Don’t forget the girls; pp. 34–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rutman D. Profiles of Youth Well-Being. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Labonte R. Community empowerment and leisure. J Leisurability. 1996;23(1):4–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mechanic D. Issues in promoting health. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:711–18. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00399-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Posavac C, Carey RG. Program Evaluation Methods and Case Studies. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Children’s Commission. The Youth Report. 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carmichael D. Programming for self-esteem: Considerations for community leaders in recreation, sport and education. Parks and Recreation Canada. 1997;54(6):16–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hyndman B. The Use of Social Science Theory to Develop Health Promotion Programs. Toronto: Centre for Health Promotion/Participation; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jackson S, Baron V, Cleverly S, Dixon J, Ferguson J, Jackson L, et al. Public Health Practitioners’ Perspectives on Empowerment: Definition, Strategies and Indicators. North York, ON: North York Community Health Promotion Unit; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brown C. Social work education as empowerment. In: Chamberlain E, editor. Change and Continuity in Australian Social Work. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lord J. Personal empowerment and active living. In: Quinney HA, Gauvin L, Wall AET, editors. Toward Active Living. Windsor, ON: Human Kinetics; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McCarron G, Tenenbein S, Hindley P. Communication, Belonging and Health. In: Hayes M, Foster L, Foster H, editors. The Determinants of Population Health. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Riger S. What’s wrong with empowerment? Am J Community Psychol. 1993;21(3):279–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00941504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wallerstein N. Powerlessness, empowerment and health: Implications for health promotion programs. Am J Health Prom. 1992;6:197–205. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-6.3.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Searle M. Recreation Canada. 1990. Empowering the citizen: Advocacy for recreation and parks; pp. 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lord J, Hutchison P. Empowerment, disability and the community context. Rehabilitation Digest. 1997;27(2):13–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lord J, Hutchison P. The process of empowerment: Implications for theory and practice. Can J Mental Health. 1993;12(1):5–22. doi: 10.7870/cjcmh-1993-0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Haggard LM, Williams DR. Self-identity benefits of leisure activities. In: Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson GL, editors. Benefits of Leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sheilds L. Women’s experiences of the meaning of empowerment. Qual Health Research. 1995;5(1):15–35. doi: 10.1177/104973239500500103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Raphael D. Public health responses to health inequalities. Can J Public Health. 1999;89(6):380–81. doi: 10.1007/BF03404078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Youniss J, McLellan JA, Yates M. Am Behav Scientist. 1997. What we know about engendering civic identity; pp. 620–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Putnam R. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. Am Prospectwww.prospect.org/archives/13/13putn.html
  • 36.Wilkinson RG. Unhealthy Societies. London: Routledge; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Battle K. Incomes and outcomes. Can J Public Health. 1999;90(6):366–67. doi: 10.1007/BF03404135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Harper J, Neider D, Godbey G, Lamont D. The Use and Benefits of Local Government Parks and Recreation Services - A Canadian Perspective. Executive Summary. University of Manitoba: Health, Leisure and Human Performance Research Institute; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.National ParksRecreation Association. Parks and Recreation …The Benefits are Endless. Arlington, VA: National Parks and Recreation; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ward J. The John Innes Outreach Project: A Study of Recreational Needs of Homeless and Recently Homeless People. Toronto: City of Toronto Department of Parks and Recreation; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haldane S. Parks & Recreation Canada. 2001. Scientific research supports recreation for children living in poverty; pp. 40–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Frisby W, Fenton J. Leisure Access–Enhancing Recreation Opportunities for Those Living in Poverty. Vancouver, BC: JW Sporta Limited; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cato B, Chen W, Rainford N. Parks and Recreation. 1999. WISE-UP: Successful prevention project; pp. 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Reid D, van Dreunen E. Leisure as a social transformation mechanism in community development practice. J Applied Recreation Research. 1996;21(1):45–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alberta Community Development . Alberta Environmental Protection and Cities of Calgary, Edmonton, Lethbridge and Red Deer. Alberta Recreation Survey Analysis. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ontario Ministry of Culture . Tourism and Recreation. Recreation Research. 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.McKay S. Research findings related to the potential of recreation in delinquency intervention. Trends: Parks, Practice, Program. 1993;30(4):27–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Michalos AC, Zumbo BD. Public services and quality of life. Social Indicators Res. 1999;48:125–56. doi: 10.1023/A:1006893225196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tindall B. Parks and Recreation. 1995. Beyond ‘fun and games.’; pp. 86–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Harter S. Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. University of Denver. 1988. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES