Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2002 Mar 1;93(2):142–145. doi: 10.1007/BF03404556

A Retrospective Study of the Accuracy of Cancer Information in Ontario Daily Newspapers

Megan M MacDonald 1, Laurie Hoffman-Goetz 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6980091  PMID: 11963520

Abstract

Context: Studies suggest that the mass media is a common source of cancer information for the public. However, the quality of cancer information through various print outlets has not been extensively investigated.

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of cancer information in a retrospective sample of Ontario daily newspapers as well as to determine the amount of mobilizing (enabling) information about community resources for cancer.

Methods and Results: Of 1,027 articles on cancer for 1991, drawn from the 5 highest and 5 lowest circulating newspapers, a random 30% sample (306 articles) was obtained. Only 40 articles had traceable citations (journal name, name of researcher, name of educational institution, or direct quotes from identifiable sources). Of these, 47.5% had misleading titles and 55% included erroneous information or omitted important study results. Only 13 (6.9%) included mobilizing information regarding prevention, diagnosis, treatment or support.

Interpretation: Cancer information in newspapers contain frequent inaccuracies and fail to provide mobilizing information. Inaccurate newspaper information about cancer is of concern if the public relies on this channel for at least part of their health knowledge.

References

  • 1.James C, James N, Davies D, Harvey P, Tweddle S. Preferences for different sources of information about cancer. Patient Ed Counsel. 1999;37:273–82. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hofstetter CR, Schultze WA, Mulvihill MM. Communications media, public health, and public affairs: Exposure in a multimedia community. Health Commun. 1992;4:259–71. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc0404_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frewer LJ, Shepard R. Attributing information to different sources: Effects on the perceived qualities of information, on the perceived relevance of information, and on attitude formation. Public Understand Sci. 1994;3:385–401. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/3/4/003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Durant JR, Evans GA, Thomas GP. The public understanding of science. Nature. 1989;340:11–14. doi: 10.1038/340011a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mazur A. Media coverage and public opinion on scientific controversies. J Commun. 1981;31:106–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01234.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fan DP, McAvoy G. Predications of public opinion on the spread of AIDS: Introduction of new computer methodologies. J Sex Res. 1989;26:159–87. doi: 10.1080/00224498909551504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clift E, Freimuth V. Health communication: What is it and what can it do for you? J Health Ed. 1995;26:68–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arkin EB. Cancer risk communication-what we know. JNCI Monographs. 1999;25:182–85. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller MG, Millar KU. The influence of informational and performance messages on intentions to perform health behaviors. Psychol Health Med. 1998;3:243–52. doi: 10.1080/13548509808400599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fink R, Roeser R, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Lacher M. Effects of news events on response to a breast cancer screening program. Public Health Rep. 1978;93:318–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Caudill E, Ashdown P. The New England Journal of Medicine as news source. Journalism Quart. 1989;66:458–62. doi: 10.1177/107769908906600228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Willis J, Okunade AA. Reporting on Risks: The Practice and Ethics of Health and Safety Communication. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lupton D. Femininity, responsibility, and the technological imperative discourses on breast cancer in the Australian press. Int J Health Services. 1994;24:73–89. doi: 10.2190/1B6J-1P5R-AXCR-MRNY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moyer A, Greener S, Beauvais J, Salovey P. Accuracy of health research reported in the popular press: Breast cancer and mammography. Health Commun. 1995;7:147–61. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc0702_4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Molitor F. Accuracy in science news reporting by newspapers: The case of aspirin for the prevention of heart attacks. Health Commun. 1993;5:209–24. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc0503_4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Russell C. Living can be hazardous to your health: How the news media cover cancer risks. JNCI Monographs. 1999;25:167–70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.MacDonald M, Hoffman-Goetz L. Cancer coverage in newspapers serving large and small communities in Ontario. Can J Public Health. 2001;92:372–75. doi: 10.1007/BF03404983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Greenberg M, Wartenberg D. Newspaper coverage of cancer clusters. Health Educ Q. 1991;18:363–74. doi: 10.1177/109019819101800308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chapman S, Lupton D. The Fight for Public Health: Principles and Practice of Media. London, Great Britain: BMJ Publishing Group; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Atkin C, Arkin EB. Issues and initiatives in communicating health information to the public. In: Atkin C, Wallack L, editors. Mass Communication and Public Health: Complexities and Conflicts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990. pp. 13–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield Publishing; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Finnegan JR, Meischke H, Zapka JG, Leviton L, Meshack A, Benjamin-Garner R, et al. Patient delay in seeking care for heart attack symptoms: Findings from focus groups conducted in five U.S. regions. Prevent Med. 2000;31:205–13. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Freimuth VS, Greenberg RH, DeWitt J, Romano RM. J Commun. 1984. Covering cancer: Newspapers and the public interest; pp. 62–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Loehrer PJ, Greger HA, Weinberger M, Musick B, Miller M, Nichols C, et al. Knowledge and beliefs about cancer in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. Cancer. 1991;68:1665–71. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19911001)68:7<1665::AID-CNCR2820680734>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shuchman M, Wilkes MS. Medical scientists and health news reporting: A case of miscommunication. Ann Int Med. 1997;126:976–82. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Edwards A, Elwyn G, Covey J, Matthews E, Pill R. Presenting risk information-a review of the effects of “framing” and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun. 2001;6:61–82. doi: 10.1080/10810730150501413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singer E. A question of accuracy: How journalists and scientists report research of hazards. J Commun. 1990;40:102–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02284.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Johnson JD, Meischke H. Women’s preferences for cancer-related information from specific types of mass media. Health Care for Women Int. 1994;15:23–30. doi: 10.1080/07399339409516091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yeaton WH, Smith D, Rogers K. Evaluating understanding of popular press reports of health research. Health Educ Q. 1990;17:223–34. doi: 10.1177/109019819001700208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES