Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jan 29;10:1734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58619-x

Author Correction: Exhaled volatile substances in children suffering from type 1 diabetes mellitus: results from a cross-sectional study

Phillip Trefz 1,, Juliane Obermeier 1, Ruth Lehbrink 2, Jochen K Schubert 1, Wolfram Miekisch 1, Dagmar-Christiane Fischer 2
PMCID: PMC6987163  PMID: 31992815

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-019-52165-x, published online 31 October 2019

The Article contains a typographical error in Table 2 for the concentration range of the patient group for DMS.

The correct Table 2 appears below as Table 1.

Table 1.

Exhaled amounts of selected alveolar VOCs in the study population.

Ethanol [ppbV] Acetone [ppbV] Isopropanol [ppbV] DMS [ppbV] Isoprene [ppbV] Pentanal [ppbV] Limonen [ppbV]
Controls 82.4a,b,c (20.7–554) 232* (186–306) 784a,b (287–28,963) 10.0a,b,c (0.99–151) 49.6a,b,c (7.44–153) 5.30a,b,c (1.36–36.9) 51.8 (4.81–1,192)
Patients 171a (44.7–1856) 238* (204–256) 1223a (481–15011) 19.6a (4.28–89.6) 112a (8.36–291) 13.5a (6.11–101) 66.7 (13.9–513)
HbA1c< 8% 150b (71.6–1203) 238 (211–256) 924c (481–2509) 20.0b (4.53–89.6) 105b (49.0–291) 10.6b,d (6.11–30.9) 66.7 (14.8–513)
HbA1c> 8% 221c (44.7–1856) 240 (204–255) 1607b,c (686–15011) 17.1c (4.28–44.1) 118c (8.36–265) 16.2c,d (8.27–101) 66.8 (13.9–209)

Data is given as median and range. Superscripts denote significantly different concentrations of the respective analytes between identically labelled groups. DMS, dimethylsulfide.

acontrols vs patients: p < 0.001 for ethanol, DMS, isoprene, and pentanal, p = 0.002 for isopropanol; bcontrols vs patients with good metabolic control (HbA1c < 8%): p < 0.001 for ethanol, DMS, isoprene, and pentanal; ccontrols vs patients with poor metabolic control (HbA1c > 8%): p < 0.001 for ethanol, isopropanol, isoprene, and pentanal, p = 0.03 for DMS; dpatiens with poor vs those with good metabolic control: p < 0.001 for isopropanol and p = 0.012 for pentanal.

Additionally, the Article contains an error in Figure 2 whereby the data from three diabetic patients was accidently omitted.

The correct Figure 2 appears below as Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES