Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2000 Nov 1;91(6):418–422. doi: 10.1007/BF03404820

Child Care Arrangement and Preschool Development

Teresa To 14,24,✉, Suzanne M Cadarette 14,34, Ying Liu 14,24
PMCID: PMC6980074  PMID: 11200730

Abstract

Baseline data from the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth were used to evaluate the associations between child care arrangement and poor developmental attainment (PDA). A weighted total of 521,800 children aged 2 to 3 years were studied (N=2,709). PDA was assessed by agestandardized motor and social development score. Children were grouped by the predominant type of arrangement: care by someone in the child’s own home, in another home (family child care), at a child care centre, or none (child care exclusive to parents).

Controlling for socioeconomic status, biological factors and maternal immigration, family dysfunction, hostile parenting and low neighbourhood safety were correlated with PDA and positive parent-child interaction decreased the odds of PDA. Whereas centre child care arrangements were beneficial to development overall (OR=0.41, 99% CI=0.18, 0.93), an interaction existed between type of child care and maternal depression; among children with depressed mothers, centre child care was associated with increased odds of PDA. Findings suggest that the associations between child care arrangement and child development involve interactions of factors that influence a child’s home environment. Future child development studies exploring these interactions are warranted.

Footnotes

Work attributed to: Population Health Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto

Funding for this project was made available through the Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on Statistics Canada microdata tape National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth that contains anonymized data collected in the 1994/95 Special Survey. All computations on these microdata were prepared by Research Institute of the Hospital for Sick Children and the responsibility for the use and interpretation of these data is entirely that of the authors.

References

  • 1.Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Prevention of intellectual disabilities: Early interventions to improve cognitive development. Prev Med. 1998;27:224–32. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berlin LJ, Brooks-Gunn J, McCarton C, McCormick MC. The effectiveness of early intervention: Examining risk factors and pathways to enhanced development. Prev Med. 1998;27:238–45. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Doherty G. The Great Child Care Debate: The Long-term Effects of Non-parental Child Care. Toronto: Childcare Resource and Research Unit; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bertrand J. Canada Health Action: Building on the Legacy. Volume 1. Determinants of Health: Children and Youth. Quebec: Éditions MultiMondes; 1998. Enriching the preschool experiences of children; pp. 3–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caughy MO, DiPietro JA, Strobino DM. Daycare participation as a protective factor in the cognitive development of low-income children. Child Development. 1994;65:457–71. doi: 10.2307/1131396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Steinhauer PD. Canada Health Action: Building on the Legacy. Volume 1. Determinants of Health: Children and Youth. Quebec: Éditions MultiMondes; 1998. Developing resiliency in children from disadvantaged populations; pp. 47–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dilks SA. Developmental aspects of child care. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 1991;38:1529–43. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)38235-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doherty G, Stuart B. The association between child care quality, ratio and staff training: A Canada-wide study. Can J Research in Early Childhood Education. 1997;6:127–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Desai S, Chase-Lansdale PL, Michael RT. Mother or market? Effects of maternal employment on the intellectual ability of 4-year-old children. Demography. 1989;26:545–61. doi: 10.2307/2061257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Caldwell BM. Impact of day care on the child. Pediatrics. 1993;91:225–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lamb ME. Effects of nonparental child care on child development: An update. Can J Psychiatry. 1996;41:330–42. doi: 10.1177/070674379604100603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Human Resources Development CanadaStatistics Canada. National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. User’s Handbook and Microdata Guide. Ottawa: Minister of Industry; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Poe GS. Design and Procedures for the 1981 Child Health Supplement to the National Health Interview Survey. Working paper series. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baker PC, Kech CK, Mott FL, Quinlan SV. NLSY Child Handbook - Revised Edition. A Guide to the 1986–1990 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - Child Data. Columbus, Ohio: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mott FL, Baker PC, Ball DE, et al. The NLSY Children 1992: Description and Evaluation - Revised. Columbus, Ohio: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Center for Human Resource Research. NLSY79 1996, Child and Young Adult Data Users Guide. Columbus, Ohio: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peterson JL, Moore KA. Motor and Social Development in Infancy: Some Results from a National Survey. Washington: Child Trends; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bates JE, Freeland CAB, Lounsbury ML. Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Development. 1984;50:794–803. doi: 10.2307/1128946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kohen DE, Hertzman C, Wiens M. Environmental Changes and Children’s Competencies. Hull, Quebec: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada; 1998. p. 54. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Statistics Canada. Low Income Cut-Offs. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Levin S. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital and Family Therapy. 1978;9:19–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00537.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital and Family Therapy. 1983;9:171–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Byles J, Byrne C, Boyle MH, Offord DR. Ontario Child Health Study: Reliability and Validity of the General Functioning Subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process. 1988;27:97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cutrona CE, Russell DW. The provision of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships. 1989;1:37–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–404. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ross DP, Scott K, Kelly MA. Overview: Children in Canada in the 1990s. Growing up in Canada: National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Ottawa: Statistics Canada and Human Resources Development Canada; 1996. pp. 15–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Landy S, Tam KK. Understanding the Contribution of Multiple Risk Factors on Child Development at Various Ages. Hull, Quebec: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada; 1998. p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Strayhorn JM, Weidman CS. A parent practices scale and its relation to parent and child mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1988;27:613–18. doi: 10.1097/00004583-198809000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schlesselman JJ, Stolley PD. Case-control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982. Multivariate analysis; pp. 227–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Millar WJ, Hill GB. Childhood asthma. Health Reports. 1998;10:9–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.American Psychiatric Association task force on day care for pre-school children. Day care for early preschool children: Implications for the child and family. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:1281–87. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.8.1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Majnemer A. Benefits of early intervention for children with developmental disabilities. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology. 1998;5:62–69. doi: 10.1016/S1071-9091(98)80020-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Iannantuono A, Eyles J. Meanings in policy: A textual analysis of Canada’s “Achieving Health for All” document. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:1611–21. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00255-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. Child Outcomes When Child Care Center Classes Meet Recommended Standards for Quality. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1072–77. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.National Council of Welfare. Preschool Children: Promises to Keep. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Childcare ResourceResearch Unit. Child Care in Canada: Provinces and Territories 1995. Toronto: Childcare Resource and Research Unit; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Burchinal MR, Roberts JE, Nabors LA, Bryant DM. Quality of center child care and infant cognitive and language development. Child Development. 1996;67:606–20. doi: 10.2307/1131835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES