Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2002 Nov 1;93(Suppl 2):S27–S32. doi: 10.1007/BF03403615

Preventable Feto-infant Mortality

Application of a Conceptual Framework for Perinatal Health Surveillance to Manitoba Perinatal Outcomes

Maureen Heaman 14,, Lawrence J Elliott 24, Carole Beaudoin 34, Lynn Baker, James F Blanchard 24
PMCID: PMC6980126  PMID: 12580387

Abstract

Background

Perinatal health surveillance systems have lacked conceptual frameworks to translate data into information for policy and program planning. This paper demonstrates the application of a conceptual framework in the analysis of feto-infant mortality data in the province of Manitoba.

Methods

Fetal and infant deaths were categorized according to a two-dimensional framework of birthweight and age-at-death, and grouped into four broad categories of contributors to perinatal health: Maternal Health, Maternal Care, Newborn Care, and Infant Care. Birth Weight Proportionate Mortality Rates (BWPMR) were calculated for each of the four categories, and preventable “excess” feto-infant mortality was estimated through comparisons to a benchmark sub-population.

Results

Between 1985 and 1998, feto-infant mortality declined from 12.3 to 9.8 deaths per 1000 births in Manitoba. Much of this decline occurred in the Newborn Care category; there were only slight declines in deaths attributed to Maternal Health and Infant Care factors. Comparison of the feto-infant mortality rate to the benchmark rate revealed an excess of 3.46 deaths per 1000 births, an “opportunity gap” of 33%. Substantial regional variations in feto-infant mortality rates were observed.

Summary

Application of this conceptual framework provided useful information to aid in policy and program planning. As the greatest excess feto-infant mortality was observed in the Maternal Health and Infant Care categories, attention to the broader determinants of health which influence these categories will be required.

Footnotes

The full reports “Manitoba Perinatal Surveillance Report, 1985-1996” and “Manitoba Perinatal Health Surveillance Report, 1989-1998: Provincial and Winnipeg Geographic Breakdown” on which this article is based are available from the Manitoba Health Public Health Branch, 4th floor, 300 Carlton Street, Winnipeg, MB R3B 3M9, or online at: http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/publichealth/epiunit/reports.htm

Formerly of Standards Development Branch, Manitoba Health

Sources of support: This work was supported as part of preparation of two reports on perinatal health surveillance by the Epidemiology Unit of Manitoba Health. The results and conclusions are those of the authors and no official endorsement by Manitoba Health was intended or should be inferred.

References

  • 1.Thacker S, Berkelman R. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164–90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McCarthy B. Basic concepts in perinatal health surveillance: Building a conceptual framework. Paper presented at the Manitoba Health Epidemiology Unit Perinatal Research Symposium. MB: Winnipeg; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Health Canada. Measuring Up: A Health Surveillance Update on Canadian Children and Youth. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Health Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report 2000. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilkins R, Houle C. Health status of children. Health Rep. 1999;11(3):25–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization Collaborating Center in Perinatal CareHealth Service Research in MaternalChild Care. Unintended pregnancy and infant mortality/morbidity. In: Amler R, Dull H, editors. Closing the Gap: The Burden of Unnecessary Illness. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McCarthy B. The risk approach revisited: A critical review of developing country experience and its use in health planning. In: Liljestrand J, Povey WG, editors. Maternal Health Care in an International Perspective. Proceedings of the XXII Berzelius Symposium, 1991 May 27–29, Stockholm, Sweden. Sweden: Uppsala University; 1992. pp. 107–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.CDC CARE Collaborative Health Initiative CCHI. The Healthy Newborn: A Reference Manual for Program Managers. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen J, Fair M, Wilkins R, Cyr M. Fetal and Infant Mortality Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Maternal education and fetal and infant mortality in Quebec. Health Rep. 1998;10(2):53–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kogan M. Social causes of low birthweight. J Royal Society Med. 1995;88:611–15. doi: 10.1177/014107689508801103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kramer M, Seguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L. Socioeconomic disparities in pregnancy outcome: Why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14:194–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sappenfield W, Peck M. WHO Perinatal Periods of Risk approach: The U.S. Urban Experience. Abstract (p. 63) and presentation materials from the 1999 Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Epidemiology Workshop: Building Data Capacity in Maternal and Child Health, Dec. 8–9, 1999. Atlanta, GA. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Singh G, Yu S. Infant mortality in the United States: Trends, differentials, and projections, 1950 through 2010. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:957–64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.85.7.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.MacDorman M, Atkinson J. Infant mortality statistics from the 1997 period linked birth/infant death data set. National Vital Statistics Reports. 1999;47(23):1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hogue C, Hargraves M. Class, race, and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:9–12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.83.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Manitoba Health Public Health Branch Epidemiology Unit Perinatal Project Team. Manitoba Perinatal Surveillance Report, 1985–1996. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Health; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Manitoba Health Public Health Branch Epidemiology Unit Perinatal Project Team. Manitoba Perinatal Health Surveillance Report 1989–1998: Provincial and Winnipeg Geographic Breakdown. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Health; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roos L, Mustard C, Nicol J. Registries and administrative data: Organization and accuracy. Med Care. 1993;31:201–12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brownell M, Mayer T, Martens P, Kozyrskyj A, Fergusson P, Bodnarchuk J, et al. Using a population-based health information system to study child health. Can J Public Health. 2002;93(Suppl.2):S9–S14. doi: 10.1007/BF03403612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Health Canada. Perinatal Health Indicators for Canada: A Resource Manual. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.CityMatCH. Perinatal Periods of Risk Approach. Available from URL: https://doi.org/www.citymatch.org/PPOR/index.htm
  • 22.U.S. Public Health Service. Healthy People 2010 - Conference Edition. Chapter 16: Maternal, Infant, and Child Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berkowitz G, Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15:414–43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heaman M, Sprague A, Stewart P. Reducing the preterm birth rate: A population health strategy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs. 2001;30:20–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01518.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hueston W, Knox M, Eilers G, Pauwels J, lonsdorf D. The effectiveness of preterm birth prevention educational programs for high-risk women: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:705–12. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00202-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moutquin J, Milot-Roy V, Irion O. Preterm birth prevention: Effectiveness of current strategies. J Society Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 1996;18:571–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Health Canada, Canadian Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths, Canadian Paediatric Society, Canadian Institute for Child Health. Joint Statement: Reducing the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Canada, 1999. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Czeizel A, Dudas I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1832–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199212243272602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Williams B. Social approaches to lowering infant mortality: lessons from the European experience. J Public Health Pol. 1994;15(4):18–25. doi: 10.2307/3342604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES