Abstract
The characterization of mechanisms involved in the positive effects of probiotic bacteria in various pathophysiological conditions is a prerogative for their safe and efficient application in biomedicine. We have investigated the immunological effects of live bacteria-free supernatant collected from GABA-producing Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 on Concanavalin A-stimulated mesenteric lymph node cells (MLNC), an in vitro model of activated immune cells. We have shown that GABA containing and GABA-free supernatant of Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 have strong immunoregulatory effects on MLNC. Further, GABA produced by this strain exhibit additional inhibitory effects on proliferation, IFN-γ and IL-17 production by MLNC, and the expression of MHCII and CD80 on antigen presenting cells. At the other hand, GABA-containing supernatants displayed the strongest stimulatory effects on the expression of immunoregulatory molecules, such as Foxp3+, IL-10, TGF-β, CTLA4 and SIRP-α. By looking for the mechanisms of actions, we found that supernatants produced by BGZLS10-17 induce autophagy in different MLNC, such as CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, NK and NKT cells, as well as antigen presenting cells. Further, we showed that the stimulation of Foxp3+, IL-10 and TGF-β expression by BGZLS10-17 produced GABA is completely mediated by the induction of ATG5 dependent autophagy, and that other molecules in the supernatants display GABA-, ATG5-, Foxp3+-, IL-10- and TGF-β- independent, immunoregulatory effects.
Subject terms: Immunosuppression, Applied microbiology
Introduction
The incidence of exacerbated immune response-related diseases, especially autoimmune diseases, has been rising steadily1 but the new approaches for their treatment have not been developed sufficiently. The discovery on the important role of gut microbiota in maintaining host’s immune homeostasis2 initiated the research on immunomodulatory potential of microorganisms. In addition, to decipher the role of commensal members of gut, probiotic bacteria with potentially beneficial effects on the hosts are isolated from different sources. Probiotic bacteria are defined as ‘live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host’3. Additionally, live bacteria-free fractions of probiotics (postbiotics) could provide beneficial effects without the potential risk associated with the administration of live microorganisms4. Besides being defined as beneficial to health, the best and the safest way to apply these bacteria and/or their products in clinics is to determine the specific mechanisms of probiotic activity in appropriate immune model systems. In that sense, the mechanisms of immunomodulatory activity of different probiotic strains should be fully characterized, thus enabling the development of specific treatment for particular immune-related disease. Some of the bacterial active molecules are also being produced by eukaryotes, so the supplementation of host with such probiotic bacteria, or their postbiotic preparation, is a natural way to modulate the host’s immune functions. One of such molecules is γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a well-recognized for its role as the main inhibitory neurotransmitter5. In addition, GABA receptors have been identified in a wide range of immune cells, and they are involved in a general down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines production, making GABA an important immunomodulator as well6. The immunomodulatory role of chemically synthesized GABA has been observed in autoimmune diseases such as mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis7, mouse model of obesity8, type 1 diabetes9, and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)6, suggesting that GABA could be applied as an adjuvant treatment against autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In addition to synthetic, there are simple biosynthetic procedures of GABA with high efficiency and environmental compatibility10. The promising source of GABA for the potential treatment of exacerbated inflammation are probiotic bacteria, considering the fact that main producers of GABA belong to lactic acid bacteria (LAB)11 which have the “Qualified Presumption of Safety” (QPS) status12,13.
One of the important mechanisms of immune response regulation is autophagy14. Next to the pivotal role of autophagy in eradication of intracellular pathogens, autophagy is a homeostatic mechanism primarily involved in the removal of damaged organelles and denatured proteins through a lysosomal degradation pathway15. The autophagy proteins act in both the induction and the suppression of immune responses and vice versa, the inflammatory signals function as inducers and/or suppressants of autophagy16. Importantly, literature data suggest that deregulation of autophagy is associated with various conditions characterized by exacerbated inflammation17. Interestingly, the activation of GABAergic signaling is positively implicated in the treatment of these conditions, but based to our knowledge, the potential relation of autophagy and GABAergic signaling in inflammatory conditions have not been investigated so far. Besides the role of GABA in the induction of antimicrobial autophagy18, our group as well as studies from other groups reported the potential of some Lactobacillus species to stimulate or suppress autophagy19–21. In addition, the role of autophagy in immunomodulatory effects of GABA-producing probiotic strain have not been investigated. We have recently reported on the protective effects of GABA-producing Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17, a natural isolate from artisanal Zlatar cheese22. In this system L. brevis produced GABA only in the presence of monosodium glutamate (MSG) and displayed protective effects in an in vitro model of inflammation-induced destruction of intestinal barrier. Interestingly, it was shown that L-glutamate, a precursor of GABA, could be produced from dairy proteins by some bacteria (Streptococcus thermophilus) enabling the production of GABA-rich products by GABA-producing bacteria23 Therefore, in this study we investigated further whether this GABA-producing strain exhibit immunomodulatory effects via soluble route. Recent work of Engevik et al.24, demonstrated that GABA and other soluble molecules produced by Bifidobacterium dentium stimulate the expression of molecules involved in epithelial barrier function by autophagy-dependent mechanisms. These authors assumed that this mechanism could contribute to protective roles of this bacterium in inflammatory conditions. Besides GABA, other soluble molecules with immunomodulatory effects were described to be produced by LAB, and these are being investigated as potentially useful postbiotics25. However, the relation between GABA-producing LAB and their immunomodulatory properties has not been investigated previously. Considering recent findings on potential linkage of GABA signaling and autophagy18, we hypothesized that the direct immunomodulatory activity of GABA produced by L. brevis BGZLS10-17 include the regulation of autophagy within these immune cells.
Results and Discussion
Supernatants from Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 have immunoregulatory effects at non-toxic doses
The emerging new evidences suggests that the GABA signalling is involved in maintenance of immune system homeostasis26. Therefore, the ability of probiotic strains to produce GABA seems as a good strategy to modulate immunological responses in different inflammatory diseases. In our previous study, we tested the GABA-producing ability of different LAB strains isolated from dairy products, and found that L. brevis BGZLS10-17 displays the strongest capacity to produce GABA. Namely, this live bacteria-free GABA-containing supernatant (4 mM GABA in 2.5% supernatant; MRS/MSG) inhibited the inflammation induced-destruction of gut epithelial cell barrier significantly more than the corresponding supernatants which did not contain GABA (MRS)22. Moreover, by using an in vivo model of inflammatory disease, i.e. experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) (an animal model of multiple sclerosis), we found that the oral administration of live bacteria or 48 h bacteria-free supernatant containing GABA, alleviated the EAE symptoms in this model27, pointing to their immunoregulatory effects in vivo. To further elucidate the mechanisms of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 actions, our aim in this work was to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of GABA-producing L. brevis BGZLS10-17 strain by using a model of Concanavaline A (ConA)-stimulated mesenteric lymph node cells (MLNC), as MLN is a critical secondary lymphoid organ draining guts. Con-A is commonly used as a polyclonal activator of lymphocytes, crosslinking the molecules on antigen presenting cells and lymphocytes, which is followed by the stimulation of lymphocytes’ proliferation and cytokines production28. Therefore, in order to decipher the role of GABA produced by this strain, we tested and compared the effects of supernatants collected after the cultivation of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 in conditions where they do not produce GABA (MRS) and in GABA-producing conditions (in the presence of MSG-MRS/MSG). Additionally, the effects of GABA produced by L. brevis BGZLS10-17 during the cultivation were compared with the effects of artificial GABA added in the same concentration as found in the supernatant collected from bacterial culture without MSG (MRS/art.GABA).
In order to exclude the possibility that the immunological effects are due to cytotoxicity of the supernatants, we first analysed the dose dependent toxicity in the culture of MLNC. We found that 2.5% supernatants had no significant cytotoxic effects on stimulated MLNC after 24 h, 48 h and 72 h treatment (Fig. 1), unlike the higher doses (5% or 10%). The toxicity of supernatants at higher doses most likely comes from MRS medium components because there is no difference between treatments (MRS/MSG, MRS/art. GABA) and the control group (MRS). This is in accordance with the results published by other groups29. However, the treatments with non-cytotoxic concentrations of the supernatants (2.5%) significantly reduced the metabolic activity of ConA-stimulated MLNC, as compared to non-treated cells (Fig. 2a), pointing to the potential immunomodulatory effects of BGZLS10-17 supernatants. Interestingly, the cultures of ConA-stimulated MLNC treated with the supernatants containing GABA produced by L. brevis BGZLS10-17 strain or artificial GABA displayed significantly lower metabolic activity in comparison to the MLNC cultures treated with supernatant without GABA (MRS), which pointed to additional immunoregulatory effects of GABA contained in L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants. The inhibitory effects of GABA-free L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatant could be mediated by other soluble molecules previously described to modulate functions of immune system such as protein p4030, lactocepin31 and other uncharacterized soluble molecules29. Additionally, we checked the effect of fresh MRS added in the same concentration as the supernatants from bacterial cultures (2.5% (12.5 μl) MRS), and found that the fresh MRS media had no significant effects on the metabolic activity of MLNC (Supplementary Fig. 1a).
To further investigate the immunomodulatory effects of the supernatants, we measured the proliferation of ConA-stimulated MLNC and the levels of IL-17 and IFN-γ production after 72 h cultures. These results showed that GABA-containing and GABA-free L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants display strong anti-proliferative effects on ConA-stimulated MLNC (Fig. 2b). In accordance with this, all tested supernatants showed inhibitory effects on the production of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-17A and IFN-γ by MLNC (Fig. 2c,d). Again, GABA containing supernatants (MRS/MSG and MRS/art. GABA) had an additional inhibitory effect on the production of IL-17A and IFN-γ, as compared to the effects of supernatant without GABA (MRS). Thereby, the fresh MRS medium had no significant effects on the production of IL-17 and IFN-γ (Supplementary Fig. 1b,c). IL-17 and IFN-γ are the hallmarks of T helper (Th)17 and Th1 cells, respectively, which are critically involved in proinflammatory responses and exacerbation of autoimmune diseases32. The main immunoregulatory mechanism involved in downregulation of Th17 and Th1 cell responses involve the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-β) by Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg)33.
Therefore, we investigated how L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants act on Foxp3, IL-10 and TGF-β expression in MLNC. We found that all tested supernatants significantly stimulated the expression of Foxp3 mRNA and immunoregulatory cytokine TGF-β mRNA, as well as the production of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in comparison to non-treated ConA-stimulated MLNC. The higher levels of Foxp3 mRNA and TGF-β mRNA were measured in MLNC treated with GABA containing supernatants (MRS/MSG and MRS/art. GABA) compared to supernatants without GABA (MRS) (Fig. 3a,b). In addition, GABA containing supernatants (MRS/MSG and MRS/art. GABA) displayed a stronger stimulatory effect on IL-10 production by MLNC (Fig. 3c).
These results indicated that L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants exhibit immunoregulatory effects and induce Foxp3, IL-10 and TGF-β expression. However, they also suggest that GABA has an additional immunomodulatory effect in this model system. It was suggested previously that the autophagy have important roles in immune response homeostasis16, as well as in induction and functions of Foxp3+ Treg34. In accordance with that, we further analysed whether L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants affect autophagy in MLNC.
Supernatants from Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 induce autophagy in MLNC
The process of autophagy is commonly monitored by the expression analysis of different proteins associated with autophagosome initiation, nucleation, elongation and regulation35. The most indicative marker for autophagy is the conjugation of cytosolic form of microtubule-associated protein light chain 3, LC3 (LC3I), with a phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) that, when integrated into the autophagosomal membrane is named LC3II36. LC3II remains associated during the whole autophagy process, and the closed autophagic vesicle is then addressed to lysosomes during the maturation phase. Therefore, the expression of LC3I and II in Con-A-stimulated MLNC treated with L. brevis BGZLS10-17 was monitored after 24 h (Supplementary Fig. 2a). It was observed that only GABA-containing supernatants (MRS/MSG and MRS/art.GABA) significantly increased the ratio of LC3II/LC3I. Surprisingly, GABA-free (MRS) supernatants increased LC3II/LC3I ratio, but the effect was not statistically significant. Since the ratio of LC3II/LC3I might be affected by the simultaneous lysosomal degradation of LC3II, we also checked whether similar phenomenon could be observed with the blocking of lysosomal acidification by chloroquine (CQ) (Suplementary Fig. 2b). In these experiments, all supernatants significantly increased the LC3II/LC3I ratio compared to control. However, GABA-containing supernatants, again, displayed significantly stronger effects on the upregulation of LC3II/LC3I ratio compared to GABA-free (MRS) supernatant.
MLNC is a heterogeneous cell population containing different leucocytes including T, B, nature killer (NK), NK T cells (NKT), dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages (Mf). The proliferation and the cytokines production in the model system of ConA-induced stimulation of MLNC rely on lectin mediated crosslinking of surface receptors on antigen presenting cells (APC predominantly DC, Mf and B cells) and responder lymphocytes28. Considering that the increase of LC3II/LC3I ratio was detected in whole MLNC population, we next wondered which population of MLNC is specifically affected by L. brevis supernatants. Thereby, the LC3II expression was monitored after the intracellular staining37 of CQ treated MLNC, 24 h after the treatment with supernatants. The discrimination between T, NKT and NK cells was monitored according to CD3 and CD161 surface staining, as previously described38. It was found that the highest up-regulation of LC3II occurs within CD4+T, CD8+ T, NK (CD161+ CD3−) and NKT (CD161+ CD3+) cells (Fig. 4). Thereby, GABA-containing supernatants (MRS/MSG and MRS/art.GABA) showed the strongest effect on up-regulation of LC3II. Taking into account that within these cells lie the main producers of IFN-γ and IL-1739,40, the suppression of IL17 and IFN-γ by GABA containing supernatants could be explained by autophagy-dependent mechanisms. Also, the induction of autophagy in CD4+ T cells could be involved in the mechanism of Treg (CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+) induction and their functions such as increased IL-10 and TGF-β production41. The production of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β is not an exclusive feature of Tregs, but they could be produced by different tolerogenic immune cells, such as regulatory B cells, DC and Mf42. These cytokines were shown to prevent DC activation and induce the generation of tolerogenic DC as well43–45.
With that in mind, we also analysed the expression of LC3II within DC (OX62+) (Fig. 5), B cells (HIS24+ cells, Supplementary Fig. 3) and macrophages (CD68+ cells, Supplementary Fig. 4). The analysis showed that LC3 expression is indeed stimulated in all these cells by the supernatants, but the increase in APC was less pronounced than in T lymphocytes, NKT and NK cells. GABA-containing supernatants induced the expression of LC3II within all APC (OX62+DC, B cells and Mf). In contrast, GABA-free (MRS) supernatants induced LC3II expression in DC and Mf, but not in B cells. According to the analysis of MHC class II expression, the supernatants did not affect significantly% of MHC class II+ DC, Mf and B, but the relative expression/cell (MFI) was reduced after the treatment with supernatants. Autophagy was shown previously to be tightly regulated with MHC class II expression and antigen presentation46, but we also described that it is involved in immunomodulation and induction of tolerogenic DC47. In line with this, here we found that DC and B cells displayed lower expression of CD80 upon the treatment with supernatants, especially with GABA-containing supernatants. Additionally, we observed that the expression of checkpoint inhibitor CTLA-4 on B cells is up-regulated after the treatment with L. brevis supernatants. CD80 was shown to deliver stimulatory signal to T cells via CD2848. However, CD80 can also interact with CTLA-4, which rather provide immunoregulatory signals and induces regulatory T cells and regulatory B cells49. Additionally, it was shown that CTLA-4 expression, similarly as Foxp3, is under the control of autophagy50. Therefore, both down-regulation of CD80 and up-regulation of checkpoint inhibitor CTLA-4 can lead to overall immunoregulatory effects observed in MLNC after the treatment with L. brevis supernatants. Besides CTLA-4, we observed that Mf treated with the supernatants also up-regulated another checkpoint inhibitor, SIRP-α. It was shown previously that CD47 ligation of SIRP-α on Mf, prevents their phagocytotic capacity and the induction of antitumor proinflammatory response, which was proposed as the basis for new checkpoint blockade system in cancer immunotherapy51. Besides, it was shown that this blockade could be potentiated by blocking autophagy simultaneously52, suggesting that the expression and functions of SIRP-α in Mf are positively regulated by autophagy.
Supernatants from Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 induce different autophagy signaling depending on GABA presence in the supernatant
The roles of proteins involved in different autophagy dependent homeostatic or pathophysiological conditions are increasingly being proven. Autophagy-related gene (ATG) proteins are known as the ‘core machinery’ of autophagy53. Thus, Unc51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) complex initiates phagophore formation54. In the following sequences, ULK1 activates Beclin-1, which is implicated in the endoplasmic reticulum-derived phagophore formation55. Beclin-1 interacts with UV resistance-associated gene (UVRAG) to promote autophagosome formation56. When phagophore is formed, ATG5 is implicated in autophagosome elongation phase leading to the conversion of soluble cytosolic form of LC3 (LC3I) into lipid bound LC3II form. LC3 and GABARAP (gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor) are two of seven members of the most studied autophagy related protein family LC3/GABARAP commonly presumed to have similar functions, but there are evidence pointing to unique role of different proteins in this family in autophagy-dependent as well as autophagy-independent mechanisms57.
The analysis of autophagy related genes expression (Fig. 6) as well as conversion of LC3I to LC3II form (Supplementary Fig. 2) showed that GABA-containing and GABA-free supernatants significantly induced autophagy in stimulated MLNC, and GABA containing supernatants had the most prominent effects. The immunoregulatory effects of these supernatants correlated with the induction of autophagy, which is in accordance with many results pointing to a strong relation between autophagy related genes and immune regulation/homeostasis. In that sense, the beneficial role of ULK-1 protein kinase dependent autophagy has been proven for the infective and non-infective inflammatory injuries58,59. Similarly, the association between some inflammatory pathologies and deregulation of autophagy was been documented previously. Namely, Luo et al. showed that mRNA levels of Becn1 were downregulated in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and that the downregulation of Becn1 significantly increased the incidence of nephritis60. Globular adiponectin, which possesses potent anti-inflammatory properties, inhibited LPS-stimulated inflammatory cytokines expression, at least in part, via p62 induction and autophagy activation in RAW2647 macrophages and mouse peritoneal macrophages61. Importantly, autophagy is actively implicated in the maintenance of stability and survival of regulatory T cells (Treg)34. Deletion of ATG5 in Treg, leads to a loss of Treg and development of inflammatory disorders. The mice with loss of ATG5 showed a disrupted immune homeostasis of CD4+ and CD8+ cells that was associated with an increased IFN-γ expression.
As we have shown that GABA-containing and GABA-free supernatants induce autophagy, and that those containing GABA have more pronounced effects, we further tested if there are any differences between the effects of these supernatants on LC3 homolog, GABARAP. Interestingly, only the supernatants containing GABA (MRS/MSG and MRS/art. GABA) significantly stimulated the expression of GABARAP (Fig. 6g) in comparison to non-treated cells and the supernatants without GABA (MRS) (Fig. 6g). The exclusive stimulatory effects on GABARAP and stronger stimulatory effect of GABA containing supernatants on all other autophagy genes, correlated with the stronger immunoregulatory effects of these supernatants. These results suggested that GABA triggered signalling towards activation of GABARAP have an important role in autophagy-related immunoregulatory effects of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants. These results are in accordance with the findings of Salah et al. showing the potential role of GABARAP in tumorigeneses. Namely, these authors showed that the tumor-imposed suppression of immune response in tumor, such as the secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-2 and IFN-γ by macrophages and lymphocytes62 depends on GABARAP activity. Additionally, these authors showed that the levels of TGF-β1 are significantly reduced in the serum of GABARAP KO mice.
Immunoregulatory effects induced by GABA-contained in Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatant depend on ATG5-mediated induction of autophagy
In order to further investigate the role of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants-induced autophagy in its immunomodulatory effects, the autophagy was inhibited by the treatment of MLNC with ATG5 gene silencing using siRNA technology. MLNC were treated with ATG5 siRNA or scrambled siRNA (control), and the effects on metabolic activity and immune functions were monitored after 24 h. It is important to notice that the immunoregulatory effects of all supernatants after 24 h (Figs. 4–7) were slightly weaker in comparison to the same treatment imposed for 72 h (Figs. 2 and 3c). The capacity of supernatants to induce the expression of ATG5, p62 and LC3, were lowered significantly upon siRNA ATG5 treatment, compared to corresponding control (Supplementary Fig. 5a–c). The treatment of MLNC with siRNA specific for ATG5 (si + ATG5) completely silenced the supernatants-induced ATG5 expression in MLNC after 24 h, so the levels of ATG5 expression were similar in siRNA ATG5-treated controls and the supernatants-treated MLNC. At the other hand, the expression of p62 and LC3 were almost completely inhibited in siRNA ATG5 treated control MLNC. A significant, although not complete downregulation of supernatants-stimulated p62 and LC3 expression was observed in si + ATG5 MLNC compared to scramble siRNA-treated MLNC (Supplementary Fig. 5). However, significant differences between the effects of GABA-containing supernatants (MRS/art. GABA and MRS/MSG) and GABA-free (MRS) supernatant were not detected in MLNC treated with siRNA-ATG5. These results suggested that the GABA-containing supernatants of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 induced autophagy in MLNC via ATG5. However, the up-regulation of p62 and LC3-II expression in MLNC treated with si + ATG5 suggested that other soluble molecules produced by L. brevis BGZLS10-17 during 48 h cultivation induce autophagy in an ATG5-independent manner.
Interestingly, when autophagy in MLNC was inhibited by si + ATG5 (Fig. 7), the inhibitory effects of supernatants on metabolic activity and ConA-induced production of IFN-γ and IL-17 were significantly lower (Fig. 7a–c). Additionally, there were no more significant differences between the effects of GABA-containing and GABA-free supernatants on the production of IFN-γ and IL-17. However, si + ATG5 MLNC treated with supernatants still produced lower levels of these proinflammatory cytokines compared to si + ATG5 control MLNC, suggesting that the inhibition of these proinflammatory was completely ATG5 dependent, whereas the inhibition imposed by GABA-free supernatants was predominantly ATG5 independent. On the other hand, the inhibition of autophagy with si + ATG5 in MLNC completely abolished the stimulatory effects of the supernatants on the expression of Foxp3, TGF-β and IL-10 in MLNC (Fig. 7d–f). However, the GABA-free supernatants seem to inhibit the proinflammatory response of MLNC independent of GABA, ATG5 and down-stream FoxP3, IL-10 and TGF-β. The inhibitory potential of GABA-free supernatants could be mediated by direct actions on tolerogenic APC, since we found that OX62+ DC, B cells and Mf treated with this supernatant expressed lower levels of pro-inflammatory molecules (MHCII and CD80) and higher levels of immunoregulatory molecules (CTLA-4 and SIRP-α). These effects could be mediated by autophagy-dependent pathway, as we found a low induction of autophagy in these cells upon GABA-free supernatant treatment. These effects on APC could have been induced in autophagy independent way, as well, so further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of action of GABA-free supernatants.
In conclusion, here we provided evidence that live-bacteria-cell-free GABA-containing and GABA-free supernatants produced by L. brevis BGZLS10-17 induces strong immunoregulatory effects on ConA-stimulated MLNC, and that GABA-containing supernatant have an additional immunoregulatory potential. Further, we showed that these additional effects of GABA are completely mediated by ATG5 dependent autophagy, but also that other soluble molecules produced by L. brevis BGZLS10-17 display immunomodulatory effects independent of ATG5.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strain
Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17, GABA-producing natural isolate from artisanal Zlatar cheese22 from the laboratory collection of the Laboratory for Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering (IMGGE), University of Belgrade, Serbia was used in this study. Strain L. brevis BGZLS10-17 was used to determine immunomodulatory effect, in vitro. The strain was grown 48 h at 37 °C anaerobically in de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and according to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis there was no GABA production22. To stimulate GABA production by L. brevis BGZLS10-17, MRS medium was supplemented with 0.6% of monosodium glutamate (MSG) (Acros organics, Morris Plains, NJ, United States) and the strain was cultivated likewise (this supernatant is annotated as MRS/MSG) as described in Sokovic Bajic et al.22. The concentration of GABA in MRS/MSG was measured by HPLC analysis. To investigate the role of GABA in MRS/MSG supernatant, supernatants from L. brevis BGZLS10-17 cultured during 48 h in MRS without MSG (MRS) and with addition of artificial GABA (Sigma) (MRS/art. GABA) in final concentration of 4 mM (the concentration of GABA in 2.5% MRS/MSG) were used as controls. All supernatants were filtered with 0.22 μm filters to be sure to have bacterial-cell free supernatants, neutralized (pH7) and kept at −20 °C.
GABA production analysis
As described in Sokovic Bajic et al.22 the L. brevis BGZLS10-17 strain was incubated in MRS medium supplemented with 0.6% of MSG (Acros organics). The cells were harvested by centrifugation (4500 × g for 15 min at 4 °C) and 1 ml of the supernatant was evaporated up to 200 μl and diluted 2-fold by 7% acetic acid. The samples were then centrifuged at 8100 × g for 15 min at room temperature. The obtained supernatants were used for HPLC analysis63. The aliquots of 100 μl [bacterial supernatants and GABA standard (Sigma)] were filtrated through 0.22 μm filters and derivatized to phenylthiocarbamyl-GABA64. The derivatized samples were dissolved in 200 μl of the initial mobile phase, solution A (138 mM sodium acetate, pH 6.3, 6% acetonitrile, 0.05% triethylamine). HPLC separation was performed on the instrument of Thermo scientific 3000 equipped with a Hypersil gold column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States 150 × 4.6, 5 μm). The elution solvent system comprised of solution A, solution B (acetonitrile) and solution C (water). The elution program is shown in Supplementary Table 1. The amount of GABA production was calculated from the standard curve.
Animals
Female dark agouty (DA) rats (inbred strain of rats, 8-10-week-old, weighing 200–250 g), used in the experiments were maintained in the animal facility of the Institute for biological research “Sinisa Stankovic”, Belgrade, Serbia. The rats were housed in the temperature-controlled room (22 ± 1 °C) with food and water available ad libitum under a 12 h light/dark cycle. Experiments were approved by the local ethics committee (Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, No. 03-1/15). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Isolation and treatment of mesenteric lymph node cells
Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) were isolated from DA rats and suspension of cells (MLNC) was prepared by mechanical disruption of MLN. The number of MLNC was determined by counting live cells after Tripan blue staining on light microscopy. MLNC (2.5 × 106) were cultivated in 0.5 ml RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco™) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco™), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Gibco™), in 24 well plate and were maintained during the treatment period at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. MLNC were stimulated with concanavalin A (ConA, Sigma-Aldrich, 2.5 µg/ml) and treated for 24 or 72 h with fresh MRS, GABA-free and GABA-containing L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants in concentrations of 0.625%, 1.25%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10%. These concentrations of GABA-containing supernatants (MRS/MSG and MRS/art. GABA) contained 1 mM, 2 mM, 4 mM, 8 mM, and 16 mM GABA respectively, as determined by HPLC. To analyze the autophagic flux, the cells were exposed to lysosomotropic agent chloroquine (CQ) (Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 25 μM simultaneously with treatments19. After 24 or 72 h of incubation, the cells and cell culture supernatants were collected and subjected to following analyses.
Lactate dehydrogenase assay
The level of cytotoxicity in the cell cultures after 24 and 72 h was measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) which detects LDH released from dead cells, as described in Sokovic Bajic et al.22. After treatments, supernatants were collected and LDH activity was determined by following the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm on a microplate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria).
Measurement of metabolic activity of mesenteric lymph node cells
As described previously by Mosmann65, the effect of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 SN on metabolic activity of MLNC cultured for 24–72 h was examined by MTT assay [3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] (Serva, Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). After the treatment, the MTT dissolved in Phenol Red-Free RPMI media was added at the final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml. After 4 h of incubation, at 37 °C with 5% CO2 10% SDS-0.01 N HCl was added to dissolve formazan. The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader (Tecan) at a wavelength of 570 nm with references wavelength at 640 nm. The results are presented as the percentage of metabolic activity of treated cells compared to the control (100%).
Measurement of proliferation of mesenteric lymph node cells
In order to analyse the effect of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatant on polyclonal proliferation of MLNC, the cells were labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE, 1 µM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol, and then treated with Concanavalin A (2.5ug/ml, Sigma) either in the presence or absence of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants. The proliferation of CFSE-labeled MLNC was analyzed within live cells, as determined by simultaneous staining with propidium iodide (PI, Sigma, 10ug/ml) after the cultures, by flow cytometry according to Tomić et al.66. The percentage of proliferation was calculated using the proliferation fit statistics in FCS Express 4 software (De Novo Software, Glendale, CA, USA). The relative proliferation in suppression assays was calculated as the percentage of proliferation relative to control (100%).
Quantification of cytokines
Cytokines concentration in 24 and 72 h cell culture supernatants was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For interleukin (IL)-10 and interferon (IFN)-γ detection, specific DuoSet ELISA were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). For IL-17A detection, rat IL-17A (homodimer) ELISA Ready-SET-Go was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples were analyzed in duplicates and the results were calculated using the standard curves.
Quantitative real-time PCR
To analyze the level of mRNA for different functional molecules total RNA was extracted from MLNC collected from 24 h cultures as previously described in Sokovic Bajic et al.22. Denaturing solution (4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 25 mM sodium citrate, 0.1 M b-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% [wt/vol] N-lauroylsarcosinate sodium salt) was used for cell lysis followed by acid phenol (pH 4) extractions and isopropanol precipitation. 200 ng of total RNA was used for generation of cDNA according to the reverse transcriptase manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Scientific). Quantitative PCR was realized in 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems,Wilmington, MA, USA) under the following conditions: 3 min at 95 °C activation, 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95 °C and 60 sec at 60 °C. The primers used (Table 1) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
Table 1.
Primer name | Primer sequence 5′-3′ | Reference |
---|---|---|
β-actin forward β-actin reverse |
AGCCATGTACGTAGCCATCC CTCTCAGCTGTGGTGGTGAA |
67 |
TGF-β forward TGF-β reverse |
GCTGAACCAAGGAGACGGAATA ACCTCGACGTTTGGGACTGA |
This work |
FoxP3 forward FoxP3 reverse |
CCCAGGAAAGACAGCAACCTT CTGCTTGGCAGTGCTTGAGAA |
68 |
ULK 1 forward ULK1 reverse |
CTCCCCAAGTGGGAACCATC GGGACGAACGACATGGAAGT |
This work |
UVRAG forward UVRAG reverse |
CTGTACACCTGACTCCCACG GGGGCTCTCCTGTTACAAGT |
This work |
Becn1 forward Becn 1 reverse |
CAATACCAGAATCCACAAAAGC AGGGAAGAGGGAAAGGACAG |
Personal communication |
ATG 5 forward ATG 5 reverse |
CGGTGCAAGGATGCAGTTGAG TTCTGCAGTCCCATCCAGAG |
This work |
LC3 forward LC3 reverse |
GACTTCCGGAAAGCTCTGCT ACCAGCATCGTAGAGGGTCT |
69 |
GABARAP forward GABARAP reverse |
AAAGCTCGGATAGGGGACCT CACTGGTGGGTCGAATGACA |
This work |
p62 forward P62 reverse |
TCCCTGTCAAGCAGTATCC TCCTCCTTGGCTTTGTCTC |
69 |
Western blot
Proteins for detection of LC3I/LC3II level were isolated from MLNC collected from 24 h cultures using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer and subsequently subjected to Western blot analysis as described by Dinić et al.19. Briefly, the extracted proteins (10 μg) were separated on 12% SDS–PAGE and transferred to 0.2 mm nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, United States) using Bio-Rad Mini trans-blot system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-LC3 (1:2000; Thermo Fischer Scientific) and anti-β-actin (1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The membranes were washed and incubated with appropriate HPR-conjugated secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit; 1:10000; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Immobilon Western, Merck Millipore). The intensity of the bands was quantified using ImageJ software as described previously in Sokovic Bajic et al.22.
RNA interference
MLNC were washed twice in OptiMEM medium (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA), and seeded in 24-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well) in OptiMEM medium. MLNC were then transfected with scrambled small interfering RNA (siRNA) control, or siRNA targeting rat ATG5 (Ambion, Applied Biosystems), using Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 8 h, an equal volume of complete RPMI medium was added for the next 16 h, and the transfected MLNC were treated with L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants during next 24 h and used in assays according to Tomić et al.47.
Flow cytometry
The effects of L. brevis BGZLS10-17 supernatants on LC3 flux within MLNC was analyzed in MLNC collected after 72 h cultures pre-treated with CQ, by flow cytometry. The expression of functional molecules on selected immune cells was carried out on similar cultures that were not treated with CQ. After the cultures, MLNC were washed twice in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) containing 0.1% NaN3 and 2% FCS and surface stained with the following, directly conjugated mouse-anti-rat monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): CD3 Alexa Fluor 647 (clone: 1F4), CD11b Alexa Fluor 647 (OX-42), CD4 phycoerythrin (PE) (W3/25), MHC class II RT1B (OX-6) PE, CD68 (ED1) Alexa 647, isotype control rat IgG biotin, isotype control IgG Alexa 647 (Bio-Rad), CD161 biotin (10/78), alpha E2 integrin (OX-62) biotin (R&D Systems), CD80 PE (3H5), CD45R B220 FITC (HIS 24), isotype control rat IgG pe (BD Biosciences), CD152 CTLA-4 (14D3) biotin, CD172a SIRP-α (P84) biotin, isotype control Rat IgG FITC (ThermoFisher Scientific). After the staining with biotin labeled mAbs, the cells were washed and incubated for 15 minutes with streptavidin PEcy7 (Biolegend) and then washed with PBS/NaN3. The surface staining was followed by fixation and permeabilization using BD fixation/permeabilization kit, according to manufacturer’s protocol. Intracellular staining of LC3 was carried out in permeabilization buffer using rabbit anti-rat LC3 Ab, followed by goat-anti-rabbit IgG Alexa 647 or goat-anti-rabbit IgG Alexa 488 (ThermoFisher Scientific). Due to permeabilization, this method preferentially detects membrane bond LC3II, over cytosolic LC3I31 and the sensitivity is increased by labeling with secondary Abs. The cells were gated according to their size and granularity upon exclusion of doublets, and the compensation overflow was determined using single stained samples. Non-specific fluorescence was detected according to isotype control mAbs, fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls, or in the case of LC3 detection, omission of the primary Ab.
Statistical analysis
All data, except graphs presenting FACS analysis, are presented as mean values ± standard error of the mean. One-way ANOVA with the Dunnett’s test was used to compare multiple groups. The differences between control and experimental groups were compared using Student’s t-test. Values at p < 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. All experiments were repeated at least three times. The graphs presenting FACS analysis are representatives from two experiments. Statistical analysis and graph design were carried out using GraphPad Prism Software.
Ethical approval
Experiments were approved by the local ethics committee (Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, No. 03-1/15). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by The Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of The Republic of Serbia (project No. 173019; project No. 173050; project No. 175102). The authors thank Dr. Jovanka Lukić (IMGGE) for providing primers for Becn 1.
Author contributions
S.S.B., J.Đ. and M.D. designed the study, performed the experiments, interpreted the data, prepared figures and wrote the manuscript. S.T. designed, performed and interpreted the FACS analysis and wrote the manuscript. N.P. performed all experiment with the animals used. E.B. performed qPCR. M.T. and N.G. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-58177-2.
References
- 1.Wang L, Wang F-S, Gershwin ME. Human autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive update. J. Intern. Med. 2015;278:369–395. doi: 10.1111/joim.12395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hill C, et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aguilar-Toalá JE, et al. Postbiotics: An evolving term within the functional foods field. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;75:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mazzoli, R. & Pessione, E. The Neuro-endocrinological Role of Microbial Glutamate and GABA Signaling. Front. Microbiol. 7 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Bhat R, et al. Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010;107:2580–2585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915139107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tian J, Yong J, Dang H, Kaufman DL. Oral GABA treatment downregulates inflammatory responses in a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity. 2011;44:465–470. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2011.571223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tian J, et al. Oral Treatment with γ-Aminobutyric Acid Improves Glucose Tolerance and Insulin Sensitivity by Inhibiting Inflammation in High Fat Diet-Fed Mice. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tian J, Dang H, Kaufman DL. Combining Antigen-Based Therapy with GABA Treatment Synergistically Prolongs Survival of Transplanted ß-Cells in Diabetic NOD Mice. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang J, Mei L-H, Xia J. Application of artificial neural network coupling particle swarm optimization algorithm to biocatalytic production of GABA. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007;96:924–931. doi: 10.1002/bit.21162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cho YR, Chang JY, Chang HC. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus buchneri isolated from kimchi and its neuroprotective effect on neuronal cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;17:104–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Herman Lieve, Chemaly Marianne, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Fernandez Pablo, Klein Günter, Peixe Luisa, Prieto Miguel, Querol Amparo, Suarez Juan Evaristo, Sundh Ingvar, Vlak Just, Correia Sandra. The qualified presumption of safety assessment and its role in EFSA risk evaluations: 15 years past. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2018;366(Supplement_1):i17–i23. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ. Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008;72:728–764. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00017-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kuballa P, Nolte WM, Castoreno AB, Xavier RJ. Autophagy and the Immune System. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012;30:611–646. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Qian M, Fang X, Wang X. Autophagy and inflammation. Clin. Transl. Med. 2017;6:24. doi: 10.1186/s40169-017-0154-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou X-J, Zhang H. Autophagy in immunity: Implications in etiology of autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases. Autophagy. 2012;8:1286–1299. doi: 10.4161/auto.21212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ye X, Zhou X-J, Zhang H. Exploring the Role of Autophagy-Related Gene 5 (ATG5) Yields Important Insights Into Autophagy in Autoimmune/Autoinflammatory Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2334. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim JK, et al. GABAergic signaling linked to autophagy enhances host protection against intracellular bacterial infections. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06487-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dinić, M. et al. Lactobacillus fermentum Postbiotic-induced Autophagy as Potential Approach for Treatment of Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity. Front. Microbiol. 8 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Wu S, et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG mono-association suppresses human rotavirus-induced autophagy in the gnotobiotic piglet intestine. Gut Pathog. 2013;5:22. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Motevaseli, E. et al. The Effect of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus Culture Supernatants on Expression of Autophagy Genes and HPV E6 and E7 Oncogenes in The HeLa Cell Line. Cell J Yakhteh17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Sokovic Bajic S, et al. GABA-Producing Natural Dairy Isolate From Artisanal Zlatar Cheese Attenuates Gut Inflammation and Strengthens Gut Epithelial Barrier in vitro. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:527. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu Q, Law Y-S, Shah NP. Dairy Streptococcus thermophilus improves cell viability of Lactobacillus brevis NPS-QW-145 and its γ-aminobutyric acid biosynthesis ability in milk. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12885. doi: 10.1038/srep12885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Engevik, M. A. et al. Bifidobacterium dentium Fortifies the Intestinal Mucus Layer via Autophagy and Calcium Signaling Pathways. mBio10, e01087-19, /mbio/10/3/mBio.01087-19.atom (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Tsilingiri K, Rescigno M. Postbiotics: what else? Benef. Microbes. 2013;4:101–107. doi: 10.3920/BM2012.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jin Z, Mendu SK, Birnir B. GABA is an effective immunomodulatory molecule. Amino Acids. 2013;45:87–94. doi: 10.1007/s00726-011-1193-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sokovic Bajic, S. et al. Characterization of pH resistance and the proteolytic activity of GABA producing Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 in preparation of fermented milk beverage and the effects on the symptoms of the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Serbian Chem. Soc. 94–94, 10.2298/JSC190716094S (2019).
- 28.Kern DE, Lachmann LB, Greenberg PD. Lyt-2+ cells. Requirements for concanavalin A-induced proliferation and interleukin 2 production. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950. 1987;139:2880–2887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsilingiri K, et al. Probiotic and postbiotic activity in health and disease: comparison on a novel polarised ex-vivo organ culture model. Gut. 2012;61:1007–1015. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yan F, et al. Colon-specific delivery of a probiotic-derived soluble protein ameliorates intestinal inflammation in mice through an EGFR-dependent mechanism. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:2242–2253. doi: 10.1172/JCI44031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.von Schillde M-A, et al. Lactocepin Secreted By Lactobacillus Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects By Selectively Degrading Proinflammatory Chemokines. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11:387–396. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kuwabara T, Ishikawa F, Kondo M, Kakiuchi T. The Role of IL-17 and Related Cytokines in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2017/3908061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dominguez-Villar M, Hafler DA. Regulatory T cells in autoimmune disease. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19:665–673. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0120-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wei J, et al. Autophagy enforces functional integrity of regulatory T cells by coupling environmental cues and metabolic homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:277–285. doi: 10.1038/ni.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jiang P, Mizushima N. Autophagy and human diseases. Cell Res. 2014;24:69–79. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arbogast F, Gros F. Lymphocyte Autophagy in Homeostasis, Activation, and Inflammatory Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1801. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Warnes G. Measurement of Autophagy by Flow Cytometry. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. 2014;68:9.45.1–9.45.10. doi: 10.1002/0471142956.cy0945s68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fergusson, J. R., Fleming, V. M. & Klenerman, P. CD161-Expressing Human T Cells. Front. Immunol. 2 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Jin W, Dong C. IL-17 cytokines in immunity and inflammation. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2013;2:1–5. doi: 10.1038/emi.2013.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schoenborn, J. R. & Wilson, C. B. Regulation of Interferon‐γ During Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses. In Advances in Immunology vol. 96, 41–101 (Elsevier, 2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Liu G, Bi Y, Wang R, Wang X. Self-eating and self-defense: autophagy controls innate immunity and adaptive immunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013;93:511–519. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0812389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sanjabi S, Zenewicz LA, Kamanaka M, Flavell RA. Anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory roles of TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-22 in immunity and autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2009;9:447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gregori S. Dendritic cells in networks of immunological tolerance. Tissue Antigens. 2011;77:89–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2010.01615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Akbari O, DeKruyff RH, Umetsu DT. Pulmonary dendritic cells producing IL-10 mediate tolerance induced by respiratory exposure to antigen. Nat. Immunol. 2001;2:725–731. doi: 10.1038/90667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Esebanmen GE, Langridge WHR. The role of TGF-beta signaling in dendritic cell tolerance. Immunol. Res. 2017;65:987–994. doi: 10.1007/s12026-017-8944-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dengjel J, et al. Autophagy promotes MHC class II presentation of peptides from intracellular source proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005;102:7922–7927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501190102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tomić S, et al. Graphene quantum dots suppress proinflammatory T cell responses via autophagy-dependent induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells. Biomaterials. 2017;146:13–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hubo, M. et al. Costimulatory Molecules on Immunogenic Versus Tolerogenic Human Dendritic Cells. Front. Immunol. 4 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Sage PT, Paterson AM, Lovitch SB, Sharpe AH. The Coinhibitory Receptor CTLA-4 Controls B Cell Responses by Modulating T Follicular Helper, T Follicular Regulatory, and T Regulatory Cells. Immunity. 2014;41:1026–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kato H, Perl A. Blockade of Treg Cell Differentiation and Function by the Interleukin-21-Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Axis Via Suppression of Autophagy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:427–438. doi: 10.1002/art.40380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weiskopf K. Cancer immunotherapy targeting the CD47/SIRPα axis. Eur. J. Cancer. 2017;76:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang X, et al. Inhibition of autophagy potentiated the anti-tumor effects of VEGF and CD47 bispecific therapy in glioblastoma. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;102:6503–6513. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9069-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Mammalian autophagy: core molecular machinery and signaling regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010;22:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schaaf MBE, et al. The autophagy associated gene, ULK1, promotes tolerance to chronic and acute hypoxia. Radiother. Oncol. 2013;108:529–534. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Axe EL, et al. Autophagosome formation from membrane compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 2008;182:685–701. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200803137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liang C, Feng P, Ku B, Oh B-H, Jung JU. UVRAG: A New Player in Autophagy and Tumor Cell Growth. Autophagy. 2007;3:69–71. doi: 10.4161/auto.3437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schaaf MBE, Keulers TG, Vooijs MA, Rouschop KMA. LC3/GABARAP family proteins: autophagy-(un)related functions. FASEB J. 2016;30:3961–3978. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600698R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fan K, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Dephosphorylation of AMPK-Activated Protein Kinase Potentiates Inflammatory Injury via Repression of ULK1-Dependent Autophagy. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1464. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kemp MG, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Sancar A. UV Light Potentiates STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes)-dependent Innate Immune Signaling through Deregulation of ULK1 (Unc51-like Kinase 1) J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:12184–12194. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.649301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Luo XY. Decreased expression of BECN1 mRNA is associated with lupus nephritis. Biomedical Research-India. 2017;28:2952–2956. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kim MJ, et al. Globular Adiponectin Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Primed Inflammasomes Activation in Macrophages via Autophagy Induction: The Critical Role of AMPK Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1275. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Salah FS, et al. Tumor suppression in mice lacking GABARAP, an Atg8/LC3 family member implicated in autophagy, is associated with alterations in cytokine secretion and cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2205–e2205. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Holdiness MR. Chromatographic analysis of glutamic acid decarboxylase in biological samples. J. Chromatogr. 1983;277:1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)84819-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rossetti V, Lombard A. Determination of glutamate decarboxylase by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Appl. 1996;681:63–67. doi: 10.1016/0378-4347(96)88202-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods. 1983;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tomić S, et al. Prostaglanin-E2 Potentiates the Suppressive Functions of Human Mononuclear Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Increases Their Capacity to Expand IL-10-Producing Regulatory T Cell Subsets. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:475. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mousavi SA, Fønhus MS, Berg T. Up-regulation of uPARAP/Endo180 during culture activation of rat hepatic stellate cells and its presence in hepatic stellate cell lines from different species. BMC Cell Biol. 2009;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-10-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hillebrands J-L, et al. A Regulatory CD4+ T Cell Subset in the BB Rat Model of Autoimmune Diabetes Expresses Neither CD25 Nor Foxp3. J. Immunol. 2006;177:7820–7832. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.7820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen Z, et al. Enhanced p62 expression triggers concomitant autophagy and apoptosis in a rat chronic spinal cord compression model. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014;9:2091–2096. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.