Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2003 Nov 1;94(6):463–467. doi: 10.1007/BF03405086

Under-reporting of Live Births in Ontario: 1991–1997

Graham L Woodward 113, Monica K Bienefeld 213, Sten Ardal 113,
PMCID: PMC6980132  PMID: 14700248

Abstract

Objective

To examine unregistered births in Ontario and consider related factors, including adoption of administrative fees for birth registration.

Methods

Documents from both the parents and the attending physician are required for births to be entered into Ontario’s live birth database. Our study used data from the Ontario Registrar General to look at the prevalence and characteristics of unregistered births, and a survey of municipal clerks to identify municipalities charging fees for parental documentation.

Results

The percentage of births going unrecorded increased threefold from 1991 to 1997. The odds of an unregistered birth were higher for teenage mothers, low birthweight babies, and mothers residing in a municipality that charged birth registration fees.

Conclusion

The introduction of registration fees by some municipalities appears to account for an increase in unregistered births. It is recommended that the Ontario Registrar General work to remove financial and administrative barriers that compromise birth statistics.

Footnotes

The Central East Health Information Partnership is funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Ministry.

References

  • 1.Health Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Service Canada; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Joseph KS, Kramer SM. Recent trends in Canadian infant mortality rates: The effect of changes in registration of live newborns weighing less than 500g. CMAJ. 1996;155:1047–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Woodward GL, Ardal S. Data Quality Report: Effect of Residence Code Errors on Fertility Rates. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Statistics Canada. Postal Code Conversion File. Ottawa: Ministry of Industry; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ennis SL, Woodward GL, Ardal S. Low Birth Weight: Troubling Trend or Misguided Measure (Extended Mix) 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bienefeld M, Woodward GL, Ardal S. Underreporting of Live Births in Ontario: 1991–1997. 2001. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES