The content is available as a PDF (130.2 KB).
Footnotes
The views expressed herein are entirely those of the author, and do not reflect BC Government or Prevention Source BC Policy.
References
- 1.Single E. Defining harm reduction. Drug and Alcohol Review. 1995;14:287–90. doi: 10.1080/09595239500185371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Erickson PG. Introduction The three phases of harm reduction. An examination of emerging concepts, methodologies, and critiques. Substance Use and Misuse. 1999;34:1–7. doi: 10.3109/10826089909035631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Erickson PG, Riley DM, Cheung YW, O’Hare P Eds. Harm Reduction: A New Direction for Drug Policies and Programs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cheung YW. Substance abuse and developments in harm reduction. CMAJ. 2000;162:1697–700. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hankins C. Substance use: Time for drug law reform. CMAJ. 2000;162:1693–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Riley D. The Harm Reduction Model: Pragmatic Approaches to Drug Use from the Area Between Intolerance and Neglect. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Health Canada. Canada’s Drug Strategy. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roberts LJ, Marlatt AG. Harm reduction. In: Ott PJ, Tarter RE, Ammerman RT, editors. Sourcebook on Substance Abuse: Etiology, Epidemiology, Assessment, and Treatment. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1999. pp. 389–98. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mangham C. Tobacco reduction: A continued health promotion challenge. Can J Public Health. 1999;90(2):77–79. doi: 10.1007/BF03404104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kemeny A, Tremblay S. Drinking and driving: Have we made progress? Canadian Social Trends. 1998;49:20–25. [Google Scholar]
- 11.National Institute on Health, Sweden. A Restrictive Drug Policy: The Swedish Experience. Stockholm: Grafiska Gruppen; 1993. [Google Scholar]