Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2020 Jan 27;64(2):e01577-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01577-19

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of GSK656 against Mycobacterium Species

Wenzhu Dong a,b,c,#, Shanshan Li a,#, Shu’an Wen a,#, Wei Jing a, Jin Shi a,d, Yifeng Ma a, Fengmin Huo a, Fei Gao c,, Yu Pang a,, Jie Lu d,
PMCID: PMC6985724  PMID: 31791947

In this study, we aimed to assess the in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among multiple mycobacterial species and to investigate the correlation between leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) sequence variations and in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among mycobacterial species. A total of 187 mycobacterial isolates, comprising 105 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates and 82 nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates, were randomly selected for the determination of in vitro susceptibility.

KEYWORDS: GSK656, LeuRS, susceptibility, mycobacteria

ABSTRACT

In this study, we aimed to assess the in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among multiple mycobacterial species and to investigate the correlation between leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) sequence variations and in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among mycobacterial species. A total of 187 mycobacterial isolates, comprising 105 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates and 82 nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates, were randomly selected for the determination of in vitro susceptibility. For M. tuberculosis, 102 of 105 isolates had MICs of ≤0.5 mg/liter, demonstrating a MIC50 of 0.063 mg/liter and a MIC90 of 0.25 mg/liter. An epidemiological cutoff value of 0.5 mg/liter was proposed for identification of GSK656-resistant M. tuberculosis strains. For NTM, the MIC50 and MIC90 values were >8.0 mg/liter for both Mycobacterium intracellulare and Mycobacterium avium. In contrast, all Mycobacterium abscessus isolates had MICs of ≤0.25 mg/liter, yielding a MIC90 of 0.063 mg/liter. LeuRS from M. abscessus showed greater sequence similarity to M. tuberculosis LeuRS than to LeuRSs from M. avium and M. intracellulare. Sequence alignment revealed 28 residues differing between LeuRSs from M. avium and M. intracellulare and LeuRSs from M. tuberculosis and M. abscessus; among them, 15 residues were in the drug binding domain. Structure modeling revealed that several different residues were close to the tRNA-LeuRS interface or the entrance of the drug-tRNA binding pocket. In conclusion, our data demonstrate significant species diversity in in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among various mycobacterial species. GSK656 has potent efficacy against M. tuberculosis and M. abscessus, whereas inherent resistance was noted for M. intracellulare and M. avium.

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB), which is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, remains a major cause of morbidity and death worldwide, with an estimated 10.0 million new incident cases and 1.6 million deaths in 2017 (1). The emergence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), i.e., bacteria resistant to isoniazid and rifampin, hampers progress toward elimination of tuberculosis at a global level (2, 3). Nearly 0.6 million new cases of MDR-TB occur annually (1). Due to its intrinsic resistance to the most potent drugs, the treatment of MDR-TB requires up to 2 years of therapy with second-line medications (which are less effective and more toxic), and only 50% of MDR-TB cases receiving second-line drugs achieve favorable outcomes, as reported by the World Health Organization (1, 4). The situation is much worse for patients infected with extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), which is defined as MDR-TB with additional resistance to any fluoroquinolone and at least one of the three injectable second-line drugs (2). The extensively resistant form beyond MDR-TB dramatically reflects treatment option exhaustion, resulting in even worse clinical outcomes (5). Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel drugs that assist in the management of drug-resistant TB, especially MDR-TB and XDR-TB (3).

Infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) have become increasingly common in past years (6, 7). Unfortunately, low public health priority has been placed on this neglected aspect, due to a lack of solid evidence for person-to-person transmission, especially in countries with poor settings in which TB is endemic (8). Treatment of NTM disease remains difficult, in part because of resistance to the first-line antituberculous agents (9). As an alternative, multiple new anti-TB drugs have been used in salvage therapy to achieve optimal outcomes for patients with NTM disease (10). In view of their heterogeneity, significant differences in in vitro drug susceptibility are noted among NTM species (11, 12). Hence, the evaluation of susceptibility to the promising novel agents among NTM species is essential to determine correct therapeutic applications of these agents for the treatment of NTM disease.

GSK656 is a novel member of the 3-aminomethyl 4-halogen benzoxaboroles that targets M. tuberculosis leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) (13). Oxaborole drugs can trap the 3′ end of tRNA in the editing site of LeuRS by forming a nonproductive covalent adduct between the drug and tRNA, thereby inhibiting leucylation and protein synthesis (14). Due to this new mechanism of action, GSK656 could be used as a promising drug candidate against drug-resistant TB, especially MDR-TB and XDR-TB. Primary data demonstrated that GSK656 had remarkable efficacy in eliminating pathogenic tubercle bacilli both in vitro and in vivo (13). The question of whether this novel agent is efficacious for the management of NTM disease also arises. To address these concerns, we carried out this study to assess the in vitro susceptibility of multiple mycobacterial species to GSK656. The second objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between sequence variations within LeuRS and in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among mycobacterial species.

RESULTS

In vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among M. tuberculosis isolates.

A total of 105 clinical M. tuberculosis isolates, comprising 40 non-MDR-TB, 40 MDR-TB, and 25 XDR-TB isolates, were randomly selected for the determination of in vitro susceptibility. The majority of the isolates tested (95.2%) had GSK656 MICs of ≤0.25 mg/liter (Table 1). For non-MDR-TB, all isolates had MICs of ≤0.25 mg/liter, demonstrating a MIC50 of 0.063 mg/liter and a MIC90 of 0.125 mg/liter. MDR-TB and XDR-TB isolates showed slightly higher MICs; 95.0% and 88.0% of MDR-TB and XDR-TB isolates, respectively, had MICs of ≤0.25 mg/liter. The MIC90s of the MDR-TB and XDR-TB isolates were 0.25 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively. According to the distribution of GSK656 MICs for M. tuberculosis isolates, we proposed an epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF) value of 0.5 mg/liter for identification of GSK656-resistant tubercle bacilli. As shown in Table 1, 1 MDR-TB isolate and 2 XDR-TB isolates were resistant to GSK656.

TABLE 1.

Distribution of GSK656 MICs among M. tuberculosis isolates

Classification No. of strains with MIC (mg/liter) of:
Total no. MIC50 (mg/liter)a MIC90 (mg/liter)
<0.008 0.008 0.016 0.031 0.063 0.125 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 >8.0
Non-MDR 1 3 9 6 16 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0.063 0.125
MDR 0 2 4 6 14 8 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 40 0.063 0.25
XDR 0 0 3 4 9 5 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 25 0.063 0.5
Total 1 5 16 16 39 17 6 2 0 2 0 1 0 105 0.063 0.25
a

MIC50, concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of the isolates tested; MIC90, concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the isolates tested.

The candidate gene conferring GSK656 resistance was analyzed for the 3 GSK656-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates. All 3 isolates were found to contain the Ser403Pro allele in the LeuRS gene, whereas this mutant type was identified in 18 of 20 GSK656-susceptible M. tuberculosis isolates, indicating that this mutation was not associated with GSK656 resistance; however, there may be other potential resistance mechanisms within this region.

In vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among NTM isolates.

We also tested the in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among 82 NTM isolates, including 30 Mycobacterium intracellulare isolates (36.6%), 16 Mycobacterium avium isolates (19.5%), and 36 Mycobacterium abscessus isolates (43.9%). The results are summarized in Table 2. For the M. avium complex, GSK656 exhibited poor activity against both M. intracellulare and M. avium. Although 1 M. intracellulare isolate (3.3%) showed a MIC of 1.0 mg/liter, the MICs of the remaining 29 isolates (96.7%) were ≥8.0 mg/liter. In addition, all of the test M. avium isolates had MICs of >8.0 mg/liter. The MIC50 and MIC90 values were >8.0 mg/liter for both M. intracellulare and M. avium isolates. In contrast, GSK656 showed excellent activity against M. abscessus isolates; all isolates had MICs of ≤0.25 mg/liter, yielding a MIC50 of 0.031 mg/liter and a MIC90 of 0.063 mg/liter, which were 2-fold lower than those for M. tuberculosis isolates.

TABLE 2.

Distribution of GSK656 MICs among NTM isolates

Species No. of strains with MIC (mg/liter) of:
Total no. MIC50 (mg/liter)a MIC90 (mg/liter)
<0.008 0.008 0.016 0.031 0.063 0.125 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 8.0 >8.0
M. intracellulare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 28 30 >8.0 >8.0
M. avium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 >8.0 >8.0
M. abscessus 0 0 1 18 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0.031 0.063
a

MIC50, concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of the isolates tested; MIC90, concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the isolates tested.

Sequence analysis of LeuRSs from M. tuberculosis and NTM.

According to the result of phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1), LeuRS from M. abscessus showed greater sequence similarity to M. tuberculosis LeuRS than LeuRSs from M. avium and M. intracellulare. Based on this result and the results of in vitro susceptibility testing, we divided the proteins into group A (LeuRSs from M. tuberculosis and M. abscessus, with a drug-susceptible phenotype) and group B (LeuRSs from M. avium and M. intracellulare, with a drug-resistant phenotype). Sequence comparison revealed 28 residues differing between group A and group B (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Among them, 15 residues were in the editing domain (residues V300 to K516 in M. tuberculosis LeuRS). However, none of the 15 residues were located in the active site of the editing domain, which contains three regions, namely, a threonine-rich region (residues T336 to T341 in M. tuberculosis LeuRS), a GTG region (residues G436 to V443 in M. tuberculosis LeuRS), and a catalytic region (residues H446 to D452 in M. tuberculosis LeuRS).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Phylogenetic tree of LeuRS proteins from M. tuberculosis, M. abscessus, M. avium, and M. intracellulare.

To further analyze the possible roles of 28 different residues in interactions between LeuRS and a drug-tRNA adduct, we performed structure modeling. In SWISS-MODEL analysis, the search for templates revealed that the LeuRS from Thermus thermophilus had the highest sequence identity (39.8%) to M. tuberculosis LeuRS. In order to analyze the binding status of both tRNA and GSK656, we chose PDB file 2V0G as the modeling template, because this structure file contained not only LeuRS from T. thermophilus but also the tRNA and a benzoxaborole (AN2690).

In Fig. 2, 28 residues that differed between group A and group B are displayed on M. tuberculosis LeuRS as cyan sticks. Among 15 residues in the editing domain, 3 residues (T476, P493, and R497 in M. tuberculosis LeuRS) were around the entrance of the binding pocket for the drug-tRNA adduct. Among the 11 residues outside the editing domain, 1 residue (Q299 in M. tuberculosis LeuRS) was close to the tRNA-LeuRS interface.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Structure of the M. tuberculosis LeuRS complex with a benzoxaborole (AN2690) and tRNA. The LeuRS protein (yellow) and tRNA (gray) are displayed in cartoon mode. The 28 different residues (cyan) and the benzoxaborole drug (red) are shown as sticks and CPK balls.

DISCUSSION

The epidemic of MDR-TB remains an increasing public health concern worldwide (1). The development and clinical application of novel efficacious agents are urgently needed to shorten treatment and to increase cure rates for MDR-TB cases (15). In this study, we first assessed the in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among multiple mycobacterial species. Our data demonstrate significant species diversity in in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among various mycobacterial species, and M. tuberculosis isolates are susceptible to GSK656 regardless of initial drug resistance patterns. The majority of non-MDR-TB isolates tested exhibited MICs lower than 0.063 mg/liter. This observation is similar to a previous study demonstrating a MIC of 0.024 mg/liter for the H37Rv strain. In addition, we suggest a tentative ECOFF value of 0.5 mg/liter for GSK656. The pharmacokinetic data represent another important issue to be taken into consideration when determining clinical breakpoints for antimicrobial agents. A recent study by Li and colleagues revealed that GSK656 exhibited low clearance and excellent exposure, with an the area under the concentration-time curve for GSK656 of 11.12 h · μg/ml, in a murine model (13). The comparison between the ECOFF value and pharmacokinetic data indicates that the proposed ECOFF value can used to detect low-level resistance among M. tuberculosis isolates, which might still be treated with increased dosage. Therefore, further clinical trials are essential to determine the correlation between plasma concentrations of GSK656 and clinical outcomes among TB patients.

Three M. tuberculosis isolates tested, including 1 MDR-TB isolate and 2 XDR-TB isolates, had MICs higher than the proposed ECOFF. Considering that all isolates were isolated from patients without prior exposure to GSK656, it is highly unlikely that they could have accumulated various types of genetic mutations within the target gene for GSK656, which is supported by our sequence analysis of LeuRS. Therefore, we speculate that cell surface permeability barriers and active efflux in tubercle bacilli may play important roles in the emergence of low-level resistance to GSK656 (2). In a previous experimental study, Velayati et al. found that the cell wall of drug-resistant isolates, especially MDR-TB and XDR-TB isolates, was significantly thicker than that of susceptible isolates (16). The increased thickness of the cell wall would prevent the entry of antimicrobial agents into bacterial cells. In addition, higher MIC values were observed only for 1 MDR-TB isolate and 2 XDR-TB isolates. Considering that increased thickness of the cell wall is more likely to confer low-level resistance to GSK656, potential novel mechanisms of action for GSK656 may be responsible for isolates with high-level resistance.

Another interesting finding is that GSK656 exhibits potent efficacy against M. abscessus isolates. Due to natural resistance to most of the antibiotics that are currently available, M. abscessus infections are difficult to treat (17). Our findings suggest that GSK656 has potent antimicrobial activity against M. abscessus in in vitro susceptibility testing. Further studies are needed to evaluate the in vivo activity and pharmacokinetic parameters of GSK656 against M. abscessus strains. Notably, although M. abscessus is a member of the rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM), its LeuRS has greater sequence similarity to the LeuRS of slowly growing M. tuberculosis than to those of M. intracellulare and M. avium, which partly explains the diversity of GSK656 effects against various groups of mycobacteria.

As previously confirmed, the editing domain of LeuRS is the binding domain of oxaboroles such as GSK656, and the editing active site is the oxaborole binding site (14, 18). Although the 15 residues that differed between protein group A and group B in the editing domain were not located in the active site, the changes of these residues might remodel the binding pocket for the drug-tRNA adduct and LeuRS protein. In addition, several residues were close to the tRNA-LeuRS interface or the entrance of the drug binding pocket, which might influence substrate binding. Therefore, these differences are proposed as possible mechanisms for differential efficacy among mycobacterial species.

There were several obvious limitations to this study. First, in view of the absence of outcome data, the ECOFF value is a salvage solution for distinguishing resistant and susceptible isolates. Our experimental findings require confirmation with larger clinical studies. Second, another major limitation is the small number of enrolled NTM isolates, which may weaken the overall significance of our study conclusion. Third, as endorsed by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, M. abscessus inocula are incubated at 30°C instead of 37°C used in this study. Despite the fact that the incubation temperature would not affect the growth of this mycobacterial species (19), the deviation in culture conditions may lead to potential bias in the interpretation of our results. Fourth, only GSK656, rather than other antimicrobial agents, was tested in in vitro susceptibility testing. We could not provide a direct comparison of efficacy between GSK656 and standard anti-TB agents. Finally, the model for LeuRS-GSK656 binding is computerized rather than accurately depicted. Despite these limitations, this study provides a comprehensive description of in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among mycobacterial species.

In conclusion, our data demonstrate significant species diversity in in vitro susceptibility to GSK656 among various mycobacterial species. GSK656 has potent efficacy against M. tuberculosis and M. abscessus, whereas inherent resistance is noted for M. intracellulare and M. avium. The LeuRS from M. abscessus shows greater sequence similarity to M. tuberculosis LeuRS than to the LeuRSs from M. avium and M. intracellulare. Further clinical trials are needed to validate our experimental findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

The mycobacterial isolates used in this study were collected from Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, between 2011 and 2016. Each isolate was isolated from a unique patient and identified at the species level using multilocus sequence analysis, as described previously (20).

MIC testing.

The in vitro susceptibility of M. tuberculosis isolates to GSK656 was determined by a microdilution MIC testing method with 7H9 broth, as reported previously (21). For NTM, isolates were tested with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB), according to the guidelines from the CLSI (22). CAMHB enriched with 5% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) was used for slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM), while CAMHB without OADC was used for RGM. Briefly, a suspension of 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared with freshly grown bacteria. Then, 100 μl of diluted inoculum was pipetted into each well of the plate, which contained 100 μl of corresponding drug at concentrations prepared from 2-fold serial dilutions in CAMHB broth. The final concentration of organisms in each well reached 105 CFU/ml. The tested concentrations of GSK656 ranged from 0.008 to 8.0 mg/liter. Normally, after 7 days of incubation for M. tuberculosis and SGM isolates or 3 days of incubation for RGM isolates at 37°C, 70 μl of alamarBlue solution was added to each well. For isolates with insufficient growth in the drug-free control by the end of the first time point, 3 additional days of incubation were used to accumulate adequate growth prior to addition of the alamarBlue solution. The plates were then reincubated at 37°C. A blue color in the well indicated no mycobacterial growth, while a pink color indicated growth occurrence. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent that prevented the color change from blue to pink. Each experimental batch was tested using the reference M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv (ATCC 27294) for quality control purposes. All experiments were performed in triplicate. For isolates giving discordant MIC results, the experiments were repeated until three identical MIC values were obtained, which were determined as the MIC values of the corresponding isolates. The ECOFF values were determined on the basis of the MIC distribution profiles. For unimodal MIC distributions, ECOFF values were defined as concentrations inhibiting ≥99.9% of the bacterial population; for bimodal MIC distributions, ECOFF values were set between the two populations (12).

DNA sequencing.

The crude genomic DNA of M. tuberculosis isolates was isolated with a rapid boiling method, as reported previously (23). The freshly grown bacteria were transferred into a microcentrifuge tube containing 500 μl Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 2 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the sediment was resuspended in 500 μl TE buffer. The resuspension was heated in a 95°C water bath for 1 h, followed by centrifuging at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was used as the template for PCR amplification. According to previous reports (13), LeuRS (Rv0041) is the GSK656 antibiotic target in tubercle bacilli. The entire LeuRS gene of M. tuberculosis isolates with high MIC values (MICs of >0.5 mg/liter) was amplified and sequenced.

Sequence alignment and structure modeling.

Protein sequences of LeuRSs from M. tuberculosis (UniProt accession no. P9WFV1), M. abscessus (UniProt accession no. B1MMK6), M. avium (UniProt accession no. A0Q8W7), and M. intracellulare (UniProt accession no. H8IHP3) were obtained from UniProtKB (http://www.uniprot.org). Sequence alignment was performed using Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo), and the results were sent to Simple Phylogeny (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/phylogeny/simple_phylogeny) to generate a phylogenetic tree, using the neighbor-joining clustering method. The structure modeling of M. tuberculosis LeuRS (UniProt accession no. P9WFV1) was performed with SWISS-MODEL, using PDB file 2V0G as the modeling template (24). The sequence alignment was further formatted in ESPript, according to the results of Clustal Omega and structure modeling.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
AAC.01577-19-s0001.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Tongzhou District Science and Technology Committee (grant KJ2019CX016), the Beijing Talents Foundation (grant 2017000021223ZK39), and the Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Youth Program (grant QML20171601).

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.World Health Organization (WHO). 2018. Global tuberculosis report 2018, WHO/CDS/TB/2018.20. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang Z, Pang Y, Wang Y, Liu C, Zhao Y. 2014. Beijing genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is significantly associated with linezolid resistance in multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents 43:231–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dheda K, Gumbo T, Maartens G, Dooley KE, McNerney R, Murray M, Furin J, Nardell EA, London L, Lessem E, Theron G, van Helden P, Niemann S, Merker M, Dowdy D, Van Rie A, Siu GK, Pasipanodya JG, Rodrigues C, Clark TG, Sirgel FA, Esmail A, Lin HH, Atre SR, Schaaf HS, Chang KC, Lange C, Nahid P, Udwadia ZF, Horsburgh CR Jr, Churchyard GJ, Menzies D, Hesseling AC, Nuermberger E, McIlleron H, Fennelly KP, Goemaere E, Jaramillo E, Low M, Jara CM, Padayatchi N, Warren RM. 2017. The epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis. Lancet Respir Med 5:291–360. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30079-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xu C, Pang Y, Li R, Ruan Y, Wang L, Chen M, Zhang H. 2018. Clinical outcome of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients receiving standardized second-line treatment regimen in China. J Infect 76:348–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marais BJ. 2016. The global tuberculosis situation and the inexorable rise of drug-resistant disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 102:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoefsloot W, van Ingen J, Andrejak C, Angeby K, Bauriaud R, Bemer P, Beylis N, Boeree MJ, Cacho J, Chihota V, Chimara E, Churchyard G, Cias R, Daza R, Daley CL, Dekhuijzen PNR, Domingo D, Drobniewski F, Esteban J, Fauville-Dufaux M, Folkvardsen DB, Gibbons N, Gómez-Mampaso E, Gonzalez R, Hoffmann H, Hsueh P-R, Indra A, Jagielski T, Jamieson F, Jankovic M, Jong E, Keane J, Koh W-J, Lange B, Leao S, Macedo R, Mannsåker T, Marras TK, Maugein J, Milburn HJ, Mlinkó T, Morcillo N, Morimoto K, Papaventsis D, Palenque E, Paez-Peña M, Piersimoni C, Polanová M, Rastogi N, Richter E, Ruiz-Serrano MJ, Silva A, da Silva MP, Simsek H, van Soolingen D, Szabó N, Thomson R, Tórtola Fernandez T, Tortoli E, Totten SE, Tyrrell G, Vasankari T, Villar M, Walkiewicz R, Winthrop KL, Wagner D. 2013. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J 42:1604–1613. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00149212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pang Y, Tan Y, Chen J, Li Y, Zheng H, Song Y, Zhao Y. 2017. Diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria in eastern and southern China: a cross-sectional study. Eur Respir J 49:1601429. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01429-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Piersimoni C, Scarparo C. 2008. Pulmonary infections associated with non-tuberculous mycobacteria in immunocompetent patients. Lancet Infect Dis 8:323–334. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70100-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ Jr, Winthrop K. 2007. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Philley JV, Wallace RJ Jr, Benwill JL, Taskar V, Brown-Elliott BA, Thakkar F, Aksamit TR, Griffith DE. 2015. Preliminary results of bedaquiline as salvage therapy for patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Chest 148:499–506. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shi J, Lu J, Wen S, Zong Z, Huo F, Luo J, Liang Q, Li Y, Huang H, Pang Y. 2018. In vitro activity of PBTZ169 against multiple Mycobacterium species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01314-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01314-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pang Y, Zheng H, Tan Y, Song Y, Zhao Y. 2017. In vitro activity of bedaquiline against nontuberculous mycobacteria in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02627-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02627-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li X, Hernandez V, Rock FL, Choi W, Mak YSL, Mohan M, Mao W, Zhou Y, Easom EE, Plattner JJ, Zou W, Perez-Herran E, Giordano I, Mendoza-Losana A, Alemparte C, Rullas J, Angulo-Barturen I, Crouch S, Ortega F, Barros D, Alley M. 2017. Discovery of a potent and specific M. tuberculosis leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitor: (S)-3-(aminomethyl)-4-chloro-7–(2-hydroxyethoxy)benzo[c][1,2]oxaborol-1(3H)-ol (GSK656). J Med Chem 60:8011–8026. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rock FL, Mao W, Yaremchuk A, Tukalo M, Crepin T, Zhou H, Zhang YK, Hernandez V, Akama T, Baker SJ, Plattner JJ, Shapiro L, Martinis SA, Benkovic SJ, Cusack S, Alley MR. 2007. An antifungal agent inhibits an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by trapping tRNA in the editing site. Science 316:1759–1761. doi: 10.1126/science.1142189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tiberi S, Du Plessis N, Walzl G, Vjecha MJ, Rao M, Ntoumi F, Mfinanga S, Kapata N, Mwaba P, McHugh TD, Ippolito G, Migliori GB, Maeurer MJ, Zumla A. 2018. Tuberculosis: progress and advances in development of new drugs, treatment regimens, and host-directed therapies. Lancet Infect Dis 18:e183–e198. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30110-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Velayati AA, Farnia P, Ibrahim TA, Haroun RZ, Kuan HO, Ghanavi J, Farnia P, Kabarei AN, Tabarsi P, Omar AR, Varahram M, Masjedi MR. 2009. Differences in cell wall thickness between resistant and nonresistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: using transmission electron microscopy. Chemotherapy 55:303–307. doi: 10.1159/000226425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nessar R, Cambau E, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. 2012. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:810–818. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Palencia A, Li X, Bu W, Choi W, Ding CZ, Easom EE, Feng L, Hernandez V, Houston P, Liu L, Meewan M, Mohan M, Rock FL, Sexton H, Zhang S, Zhou Y, Wan B, Wang Y, Franzblau SG, Woolhiser L, Gruppo V, Lenaerts AJ, O'Malley T, Parish T, Cooper CB, Waters MG, Ma Z, Ioerger TR, Sacchettini JC, Rullas J, Angulo-Barturen I, Pérez-Herrán E, Mendoza A, Barros D, Cusack S, Plattner JJ, Alley MRK. 2016. Discovery of novel oral protein synthesis inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that target leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6271–6280. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01339-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang Z, Lu J, Liu M, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Pang Y. 2017. In vitro activity of clarithromycin in combination with other antimicrobial agents against Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium massiliense. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:383–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang Z, Pang Y, Wang Y, Cohen C, Zhao Y, Liu C. 2015. Differences in risk factors and drug susceptibility between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare lung diseases in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:491–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Klingeren B, Dessens-Kroon M, van der Laan T, Kremer K, van Soolingen D. 2007. Drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by use of a high-throughput, reproducible, absolute concentration method. J Clin Microbiol 45:2662–2668. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00244-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2011. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardia, and other aerobic actinomycetes; approved standard, 2nd ed; CLSI document M24-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pang Y, Zhou Y, Wang S, Lu J, Lu B, He G, Wang L, Zhao Y. 2011. A novel method based on high resolution melting (HRM) analysis for MIRU-VNTR genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Microbiol Methods 86:291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, Heer FT, de Beer TAP, Rempfer C, Bordoli L, Lepore R, Schwede T. 2018. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W296–W303. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
AAC.01577-19-s0001.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES