Abstract
Atractylodes lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala are the three most widely used medicinal species of the Atractylodes genus. Their similar morphological features cause disagreement as whether they are three unique species, leading to their frequent misuses in medical products. Our study aimed to understand their relationships through both the complete plastome sequences and nuclear sequences, to identify molecular markers for their differentiation and explore the evolutionary relationships among three species. We sequenced, annotated, and analyzed the plastomes of these three species. The plastomes are 153,201, 153,258, and 153,265 bps in length for A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephaly, respectively. Similar to other Asteraceae species, their plastomes exhibit typical quadripartite structures. Each plastome consists of 119 distinct genes, including 78 protein-coding, 37 tRNA, and 4 rRNA genes. Analyses of indels, single-nucleotide polymorphisms and simple sequence repeats, and comparison of plastomes showed high degree of conservation, leading to difficulty in the discovery of differentiating markers. We identified eleven potential molecular markers using an algorithm based on interspecific and intraspecific nucleotide diversity gaps. Validation experiments with fifty-five individuals from the three species collected from the botanical garden and fields confirmed that the marker cz11 could effectively distinguish samples from the three different species. Analysis of the several nuclear sequences suggests that the species of A. macrocephala may be a hybrid of A. lancea and A. chinensis. In summary, the results from this study highlight the complex relationships among of these three medicinal plants.
Introduction
The genus Atractylodes (family Asteraceae) consists of seven species which are distributed across China, Korea, and Japan. Several Atractylodes species have long been known for their medicinal values. According to clinical purposes, their dried rhizomes are used as two kinds of herbal medicines, namely, Baizhu in Chinese or byakujutsu in Japanese and Cangzhu in Chinese or sojutsu in Japanese [1, 2]. Among these speices, only A. carlinoides (Hand.-Mazz.) Kitam. has a stoloniferous and slender rhizome. Many other Atractylodes species have thick rhizomes. In particular, the thick rhizomes of A. lancea (Thunb.) DC. and A. chinensis (Bunge) Koidz. have been classified as Cangzhu and that of A. macrocephala Koidz. has been classified as Baizhu in the pharmacopeias of China, Korea, and Japan [3]. In traditional Chinese medicine, the pharmacological effects of Baizhu and Cangzhu are distinct. Baizhu causes diaphoretic activities, and Cangzhu causes antisudorific activities. Recent studies have shown that rhizomes of Atractylodes exhibit many other pharmacological effects, such as antibacterial, immunomodulatory, antitumor, and antiosteoporosis, thereby indicating the considerable potential of Atractylodes in the development of new drugs [4, 5].
Despite the wide usage of species of Atractylodes as source of medicinal products, controversies exist over the taxonomic relationships among its species [1, 3]. Furthermore, different species of Atractylodes possess different chemical constituents with diverse bioactivities. Accurate species identification is essential to ensure the clinical safety of medicinal products derived from Atractylodes plants. However, given the morphological similarity, distinguishing the species by macroscopic observation is difficult. Consequently, the misuse of rhizomes of Atractylodes is common when species identification is based only on morphological features. Therefore, an accurate method of species determination is required to ensure the safety and effective uses of Atractylodes species for medicinal purposes.
Many molecular identification methods have been developed in the past years [6]. Recently, the universal DNA barcodes, such as internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and trnK gene [7], have been used for species identification and phylogenetic analysis of Atractylodes species [1, 8]. Nevertheless, these markers have not performed satisfactorily at the species and intraspecific levels due to unclear species boundaries and low resolution [1, 3]. Hence, additional markers should be developed. A complete chloroplast genome is a rich source of additional molecular markers. The chloroplast genomes are more conserved than the nuclear genomes in plants. Nonetheless, many mutational events, including insertions/deletions (indels), substitutions, and inversions in the chloroplast DNA sequence, have been identified [9, 10]. These mutations can be used as markers to rapidly distinguish species [11]. Furthermore, these mutations can resolve complex evolutionary relationships and improve the resolution at low taxonomic levels among closely related species [12–15].
With the rapid advancement in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, DNA sequencing becomes affordable in regular laboratories. Along with genome-skimming strategies, obtaining complete chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) sequences at low cost without prior purification of cpDNA is easy [16]. The present study aims to determine the phylogenetic relationship of several Atractylodes species and identify molecular markers for their differentiation.
Chloroplasts are a kind of plastid and are present in multiple copies in a cell. In the following text, we will refer chloroplast genome as plastome. In our initial analysis, we found that the plastome regions that can be used to distinguish among closely related species commonly display large intraspecific variations, but they can yield low success rates in DNA sequencing. To identify the DNA barcodes for the differentiation of closely related species, we used a computational algorithm, called the Sequence Diversity Gap Analyzer (SeqDivGap), which can rank all regions based on the scale of an index called Diversity Gap (data not shown). Particularly, the Diversity Gap was defined as the difference between inter- and intra-specific diversity of a DNA region. It is conceptually similar to DNA barcoding gap, but with different calculation methods [17].
Because plastids are maternally inherited in most plant species, nuclear genomes have several advantages in identifying the real relationship among species, especially if there were hybridization among different species. However, it is still rather expansive to obtained the complete nuclear genome sequence of a species, as a result, target enrichment has been used to generate a subset of all genes for phylogenetic comparison [14]. In particular, a set of probes to capture 353 low-copy nuclear genes have been designed to work across angiosperms for classification and identification [18].
In summary, a combined genome skimming strategy was used to obtain the complete plastomes of three Atractylodes species. The plastomes were characterized in detail and we identified a molecular marker that can be used to distinguish the three closely related species based on the ranking of the index Diversity Gaps. Comparison of the nuclear genes identified one sequence suggesting that A. macrocephala may be a hybrid species of A. lancea and A. chinensis. The plastome DNA markers, and nuclear gene sequences reported here could provide a valuable genetic resource for genetic diversity, phylogenetic evolution and taxonomy studies of the Asteraceae family.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and total DNA extraction and sequencing
We collected fresh leaves of A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala from the Institute of Medicinal Plant Development (IMPLAD), Beijing, China. All samples were identified by Professor Zhao Zhang of IMPLAD. The voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of the IMPLAD (S1 Table). Total DNA was extracted using a plant genomic DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing). DNA quality was assessed by electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gel, and the quantity was examined using Qubit 3.0 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Approximately 500 ng of DNA was used to construct a library with insert size of 500 bps, and it was sequenced according to the manufacturer’s instructions for MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). A total of 5.8, 5.9, and 6.0 Gbs of raw data from A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala, respectively, were produced with 250 bps pair-end read lengths. The raw data was deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number of PRJNA556560.
Plastome assembly and annotation
The paired-end reads were filtered against all plastome sequences available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using BLASTN with an e-value cutoff of 1e-5. The extracted reads were assembled using SPAdes (v3.10.1), and the resulting contigs were extended by a python script [19]. Afterward, the extended contigs were further assembled by the Seqman module of DNAStar (v6.10.01) [20]. The correctness of the complete draft plastome was validated by mapping all raw reads against the reference genomes using Bowtie 2 (v2.0.1) [21]. Results were visualized using Tablet [22]. Gene annotation was performed using CpGAVAS2 web service [23–25], and the initial annotations were edited manually by Apollo genome editor [26]. The circular map was generated using OrganellarGenomeDRAW [27].
Genome feature identification and comparative analysis
The REPuter web service was used to identify four types of sequence repeats, including forward, palindromic, reverse, and complement repeats [28]. The minimal repeat size was set at 30 bp, and the cutoff for similarities among the repeat units was set at 90%. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were predicted using MISA Perl Script with the following thresholds: eight units of mononucleotides; four units of di- and tri-nucleotides; and three units of tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotides [29]. Indels and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed on the basis of sequence alignments using DnaSP version 5.1 [30]. We compared the plastomes of three Atractylodes species by using the software mVISTA in Shuffle-LAGAN mode with the plastome of A. lancea as the reference [31]. The codon usage distribution was investigated by using the software CodonW (University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA).
Phylogenetic analyses
To determine the phylogenetic position of the three Atractylodes species, we downloaded 37 complete plastome protein-coding sequences from GenBank, including those of Nymphoides coronata and Menyanthes trifoliata from Menyanthaceae as outgroups (S2 Table). A total of 64 common protein-coding gene sequences in all of the 40 species were obtained by manual detection (PSBA, MATK, RPS16, PSBK, PSBI, PETN, PSBM, RPOB, RPOC2, RPS2, ATPI, ATPH, ATPF, ATPA, PSBD, PSAB, PSAA, YCF3, RPS4, NDHJ, NDHK, NDHC, ATPE, ATPB, PSAI, YCF4, CEMA, PETA, PSBJ, PSBF, PSBE, PETL, PETG, PSAJ, RPL33, RPS18, RPL20, RPS12, CLPP, PSBT, PSBN, PSBH, PETB, PETD, RPS11, RPL36, RPS8, RPL14, RPL16, RPS3, RPL22, RPL23, RPS7, RPS15, NDHH, NDHA, NDHI, NDHG, NDHE, PSAC, NDHD, CCSA, RPL32, NDHF). We aligned these sequences using the ClustalW algorithm [32]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using maximum likelihood method implemented in the software RAxML [33]. The parameters were “raxmlHPC-PTHREADS-SSE3 -f a -N 1000 -m PROTGAMMACPREV/GTRGAMMA -x 551314260 -p 551314260 -o NC_041436,NC_041484 -T 20”. The significant level of the phylogenetic tree was assessed by bootstrap testing with 1000 replications.
Identification and validation of molecular markers for the three Atractylodes species
To authenticate the three Atractylodes species, we developed an algorithm called seqDivGap (not published) for the research of molecular markers. On the basis of the results predicted by the seqDivGap software, we selected seven regions with the highest likelihood of containing good molecular markers. Eleven pairs of primers were designed using NCBI’s Primer BLAST tool (S3 Table). We collected 5 individuals from each species from the botanical garden in IMPLAD. DNA samples were extracted and then subjected to PCR amplification using the seven pairs of primers on a Pro Flex PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR experiments were conducted under the following conditions: pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of amplification at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, followed with a final extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The PCR reaction mixture contained 12.5 μl of Taq MasterMix (2 ×), 1 μl of forward primer (10 μM), 1 μl of reverse primer (10 μM), and purified chloroplast DNA (< 1 μg) [8]. The PCR products were evaluated with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Only single bands were subjected to Sanger sequencing. In addtion, we collected 40, 18 and 18 samples from the markers that claimed to be A. lancea, A. chinensis and A. macrocephala respectively. These samples were analyzed following the same procedure described above except that only the one primer pair cz11 were used.
Variation analysis for target sequences
We mapped all the reads to the target (marker) sequence to determine the diversity levels at a particular locus. Mapping was conducted by extracting a fragment from the plastome with a total length of 600 bps and the target region in the middle. This sequence was used to search against the NGS reads produced previously for the three species using BLASTN with an e-value cutoff of 1e-5. The reads passing the cutoff value were selected and aligned to the target sequence by using Clustalw2. Finally, the alignments were extracted using the extractalign program in the EMBOSS package [34]. The types and frequencies of reads mapped to the target sequence for each species were calculated.
Analysis of the relationship of three Atractylodes species with nuclear genes
A universal probe set of 353 nuclear genes from any flowering plant designed from Matthew GJ et al [18] were used as our target sequences. The length of the probes was 80 to 120 bps, which came from 42 angiosperms and have been tested useful in 283 species. The probe sequences are publicly available under a CC-BY-SA license at github.com/mossmatters/Angiosperms.
We used the pipeline HybPiper (v1.2) (https://github.com/mossmatters/HybPiper) with the default settings to process our cleaned sequence data [14]. Briefly, reads were mapped to target probe sequences using BWA. And those reads that were successfully mapped were assembled into contigs using SPAdes. The assembled contigs are aligned to the target Atractylodes gene sequence using Exonerate. Ideally, HybPiper identifies a single contig corresponding to each Atractylodes gene sequence. However, if paralogs exist, SPAdes might produce multiple contigs, each corresponding to one paralog of the target Atractylodes gene. Phylogenetic tree was constructed with nuclear genes by using RaxML with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Results
Structural organization of the three plastomes
We obtained the plastomes of A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala using the genome-skimming strategy. The sequences have been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers: MG874804, MG874805, and MN661162. The schematic representations of the three plastomes are shown in Fig 1, and their general features are presented in Table 1. A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala show total lengths of 153,201, 153,258, and 153,261 bps, respectively. All three genomes display the typical quadripartite structure with pairs of inverted repeats (IRs) of 25,148, 25,148 and 25,154 bps in length separated by large single-copy (LSC) regions of 84,249, 84,282 and 84,280 bps long and small single-copy (SSC) regions of 18,656, 18,680 and 18,673 bps in length, respectively.
Table 1. Summary of the plastome features for the three Atractylodes species.
Feature | A. chinensis | A. macrocephala | A. lancea | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Length (bp) | Total | 153258 | 153261 | 153201 |
LSC | 84282 | 84280 | 84249 | |
SSC | 18680 | 18673 | 18656 | |
IR | 25148 | 25154 | 25148 | |
GC content (%) | Total | 37.7 | 37.7 | 37.7 |
LSC | 35.8 | 35.8 | 35.8 | |
SSC | 31.5 | 31.5 | 31.5 | |
IR | 43.2 | 43.2 | 43.2 | |
No. of genes | Total | 132 | 130 | 132 |
Protein coding | 87 | 85 | 87 | |
tRNA | 37 | 37 | 37 | |
rRNA | 8 | 8 | 8 |
IR = Inverted repeat region; LSC = Large single-copy region; SSC = Small single-copy region.
Overall, the GC content is 37.7% in all three species. This value is lower than that of IR regions (43.2%) and higher than that of the LSC (35.8%) and SSC regions (31.5%), which suggested that the LSC, SSC, and IR regions may present different origins or selection pressures. The high GC content in the IR regions is attributed to the four rRNA genes with high GC content in the regions.
With regard to gene content, the three genomes are highly conserved. A. lancea and A. chinensis contain 132 genes, while A. macrocephala has 130 genes, all of them include 119 distinct genes, and encode 78 proteins, 37 tRNAs, and four rRNAs (Table 2). Seven genes, namely, rpl23, ycf1, ycf2, ycf15, ndhB, rps7, and rps12, and all rRNA genes are found in the IR regions (Fig 1). The genome shows 21 intron-containing genes, including 11 protein-coding genes and 8 tRNA genes with one intron and two protein-coding genes (clpP and ycf3) with two introns (S4 Table) in all three species. The rps12 gene is a special trans-splicing gene: the 5' exon is in the LSC region, and the 3' exon is located in the IR region. This arrangement is similar to those found in other plant species, such as Olea europaea L. [14].
Table 2. Gene contents of the three Atractylodes plastomes.
No. | Group of genes | Gene names | Amount |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ATP synthase | atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF, atpH, atpI | 6 |
2 | Photosystem II | psbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbM, psbN, psbT, psbZ, ycf3 | 14 |
3 | NADH-dehydrogenase | ndhA, ndhB(×2), ndhC, ndhD, ndhE, ndhF, ndhG, ndhH, ndhI, ndhJ, ndhK | 12 |
4 | Cytochrome b/f complex | petA, petB, petD, petG, petL, petN | 6 |
5 | Photosystem I | psaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ | 5 |
6 | Rubisco large subunit | rbcL | 1 |
7 | Transfer RNAs | 37 tRNAs (eight contains one intron, seven in the IRs) | 37 |
8 | Ribosomal RNAs | rrn16S(×2), rrn23S(×2), rrn4.5S(×2), rrn5S(×2) | 8 |
9 | RNA polymerase | rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1, rpoC2, | 4 |
10 | Small ribosome subunit | rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7(×2), rps8, rps11, rps12(×2), rps14, rps15, rps16, rps18, rps19 | 14 |
11 | Large ribosome subunit | rpl14, rpl16, rpl2(×2), rpl20, rpl22, rpl23(×2), rpl32, rpl33, rpl36 | 11 |
12 | Other genes | accD, ccsA, cemA, clpP, infA, matK | 6 |
13 | Proteins of unknown function | ycf1 (×3*, ×1**), ycf2(×2), ycf4, ycf15(×2) | 8*/6** |
*: A lancea and A. chinensis;
**: A. macrocephala.
A total of 87 protein-coding genes coding for 10,922 codons in the plastomes are observed in the three plant species. Among these codons, isoleucine and cysteine show the highest and lowest frequencies represented by 1,152 (10.55%) and 114 (1.04%) codons, respectively (S5 Table). The codon usage of protein-coding genes in the three plastomes is summarized in S5 Table. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values of the same codon among the three species are similar (S1 Fig). In addition, the A/T contents for the first, second, and third codon positions within the protein-coding regions (CDS) of the plastomes are 58.32%, 63.18%, and 68.20%, respectively. Evidently, a bias of high A/T ratio at the third codon position is detected, which is similar to those observed in other land plants [18].
Repeat analyses in the three plastomes
Repeat sequences play an important role in the creation of genetic diversity in terms of genome lengths and structural rearrangement [35]. We analyzed the structure and distribution of the repeats in the plastomes of A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala, and the details are shown in S6 Table. Correspondingly, a total of 39, 37, and 39 repeats longer than 30 bps were detected in the three plastomes, respectively, with similarities higher than 90%. Results revealed similarities in the lengths and number of repeats across the three plastomes. A. lancea shows 19 forward and 20 palindromic repeats, A. chinensis displays 18 forward and 19 palindromic repeats, and A. macrocephala exhibits 19 forward and 20 palindromic repeats. Most repeats are distributed within the IGS, and a majority of repeats show lengths between 30 bps and 40 bps (S2 Fig).
SSRs are tandemly repeated DNA sequences consisting of 1–6 nucleotide repeat units, also known as microsatellites, which are distributed throughout the plastomes [36]. SSRs are widely used as molecular markers in population genetics, species identification, and phylogenetic investigations based on their high-degree variations [37]. We identified a total of 48 SSRs in the three plastomes after the analyses (S7 Table). The SSRs are mostly distributed in the IGS and intron sequences. Most mononucleotide repeats consist of A/T repeats, and the AT/AT dinucleotide repeats are the most common type. These results are in accordance with the previous report that SSRs from plastomes are generally composed of short polyA or polyT repeats, and they rarely contain tandem G or C repeats in many plants [38]. In total, nine SSRs were identified in the CDS of six genes in the three species, including rpoB, rpoC1, rpoC2, psbC, rpoA, and ycf1. Results indicated that the three plastomes are highly conserved in terms of the numbers and the GC content of SSRs.
Discovery of indels and variation sites among the three plastomes
Indels and SNP sites are common events in the evolution of higher-plant plastomes [39]. These mutations provide information that is useful for resolving evolutionary relationships in phylogenetic analyses of related taxa [40]. We detected 44 indels among A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala (S8 Table), in which 37, 3, and 4 are located in the IGS, intronic regions, and CDS, respectively. Most indels range from 1 bp to 6 bps in length, and seven indels are longer than 10 bps. The longest indel with the length of 24 bps was found in the CDS of psbN. We also detected 111 single nucleotide diversity sites in the plant species (S9 Table), 42 of which are located in the CDS. In particular, the ycf1 gene contains 10 variation sites, thereby representing a variation hotspot.
Comparative analyses on the three plastomes
The plastomes of A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala were compared and identified divergent regions (Fig 2). The A. lancea plastome serves as the reference. The genome organizations and sequences from the three plastomes are highly conserved and similar. Results revealed that the IR regions are more highly conserved than the LSC and SSC regions, and the coding regions are more conservative than the noncoding counterparts. We also found that the most divergent coding regions in the three plastomes are rpbB and ycf1 genes. Moreover, many noncoding regions, such as psbC-psbZ, psbZ-rps14, rps4-trnF, and atpB-rbcL, show high degree of sequence divergence.
Phylogenetic analyses using plastome data
Phylogenetic relationships within the order of Asterales have been resolved in recent published reports. However, the position of Atractylodes in the family of Asteraceae remains controversial [4]. To determine the phylogenetic relationship of A. lancea, A. chinensis, and A. macrocephala, the plastomes of 35 other Asteraceae species and those of Nymphoides coronata and Menyanthes trifoliata from Menyanthaceae were downloaded from GenBank (S2 Table). A total of 64 common protein-coding sequences were identified and used to establish a single alignment data matrix with 15,744 characters [15, 41, 42]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method (Fig 3). In general, all the 38 species form a lineage (Asteraceae) that is recognizably discrete from the outgroup species of Nymphoides coronata and Menyanthes trifoliata from Menyanthaceae. These 38 species are grouped into 12 clades. Almost all the nodes in the phylogenetic tree show a strong bootstrap support. The three Atractylodes species are under Cynareae, which is grouped together with Centaureinae as a clade with a strong support. By contrast, Heliantheae, Neurolaeneae, and Eupatorieae are grouped together into another clade. These results rebuilt the phylogenetic relationship of Atractylodes species at the subfamily level.
Development and validation of the molecular markers for species authentication
Using the seqDivGap algorithm, eleven regions were selected for further analyses. Primer pairs were designed for each region. Five plant individuals from each species were collected (S1 Table) and subjected to DNA extraction. The primer pairs were used to amplify the extracted plastome DNA from each individual plant, and the products were sent for Sanger sequencing. All 15 PCR products derived from the plant species were amplified and sequenced with the seven primer sets. However, only the primer pair cz11 produced good results, which was designed from region 6. The corresponding products were named as marker cz11 and were sequenced three times from each direction at least once to obtain high-quality sequencing results. The alignment of the resulting 45 sequences of the PCR products is displayed in Fig 4.
The sequences of the three species are clearly distinguished from each other: A. lancea shows a 5 bps insertion sequence of TATAT compared with that of A. chinensis (square A), and A. macrocephala presents a 6 bps insertion sequence of TCTTAC compared with that of A. chinensis (square B). Notably, the sequences of each five samples of A. lancea and A. macrocephala are the same results for the primer set of cz11, and sequence of A. chinensis present three different patterns. The PCR products for A. chinensis_1 show a single nucleotide mutation of G to A (shown red), and the PCR products for A. chinensis_3 exhibit three single nucleotide mutations from T to C, G to T, and G to A (shown red). Taken together, these findings confirmed that the identified marker (called cz11 marker) can be used to distinguish the three Atractylodes species from one to another. Hence, seqDivGap is a powerful tool in selecting the regions to isolate such markers.
To further validate the reliability of the marker cz11 to distiguish the three species, we collected plant materials from at least 3 origins for each species. At least 6 individuals were collected from each of three origins for each species (Table 3). For A. lancea, plants materials were further collected from 6, 7 and 9 individuals from three regions. All 76 individuals were subjected DNA extraction, PCR amplification with primer pair cz11 and Sanger sequencing as described above. The alignment of the 76 sequences of the PCR products is displayed in S3 Fig. For A. lancea, only 4 individuals from two geographic origins were validated successfully. The rest of them showed the same pattern as those of the A. chinensis. It is possible that the A. lancea samples were already mixed up with A. chinensis. In contrast, all 36 individuals from the A. chinensis and A. macrocephala were validated respectively, being found to have the expected marker sequences (Table 3).
Table 3. The information for the samples collected from the field and their validation results.
No. | Species Claimed | Origins of field test samples collected from China | Total number of individuals | Number of individuals having the expected marker |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | A. lancea | Ankang City, Shanxi, China | 18 | 2 |
2 | A. lancea | Suizhou City, Hubei, China | 6 | 0 |
3 | A. lancea | Harbin City, Heilongjiang, China | 7 | 2 |
4 | A. lancea | Bozhou City, Anhui, China | 9 | 0 |
5 | A. macrocephala | Bozhou City, Anhui, China | 6 | 6 |
6 | A. macrocephala | Enshi City, Hubei, China | 6 | 6 |
7 | A. macrocephala | Luohe City, Henan, China | 6 | 6 |
8 | A. chinensis | Luoyang City, Henan, China | 6 | 6 |
9 | A. chinensis | Fushun City, Liaoning, China | 6 | 6 |
10 | A. chinensis | Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, China | 6 | 6 |
Allele variation profile analyses
The Sanger sequencing results show considerably limited depth. To further understand the degree of diversity in the cz11 marker locus, the NGS data were thus used to obtain the plastomes. The NGS data were generated from mixed DNAs derived from the five individual plants. We extracted the reads covering the cz11 marker sequences with BLAST. They were subsequently mapped to the reference plastome sequences using Bowtie2. The mapping results are shown in Table 4. In total, 445, 620, and 762 reads were mapped to the sequences of A. lancea, A. macrocephala, and A. chinensis, respectively. The sequence '------AAAGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT' shows the highest frequency in A. lancea, and ' TCTTACAAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATAT-----' displays the highest frequency in A. macrocephala. These two sequences are identical to those obtained from Sanger sequencing results. The two major types of sequences in A. chinensis, namely, ' ------AAAGAAAGGTAAAAAATGACATTATAT-----' and ' ------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATAT-----', exhibit comparable frequencies. Both patterns were also observed in the Sanger sequencing results.
Table 4. Types and frequencies of individual allele sequence of the cz11 marker loci among the three Atractylodes species.
Species | Sequence Type | Frequency |
---|---|---|
A. lancea | ------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 356 |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 8 | |
------AAGGAAAAGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 3 | |
------AAGGAAAGAGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 3 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAAAGACATTATATTATAT | 3 | |
------AAAGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGAAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAAGGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATAATATAT | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATA-----T | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTAT-- | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATCT | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACCTTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAACAATGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------AAGGCAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------AAGGTAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------AATGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
------CAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATATTATAT | 2 | |
A. macrocephala | TCTTACAAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 588 |
TCTTAAAAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 2 | |
TCTTACAAGGAAAGAGAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 2 | |
TCTTACAAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATTACATTATAT----- | 2 | |
A. chinensis | ------AAGGAAAGGTAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 420 |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 309 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAAAAGACATTATAT----- | 3 | |
------AAGGAAAGGGAAAAA-TGACATTATAT----- | 3 | |
------AAGGAAAGAGAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 2 | |
------AAGGAAAGATAAAAAATGACATTATAT----- | 2 |
With regard to frequencies, the dominant alleles of A. lancea and A. macrocephala represent 80% (356/445) and 94.84% (588/620) of all NGS reads mapped to the locus, respectively. The two dominant alleles found in A. chinensis represent 40.55% (309/762) and 55.12% (420/762) of the total reads mapped. In Sanger sequencing results, the sequence frequencies for the dominant alleles in A. lancea and A. macrocephala are both 100% (15/15). The frequencies of the two dominant alleles in A. chinensis are 80% (12/15) and 20% (3/15). This result suggested that the sequences obtained using the PCR and Sanger sequencing methods are biased, and they tend to lose the nucleotide diversity.
Relationship of the three Atractylodes species using nuclear genes
Plastids are materinally inherited for most plants. It can not be used to determine the hybridization relationship among species. To overcome this limitation, we used the HybPiper software to compare the relationship of the three species based on 353 genes. Although reads were found mapping to all 353 genes, contigs were formed for 31, 30 and 24 genes in A. lancea, A. macrocephala, and A. chinensis, separately. In particular, contigs were found for 10 genes in all three species. Among them, and one gene named SLD5 (AT5G49010), had two contigs in A. macrocephala, and one contig in A. lancea, and A. chinensis, separately. SLD5 is a component of the heterotetrameric GINS complex and the GINS complex is essential for both the initiation and elongation stages of eukaryotic DNA replication. Then, multiple sequence alignment was performed for the four contigs in three species, using those sequences from A. thaliana as the outgroup (Fig 5A). Subsequently, phylogenetic analyses were performed with the alignment. Surprisingly, one contig in A. macrocephala was grouped with that of A. lancea, and the other contig of A. macrocephala was grouped with the contig in A. chinensis (Fig 5B). It suggests that A. macrocephala may be a hybrid species of A. lancea and A. chinensis.
Discussion
In this study, we (1) sequenced the plastomes for three Atractylodes species using the next-generation DNA sequencing technology; (2) annotated the plastomes; (3) identified indels, SSRs, tandem repeats, and SNPs of plastomes; (4) carried out a phylogenetic analysis of 40 related plastomes based on 64 conserved proteins; (5) identified 11 regions that potentially harbor good molecular markers; and (6) experimentally validated that top-ranked region harbors molecular markers; (7) clarify the relationship of the three species using nuclear genes. Our results provide a basis for future studies on the evolution of plastomes from Atractylodes species. In addition, a marker was identified to differentiate the closely related Atractylodes species. This study also discovered markers from less variable hyperplasmic regions. And for the first time, we report that A. macrocephala maybe a hybrid species of A. lancea and A. chinensis. However, this conclusion is rather weak and additional data are needed to confirm if this hypothesis is correct. If this is confirmed, it would explain the difficulty in distinguishing these species by chemical components and DNA barcodes in previous studies.
Our results contributed to the phylogenetic classification of Atractylodes species. Previous reports have established the phylogenetic relationship of these three Atractylodes species based on trnL-F sequences and ITS region sequences. The two trees are incongruent [1, 2, 4]. In the present study, we used 64 protein sequences to construct the phylogenetic trees, which contain many informative sites and generate a highly congruent tree.
The marker identified in this study for Atractylodes species differentiation is superior to previous markers, such as the trnK coding region and ITS region in several aspects. In the trnK coding region, the sequences of A. lancea and A. chinensis only differ at ployA sites. The number of nucleotides in the polyA stretch in the plastome is unstable in the same species [1,3]. Moreover, the PCR product of trnK gene is 2.6 kbs, which is considerably too long to be sequenced entirely using the Sanger method at a time. In the ITS regions, the differentiation of the three Atractylodes species depends on the substitution of seven nucleotide sites. The ITS regions are multiallelic. The differences of these substitution sites at intraspecific levels are unclear. Consequently, the use of ITS sequences for species determination is questionable. Taken together, identifying Atractylodes species by trnK or ITS sequences at the species and intraspecific levels is difficult [3]. We also systematically analyzed inter- and intraspecific nucleotide diversities of the cz11 markers based on the results obtained from Sanger sequencing and the NGS technologies. We also validated the identified markers for five individuals from each of the three species and confirmed the effectiveness of the cz11 marker. To further validate the reliability of cz11 marker, different individuals from different origins were validated. The cz11 marker can distinguish the A. chinensis and A. macrocephala species very reliably. However, using this marker, only 4 out of 40 claimed A. lancea samples were identified as A. lancea, while the other 36 were identifed as A. chinensis. Considering that the voucher samples from the garden of IMPLAD have been identified by experts. The most likely explanation is that some of the “A. lancea” samples from the market had already been “contaminated” with A. chinensis. Additional studies are needed to further clarify this issue. The cz11 marker could be of higher value for identifying the authenticity of medicinal materials of Atractylodes.
Previously, we showed the presence of intraspecific and heterplasmic variable regions in the plastome [43]. With the continuous influx of deep-sequencing data, heteroplasmicity should be the rule over the exception in the plastomes by considering the presence of multiple plastids in any given cell. Whether these heteroplasmic variable regions can be used for differentiating closely related species at the species or subspecies levels is also unclear. In this study, we initially designed 12 primer pairs manually by determining the variable regions among the consensus sequences of the three plastomes. Nevertheless, 11 out of the 12 primers generate no successful sequences using Sanger sequencing technology. These interspecific variable regions also show a high degree of heteroplasmicity. Therefore, a correlation exists between inter- and intraspecific variabilities. The primer pairs essentially amplify a set of products with high degree of variations (e.g., variable length), which prevent the yield of unambiguous sequences. The ideal regions for marker discovery may be those more variable interspecifically and less variable intraspecifically.
We developed the seqDivGap algorithm to identify these kinds of regions. Essentially, the seqDivGap takes advantage of the NGS reads to calculate the intraspecific nucleotide diversity. Afterward, we ranked the regions based on large interspecific diversity, low intraspecific diversity, and large difference between inter- and intraspecific diversities. Our previous experience suggested that the presence of polynucleotide stretches may result in poor sequencing quality due to the variable length of these stretches. We subsequently included additional criteria into the seqDivGap to screen the regions with long polynucleotides. Experimental validation proved that the primer designed based on the top ranked regions can identify variable regions that can generate high-quality sequences.
There are several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that A. macrocephala be the hybrid of A. lancea and A. chinensis. Firstly, the hybridization phenomenon of A. lancea and A. chinensis was shown possible in a previous study [3]. Secondly, the distribution area of A. macrocephala was between those of the A. lancea and the A. chinensis, making the above hypothesis possbile geographically. Thirdly, in this study, we found one gene named SLD5 had two contigs in A. macrocephala. One was clustered together with a sequence of A. lancea, and the other was clustered together with a sequence of A. chinensis in the phylogenetic tree, suggesting that A. macrocephala may be a hybrid of the other two species. On the other hand, the support of this hypothesis is relatively weak. Firstly, the monophyly and position of A. macrocephala described in previous phylogenetic studies suggested that it was not likely a hybrid of A. lancea and the A. chinensis [44, 45]. Secondly, only one gene was found to demonstate this pattern of hybridization in the current study. Taking together, this hypothesis needed to be tested in the future using data of higher sequencing depth and larger numbers of single copy genes.
Conclusions
The complete plastomes of three Atractylodes species from Asteraceae were assembled, annotated and analyzed. The gene content, gene order, genome structure, SSRs and long repeats, and codon usage are largely similar. We then resolved the phylogenetic relationships of the three species in the family of Asteraceae with complete plastome sequences and nuclear genes. Finally, we identified a marker based on interspecific and intraspecific nucleotide diversity gaps to distinguish the three species. The maker was validated with 100% success rate using voucher samples. The barcode can be used to distinguish the three Atractylodes species, which will be invaluable to ensure the correct usage of Atractylodes materials in health food and herbal drugs.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. The raw sequence data was deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number of PRJNA556560.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Projects for the Standardization of Traditional Chinese Medicines (2017-110108-83-03-001423), Innovation Funds for Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-3-016, 2017-I2M-1-013] of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, funds from National Science Foundation of China [81872966], National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China [2018FY100705] and The National Mega-Project for Innovative Drugs [2019ZX09735-002]. The funders were not involved in the study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.
References
- 1.Mizukami H, Shimizu R, Kohjyouma M, Kohda H, Kawanishi F, Hiraoka N. Phylogenetic analysis of Atractylodes plants based on chloroplast trnK sequence. Biol Pharm Bull. 1998;21(5):474–478. 10.1248/bpb.21.474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim JH, Doh EJ, Lee G. Evaluation of medicinal categorization of Atractylodes japonica Koidz. by using internal transcribed spacer sequencing analysis and HPLC fingerprinting combined with statistical tools. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:2926819. 10.1155/2016/2926819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shiba M, Kondo K, Miki E, Yamaji H, Morota T, Terabayashi S, et al. Identification of medicinal Atractylodes based on ITS sequences of nrDNA. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29(2):315–320. 10.1248/bpb.29.315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yuan JH, Sun S, Peng F, Feng X, Zheng YH, Xia B. Genetic variations in trnL-F sequence and phylogenetic clustering of Lycoris species. China J Chin Mater Med. 2008;33(13):1523–1527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shimato Y, Ota M, Asai K, Atsumi T, Tabuchi Y, Makino T. Comparison of byakujutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) and sojutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) on anti-inflammatory and immunostimulative effects in vitro. J Nat Med. 2018;72(1):192–201. 10.1007/s11418-017-1131-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Agarwal M, Shrivastava N, Padh H. Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27(4):617–631. 10.1007/s00299-008-0507-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kress WJ. Plant DNA barcodes: Applications today and in the future. J Syst Evol. 2017;55(4):291–307. 10.1111/jse.12254 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ma XQ, Duan JA, Zhu DY, Dong TT, Tsim KW. Species identification of Radix astragali (Huangqi) by DNA sequence of its 5S-rRNA spacer domain. Phytochemistry. 2000;54(4):363–368. 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00111-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Daniell H, Lin CS, Yu M, Chang WJ. Chloroplast genomes: diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):134 10.1186/s13059-016-1004-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.He L, Qian J, Li X, Sun Z, Xu X, Chen S. Complete chloroplast genome of medicinal plant Lonicera japonica: genome rearrangement, intron gain and loss, and implications for phylogenetic studies. Molecules. 2017;22(2):pii: E249. 10.3390/molecules22020249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Park I, Yang S, Choi G, Kim WJ, Moon BC. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of Aconitum pseudolaeve and Aconitum longecassidatum, and development of molecular markers for distinguishing species in the Aconitum Subgenus Lycoctonum. Molecules. 2017;22(11):pii: E2012. 10.3390/molecules22112012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dong W, Xu C, Li W, Xie X, Lu Y, Liu Y, et al. Phylogenetic resolution in Juglans based on complete chloroplast genomes and nuclear DNA sequences. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1148 10.3389/fpls.2017.01148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang Y, Li X, Yang Z, Yang C, Yang J, Ji Y. Analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences improves phylogenetic resolution in Paris (Melanthiaceae). Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1797 10.3389/fpls.2016.01797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mariotti R, Cultrera NG, Diez CM, Baldoni L, Rubini A. Identification of new polymorphic regions and differentiation of cultivated olives (Olea europaea L.) through plastome sequence comparison. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:211 10.1186/1471-2229-10-211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuang DY, Wu H, Wang YL, Gao LM, Zhang SZ, Lu L. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Magnolia kwangsiensis (Magnoliaceae): implication for DNA barcoding and population genetics. Genome. 2011;54(8):663–673. 10.1139/G11-026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou J, Chen X, Cui Y, Sun W, Li Y, Wang Y, et al. Molecular structure and phylogenetic analyses of complete chloroplast genomes of two Aristolochia medicinal species. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(9):pii: E1839. 10.3390/ijms18091839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meyer CP, Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(12):e422 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nie X, Deng P, Feng K, Liu P, Du X, You FM, et al. Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in chloroplast genomes of the Asteraceae family. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2014;32(4):828–840. 10.1007/s11105-013-0691-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(5):455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burland TG. DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:71–91. 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Langmead B. Aligning short sequencing reads with Bowtie. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. 2010;Chapter 11(Unit 11.17):Unit 11.7. 10.1002/0471250953.bi1107s32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Milne I, Bayer M, Cardle L, Shaw P, Stephen G, Wright F, et al. Tablet—next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(3):401 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu C, Shi L, Zhu Y, Chen H, Zhang J, Lin X, et al. CpGAVAS, an integrated web server for the annotation, visualization, analysis, and GenBank submission of completely sequenced chloroplast genome sequences. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:715 10.1186/1471-2164-13-715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Web Server issue):W686–9. 10.1093/nar/gki366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Laslett D, Canback B. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(1):11–16. 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lewis S, Searle S, Harris N, Gibson M, Iyer V, Richter J, et al. Apollo: a sequence annotation editor. 2002;3(12):research0082.1–82.14. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lohse M, Drechsel O, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW): a tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr Genet. 2007;52(5–6):267–274. 10.1007/s00294-007-0161-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(22):4633–4642. 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Beier S, Thiel T, Munch T, Scholz U, Mascher M. MISA-web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(16):2583–2585. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1451–1452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dubchak I. Comparative analysis and visualization of genomic sequences using VISTA browser and associated computational tools. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;395:3–16. 10.1007/978-1-59745-514-5_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Corpet F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16(22):10881–10890. 10.1093/nar/16.22.10881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16(6):276–277. 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jo YD, Park J, Kim J, Song W, Hur CG, Lee YH, et al. Complete sequencing and comparative analyses of the pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plastome revealed high frequency of tandem repeats and large insertion/deletions on pepper plastome. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(2):217–229. 10.1007/s00299-010-0929-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Powell W, Morgante M, McDevitt R, Vendramin GG, Rafalski JA. Polymorphic simple sequence repeat regions in chloroplast genomes: applications to the population genetics of pines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(17):7759–7763. 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Provan J, Corbett G, McNicol JW, Powell W. Chloroplast DNA variability in wild and cultivated rice (Oryza spp.) revealed by polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Genome. 1997;40(1):104–110. 10.1139/g97-014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang S, Shi C, Gao LZ. Plastid genome sequence of a wild woody oil species, Prinsepia utilis, provides insights into evolutionary and mutational patterns of Rosaceae chloroplast genomes. PloS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73946 10.1371/journal.pone.0073946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li ZZ, Saina JK, Gichira AW, Kyalo CM, Wang QF, Chen JM. Comparative genomics of the Balsaminaceae sister genera Hydrocera triflora and Impatiens pinfanensis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(1):pii: E319. 10.3390/ijms19010319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Luo J, Hou BW, Niu ZT, Liu W, Xue QY, Ding XY. Comparative chloroplast genomes of photosynthetic orchids: insights into evolution of the Orchidaceae and development of molecular markers for phylogenetic applications. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99016 10.1371/journal.pone.0099016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, Depamphilis CW, Leebens-Mack J, et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(49):19369–19374. 10.1073/pnas.0709121104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Moore MJ, Bell CD, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(49):19363–19368. 10.1073/pnas.0708072104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lei W, Ni D, Wang Y, Shao J, Wang X, Yang D, et al. Intraspecific and heteroplasmic variations, gene losses and inversions in the chloroplast genome of Astragalus membranaceus. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21669 10.1038/srep21669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Peng HS, Yuan QJ, Li QQ, Huang LQ. Molecular systematics of genus Atractylodes (Compositae, Cardueae): evidence from internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and trnL-F Sequences. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(11):14623–14633. 10.3390/ijms131114623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zou XX, Huang LQ, Cui GH, Yuan QJ, Peng Y, Liu Y, et al. Genetic relationships of Atractylodes plants. Acta Pharmaceut Sin. 2008;44(6):680–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. The raw sequence data was deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number of PRJNA556560.