Abstract
The efficacy of alcohol or water in promoting umbilical cord separation was compared in a randomized controlled trial. Rates of skin colonization between groups were also evaluated on three occasions. Time to cord separation, rates of colonization, and species of organisms that colonized were compared between groups. Of 148 participants, 136 (92%) completed the protocol. Cords that were cleaned with sterile water separated more quickly than those cleaned with alcohol (t = 3.15, p = 0.002). Betweengroup differences in colonization rates were not found (F = 1.59, df = 2, p = 0.205). Umbilical or other infections did not occur. Bacterial colonization of the umbilical area and surrounding skin occurs over time in healthy term neonates. Cleaning with alcohol will increase the length of time from birth to cord separation but will not prevent colonization of the umbilical area.
Résumé
Dans une étude sur échantillon aléatoire et contrôlé, on a comparé l’efficacité de l’alcool à celle de l’eau pour favoriser la séparation du cordon ombilical. Les taux de colonisation bactérienne cutanée entre les groupes ont également été comparés à trois reprises. Le temps de séparation du cordon, les taux de colonisation et les types d’organismes colonisateurs ont aussi été comparés entre les groupes. Sur les 148 participants, 136 (92 %) ont complété le protocole de recherche. Les cordons ombilicaux nettoyés avec de l’eau stérile se sont séparés plus rapidement que ceux nettoyés avec de l’alcool (t = 3,15, p = 0,002). On n’a pas relevé de différences dans les taux de colonisation des différents groupes (F = 1,59, D = 2, p = 0,205). Il n’y a pas eu d’infections ombilicales ou autres. La colonisation bactérienne de la région ombilicale et de la peau adjacente apparaît avec le temps chez les nouveau-nés, nés à terme et en bonne santé. Le nettoyage avec de l’alcool augmente le temps de séparation du cordon et ne prévient pas la colonisation bactérienne de la région ombilicale.
Footnotes
This project was funded by grants from the Perinatal Research Centre at the University of Alberta.
References
- 1.Arad I, Eyal F, Fainmesser P. Umbilical care and cord separation. Arch Dis Child. 1981;56:887–88. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.11.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tötterman LE, Autio S. Treatment of the umbilical cord of the newborn. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1970;49:57–59. doi: 10.3109/00016347009157515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barrett FF, Mason EO, Fleming D. The effect of three cord-care regimens on bacterial colonization of normal newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1979;94(5):796–99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80159-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Andrich MP, Golden SM. Umbilical cord care. A study of bacitracin ointment, vs. triple dye. Clin Pediatr. 1984;23(6):342–44. doi: 10.1177/000992288402300609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schuman AJ, Oksol BA. The effect of isopropyl alcohol and triple dye on umbilical cord separation time. Military Medicine. 1985;150:49–50. doi: 10.1093/milmed/150.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gladstone IG, Clapper L, Thorp JW, Wright DI. Randomized study of six umbilical cord care regimens. Clin Pediatr. 1988;27(3):127–29. doi: 10.1177/000992288802700302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Salariya EM, Kowbus NM. Midwifery. 1988. Variable umbilical cord care; pp. 70–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mansell H. Cord care appraised. The Australian Nurses Journal. 1990;20(2):22–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meberg A, Schøyen R. Hydrophobic material in routine umbilical cord care and prevention of infections in newborn infants. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;22:729–33. doi: 10.3109/00365549009027128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Verber IG, Pagan FS. What cord care — if any? Arch Dis Child. 1993;68:594–96. doi: 10.1136/adc.68.5_Spec_No.594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bhalla JN, Nafis N, Rohatgi P, Singh J. Some observations on the separation of the umbilical stump in the newborn. Indian J Pediatr. 1975;42(334):329–34. doi: 10.1007/BF02829329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lawrence CR. Midwives Chronicle and Nursing Notes. 1982. Effect of two different methods of umbilical cord care on its separation time; pp. 204–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Naor N, Merlob P, Litwin A, Wielunsky E. Time of separation of the umbilical cord: A comparative study of treatment with alcohol and rikospray. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989;32:89–93. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(89)90188-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Barclay L, Harrington A, Conroy R, et al. A comparative study of neonates’ umbilical cord management. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1994;11(3):34–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bourke E. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1990. Cord care: Too much or too little; pp. 19–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martin G, Streng J, Miller M. Current bathing techniques in newborn nurseries in the United States. Am J Dis Child. 1983;37(6):529–30. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barr J. Midwives Chronicle and Nursing Notes. 1984. The umbilical cord: To treat or not to treat? pp. 224–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ronchera-Oms C, Hernández C, Jimémez NV. Arch Dis Child. 1994. Antiseptic cord care reduces bacterial colonisation but delays cord detachment. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Samuel M, Freeman NV, Vaishnav A, et al. J Pediatr Surg. 1994. Necrotizing fasciitis: A serious complication of omphalitis in neonates; pp. 1414–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvardo CJ. Lancet. 1991. Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters; pp. 339–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rais-Bahrami K, Schulte EB, Navqi M. Postnatal timing of spontaneous umbilical cord separation. Am J Perinatol. 1993;10(6):453–54. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wilson CB, Ochs HD, Almquist J, et al. When is umbilical cord separation delayed? J Pediatr. 1985;07(2):292–94. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(85)80154-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bygdeman S, Hambraeus A, Henningson A, et al. Influence of ethanol with and without chlorhexidine on the bacterial colonization of the umbilicus of newborn infants. Infect Control. 1984;5(6):275–78. doi: 10.1017/S019594170006032X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smales O. A comparison of umbilical cord treatment in the control of superficial infection. N Z Med J. 1988;101:453–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]