Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;25(1):200. doi: 10.3390/molecules25010200

Table 3.

Interaction analysis of mutual mint infusions and mint infusions/rosmarinic acid combinations in DPPH and ABTS assays: IC50, CI, and DRI values of equal mass concentration infusions combinations at 50% inhibition dose level.

Infusions Combination a IC50 (μg/mL) b r CI c SDA d Combined Effect DRI e
DPPH MPP:ML 25.95
(28.45:25.39)
0.98
(0.99:0.98)
0.97 ±0.02 nearly additive 2.19:1.96
MPP:MVS 33.38
(28.45:39.48)
0.99
(0.99:0.99)
1.01 ±0.01 nearly additive 1.70:2.37
ML:MVS 33.82
(25.39:39.48)
0.97
(0.98:0.99)
1.09 ±0.02 nearly additive 1.50:2.33
MPP:ML:MVS 31.68
(28.45:25.39:39.48)
0.99
(0.99:0.98:0.99)
1.05 ±0.01 nearly additive 2.69:2.41:3.74
MPP:RA 7.49
(28.45:2.28)
0.98
(0.99:0.99)
1.78 ±0.03 antagonism 7.60:0.61
ML:RA 11.01
(25.39:2.28)
0.98
(0.98:0.99)
2.63 ±0.05 antagonism 4.61:0.41
MVS:RA 5.33
(39.48:2.28)
0.98
(0.99:0.99)
1.24 ±0.02 moderate antagonism 14.80:0.85
ABTS MPP:ML 21.83
(27.45:21.30)
0.98
(0.97:0.98)
0.91 ±0.03 nearly additive 2.52:1.95
MPP:MVS 44.07
(27.45:40.81)
0.98
(0.97:0.99)
1.34 ±0.04 moderate antagonism 1.25:1.85
ML:MVS 29.21
(21.30:40.81)
0.98
(0.97:0.99)
1.04 ±0.03 nearly additive 1.46:2.79
MPP:ML:MVS 24.84
(27.45:21.30:40.81)
0.96
(0.97:0.98:0.99)
0.89 ±0.03 slight synergism 3.32:2.57:4.93
MPP:RA 3.64
(27.45:1.05)
0.98
(0.97:0.99)
1.80 ±0.03 antagonism 15.09:0.58
ML:RA 4.48
(21.30: 1.05)
0.99
(0.98:0.99)
2.24 ±0.03 antagonism 9.51:0.47
MVS:RA 3.78
(40.81:1.05)
0.98
(0.99:0.99)
1.85 ±0.03 antagonism 21.60:0.56

a MPP—Mentha × piperita cv. ‘Perpeta’; ML—Mentha longifolia; MVS—Mentha × villosa cv. ‘Snežná’; RA—rosmarinic acid. b Median inhibitory activities IC50 (μg/mL) of the equal mass concentration infusions combinations and in bracket their single infusion/compound IC50 level. c CI—combination index, a quantitative measure based on the mass-action law of the degree of drug interaction in terms of synergism (CI < 1) and antagonism (CI > 1) for a given endpoint of the effect measurement. The combined effect is evaluated according to Chou (2006). d SDA-sequential deletion analysis, iterative sequential deletion of one dose (or concentration) of a drug at a time for repetitive CI calculations. e DRI represents the order of magnitude (fold) of dose reduction that is allowed in combination for a given degree of effect as compared with the dose of each drug alone.