Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 20;16(4):1183–1197. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00774-9

Table 3.

Metric comparison between manual (plan 1) and final CAP (plan 4)

Metric Estimate (plan 1–plan 4 difference) 95% confidence interval p value
Length (mm) 0.54 (− 2.94, 4.02) 0.762
Drilling angle (deg.) 1.11 (− 1.88, 4.10) 0.467
GM sampling ratio −0.02 (− 0.05, 0.00) 0.098
Risk score 0.05 (0.02, 0.08) 0.003
Minimum distance from critical structure (mm) −0.22 (− 0.43, − 0.01) 0.040

Estimates for differences between plan 1 and plan 4, for each metric, together with associated 95% confidence intervals and p values for a test of the null hypothesis that the true difference = 0. The estimates have been obtained from mixed-effects regression models that include within-patients random effects to account for within-patient clustering of electrodes