Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2001 Nov 1;92(6):412–416. doi: 10.1007/BF03404530

Analysis of Factors Related to Development, Regulatory Level and Change in Municipal No-smoking By-laws in Ontario

Christina Lacchetti 13, Tom Abernathy 13,
PMCID: PMC6980187  PMID: 11799543

Abstract

Objectives: This study explored and measured the presence, content and growth of municipal no-smoking by-laws and examined factors related to differences in by-law breadth and comprehensiveness.

Methods: By-laws from each jurisdiction across Ontario were collected and scored relative to their breadth and restrictiveness using the Asbridge-O’Grady Index. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used to compare the distributions of municipal characteristics among the regulatory level of municipal smoking legislation.

Results: Twenty-three percent of Ontario municipalities (215/951) had enacted smoking by-laws by the end of 1998 compared to 18% (169/951) in 1994. Larger municipalities tend to be significantly more restrictive than smaller municipalities.

Conclusion: No-smoking legislation has become more extensive and restrictive in Ontario since the passage of the 1994 Tobacco Control Act. There was little legislative variability among the regions that contained tobacco-producing municipalities and those that did not.

Footnotes

This project was carried out with funding provided by the Ontario Ministry of Health and with the cooperation of Public Health Units in the province of Ontario.

References

  • 1.Kaiserman MJ. The cost of smoking in Canada, 1991. Chronic Dis Can. 1997;18:13–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Single E, Robson L, Xie X, Rehm JT. The economic cost of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs in Canada, 1992. Addiction. 1998;93:991–1006. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9379914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brownson RC, Newschaffer CJ, Ali-Abarghoui F. Policy research for disease prevention: Challenges and practical recommendations. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1207–11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.85.9.1207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tobacco Control Act. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abernathy TJ. A Study to Measure the Impact of the Tobacco Control Act. Report to the Ministry of Health. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Asbridge M, O’Grady W, Abernathy TJ. Municipal no smoking laws in Ontario: An exploration and analysis of the role of legislation in protecting the health of non-smokers. Working Paper Series No. 29. Toronto, ON: Ontario Tobacco Research Unit; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS, Version 9.0 . SPSS for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario Health Survey. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Statistics Canada. Census of the Population. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rigotti NA, Pashos CL. No-smoking laws in the United States: An analysis of state and city actions to limit smoking in public places and workplaces. JAMA. 1991;266:3162–67. doi: 10.1001/jama.1991.03470220078031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.HealthWelfare Canada. Smoking By-laws in Canada 1991. 1991. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES