Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec 20;82(5):1239–1241. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.030

Hidradenitis suppurativa encounters in a national electronic health record database notable for low dermatology utilization, infrequent biologic prescriptions, and frequent opiate prescriptions

Mackenzie R Wehner 1, Robert Micheletti 1, Megan H Noe 1, Eleni Linos 2, David J Margolis 1, Haley B Naik 3
PMCID: PMC6980686  NIHMSID: NIHMS1547453  PMID: 31866261

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an under-studied disease. Our objective was to characterize HS encounters, including providers seen, medications prescribed, and procedures performed, which have not previously been reported.

We performed a cross-sectional study of encounters using a random sample of OptumInsights Electronic Health Record Database (previously Humedica13; January 2007 – June 2017). Eligible encounters had an HS diagnosis code (ICD-9 705.83, ICD-10 L73.2) and either specified a setting (e.g. outpatient, inpatient) or had a prescription written. We compared non-antibiotic systemics (listed in Table 2) before and after FDA-approval of adalimumab and compared provider specialty and opiate prescriptions in HS versus psoriasis (defined by ICD-9 696.1, ICD-10 L40.0–40.4, L40.8, or L40.9) using chi-squares. In outpatient visits without procedures, we tested whether a dermatology encounter was associated with a non-antibiotic systemic or opiate prescription using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender, race, and region, and using generalized estimating equations to account for patients with multiple encounters. To further address potential within-patient correlations, we performed bootstrapped sensitivity analyses with 100 replications. Finally, we performed a sensitivity analysis of patients with two or more HS diagnoses, as the positive predictive value of a single diagnosis is 77–79%.4,5

Table 2:

Setting, provider, medications, and procedures in HS encounters

HS encounters Number (percentage)
Setting (n=22,019)1
 Outpatient 15928 (72.3%)
 Inpatient 1602 (7.3%)
 Emergency department 1133 (5.2%)
 Home health or skilled nursing 547 (2.5%)
 Prescription-only 2809 (12.8%)
Provider (n=20,752)2
 Dermatology 4207 (20.3%)
 Surgery 4652 (22.4%)
 Family or Internal Medicine 10765 (51.9%)
 Emergency medicine 2176 (10.5%)
 Pediatrics 1012 (4.9%)
 Obstetrics/Gynecology 1361 (6.6%)
Prescription medications (n=22,331)
Oral antibiotics 8207 (36.8%)
Topical antibiotics 2847 (12.7%)
Non-antibiotic systemic medications3 594 (2.7%)
   pre-Humira FDA approval (n=14,009) 334 (2.4%)4
   post-Humira FDA approval (n=8,322) 260 (3.1 %)4
  Biologics5 183 (0.8%)
  Non-biologic systemics6 420 (1.9%)
Opiates (all encounters) 2993 (13.4%)
 Opiates (non-procedure encounters)7 (n=20,473) 2659 (13.0%)
  Dermatology (n=3392) 84 (2.5%)
  Surgery (n=4237) 798 (18.8%)
  Family or Internal Medicine (n=10151) 1259 (12.4%)
  Emergency medicine (n=1745) 482 (27.6%)
  Pediatrics (n=962) 89 (9.3%)
  Obstetrics/Gynecology (n=1307) 87 (6.7%)
Procedures (n=19,522)8
 Any skin procedure 1858 (9.5%)
 Incision and drainage 931 (4.8%)
 Surgery (deroofing, biopsy, excision, reconstruction) 248 (1.3%)
 Injection 675 (3.5%)
1

312 encounters had more than one setting recorded (eg emergency and inpatient) and are not included

2

Percentages may add up to more than 100% because more than one provider could be associated with each encounter, and one provider could list more than one specialty

3

Non-antibiotic systemic medications included adalimumab, infliximab, anakinra, ustekinumab, cyclosporine, acitretin, isotretinoin, finasteride, and spironolactone

4

Chi-square comparing non-antibiotic systemics before and after FDA approval of adalimumab p=0.001

5

Biologic medications included adalimumab, infliximab, anakinra, and ustekinumab

6

Non-biologic systemic medications included cyclosporine, acitretin, isotretinoin, finasteride, and spironolactone

7

Percentages may add up to more than 100% because more than one provider could be associated with each encounter, and one provider could list more than one specialty. Displayed are the percentages of specialty encounters (excluding encounters with skin procedures) that had opiate prescriptions.

8

Any skin procedure includes all of the following: incision and drainage codes CPT 10060, 10061, 10080, 10140, 10160, 19020, 46040, 46050, and ICD-9 86.04; surgery codes CPT 10040, 11100, 11450–11471, ICD-9 86.11, 86.24; injection codes CPT 11900, 11901, HCPCS J3301

In our dataset of approximately 7.7 million patients, 22,331 encounters in 8,539 patients met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics are shown in Table 1. Encounter characteristics (setting, provider, medications, and procedures) are shown in Table 2. In HS, 20.3% of encounters were with dermatology, as compared with 49.0% of psoriasis encounters (p<0.001). The ten most common prescriptions written were doxycycline, topical clindamycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, hydrocodone-acetaminophen, cephalexin, oral clindamycin, oxycodone-acetaminophen, minocycline, amoxicillin-potassium clavulanate, and topical mupirocin. Use of non-antibiotic systemics was low (2.7%) but increased after adalimumab FDA approval (p=0.001). In total, 18.1% of patients received an opiate prescription during an HS encounter, as compared with 8.5% of psoriasis patients (p<0.001). In outpatient visits without skin procedures, seeing dermatology had an OR of 0.23 (95% CI 0.17–0.31) for opiates and an OR of 6.44 (95% CI 4.87–8.52) for non-antibiotic systemics. When we performed bootstrapped sensitivity analyses, the ORs were similar. A sensitivity analysis of patients with two or more HS diagnoses yielded similar results, except the percentage of patients who received opiate prescriptions was higher (29.0%).

Table 1:

Demographics of HS patients

Demographic Number (percentage) or mean (SD)
Sex
 Female 6438 (75.4%)
 Male 2091 (24.5%)
 Missing 10 (0.1%)
Age at first HS encounter
 0–17 657 (7.7%)
 18–29 2494 (29.2%)
 30–39 2000 (23.4%)
 40–49 1521 (17.8%)
 50–59 1186 (13.9%)
 60+ 681 (8%)
Race
 Caucasian 5082 (59.5%)
 African American 2278 (26.7%)
 Asian 125 (1.5%)
 Other/unknown 1054 (12.3%)
Ethnicity
 Hispanic 499 (5.8%)
 Not Hispanic 7172 (84%)
 Unknown 868 (10.2%)
Census region
 Midwest 4082 (47.8%)
 South 2361 (27.7%)
 Northeast 863 (10.1%)
 West 805 (9.4%)
 Other/unknown 428 (5%)
Mean (SD) years of follow up in the dataset 6.8 (SD 3.5)
Number of HS encounters
 1 5168 (60.5%)
 2+ 3371 (39.5%)

Our findings show that HS encounters occur most commonly with family or internal medicine and that opiates are frequently prescribed, while non-antibiotic systemic treatments are infrequently prescribed. Outpatient non-procedure encounters with dermatology were less likely to have opiate and more likely to have non-antibiotic systemic prescriptions.

This study has limitations: it is retrospective and cross-sectional. HS diagnoses cannot be validated in this dataset (though they have been previously4,5) and undiagnosed HS cannot be captured. Additionally, HS encounters may have included other medical problems besides HS, which we did not evaluate, though the ten most common prescriptions in these encounters are all HS treatments.

Low dermatology utilization and infrequent non-antibiotic systemic therapy highlight the need for improved dermatology access, and the substantial opiate prescriptions highlights the need for more effective management strategies in HS.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of interest: MW, RM, MHN, EL, DJM have no conflicts of interest. HBN has received grant suppot from Abbvie and consulting fees from 23andme, however there is no conflict with the present study. HBN is a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation board member.

IRB approval was exempted for this study.

References:

  • 1.Nunes AP, Yang J, Radican L, et al. Assessing occurrence of hypoglycemia and its severity from electronic health records of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;121:192–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walker AM, Zhou X, Ananthakrishnan AN, et al. Computer-assisted expert case definition in electronic health records. Int J Med Inform. 2016;86:62–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bae JP, Lage MJ, Mo D, Nelson DR, Hoogwerf BJ. Obesity and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus: Analysis of physician electronic health records in the US from 2009–2011. J Diabetes Complications. 2016;30(2):212–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Garg A, Kirby JS, Lavian J, Lin G, Strunk A. Sex- and Age-Adjusted Population Analysis of Prevalence Estimates for Hidradenitis Suppurativa in the United States. JAMA dermatology. 2017;153(8):760–764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shlyankevich J, Chen AJ, Kim GE, Kimball AB. Hidradenitis suppurativa is a systemic disease with substantial comorbidity burden: a chart-verified case-control analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(6):1144–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES