Abstract
Frequent transitions of bacterial pathogens between their warm-blooded host and external reservoirs are accompanied by abrupt temperature shifts. A temperature of 37°C serves as reliable signal for ingestion by a mammalian host, which induces a major reprogramming of bacterial gene expression and metabolism. Enteric Yersiniae are Gram-negative pathogens accountable for self-limiting gastrointestinal infections. Among the temperature-regulated virulence genes of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is cnfY coding for the cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNFY), a multifunctional secreted toxin that modulates the host’s innate immune system and contributes to the decision between acute infection and persistence. We report that the major determinant of temperature-regulated cnfY expression is a thermo-labile RNA structure in the 5’-untranslated region (5’-UTR). Various translational gene fusions demonstrated that this region faithfully regulates translation initiation regardless of the transcription start site, promoter or reporter strain. RNA structure probing revealed a labile stem-loop structure, in which the ribosome binding site is partially occluded at 25°C but liberated at 37°C. Consistent with translational control in bacteria, toeprinting (primer extension inhibition) experiments in vitro showed increased ribosome binding at elevated temperature. Point mutations locking the 5’-UTR in its 25°C structure impaired opening of the stem loop, ribosome access and translation initiation at 37°C. To assess the in vivo relevance of temperature control, we used a mouse infection model. Y. pseudotuberculosis strains carrying stabilized RNA thermometer variants upstream of cnfY were avirulent and attenuated in their ability to disseminate into mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen. We conclude with a model, in which the RNA thermometer acts as translational roadblock in a two-layered regulatory cascade that tightly controls provision of the CNFY toxin during acute infection. Similar RNA structures upstream of various cnfY homologs suggest that RNA thermosensors dictate the production of secreted toxins in a wide range of pathogens.
Author summary
Bacterial pathogens closely survey the ambient conditions and induce virulence genes only at appropriate conditions. Upon host contact, many pathogens secrete toxins in order to subvert host defense systems. We find that such a secreted toxin in enteropathogenic Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is produced only at host body temperature. This regulation depends on a temperature-responsive RNA structure, an RNA thermometer, in the 5’-untranslated region of the toxin mRNA, which prevents translation at low temperatures when the bacterium is outside the host. Preventing melting of the RNA structure at 37°C by nucleotide substitutions that stabilize base pairing resulted in avirulent Yersinia strains unable to infect mice. Given that similar RNA thermometer-like structures exist upstream of related toxin genes in various bacterial pathogens, we propose that RNA thermometer-mediated toxin production is an evolutionary conserved mechanism. Interfering with opening of such regulatory structures might thus be a promising strategy targeting a broad spectrum of bacterial pathogens.
Introduction
Throughout their infection cycle, bacterial pathogens encounter changing nutritional and physical conditions. To withstand these potentially harmful cues, pathogens constantly monitor multiple external and internal parameters. Temperature is among the most important signals upon entry into or exit from the host and induces profound changes in gene expression and metabolism [1]. Bacterial pathogens have evolved diverse signal transduction cascades that adjust gene expression as soon as they are confronted with elevated temperatures (37°C) in the warm-blooded host. Such a shift in temperature has an impact on almost any biomolecule. For example, it influences the activity or conformation of proteins and their interaction with membrane lipids. Moreover, it can affect the spatial arrangement of DNA and the structure of RNA [1–4]. The latter is particularly relevant in RNA thermometers (RNATs) that rearrange their structure in a temperature-dependent manner and thereby control translation efficiency. They are found in the 5’-untranslated region (5’-UTR) or intercistronic regions (ICRs) of many bacterial mRNAs [5,6]. At low temperatures, a secondary structure occludes the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence and/or the translation initiation codon leading to inhibition of ribosome binding and, ultimately, inhibition of translation. An increase in ambient temperature provokes a gradual melting of the secondary structure, which liberates the ribosome-binding site (RBS) enabling translation initiation. Because of their instantaneous and reversible zipper-like control mechanism, RNATs are well-suited to adjust expression of virulence genes in bacterial pathogens during their infection cycle [7,8].
Besides Yersinia pestis and Yersinia enterocolitica, the Gram-negative γ-proteobacterium Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is one of the three pathogenic species from the genus Yersinia. While infection with Y. pestis, the causative agent of plague, leads to a grave and rapidly progressing febrile illness with severe mortality rates, the enteric foodborne pathogens Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. enterocolitica cause self-limiting gastrointestinal diseases such as enteritis, diarrhea, and mesenteric lymphadenitis [9,10]. To infect target tissues and to survive in them, pathogenic Yersinia species possess an armory of virulence factors. Among these are the type three secretion system (T3SS), the Yersinia outer proteins (Yop effectors), and the adhesin YadA [11], whose genes are tightly controlled in response to extracellular calcium (Ca2+) concentration [12,13] and temperature [14]. Transcription of these virulence genes is activated by the low calcium response regulator (LcrF) which underlies an extensive thermoregulation cascade in Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis [15,16]. An RNAT in the yscW-lcrF intercistronic region plays a key role in this process as it mediates translational control of lcrF expression [15].
Previously, we experimentally mapped the structures of more than 1,750 Y. pseudotuberculosis RNAs by applying the parallel analysis of RNA structure (PARS) method [17] at three physiologically important temperatures. We were particularly interested in Shine-Dalgarno (SD) regions that unfold upon temperature elevation and identified at least 16 new RNATs controlling translation of genes from different functional categories [18]. A virulence-related thermometer candidate was found in the 5’-UTR of cnfY encoding the cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNFY). In contrast to many other cell-targeting Yersinia virulence factors, CNFY is not delivered via the T3SS but through extracellular membrane vesicles [19]. Once inside the host cell, this single-chain A-B toxin modulates the immune response by constitutively activating Rho GTPases and enhancing delivery of Yop effector proteins into target cells [20–22]. CNFY activity ultimately leads to the induction of acute inflammatory responses and to the formation of necrotic areas in infected tissues [20]. Related CNFs were identified in uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains (CNF1-3) as well as in Y. pseudotuberculosis strains YPIII and IP2666 [23,24].
In this study, we characterized the thermoregulatory features of the cnfY RNAT. We show that it forms a new type of structure, which is thermo-labile and allows increased ribosome binding at body temperature. Point mutations that strengthen the anti-SD/SD interaction prevent CNFY production at 37°C. Y. pseudotuberculosis strains carrying such stabilized RNAT variants were avirulent in a mouse model demonstrating the importance of precise temperature sensing for successful host-microbe interactions.
Material and methods
Ethics statement
Animal work was performed in strict accordance with the European Health Recommendations of the Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). The protocol was approved by the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit: animal licensing committee permission no. 33.19-42502-04-18/3034. Animals were treated with appropriate care and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Bacterial strains and plasmids
Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in S1 Table. Cells were grown in LB medium or BHI medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) at indicated temperatures. If required, antibiotics were added to the media at following final concentrations: ampicillin, 100 μg/ml; gentamycin, 10 μg/ml; kanamycin, 50 μg/ml. For the induction of the PBAD promoter the medium was supplemented with L-arabinose to a final concentration of 0.01% (w/v; E. coli) or 0.1% (w/v; Y. pseudotuberculosis). To generate YP216, the kanamycin resistance of strain YP147 was removed as described previously [25].
Plasmid construction
All utilized oligonucleotides and plasmids are summarized in S2 or S3 Tables, respectively. Enzymes for cloning were obtained from Thermo Scientific (St. Leon-Rot, Germany). PCR, DNA manipulations, DNA restrictions, and transformations were performed according to standard protocols [26]. Point mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis according to the instruction manual of the QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). All constructed plasmids were confirmed by restriction analysis and automated sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany).
The cnfY RNAT:gfp fusion plasmid pBO4481 was constructed as follows: Since the cnfY 5’-UTR contains an internal EcoRI restriction site, a 128 bp fragment, including the cnfY 5’-UTR (mutation TT48,49AA, deleting the internal EcoRI site) and 30 bp of the cnfY coding region, was PCR-amplified using primer pair YPK_2615utr_fw/YPK_2615utr_rv and pBO3190 as template. The resulting DNA fragment was ligated into the EcoRI/NheI restriction sites of pBAD2-gfp obtaining pBO4478. Subsequently, the mutation (TT48,49AA) was restored by site-directed mutagenesis using primer pair YPK2615_QC2_fw/YPK2615_QC2_rv, resulting in plasmid pBO4481. Mutations R1 (AG32-33CT), R2 (A29Δ), and R1+2 (ATCAG29-33TCCT) were inserted into pBO4481 by site-directed mutagenesis using primer pairs cnfY_R1_fw/cnfY_R1_rv, cnfY_R2_fw/cnfY_R2_rv, and cnfY_R1+2_fw/cnfY_R1+2_rv generating plasmids pBO6505, pBO6506, and pBO6507, respectively. Plasmid pBAD2-lcrF-gfp (pBO4477) was constructed by integration of a 148 bp, PCR-amplified (primer pair lcrF_ICR_fw/lcrF_ICR_rv) DNA fragment into the EcoRI/NheI restriction sites of pBAD2-gfp. Plasmid pBO6528 was engineered as follows: First, an EcoRI restriction site was replaced by a SacI site via site-directed mutagenesis (primer pair bgaB_Eco_Sac_fw/ bgaB_Eco_Sac_rv) resulting in pBO6524. Then, the YPK_2615 (cnfY) 5’-UTR (harbors two EcoRI restriction sites) was PCR-amplified (312 bp) with primer pair cnfY_TSSl_fw/cnfY_TSSl_rv and ligated into NheI/SacI restriction sites of pBO6524 obtaining pBO6527. The SacI restriction was exchanged by a EcoRI site using site-directed mutagenesis (primer pair cnfY_Sac_Eco_fw/cnfY_Sac_Eco_rv) resulting in plasmid pBO6528. Plasmid pBO6523 was constructed applying site-directed mutagenesis (T26C) with primer pair cnfY_Ype_fw/cnfY_Ype_rv. Mutation R1+2 (ATCAG29-33TCCT) was inserted into pBAD2-cnfY-bgaB-His (pBO3192) via site-directed mutagenesis (primer pair cnfY_R1+2_fw/cnfY_R1+2_rv) obtaining pBO4449.
The run-off plasmid for in vitro transcription the cnfY RNAT (pBO4465) was constructed by blunt-end ligation of a PCR-amplified DNA fragment (primer pair cnfY_RO_fw/cnfY_RO_rv), comprising the T7 RNA polymerase promoter, and the cnfY RNAT including 80 bp of the cnfY coding region, into the SmaI restriction site of pUC18. Insertion of the repressive R1+2 mutation (ATCAG29-33TCCT) into pBO4465 was achieved by site-directed mutagenesis (primer pair cnfY_R1+2_fw/cnfY_R1+2_rv), resulting in pBO4466. Plasmids pBO4493 and pBO4494 were created by Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany). Briefly, two DNA fragments, comprising the promoter region, the 5’-UTR as well as 123 bp of the coding region of cnfY, were synthesized. These fragments were ligated into pEX-K168 (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany) and include the repressive mutations R1 (AG32-33CT) or R1+2 (ATCAG29-33TCCT), respectively. For construction of the translational gene fusions to luxCDABE, the promoter region, the 5’-UTR (wild type, R1, and R1+2 variant of the cnfY RNAT) as well as 30 bp of the coding region of cnfY were PCR-amplified (GmR_NcoI_fw/GmR_BamHI_rv)), using genomic DNA, pBO4493, and pBO4494, as template. Next, the resulting DNA fragments were ligated via BamHI/SalI restriction sites into pFU53, obtaining plasmids pBO6500, pBO6501, and pBO6502, respectively. The construction of the cnfY complementation plasmids, harboring the cnfY promoter region and the repressive cnfY RNAT variants R1 (AG32-33CT; pBO6503) or R1+2 (ATCAG29-33TCCT; pBO6504) was carried out as follows. First, a gentamycin resistance cassette was PCR-amplified, using pBAD2-gfp as template, and ligated into pJNS10 via BamHI/NcoI restriction sites, obtaining pJNS10 ΔPcnfY::GenR (pBO4499). Next, two fragments comprising the promoter region, the 5’-UTR as well as 123 bp of the coding region of cnfY were PCR-amplified (primer pair PcnfY_BamHI_fw/cnfY_NcoI_rv) from pBO4493 and pBO4494, respectively. Finally, these fragments were integrated into the BamHI/NcoI restriction sites of pBO4499 obtaining plasmids pBO6503 and pBO6504, respectively.
Reporter gene activity assays
For β-galactosidase activity assays, E. coli DH5α or Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII cells carrying the cnfY 5’-UTR:bgaB fusion plasmids were grown overnight in LB with ampicillin at 25°C. Before being inoculated with an overnight culture (OD600 = 0.2), LB media supplemented with ampicillin was pre-warmed to 25°C. After growth to an OD600 = 0.5, transcription was induced with 0.01% w/v (E. coli) or 0.1% w/v (Y. pseudotuberculosis) L-arabinose. The culture was split up and shifted to pre warmed 100 ml flasks (temperatures indicated in the respective figure). The cultures were incubated for 30 min and 400 μl samples were subsequently taken for β-galactosidase assay. The β-galactosidase assay was carried out as described previously [18,27]. Standard deviations were calculated from three technical replicates.
The gfp reporter gene assay was performed as follows: E. coli DH5α or Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII cultures carrying the wild type of the mutated cnfY 5’-UTR:gfp fusion plasmids were grown and treated as described above. Afterwards, 2 ml samples were taken for Western blot analysis and 4 ml samples were taken for total RNA isolation and subsequent Northern blot analysis.
Western blot analysis
Cell pellets of E. coli DH5α, Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII, Y. pseudotuberculosis YP216 were resuspended in 1 x SDS sample buffer (2% (w/v) SDS, 0.1% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8) according to their optical density (CNFY synthesis studies: 100 μl for OD600 = 1; gfp reporter gene assay: 100 μl for OD600 = 0.5). After boiling for 10 min at 95°C, samples were centrifugated (10 min, 13000 rpm) and the protein extracts were subjected to SDS gel electrophoresis (10–12.5% SDS PAA gels). Subsequent Western transfer was performed by tank blotting onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond-C Extra, GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). An anti-CNFY antibody was used in a 1:1000 dilution, anti-GFP antibody (ABIN129570, antibodies-online GmbH, Aachen) was used in a 1:10000 dilution and secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit-HRP conjugate (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) in a 1:3000 dilution. Luminescence signals were detected by incubating membranes with Luminata Forte Western HRP (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) substrate and the ChemiImager Ready (Alpha Innotec, San Leandro, USA).
RNA isolation
Pellets of E. coli DH5α or Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII cells were washed with 1 ml cold resuspension buffer (10 mM TRIS/HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). After resuspension in 250 μl cold resuspension buffer and addition of 250 μl lysis buffer (50 mM TRIS/HCl pH 8.0, 8% (w/v) sucrose, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.4% (w/v) lysozyme, 10 mM EDTA), cells were heated to 65°C for 30 s. RNA was obtained from samples by four times extraction with acid phenol followed by three times extraction with chloroform/isoamylalcohol (24:1). After ethanol precipitation, RNA pellets were resuspended in 50 μl ddH2O. RNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer ND-1000 (PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany).
Northern blot analysis
Northern blot analysis was performed as described previously [28]. For detection of gfp transcript a 286 bp fragment was PCR-amplified from pBAD2-gfp. RNA probes were derived from in vitro transcription with digoxigenin (DIG) labeled nucleotides (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Samples for comparative qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis of cnfY expression were taken from the same cultures. Transcript abundance was determined from three independent cultures measured in duplicate. The non-thermoregulated reference genes gyrB and nuoB were used for normalization [29]. After isolation, 10 μg total RNA were treated with DNase (DNA-free Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, United States) followed by cDNA synthesis (iScript cDNA synthesis Kit, Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) according to the manufactures protocols (1 μg RNA per reaction). Two μl of diluted cDNA (1:10) were mixed with 0.25 μl of each primer (10 ρM), 5 μl of iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix, and 2.5 μl sterile water (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Amplification and detection were performed in a CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, United States) under conditions optimized for each gene target. For analysis of each gene target, a six-point standard curve was included to ensure satisfactory amplification efficiency and ascertain that all samples fall within the linear range of the standard curve. Relative cnfY transcript amounts were calculated using the ΔΔCt method [30] with experimental Ct values normalized to that of nuoB and gyrB. Primer efficiencies calculated by the CFX Maestro software were as follows: gyrB: 102.9%, nuoB: 102.7%, and cnfY: 98.4%.
In vitro transcription
RNAs for structure probing and primer extension inhibition experiments were synthesized in vitro by run-off transcription with T7 RNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) from EcoRV-linearized plasmids (listed in S3 Table) as previously described [18].
Enzymatic structure probing
Structure probing of the 5’-UTR and 80 nt of cnfY was performed with in vitro transcribed RNA using pBO4465 or pBO4466 as template. The in vitro transcribed RNA was purified and dephosphorylated using CIP enzyme (Calf intestinal phosphatase, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA). The RNA was labeled with [32P] at the 5′ end as described elsewhere [31]. Partial digestions of radiolabeled RNA with ribonuclease T1 (0.0025 U) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA) and T2 (0.056 U) (MoBiTec, Göttingen, Germany) were performed according to [32] at 25, 37, and 42°C. For digestion with RNase T1 and RNase T2 a 5 x TN buffer (100 mM Tris acetate, pH 7, 500 mM NaCl) was used. An alkaline hydrolysis ladder was prepared as described before [31]. The T1-ladder was generated by using 30000 cpm labeled RNA. The RNA was heated with 1 μl sequencing buffer (provided with RNase T1) at 90°C. Afterwards, the RNA was incubated with the enzyme at 37°C for 5 min.
Primer extension and Primer extension inhibition analysis (toeprinting)
The cnfY transcriptional start site was mapped by primer extension as described previously [33]. Primer cnfY_RO_rv was used for reverse transcription of RNA isolated from bacteria that were grown at 37°C. The DNA sequence reaction was performed with the same primer using the Thermo Sequenase cycle sequencing kit (USB, now Affymetrix) and plasmid pBO4465 as template.
Toe printing analysis was performed with 30S ribosomal subunit, in vitro transcribed RNA and tRNAfMet (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) according to a protocol described before [34]. A 5’-[32P]-labeled cnfY-specific oligonucleotide cnfY_RO_rv, complementary to nucleotides +61 to +80 (from ATG) of the cnfY mRNA, was used as a primer for cDNA synthesis. The radiolabeled primer (0.16 ρmol) was annealed to the cnfY mRNA (0.08 ρmol) and incubated with 30S ribosomal subunit (24 ρmol) or Watanabe buffer (60 mM HEPES/KOH; 10.5 mM Mg(COO)2; 690 mM NH4COO; 12 mM β-mercaptoethanol; 10 mM spermidine; 0.25 mM spermine) in presence of tRNAfMet (8 ρmol) at 25, 37 or 42°C for 10 min. After addition of 2 μl MMLV-Mix (VD+Mg2+ buffer, BSA, dNTPs and 800 U MMLV reverse transcriptase (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, US), cDNA synthesis was performed for 10 min at 37°C. Reaction was stopped by addition of formamide loading dye and samples were separated on a 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The Thermo Sequenase cycle sequencing Kit (USB, now Affymetrix) was used for sequencing reactions with plasmid pBO4465 as template and radiolabeled primer cnfY_RO_rv.
Measurement of cnfY expression by bioluminescence
Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII harboring the fusion plasmids pBO6500, pBO6501, or pBO6502 were diluted 1:50 in fresh LB from overnight cultures and grown to late exponential phase (4 h) at 25°C or 37°C. Reporter fusions (transcriptional and translational fusions to luxCDABE) emitting bioluminescence were measured in non-permeabilized cells with a Varioskan Flash (Thermo Scientific, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) using the SkanIt software (Thermo Scientific, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) or with a CLARIOstar plus reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The data are given as relative light units (RLU/OD600) from three independent cultures measured in triplicate.
Mouse infection studies
Female BALB/c mice (6- and 8-week-old) were acquired from Janvier (Saint Berthevin Cedex, France) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in accordance with FELASA recommendations in the animal facility of the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig.
For survival assays, mice were infected orally via food pellets inoculated with approximately 2x109 bacteria of Y. pseudotuberculosis strains YPIII with the empty vector pJNS11 and YP147 (cnfY::KanR), harboring either the empty vector pJNS11 or the cnfY complementation vector pJNS10 (pPcnfY:cnfY+) with either the wild type, the R1, or the R1+2 variant of the cnfY RNAT. Prior to infection, bacterial cells were washed three times and resuspended in sterile PBS. The infected mice were monitored daily for 14 days to determine the survival rate, the body weight and health status. Bacteria used for organ burden experiments were grown over night in LB medium at 25°C, washed and resuspended in sterile PBS. Groups of 5 animals were infected orally (via inoculated food pellets) with approximately 2x108 bacteria of Y. pseudotuberculosis strains YPIII with the empty vector pJNS11 and YP147 (cnfY::KanR), harboring either the empty vector pJNS11 or the cnfY complementation vector pJNS10 (pPcnfY:cnfY+) including the wild type, the R1, or the R1+2 variant of the cnfY RNAT. Five days after infection, mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation. The small intestine, the mesenteric lymph nodes, the liver, and the spleen were isolated and the Peyer’s patches were removed from the small intestine. Subsequently, whole organs were weighed and homogenized in PBS at 30000 rpm for 20 sec using a Polytron PT 2100 homogenizer (Kinematica, Switzerland). To determine the bacterial load of the organs, serial dilutions of the homogenates were plated on LB plates with 0.5 μg/ml triclosan. The colony forming units (cfu) were counted and are given as cfu per g organ/tissue.
Results
The cnfY transcript harbors a temperature-sensitive RNA element
Comparative RNAseq-based transcriptome profiling of Y. pseudotuberculosis grown at 25°C and 37°C, representing environmental and host body temperature, respectively, revealed an about 7-fold induction of cnfY transcripts at elevated temperature indicating transcriptional thermoregulation of cnfY expression [29]. To determine the corresponding protein levels of this toxin, we performed Western blot analysis using an antibody against CNFY after growing Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII at 25°C or 37°C (S1A Fig). Substantially elevated levels of CNFY were detected at 37°C compared to 25°C regardless of whether cells were grown to exponential or early stationary growth phase. To distinguish between transcriptional and translational control, we performed qRT-PCR and Western blot analyses using simultaneously collected samples from exponentially grown cells. We found a four-fold increase of cnfY transcript and 10-fold increase of CNFY protein (Fig 1A; representative Western blot in S1B Fig). This finding strongly suggests an additional layer of thermoregulation at post-transcriptional level.
Our previous global analysis of the Y. pseudotuberculosis RNA structurome [18] had provided evidence for translational temperature regulation through unfolding of the cnfY 5’-UTR from 25°C to 37°C (drop in PARS values in particular around the SD and anti-SD regions; Fig 1B). The PARS-derived secondary structure of the cnfY 5’-UTR constitutes a stem-loop structure including the SD sequence (5’-AAGGAG-3’) that partially pairs with a 5’-CAUCAGU-3’ region (Fig 1C). The intramolecular interaction region contains a bulged nucleotide (A29) and an internal loop (AG32-33, AG73-74) in the anti-SD/SD region, which are typical characteristics of temperature-sensitive RNA structures able to melt at elevated temperatures. The AUG translation start codon is part of a 9-nt loop, which separates the stem-loop in a short basal and a long terminal part. The overall sequence and structure is unrelated to the fourU-type RNAT upstream of Yersinia lcrF and does not resemble any of the known RNAT families.
Preliminary experiments in E. coli suggested that the cnfY 5’-UTR is a translational control element [18]. To characterize the regulatory features further, we established a new protocol for measuring bgaB-derived β-galactosidase activity in Y. pseudotuberculosis at 25°C and 37°C. The well-studied lcrF RNAT served as positive control [15]. The cnfY RNAT showed a clear induction of bgaB activity from 25 to 37°C comparable to the positive control and regardless of whether being tested in E. coli or Y. pseudotuberculosis (Fig 1D). Overall, these results show that cnfY expression is under combined transcriptional [29] and translational control.
Thermosensing by the cnfY RNAT is independent of the transcription start site
Based on transcriptional profiling data, we previously assumed a transcriptional start site (TSS) of cnfY, which is located 82 nt upstream of the AUG start codon (TSS A; Figs S2A and 2A). The corresponding 5’-UTR is able to confer thermal control in a reporter gene assay ([18] and Fig 1D). Two observations made us reassess the TSS. First, two additional peaks in an earlier transcriptome profile by Nuss et al. ([29] and S2A Fig) and secondly, a striking almost identical duplication further upstream of the RNAT in the Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII genome (S2A Fig and Fig 2A). A transcript starting from TSS A covers a full-length copy of the RNAT. The duplicated RNAT sequence further upstream of TSS A deviates in one nucleotide (T26C).
To map the 5’-end(s) of the cnfY mRNA, we performed primer extension experiments on total RNA isolated from Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII grown at 37°C. No signal was detected around position -82 relative to the AUG codon (TSS A, Fig 2A and 2B). Instead, we found a weak signal 183 nt (TSS B) and a strong signal 266 nt (TSS C) upstream of the start codon, respectively. The TSS C signal corresponds to the first of three signals visible in transcriptome profiling data of Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII grown to exponential phase at 37°C [29] (S2A Fig). To test whether the long 5’-UTR is capable of regulating reporter gene expression in response to temperature, we compared the activities of PBAD promoter-controlled translational bgaB fusions comprising the long TSS C or the short TSS A-derived 5’-UTRs followed by 30 nt of the coding region of cnfY fused to bgaB [18]. Both the long and short 5’-UTR conferred similar temperature-regulated expression (Fig 2C) suggesting that the TSS A-derived short 5’-UTR of cnfY with a single RNAT copy is sufficient for temperature regulation. From here on we will refer to this 5’-UTR (-82 nt from AUG) as cnfY RNAT.
Sequence comparison of the cnfY locus revealed duplicated thermometer sequences in other Y. pseudotuberculosis strains and in Y. pestis (S2B Fig). Interestingly, the nucleotide substitution (T26C) present in the distal copy of the thermometer in Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII was also found in the downstream copy in several Y. pseudotuberculosis strains and in Y. pestis (S2B Fig). In the secondary RNA structure, nucleotide 26 pairs with G79 (Fig 1C) and the U to C exchange should strengthen this interaction. To analyze the impact of this single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on translational control, a translational bgaB fusion of the U26C variant was constructed (“Y. pestis” RNAT in Fig 2C) and found to respond to increasing temperature like the Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII thermometer demonstrating that the SNP-containing natural variants retained their regulatory potential.
Point mutations impair thermometer functionality
The naturally occurring SNPs in the cnfY 5’-UTR motivated us to construct RNAT variants with increased stability. The bulged A29 residue and the internal loop (AG32-33, AG73-74) in the antiSD/SD region are destabilizing elements (Fig 3A) and most likely critical for temperature-dependent regulation of cnfY. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we previously constructed the repressive (stabilizing) mutations R1 (AG32-33CU) and R2 (ΔA29) into the cnfY RNAT, which partially inhibited expression in the β-galactosidase assay in E. coli [18]. To achieve full repression, we combined both mutations to obtain the R1+2 (ΔA29, AG32-33CU) variant of the cnfY RNAT with a perfectly paired SD region (Fig 3A). The R1, R2, and R1+2 variants fused to bgaB were analyzed at 25°C and 37°C in E. coli and Y. pseudotuberculosis (Fig 3B). RNAT variants with mutations R1 (AG32-33CU) and R2 (ΔA29) exhibited reduced levels of reporter gene activity compared to the wild-type thermometer. The combined mutation R1+2 (ΔA29, AG32-33CU) impaired temperature sensing and resulted in an almost complete loss of β-galactosidase activity even at 37°C. Due to the similar responses in the heterologous E. coli host and in Y. pseudotuberculosis, we conducted all subsequent experiments in Yersinia only.
The cnfY thermosensor controls translation in a temperature-dependent manner
To determine whether the cnfY RNAT mediates thermoregulation at translational rather than at transcriptional level of gene expression, we used a previously established gfp-based reporter gene system [35], in which the cnfY RNAT downstream of the PBAD promotor is translationally fused to gfp (Fig 4A). We measured gfp transcript levels by Northern blots with an anti-gfp RNA probe and GFP protein by Western blots with a GFP-specific antibody after growing Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII cultures at 25°C or after a shift to 37°C. A translational lcrF RNAT:gfp fusion served as positive control (Fig 4B). While reporter gene transcript levels remained nearly unaffected by temperature (Fig 4C), protein levels increased substantially after a shift to 37°C (Fig 4C). In accordance with the results of the β-galactosidase activity assay (Fig 1D), these results show that the cnfY RNAT confers temperature-dependent translational control to its downstream gene.
We also verified that the repressive mutations affected translation rather than transcription and determined RNA and protein levels by the pBAD2-gfp reporter system [35] as described above. In all cases, the transcript levels were similar at 25 and 37°C whereas the protein amounts of the WT, R1 and R2 fusions increased at 37°C (Fig 4D and 4E). Consistent with previous reports, the transcript levels of poorly translated repressive RNAT variants was low presumably because they are “naked” and not protected by translating ribosomes [28,36]. As observed with the bgaB fusions (Fig 3B), the R1 and R2 constructs retained some temperature responsiveness (Fig 4D and 4E). More specifically, stabilization of the SD region in R1 (Fig 3A) resulted in stronger translational repression compared to deletion of the bulged A in the anti-SD region in R2. The R1+R2 fusion combining both mutations was fully repressed.
Thermosensing by the cnfY RNAT is independent of the promoter
The results above demonstrate that the cnfY RNAT mediates translational thermoregulation to various reporter genes under control of the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter (Figs 1 to 4). In a final set of reporter gene fusion experiments, we measured bioluminescence of transcriptional and translational luxCDABE fusions downstream of the native cnfY promoter in plasmids pJNS02 [20] or pBO6500), respectively (Fig 5A). The reporter gene fusions include the promoter region as well as 6 nt (transcriptional fusion) or 30 nt (translational fusion) of the cnfY coding region. The established lux reporter gene system allows monitoring of gene expression in living cells by measuring bioluminescence [37]. Increased transcription at 37°C is consistent (Fig 5B) with previous results [29]. Two results suggest an important contribution of the RNAT to overall cnfY expression. First, lower bioluminescence at 25°C in the translational fusion supports an inhibitory function of the secondary RNA structure at low temperatures even when transcript is present. Second, higher temperature-dependent induction of the translational fusion is consistent with translational induction at host body temperature.
We also used translational luxCDABE fusions to confirm that the repressive RNAT mutations R1 and R1+2 affect translation of cnfY expressed from its natural promoter. This will later become relevant in the infection model (see Fig 8). We grew Y. pseudotuberculosis cells harboring the translational fusion plasmid with the wildtype RNAT at 25°C and 37°C and measured substantially higher bioluminescence at the higher temperature with the wild type RNAT (Fig 5C). Bioluminescence was strongly reduced in cells harboring the R1 variant and several orders of magnitudes lower in cells carrying the R1+2 variant consistent with the notion that translation is blocked due to the stable RNAT structure. All data described above demonstrate that the cnfY thermometer is functional in foreign and native genetic contexts and that it is a major determinant of thermoregulation of cnfY expression.
The cnfY RNAT melts gradually at elevated temperatures
To address whether the secondary structure of the cnfY RNAT melts open with increasing temperature, we performed enzymatic structure probing on in vitro transcribed radiolabeled RNA. The probing experiments were carried out at 25, 37 and 42°C using RNase T1 and RNase T2, which preferentially cleave 3’ of unpaired guanines and unpaired adenines, respectively. Due to these properties both RNases are ideal to monitor unfolding of the purine-rich SD region. The cleavage products were separated on a denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel (Fig 6A). Noticeable cleavage by RNase T1 or RNase T2 at 25°C suggests that nucleotides 73 to 77 of the SD region are in a partially single-stranded conformation. This is in good agreement with the PARS data-derived secondary structure of the cnfY RNAT, where A73 and G74 are located in an internal loop (Fig 6B). Notably, the SD sequence is temperature-sensitive as the cleavage intensities increased from 25°C to 37/42°C (Fig 6C) and nucleotides 71–72 and 78–79 flanking the SD sequence were only accessible at 37 and 42°C. Partially deviant from the PARS-derived secondary structure are the AUG start codon and the subsequent adenosine residues, which are poorly accessible at 25°C. This result suggests tertiary interactions at low temperature that are released at 37 and 42°C.
The cleavage pattern of RNase T1 and T2 in the hairpin up- and downstream of the translation initiation region largely reflects the PARS-constrained secondary structure (Fig 6B). Nucleotides 14 and 15, which are part of or in close proximity to an interior loop, are accessible to RNase T2 at 25°C. The base of the entire hairpin structure is thermo-labile since guanines at position 11, 96, and 97 are solely accessible to RNase T1 at 37 and 42°C. The same is true for the top of the structure, which is in a rather loose conformation since nucleotides 40, 45, 46, and 47 are already accessible to RNases T1 and T2 at 25°C. Guanines 57, 59, and 64, however, are responsible for structure formation at 25°C and become prone to nucleolytic attack only at 37°C. Overall, the structure probing results show that multiple irregularities (bulged residues, internal loops) throughout the needle-like structure of the cnfY 5’-UTR contribute to its temperature-sensitive nature, which allows opening after a rather mild transition from environmental to host body temperature. Fully consistent with impaired translation in reporter gene assays, probing of the R1+2 variant (ΔA29, AG32-33CT) revealed a structure that is overall similar to the wild-type structure, but in which the RBS is completely heat-resistant and inaccessible to RNases T1 and T2 at 37 and 42°C (Fig 6A).
To assess whether melting of the RNAT in vivo results in a gradual zipper-like or a sudden switch-like response, we assayed β-galactosidase activity of the bgaB fusion along a temperature range from 25 to 42°C. The wild-type cnfY thermometer induced a gradual increase of reporter gene activity (Fig 6D), indicating zipper-like opening of the RNAT structure. In line with the structure probing results (Fig 6A), the R1+2 fusion was completely unresponsive even at 42°C. These results provide evidence that the RNAT adopts a labile secondary structure at moderate environmental temperatures that reduces accessibility to the RBS to prevent cnfY translation when it is not necessary.
Ribosome binding to the SD region of the cnfY RNAT is temperature-controlled
The mode of action of most RNATs relies on temperature-dependent ribosome binding to the SD sequence, which results from a zipper-like melting process [5]. To address whether the cnfY leader sequence follows this regulatory principle we performed toeprinting experiments [34]. After annealing of a cnfY-specific primer to the cnfY RNAT including 80 nt of the coding region, the RNA was incubated with tRNAfMet and 30S ribosomal subunits at 25, 37 and 42°C. Following primer extension, the reverse transcripts were separated on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Toeprinting signals caused by ribosomes acting as a roadblock for reverse transcription appeared at +11 to +16 from the translation start codon only in presence of 30S ribosomal subunits (Fig 7A). Although residual ternary complex formation between mRNA, tRNAfMet and ribosome occurred at 25°C, this process was increased almost 3-fold at elevated temperatures (Fig 7B). Consistent with the absence of RNA melting in vitro and translation initiation in vivo, no toeprinting signal was detected with the R1+2 variant (ΔA29, AG32-33CT) of the cnfY thermometer. An additional signal between the AUG codon and SD sequence appeared, which increased in the presence of 30S ribosomal subunits. Such cDNA products are commonly observed with repressed RNAT structures, for example of the Salmonella enterica groES [38] and the Y. pseudotuberculosis lcrF RNATs [15]. They might result from inhibition or drop-off of the reverse transcriptase by the stable secondary structure. How the 30S subunit favors such premature reverse transcription products is unclear. Altogether, the results strongly suggest a temperature-controlled formation of a ternary complex in absence of any additional bacterial factors.
The cnfY RNAT controls provision of the CNFY toxin and is critical for virulence
A recent study demonstrated the pivotal role of the CNFY toxin in Y. pseudotuberculosis pathogenesis [20]. A deletion of cnfY rendered Y. pseudotuberculosis avirulent and this phenotype was restored in presence of the cnfY complementation vector pJNS10. This plasmid harbors the complete cnfY promoter region followed by the full-length cnfY open reading frame (Fig 8A). We inserted the repressive mutations R1 and R1+2 into pJNS10 (pJNS10-R1 and pJNS10-R1+2) and investigated their influence on CNFY synthesis via immunodetection. Y. pseudotuberculosis ΔcnfY (YP216) cells harboring the respective complementation vectors were grown to exponential growth phase at 25°C and 37°C, and samples were taken for Western blot analysis using a CNFY-specific antibody. Both, the R1 as well as the R1+2 mutation prevented cnfY translation at 37°C as no CNFY was detectable (Fig 8B).
Next, we investigated the relevance of the RNAT in pathogenesis by measuring the survival of BALB/c mice (n = 10 per strain) orally infected with the Y. pseudotuberculosis wild type carrying the empty vector pJNS11 or a cnfY-deficient strain (cnfY::KanR, YP147) harboring either pJNS11 or the cnfY-complementation vector (pJNS10) with the wild type, the R1, or R1+2 RNAT variant. The survival rate of infected mice was monitored for two weeks (Fig 8C). Mice infected with the wild type strain showed clear signs of infection (e.g. lethargy and rough fur) and reached humane endpoints (cut-off criteria based on health scores). Consistent with previous results [20], infection with the cnfY deletion strain did not result in the death of any mice. In presence of the cnfY complementation vector, however, the cnfY mutant was as virulent as the wild type. Mice infected with cnfY deficient mutants harboring pJNS10-R1 exhibited a survival rate of 80% post infection indicating that stabilization of the cnfY RNAT reduces virulence potential. The cnfY::KanR strain with the R1+2 RNAT was avirulent like the cnfY deletion mutant showing that proper temperature measurement is indispensable for host infection.
Bodyweight measurements of infected mice essentially reflected the survival results. The weight of mice infected with the wild type strain or the cnfY mutant complemented with plasmid-borne cnfY severely declined after two days of infection (Fig 8D). Mice infected with the cnfY::KanR mutant carrying the empty vector lost little weight and regained it within a week. Mice infected with Y. pseudotuberculosis mutants carrying stabilized cnfY RNATs showed intermediate phenotypes. They lost weight in the first six days but recovered and regained it thereafter. Consistent with the obtained survival rates, the strain carrying the most stable R1+2 RNAT variant least affected the fitness of the mice.
Finally, we tested whether stabilization of the cnfY thermosensor affects colonization of Y. pseudotuberculosis within Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), liver, or spleen. Mice (n = 10 per strain) were orally infected with 2x108 cells of Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII carrying the empty vector or with the cnfY deletion mutant carrying cnfY complementation vectors with the wild type, R1 or R1+2 RNAT. The number of bacteria in infected organs was determined by plating of organ homogenates five days post infection (Fig 9). No difference in colonization of the Peyer’s patches and the liver were observed between the five Y. pseudotuberculosis strains. In contrast, significantly reduced numbers of bacteria were recovered from MLNs and spleen when mice were infected with the cnfY mutant carrying either an empty vector or the complementation plasmid with the stabilized R1 or R1+R2 thermometers. The latter strain showed the same poor recovery from infected spleen, liver, and MLNs as observed for the cnfY deletion mutant. Taken together, the results clearly demonstrate that RNAT-controlled synthesis of CNFY is crucial for the virulence of Y. pseudotuberculosis.
Discussion
Precise spatio-temporal control of virulence gene expression determines the outcome of bacterial infections. Temperature is one of the consistent parameters that correlate with the stage of invasion during the infection of a warm-blooded host [1]. In contrast to transcriptional control mechanisms that proceed through several levels of gene expression, RNATs are one step ahead and directly feed the temperature signal into already existing transcripts and modulate the efficiency of translation initiation [7,8]. Accordingly, several pathogens control expression of their master virulence regulators by RNATs, such as PrfA, ToxT and LcrF in Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio cholerae and Yersinia species, respectively [15,16,39,40]. Thereby, entire virulence regulons are recruited under temperature control. In addition, individual genes responsible for specific virulence traits can be under direct control of RNATs. Examples are the capsule biosynthesis gene cssA in Neisseria meningitidis [41] or the heme uptake genes shuA and shuT in Shigella dysenteriae [42,43].
Here we report a detailed structure-function analysis of an RNAT controlling synthesis of the secreted toxin CNFY in Y. pseudotuberculosis, which we had identified in a global RNA structurome study [18]. The approx. 100 nt long RNA structure, which reaches more than 20 nt into the coding region contains several remarkable features. Three bulged residues, a two-residue bulge, a large bulge of 10 nt and four short internal loops (Fig 6B) contribute to an overall labile structure ideally suited to calibrate translation in the physiological temperature range like a rheostat. These multiple irregularities in the hairpin structure might provide breathing points also allowing for the observed residual translation even at low temperatures. As one might expect from the many unpaired nucleotides throughout the cnfY hairpin, the entire structure is engaged in the melting process. The overall architecture of the cnfY RNAT is unique and does not conform to known classes of RNA-based thermosensors, such as the fourU or ROSE elements [5]. The partially paired translation initiation region within an extensive hairpin structure is reminiscent of the prfA RNA thermosensor from L. monocytogenes [39]. However, in contrast to the sudden switch-like response around 37°C in the prfA thermometer [41], the temperature-induced opening of the cnfY thermosensor was gradual as in many other RNATs.
Another interesting observation relates to the genomic duplication of and polymorphisms in the cnfY thermometer, which is remarkably conserved among various Y. pseudotuberculosis strains and Y. pestis. Owing to a potential transposase gene (YPK_2616) upstream of cnfY, it was postulated that the cnfY gene was acquired via horizontal gene transfer [23]. During reevaluation of the transcription start site(s) of the cnfY gene, we discovered a major start site upstream of the previously annotated start site. The resulting alternative transcript (TSS C, Fig 2A) contains a duplicated RNAT sequence and is equally functional as the cnfY RNAT when present in single copy. A common SNP (U26C) that slightly increases the thermodynamic stability of the secondary structure is common in the upstream copy. The presence of this substitution in the downstream copies in other Y. pseudotuberculosis strains (IP32593 or PB1/+) and in Y. pestis did not abrogate thermoregulation (Fig 2C) suggesting an evolutionary pressure to maintain the functionality of the cnfY RNAT. Despite having functional thermosensors, several Y. pseudotuberculosis strains and Y. pestis do not produce CNFY because they encode a truncated cnfY pseudogene encoding a non-functional toxin [23]. Our results suggest that the ancestral and still intact cnfY genes in these organisms have been under temperature control.
The inspection of the 5’-UTRs of a variety of genes coding for CNF family toxins in bacteria other than Yersinia suggests that RNAT-mediated thermoregulation of GTPase-activating toxins is quite common. Although the nucleotide sequences upstream of cnf1 from UPEC, dnt from Bordetella pertussis, and vopC from Vibrio paraheamolyticus, which code for the cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1), the dermonecrotizing toxin (DNT), and the CNF-like toxin VopC, respectively [44–46], do not exhibit any sequence conservation among each other or to Y. pseudotuberculosis cnfY (S3A Fig), all of them are predicted to fold into cnfY RNAT-like secondary structures (S3B Fig). Partially or completely occluded SD sequences and/or start codons in extensive stem-loop structures strongly suggest temperature-driven control of translation initiation in all these pathogens.
The combined results from this and previous studies (data from transcriptome studies summarized in S4 Table) show that thermoregulation of cnfY is a two-layered process comprised of transcriptional and translational control (Fig 10). Notably, even transcription of the cnfY pseudogene (YPTB1468) in Y. pseudotuberculosis IP32953 is temperature-dependent [47]. It is currently unknown how cnfY transcription is regulated. It could possibly be due to a temperature-sensitive regulator or the temperature-regulated synthesis of a transcription factor. Transcriptional profiling of Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII at 25°C and 37°C suggested an involvement of the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) because temperature-dependent transcription of cnfY was lost in a Δcrp mutant [29]. The CRP protein is a global transcriptional regulator that, in interplay with the signaling nucleotide cAMP, steers expression of genes associated with sugar utilization [48,49]. Moreover, this regulator was shown to be crucial for virulence of pathogenic Yersinia species [50–52], but also other enteropathogens such as UPEC strains [53], Klebsiella pneumonia [54,55], Proteus mirabilis [56], or Salmonella enterica [57].
Although temperature-regulated transcription plays a role in the provision of the CNFY toxin, our study shows that translational control by the cnfY thermometer accounts for a large proportion in this concerted process. Thermoregulation was maintained when transcription was driven from a foreign arabinose-inducible promoter suggesting that pre-existing cnfY transcripts are only efficiently translated when body temperature has been reached. Additional upregulation of transcription probably helps boost the toxin levels inside the host and to integrate other host-specific signals than temperature. A complex interplay between transcriptional and translational temperature control of gene expression has also been reported for synthesis of the virulence regulator LcrF from Y. pseudotuberculosis. Thermal induction involves temperature-regulated proteolysis of the YmoA transcription factor, which represses transcription of the yscW-lcrF operon at low temperatures, and an intergenic RNAT upstream of lcrF [15]. A most recent study demonstrated that the RNA-binding protein CsrA is involved in cell-contact mediated expression of lcrF [58]. CsrA binds to two sites within the lcrF transcript, one within and one downstream of the SD sequence, which destabilizes the RNAT structure and overcomes translational repression at low temperature (25°C). A dual layer of transcriptional and translational control is also quite common in heat shock gene regulation. Here, many heat-induced genes are under transcriptional control, for example by the alternative heat shock sigma factor σ32, plus RNAT-mediated translational control [27,33,59,60].
The CNFY toxin is one of the important virulence determinants predominantly expressed during the early stage of infection [61]. In this study, we show how crucial individual nucleotides in the untranslated region of a virulence gene are by applying an in vivo infection model. Animal models have previously only been used to demonstrate the importance of RNATs upstream of genes coding for virulence master regulators, namely LcrF and ToxT of Y. pseudotuberculosis and V. cholerae, respectively [15,40]. Other studies have been restricted to structure-function analysis and in vitro models [41–43,62–65]. Here, we demonstrated that converting the loose RNAT structure into a perfectly matched zipper repressed synthesis of CNFY within the mouse, which made Y. pseudotuberculosis avirulent. This result reinforces the notion that translational control by the RNAT is the dominant mechanism determining cnfY expression in the warm-blooded host. The CNFY toxin is supposed to amplify crucial virulence factor functions securing fine-tuning of Y. pseudotuberculosis pathogenicity [20]. Activity is known to be crucial for virulence as deletion of cnfY results in reduced mortality rates of infected mice [20]. Moreover, loss of CNFY reduces inflammatory responses in infected host tissues and reprograms the pathogen's transcriptional response towards a persistent life style [66]. The finding that stabilization of the cnfY thermosensor reduced the pathogen’s potential to colonize MLNs and spleens of infected mice is consistent with the observation that absence of CNFY provokes a significant increase of infiltrating macrophages, monocytes and natural killer cells in the spleen allowing a rapid killing of the pathogen [20].
Unlike many other Yersinia virulence factors, CNFY is not delivered via the T3SS but secreted via outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) [19,20,67]. The CNF-1 toxin from UPEC strains also takes the OMV route [67–69]. Also unlike many other virulence genes in Yersinia, the cnfY gene is not under temperature control by LcrF. Instead, the horizontally acquired gene is equipped with its own RNAT in order to produce the toxin once the bacterium is inside the warm-blooded host. We find it intriguing that similar RNAT-like structures are likely to exist upstream of various other toxin genes (see above). This finding supports the emerging view that RNA-mediated signal perception is common in pathogenic bacteria and that such RNA-based sensors might be attractive drug targets [70]. Interestingly, a magnesium-binding site in the Salmonella fourU thermometer could be targeted by Hexaammincobalt(III)-chlorid [71] and triptycene-based small molecule binding to a central three-way junction in the E. coli rpoH thermosensor were able to stabilize the structure [72]. These findings promise that antimicrobial compounds interfering with the functionality of RNA thermometers can be developed.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Daniel Scheller for help with qRT-PCR experiments and Simon Czolkoss for critical reading of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG NA 240/10-2). Petra Dersch was supported by the Helmholtz Association and the German Centre for Infection Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Steinmann R, Dersch P. Thermosensing to adjust bacterial virulence in a fluctuating environment. Front Microbiol. 2013; 8(1):85–105. 10.2217/fmb.12.129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lam O, Wheeler J, Tang CM. Thermal control of virulence factors in bacteria: A hot topic. Virulence. 2014; 5(8):852–62. 10.4161/21505594.2014.970949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Klinkert B, Narberhaus F. Microbial thermosensors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009; 66(16):2661–76. 10.1007/s00018-009-0041-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Saita EA, De Mendoza D. Thermosensing via transmembrane protein-lipid interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015; 1848(9):1757–64. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kortmann J, Narberhaus F. Bacterial RNA thermometers: molecular zippers and switches. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012; 10(4):255–65. 10.1038/nrmicro2730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Krajewski SS, Narberhaus F. Temperature-driven differential gene expression by RNA thermosensors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1839(10):978–88. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grosso-Becera MV, Servin-González L, Soberón-Chávez G. RNA structures are involved in the thermoregulation of bacterial virulence-associated traits. Trends Microbiol. 2015; 23(8):509–18. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Loh E, Righetti F, Eichner H, Twittenhoff C, Narberhaus F. RNA thermometers in bacterial pathogens. Microbiol Spectr. 2018; 6(2):RWR-0012-2017 10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0012-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pechous RD, Sivaraman V, Stasulli NM, Goldman WE. Pneumonic plague: the darker side of Yersinia pestis. Trends Microbiol. 2016; 24(3):190–7. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fredriksson-Ahomaa M. Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. In: Foodborne Diseases. 2007. p. 79–112 10.1128/9781555815936.ch11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Atkinson S, Williams P. Yersinia virulence factors—a sophisticated arsenal for combating host defences. F1000Res. 2016; 5:1370 10.12688/f1000research.8466.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Straley SC, Plano G V., Skrzypek E, Haddix PL, Fields KA. Regulation by Ca2+ in the Yersinia low-Ca2+ response. Mol Microbiol. 1993; 8(6):1005–10. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01644.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Straley SC. The low-Ca2+ response virulence regulon of human-pathogenic yersiniae. Microb Pathog. 1991; 10(2):87–91. 10.1016/0882-4010(91)90069-m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Straley SC, Perry RD. Environmental modulation of gene expression and pathogenesis in Yersinia. Trends Microbiol. 1995; 3(8):310–7. 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)88960-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Böhme K, Steinmann R, Kortmann J, Seekircher S, Heroven AK, Berger E, Pisano F, Thiermann T, Wolf-Watz H, Narberhaus F, Dersch P. Concerted actions of a thermo-labile regulator and a unique intergenic RNA thermosensor control Yersinia virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8(2):e1002518 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoe NP, Goguen JD. Temperature sensing in Yersinia pestis: translation of the LcrF activator protein is thermally regulated. J Bacteriol. 1993; 175(24):7901–9. 10.1128/jb.175.24.7901-7909.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kertesz M, Wan Y, Mazor E, Rinn JL, Nutter RC, Chang HY, Segal E. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature. 2010; 467(7311):103–7. 10.1038/nature09322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Righetti F, Nuss AM, Twittenhoff C, Beele S, Urban K, Will S, Bernhart SH, Stadler PF, Dersch P, Narberhaus F. Temperature-responsive in vitro RNA structurome of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113(26):7237–42. 10.1073/pnas.1523004113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Monnappa AK, Bari W, Seo JK, Mitchell RJ. The cytotoxic necrotizing factor of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (CNFY) is carried on extracellular membrane vesicles to host cells. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):14186 10.1038/s41598-018-32530-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schweer J, Kulkarni D, Kochut A, Pezoldt J, Pisano F, Pils MC, Genth H, Huehn J, Dersch P. The Cytotoxic necrotizing factor of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (CNFY) enhances inflammation and Yop delivery during infection by activation of Rho GTPases. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9(11):e1003746 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wolters M, Boyle EC, Lardong K, Trülzsch K, Steffen A, Rottner K, Ruckdeschel K, Aepfelbacher M. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor-Y boosts Yersinia effector translocation by activating Rac protein. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288(32):23543–53. 10.1074/jbc.M112.448662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hoffmann C, Pop M, Leemhuis J, Schirmer J, Aktories K, Schmidt G. The Yersinia pseudotuberculosis cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNFY) selectively activates RhoA. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(16):16026–32. 10.1074/jbc.M313556200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lockman HA, Gillespie RA, Baker BD, Shakhnovich E. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis produces a cytotoxic necrotizing factor. Infect Immun. 2002; 70(5):2708–14. 10.1128/IAI.70.5.2708-2714.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Knust Z, Schmidt G. Cytotoxic necrotizing factors (CNFs)-a growing toxin family. Toxins (Basel). 2010; 2(1):116–27. 10.3390/toxins2010116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Derbise A, Lesic B, Dacheux D, Ghigo JM, Carniel E. A rapid and simple method for inactivating chromosomal genes in Yersinia. FEMS Immun Med Microbiol. 2003; 38(2):113–6. 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00181-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sambrook J, W Russell D. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harb Lab Press Cold Spring Harb NY; 2001; 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90210-6 1205 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gaubig LC, Waldminghaus T, Narberhaus F. Multiple layers of control govern expression of the Escherichia coli ibpAB heat-shock operon. Microbiology. 2011; 157(Pt 1):66–76. 10.1099/mic.0.043802-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Klinkert B, Cimdins A, Gaubig LC, Roßmanith J, Aschke-Sonnenborn U, Narberhaus F. Thermogenetic tools to monitor temperature-dependent gene expression in bacteria. J Biotechnol. 2012; 160(1–2):55–63. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nuss AM, Heroven AK, Waldmann B, Reinkensmeier J, Jarek M, Beckstette M, Dersch P. Transcriptomic profiling of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis reveals reprogramming of the Crp regulon by temperature and uncovers Crp as a master regulator of small RNAs. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11(3):e1005087 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25(4):402–8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brantl S, Wagner EG. Antisense RNA-mediated transcriptional attenuation occurs faster than stable antisense/target RNA pairing: an in vitro study of plasmid pIP501. EMBO J. 1994; 13(15):3599–607. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01813.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Waldminghaus T, Heidrich N, Brantl S, Narberhaus F. FourU: a novel type of RNA thermometer in Salmonella. Mol Microbiol. 2007; 65(2):413–24. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05794.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Krajewski SS, Nagel M, Narberhaus F. Short ROSE-like RNA thermometers control IbpA synthesis in Pseudomonas species. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e65168 10.1371/journal.pone.0065168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hartz D, McPheeters DS, Traut R, Gold L. Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes. Methods Enzym. 1988; 164:419–25. 10.1016/S0076-6879(88)64058-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Roßmanith J, Weskamp M, Narberhaus F. Design of a temperature-responsive transcription terminator. ACS Synth Biol. 2018; 7(2):613–21. 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Deana A, Belasco JG. Lost in translation: The influence of ribosomes on bacterial mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2005; 19(21):2526–33. 10.1101/gad.1348805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Uliczka F, Pisano F, Kochut A, Opitz W, Herbst K, Stolz T, Dersch P. Monitoring of gene expression in bacteria during infections using an adaptable set of bioluminescent, fluorescent and colorigenic fusion vectors. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e20425 10.1371/journal.pone.0020425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cimdins A, Roßmanith J, Langklotz S, Bandow JE, Narberhaus F. Differential control of Salmonella heat shock operons by structured mRNAs. Mol Microbiol. 2013; 89(4):715–31. 10.1111/mmi.12308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Johansson J, Mandin P, Renzoni A, Chiaruttini C, Springer M, Cossart P. An RNA thermosensor controls expression of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes. Cell. 2002; 110(5):551–61. 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00905-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weber GG, Kortmann J, Narberhaus F, Klose KE. RNA thermometer controls temperature-dependent virulence factor expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111(39):14241–6. 10.1073/pnas.1411570111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Loh E, Kugelberg E, Tracy A, Zhang Q, Gollan B, Ewles H, Chalmers R, Pelicic V, Tang CM. Temperature triggers immune evasion by Neisseria meningitidis. Nature. 2013; 502(7470):237–40. 10.1038/nature12616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kouse AB, Righetti F, Kortmann J, Narberhaus F, Murphy ER. RNA-Mediated thermoregulation of iron-acquisition genes in Shigella dysenteriae and pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5) 10.1371/journal.pone.0063781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wei Y, Kouse AB, Murphy ER. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of Shigella shuT in response to host-associated iron availability and temperature. Microbiologyopen. 2017; 6(3):e00442 10.1002/mbo3.442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schmidt G, Sehr P, Wilm M, Mann M, Aktories K. Gln 63 of Rho is deamidated by Escherichia coli cytotoxic necrotizing factor-1. Nature. 1997; 387(June):725–9. 10.1038/42735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fukui A, Horiguchi Y. Bordetella dermonecrotic toxin exerting toxicity through activation of the small GTPase Rho. J Biochem. 2004; 136(4):415–9. 10.1093/jb/mvh155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang L, Krachler AM, Broberg CA, Li Y, Mirzael H, Gilpin CJ, Orth K. Type III effector VopC mediates invasion for Vibrio species. Cell Rep. 2012; 1(5):453–60. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nuss AM, Beckstette M, Pimenova M, Schmühl C, Opitz W, Pisano F, Heroven AK, Dersch P. Tissue dual RNA-seq allows fast discovery of infection-specific functions and riboregulators shaping host–pathogen transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017; 114(5):E791–800. 10.1073/pnas.1613405114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kolb A, Busby S, Buc H, Garges S, S A. Transcriptional regulation by cAMP and its receptor protein. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993; 62:749–95. 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.003533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Deutscher J. The mechanisms of carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008; 11(2):87–93. 10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lathem WW, Schroeder JA, Bellows LE, Ritzert JT, Koo JT, Price PA, Caulfield AJ, Goldman WE. Posttranscriptional regulation of the Yersinia pestis cyclic AMP receptor protein Crp and impact on virulence. MBio. 2014; 5(1):1–12. 10.1128/mbio.01038-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Heroven AK, Sest M, Pisano F, Scheb-Wetzel M, Steinmann R, Böhme K, Klein J, Münch R, Schomburg D, Dersch P. Crp induces switching of the CsrB and CsrC RNAs in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and links nutritional status to virulence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012; 2(158):1–21. 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhan L, Han Y, Yang L, Geng J, Li Y, Gao H, Guo Z, Fan W, Li G, Zhang L, Qin C, Zhou D, Yang R. The cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP, is required for both virulence and expression of the minimal CRP regulon in Yersinia pestis biovar microtus. Infect Immun. 2008; 76(11):5028–37. 10.1128/IAI.00370-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Donovan GT, Paul Norton J, Bower JM, Mulvey MA. Adenylate cyclase and the cyclic AMP receptor protein modulate stress resistance and virulence capacity of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2013; 81(1):249–58. 10.1128/IAI.00796-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Xue J, Tan B, Yang S, Luo M, Xia H, Zhang X, Zhou X, Yang X, Yang R, Li Y, Qiu J. Influence of cAMP receptor protein (CRP) on bacterial virulence and transcriptional regulation of allS by CRP in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Gene. 2016; 593(1):28–33. 10.1016/j.gene.2016.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ou Q, Fan J, Duan D, Xu L, Wang J, Zhou D, Yang H, Li B. Involvement of cAMP receptor protein in biofilm formation, fimbria production, capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis and lethality in mouse of Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype K1 causing pyogenic liver abscess. J Med Microbiol. 2017; 66(1):1–7. 10.1099/jmm.0.000391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tsai YL, Chien HF, Huang KT, Lin WY, Liaw SJ. CAMP receptor protein regulates mouse colonization, motility, fimbria-mediated adhesion, and stress tolerance in uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1–14. 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.El Mouali Y, Gaviria-Cantin T, Sánchez-Romero MA, Gibert M, Westermann AJ, Vogel J, Balsalobre C. CRP-cAMP mediates silencing of Salmonella virulence at the post-transcriptional level. PLoS Genet. 2018; 14(6):1–26. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kusmierek M, Hoßmann J, Witte R, Opitz W, Vollmer I, Volk M, Heroven AK, Wolf-Watz H, Dersch P. A bacterial secreted translocator hijacks riboregulators to control type III secretion in response to host cell contact. PLoS Pathog. 2019; 15(6):e1007813 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Waldminghaus T, Fippinger A, Alfsmann J, Narberhaus F. RNA thermometers are common in α- and γ-proteobacteria. Biol Chem. 2005; 386(12):1279–86. 10.1515/BC.2005.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Krajewski SS, Joswig M, Nagel M, Narberhaus F. A tricistronic heat shock operon is important for stress tolerance of Pseudomonas putida and conserved in many environmental bacteria. Env Microbiol. 2014; 16(6):1835–53. 10.1111/1462-2920.12432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Avican K, Fahlgren A, Huss M, Heroven AK, Beckstette M, Dersch P, Fällman M. Reprogramming of Yersinia from virulent to persistent mode revealed by complex in vivo RNA-seq analysis. PLoS Pathog. 2015; 11(1):1–28. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Loh E, Lavender H, Tan F, Tracy A, Tang CM. Thermoregulation of meningococcal fHbp, an important virulence factor and vaccine antigen, is mediated by anti-ribosomal binding site sequences in the open reading frame. PLoS Pathog. 2016; 12(8):1–21. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Grosso-Becerra M V., Croda-Garcia G, Merino E, Servin-Gonzalez L, Mojica-Espinosa R, Soberon-Chavez G. Regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors by two novel RNA thermometers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111(43):15562–7. 10.1073/pnas.1402536111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Matsunaga J, Schlax PJ, Haake DA. Role for cis-Acting RNA sequences in the temperature-dependent expression of the multiadhesive Lig proteins in Leptospira interrogans. J Bacteriol. 2013; 195(22):5092–101. 10.1128/JB.00663-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li G-W, Burkhardt D, Gross C, Weissman JS. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell. 2014; 157(3):624–35. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Heine W, Beckstette M, Heroven AK, Thiemann S, Heise U, Nuss AM, Pisano F, Strowig T, Dersch P. Loss of CNFY toxin-induced inflammation drives Yersinia pseudotuberculosis into persistency. PLoS Pathog. 2018; 14(2):1–32. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Blumenthal B, Hoffmann C, Aktories K, Backert S, Schmidt G. The cytotoxic necrotizing factors from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and from Escherichia coli bind to different cellular receptors but take the same route to the cytosol. Infect Immun. 2007; 75(7):3344–53. 10.1128/IAI.01937-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kouokam JC, Wai SN, Fällman M, Hacker J, Uhlin BE, Fa M, Dobrindt U. Active cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 associated with outer membrane vesicles from uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2006; 74(4):2022–30. 10.1128/IAI.74.4.2022-2030.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Davis JM, Carvalho HM, Rasmussen SB, O’Brien AD. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor type 1 delivered by outer membrane vesicles of uropathogenic Escherichia coli attenuates polymorphonuclear leukocyte antimicrobial activity and chemotaxis. Infect Immun. 2006; 74(8):4401–8. 10.1128/IAI.00637-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ignatov D, Johansson J. RNA-mediated signal perception in pathogenic bacteria. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2017; 8(6):e1429 10.1002/wrna.1429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rinnenthal J, Klinkert B, Narberhaus F, Schwalbe H. Modulation of the stability of the Salmonella fourU-type RNA thermometer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(18):8258–70. 10.1093/nar/gkr314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Barros SA, Yoon I, Chenoweth DM. Modulation of the E. coli rpoH temperature sensor with triptycene-based small molecules. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016; 55(29):8258–61. 10.1002/anie.201601626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.