Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2019 Dec 31;21(1):292. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010292

Identification of Novel Pathways Associated with Patterned Cerebellar Purkinje Neuron Degeneration in Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C1

Kyle B Martin 1, Ian M Williams 1, Celine V Cluzeau 1, Antony Cougnoux 1, Ryan K Dale 2, James R Iben 3, Niamh X Cawley 1, Christopher A Wassif 1, Forbes D Porter 1,*
PMCID: PMC6981888  PMID: 31906248

Abstract

Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 (NPC1) is a lysosomal disease characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia. In NPC1, a defect in cholesterol transport leads to endolysosomal storage of cholesterol and decreased cholesterol bioavailability. Purkinje neurons are sensitive to the loss of NPC1 function. However, degeneration of Purkinje neurons is not uniform. They are typically lost in an anterior-to-posterior gradient with neurons in lobule X being resistant to neurodegeneration. To gain mechanistic insight into factors that protect or potentiate Purkinje neuron loss, we compared RNA expression in cerebellar lobules III, VI, and X from control and mutant mice. An unexpected finding was that the gene expression differences between lobules III/VI and X were more pronounced than those observed between mutant and control mice. Functional analysis of genes with anterior to posterior gene expression differences revealed an enrichment of genes related to neuronal cell survival within the posterior cerebellum. This finding is consistent with the observation, in multiple diseases, that posterior Purkinje neurons are, in general, resistant to neurodegeneration. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate anterior to posterior transcriptome-wide changes in gene expression in the cerebellum. Our data can be used to not only explore potential pathological mechanisms in NPC1, but also to further understand cerebellar biology.

Keywords: Niemann–Pick disease, type C1, NPC1, cerebellum, neurodegeneration, Purkinje neurons, RNA-seq, WGCNA

1. Introduction

Niemann–Pick disease, type C (NPC) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by accumulation of unesterified cholesterol and glycosphingolipids within the endo-lysosomal system. Although the age of onset and clinical manifestations are heterogenous, NPC patients may present with neonatal cholestasis or hepatosplenomegaly. These visceral signs often precede the onset of progressive neurological disorders, which include vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, dementia, and cerebellar ataxia [1,2]. NPC is caused by mutations in either NPC1 or NPC2, which encode a lysosomal transmembrane protein and a small soluble lysosomal protein, respectively [2,3]. Together, the NPC1 and NPC2 proteins function to facilitate the efflux of cholesterol from the late endosome-lysosome compartment, as mutations in either gene leads to the accumulation of unesterified cholesterol, glycosphingolipids, and additional lipids within this compartment [2,4,5]. However, the pathological mechanisms by which these mutations lead to progressive neurodegeneration remains unclear.

A common neurological complication observed in NPC1 patients is cerebellar ataxia [6]. The cerebellum is a highly organized and conserved structure that, in mammals and birds, is divided into ten distinct lobules by shallow fissures. Although each lobule has a distinct form, each is comprised of three layers. The center layer is the Purkinje neuron layer, which derives its name from the monolayer of Purkinje soma that aligns within each lobule. The Purkinje neurons extend elaborate dendrites into the outermost molecular layer, where they form excitatory synapses with climbing fibers that originate from the inferior olivary nucleus. The innermost granule cell layer is mainly comprised of granule cells, which are a densely packed neuronal cell type. Granule cells account for the largest neuronal population within the brain. In the cerebellum, granule cells function to transmit excitatory input from mossy fibers to the dendrites of the Purkinje neurons through their long axonal projections, known as parallel fibers. Hence, synaptic inputs from granule cells and the climbing fibers are integrated by the Purkinje neurons before being projected down their axons, where they make inhibitory synaptic contact with cerebellar nuclei at the base of the cerebellum. Therefore, Purkinje neurons represent the sole output of the cerebellum, as they integrate all cerebellar inputs before projecting to their target neurons [7].

Although the structure of the cerebellar cortex is consistent throughout all lobules, distinct patterns of gene expression generate highly reproducible transverse zones within the cerebellum that can further be divided into parasagittal stripes [8,9]. The most common marker of these zones and stripes is zebrin II, which has been identified as the glycolytic enzyme, aldolase C [8,10]. Zebrin II is a Purkinje neuron specific marker that is expressed in a distinct subset of aligned Purkinje neurons, thus resulting in an alternating array of zebrin II-positive and zebrin II-negative parasagittal stripes [11]. Furthermore, these stripes form larger domains that comprise four separate transverse zones of the cerebellum: the striped anterior zone (lobules I–V), the homogeneously zebrin II-positive central zone (lobules VI–VII), the striped posterior zone (lobules VIII–dorsal IX), and the uniformly zebrin II-positive nodular zone (ventral lobule IX–X) [9,12]. These unique gene expression patterns also give rise to functional differences, as many cerebellar disorders resulting in Purkinje neuron death are restricted to specific zones or parasagittal stripes [13]. Purkinje neurons within the zebrin II-negative stripes are more susceptible to cell death, resulting in an anterior-to-posterior gradient of neurodegeneration. This pattern is observed in multiple spontaneous mouse models, such as the Purkinje cell degeneration (Nna1pcd) [14], tottering (Cacna1atg) [15], and lurcher (Grid2lc) [16] mice, or in response to numerous exogenous toxins, such as ibogaine [17], cytosine arabinoside [18], methotrexate [19], and alcohol [20,21,22]. Similar anterior-to-posterior Purkinje neuron death patterns are observed in multiple genetic disorders, including those for multiple forms of the spinocerebellar ataxias [23,24,25], Menkes syndrome [26,27], Niemann–Pick disease type A/B [28], and Niemann–Pick disease type C1 [29]. For NPC1, studies utilizing BALB/cNctr-Npc1m1N/J (Npc1−/−) mice have demonstrated that the Purkinje neurons undergo a patterned cell death that initially affects the zebrin II-negative Purkinje neurons starting at approximately postnatal day 40 [30]. As the disease progresses, additional zebrin II-positive Purkinje neurons throughout lobules I–IX are also lost. This progression continues until the animal succumbs to the disease, usually around postnatal day 70 to 90, at which time the only Purkinje neurons that remain are those zebrin II-positive cells of the ventral portion of lobule IX and the entire lobule X [31]. This spatiotemporal patterned cell death occurs despite the consistent presence of unesterified cholesterol accumulation and neuroinflammation throughout all the cerebellar lobules [32,33].

To gain mechanistic insight into factors that would either protect Purkinje neurons or potentiate their degeneration, we evaluated spatial cerebellar RNA expression patterns. Cerebellar lobules III, VI, and X were individually microdissected from asymptomatic 4.5-week-old Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice. RNA-sequencing was performed and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) [34] was utilized to observe any intrinsic, or NPC1-specific, differences in gene expression that may contribute to the survival of Purkinje neurons in lobule X of Npc1−/− mice.

2. Results

2.1. Immunohistochemistry and RNA-Sequencing

Immunohistochemistry of calbindin staining in the cerebellum of Npc1−/− mice confirmed the temporal and lobule specific loss of Purkinje neurons with disease progression when compared to Npc1+/+ littermates, which have a consistent Purkinje neuron density throughout their lifespan (Figure 1A). At 4.5 weeks of age, the staining pattern of Npc1−/− Purkinje neurons demonstrated no signs of neurodegeneration, consistent with a pre-symptomatic state of the Npc1−/− mice (Figure 1B). At seven weeks of age, however, the Purkinje neurons of the anterior cerebellar transverse zone (lobules I–V) have mostly degenerated, leaving only sporadic Purkinje neurons throughout the anterior lobules (Figure 1C). These remaining anterior Purkinje neurons are eventually lost by nine weeks of age; at this time, additional Purkinje neuron degeneration is also observed throughout the central (lobules VI–VII) and posterior (lobules VIII–dorsal IX) zones (Figure 1D). This progressive spatiotemporal pattern of neurodegeneration eventually generates uniform Purkinje neuron death from lobule I/II to dorsal lobule IX in end-stage Npc1−/− mice, while the Purkinje neurons of the nodular zone (ventral lobule IX–X) are spared [29,31].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The transcriptome of cerebellar lobule X is distinct from other lobules, regardless of Npc1 expression. (AD) Calbindin 1 staining of Purkinje neurons in representative sagittal cerebellar sections of a Npc1+/+ mouse at nine weeks of age (A), and Npc1−/− mice at 4.5 weeks (B), seven weeks (C), or nine weeks of age (D). The Purkinje neuron marker, Calbindin 1, is shown in red and a DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) counterstain in blue. Scale bar = 500 µm. (E) Principal component analysis of RNA-sequencing data sets from cerebellar lobules III, VI, and X from 4.5 weeks old Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− transgenic mice.

To identify metabolic or cellular pathways possibly contributing to the neuroprotection of the nodular zone Purkinje neurons in Npc1−/− mice, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on individual lobules previously demonstrated to be susceptible or resistant to Purkinje neuron degeneration. At 4.5 weeks of age, an age prior to the onset of widespread Purkinje neuron death, the cerebellum of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice were microdissected and RNA was isolated from the early susceptible zebrin-II striped anterior lobule III, the later susceptible uniformly zebrin-II positive central lobule VI, and the uniformly zebrin-II positive resistant nodular lobule X. RNA-seq was then performed to compare gene expression patterns within the lobules of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice and between the susceptible and resistant lobules of both genotypes. Each sample generated a minimum of 202 million reads per lobule. Between 84.7% to 89.5% of the reads were correctly mapped to the genome, with 47.9% to 65.9% of these mapped reads being properly paired reads.

2.2. Differential Gene Expression

Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the samples clustered into two groups along the first component based on their localization to the anterior/central or nodular region of the cerebellum, with the first group comprised of lobule III and VI samples from both genotypes and the second group containing the lobule X samples corresponding to both genotypes. The large variability between anterior/central and nodular lobules, irrespective of genotype, was further visualized by volcano plots, in which the log2 fold change in gene expression and negative log10 adjusted p-value were plotted (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). The largest and most significant changes in gene expression were found in the comparison of anterior/central lobules to the nodular lobule within each genotype. For example, within the Npc1+/+ cerebellum only 185 genes were differentially expressed when the anterior lobule III and central lobule VI were compared. In contrast, 1398 and 1313 genes were differentially expressed when either the anterior lobule III or the central lobule VI were compared to the nodular lobule X within the Npc1+/+ cerebellum, respectively (Supplementary Materials Figure S1A). Similarly, only 358 genes were differentially expressed within the anterior and central lobules of the Npc1−/− cerebellum, but 1317 and 1524 genes were differentially expressed when comparing either lobule III or lobule VI to lobule X, respectively (Supplementary Materials Figure S1B). When comparing between the control and mutant cerebella, less numerous significant changes were observed, as comparing lobules III, VI, and X between genotypes only demonstrated 316, 79, and 94 differentially expressed genes, respectively (Supplementary Materials Figure S1C). The complete differential expression analysis is provided for each comparison in Supplementary Materials File S1.

To further delineate the differences in gene expression that may contribute to the cerebellar pathology observed in Npc1−/− mice, we compared the significantly up/downregulated genes between the lobules of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice (Supplementary Materials Figure S2A). Sixty-six genes were commonly up/downregulated between lobules III, VI, and X of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice, with six genes being downregulated and 60 genes being upregulated in all Npc1−/− lobules (Supplementary Materials Figure S2B and Table S1). Of the 60 genes that were significantly upregulated, multiple genes have been previously described as upregulated in the whole cerebellum of Npc1−/− mice (Ctss, Cybb, Itgax, Itgb2, Gpnmb, Lyz2, Stab1, Icam1, C1qa, C1qb) [35,36], the whole brain of Npc1−/− mice (Clec7a, Mpeg1, Cd84, C4b, C3ar1, Trem2) [37], used for biomarkers of NPC1 (Lgals3 and Ctsd) [35], or as a marker for dysregulated microglia in Npc1−/− mice (Cd22) [38]. In almost all instances, the genes with upregulated expression in all lobules have been described as having a direct or indirect function related to the immune response. The most significantly downregulated gene in all lobules is Npc1, which validates our mouse model as being deficient in Npc1 transcripts. The second most significantly downregulated gene was Icmt, which is a Purkinje neuron enriched gene that encodes for isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase [39]. ICMT catalyzes the methylation of isoprenylated proteins that are targeted to the cell membrane. Dysregulation of Icmt has previously been shown to be an early marker of neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 [40]. Another gene downregulated in all Npc1−/− lobules is Casq2, which is another Purkinje neuron enriched gene that encodes for calsequestrin 2 [39]. Calsequestrin 2 has mostly been described in the context of cardiac function, where it acts as the main Ca2+ storage protein within sarcoplasmic reticulum [41]. As each of the most significantly downregulated genes, excluding Npc1, have been previously noted as being Purkinje neuron enriched, their downregulation across all lobules may represent early markers of neuronal dysfunction.

We also compared the gene expression changes that occurred specifically in the lobules of III and VI, but not X, between Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice (Supplementary Materials Figure S2C). This comparison represents an interesting subset of 32 genes that are only differentially expressed in the regions of the cerebellum that are susceptible to neurodegeneration and thus may contribute to the spatiotemporal pattern of neurodegeneration observed in NPC1. Eleven genes were increased in expression exclusively in lobules III and VI of the Npc1−/− mice (Supplementary Materials Table S2). The most significant increase in both lobules III and VI within Npc1−/− mice was for Olfml3, which is a microglia lineage marker [42]. Additional microglia activation markers, including Lcp1 and Ctsb, were also included in the top five most significantly upregulated genes within lobules III and VI of the Npc1−/− cerebellum [43,44]. This enrichment of microglia-related genes specifically within the anterior lobules is reflective of the accumulation of microglia within this region of the cerebellum at an age prior to neurodegeneration [45].

Another gene significantly increased was tyrosine hydroxylase (Th), which enzymatically catalyzes the rate-limiting step in catecholamine biosynthesis. Previous reports have described ectopic expression of Th within the Purkinje neurons of various murine models of cerebellar ataxia, including tottering, leaner, pogo, rolling Nagoya, dilute-lethal, and Npc1−/− mice [31,46,47,48,49]. In these models, ectopic TH expression occurs within a subset of Purkinje neurons that form parasagittal stripes across the cerebellum that is analogous to zebrin II, but the expression of both proteins is not completely concordant [48,50,51]. Although the role of TH in the context of cerebellar ataxia has not been completely elucidated, Th expression is regulated by a calcium response element, and thus increased Th expression is believed to occur in response to the elevated intracellular calcium levels that occur in some cases of cerebellar ataxia [52,53,54]. Therefore, increased Th expression within lobules III and VI of Npc1−/− mice may reflect a dysregulation of intracellular calcium levels within this region of the cerebellum. This is of interest in NPC1, as an elevation of cytosolic calcium levels has been suggested to compensate for the reduced calcium concentration observed within the endolysosomal system of NPC1 cells and may improve the glycosphingolipid storage phenotype [5].

In addition to the genes with increased expression, 21 genes had decreased expression specifically within lobules III and VI of the Npc1−/− cerebellum (Supplementary Materials Table S2). The most significantly downregulated gene was Prkcg, which is a calcium-activated serine/threonine-protein kinase that has been shown to be mutated in spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 [55]. Previous studies have also shown that Prkcg expression is enriched in Purkinje neurons and neuroprotective [56]; therefore, the decreased expression of Prkcg within the neurodegeneration-susceptible lobules III and VI of the Npc1−/− cerebellum could indicate that either this decreased expression predisposes Purkinje neurons within these regions to undergo cell death, or this decreased expression is occurring secondarily to the genetic insult and is only an early indicator of neuronal dysfunction.

We also performed an additional comparison for gene expression changes that occur only in lobule X of Npc1−/− mice, when compared to the same region of Npc1+/+ mice (Supplementary Materials Figure S2D). This comparison identified 40 genes that were differentially expressed exclusively in the region of the cerebellum that is spared from Purkinje neuron degeneration, and therefore these genes could confer a resistance to neurodegeneration to the cells of lobule X. Of the 40 genes differentially regulated in lobule X of Npc1−/− mice, 36 of these genes had increased expression in Npc1−/− mice (Supplementary Materials Table S3). The most significantly elevated gene exclusively found within lobule X of Npc1−/− mice was Thbs1, which encodes for the thrombospondin 1 protein. THBS1 is a glia-derived factor that promotes the formation of synapses and that may be neuroprotective [57], and decreased Thbs1 expression has been demonstrated as a marker of aging astrocytes within the cerebellum [58,59]. Therefore, it is possible that the increased expression of Thbs1 within lobule X of Npc1−/− confers some neuroprotection within the lobule by improving astrocyte function. Although the above comparisons identified some novel gene expression changes that were localized to specific lobules within the Npc1−/− cerebellum, we sought additional methods to find a priori changes in expression that may help delineate the molecular mechanism leading to the spatiotemporal Purkinje neuron degeneration within NPC1.

2.3. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis

To identify gene expression patterns that may correlate with the anterior to posterior Purkinje neuron death observed in Npc1−/− mice, a Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was performed on the RNA-seq data [34,60,61]. Fourteen different modules were detected through the WGCNA, and the eigengene for each module is depicted in Figure 2A. Using the eigengenes, the identified modules can be classified into two major groups based on gene expression among the Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples. The first group comprises eight different modules with NPC1-dependent (or disease-specific) expression patterns, in which the Npc1−/− expression is appreciably different from that of Npc1+/+. These eight modules were designated as NPC1-dependent-1–8. The second group, which contains six modules that have similar gene expression patterns when comparing Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples, were classified as having NPC1-independent expression patterns. These six modules were designated as NPC1-independent-1–6. Consistent with the principal component analysis (Figure 1E), the NPC1-independent expression modules contained the largest gene sets, as the NPC1-independent-1 module consisted of 3362 genes and the NPC1-independent-2 module consisted of 4448 genes (Figure 2B). These two large gene sets are distinguished by differential gene expression in lobule X relative to the anterior/central lobules, as the NPC1-independent-1 module is comprised of those genes with decreased expression in both Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− lobule X when compared to lobules III and VI, and the NPC1-independent-2 module consists of genes with increased expression in lobule X when compared to the lobules III and VI for both genotypes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA) of the RNA-sequencing data defined 14 distinct gene expression patterns in the Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− cerebellums from 4.5 weeks old mice. (A) The gene expression pattern, as depicted by an eigengene (a theoretical gene that describes the general pattern of the module), for each WGCNA module. The eight modules with a NPC1-dependent (or disease-specific) expression pattern, in which gene expression in different between the Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples, are depicted on the top half. The six modules with a NPC1-independent expression pattern, for which expression pattern changes across the lobules but not between the genotypes, are shown on the bottom. (B) The number of genes classified into each WGCNA module, with the percentage of genes in each module compared to the total in all modules shown in parenthesis.

2.3.1. NPC1-dependent Modules

To gain insight into the functional relevancy of the WGCNA modules, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was performed on the genes comprising each module. As a first analysis of the modules, networks comprising significant (p-value < 0.01) molecular and cellular functions were generated for each module. The functional network for the disease-specific NPC1-dependent-1 module (Figure 3A), whose eigengene demonstrates increased gene expression in all lobules of Npc1−/−, is highly interconnected and suggests that a common cell type or physiological response is responsible for the gene expression pattern of this module. This highly interconnected network results in a single functional cluster for the NPC1-dependent-1 module, which is represented by the most enriched term of cytotoxicity. All individual functions comprising this cluster appear to be directly or tangentially related to immune cell function, including leucocyte migration, proliferation of immune cells, and phagocytosis. Further pathway analysis showed a similar enrichment of pathways involved in the immune response, and the significantly enriched pathways for each module are provided in Supplementary Materials File S2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Functional enrichment for NPC1-dependent expression pattern modules. IPA functional analysis of the significantly enriched molecular and cellular functions for the selected disease-specific modules of NPC1-dependent-1 (A), NPC1-dependent-2 (B), NPC1-dependent-7 (C), and NPC1-dependent-8 (D). Each node represents a specific molecular and cellular function, the size of which corresponds to the number of genes included in each function. The thickness of the edges (lines connecting nodes) represent the number of shared genes between each function. Expression data is from 4.5 weeks old Npc1 control and mutant mice.

The disease-specific modules of NPC1-dependent-2–5 (Figure 3B, Supplementary Materials Figure S3A–C, respectively) show similar gene expression patterns to that of the NPC1-dependent-1 module, as all eigengenes showing elevated Npc1−/− gene expression across all lobules. All these clusters are related to cell movement, cell death, and immune activation. This demonstrates, in accordance in with previous publications [32,38,62], that the immune reaction appears to be homogenous throughout the cerebellum and therefore is not likely contributing to the pattered Purkinje neuron death observed in NPC1.

The remaining disease-specific modules, NPC1-dependent-6–8, have eigengenes characterized by decreased expression in the Npc1−/− samples across all lobules. The functional networks for both NPC1-dependent-6 (Supplementary Materials Figure S3D) and NPC1-dependent-7 (Figure 3C) modules show sparsely populated and disconnected networks with little functional enrichment. The only clusters for the NPC1-dependent-6 module contain the enrichments of reassembly of organelle, metabolism of carbohydrate, ploidy of cells, and transport of protein. Likewise, the NPC1-dependent-7 module contained four enriched clusters, including mitotic catastrophe, DNA damage response, autophagy, and ploidy of cells. The functional network for genes belonging to the NPC1-dependent-8 module (Figure 3D), however, shows multiple large functional clusters, the most populated of which are morphology of Purkinje neurons, neurodegeneration, and metabolism of lipid. As these terms are all directly related to the pathology of NPC1, this module is particularly noteworthy.

The NPC1-dependent-8 module demonstrates a general decrease in anterior to posterior gene expression across the lobules for both genotypes, combined with highly decreased gene expression of the Npc1−/− sample in lobules III and VI but a negligible decrease in expression of the Npc1−/− sample within lobule X. Taken together, the NPC1-dependent-8 module is composed of genes with an expression pattern that differentiates between anterior and posterior regions and is also enriched for functional terms related to general neurodegeneration and more specifically, NPC1 (morphology of Purkinje neurons and metabolism of lipid). Therefore, the genes of the NPC1-dependent-8 module were subjected to further IPA analysis. In total, 21 canonical pathways were found to be significantly enriched in the NPC1-dependent-8 module (Supplementary Materials Figure S4A). These include multiple pathways related to diacylglycerol and triacylglycerol biosynthesis (Supplementary Materials Figure S4B). This Npc1−/− specific downregulation of genes related to di-and-triacylglycerol is in accordance with previously published reports that show triglycerides are reduced in both Npc1−/− mouse serum and hepatocytes [63,64]. Although the exact mechanism leading to the downregulation of triglycerides remains to be elucidated, it has been suggested that oleic acid or acetate-derived carbons, which normally are incorporated into triglycerides, are preferentially shunted into the generation of cholesterol [64]. The data gathered from these RNA-seq results would additionally suggest that the genes leading to the generation triglycerides are downregulated in Npc1−/−, potentially enabling the preferential metabolic flux of carbons into cholesterol synthesis at the expense of diacylglycerols and triacylglycerols.

The canonical pathway analysis of genes included in the NPC1-dependent-8 module also includes Amyloid Processing, which is of interest because amyloid-β (Aβ) release is increased and shifted towards the Aβ-plaque forming Aβ42 isoform in NPC1 patients [65]. Visualization of the pathway shows that the Aβ gene (App), along with the β-secretase genes (Bace1 and Bace2), are included in the NPC1-dependent-8 module (Supplementary Materials Figure S5A). Additional network analysis of the NPC1-dependent-8 module showed a highly significant gene network (score = 63) containing 34 genes all converging on App (Supplementary Materials Figure S5B), suggesting that genes related to Aβ processing are altered in Npc1−/− and may contribute to the spatiotemporal neurodegeneration observed in the disease. More specifically, decreased β-secretase gene expression from anterior to posterior predicts possible decreased formation of Aβ-plaques in the posterior of the Npc1−/− cerebellum.

Previous studies have shown that β-secretase protein levels and activity are increased overall within the Npc1−/− cerebellum [66]. However, as the gene expression for Bace1 and Bace2 were included in the NPC1-dependent-8 module, we performed a β-secretase assay to determine if there was any lobule-specific alteration in β-secretase activity that could lead to decreased Aβ42 generation in the posterior lobules. Our results showed an increased activity in the anterior lobule of Npc1−/− samples, but this did not reach statistical significance when compared to the same lobules of the control mouse (Supplementary Materials Figure S5C). The nodular lobule X, however, showed a significant increase in β-secretase activity (p = 0.023) in Npc1−/− samples compared to Npc1+/+ samples. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between lobule III and lobule X of either genotype. These data are not reflective of the decreased Bace1 and Bace2 gene expression observed in lobule X of the Npc1−/−, as per our RNA-seq results, but rather may reflect a negative feedback loop due to the increased BACE1 protein levels previously reported in the Npc1−/− cerebellum [66].

2.3.2. NPC1-independent Expression Modules

The WGCNA analysis also identified six modules where the cerebellar lobule gene expression was similar in both control and mutant tissues. We classified these as NPC1-independent expression modules (NPC1-independent-1 – 6). These NPC1-independent expression models had pronounced alterations in gene expression across the lobules, but negligible differences between genotypes. Similarly to for the disease-specific modules, networks were created to identify biologically relevant terms and to determine which modules would be investigated further.

The NPC1-independent expression modules of NPC1-independent-5 and 6 (Supplementary Materials Figure S6A,B) do not contain gene expression patterns that differentiate between the anterior and posterior cerebellum. Furthermore, both modules are not significantly enriched in functional terms related to NPC1 (e.g., lipid metabolism, molecular transport, neurodegeneration, or neuronal morphology), and thus were not assessed further. In contrast to these modules, the NPC1-independent-3 and 4 modules (Figure 4A,B) display a significant and stepwise decrease or increase in gene expression from lobule III to X. Functional network analysis of the NPC1-independent-3 module shows the largest groupings being morphology of microvilli, metabolism of nucleotide, transport of cation, and transport of vesicles. Conversely, the NPC1-independent-4 module is comprised of functional groupings for cell-cell contact, metabolism of lipid, interphase of cells, and elongation of cells. Both NPC1-independent-3 and 4 modules contained enrichments of functional terms related to NPC1 (transport of vesicles and metabolism of lipid, respectively) and expression patterns that distinguish the anterior/central lobules to the nodular lobule. Therefore, these modules were subjected to further analysis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Functional enrichment for NPC1-independent-3 and 4 modules. IPA functional analysis of the significantly enriched molecular and cellular functions for the NPC1-independent-3 (A), and NPC1-independent-4 (B) modules. Each node represents a specific molecular and cellular function, the size of which corresponds to the number of genes included in each function. The edges represent the number of shared genes between each function. Expression data is from 4.5 weeks old Npc1 control and mutant mice.

As the NPC1-independent-3 and 4 modules demonstrated reciprocal expression patterns, the genes of both modules were combined for further pathway analysis. The utilization of genes with increased and decreased expression patterns across the lobules also enabled the use of a Z-score to determine the extent of activation (positive Z-score) or inhibition (negative Z-score) for each pathway, such that a positive Z-score indicates activation of that pathway in the posterior lobules and a negative Z-score indicates inhibition of the pathway in the posterior. In total, 40 pathways were significantly enriched in the combined NPC1-independent-3 and 4 modules, the top ten of which are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S7A and the significant pathways with the largest absolute Z-score are displayed in Supplementary Materials Figure S7B. The Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) Signaling pathway (Supplementary Materials Figure S7C), known to be critical for cerebellar patterning [67], is predicted to be increased in lobule X. Additionally, NPC1-specific abnormalities in SHH signaling have been described, leading to a reduction of ciliated cells in the Npc1−/− mice mouse brain [68]. During development, mRNA levels of Shh are decreased in Npc1−/− mice and likely results in defective proliferation of granule neurons within the cerebellum, as granule neuron proliferation is sustained by consistent levels of SHH [69]. Granule neuron function is important in the context of NPC1 and Purkinje neuron degeneration because they are the only excitatory neurons within the cerebellum and their parallel fibers within the molecular layer directly activate Purkinje neurons [70]. Therefore, the increase in SHH signaling as predicted by the pathway analysis of the NPC1-independent-3 and 4 modules may sustain granule neuron function and contribute to the survival of the Purkinje neurons within lobule X.

The functional network for the NPC1-independent-1 module, whose eigengene shows decreased expression specifically in lobule X of both Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/−, has multiple distinct functional clusters that are comprised of individual functions with large gene sets (Figure 5A). The most populated clusters for the NPC1-independent-1 module are cell death, branching of neurons, movement of neurons, and morphology of synapse. Similar groupings of functions related to neuronal morphology and cell death are also seen in the NPC1-independent-2 module (Figure 5B). The NPC1-independent-2 module has the inverse expression pattern of the NPC1-independent-1 module, with elevated gene expression in lobule X of both genotypes. The largest functional clusterings for the NPC1-independent-2 module include cell death, branching of neurons, cell movement, and formation of intercellular junctions. Taken together, the combined functional clusterings of the NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules demonstrate that the unique gene expression profile of lobule X leads to a significant enrichment for molecular and cellular function terms relating to neuronal morphology and cell death. Therefore, we further analyzed the genes from the NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules by functional and pathway analysis to determine how they may contribute to the posterior cerebellum’s resistance to neurodegeneration.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Functional enrichment for NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules. IPA functional analysis of the significantly enriched molecular and cellular functions for the NPC1-independent-1 (A) and NPC1-independent-2 (B) modules. Each node represents a specific molecular and cellular function, the size of which corresponds to the number of genes included in each function. The edges represent the number of shared genes between each function. Expression data is from 4.5 weeks old Npc1 control and mutant mice.

As both modules are distinct in the gene expression of lobule X, the genes of the NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules were combined for further pathway analysis to determine if the combination of genes act synergistically to contribute to the resistance to neurodegeneration seen in the posterior cerebellum. When combined, the genes of both modules generated 227 significantly enriched pathways. The top ten most significant pathways and those with the largest absolute Z-scores, with positive Z-scores indicating activation in lobule X and negative Z-scores indicating inhibition in lobule X, are displayed in Figure 6A,B. Included in the most significantly enriched pathways is that of Calcium Signaling. This pathway is of interest because calcium localization has been shown to be disrupted in NPC1, and furthermore, increases in cytosolic calcium levels have normalized the NPC1 cellular phenotype [5]. Examination of the Calcium Signaling pathway shows that numerous genes encoding both extracellular and intracellular calcium channels are altered in their gene expression pattern from the anterior to posterior cerebellum (Figure 6C). Although many genetic alterations are observed, almost all predict increased cytosolic concentration of calcium within lobule X. This suggests that increased cytosolic calcium levels may contribute to the cell survival in posterior cerebellum of NPC1, as calcium induces endosome-lysosome fusion and results in cellular protection in vitro [5,71].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

IPA canonical pathway analysis of the combined NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules. (A) The top ten most significant IPA canonical pathways enriched within the gene sets of the combined NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules. (B) The most significant IPA canonical pathways with Z-scores greater than 1.5 or less than -1.5. (C) The IPA canonical pathway for Calcium Signaling. Genes colored in red have increased expression in lobule X and those colored in green have decreased expression in lobule X, compared to the anterior lobules. The IPA generated molecular activity predictions are also depicted, with activation in lobule X depicted as orange lines and inhibition in lobule X depicted as blue lines. Gene expression predicting increased cytosolic calcium concentrations are highlighted in orange boxes, and gene expression predicting decreased cytosolic calcium are highlighted in blue boxes. Expression data is from 4.5 weeks old Npc1 control and mutant mice.

Other pathways within the NPC1-independent-1 and 2 combined modules with large Z-scores include those for Dopamine Receptor Signaling (Supplementary Materials Figure S8A) and Glutamate Receptor Signaling (Supplementary Materials Figure S8B). The Z-scores for both pathways are both highly positive, with scores of 2.11 and 2.50, respectively, thus representing activation of both pathways in lobule X when compared to the anterior lobules. Within the Dopamine Receptor Signaling pathway, multiple subtypes of dopamine receptors demonstrate increased expression in lobule X, including Drd2, Drd3, Drd4, and Drd5 (Supplementary Materials Figure S8A). The expression of dopamine receptors has been shown to be decreased within the posterior lobules of patients with Parkinson disease, and the observed increase may reflect differential neurotransmitter signaling that may be neuroprotective in the posterior and nodular regions of the cerebellum [72]. Another modified neurotransmitter signaling pathway is that of Glutamate Receptor Signaling (Supplementary Materials Figure S8B). As outlined in the pathway, many genes involved are expressed on glia cells and function to buffer extracellular glutamate, thus preventing excitotoxity from neighboring neurons [73]. This glutamate buffering is especially important at Purkinje neuron synapses as four out of the five glutamate transporters are localized to this region (GLAST/SLC1A3, EAAT2/SLC1A2, EAAT3/SLC1A1, and EAAT4/SLC1A6) [74,75,76]. Importantly, Slc1a2 and Slc1a6 are included in the NPC1-independent-2 module. Overall, the genes within the NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules indicated in this pathway may lead to increased glutamate buffering in lobule X, which in turn could lead to both decreased neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration.

As the functional networks for both the NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules show significant enrichment for functions related to cell death, further individual functional analysis was performed to determine if these functions coordinate to provide the neuroprotection observed in lobule X of the Npc1−/− mouse. All molecular and cellular functions classified into the categories of Cell Death or Cell Viability were isolated and plotted by Z-score (Figure 7A). All functions with a negative Z-score are related to cell death and specifically include the functions of degeneration of cells (−1.94), cell death of central nervous system cells (−1.479), and apoptosis of brain (−1.07). Additionally, all enriched functions related to cell survival had positive Z-scores, including cell survival (2.30), cell viability of tumor cell lines (2.13), and cell viability (1.88). Taken together, these results demonstrate a general inhibition of functions related to cell death in lobule X and an activation of functional terms related to cell survival in this same cerebellar region.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

IPA analysis of cell death and survival functions in the combined NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules. (A) IPA analysis of functions classified into the categories of cell death (purple bars) or cell survival (green bars). Negative Z-scores indicate inhibition in lobule X and Positive Z-scores indicate activation in lobule X. (B) Individual genes from the NPC1-independent-1 and 2 modules that were identified as increasing cell survival or increasing cell death. These genes were plotted against their average change in lobule III/VI to lobule X change in gene expression (log2 Fold Change) and the previously identified Purkinje neuron enrichment of gene expression (log2 IP/UB) [79]. The names for genes with a Purkinje neuron enrichment (log2 IP/UB > 1.5) and anterior or nodular specificity (log2 fold change < 1.5 for anterior or log2 fold change >1.5 for nodular) are noted. Expression data is from 4.5 weeks old Npc1 control and mutant mice.

Although the previous results suggest that lobule X is more resistant to cell death, it is unclear if this is due to cell-autonomous survival functions within the Purkinje neurons of lobule X, or if the neuroprotection observed is due to other cellular factors within the lobule. The cell-autonomous neurodegeneration of Purkinje neurons has previously been demonstrated, but the factors leading to the spatiotemporal loss of these cells has not been determined [77,78]. To find individual genes that may be directly contributing to the neuroprotection of Purkinje neurons in lobule X, all NPC1-independent-1 and 2 module genes that were classified into functions of Cell Death or Cell Viability were identified. The average change in anterior to posterior gene expression via our RNA-seq data was then plotted against the Purkinje neuron gene enrichment previously reported by Doyle and colleagues [79] (Figure 7B). This plot specifically identifies: (1) genes that have been classified via functional analysis as pro-survival (green circles), pro-death (purple triangles), or context-dependent (orange diamonds) because they were classified as being pro-death and pro-survival in separate individual functions, (2) genes that have previously been identified as enriched in Purkinje neurons, with increasing Purkinje neuron specificity (displayed as a log2 fold change in the mRNA immunoprecipitated from Purkinje neurons (IP) versus its expression in the remaining tissue sample (UB) [79]), along the y-axis, (3) genes that have the largest anterior-to-posterior changes in gene expression (x-axis), with negative values representing higher gene expression in lobule III and VI and positive values representing increased gene expression in lobule X. When plotted together, there does not seem to be a Purkinje-neuron specific expression pattern that can account for the increased survival of Purkinje neurons within lobule X, as the Purkinje neuron specific genes with largest increases in expression in lobule X were noted as being pro-death (Pla2g5) or context-dependent (Bub1 and F2r). Conversely, the Purkinje neuron specific genes with the highest anterior expression were noted as being pro-survival (Fgf7, Cd28, Nek2, and Myof). This result suggests that the Purkinje neuron neuroprotection observed within lobule X may not be cell autonomous.

The only exception to this is Cck, which is highly enriched in the Purkinje neurons of lobules III and VI and is classified as pro-death [80]. Cholecystokinin (CCK) is synthesized as a 115 amino acid prohormone that under post-translational processing to generate different biologically active CCK peptides. CCK33 is a 33 amino acid, gastrin-like peptide that was originally discovered in the gastrointestinal tract where it functions to increase gastric motility and induce the release of pancreatic enzymes [81]. Within the pancreas, CCK induces caspase activation, which leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and culminates in apoptosis [80]. In addition to its gastrointestinal functions, CCK is also one of the most abundant neuropeptides in the brain as the processed and sulfated form of CCK8 (CCK-8S) [82]. Within the brain, CCK-8S has been shown to modulate neuronal excitability by either directly acting as an excitatory neurotransmitter or by modulating the effects of other classical neurotransmitters [83,84]. Specifically, CCK-8S has been shown to suppress presynaptic GABA release in GABAergic interneurons and increase glutamate release from the hippocampus [85,86,87,88]. As CCK has been demonstrated to modulate both the apoptotic and neurotransmission pathways, and because of its anterior-enriched expression pattern in the cerebellum, CCK may contribute to the pathological cascade that predisposes the anterior lobules to early neurodegeneration.

2.4. Analysis of Purkinje Neuron Specific Transcripts

To determine if our RNA-seq data could identify lobule-specific changes in gene expression for Purkinje neuron enriched genes, we evaluated our data set against genes that have previously been identified using the Allen Brain Atlas as being both uniquely expressed in Purkinje neurons and differentially expressed between the anterior and nodular Purkinje neurons [89,90]. In accordance with previous studies, our RNA-seq data was able to detect differences in Purkinje neuron enriched genes that were previously described to have differences in anterior to posterior gene expression [89]. Examples of the gene expression patterns and corresponding in situ hybridization (ISH) images from the Allen Brain Atlas are included for genes with decreased expression in lobule X (Supplementary Materials Figure S9A,B) and increased expression in lobule X (Supplementary Materials Figure S9C,D). With this ability to accurately identify spatial differences in gene expression, we sought to identify additional novel Purkinje neuron specific genes that display a significant difference in lobule III/VI to lobule X cerebellar gene expression. Previous reports have identified genes that show enriched expression in Purkinje neurons [79] and additional studies have validated 38 of these as being Purkinje neuron specific [39]. From these 38 genes, we have identified 28 genes that are significantly up/downregulated in at least one comparison, either within the genotype comparisons or between the genotype comparisons. Specifically, we found 11 Purkinje neuron enriched genes that show no difference in gene expression when comparing between the lobules of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples but do have significant changes in expression when comparing between lobules III, VI, and X (Supplementary Materials Figure S10). Four of the genes (Slc1a6, Ebf1, Igfbp6, and Bean1) were found to have increased expression in lobule X when compared to lobules III/VI in both Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples (Supplementary Materials Figure S10A–D). This subset of genes includes Slc1a6, also known as EAAT4, which is one of the major glutamate transporters in the cerebellum and has previously been shown to be predominately expressed within the zebrin-II positive Purkinje neurons, which are preferentially found in the posterior lobules [76,91]. As described above, there are multiple changes in gene expression within the glutamate signaling pathway, and the highly significant increase in Slc1a6 expression may protect the Purkinje neurons of lobule X from excitotoxicity in the context of NPC1. Additionally, this subset of Purkinje neuron enriched genes includes 7 genes (Lmo7, Tgfb2, Homer3, Itpka, Dgkg, Kcnip1, and Cck) that have significantly decreased gene expression in lobule X when compared to lobules III/VI of the same genotype (Supplementary Materials Figure S10E–K).

In addition to those genes that showed no difference in expression between the genotypes, we also found 12 Purkinje neuron enriched genes that have differences in gene expression when comparing the same lobule between Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples (Supplementary Materials Figure S11). This includes two genes, Casq2 and Icmt, which were found to be significantly decreased in lobules III, VI, and X of the Npc1−/− cerebellum (Supplementary Materials Figure S11A,B). Two other genes (Col18a1 and Ryr1) were found to be decreased in lobules III and VI of the Npc1−/− cerebellum (Supplementary Materials Figure S11C,D). Ryr1 functions as a calcium release channel and has been reported to play a pivotal role in maintaining dendritic elongation of Purkinje neurons [92]. Eight additional genes (Ppp1r17, Calb1, Ptprr, B3gnt5, Ebf2, Rgs8, Atp2a3, and Doc2b) were found to have decreased expression when comparing the anterior to posterior lobules of the Npc1+/+ cerebellum but were also determined to have a significant decrease in gene expression between Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples within lobule III (Supplementary Materials Figure S11E–L). These genes include Calb1, which is widely used as a marker of Purkinje neurons, and is of interest because immunofluorescence staining for CALB1 at this same time point (4.5 weeks of age) reveals no difference in Purkinje neuron density (Figure 1B). Therefore, this decrease may represent an early indicator of neurodegeneration that predates any disease-related pathological changes within the cerebellum.

In addition to the previous expression patterns, we also observed a set of seven Purkinje neuron enriched genes (Trpc3, Lhx5, Cacna1g, Bcl11a, Grik1, Ptpn2, and Igfbp3) that have no changes in gene expression across the lobules of the Npc1+/+ samples but significantly decreased expression between Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples within lobule III (Supplementary Materials Figure S12). This set of genes included Lhx5, which is a transcriptional regulator that is required for Purkinje neuron development and differentiation [93]. Similar to the decrease in Calb1 expression previously described, this Npc1−/− specific decrease of Lhx5 within lobule III may be an earlier sign of neurodegeneration within the anterior cerebellum. Alternatively, these decreases in gene expression that were strictly restricted to lobule III Npc1−/−(observed in 14 out of 28 genes) could also predispose these cells to neurodegeneration.

To determine if these Npc1−/− specific decreases of Purkinje neuron gene expression within the anterior lobules represent the source of neurodegeneration, or merely the effect of impending degeneration, the larger set of Purkinje neuron enriched genes previously described by Doyle et al. were observed for their inclusion within our WGCNA analysis (Figure 8). This allowed us to surmise the gene expression pattern for each Purkinje neuron enriched gene based on the representative eigengene expression pattern for each module. After the modular inclusion was determined for each gene, an odds ratio was calculated of the relative number of Purkinje neuron enriched genes per module to the relative size of each module. The log2 of this odds ratio was then taken to evenly distribute the results around zero, with ratios greater than zero representing of an overrepresentation of Purkinje neuron enriched genes within the module. The modules with the highest overrepresentation of Purkinje neuron enriched genes were the NPC1-dependent-6, NPC1-dependent-7, and NPC1-dependent-8 modules. Interestingly, these three modules are the only ones in which the eigengene pattern depicts lower expression in Npc1−/− samples across the lobules (Figure 2A). In particular, the NPC1-dependent-6 eigengene shows a substantial decrease in Npc1−/− lobule III gene expression when compared to Npc1+/+, and only modest decreases in Npc1−/− gene expression between lobules III and VI when compared to those of Npc1+/+. These results are similar to those described within Supplementary Materials Figure S11, as an overrepresented sample of Purkinje neuron enriched genes demonstrate an expression pattern that is significantly decreased exclusively between Npc1−/− lobule III when compared to the same region of Npc1+/+. It is unlikely that the decreased expression of this large cohort of genes is required to predispose the anterior region of the cerebellum for neurodegeneration. However, it is more likely that this widespread decrease in Purkinje neuron enriched gene expression with the anterior cerebellum of Npc1−/− is an early indicator of damaged Purkinje neurons that will undergo neurodegeneration in the near future.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

WGCNA module enrichment for Purkinje neuron enriched genes. For each WGCNA module, the percentage of Purkinje neuron enriched genes within that module compared to the total number of Purkinje neuron enriched genes is depicted as the numerator. The denominator is the percentage of genes within each WGCNA when compared to the total number of genes in all WGCNA modules. Modules with a log2 ratio of these two percentages greater than zero represent an overrepresentation of the number of Purkinje neuron enriched genes within that module, based on module size. Modules with a negative score have a paucity of Purkinje neuron enriched genes within that module, based on module size. Expression data is from 4.5 weeks old Npc1 control and mutant mice.

3. Discussion

In this study, RNA-sequencing was used to characterize spatial gene expression profiles of genes involved in patterned cerebellar degeneration observed in Npc1−/− mice. Specifically, the study sought to identify novel pathways associated with Purkinje neuron death, a highly affected cell type in NPC1. Based on our analysis, we compared gene expression changes between the lobules of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice and changes within the lobules of each genotype. To our surprise, most of the significant difference in gene expression were observed between lobules III/VI and lobule X within each genotype (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). These observations were unexpected, as we anticipated finding significant changes in gene expression between Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− that could potentially explain the differences in neuronal survival observed in the NPC1 mouse model.

Genes differentially expressed between Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− samples revealed an overwhelming enrichment for genes related to the immune response and inflammation (see NPC1-dependent-1–4 modules of the WGCNA). Most of these genes show increased expression in Npc1−/− regardless of lobule, thus demonstrating that the immune response is ubiquitous throughout the cerebellum, in accordance with previous studies [36,94]. Although the immune response precedes any neurological symptoms (~2 weeks of age in mice) [32], modulation of the immune response by genetic deletion of both innate and adaptive immune related genes has shown little to modest effects on NPC1 disease progression [62,94,95,96]. These data, along with our work demonstrating ubiquitous cerebellar immune system activation, suggests that the inflammatory response is unlikely to underlie the patterned Purkinje neuron death observed in NPC1. Analysis of the other disease-specific WGCNA modules (NPC1-dependent-5–8) failed to identify any other pathways that could readily explain the patterned Purkinje neuron death observed in NPC1. These results suggest that the spatiotemporal pattern of Purkinje neuron degeneration is not the result of disease specific changes in the transcriptome.

Analysis of genes with different anterior/central lobule to nodular lobule expression patterns shows a multitude of potential reasons for neuroprotective nature of the Purkinje neurons within lobule X, including increased calcium signaling (Figure 6C), increased SHH signaling (Supplementary Materials Figure S7C), and increased glutamate buffering (Supplementary Materials Figure S8B). Most directly, functional analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in neuronal related cell death functions in lobule X and a concurrent increase in cell survival functions within this region (Figure 7A). As the Purkinje neurons are the most prominently affected cells in NPC1, we then sought to determine if there were genetic alterations intrinsic to Purkinje neurons that could explain the spatial differences in neurodegeneration; however, when restricted to Purkinje neuron enriched genes, there was only a single gene, Cck, that was classified as pro-death that was also enriched in expression in neurodegeneration susceptible lobules III and VI (Figure 7B). These results suggest that there are not cell-specific transcriptomic changes that are driving the neuroprotection of Purkinje neurons within lobule X, but rather that the overall environment of lobule X may drive the neuroprotection of Purkinje neurons within this specific region of the cerebellum.

This study has demonstrated that there are expansive and significant changes in gene expression between lobules III/VI and lobule X. The number of genes with significant changes in gene expression between anterior/central lobule compared to nodular lobule is over 10-fold higher than those comparisons done between the lobules of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). These large changes highlight the complexity of the cerebellum and the rigid regionality defined within it. Further studies are needed to determine whether the vast transcriptomic changes between the anterior/central and nodular cerebellar regions cause the difference in neurodegeneration observed between the regions.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to look at transcriptome-wide changes in gene expression between different cerebellar regions. To aid in the accessibility of this dataset, the gene expression results generated from this study are provided in interactive, web-based viewer at https://porterlab.shinyapps.io/cerebellarlobules/. Via this website, gene expression across the cerebellar lobules, and corresponding fold change comparisons, can be visualized for individual genes of interest.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

All animal work conformed to the National Institutes of Health guidelines and was approved by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Heterozygous Npc1+/- mice (BALB/cNctr-Npc1m1N/J strain) were intercrossed to obtain control (Npc1+/+) and mutant (Npc1−/−) littermates. PCR genotyping was performed using tail DNA as previously described [97]. Mice were euthanized at 4.5 weeks of age by CO2 asphyxiation, transcardially perfused with phosphate buffered saline containing RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the isolated cerebella were stored at −80 °C. The frozen cerebella of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice were then microdissected on a bed of dry ice to isolate the anterior lobule III, the central lobule VI, as well as nodular lobule X. Lobules from three male and three female Npc1+/+ or Npc1−/− mice were pooled together per each sample. A total of three pooled samples were collected for lobules III and VI, while four pooled samples were used for lobule X.

4.2. RNA-Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from the lobule pools by homogenization in TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by further purification and concentration using RNeasy Mini Columns (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The quality and the quantity of RNA were assessed using both a Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA (10 µg) was rRNA depleted in a twostep process first utilizing the Ambion RiboMinus Eukaryotes version 2 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), as per manufacture instructions, followed by depletion using the Low Input RiboMinus Eukaryotes version 2 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). rRNA-depleted RNA quality and concentration was verified after depletion by BioAnalyzer and Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) before proceeding to the library construction. Redundant cDNA library preparations were generated using the AB Library Builder System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) on 300 ng of rRNA-depleted RNA, with a SOLiD total RNA-sequencing kit for paired-end reads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). To reduce the potential for batch artifacts, the samples were randomly split into two pools, comprised of ten samples each. Following cleanup, the beads were deposited onto 12 lanes per pool and run on a SOLiD 5500 Sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) generating 75 bp by 50 bp paired-end reads. After sequencing, the color-space data was demultiplexed and aligned against the UCSC GRCm38/mm10 mouse genome with LifeScope using the paired-end whole transcriptome module (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.3. Gene Expression Analyses

Raw read count tables were loaded into R (version 3.6.0) and differential expression analysis was conducted via DESeq2 (version 1.24.0), using the default parameters unless otherwise noted [98]. The raw reads were normalized and transformed using DESeq2′s regularized log (rlog) function, which was modeled with an experiment-wide trend of variance. The resulting rlog normalized counts were used for all subsequent depictions of gene count data. To test for differences in gene expression, pairwise contrasts were modeled for the comparisons of interest. Genes were considered significant if the adjusted p-values were less than 0.05, and as such, the independent filtering significance cutoff (alpha) was set to 0.05. To reduce the logarithmic fold changes for genes with high variability or low counts, the approximate posterior estimation for generalized linear model (apeglm) shrinkage estimator was utilized to obtain all log2-fold changes for each pairwise comparison [99]. Differential expression was defined by post-hoc filtering of adjusted p-value < 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold change >0.58 (corresponding to a fold change >1.5 in either direction). Principal component analysis was performed on normalized counts after surrogate variable analysis, using the sva package (version 3.28.0), was performed to remove unwanted variation from batch effects [100].

4.4. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis

The resulting counts tables were loaded into R (version 3.5.1). The supplemental methods provide a detailed description of the methods used; here we briefly describe the workflow. First, genes with fewer than 10 reads in more than 15 samples were removed from analysis. Counts data were transformed using DESeq2′s rlog function. Surrogate variable analysis (sva, v3.28.0) was used to remove unwanted variation based on the study design and the detected surrogate variables were regressed out of the normalized count matrix. The normalized, SVA-corrected data were used in WGCNA analysis using the blockwiseModules function (see Supplemental methods for parameter details). For each gene, we report the kME (correlation of a gene with the eigengene of the module) across all modules, the p-value across all modules, the module assigned by WGCNA, and whether the WGCNA-assigned module had the best p-value or kME for that module.

4.5. Pathway Analysis

Pathway analysis was performed on the WGCNA modules using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis). The analysis was performed using the default settings, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all enriched pathways. Pathways were annotated using the molecular activity predictor within the IPA software.

Functional analysis was performed on all individual functions that are classified into one of the 33 categories that comprise the class of molecular and cellular functions, as defined within the IPA. Functional enrichment analysis of the molecular and cellular functions was performed with Cytoscape (version 3.6.0), using the EnrichmentMap app (version 3.1.0) [101]. Enrichment maps were generated with the number of nodes, representing individual functions, limited to a p-value cutoff of 0.01. The edges, representing the number of shared genes between each pair of functions, were set with the automatic setting and using the Overlap metric with a cutoff of 0.75. Functional clusters and labels were generated using the AutoAnnotate app (version 1.2) [102]. Clusters were annotated using the MCL Cluster algorithm, and labels were generated with the WordCloud: Adjacent Words algorithm, with the adjacent word bonus set at the default setting of 8. A maximum of four words were generated for each label, and these four words were edited down to create a coherent descriptor for each cluster.

4.6. Immunohistochemistry

Brain tissues for immunohistochemical analysis were processed as described previously [103]. Briefly, Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice at 4.5 weeks of were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The brains were post-fixed for 24 h, then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose until the tissues sank. The brains were then sectioned parasagittally (20 µm) with a cryostat and the sections were collected in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBSTx) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For calbindin staining, sections were blocked for one hour at room temperature with PBSTx supplemented with 10% goat serum (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody and detected with fluorescently labeled secondary antibody. All sections were counterstained using Hoescht 33342 (1:5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific), mounted and cover-slipped with Mowiol 4-88 mounting medium (Sigma Aldrich). The primary antibody used was anti-calbindin (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), with the corresponding secondary antibody of Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit (1:5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.7. β-secretase Assay

β-secretase activity was assayed using a β-Secretase Activity Fluorometric Assay Kit (Sigma Aldrich). Cerebellar lobule samples were isolated from Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice as described above, suspended in Extraction Buffer, and individual lobule lysates were prepared using a motor-driven pestle. For each lobule, four replicates of 10 µg lysate were loaded into a 96 well plate, and the assay was run according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The fluorometric results were obtained on a FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) with an excitation of 355 nm and an emission of 520 nm.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Each data set was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and statistical significance was determined using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test between individual samples. The adjusted p-value, which is corrected for multiple comparisons, was utilized and a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant. All statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism software.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Molecular Genomics Core at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for RNA library preparation and sequencing.

Abbreviations

NPC Niemann-Pick disease, type C
NPC1 Niemann-Pick disease, type C1
WGCNA Weighted gene co-expression network analysis
RNA-seq RNA-sequencing
PCA Principal component analysis
IPA Ingenuity Pathway Analysis
Amyloid-β
SHH Sonic Hedgehog
CCK Cholecystokinin
ISH In situ hybridization
PBS Phosphate buffered saline

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/1/292/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.B.M., I.M.W., C.A.W., F.D.P.; Data Curation, K.B.M., R.K.D.; Formal Analysis, K.B.M., R.K.D., J.R.I.; Funding Acquisition, F.D.P.; Investigation, K.B.M., I.M.W., C.V.C., A.C., C.A.W.; Methodology, K.B.M., I.M.W., C.V.C., F.D.P.; Resources, K.B.M., I.M.W., C.V.C., A.C.; Software, K.B.M.; Supervision, F.D.P.; Visualization, K.B.M., R.K.D.; Writing—Original Draft, K.B.M.; Writing—Review & Editing, K.B.M., A.C., R.K.D., N.X.C., F.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received support from the intramural research program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Patterson M.C., Mengel E., Wijburg F.A., Muller A., Schwierin B., Drevon H., Vanier M.T., Pineda M. Disease and patient characteristics in NP-C patients: Findings from an international disease registry. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2013;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vanier M.T. Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2010;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Naureckiene S., Sleat D.E., Lackland H., Fensom A., Vanier M.T., Wattiaux R., Jadot M., Lobel P. Identification of HE1 as the second gene of Niemann-Pick C disease. Science. 2000;290:2298–2301. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Walkley S.U., Suzuki K. Consequences of NPC1 and NPC2 loss of function in mammalian neurons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1685:48–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lloyd-Evans E., Morgan A.J., He X., Smith D.A., Elliot-Smith E., Sillence D.J., Churchill G.C., Schuchman E.H., Galione A., Platt F.M. Niemann-Pick disease type C1 is a sphingosine storage disease that causes deregulation of lysosomal calcium. Nat. Med. 2008;14:1247–1255. doi: 10.1038/nm.1876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sevin M., Lesca G., Baumann N., Millat G., Lyon-Caen O., Vanier M.T., Sedel F. The adult form of Niemann-Pick disease type C. Brain A J. Neurol. 2007;130:120–133. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Apps R., Hawkes R. Cerebellar cortical organization: A one-map hypothesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;10:670–681. doi: 10.1038/nrn2698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brochu G., Maler L., Hawkes R. Zebrin II: A polypeptide antigen expressed selectively by Purkinje cells reveals compartments in rat and fish cerebellum. J. Comp. Neurol. 1990;291:538–552. doi: 10.1002/cne.902910405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sillitoe R.V., Hawkes R. Whole-mount immunohistochemistry: A high-throughput screen for patterning defects in the mouse cerebellum. J. Histochem. Cytochem. Off. J. Histochem. Soc. 2002;50:235–244. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ahn A.H., Dziennis S., Hawkes R., Herrup K. The cloning of zebrin II reveals its identity with aldolase C. Development. 1994;120:2081–2090. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.8.2081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Armstrong C.L., Hawkes R. Pattern formation in the cerebellar cortex. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2000;78:551–562. doi: 10.1139/o00-071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ozol K., Hayden J.M., Oberdick J., Hawkes R. Transverse zones in the vermis of the mouse cerebellum. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999;412:95–111. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990913)412:1&#x0003c;95::AID-CNE7&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sarna J.R., Hawkes R. Patterned Purkinje cell death in the cerebellum. Prog. Neurobiol. 2003;70:473–507. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(03)00114-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang T., Morgan J.I. The Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mouse: An unexpected molecular link between neuronal degeneration and regeneration. Brain Res. 2007;1140:26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fletcher C.F., Lutz C.M., O’Sullivan T.N., Shaughnessy J.D., Jr., Hawkes R., Frankel W.N., Copeland N.G., Jenkins N.A. Absence epilepsy in tottering mutant mice is associated with calcium channel defects. Cell. 1996;87:607–617. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81381-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Duffin C.A., McFarland R., Sarna J.R., Vogel M.W., Armstrong C.L. Heat shock protein 25 expression and preferential Purkinje cell survival in the lurcher mutant mouse cerebellum. J. Comp. Neurol. 2010;518:1892–1907. doi: 10.1002/cne.22309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O’Hearn E., Molliver M.E. Degeneration of Purkinje cells in parasagittal zones of the cerebellar vermis after treatment with ibogaine or harmaline. Neuroscience. 1993;55:303–310. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90500-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Winkelman M.D., Hines J.D. Cerebellar degeneration caused by high-dose cytosine arabinoside: A clinicopathological study. Ann. Neurol. 1983;14:520–527. doi: 10.1002/ana.410140505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ciesielski K.T., Yanofsky R., Ludwig R.N., Hill D.E., Hart B.L., Astur R.S., Snyder T. Hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis and cognitive deficits in survivors of childhood leukemia. Arch. Neurol. 1994;51:985–993. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540220031012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Torvik A., Torp S. The prevalence of alcoholic cerebellar atrophy. A morphometric and histological study of an autopsy material. J. Neurol. Sci. 1986;75:43–51. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(86)90049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yokota O., Tsuchiya K., Terada S., Oshima K., Ishizu H., Matsushita M., Kuroda S., Akiyama H. Alcoholic cerebellar degeneration: A clinicopathological study of six Japanese autopsy cases and proposed potential progression pattern in the cerebellar lesion. Neuropathol. Off. J. Jpn. Soc. Neuropathol. 2007;27:99–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2006.00748.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ferrer I., Fabregues I., Pineda M., Gracia I., Ribalta T. A Golgi study of cerebellar atrophy in human chronic alcoholism. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1984;10:245–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1984.tb00357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Robitaille Y., Schut L., Kish S.J. Structural and immunocytochemical features of olivopontocerebellar atrophy caused by the spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA-1) mutation define a unique phenotype. Acta Neuropathol. 1995;90:572–581. doi: 10.1007/BF00318569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fletcher C.F., Tottene A., Lennon V.A., Wilson S.M., Dubel S.J., Paylor R., Hosford D.A., Tessarollo L., McEnery M.W., Pietrobon D., et al. Dystonia and cerebellar atrophy in Cacna1a null mice lacking P/Q calcium channel activity. FASEB J. 2001;15:1288–1290. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0562fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gilman S. The spinocerebellar ataxias. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2000;23:296–303. doi: 10.1097/00002826-200011000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iwata M., Hirano A., French J.H. Degeneration of the cerebellar system in X-chromosome-linked copper malabsorption. Ann. Neurol. 1979;5:542–549. doi: 10.1002/ana.410050609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aynaci F.M., Mocan H., Bahadir S., Sari A., Aksoy A. A case of Menkes’ syndrome associated with deafness and inferior cerebellar vermian hypoplasia. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86:121–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sarna J., Miranda S.R., Schuchman E.H., Hawkes R. Patterned cerebellar Purkinje cell death in a transgenic mouse model of Niemann Pick type A/B disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001;13:1873–1880. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01564.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Higashi Y., Murayama S., Pentchev P.G., Suzuki K. Cerebellar degeneration in the Niemann-Pick type C mouse. Acta Neuropathol. 1993;85:175–184. doi: 10.1007/BF00227765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tanaka J., Nakamura H., Miyawaki S. Cerebellar involvement in murine sphingomyelinosis: A new model of Niemann-Pick disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1988;47:291–300. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198805000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sarna J.R., Larouche M., Marzban H., Sillitoe R.V., Rancourt D.E., Hawkes R. Patterned Purkinje cell degeneration in mouse models of Niemann-Pick type C disease. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003;456:279–291. doi: 10.1002/cne.10522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Baudry M., Yao Y., Simmons D., Liu J., Bi X. Postnatal development of inflammation in a murine model of Niemann-Pick type C disease: Immunohistochemical observations of microglia and astroglia. Exp. Neurol. 2003;184:887–903. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00345-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Williams I.M., Wallom K.L., Smith D.A., Al Eisa N., Smith C., Platt F.M. Improved neuroprotection using miglustat, curcumin and ibuprofen as a triple combination therapy in Niemann-Pick disease type C1 mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014;67:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Langfelder P., Horvath S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cluzeau C.V., Watkins-Chow D.E., Fu R., Borate B., Yanjanin N., Dail M.K., Davidson C.D., Walkley S.U., Ory D.S., Wassif C.A., et al. Microarray expression analysis and identification of serum biomarkers for Niemann-Pick disease, type C1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012;21:3632–3646. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liao G., Wen Z., Irizarry K., Huang Y., Mitsouras K., Darmani M., Leon T., Shi L., Bi X. Abnormal gene expression in cerebellum of Npc1−/− mice during postnatal development. Brain Res. 2010;1325:128–140. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Alam M.S., Getz M., Safeukui I., Yi S., Tamez P., Shin J., Velazquez P., Haldar K. Genomic expression analyses reveal lysosomal, innate immunity proteins, as disease correlates in murine models of a lysosomal storage disorder. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e48273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cougnoux A., Drummond R.A., Collar A.L., Iben J.R., Salman A., Westgarth H., Wassif C.A., Cawley N.X., Farhat N.Y., Ozato K., et al. Microglia activation in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 is amendable to therapeutic intervention. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018;27:2076–2089. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mancarci B.O., Toker L., Tripathy S.J., Li B., Rocco B., Sibille E., Pavlidis P. Cross-Laboratory Analysis of Brain Cell Type Transcriptomes with Applications to Interpretation of Bulk Tissue Data. eNeuro. 2017;4 doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lin X., Antalffy B., Kang D., Orr H.T., Zoghbi H.Y. Polyglutamine expansion down-regulates specific neuronal genes before pathologic changes in SCA1. Nat. Neurosci. 2000;3:157–163. doi: 10.1038/72101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Knollmann B.C., Chopra N., Hlaing T., Akin B., Yang T., Ettensohn K., Knollmann B.E., Horton K.D., Weissman N.J., Holinstat I., et al. Casq2 deletion causes sarcoplasmic reticulum volume increase, premature Ca2+ release, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J. Clin. Investig. 2006;116:2510–2520. doi: 10.1172/JCI29128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Neidert N., von Ehr A., Zoller T., Spittau B. Microglia-Specific Expression of Olfml3 Is Directly Regulated by Transforming Growth Factor beta1-Induced Smad2 Signaling. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1728. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Majer A., Medina S.J., Sorensen D., Martin M.J., Frost K.L., Phillipson C., Manguiat K., Booth S.A. The cell type resolved mouse transcriptome in neuron-enriched brain tissues from the hippocampus and cerebellum during prion disease. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37715-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mathys H., Adaikkan C., Gao F., Young J.Z., Manet E., Hemberg M., De Jager P.L., Ransohoff R.M., Regev A., Tsai L.H. Temporal Tracking of Microglia Activation in Neurodegeneration at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Rep. 2017;21:366–380. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.German D.C., Liang C.L., Song T., Yazdani U., Xie C., Dietschy J.M. Neurodegeneration in the Niemann-Pick C mouse: Glial involvement. Neuroscience. 2002;109:437–450. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00517-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hess E.J., Wilson M.C. Tottering and leaner mutations perturb transient developmental expression of tyrosine hydroxylase in embryologically distinct Purkinje cells. Neuron. 1991;6:123–132. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90127-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sawada K., Komatsu S., Haga H., Sun X.Z., Hisano S., Fukui Y. Abnormal expression of tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in cerebellar cortex of ataxic mutant mice. Brain Res. 1999;829:107–112. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01347-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jeong Y.G., Kim M.K., Hawkes R. Ectopic expression of tyrosine hydroxylase in Zebrin II immunoreactive Purkinje cells in the cerebellum of the ataxic mutant mouse, pogo. Dev. Brain Res. 2001;129:201–209. doi: 10.1016/S0165-3806(01)00212-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yadid G., Sotnik-Barkai I., Tornatore C., Baker-Cairns B., Harvey-White J., Pentchev P.G., Goldin E. Neurochemical alterations in the cerebellum of a murine model of Niemann-Pick type C disease. Brain Res. 1998;799:250–256. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00449-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abbott L.C., Isaacs K.R., Heckroth J.A. Co-localization of tyrosine hydroxylase and zebrin II immunoreactivities in Purkinje cells of the mutant mice, tottering and tottering/leaner. Neuroscience. 1996;71:461–475. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00444-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sawada K., Sakata-Haga H., Fukui Y. Alternating array of tyrosine hydroxylase and heat shock protein 25 immunopositive Purkinje cell stripes in zebrin II-defined transverse zone of the cerebellum of rolling mouse Nagoya. Brain Res. 2010;1343:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kilbourne E.J., Nankova B.B., Lewis E.J., McMahon A., Osaka H., Sabban D.B., Sabban E.L. Regulated expression of the tyrosine hydroxylase gene by membrane depolarization. Identification of the responsive element and possible second messengers. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:7563–7569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nankova B., Hiremagalur B., Menezes A., Zeman R., Sabban E. Promoter elements and second messenger pathways involved in transcriptional activation of tyrosine hydroxylase by ionomycin. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1996;35:164–172. doi: 10.1016/0169-328X(95)00201-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nagamoto-Combs K., Piech K.M., Best J.A., Sun B., Tank A.W. Tyrosine hydroxylase gene promoter activity is regulated by both cyclic AMP-responsive element and AP1 sites following calcium influx. Evidence for cyclic amp-responsive element binding protein-independent regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:6051–6058. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.9.6051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen D.H., Brkanac Z., Verlinde C.L., Tan X.J., Bylenok L., Nochlin D., Matsushita M., Lipe H., Wolff J., Fernandez M., et al. Missense mutations in the regulatory domain of PKC gamma: A new mechanism for dominant nonepisodic cerebellar ataxia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;72:839–849. doi: 10.1086/373883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chopra R., Wasserman A.H., Pulst S.M., De Zeeuw C.I., Shakkottai V.G. Protein kinase C activity is a protective modifier of Purkinje neuron degeneration in cerebellar ataxia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018;27:1396–1410. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tran N.M., Shekhar K., Whitney I.E., Jacobi A., Benhar I., Hong G., Yan W., Adiconis X., Arnold M.E., Lee J.M., et al. Single-Cell Profiles of Retinal Ganglion Cells Differing in Resilience to Injury Reveal Neuroprotective Genes. Neuron. 2019;104:1039–1055.e1012. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Boisvert M.M., Erikson G.A., Shokhirev M.N., Allen N.J. The Aging Astrocyte Transcriptome from Multiple Regions of the Mouse Brain. Cell Rep. 2018;22:269–285. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cheng C., Lau S.K., Doering L.C. Astrocyte-secreted thrombospondin-1 modulates synapse and spine defects in the fragile X mouse model. Mol. Brain. 2016;9:74. doi: 10.1186/s13041-016-0256-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang B., Horvath S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Boil. 2005;4 doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Langfelder P., Horvath S. Fast R Functions for Robust Correlations and Hierarchical Clustering. J. Stat. Softw. 2012;46:46. doi: 10.18637/jss.v046.i11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lopez M.E., Klein A.D., Scott M.P. Complement is dispensable for neurodegeneration in Niemann-Pick disease type C. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012;9:216. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kulinski A., Vance J.E. Lipid homeostasis and lipoprotein secretion in Niemann-Pick C1-deficient hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:1627–1637. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610001200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Uronen R.L., Lundmark P., Orho-Melander M., Jauhiainen M., Larsson K., Siegbahn A., Wallentin L., Zethelius B., Melander O., Syvanen A.C., et al. Niemann-Pick C1 modulates hepatic triglyceride metabolism and its genetic variation contributes to serum triglyceride levels. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010;30:1614–1620. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mattsson N., Zetterberg H., Bianconi S., Yanjanin N.M., Fu R., Mansson J.E., Porter F.D., Blennow K. Gamma-secretase-dependent amyloid-beta is increased in Niemann-Pick type C: A cross-sectional study. Neurology. 2011;76:366–372. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318208f4ab. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kodam A., Maulik M., Peake K., Amritraj A., Vetrivel K.S., Thinakaran G., Vance J.E., Kar S. Altered levels and distribution of amyloid precursor protein and its processing enzymes in Niemann-Pick type C1-deficient mouse brains. Glia. 2010;58:1267–1281. doi: 10.1002/glia.21001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lewis P.M., Gritli-Linde A., Smeyne R., Kottmann A., McMahon A.P. Sonic hedgehog signaling is required for expansion of granule neuron precursors and patterning of the mouse cerebellum. Dev. Biol. 2004;270:393–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Canterini S., Dragotto J., Dardis A., Zampieri S., De Stefano M.E., Mangia F., Erickson R.P., Fiorenza M.T. Shortened primary cilium length and dysregulated Sonic hedgehog signaling in Niemann-Pick C1 disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017;26:2277–2289. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nusca S., Canterini S., Palladino G., Bruno F., Mangia F., Erickson R.P., Fiorenza M.T. A marked paucity of granule cells in the developing cerebellum of the Npc1(−/−) mouse is corrected by a single injection of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014;70:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.D’Angelo E., Mazzarello P., Prestori F., Mapelli J., Solinas S., Lombardo P., Cesana E., Gandolfi D., Congi L. The cerebellar network: From structure to function and dynamics. Brain Res. Rev. 2011;66:5–15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Efthymiou A.G., Steiner J., Pavan W.J., Wincovitch S., Larson D.M., Porter F.D., Rao M.S., Malik N. Rescue of an in vitro neuron phenotype identified in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons by modulating the WNT pathway and calcium signaling. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2015;4:230–238. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hurley M.J., Mash D.C., Jenner P. Markers for dopaminergic neurotransmission in the cerebellum in normal individuals and patients with Parkinson’s disease examined by RT-PCR. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003;18:2668–2672. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Takayasu Y., Iino M., Takatsuru Y., Tanaka K., Ozawa S. Functions of glutamate transporters in cerebellar Purkinje cell synapses. Acta Physiol. 2009;197:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.02019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chaudhry F.A., Lehre K.P., van Lookeren Campagne M., Ottersen O.P., Danbolt N.C., Storm-Mathisen J. Glutamate transporters in glial plasma membranes: Highly differentiated localizations revealed by quantitative ultrastructural immunocytochemistry. Neuron. 1995;15:711–720. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lehre K.P., Danbolt N.C. The number of glutamate transporter subtype molecules at glutamatergic synapses: Chemical and stereological quantification in young adult rat brain. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 1998;18:8751–8757. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-21-08751.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dehnes Y., Chaudhry F.A., Ullensvang K., Lehre K.P., Storm-Mathisen J., Danbolt N.C. The glutamate transporter EAAT4 in rat cerebellar Purkinje cells: A glutamate-gated chloride channel concentrated near the synapse in parts of the dendritic membrane facing astroglia. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 1998;18:3606–3619. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03606.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Elrick M.J., Pacheco C.D., Yu T., Dadgar N., Shakkottai V.G., Ware C., Paulson H.L., Lieberman A.P. Conditional Niemann-Pick C mice demonstrate cell autonomous Purkinje cell neurodegeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010;19:837–847. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ko D.C., Milenkovic L., Beier S.M., Manuel H., Buchanan J., Scott M.P. Cell-autonomous death of cerebellar purkinje neurons with autophagy in Niemann-Pick type C disease. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:81–95. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Doyle J.P., Dougherty J.D., Heiman M., Schmidt E.F., Stevens T.R., Ma G., Bupp S., Shrestha P., Shah R.D., Doughty M.L., et al. Application of a translational profiling approach for the comparative analysis of CNS cell types. Cell. 2008;135:749–762. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gukovskaya A.S., Gukovsky I., Jung Y., Mouria M., Pandol S.J. Cholecystokinin induces caspase activation and mitochondrial dysfunction in pancreatic acinar cells. Roles in cell injury processes of pancreatitis. J. Boil. Chem. 2002;277:22595–22604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202929200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Niederau C., Luthen R., Heintges T. Effects of CCK on pancreatic function and morphology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1994;713:180–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb44065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Dockray G.J., Gregory R.A., Hutchison J.B., Harris J.I., Runswick M.J. Isolation, structure and biological activity of two cholecystokinin octapeptides from sheep brain. Nature. 1978;274:711–713. doi: 10.1038/274711a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Emson P.C., Lee C.M., Rehfeld J.F. Cholecystokinin octapeptide: Vesicular localization and calcium dependent release from rat brain in vitro. Life Sci. 1980;26:2157–2163. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(80)90603-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lee S.Y., Soltesz I. Cholecystokinin: A multi-functional molecular switch of neuronal circuits. Dev. Neurobiol. 2011;71:83–91. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Katona I., Sperlagh B., Sik A., Kafalvi A., Vizi E.S., Mackie K., Freund T.F. Presynaptically located CB1 cannabinoid receptors regulate GABA release from axon terminals of specific hippocampal interneurons. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 1999;19:4544–4558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04544.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Nyiri G., Cserep C., Szabadits E., Mackie K., Freund T.F. CB1 cannabinoid receptors are enriched in the perisynaptic annulus and on preterminal segments of hippocampal GABAergic axons. Neuroscience. 2005;136:811–822. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Migaud M., Roques B.P., Durieux C. Effects of cholecystokinin octapeptide and BC 264, a potent and selective CCK-B agonist on aspartate and glutamate release from rat hippocampal slices. Neuropharmacology. 1994;33:737–743. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(94)90113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Breukel A.I., Lopes da Silva F.H., Ghijsen W.E. Cholecystokinin (CCK-8) modulates vesicular release of excitatory amino acids in rat hippocampal nerve endings. Neurosci. Lett. 1997;234:67–70. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00678-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chung C., Elrick M.J., Dell’Orco J.M., Qin Z.S., Kalyana-Sundaram S., Chinnaiyan A.M., Shakkottai V.G., Lieberman A.P. Heat Shock Protein Beta-1 Modifies Anterior to Posterior Purkinje Cell Vulnerability in a Mouse Model of Niemann-Pick Type C Disease. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lein E.S., Hawrylycz M.J., Ao N., Ayres M., Bensinger A., Bernard A., Boe A.F., Boguski M.S., Brockway K.S., Byrnes E.J., et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007;445:168–176. doi: 10.1038/nature05453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nagao S., Kwak S., Kanazawa I. EAAT4, a glutamate transporter with properties of a chloride channel, is predominantly localized in Purkinje cell dendrites, and forms parasagittal compartments in rat cerebellum. Neuroscience. 1997;78:929–933. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ohashi R., Sakata S., Naito A., Hirashima N., Tanaka M. Dendritic differentiation of cerebellar Purkinje cells is promoted by ryanodine receptors expressed by Purkinje and granule cells. Dev. Neurobiol. 2014;74:467–480. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhao Y., Kwan K.M., Mailloux C.M., Lee W.K., Grinberg A., Wurst W., Behringer R.R., Westphal H. LIM-homeodomain proteins Lhx1 and Lhx5, and their cofactor Ldb1, control Purkinje cell differentiation in the developing cerebellum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:13182–13186. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705464104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cologna S.M., Cluzeau C.V., Yanjanin N.M., Blank P.S., Dail M.K., Siebel S., Toth C.L., Wassif C.A., Lieberman A.P., Porter F.D. Human and mouse neuroinflammation markers in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2014;37:83–92. doi: 10.1007/s10545-013-9610-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lopez M.E., Klein A.D., Hong J., Dimbil U.J., Scott M.P. Neuronal and epithelial cell rescue resolves chronic systemic inflammation in the lipid storage disorder Niemann-Pick C. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012;21:2946–2960. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Suzuki M., Sugimoto Y., Ohsaki Y., Ueno M., Kato S., Kitamura Y., Hosokawa H., Davies J.P., Ioannou Y.A., Vanier M.T., et al. Endosomal accumulation of Toll-like receptor 4 causes constitutive secretion of cytokines and activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription in Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) fibroblasts: A potential basis for glial cell activation in the NPC brain. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2007;27:1879–1891. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5282-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Loftus S.K., Morris J.A., Carstea E.D., Gu J.Z., Cummings C., Brown A., Ellison J., Ohno K., Rosenfeld M.A., Tagle D.A., et al. Murine model of Niemann-Pick C disease: Mutation in a cholesterol homeostasis gene. Science. 1997;277:232–235. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5323.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zhu A., Ibrahim J.G., Love M.I. Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: Removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:2084–2092. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Leek J.T. svaseq: Removing batch effects and other unwanted noise from sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Merico D., Isserlin R., Stueker O., Emili A., Bader G.D. Enrichment map: A network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kucera M., Isserlin R., Arkhangorodsky A., Bader G.D. AutoAnnotate: A Cytoscape app for summarizing networks with semantic annotations. F1000Research. 2016;5:1717. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9090.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Williams I.M., Carletti B., Leto K., Magrassi L., Rossi F. Cerebellar granule cells transplanted in vivo can follow physiological and unusual migratory routes to integrate into the recipient cortex. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008;30:139–149. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES