Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2020 Jan 28;58(2):e01377-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01377-19

Blood-Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method: a Phenotypic Method for Detecting Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Directly from Positive Blood Culture Broths

M M Sfeir a, M J Satlin a, K A Fauntleroy b, S G Jenkins a,c, L F Westblade a,c,
Editor: Nathan A Ledeboerd
PMCID: PMC6989087  PMID: 31748319

A variant of the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was developed to detect carbapenemase activity directly from positive blood culture broths. The method, termed “Blood-mCIM,” was evaluated using Bactec blood culture bottles (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) inoculated with 27 different carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates and 34 different non-CPE isolates.

KEYWORDS: blood culture, bloodstream infection, carbapenemase, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), blood-modified carbapenem inactivation method (Blood-mCIM), phenotypic detection

ABSTRACT

A variant of the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was developed to detect carbapenemase activity directly from positive blood culture broths. The method, termed “Blood-mCIM,” was evaluated using Bactec blood culture bottles (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) inoculated with 27 different carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates and 34 different non-CPE isolates. The assay was positive for all blood culture broths inoculated with CPE isolates and negative for all blood culture broths inoculated with non-CPE isolates, corresponding to a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%, respectively. This assay is inexpensive using “off the shelf” reagents, does not require centrifugation or mechanical lysis, and can be readily implemented in any clinical microbiology laboratory. The Blood-mCIM should facilitate expedient administration of antimicrobial therapy targeted toward CPE bloodstream infections and assist infection control and public health surveillance.

INTRODUCTION

Resistance to the carbapenems, potent broad-spectrum β-lactams, is one of the most concerning forms of antimicrobial resistance in members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Phenotypic resistance to carbapenems is often conferred by carbapenemases, enzymes that hydrolyze the carbapenem β-lactam ring (1). Bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are accompanied by less favorable outcomes compared to non-carbapenemase-producing-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (2). Further, delayed treatment with effective antimicrobial agents in patients with septic shock is associated with a decrease in survival for every hour that therapy is delayed (3). Therefore, accurate and expedient methods to detect carbapenemase activity directly from positive blood culture broths are important for assisting physicians with antimicrobial therapy selection to treat bloodstream infections due to these organisms (4, 5).

Genotypic and immunologic assays for detecting carbapenemase-producing organisms directly from positive blood culture broths are described (68). These tests exhibit excellent diagnostic characteristics but their high cost often precludes their use in resource-limited settings. Additionally, they detect specific carbapenemase genes or proteins, and thus would not detect the emergence of new or previously uncommon carbapenemases. Phenotypic methods that detect carbapenemase activity are not limited thus, and have been employed for the detection of carbapenemase activity in isolates recovered in culture (915). However, many of these assays have not been evaluated on positive blood culture broths, which are available for testing before the offending organism is recovered in culture on solid media.

This present study describes the appropriation of one such phenotypic assay, the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), to generate the Blood-mCIM that allows detection of CPE directly from positive blood culture broths through detection of carbapenemase activity. Results are available between 22 to 28 h after the blood culture broth signals positive, and at least a day earlier than conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates.

A collection of 61 Enterobacteriaceae isolates (Table S1 in the supplemental material) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the United States Food and Drug Administration Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank (ARB; https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/resistance-bank/index.html) was analyzed in this study. The collection contained 34 non-CPE isolates as follows: Escherichia coli (n = 12), Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 5), Klebsiella aerogenes (formerly Enterobacter aerogenes) (n = 4), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 1), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 11), and Proteus mirabilis (n = 1). These isolates harbored a wide range of β-lactamases, cell wall permeability defects (such as truncated porins), or a combination of both. The meropenem MIC values of these non-CPE isolates were determined using broth microdilution and ranged from ≤0.12 μg/ml to >8 μg/ml, with 23/34 (67.7%) testing susceptible (meropenem MIC value, ≤1 μg/ml), 3/34 (8.8%) testing intermediate (meropenem MIC value, 2 μg/ml), and 8/34 (23.5%) testing resistant (meropenem MIC value, ≥4 μg/ml) according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints (16). Twenty-seven isolates were CPE (Table 1). The meropenem MIC values of these CPE isolates were also determined using broth microdilution and ranged from 1 μg/ml to >8 μg/ml, with 2/27 (7.4%) testing susceptible, 3/27 (11.1%) testing intermediate, and 22/27 (81.5%) testing resistant according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints (16).

TABLE 1.

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae analyzed in this study

Clinical organism Carbapenemase typea
Ambler class A
Ambler class B
Ambler class D
NMC-A KPC SME IMP NDM VIM OXA-48-type
Citrobacter freundii NA 1 NA NA 1 NA NA
Enterobacter cloacae complex 1 2 NA NA NA 1 NA
Escherichia coli NA 2 NA NA 2 NA NA
Klebsiella aerogenes (formerly Enterobacter aerogenes) NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
Klebsiella ozaenae NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
Klebsiella pneumoniae NA NA NA 1 NA 1 4
Morganella morganii NA 1 NA NA 1 NA NA
Proteus mirabilis NA 1 NA NA 1 NA NA
Providencia rettgeri NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA
Raoultella ornithinolytica NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA
Salmonella enterica serovar Senftenberg NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA
Serratia marcescens NA NA 2 NA NA NA NA
Total 1 8 2 1 7 2 6
a

IMP, imipenemase; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; NA, not applicable; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; NMC-A, nonmetallocarbapenemase-A; OXA, oxacillinase; SME, Serratia marcescens enzyme; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase.

Blood-mCIM.

Prior to performing the Blood-mCIM, ARB bacterial isolates stored at −80°C were cultured onto tryptic soy agar with sheep blood (TSAB; Becton, Dickinson and Company [BD], Franklin Lakes, NJ) and incubated in 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) at 35°C for 18 to 24 h to generate F1 cultures. The F1 cultures were subcultured onto TSAB and again incubated in 5% CO2 at 35°C for 18 to 24 h to generate F2 cultures. These F2 cultures were used to generate a suspension of organism in sterile saline (MicroScan Inoculum Saline, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard. The bacterial suspension was serially diluted in sterile saline and ∼1,500 CFU/ml injected into a BD Bactec blood culture bottle (inoculated with human blood) that was negative for growth after 5 days of incubation in the BD Bactec FX blood culture system. The contrived blood culture bottles were returned to the blood culture system. Throughout the study a range of blood culture media were inoculated with test isolates as follows: BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, 33 bottles; BD Bactec Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F, 23 bottles; and BD Bactec Peds Plus/F, five bottles.

Upon signaling positive, the blood culture bottle was vented using a subculturing/aerobic venting unit (BD) and four drops of the positive blood culture broth was added to 2 ml of tryptic soy broth (TSB) (BD) in a plastic assay tube and the mixture was vortexed briefly. A meropenem disk (10 μg) (BD) was added and fully immersed in the TSB/blood culture broth mixture. The tubes were incubated at 35˚C in ambient air without agitation for 4 h ± 15 min. Subsequently, the meropenem disks were removed using a 10 μl inoculation loop and applied to Mueller-Hinton agar plates (BD) freshly inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland suspension of a carbapenem-susceptible reporter strain (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922). The plates were incubated in ambient air at 35˚C for 18 to 24 h. Results were interpreted as described by Pierce and colleagues for the mCIM, and as presented in the Clinical and Laboratory Institute M100 document (12, 16). The mCIM is considered negative (i.e., the test isolate does not produce a carbapenemase) if the E. coli ATCC 25922 zone size is ≥19 mm. In contrast, the mCIM is reported positive (i.e., the test isolate does produce a carbapenemase) if the E. coli ATCC 25922 zone size is 6 to 15 mm or pinpoint colonies are present within a 16 to 18 mm zone (for an example of pinpoint colonies, see Fig. 2 in reference 12). Finally, the mCIM result is considered indeterminate if the E. coli ATCC 25922 zone size is either 16 to 18 mm, ≥19 mm with pinpoint colonies present within the zone, or the absence or presence of a carbapenemase cannot be confirmed. All positive blood culture broths were subcultured to determine purity.

On each day of testing, a negative control (K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603, which expresses a SHV-18 enzyme) and a positive control (K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705, which expresses a Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase [KPC]) were prepared as described above and injected into a range of BD Bactec bottles (BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, 15 bottles; BD Bactec Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F, 13 bottles; and BD Bactec Peds Plus/F, six bottles) inoculated with human blood that were negative for growth after 5 days of incubation. Upon signaling positive, the positive blood culture broths were assayed as described above for the test isolates and results were interpreted as described above.

Data analysis.

The reference method was genotypic detection of carbapenemase genes by whole-genome sequencing. A true positive result was defined as a positive Blood-mCIM result in the presence of any carbapenemase gene. A true negative result was defined as a negative Blood-mCIM result in the absence of any carbapenemase gene. A false-positive result was defined as a positive Blood-mCIM result in the absence of any carbapenemase gene, and a false-negative result was defined as a negative Blood-mCIM result in the presence of any carbapenemase gene. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, and associated confidence intervals, were calculated using an internet-based calculator (https://www.medcalc.org).

RESULTS

Performance of Blood-mCIM.

To determine the diagnostic performance of Blood-mCIM, we assayed a collection of 61 Enterobacteriaceae comprising 27 CPE isolates (11 class A enzymes, 10 class B, and 6 class D; Table 1) and 34 non-CPE isolates (Table S1 in the supplemental material). The Blood-mCIM test was positive for all 27 CPE isolates and was negative for all 34 non-CPE isolates, corresponding to a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.2% to 100%) and diagnostic specificity of 100% (95% CI, 89.7% to 100%). The zone sizes for the E. coli ATCC 25922 reporter strain were between 22 and 24 mm with an arithmetic mean of 22.9 mm (standard deviation of the mean [SD], 0.3 mm) for all non-CPE, and 6 mm (i.e., the E. coli ATCC 25922 reporter strain grew up to the edge of the meropenem disk) for all CPE.

Reproducibility of quality control testing.

Quality control testing was performed each day of testing on a total of 17 different days. When examining the meropenem zone sizes of the E. coli ATCC 25922 reporter strain for the negative control (K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603), the range in zone sizes was between 19 and 23 mm with an arithmetic mean of 22.2 mm (SD, 1 mm), and 6 mm for all positive-control (K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705) tests. These data support the use of these isolates as quality control isolates for the Blood-mCIM.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we describe the diagnostic performance of the Blood-mCIM, a variant of the mCIM, which permits the phenotypic detection of CPE directly from positive blood culture broths. The assay has a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%, respectively, and quality control testing was highly reproducible. When taking into account the 18 to 24 h of incubation time required to evaluate the meropenem zone sizes, results can be obtained between 22 to 28 h after the blood culture signals positive. The test requires inexpensive “off the shelf” materials that are accessible to all clinical microbiology laboratories, including those in austere settings. Importantly, upon signaling positive, the Blood-mCIM does not require processing of the blood culture using centrifugation or mechanical lysis methodology, therefore simplifying its implementation and use.

Notwithstanding the favorable performance of the Blood-mCIM, our study has limitations. First, only contrived blood culture broths were assessed, although this appears to be a limitation of most studies assessing the performance of phenotypic methods for detecting carbapenemase activity directly from positive blood culture broths (17, 18). Second, we only assessed this method using a single blood culture system at one center. Again, this appears to be a limitation of previous studies (17, 18). Finally, an 18 to 24 h of incubation step is required to evaluate meropenem zone sizes. However, Caméléna and colleagues showed using the CIM that carbapenemase-producing isolates could be detected 8 h after setting up the assay (i.e., 2 h of incubation time for the CIM followed by evaluation of the meropenem zone sizes after 6 h of incubation on inoculated Mueller-Hinton agar plates). Therefore, it is conceivable that the Blood-mCIM could be evaluated in a similar time frame and additional investigations using shorter incubation times are warranted.

Several phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenemase-producing isolates directly from positive blood culture broths have been reported. These include modifications of the Carba NP, β-CARBA, CIM, and NeoRapid CARB tests (17, 18). The reported diagnostic sensitivity of these assays varied between 97.9 and 100%, and the diagnostic specificity between 91.4 and 100%. However, these methods (with the exception of the bcCIM, which is a variant of the CIM used to detect CPE directly from blood culture broths) (18) require additional processing such as centrifugation or mechanical lysis, which may be prohibitive in some settings, and all of the aforementioned methods, including bcCIM, require supplementary reagents such as sodium chloride, sodium dodecyl sulfate, or zinc sulfate. This is in contrast to the Blood-mCIM, which requires neither additional processing nor reagents.

To improve the detection of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) using the bcCIM, supplementation with zinc sulfate was necessary (18). This is in contrast to our findings, where Blood-mCIM readily detected all MBLs without the need for zinc ion supplementation. Nonetheless, it is important to note that our study included a relatively small number of MBLs (n = 10) compared to the number of MBLs assayed using the bcCIM (n = 50). The apparent requirement for zinc sulfate implies that, unlike the Blood-mCIM, the bcCIM and the Carba NP, which are dependent on zinc sulfate, cannot be further modified by the addition of metal chelating agents, such as EDTA, to allow differentiation between serine carbapenemases (class A and D enzymes, e.g., KPC and OXA-48-type) and MBLs (class B enzymes, e.g., IMP, NDM, VIM) as described for bacterial isolates recovered on solid media (1315).

In conclusion, we describe the characterization of the Blood-mCIM that permits the phenotypic detection of carbapenemase activity directly from positive blood culture broths. The assay displayed excellent diagnostic characteristics and was easy to perform and interpret, and only required equipment used in all clinical microbiology laboratories regardless of the setting. As part of a multicenter study, future studies will focus on determining the performance of the Blood-mCIM using patient-collected and contrived blood cultures incubated on a range of blood culture systems.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
JCM.01377-19-s0001.xlsx (16.7KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Isolates in this study were acquired from the CDC and FDA antibiotic resistance bank (https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/resistance-bank/index.html).

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Queenan AM, Bush K. 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:440–458. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tamma PD, Goodman KE, Harris AD, Tekle T, Roberts A, Taiwo A, Simner PJ. 2017. Comparing the outcomes of patients with carbapenemase-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 64:257–264. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, Suppes R, Feinstein D, Zanotti S, Taiberg L, Gurka D, Kumar A, Cheang M. 2006. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:1589–1596. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zarkotou O, Pournaras S, Tselioti P, Dragoumanos V, Pitiriga V, Ranellou K, Prekates A, Themeli-Digalaki K, Tsakris A. 2011. Predictors of mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and impact of appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:1798–1803. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Viale P, Giannella M, Lewis R, Trecarichi EM, Petrosillo N, Tumbarello M. 2013. Predictors of mortality in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 11:1053–1063. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2013.836057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ledeboer NA, Lopansri BK, Dhiman N, Cavagnolo R, Carroll KC, Granato P, Thomson R Jr, Butler-Wu SM, Berger H, Samuel L, Pancholi P, Swyers L, Hansen GT, Tran NK, Polage CR, Thomson KS, Hanson ND, Winegar R, Buchan BW. 2015. Identification of Gram-negative bacteria and genetic resistance determinants from positive blood culture broths by use of the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture multiplex microarray-based molecular assay. J Clin Microbiol 53:2460–2472. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00581-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Salimnia H, Fairfax MR, Lephart PR, Schreckenberger P, DesJarlais SM, Johnson JK, Robinson G, Carroll KC, Greer A, Morgan M, Chan R, Loeffelholz M, Valencia-Shelton F, Jenkins S, Schuetz AN, Daly JA, Barney T, Hemmert A, Kanack KJ. 2016. Evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel: results of a multicenter controlled trial. J Clin Microbiol 54:687–698. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01679-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takissian J, Bonnin RA, Naas T, Dortet L. 2019. NG-Test Carba 5 for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales from positive blood cultures. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00011-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00011-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hrabák J, Walková R, Studentová V, Chudácková E, Bergerová T. 2011. Carbapenemase activity detection by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 49:3222–3227. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00984-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nordmann P, Poirel L, Dortet L. 2012. Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1503–1507. doi: 10.3201/eid1809.120355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van der Zwaluw K, de Haan A, Pluister GN, Bootsma HJ, de Neeling AJ, Schouls LM. 2015. The carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba NP test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in gram-negative rods. PLoS One 10:e0123690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pierce VM, Simner PJ, Lonsway DR, Roe-Carpenter DE, Johnson JK, Brasso WB, Bobenchik AM, Lockett ZC, Charnot-Katsikas A, Ferraro MJ, Thomson RB Jr, Jenkins SG, Limbago BM, Das S. 2017. Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 55:2321–2333. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00193-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamada K, Kashiwa M, Arai K, Nagano N, Saito R. 2017. Evaluation of the modified carbapenem inactivation method and sodium mercaptoacetate-combination method for the detection of metallo-β-lactamase production by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Microbiol Methods 132:112–115. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caméléna F, Cointe A, Mathy V, Hobson C, Doit C, Bercot B, Decré D, Podglajen I, Dortet L, Monjault A, Bidet P, Bonacorsi S, Birgy A. 2018. Within-a-day detection and rapid characterization of carbapenemase by use of a new carbapenem inactivation method-based test, CIMplus. J Clin Microbiol 56:e00137-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00137-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sfeir MM, Hayden JA, Fauntleroy KA, Mazur C, Johnson JK, Simner PJ, Das S, Satlin MJ, Jenkins SG, Westblade LF. 2019. EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method: a phenotypic method for detecting metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 57:e01757-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01757-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2019. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 29th ed CLSI supplement M100 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dortet L, Bréchard L, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2014. Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:340–344. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meier M, Hamprecht A. 2019. Systematic comparison of four methods for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales directly from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 57:e00709-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00709-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
JCM.01377-19-s0001.xlsx (16.7KB, xlsx)

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES