The content is available as a PDF (96.0 KB).
Footnotes
This work was funded through NHRDP grant number 6606-5782-800.
References
- 1.Moore S, Wolfe SM, Lindes D, Douglas CE. Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation. JAMA. 1994;272(15):1171–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03520150039034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Glantz SA, Begay ME. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policy making in California. JAMA. 1994;272(15):1176–82. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03520150044035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cohen JE, Goldstein AD, Flynn BS, Gottlieb NH, Dana GS, Solomon LJ, Munger MC, Bauman KE. Legislators, Lobbyists, and Tobacco Control. 1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Presthus R. Aspects of political culture and legislative behavior: United States and Canada. Int J Comparative Sociol. 1977;18(1-2):7–22. doi: 10.1177/002071527701800102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stanbury WT. Money in Politics: Financing Federal Parties and Candidates in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Magleby D N CJ. The Money Chase: Congressional Campaign Finance Reform. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Selin H. Chair. Understanding and Countering the Tobacco Industry. 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cunningham R. Smoke & Mirrors: The Canadian Tobacco War. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Howard R. Globe & Mail. 1991. Tobacco industry loses lobbyist: Neville quits council; p. 8. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gray C. Financial Post Magazine. 1991. Ottawa’s insiders: Most insiders shun the limelight — but it pays to know who really counts and has real clout; pp. 30–42. [Google Scholar]