Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0227829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227829

Abnormal LAMP1 glycosylation may play a role in Niemann-Pick disease, type C pathology

Niamh X Cawley 1,, Caitlin Sojka 1,, Antony Cougnoux 1, Anna T Lyons 1, Elena‐Raluca Nicoli 2, Christopher A Wassif 1, Forbes D Porter 1,*
Editor: Andrea Dardis3
PMCID: PMC6992233  PMID: 31999726

Abstract

A hallmark of Niemann-Pick disease, type C (NPC) is the progressive degeneration of Purkinje neurons in the cerebellum caused by the accumulation of free cholesterol and glycosphingolipids in the lysosome. Recent studies suggest that the state of glycosylation of lysosomal membrane proteins may play a role in disease progression. Our study has identified the presence of a highly glycosylated form of Lysosome Associated Membrane Protein 1 (LAMP1) that correlated spatiotemporally with Purkinje neuron loss. This form of LAMP1 was predominantly localized to activated microglia; showing a ~5-fold increase in surface labeling by FACS analysis. This suggests a potential role for LAMP1 in the neuro-inflammatory process in these mice during disease progression. Analysis of other mouse models of neurodegeneration that exhibit neuro-inflammation showed little or no presence of this glycosylated form of LAMP1, suggesting this observation for LAMP1 is specific to NPC disease. Furthermore, early treatment of Npc1-/- mice with 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD), significantly prevented the appearance of the glycosylated LAMP1 in the cerebellum of Npc1-/- mice at 7 weeks, consistent with the prevention of neuro-inflammation in mice treated with this drug. Treatment of Npc1-/- mice with HPβCD at 7 weeks, after disease onset, did not reverse or prevent further appearance of the hyperglycosylated LAMP1, demonstrating that once this aspect of neuro-inflammation began, it continued despite the HPβCD treatment. Analysis of LAMP1 in cerebellar tissue of NPC1 patients showed a small level of hyperglycosylated LAMP1 in the tissue, however, this was not seen in the CSF of patients.

Introduction

Niemann-Pick disease, type C (NPC) is a fatal, neurodegenerative disorder characterized by an accumulation of un-esterified cholesterol and glycosphingolipids in endo-lysosomal compartments of cells [1, 2]. The disease is autosomal recessive, where patients carry mutations in either NPC1 or NPC2 that encode for proteins normally involved in the binding and transport of unesterified cholesterol out of the lysosome [35]. The cholesterol can then be distributed to other cellular organelles [4, 6, 7]. The disease affects ~1:120,000 births [2] and is classified as a rare lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) [8, 9] that ultimately results in early death of the patient.

Lysosomes are membrane-bound cellular organelles containing hydrolytic enzymes that are responsible for the degradation of proteins and lipids for re-use within the cell. Membrane proteins of the lysosome play a role in this break-down process, in addition to being involved with the trafficking and fusion of lysosomes with other compartments of the endosomal/lysosomal pathway [1012]. One major group of these proteins are lysosome-associated membrane proteins (LAMPs); type I integral membrane proteins with heavily glycosylated luminal domains and short cytosolic tails [13]. LAMP1 and LAMP2, which are similar in size and structure, together make up about 50% of all lysosomal membrane proteins [11], however, their exact role in the function of the lysosome is complex [14, 15]. Mice deficient in LAMP1 (Lamp1-/-) appear to be normal, as they do not exhibit any significant global differences compared to control mice (Lamp1+/+) [16]. However, at the tissue level, mild astrogliosis in the neocortex is observed, and a compensatory increase in LAMP2 protein is seen primarily in the kidney. In contrast, LAMP2 knock out (KO) mice (Lamp2-/y) exhibit a completely different phenotype, suggesting the two proteins may have distinct functions. Lamp2-/y mice recapitulate Danon disease, an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder characterized by (cardio)myopathy and intellectual dysfunction [17, 18]. Indeed, hippocampal dysfunction due to inflammation, and accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and lipid storage in neurons, reminiscent of NPC neuropathology [2], may provide insight into the neuropathological phenotype observed in these KO mice. Parenthetically, double mutant Lamp1-/-/Lamp2-/y mice are embryonically lethal. Embryonic fibroblasts from these mice accumulate cholesterol which can be rescued by overexpression of Lamp2, but not Lamp1 [19], further suggesting a divergence in function of these two similar proteins.

Both LAMP1 and LAMP2 are heavily glycosylated on their luminal domains; predominantly composed of N-linked glycans, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) linked to asparagine residues. In addition, O-linked glycans, N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), are linked to serine or threonine residues [20, 21]. The glycan structures form a lining on the inner leaflet of the lysosome, known as the glycocalyx, an approximately 8 nm barrier [15], that can protect the LAMPs and other membrane components of the lysosome from degradation by hydrolytic enzymes [14]. Recently, several studies demonstrate that LAMP1 glycosylation is altered in NPC1 and may contribute to the accumulation of cholesterol and glycosphingolipids [8, 9]. Treatment of NPC1 fibroblasts with an inhibitor of O-linked glycosylation, reduced cholesterol storage and increased cholesterol efflux from the cells [8], suggesting that the reduced glycosylation of LAMP1 could be beneficial in reducing the NPC1 disease phenotype. In addition, a recent report identified a key enzyme in the O-linked glycosylation pathway, β3GALT5, that is differentially expressed across the lobules of the cerebellum [22], suggesting a possible difference in the glycosylation complexity of LAMP1 in the lobules that are resistant to neurodegeneration. Considering these observations, we undertook to investigate the physical characteristics of LAMP1 and LAMP2 in the cerebellum of Npc1-/- mice during disease progression. While we found increased expression levels for both proteins, a highly glycosylated form of LAMP1 was spatially and temporally correlated with disease progression. Our data suggest that abnormal glycosylation of LAMP1 may play a role in NPC pathology.

Materials and methods

Animal maintenance and tissue collection

All animal work conformed to the National Institutes of Health guidelines and was approved by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol #18–002). BALB/c-Npc1+/-, BALB/c-Npc2+/-, and C57BL/6J- SOD1G93A (Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mucolipidosis type IV mice, C57BL6-Mcoln1+/-, were a gift from Dr. James Pickel (NIMH, NIH) and Fabry mice, C57BL6-Gla-/-, were a gift from Dr. Ashok Kulkarni (NIDCR, NIH) [23, 24]. Adult experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) mice, sacrificed at 12 weeks of age, were a gift from Dr. Keiko Ozato (NICHD, NIH) [25]. Cerebellar tissue from ASM mice was generously provided by Dr. Steven Walkley (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY). Cerebellar tissue from Sandhoff (Hexbtm1Rlp) [26] and GM1 (Glb1) mice, was generously provided by Dr. Cindy Tifft (NHGRI, NIH). Pups were weaned 3 weeks after birth and subsequently had free access to water and normal mouse chow. PCR genotyping was performed using tail or ear DNA. Npc1-/- mice were sacrificed at 3, 5, 6, 7, and 9 weeks of age, while all other mouse models were sacrificed at the respective peak of disease severity. For drug treatment, mice were injected (SQ) with Kleptose HPB (2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD); VTS-270; 4000 mg/kg) (Roquette, Vacquemont, France) or the vehicle control (PBS), every 3 days starting at either 21 days (pre-symptomatic) or 49 days (symptomatic), until sacrifice and analysis as indicated.

Immunofluorescence and cerebellum micro-dissection

Control and mutant mice (7–9 weeks of age) were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and transcardially perfused with room temperature (RT) phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Whole brain was removed and either collected in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS, pH 7.4 for immunofluorescence (see below) or the cerebellum was removed, and flash frozen on dry ice for subsequent micro-dissection. For micro-dissection, the hemispheres were removed using a cold razor blade prior to a midline sagittal cut to split the vermis in half. Each half vermis was then placed on its side in 100 μl of ice-cold PBS and micro-dissected under a dissection microscope. Lobules I to V were collected as the anterior region, lobules VI to VIII as the middle region and lobules IX and X as the posterior region.

For immunofluorescence, the brains were post-fixed in 4% PFA solution for 24 h, then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose. Cerebellar tissues were cryostat-sectioned parasagittally (20 μm) and floating sections collected in PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100. Sections were blocked for 30 min in 10% normal goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO, USA) and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody. Primary antibodies included: rabbit anti-calbindin (1:400, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-GFAP (1:500, Novus Biologicals, LLC, Littleton, CO, USA), anti-Iba1 (1:500, Wako Pure Chemicals Industries Osaka, Japan), anti-Olig-2 (1:200, Millipore Sigma, Billerica, MA, USA), anti-LAMP1 (1:200, DSHB, Iowa City, IA, USA) and anti-LAMP1-Alexa-488 (1:100, Biolegend, San Diego, CA). Secondary antibodies include Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rat IgG, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG, and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-chicken IgY (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Hoechst 33342, Trihydrochloride, Trihydrate I (1:1000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to stain the nuclei. Images were taken on either a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Zeiss, Germany) or a Zeiss 780 confocal microscope (NICHD Microscopy Core Facility).

Protein extraction and Western blots

Total protein was extracted from cells and tissues using ice cold T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Scientific, USA) supplemented with 1% Triton X-100, and 1X Mammalian ProteaseArrest inhibitor cocktail (G-Biosciences, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein quantification was performed using the DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein lysates (typically 10–20μg) were analysed by Western blot on 4–12% gradient or 12% NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Protein transfer was performed using the iBLOT 2 dry transfer apparatus (Life Technologies Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Following transfer, nitrocellulose membranes were incubated in a 1X PBS/0.1% Tween 20 blocking buffer with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at RT, followed by incubation in the primary antibody overnight at 4°C. After the initial incubation, the membrane was rinsed with 1X PBS/0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody for 1 h at RT. Membrane development was carried out using either the Bio-Rad chemiluminescence detection kit or the LI-COR Biosciences Odyssey CLx Imaging System. Primary antibodies used include: anti-LAMP1 (1:2,000, Cell Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-β-actin (1:2,000, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-Glutamine Synthetase (1:1,000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-β-III Tubulin (1:1,000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-LAMP2 (1:1,000, Clone ABL-93, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa), anti-LIMP2 (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-GFAP (1:1000, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA). Secondary antibodies used include: anti-mouse IgG-HRP or anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:10,000, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), goat-anti-chicken IgY(IgG) (H+L)-HRP conjugate (1:10,000, Advansta, Menlo Park, CA, USA), IRDye 800CW goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (1:15,000, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). For quantitation, band intensities (integrated adjusted signal) were normalized to β-actin using Image Studio Lite Ver 5.2 software (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA).

Deglycosylation of LAMP1

Whole cerebellum protein lysate was extracted, as described above, from age-matched 7-week wild type (Npc1+/+) and mutant (Npc1-/-) mice. N-glycanase, an asparagine amidase that cleaves the Asn-GlcNac bond of N-glycans, and Endoglycosidase H (Endo H), a glycosidase that cleaves within the chitobiose core of complex mannose and some hybrid oligosaccharides (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA), were used to characterize the glycosylation complexity of LAMP1. Cerebellum protein lysates were treated with and without N-glycanase or Endo H in duplicates, according to the kit protocol (New England Biolabs). The treated lysates were analyzed by Western blot for LAMP1.

Immunoprecipitation

Whole cerebellum was used from age-matched 7-week control (Npc1+/+) and mutant (Npc1-/-) mice. For primary microglia isolation, tissue was dissociated and prepared using papain, following the manufacturer’s protocol (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA). The anti-CDllb (microglia) MicroBead kit for human and mouse, was used to isolate primary microglia from whole cerebella following the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA, USA). Samples were analyzed by Western blot for LAMP1, CD11b and glutamine synthase.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting

Mice were euthanized in a CO2 chamber and then transcardially perfused with 25 ml 1X PBS. The cerebellum was recovered from the brain and suspended in ice cold FACS buffer (PBS containing 0.5% BSA (Sigma)). Tissue samples were gently homogenized on a sterile culture dish and collected in 7 ml FACS buffer. A discontinuous Percoll gradient 30–70% (GE Healthcare) was prepared and samples were centrifuged 2,450 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells at the 70% interface were collected, washed twice in FACS Buffer and stained for live\dead cells using the Violet live\dead dye (1:500, Life Technology), CX3CR1 (1:25, R&D), CD11b (1:100, Biolegend), CD45 (1:100, Biolegend). Live, triple positive cells were isolated using FACS Aria 3 (BD Biosciences), performed by the NHLBI, NIH core facility. For select experiments, cells were also stained for LAMP1 (1/100, Biolegend) and cells positive for all four markers were isolated.

Lipopolysaccharide treatment

Microglia were isolated from Npc1+/+ mice as described above. Cells were immediately plated in 12-well culture dish (BD, San Diego, CA, USA) and left overnight in 37ºC, 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. The following day, the DMEM growth medium (Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% FBS (Omega Scientific, Offenburg, Germany), was changed. Six hours post-medium change, the cells were rinsed twice with 1X PBS, and fresh medium containing 1μg/ml Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide O55:B5 (LPS, Invitrogen, USA) was added to the cells. After a 60-min incubation in the LPS-medium, cells were rinsed twice with 1X PBS and harvested for analysis by Western blot.

Human samples

Human post-mortem cerebellar samples from NPC1 patients were obtained from University of Maryland Brain and Tissue Bank (https://www.medschool.umaryland.edu/btbank/). All NPC1 CSF samples were collected by lumbar puncture in the L4/L5 interspace of patients who were enrolled in an Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Institutional Review Board-approved longitudinal Natural History observational trial at the National Institutes of Health between August 2006 and January 2011 (06-CH-0186, NCT00344331). Cerebrospinal fluid from five females and five males of varying age and severity was used in this study. Single donor normal human CSF from five females and five males was purchased from Innovative Research, Novi, MI. All samples were stored at -80°C prior to being assayed.

Concentration of CSF for Western blot analysis

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, 270 μl) proteins were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for ~18 h at 4°C, centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 x g, and the pellet reconstituted in 30 μl 1X SDS-sample buffer. An aliquot of this was analyzed by Coomassie staining after separation on a 4–12% NuPage gel (Invitrogen), and total protein per lane was quantified by the Odyssey infra-red (IR) scanner in the 700 nm channel. In parallel, an aliquot was analyzed by standard Western blotting procedures for LAMP1 detection, using rabbit-anti-LAMP1 (1: 2,000, Cell Signaling) and the Odyssey IR dye labeled secondary anti-rabbit-800 antibodies (1: 10,000, LI-COR). Integrated signals for both the Coomassie stained proteins (700 nm channel) and the immuno-detected LAMP1 (800 nm channel) were used to calculate the relative levels of LAMP1/protein per CSF sample.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were done using R/R Studio software (Boston, MA, USA). P-values < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.

Results

NPC1 mouse central nervous system tissues have two distinct forms of LAMP1

Initial Western blot analysis of tissues from control mice (Npc1+/+) showed a single ~75 kDa-sized LAMP1 protein in CNS tissues compared to the expected size of 90–120 kDa sized-LAMP1 seen in the peripheral tissues (Fig 1A). In comparison to Npc1+/+ mice, CNS tissues of Npc1-/- mice showed an overall increase in the ~75 kDa LAMP1 expression as well as the appearance of an additional larger, more diffuse LAMP1 band at ~90–120 kDa in size (Fig 1B, top panel). Analysis of two other lysosomal membrane proteins, LAMP2 and LIMP2, also showed a general increase in expression levels in Npc1-/- CNS tissues, however, there was no apparent higher molecular mass band observed for these proteins when compared to Npc1+/+ tissues (Fig 1B, middle and lower panels). The size estimate of ~75 kDa was based on its position on Western blots compared to standards and an endogenous marker HSP70 (S1 Fig).

Fig 1. Lysosomal membrane proteins in NPC1 tissues.

Fig 1

A. Western blot of 7-week Npc1+/+ peripheral tissues (liver, pancreas, kidney, spleen) and CNS tissues (cerebellum, hindbrain, spinal cord, olfactory bulb) for LAMP1 and actin (loading control). B. Western blot of CNS tissues from 9-week Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice for LAMP1, LAMP2, and LIMP2. β-III tubulin was used as a loading control. The asterisk (*) marks the larger size of LAMP1 that is referenced as hyperglycosylated LAMP1 in the text. Arrow indicates LAMP1 size of ~75 kDa in CNS tissue (see S1 Fig for size estimate).

Larger LAMP1 appears in the same spatiotemporal pattern as Purkinje neuron degeneration in NPC1 mouse cerebella

In Npc1-/- cerebellar extracts, Western blot analysis showed that the larger form of LAMP1 appears first between 5 and 7 weeks of age, whereas in Npc1+/+ cerebellar extracts only the ~75 kDa form is present (Fig 2A). The appearance of this larger protein correlates with the onset of phenotypic disease progression of NPC1. Further analysis showed that the larger form relative to the smaller form of LAMP1 in Npc1-/- appears first in the anterior region of the cerebellum at 6 weeks of age compared to the posterior region (Fig 2B). This also correlates with the disease-related Purkinje neuron death pattern, which occurs in the cerebellum of NPC1 in an anterior to posterior manner at these ages [1].

Fig 2. Spatiotemporal expression pattern of LAMP1.

Fig 2

A. Western blot of total cerebellar extract from Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice at 3, 5, 7, and 9 weeks of age, for LAMP1 and actin (loading control). B. Western blot of anterior (A), middle (M), and posterior (P) regions of cerebellum from Npc1−/− mice at 5, 6, and 7 weeks of age, for LAMP1. C. The Western blot in (B) was replicated with different mice (n = 4) and the LAMP1 ratio (intensity of the higher molecular weight band to the lower molecular weight band) was calculated. The means of LAMP1 ratios were graphed. Two-way ANOVA indicates a significant difference (P<0.001) in LAMP1 ratio across age, but only a trend across cerebellar region (P = 0.055). There is no significant interaction between age and cerebellar region (P>0.05).

A two-way ANOVA compared the ratios of the upper to the lower LAMP1 band intensities across age (5, 6, 7 weeks) and cerebellar lobule region (anterior, middle, posterior). The ratio of the upper to the lower LAMP1 signal is significantly increased across ages (p<0.001). In addition, the intensity of the larger LAMP1 band tended to be differentially expressed in an anterior to posterior manner, most noticeably at 6 weeks of age, although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055; Fig 2C).

The larger LAMP1 protein in Npc1-/- cerebellum contains complex N-linked glycosylation

Treatment of total cerebellar extracts from Npc1+/+ and Npc1-/- mice with N-glycanase followed by Western blot analysis showed that all forms of LAMP1 present in this tissue were susceptible to N-linked deglycosylation (Fig 3A). The resulting deglycosylated LAMP1 is ~40 kDa in size; a size consistent with the size of the protein backbone of the LAMP1 [27]. Furthermore, this suggests that LAMP1 is differentially N-glycosylated in the cerebellum during disease progression of NPC1. In contrast to N-glycanase treatment, extracts treated with endoglycosidase H (Endo H) showed that only the ~75 kDa LAMP1 and a small amount of the larger LAMP1 were susceptible to this form of deglycosylation (Fig 3B). The larger LAMP1 form was predominantly resistant to Endo H, demonstrating that the larger form of LAMP1 (now referred to as hyperglycosylated LAMP1) contained complex or hybrid N-linked glycosylation. Analysis of LAMP1 from other areas of the brain of Npc1-/- mice gave similar results (S2A Fig). Of note was the observation that LAMP1 from peripheral tissue was also Endo H resistant (S2B Fig), suggestive of a peripheral LAMP1 glycosylation phenotype in the CNS of affected NPC1 mice. The overall weaker signal for LAMP1 in the treated samples may reflect a loss of protein due to low level protease degradation or a reduced antibody affinity.

Fig 3. Higher molecular weight is due to LAMP1 hyperglycosylation.

Fig 3

A. LAMP1 Western blot of 9-week Npc1+/+ pancreas and cerebellum and Npc1−/− cerebellum extract treated with (+) and without (-) N-glycanase. B. LAMP1 Western blot of 9-week Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− cerebellum extract treated with (+) and without (-) Endo H.

Immunofluorescence (IF) and immunoprecipitation (IP) show that hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is associated with microglia

To investigate the cellular localization of the hyperglycosylated LAMP1, IF was performed on Npc1+/+ and Npc1-/- cerebella. Cerebellar sections were co-stained for LAMP1 and several different cell markers including: Iba1 (microglia), Calbindin 1 (Purkinje neurons), Olig2 (oligodendrocytes), GFAP (reactive astrocytes), and S100β (Bergmann glia). In Npc1+/+ cerebellum, LAMP1 is present in a distinct pattern predominantly aligned with the Purkinje neuron layer (S3 Fig). Higher magnification shows apparent staining of LAMP1 in Purkinje neuron soma as well as other cells surrounding the Purkinje neurons (S4A Fig). In contrast to LAMP1 staining in Npc1+/+ cerebellum, the distribution of LAMP1 in Npc1-/- is more disorderly. Its distinct pattern is disrupted as the Purkinje neurons degenerate (S4B Fig). In addition, a more wide-spread and stronger staining pattern of LAMP1, that is not restricted to the Purkinje neuron layer, is seen throughout all the lobules of the cerebellum. Confocal microscopy of the cerebellum confirmed that LAMP1 immunostaining was present in the calbindin-positive soma of the Purkinje neurons from Npc1+/+ cerebellum (Fig 4A). In addition, LAMP1 also co-stained with S100β positive cells of Npc1+/+ mice suggesting expression of LAMP1 in Bergmann glia (Fig 4C). In Npc1-/- cerebellum, LAMP1 immunostaining increased throughout the lobule and was present in residual Purkinje neurons (Fig 4B). There was an overall increase in S100β staining in the Npc1-/- cerebellum consistent with the increase in astrogliosis in the disease state (Fig 4D).

Fig 4. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of 7-week-old Npc1+/+ and Npc1-/- lobule I cerebellum.

Fig 4

(A) LAMP1 staining (green) is present in the soma of Purkinje neurons (red) and other cells in the Purkinje cell layer of Npc1+/+ cerebellum. (B) There is a dramatic loss of Purkinje neurons in Npc1-/- cerebellum at this age and a general increase in LAMP1 staining. (C) Other LAMP1 positive cells were identified as Bergmann glia by their localization and co-staining with S100β (arrows). (D) Increased S100β staining is observed in Npc1-/- consistent with an increase in astrogliosis. Sections were counterstained with Hoechst 3342 (blue), distinguishing the granule cell layer (GCL) from the molecular layer (ML).

In Npc1-/- cerebellum, LAMP1 strongly co-stains with Iba1, a surface marker for microglia (Fig 5A). There was no apparent co-staining of LAMP1 with Olig2 (Fig 5B), a marker for oligodendrocytes and only weak co-staining with GFAP, a marker of reactive astrocytes including Bergmann glia (Fig 5C).

Fig 5. LAMP1 co-staining in the cerebellum.

Fig 5

Immunohistochemistry of midline sagittal cerebellar sections of 9-week Npc1-/- mice with LAMP1 (red) and different cerebellar cell markers (green), including: Iba1 (A), Olig2 (B), and GFAP (C), counterstained with DAPI (blue). Closed-arrows marks Olig2-positive oligodendrocytes (green). Cerebellar lobule numbers are indicated.

To confirm the presumed localization of LAMP1 in microglia, magnetic bead immunoprecipitation (IP) was used to isolate specific cell types. Intact microglia (CD11b+) from whole cerebellar extracts of 7-week old Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice were isolated. Western blot analysis of these samples indicated that all the hyperglycosylated LAMP1 in Npc1−/− cerebellum is present in the immunopurified CD11b+ microglia (Fig 6A). Similar results were observed for the analysis of hyperglycosylated LAMP1 in the cerebella of Npc2+/− and Npc2−/− mice (S5A Fig). As a control, the hyperglycosylated LAMP1 was not present in immunopurified astrocytes when performed on Npc2−/− cerebella (S5B Fig). These results collectively suggest that the hyperglycosylated form of LAMP1 in the diseased state for NPC1 and NPC2 is almost exclusively in activated microglia. Indeed, purified microglia from control mice in culture exhibited only the hyperglycosylated LAMP1 form in these cells (S6 Fig). Additionally, treatment of these cells in culture with Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), to induce microglia activation, did not result in the appearance of additional LAMP1 forms, although the slightly more diffuse nature of the band would suggest a more heterogenous level of glycosylation upon activation (S6 Fig).

Fig 6. Hyperglycosylated Npc1−/− LAMP1 is present predominantly in microglia.

Fig 6

(A) LAMP1 Western blot of cell lysate from 7-week Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mouse cerebella that underwent tissue dissociation and subsequent CD11b immunoprecipitation. A. Lanes show 10% of the un-bound (UB) and bound (B) fractions of CD11b immunoprecipitation (microglia) reaction. An aliquot representing 3% of the starting material is indicated by S. B. FACS analysis of activated cerebellar microglia. Shown is the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of LAMP1 for Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− cerebellar cells that were triple-positive for: CX3CR1, CD11b, CD45.

Although LAMP1 is a lysosomal protein, it has been reported that LAMP1 may also reside on the plasma membrane of some cells and play a role in cellular migration [2729]. To test this, fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of cerebellar cells, positive for three microglial surface markers: CX3CR1+, CD11b+, CD45low, along with LAMP1, was performed. The results showed a ~5-fold increase in the presence of LAMP1 on the surface of the activated microglia isolated from Npc1−/− mice compared to those from control Npc1+/+ mice (Fig 6B).

Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is associated with the neuro-inflammatory phenotype of NPC

Activated microglia is a hallmark of neuro-inflammation in the CNS. To determine if the hyperglycosylated LAMP1 observed on activated microglia of NPC1 was specific to the neuro-inflammation associated with NPC, Western blot analysis was performed on affected CNS tissues from several mouse models of neurodegeneration at the ages where neuro-inflammation is present; Niemann-Pick, type C1 and C2 (Npc1, Npc2), Niemann-Pick, Type A/B (Acid Sphingomyelinase (ASM); Smpd1), Sandhoff (Hexbtm1Rlp), GM1 (Glb1), Mucolipidosis Type IV (ML4; Mcoln1), Experimental Autoimmune Encephalitis (EAE), and a model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) (SOD1G93A). As a negative control, tissue from a mouse model of Fabry disease (Gla), a lysosomal storage disease that does not exhibit neuro-inflammation, was also analyzed. The results showed that the distinct hyperglycosylated form of LAMP1 is predominantly in samples from affected Npc1−/− and Npc2−/− mice (cerebellum) (Fig 7A and S5 Fig), and to a lesser extent in the affected Sandhoff and GM1 mice (Fig 7B). A small amount was observed in the ALS mice (Fig 7C) (spinal cord) and no distinct hyperglycosylated LAMP1 was observed in the ASM (Fig 7A), ML4 (hippocampus) or EAE (cerebellum) mouse tissues analyzed. As expected, cerebellum from affected Fabry mice was negative for hyperglycosylated LAMP1 (Fig 7C).

Fig 7. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is unique to NPC diseases.

Fig 7

A. LAMP1 Western blot of whole cerebellar lysate from 18-week Npc1+/+, 9-week Npc1−/− and 7- and 20-week-old acid sphingomyelinase KO mice (Niemann Pick Type A/B). B. LAMP1 Western blot of whole cerebellar lysate from control (+/+) and affected (-/-) ~18-week-old Hexb (Sandhoff) and 32-week-old Glb1 (GM1) mice. C. LAMP1 Western blot of tissue lysate from control and mutant 20-week-old SOD1 mice (spinal cord), 12-week-old EAE mice and PBS control (cerebellum) and 32-week-old ML4 mice (hippocampus). Mouse cerebellar lysate from a 16-week-old Fabry mouse was used as a neuro-inflammation negative control.

2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD), a drug currently in a phase 2b/3 clinical trial for the treatment of NPC1, was recently shown to delay the neuro-inflammation phenotype in Npc1−/− mice [30]. Since hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is observed with the activated microglia during the neuro-inflammatory process in NPC, treatment of Npc1−/− mice with HPβCD might be expected to reduce or eliminate the presence of hyperglycosylated LAMP1. Indeed, Western blot analysis showed that Npc1−/− mice treated with HPβCD had only trace amounts of the hyperglycosylated LAMP1 compared to the Npc1−/− mice treated with PBS (Fig 8A), consistent with the reduced neuro-inflammatory phenotype in the HPβCD treated mice [30]. Treatment of 7-week-old affected NPC1 mice with HPβCD for 2 weeks did not appear to significantly alter the disease progression (Fig 8B).

Fig 8. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is regulated by 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin treatment.

Fig 8

A. LAMP1 and β-tubulin Western blot of total cerebellar extract from 7-week-old Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice treated with either 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) or the vehicle control (PBS) every 3 days starting at 3 weeks of age. B. LAMP1 and β-tubulin Western blot of total cerebellar extract from 9-week-old Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice treated with either 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) or the vehicle control (PBS) every 3 days starting at 7 weeks of age. Two untreated littermate controls (Npc1+/+ and Npc1-/-) were analyzed at 7 weeks of age. DOL, day of life.

LAMP1 in cerebellar tissues and CSF of individuals with NPC1

To investigate if the observations in mice could be seen in humans; tissue and CSF from NPC1 and control patients were analyzed. Western blot analysis of cerebellar tissue from NPC1 patients and age-matched controls showed that the predominant form of LAMP1 was smaller (~75–80 kDa) than the expected ~90–120 kDa size for LAMP1. This result is similar to the results obtained from the mouse model and indicates a possible conserved functional role for LAMP1 in the CNS that does not require the extensive and more complex N-linked glycosylation that is found normally in the peripheral tissues. In NPC1 tissue, the presence of higher diffuse bands of LAMP1, indicative of hyperglycosylation, were observed in the cerebellum (Fig 9B); however, while LAMP1 was detected in the CSF of control and NPC1 samples, the predominant size in all cases was ~75–80 kDa, a size consistent with the hypo-glycosylated LAMP1 found in mouse and human CNS tissue. There was no difference in total levels of LAMP1 in the CSF between the two groups and a hyperglycosylated form of LAMP1 was not apparent in the CSF samples (S7 Fig).

Fig 9. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is present in NPC1 postmortem CNS tissue.

Fig 9

Western blot of human cerebellar tissue extracts from NPC1 (-/-) and age-matched controls (+/+). The Western blot shows LAMP1 with β-tubulin and β-actin as loading controls.

Discussion

In Niemann-Pick disease, type C (NPC), excess cholesterol accumulation in the endo-lysosomal compartment is caused by defects in one of two lysosomal proteins, either NPC1 or NPC2. These defects have far reaching consequences that affect cell function and viability. Understanding downstream pathways or other molecular components, that contribute to NPC pathology and might be amenable to intervention, is essential for developing therapies for NPC.

The role of glycosylation is one of many aspects of NPC that have been studied previously. The micro-heterogeneity in the size of NPC2 in late endosomes from Npc1-/- mice is due to differential N-linked glycosylation and appears to enhance the amount of NPC2 associated with an insoluble fraction after extraction [31]. The secretion of this form of NPC2 into bile may contribute to cholesterol transport in normal and disease states. Upon secretion it co-purifies with the pro-nucleating fraction of bile that can initiate cholesterol crystallization [32]. In the brain, the complexity of the glycosylation pattern of ApoE, a key player in cholesterol metabolism, is changed in the Npc1-/- mouse. The change in complex glycosylation and sialyation in ApoE correlates with Aβ (42) accumulation and this change may play a role in Aβ (42) clearance [33].

Recently it has been shown that the reduction of the glycocalyx in NPC1 fibroblasts in culture, by inhibiting O-linked glycosylation with benzyl-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside (BADG), was shown to increase cholesterol efflux from these cells and reduce cholesterol storage in the lysosomes in vitro [8]. This suggests that the glycosylation state of LAMP1 (and LAMP2) may be an important factor in the overall mechanism of cholesterol efflux from the lysosome. A recent study found predominantly complex sialylated N-glycans in purified lysosomes from NPC1-null fibroblasts, in comparison to lysosomes from wild type cells, which had high-mannose N-glycans [9]. Such complexity gives rise to differences in the physico-chemical properties on the inner leaflet of the lysosome e.g. an increased net negative charge due to the sialic acid residues. This may add to the barrier effect of the glycocalyx and increase cholesterol retention in the lysosome. Pfeffer and colleagues [34] showed that LAMP1 and 2 can specifically bind cholesterol, and proposed that such binding may contribute to the handoff of cholesterol to NPC1 under normal conditions to contribute to cholesterol efflux from the lysosome [34]. In addition, a recent proteomics report on NPC patient cells and overexpression studies in HeLa cells have indicated a direct role of LAMP1 in alleviating cholesterol storage in these cells [35]. The concept of LAMPs functioning as a “store” of cholesterol is not without merit considering the stoichiometry and binding parameters of cholesterol to the LAMPs [34]. It is noteworthy, however, that the forms of LAMP1 used to bind cholesterol in the experiments by Pfeffer and colleagues were expressed in HEK293 or HeLa cells and as such would represent the “wild type” glycomic pattern of LAMP1. We speculate that the binding parameters of cholesterol to NPC1-cell derived LAMP1 might be different and could provide further insight into this mechanism in the disease state.

In characterizing the glycosylation state of LAMP1 in NPC1 mouse tissue, we observed differentially glycosylated forms across the lobules in the cerebellum of NPC1 mice that correlated spatiotemporally with disease progression and Purkinje neuron death (Fig 2) [1]. While the predominant hyperglycosylated form was subsequently identified as being present in activated microglia (discussed below), we observed a hypo-glycosylated, Endo H sensitive, form that was found in control (Npc1+/+) and pre- and post-symptomatic Npc1−/− CNS tissues. It was noticeably smaller (~75 kDa) than that found in peripheral tissues (~90–120 kDa) (Fig 1); a finding that may represent a functional difference between peripheral and CNS LAMP1. The size of LAMP2 in CNS tissue is also smaller than seen in peripheral tissue ([18] and Fig 1), suggesting that a general difference might exist in the glycocalyx of lysosomes in the tissues of the CNS compared to peripheral tissues and would be predicted to result in a less complex glycocalyx specific to the CNS. LAMP2 and another lysosomal membrane protein, LIMP2, also showed an apparent general increase in the levels of these proteins in the diseased state (Fig 1), most likely because of the disease-related lysosomal/endosomal dysfunction and subsequent up-regulation to compensate.

The more prominent hyperglycosylated LAMP1 form was a surprising observation. Normally, LAMP1 in the cerebellum is ~75 kDa which we have shown is colocalized with Calbindin-positive cells (Purkinje neurons) and S100β-positive cells (Bergmann glia, BG) (Fig 4). This suggests that these cells under normal conditions may be more active in their (endo)lysosomal pathways than the other cells in the cerebellum. The exact role that BG play in NPC disease is unknown since the Purkinje neuron death appears cell-autonomous [36, 37]. However, poor morphological differentiation and function of BG in NPC [38], indicate they may contribute to the disease such as in glutamate buffering. The role LAMP1 plays in this function remains to be studied. The hyperglycosylated LAMP1 we observe is resistant to Endo H deglycosylation, demonstrating the presence of complex N-linked glycans; a pattern and size similar to LAMP1 found in peripheral tissues (Fig 1). However, infiltration of peripheral immune cells in the cerebellum of these mice has not been observed [30], suggesting that this peripheral glycosylation pattern is present in brain resident cells. LAMP2 and LIMP2 did not appear to have hyperglycosylated forms demonstrating that the differential glycosylation appeared to be specific for LAMP1 only.

Our immunofluorescence (IF) analysis showed LAMP1 was predominantly colocalized with activated microglia in Npc1-/- cerebella (Fig 5A), although there was some staining in GFAP positive reactive astrocytes (Fig 5C). This observation was validated by immunoprecipitation (IP) and FACS analysis of microglia from Npc1-/- cerebella and suggests that the hyperglycosylated LAMP1 that appears in the Npc1-/- CNS around the same time as Purkinje neuron degeneration, is present on the surface of activated microglia during neuro-inflammation. Microglia are brain resident immune cells that originate from the yolk sac during development [39]. It is therefore not surprising to find hyperglycosylated LAMP1 present in these cells (Fig 6 and S5 Fig), as they originate from a peripheral tissue. In addition, recent work by our group observed that Lamp1, but not Lamp2, is significantly upregulated (Log2Fold, 1.08; Padj 4.66E-15), in activated microglia from Npc1-/- mice [30]. This is in contrast to microarray data showing reduced expression of Lamp1 in the whole cerebellum of Npc1-/- mice [40, 41]. These results suggest that LAMP1 may play a unique role in the neuro-inflammatory process of NPC. The lack of hyperglycosylated LAMP1 in affected CNS tissues from other mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases that exhibit neuro-inflammation renders our observation specific to NPC, suggesting a unique function associated with this protein in the context of NPC (Fig 7). Treatment of Npc1-/- mice with HPβCD every 3 days starting at day of life 21 prevented the appearance of hyperglycosylated LAMP1, while treatment every 3 days for 2 weeks starting at day of life 49, after disease onset, did not appear to have a significant effect. These results suggest that it is important to start treatment early prior to disease phenotype onset for the treatment to have the best outcome. In human tissues, we did observe an increased level of hyperglycosylated LAMP1 in NPC1 cerebellar samples compared to age-matched control tissue. This is consistent with the activation of microglia observed in human NPC1 brain tissue [42]. We explored the potential of using hyperglycosylated LAMP1 as a CSF biomarker; however, we did not observe any significant differences between control and NPC1 CSF (S7 Fig).

In summary, our work has provided insight into the role that complex glycosylation on LAMP1 may play in NPC disease progression. Our finding highlights two possible modes by which this may occur; 1) through the interaction and signaling of LAMP1 on the surface of activated microglia and 2) through the change in the complex nature of glycosylation of LAMP1 in CNS cells. Further studies designed to address these questions are underway.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Size estimation of mouse CNS LAMP1.

(A) Western blot of total cerebellar extract of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice for LAMP1 (green) and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) (upper red). Actin was used as a loading control.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is composed of complex N-glycans.

(A) LAMP1 Western blot of 9-week Npc1−/− olfactory bulb (OB) and hippocampus (Hippo) lysate, treated with (+) and without (-) Endo H. (B) LAMP1 Western blot of 9-week Npc1+/+ pancreas (Panc) and spleen lysate, treated with (+) and without (-) Endo H.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Immunofluorescence microscopy of midline sagittal cerebellar section of 9-week Npc1+/+ mice.

Low magnification image of the whole cerebellar section stained with LAMP1 (red). Arrowheads indicate positive staining of the Purkinje cell layer. Granule cell layer (GCL); Molecular layer (ML).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Immunofluorescence microscopy of midline sagittal cerebellar section of 9-week Npc1+/+ and Npc1-/- mice.

Higher magnification image of a lobule of Npc1+/+ (A) and Npc1-/- (B) stained with LAMP1 (red). A. Arrows indicate positive LAMP1 staining of the Purkinje cell layer (closed arrows: Purkinje neuron soma; open arrows: other LAMP1 positive cells). B. LAMP1 staining is more disordered in the Purkinje cell layer of Npc1-/- cerebellum and has strong staining in the molecular layer. Granule cell layer (GCL); Molecular layer (ML).

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Hyperglycosylated Npc2−/− LAMP1 is also present predominantly in microglia.

(A & B) LAMP1 Western blot of cell lysates from 16-week-old Npc2+/- and Npc2−/− mouse cerebella that underwent tissue dissociation and subsequent CD11b (microglia) or ASCA-2 (astrocyte) immunoprecipitation. (A) Lanes show the un-bound (UB) and bound (B) fractions of CD11b immunoprecipitation. (B) Lanes show the un-bound (UB) and bound (B) fractions of ASCA2 immunoprecipitation. Glutamine synthase (GS) and Glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP).

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Microglial LAMP1 is hyperglycosylated.

LAMP1 Western blot of microglia cell lysate treated with LPS or PBS (vehicle control).

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is not detected in NPC1 patient CSF.

A. Western blot of LAMP1 in CSF of NPC1 patient (lower panel) and adult healthy controls (upper panel). Coomassie Blue stain (indicated) was used to normalize LAMP1 to total protein. The LAMP1 band intensity was quantified and standardized to the total protein signal in the whole respective lane. B. The LAMP1 total protein ratios (mean +/- SD) for NPC1 patients and healthy controls is graphed to the right of the Western blots.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Cristin Davidson, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, for generating the ASM mouse tissue. We would also like to thank the NHLBI flow cytometry and the NICHD microscopy core facilities for assistance with the microglia and astrocyte isolation, and confocal microscopy, respectively. We would also like to express our appreciation to our clinical team who contributed to both the Natural History and phase 1/2a study and helped provide patient samples. Finally, we would like to express our appreciation to the guardians and patients who have participated in our clinical trials.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Funding for this work was from the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

References

  • 1.Sarna JR, Larouche M, Marzban H, Sillitoe RV, Rancourt DE, Hawkes R. Patterned Purkinje cell degeneration in mouse models of Niemann-Pick type C disease. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2003;456(3):279–91. 10.1002/cne.10522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vanier MT. Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2010;5:16 10.1186/1750-1172-5-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Infante RE, Wang ML, Radhakrishnan A, Kwon HJ, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. NPC2 facilitates bidirectional transfer of cholesterol between NPC1 and lipid bilayers, a step in cholesterol egress from lysosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(40):15287–92. 10.1073/pnas.0807328105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kwon HJ, Abi-Mosleh L, Wang ML, Deisenhofer J, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, et al. Structure of N-terminal domain of NPC1 reveals distinct subdomains for binding and transfer of cholesterol. Cell. 2009;137(7):1213–24. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carstea ED, Morris JA, Coleman KG, Loftus SK, Zhang D, Cummings C, et al. Niemann-Pick C1 disease gene: homology to mediators of cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1997;277(5323):228–31. 10.1126/science.277.5323.228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Friedland N, Liou HL, Lobel P, Stock AM. Structure of a cholesterol-binding protein deficient in Niemann-Pick type C2 disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(5):2512–7. 10.1073/pnas.0437840100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deffieu MS, Pfeffer SR. Niemann-Pick type C 1 function requires lumenal domain residues that mediate cholesterol-dependent NPC2 binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(47):18932–6. 10.1073/pnas.1110439108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li J, Deffieu MS, Lee PL, Saha P, Pfeffer SR. Glycosylation inhibition reduces cholesterol accumulation in NPC1 protein-deficient cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112(48):14876–81. 10.1073/pnas.1520490112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kosicek M, Gudelj I, Horvatic A, Jovic T, Vuckovic F, Lauc G, et al. N-glycome of the Lysosomal Glycocalyx is Altered in Niemann-Pick Type C Disease (NPC) Model Cells. Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2018;17(4):631–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fukuda M. Lysosomal membrane glycoproteins. Structure, biosynthesis, and intracellular trafficking. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1991;266(32):21327–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eskelinen EL. Roles of LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 in lysosome biogenesis and autophagy. Molecular aspects of medicine. 2006;27(5–6):495–502. 10.1016/j.mam.2006.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huynh KK, Eskelinen EL, Scott CC, Malevanets A, Saftig P, Grinstein S. LAMP proteins are required for fusion of lysosomes with phagosomes. The EMBO journal. 2007;26(2):313–24. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eskelinen EL, Tanaka Y, Saftig P. At the acidic edge: emerging functions for lysosomal membrane proteins. Trends in cell biology. 2003;13(3):137–45. 10.1016/s0962-8924(03)00005-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kundra R, Kornfeld S. Asparagine-linked oligosaccharides protect Lamp-1 and Lamp-2 from intracellular proteolysis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274(43):31039–46. 10.1074/jbc.274.43.31039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schwake M, Schroder B, Saftig P. Lysosomal membrane proteins and their central role in physiology. Traffic. 2013;14(7):739–48. 10.1111/tra.12056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Andrejewski N, Punnonen EL, Guhde G, Tanaka Y, Lullmann-Rauch R, Hartmann D, et al. Normal lysosomal morphology and function in LAMP-1-deficient mice. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274(18):12692–701. 10.1074/jbc.274.18.12692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nishino I, Fu J, Tanji K, Yamada T, Shimojo S, Koori T, et al. Primary LAMP-2 deficiency causes X-linked vacuolar cardiomyopathy and myopathy (Danon disease). Nature. 2000;406(6798):906–10. 10.1038/35022604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rothaug M, Stroobants S, Schweizer M, Peters J, Zunke F, Allerding M, et al. LAMP-2 deficiency leads to hippocampal dysfunction but normal clearance of neuronal substrates of chaperone-mediated autophagy in a mouse model for Danon disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:6 10.1186/s40478-014-0182-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Eskelinen EL, Schmidt CK, Neu S, Willenborg M, Fuertes G, Salvador N, et al. Disturbed cholesterol traffic but normal proteolytic function in LAMP-1/LAMP-2 double-deficient fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(7):3132–45. 10.1091/mbc.E04-02-0103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li D, Li Y, Wu X, Li Q, Yu J, Gen J, et al. Knockdown of Mgat5 inhibits breast cancer cell growth with activation of CD4+ T cells and macrophages. Journal of immunology. 2008;180(5):3158–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Van den Steen P, Rudd PM, Dwek RA, Opdenakker G. Concepts and principles of O-linked glycosylation. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology. 1998;33(3):151–208. 10.1080/10409239891204198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chung C, Elrick MJ, Dell'Orco JM, Qin ZS, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Chinnaiyan AM, et al. Heat Shock Protein Beta-1 Modifies Anterior to Posterior Purkinje Cell Vulnerability in a Mouse Model of Niemann-Pick Type C Disease. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(5):e1006042 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ohshima T, Murray GJ, Swaim WD, Longenecker G, Quirk JM, Cardarelli CO, et al. alpha-Galactosidase A deficient mice: a model of Fabry disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(6):2540–4. 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Micsenyi MC, Dobrenis K, Stephney G, Pickel J, Vanier MT, Slaugenhaupt SA, et al. Neuropathology of the Mcoln1(-/-) knockout mouse model of mucolipidosis type IV. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology. 2009;68(2):125–35. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181942cf0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yoshida Y, Yoshimi R, Yoshii H, Kim D, Dey A, Xiong H, et al. The transcription factor IRF8 activates integrin-mediated TGF-beta signaling and promotes neuroinflammation. Immunity. 2014;40(2):187–98. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sango K, Yamanaka S, Hoffmann A, Okuda Y, Grinberg A, Westphal H, et al. Mouse models of Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases differ in neurologic phenotype and ganglioside metabolism. Nat Genet. 1995;11(2):170–6. 10.1038/ng1095-170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sarafian V, Jadot M, Foidart JM, Letesson JJ, Van den Brule F, Castronovo V, et al. Expression of Lamp-1 and Lamp-2 and their interactions with galectin-3 in human tumor cells. International journal of cancer. 1998;75(1):105–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carlsson SR, Fukuda M. The lysosomal membrane glycoprotein lamp-1 is transported to lysosomes by two alternative pathways. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 1992;296(2):630–9. 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90619-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krishnan V, Bane SM, Kawle PD, Naresh KN, Kalraiya RD. Altered melanoma cell surface glycosylation mediates organ specific adhesion and metastasis via lectin receptors on the lung vascular endothelium. Clinical & experimental metastasis. 2005;22(1):11–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cougnoux A, Drummond RA, Collar AL, Iben JR, Salman A, Westgarth H, et al. Microglia activation in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 is amendable to therapeutic intervention. Human molecular genetics. 2018;27(12):2076–89. 10.1093/hmg/ddy112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen FW, Gordon RE, Ioannou YA. NPC1 late endosomes contain elevated levels of non-esterified ('free') fatty acids and an abnormally glycosylated form of the NPC2 protein. Biochem J. 2005;390(Pt 2):549–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Klein A, Amigo L, Retamal MJ, Morales MG, Miquel JF, Rigotti A, et al. NPC2 is expressed in human and murine liver and secreted into bile: potential implications for body cholesterol homeostasis. Hepatology. 2006;43(1):126–33. 10.1002/hep.20985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chua CC, Lim ML, Wong BS. Altered apolipoprotein E glycosylation is associated with Abeta(42) accumulation in an animal model of Niemann-Pick Type C disease. J Neurochem. 2010;112(6):1619–26. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06586.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li J, Pfeffer SR. Lysosomal membrane glycoproteins bind cholesterol and contribute to lysosomal cholesterol export. Elife. 2016;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Singhal A, Szente L, Hildreth JEK, Song B. Hydroxypropyl-beta and -gamma cyclodextrins rescue cholesterol accumulation in Niemann-Pick C1 mutant cell via lysosome-associated membrane protein 1. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(10):1019 10.1038/s41419-018-1056-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lopez ME, Klein AD, Dimbil UJ, Scott MP. Anatomically defined neuron-based rescue of neurodegenerative Niemann-Pick type C disorder. J Neurosci. 2011;31(12):4367–78. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5981-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yu T, Shakkottai VG, Chung C, Lieberman AP. Temporal and cell-specific deletion establishes that neuronal Npc1 deficiency is sufficient to mediate neurodegeneration. Human molecular genetics. 2011;20(22):4440–51. 10.1093/hmg/ddr372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Caporali P, Bruno F, Palladino G, Dragotto J, Petrosini L, Mangia F, et al. Developmental delay in motor skill acquisition in Niemann-Pick C1 mice reveals abnormal cerebellar morphogenesis. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4(1):94 10.1186/s40478-016-0370-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gomez Perdiguero E, Klapproth K, Schulz C, Busch K, Azzoni E, Crozet L, et al. Tissue-resident macrophages originate from yolk-sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors. Nature. 2015;518(7540):547–51. 10.1038/nature13989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liao G, Wen Z, Irizarry K, Huang Y, Mitsouras K, Darmani M, et al. Abnormal gene expression in cerebellum of Npc1-/- mice during postnatal development. Brain Res. 2010;1325:128–40. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vazquez MC, del Pozo T, Robledo FA, Carrasco G, Pavez L, Olivares F, et al. Alteration of gene expression profile in Niemann-Pick type C mice correlates with tissue damage and oxidative stress. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28777 10.1371/journal.pone.0028777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cologna SM, Cluzeau CV, Yanjanin NM, Blank PS, Dail MK, Siebel S, et al. Human and mouse neuroinflammation markers in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2014;37(1):83–92. 10.1007/s10545-013-9610-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Andrea Dardis

20 Sep 2019

PONE-D-19-23845

Abnormal LAMP1 glycosylation may play a role in Niemann-Pick disease, type C pathology

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Porter,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

In particular, some loading and purity controls are missing and must be included.

The images in Fig 4 and 5 are poor quality, must be improved.

Please include the information requested by reviewer 2 in the materials and methods section.

Some conclusions are not fully supported by data; therefore, they should be re-elaborated or further data should be provided.

The discussion can be improved by re-phrasing some sentences and discussing data already published, showing altered glycosylated proteins in NPC.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Nov 04 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andrea Dardis, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript Cawley et al. show an altered glycosylation pattern of LAMP-1 which correlates with disease pathology. In many figures loading controls are missing and should be included (details below). The findings are interesting and support previous studies showing altered glycosylated patterns in NPC. Some relevant papers have been discussed; however other key papers must be included in the discussion. For instance, it has been shown that NPC2 is overexpressed in Npc1-/- cells and tissues and present changes in glycosylation patterns (PMID: 15896196, PMID: 16374838). Furthermore, ApoE also shows altered glycosylation patter in NPC (PMID: 20070866).

To facilitate the understanding of the article, some changes are suggested:

Figure1:

Figure 1A doesn’t add much information, it can be supplementary.

Figure 1B: Loading control is missing.

An interesting question that the authors can address is how is LAMP-1 overexpressed? Is it transcriptionally regulated? This can be easily analyzed by q-PCR analysis and would complement the Figure 1B.

Figure 2:

If actin is added to Figure 2B, then 2A doesn’t add any info. It is highly recommended to add loading controls.

Figures 4 and 5: Both Figures should be merged. High magnification images are necessary. The images shown in supplementary Fig 2S are more informative than the currently shown in fig 4. Please replace them and show comparative images for Npc1-/- tissues.

Figure 6: Nice idea; however, some controls are missing. A control showing the purity of the isolations is necessary, similarly to what is shown in Fig 3S. In addition to GFAP a microglial marker should be analyzed (CD11b or others)

Figure 7: nice work here, Actin is missing in Fig 7C.

Reviewer #2: This study identifies and characterizes the presence of a high level of glycosylated form of LAMP1 in the cerebellum and other brain regions of Niemann Pick C1 mice. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 appears to be associated to disease progression and is rescued by the treatment with HPβCD started at pre-symptomatic stages of the disease. Interestingly, a glycosylated form of LAMP1 is also observed in cerebellar samples obtained from NPC patients, but not in those obtained from patients affected by different neurodegenerative diseases.

In addition, the study provides evidence that this post-translationally modified form of LAMP1 is linked to microglia-mediated neuroinflammation.

Experiments presented are well conceived and data provided add a novel and relevant contribution to the knowledge of pathogenic mechanisms of the NPC disease. There are, however, some criticisms that the authors should address to strengthen the major findings of their study.

Specific issues.

Figure 1. Given that the estimated MW of the brain form of LAMP1 is ≈ 75 kDa, the lack of a MW reference standard near this range size appears a bit peculiar. An additional reference standard between 62 and 98 kDa would strengthen this estimate.

The authors discuss the findings displayed by panel B in terms of quantitative variation of protein abundance. However, this inference is not circumstantiated with loading controls.

Figure 2. Western blot displayed in panel B and quantitative analyses of panel C refer to protein extracted from anterior, middle and posterior part of the cerebellum. However, no detail is given on how these compartments were separated one from each other (i.e. which lobules were included in each region?). The procedure should be described under materials and methods.

Figure 3 (A, B). The treatment with N-Glycanase and EndoH appears to be accompanied by a sensible decrease of protein abundance, as suggested by the weaker intensity of bands corresponding to treated extract loadings. The authors should comment on this. It might depend on antibody affinity for modified/unmodified protein forms, respectively. Once again, loading controls are missing, whereas their presence would contribute to clarify this issue.

Figure 4. LAMP1 immunostaining of panel B is consistent with the presence of LAMP1 in Bergmann glia (BG), as stated by the authors. However the merged picture shown in panel C, does not properly represent this feature, showing a very faint and sparse red staining (LAMP1) that is masked by the strong Calbindin staining of Purkinje cells (PC), perhaps. This is somehow inconsistent with the picture displayed by panel A of Fig. 5, which clearly shows the presence of LAMP1 in PC somata. To my opinion, information of Figure 4 is somehow redundant in light of data displayed in Fig. 5.

Figure 5. Cerebellar lobules displayed in the various panels are not comparable, whereas the typical spatiotemporal spread out of the NPC disease within the cerebellum makes this issue worth of careful attention. I strongly encourage the authors to consistently select the same/similar (anterior, middle, posterior) lobules for displaying.

The statement: “There was weak co-staining with GFAP, a marker of reactive astrocytes”, is only partly correct, since GFAP also stains Bergmann glia (BG). Noteworthy, besides astrocytosis, previous studies have reported a number of anomalies of BG in mouse models of NPC since early stages of the disease. In light of the presence of LAMP1 in BG of wild-type mice, the sparse/decreased LAMP1 presence in BG of NPC mice could be a sign of the disease. This possibility should be taken into account by the authors.

Figure 6. The emphasis that the authors deserve to the intermediate sized LAMP1, to my opinion, is not supported by the poor definition of this band.

Minor points

The discussion is a bit too long and the overall readability of the manuscript can be improved by re-phrasing some sentences. As an example, see: “The disease is autosomal recessive, where patients………….to other cellular organelles”.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Andres D Klein

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0227829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227829.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Dec 2019

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript Cawley et al. show an altered glycosylation pattern of LAMP-1 which correlates with disease pathology. In many figures loading controls are missing and should be included (details below). The findings are interesting and support previous studies showing altered glycosylated patterns in NPC. Some relevant papers have been discussed; however other key papers must be included in the discussion. For instance, it has been shown that NPC2 is overexpressed in Npc1-/- cells and tissues and present changes in glycosylation patterns (PMID: 15896196, PMID: 16374838). Furthermore, ApoE also shows altered glycosylation patter in NPC (PMID: 20070866).

Thank you for reviewing our paper. Our apologies for omitting several papers. We have now included them and integrated their information in the Discussion section (lines 428-436).

To facilitate the understanding of the article, some changes are suggested:

Figure1:

Figure 1A doesn’t add much information, it can be supplementary. We are not aware of any previously reported specific size determination of LAMP1 in different brain regions of the mouse. When we first performed the Western blot, we were surprised to see it so “small” compared to the size reported in most of the literature, which usually describes the peripheral form of LAMP1. A smaller LAMP1 sized band was seen in the original LAMP1 KO paper, but it’s size was not discussed and was only used as a control. We would therefore like to keep this part of Fig 1 as is, since it represents a clear size distinction between peripheral and CNS LAMP1 that may be related to function.

Figure 1B: Loading control is missing. We have added the blot probed for actin as a loading control. This blot has now been added to the Fig 1B.

An interesting question that the authors can address is how is LAMP-1 overexpressed? Is it transcriptionally regulated? This can be easily analyzed by q-PCR analysis and would complement the Figure 1B. This is a good question but has been addressed previously by us and others as part of microarray and RNA-seq datasets. Specifically, Liao et al, (PMC2848886) showed a slight reduction (Log2(FC) = -0.071) of LAMP1 in 3 week old Npc1-/- cerebellum versus Npc1+/+. In addition, Vasquez et al, (PMC3245218) found it to be significantly reduced (log2(FC) = -2.12) in the cerebellum of 7-8 weeks old Npc1-/- mice compared to Npc1+/+. Our previous RNA-seq data (Cougnoux et al, PMC5985727) showed that LAMP1 mRNA was increased ~2-fold in microglia from the cerebellum of Npc1-/- mice compared to Npc1+/+ (log2(FC) = 1.08). These data suggest an overall reduction in LAMP1 mRNA expression in Npc1-/- in the cerebellar tissue but with a specific increase in the microglia. We have now included this information in the Discussion (lines 496-499).

Figure 2:

If actin is added to Figure 2B, then 2A doesn’t add any info. It is highly recommended to add loading controls. Unfortunately, we do not have these samples for 2B anymore. The blot in Fig 2B was meant as a representative blot to visualize the bands. However, the complete data reported in the bar graph is a measure of the ratio of the two bands within each lane and hence are normalized within the lane. In the absence of these samples to re-run, we hope our justification is acceptable to have the figure stand as is.

Figures 4 and 5: Both Figures should be merged. High magnification images are necessary. The images shown in supplementary Fig 2S are more informative than the currently shown in fig 4. Please replace them and show comparative images for Npc1-/- tissues. As requested, we have now repeated the IHC and analyzed it by confocal microscopy and have included comparative images for Npc1-/-. The high magnification confocal images of LAMP1 with Calbindin (Purkinje cells) or S100��(Bergmann glia) in control and Npc1-/- mice (lobule I) is now new figure 4. We have placed the old figure 4 (low magnification of the whole cerebellum staining of LAMP1) as the new supplementary figure 3. In addition, we placed the higher magnification image of LAMP1 staining only (part of old figure 4) as new supplemental figure 4.

We have also modified Figure 5 to include only co-staining of Iba, Olig2 and GFAP with LAMP1 (since calbindin and S100� is now presented in new figure 4). We felt that merging both figure 4 and 5 would make the figure too complex and we would like to keep it as 2 separate figures. We hope that this layout is acceptable to the reviewer.

Figure 6: Nice idea; however, some controls are missing. A control showing the purity of the isolations is necessary, similarly to what is shown in Fig 3S. In addition to GFAP a microglial marker should be analyzed (CD11b or others). We have now repeated the microglia purification and analyzed the bound and unbound fractions from both Npc1+/+ and Npc1-/- cerebella. We probed for CD11b and confirmed that all the CD11b staining was in the bound fraction. Analysis for an astrocyte marker, glutamine synthase (GS), showed the opposite i.e. all GS was recovered in the unbound fraction and none in the bound fraction. The hyper-glycosylated LAMP1 was recovered almost exclusively in the bound fraction consistent with its presence in microglia.

We have modified the figure to focus on the microglia purification only and have modified the text. We did not repeat the astrocyte purification because the GLAST antigen used to pull down the cells is susceptible to papain treatment used for the cell dissociation and it would not work with the current Miltenyi IP kit. However, the supplementary figure 5 showing purification of astrocytes from Npc2 mouse cerebella demonstrates that the hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is not present in these cells.

Figure 7: nice work here, Actin is missing in Fig 7C. We have re-run these samples and included �-actin as a loading control. This blot has now been added to the Fig 7C.

Reviewer #2: This study identifies and characterizes the presence of a high level of glycosylated form of LAMP1 in the cerebellum and other brain regions of Niemann Pick C1 mice. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 appears to be associated to disease progression and is rescued by the treatment with HPβCD started at pre-symptomatic stages of the disease. Interestingly, a glycosylated form of LAMP1 is also observed in cerebellar samples obtained from NPC patients, but not in those obtained from patients affected by different neurodegenerative diseases.

In addition, the study provides evidence that this post-translationally modified form of LAMP1 is linked to microglia-mediated neuroinflammation.

Experiments presented are well conceived and data provided add a novel and relevant contribution to the knowledge of pathogenic mechanisms of the NPC disease. There are, however, some criticisms that the authors should address to strengthen the major findings of their study.

We thank you for taking the time to assess our work. We have addressed your comments and made the changes where necessary. Please see below.

Specific issues.

Figure 1. Given that the estimated MW of the brain form of LAMP1 is ≈ 75 kDa, the lack of a MW reference standard near this range size appears a bit peculiar. An additional reference standard between 62 and 98 kDa would strengthen this estimate. Thank you, yes, this is more accurate. We have now re-run several samples and probed the blot for Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70). This 70kDa HSP70 band is clearly above the 62kDa marker but still slightly below the brain form of LAMP1. While the accuracy of the mini-gels in this region of the gel has its limits we believe that assessing the brain form of LAMP1 as approximately 75 kDa is reasonable. We have included this blot as part of the Supplementary information (S1 Fig) and have referred to it in the main text (line 242-243).

The authors discuss the findings displayed by panel B in terms of quantitative variation of protein abundance. However, this inference is not circumstantiated with loading controls. We have re-run these samples and probed for �-tubulin as a loading control. The blot shows similar protein loaded per lane and has now been added to the Fig 1B.

Figure 2. Western blot displayed in panel B and quantitative analyses of panel C refer to protein extracted from anterior, middle and posterior part of the cerebellum. However, no detail is given on how these compartments were separated one from each other (i.e. which lobules were included in each region?). The procedure should be described under materials and methods. Our apologies for the oversight. Lobules I to V were dissected as anterior, IV to VIII as middle and IX and X as posterior. The procedure has now been added to the Methods section of the manuscript (line 124-128).

Figure 3 (A, B). The treatment with N-Glycanase and EndoH appears to be accompanied by a sensible decrease of protein abundance, as suggested by the weaker intensity of bands corresponding to treated extract loadings. The authors should comment on this. It might depend on antibody affinity for modified/unmodified protein forms, respectively. Once again, loading controls are missing, whereas their presence would contribute to clarify this issue. We agree with the reviewer. In addition to antibody affinity as suggested, we cannot rule out the low levels of protease activity present that may have contributed to the lower recovery. In addition, the loss due to sticking to the tube (of the deglycosylated form) after the long incubation time may contribute. However, our focus for this experiment was qualitative rather than quantitative. To that end, the qualitative shift in size is strong evidence of its unique N-linked glycosylation nature. As requested, we have commented on this in the manuscript as requested (line 291-292).

Figure 4. LAMP1 immunostaining of panel B is consistent with the presence of LAMP1 in Bergmann glia (BG), as stated by the authors. However the merged picture shown in panel C, does not properly represent this feature, showing a very faint and sparse red staining (LAMP1) that is masked by the strong Calbindin staining of Purkinje cells (PC), perhaps. This is somehow inconsistent with the picture displayed by panel A of Fig. 5, which clearly shows the presence of LAMP1 in PC somata. To my opinion, information of Figure 4 is somehow redundant in light of data displayed in Fig. 5. As requested by reviewer 1 and from your comments here, we have now repeated the IHC by confocal microscopy and have made a new figure 4 to include Calbindin/LAMP1 and S100b/LAMP1 in control and Npc1-/- mice. We have also rearranged some images to supplementary for clarity. The results are consistent with our previous data, but it also clarifies for us that other cells present are staining with LAMP1 and not calbindin or S100b. We have included this in the results (lines 309-315) section.

Figure 5. Cerebellar lobules displayed in the various panels are not comparable, whereas the typical spatiotemporal spread out of the NPC disease within the cerebellum makes this issue worth of careful attention. I strongly encourage the authors to consistently select the same/similar (anterior, middle, posterior) lobules for displaying. We have now identified and labelled the lobules shown in the panels of Fig 5. In general, our goal was to focus on the LAMP1 staining in Npc1-/- in the context of other known cells present. In this case the images shown primarily contained lobules 4/5 for oligodendrocyte, astrocytes, microglia.

The statement: “There was weak co-staining with GFAP, a marker of reactive astrocytes”, is only partly correct, since GFAP also stains Bergmann glia (BG). Noteworthy, besides astrocytosis, previous studies have reported a number of anomalies of BG in mouse models of NPC since early stages of the disease. In light of the presence of LAMP1 in BG of wild-type mice, the sparse/decreased LAMP1 presence in BG of NPC mice could be a sign of the disease. This possibility should be taken into account by the authors. We agree with the reviewer’s suggestion and have changed the sentence to include “a marker of reactive astrocytes including Bergmann glia” (line 327-328). As requested by reviewer 1, we performed confocal microscopy for calbindin/LAMP1 and s100b/LAMP1 on both control and mutant mice. We do not know why LAMP1 is so concentrated in Purkinje cells (PCs) and Bergmann glia (and possibly other cells) in the PC layer of control mice; nor about its contribution to the disease in these cells. We cannot really say that LAMP1 staining (or lack) in BG may be a sign of the disease. Our focus in this paper with respect to LAMP1 was the microglia, however, in light of the poor morphological differentiation and function of BG (Caporali et al, 2016, Acta Neuropathol Commun), we have included a comment in the text about BG function (lines 477-481).

Figure 6. The emphasis that the authors deserve to the intermediate sized LAMP1, to my opinion, is not supported by the poor definition of this band. We agree with the reviewer and have removed all references to this observation.

Minor points

The discussion is a bit too long and the overall readability of the manuscript can be improved by re-phrasing some sentences. As an example, see: “The disease is autosomal recessive, where patients………….to other cellular organelles”. We have now edited the manuscript and Discussion to be more readable. We have removed the second last paragraph discussing the possible idea about the poly-LacNAc moieties as this is all speculation. However, reviewer 1 requested we add something about other glycosylated proteins in NPC. In all we have reduced the length of the Discussion.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers-LAMP1 paper FDP.docx

Decision Letter 1

Andrea Dardis

31 Dec 2019

Abnormal LAMP1 glycosylation may play a role in Niemann-Pick disease, type C pathology

PONE-D-19-23845R1

Dear Dr. Porter,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Andrea Dardis, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The new figures have made the manuscript much better than the first one.

All the comments were property addressed.

Happy Holidays!

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Andres D Klein

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Andrea Dardis

14 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-23845R1

Abnormal LAMP1 glycosylation may play a role in Niemann-Pick disease, type C pathology

Dear Dr. Porter:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Andrea Dardis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Size estimation of mouse CNS LAMP1.

    (A) Western blot of total cerebellar extract of Npc1+/+ and Npc1−/− mice for LAMP1 (green) and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) (upper red). Actin was used as a loading control.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is composed of complex N-glycans.

    (A) LAMP1 Western blot of 9-week Npc1−/− olfactory bulb (OB) and hippocampus (Hippo) lysate, treated with (+) and without (-) Endo H. (B) LAMP1 Western blot of 9-week Npc1+/+ pancreas (Panc) and spleen lysate, treated with (+) and without (-) Endo H.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Immunofluorescence microscopy of midline sagittal cerebellar section of 9-week Npc1+/+ mice.

    Low magnification image of the whole cerebellar section stained with LAMP1 (red). Arrowheads indicate positive staining of the Purkinje cell layer. Granule cell layer (GCL); Molecular layer (ML).

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Immunofluorescence microscopy of midline sagittal cerebellar section of 9-week Npc1+/+ and Npc1-/- mice.

    Higher magnification image of a lobule of Npc1+/+ (A) and Npc1-/- (B) stained with LAMP1 (red). A. Arrows indicate positive LAMP1 staining of the Purkinje cell layer (closed arrows: Purkinje neuron soma; open arrows: other LAMP1 positive cells). B. LAMP1 staining is more disordered in the Purkinje cell layer of Npc1-/- cerebellum and has strong staining in the molecular layer. Granule cell layer (GCL); Molecular layer (ML).

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Hyperglycosylated Npc2−/− LAMP1 is also present predominantly in microglia.

    (A & B) LAMP1 Western blot of cell lysates from 16-week-old Npc2+/- and Npc2−/− mouse cerebella that underwent tissue dissociation and subsequent CD11b (microglia) or ASCA-2 (astrocyte) immunoprecipitation. (A) Lanes show the un-bound (UB) and bound (B) fractions of CD11b immunoprecipitation. (B) Lanes show the un-bound (UB) and bound (B) fractions of ASCA2 immunoprecipitation. Glutamine synthase (GS) and Glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP).

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Microglial LAMP1 is hyperglycosylated.

    LAMP1 Western blot of microglia cell lysate treated with LPS or PBS (vehicle control).

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Hyperglycosylated LAMP1 is not detected in NPC1 patient CSF.

    A. Western blot of LAMP1 in CSF of NPC1 patient (lower panel) and adult healthy controls (upper panel). Coomassie Blue stain (indicated) was used to normalize LAMP1 to total protein. The LAMP1 band intensity was quantified and standardized to the total protein signal in the whole respective lane. B. The LAMP1 total protein ratios (mean +/- SD) for NPC1 patients and healthy controls is graphed to the right of the Western blots.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers-LAMP1 paper FDP.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES