Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Jan 11;29:105113. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105113

U–Th whole rock data and high spatial resolution U–Th disequilibrium and U–Pb zircon ages of Mt. Erciyes and Mt. Hasan Quaternary stratovolcanic complexes (Central Anatolia)

Bjarne Friedrichs a,, Axel K Schmitt a, Lucy McGee b,c, Simon Turner b
PMCID: PMC6994622  PMID: 32021883

Abstract

Thirty-eight lava and pyroclastic samples were collected from Mt. Erciyes and Mt. Hasan, the two largest stratovolcanic complexes of the Central Anatolian Volcanic Province in Turkey. More than 1000 zircon crystals were dated by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) applying U–Th disequilibrium and U–Pb methods. Model ages were calculated from zircon 230Th–238U–232Th isotopic compositions in combination with U–Th whole rock data of digested lava samples generated by Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). Middle and Late Pleistocene ages dominate the dataset, but are complemented by both older (predominantly Early Pleistocene) and younger (Holocene) ages. U–Th disequilibrium and U–Pb zircon data provide maximum eruption ages that can be further specified by (U–Th)/He geochronology (zircon double dating). Additionally, these data are important to constrain the longevity and size of magmatic systems, and their potential for reactivation leading to potentially hazardous eruptions.

Keywords: U-series dating, Zircon, Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), Central Anatolian Volcanic Province (CAVP), Cappadocia, Turkey

Abbrevation: SIMS, Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry; MC-ICP-MS, Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry


Specifications Table

Subject Geochemistry and Petrology
Specific subject area Geochronology, Geochemistry
Type of data Tables
How data were acquired Multi-Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS); Nu Instruments Nu Plasma; Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS); CAMECA ims 1280-HR; Heidelberg University, Germany
Data format MC-ICP-MS: U–Th whole rock isotope data in *.xlsx format (Supplementary Table 1)
SIMS: U–Th–Pb zircon data in *.xlsx format (corrected for relative sensitivity and Th disequilibrium; Supplementary Tables 3 and 4)
Parameters for data collection MC-ICP-MS: Lava bulk rock samples were powdered, spiked, and digested. U and Th were extracted by column separation.
SIMS: Zircon crystals were separated from lava and composite pumice samples, rinsed in HF, and pressed in Indium (rim analyses). Selected crystals were re-mounted in epoxy resin and polished (interior analyses).
Description of data collection MC-ICP-MS: U and Th concentrations and isotope ratios were determined by separate isotope dilution analyses.
SIMS: 238U16O+, 232Th16O+, and 230Th16O+ were analysed simultaneously in multi-collection mode. 204Pb+, 206Pb+, 207Pb+, 208Pb+, 232Th+, 238U+, 238U16O+, and 238U16O2+ were analyzed sequentially in single-collection mode.
Data source location Mt. Erciyes and Mt. Hasan stratovolcanic complexes (Central Anatolia) as plotted in Fig. 1 and reported in Table 1.
Data accessibility With the article
Value of the Data
  • U–Th disequilibrium and U–Pb zircon crystallization ages define maximum eruption ages for a comprehensive sample set of Mt. Erciyes and Mt. Hasan volcanic systems (Central Anatolia).

  • The dataset provides a basis for the study of magma chamber processes and related volcanic hazard assessments to petrologists and volcanologists, respectively.

  • Zircon crystallization ages can be employed for 238U–230Th disequilibrium corrections to enhance (U–Th)/He geochronology.

  • Age spectra and the combination of rim and interior analyses can help to constrain the longevity and size of magmatic systems.

1. Data

An overview map and sample locations plotted on a digital elevation model [1] are given in Fig. 1. Descriptions and coordinates for 38 andesitic to rhyolitic lava and pyroclastic samples of Mt. Erciyes and Mt. Hasan Quaternary stratovolcanic complexes are provided in Table 1. U–Th whole rock isotope data for six lava samples are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Equipoints employed for U–Th disequilibrium age calculations are stated in Supplementary Table 2. High spatial resolution U–Th and U–Pb zircon geochronological data for 1136 crystals are presented in Supplementary Table 3 (U–Th) and Supplementary Table 4 (U–Pb).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic illustration of calculation of an equipoint (green star; Supplementary Table 2) based on a measured whole rock (238U)/(232Th) (red star; Supplementary Table 1) and the corresponding model melt (230Th)/(232Th) at the time of the youngest peak of the zircon age spectrum (Δt; white star); this peak was identified as the youngest maximum in the probability density function of individual zircon isochron slopes. The projection of the model melt to an equipoint on the equiline simulates identical melt compositions for each zircon at the time of its crystallization and precludes false isochrons (red dotted line). U–Th disequilibrium ages presented in Supplementary Table 3 are thus based on such equipoints.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview map with the Central Anatolian Volcanic Province (CAVP) in Turkey (A) and sample locations at Mt. Erciyes (B) and Mt. Hasan (C) on a digital elevation model [1] at similar scales.

Table 1.

Sample descriptions and locations in WGS84 coordinate system.

Volcano Sample Sample Type Type of Deposit Location Longitude [°E] Latitude [°N] Altitude [m]
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-01 Composite pumice Pyroclastic flow SE’ Hacılar 35.48838 38.60710 1777
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-02 Composite pumice Fall-out (Perikartın) NE’ Perikartın Dome 35.47463 38.58301 2346
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-03 Dacite lava Lava dome Lifos Hill summit 35.47684 38.58928 2438
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-04 Rhyolite lava Lava dome Perikartın Dome 35.46033 38.58882 2165
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-06 Composite pumice Fall-out (Karagüllü) NE’ Karagüllü Dome 35.46366 38.62828 1518
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-07 Composite pumice Fall-out (Dikkartın) Dikkartın quarry 35.45111 38.47318 2186
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-08 Rhyolite lava Lava dome Dikkartın Dome 35.43597 38.49153 2561
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-10 Dacite lava Lava dome Ali Dağ Dome 35.54519 38.65537 1601
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-11 Rhyolite lava Lava dome Karagüllü Dome 35.42927 38.59659 1928
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-12 Dacite lava Lava flow Şeyharslantepe 35.36866 38.60228 1765
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-15 Dacite lava Lava dome Gökdağ Dome 35.31264 38.55700 1844
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-17 Dacite lava Lava dome S′ Yılanlı Dağ Dome 35.41218 38.69023 1306
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-18 Dacite lava Lava dome Üç Tepeler 35.48270 38.49808 2579
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-19 Composite pumice Ground surge (Valibabatepe ignimbrite) E′ Zincidere 35.60070 38.64144 1426
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-32 Pumiceous xenolith Scoria cone W′ Kızılören (Karnıyarık) 35.28968 38.60165 1320
Mt. Erciyes 15-KVG-34 Pumiceous xenolith Scoria cone S′ Kızılören 35.32088 38.59018 1545
Mt. Erciyes 17-BF-21 Dacite lava Lava flow N′ Çarık Tepe 35.45537 38.62165 1738
Mt. Erciyes 17-BF-22 Dacite lava Lava dome NE’ Yılanlı Dağ Dome 35.41285 38.70983 1335
Mt. Erciyes 17-BF-23 Pumiceous xenolith Scoria cone W′ Kızılören (Karnıyarık) 35.28948 38.60163 1284
Mt. Erciyes 17-ERC-20 Dacite lava Lava flow E′ Mt. Erciyes summit 35.46356 38.53804 3378
Mt. Erciyes 17-ERC-100 Composite pumice Fall-out (below paleosol) Kayseri-Develi Road 35.51860 38.50429 2175
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-37 Composite pumice Pyroclastic flow (containing obsidian) S′ Taşpınar 34.03711 38.16354 1060
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-38 Bread crust bomb Block-and-ash-flow S′ Keçikalesi 34.12447 38.03805 1296
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-39 Composite pumice Pyroclastic flow (pumice-rich) SE’ Karakapı 34.19608 38.02654 1333
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-40 Bread crust bomb Block-and-ash-flow W′ Akçaören 34.23717 38.01357 1312
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-42 Andesite lava Lava flow NE’ Keçikalesi 34.14816 38.07016 1532
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-43 Obsidian lava Lava flow S′ Helvadere 34.18281 38.15471 2004
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-44 Andesite lava Lava flow W′ Dikmen 34.09197 38.15438 1326
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-46 Composite pumice Pyroclastic flow SW’ Kitreli 34.32973 38.16339 1541
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-49 Andesite lava Lava flow Keçikalesi Plateau 34.15616 38.11538 2521
Mt. Hasan 15-KVG-51 Andesite lava Lava flow Keçikalesi Plateau 34.15395 38.11063 2374
Mt. Hasan 17-BF-01 Andesite lava Lava flow S′ Uluören 34.18982 38.05828 1469
Mt. Hasan 17-BF-04 Andesite lava Lava flow W′ Dikmen 34.05520 38.16335 1131
Mt. Hasan 17-BF-06 Andesite lava Lava flow N′ Karakapı 34.17633 38.10400 2118
Mt. Hasan 17-BF-07 Dacite block Block-and-ash-flow Keçikalesi Plateau 34.15002 38.11452 2276
Mt. Hasan 17-BF-08 Andesite lava Lava flow SW’ Yenipınar 34.23360 38.15758 1825
Mt. Hasan 17-BF-19 Andesite lava Lava flow N′ Mt. Hasan summit 34.16737 38.13680 2730
Mt. Hasan HD [2] Composite pumice Fall-out N′ Mt. Hasan summit 34.16679 38.13065 3160

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

Uranium and Th isotopic ratios on bulk rock powders were determined at the U-series Research Laboratory at Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Approximately 0.2 g of powdered rocks were spiked with a 236U–229Th tracer solution and digested in a mixture of concentrated acids (HF–HNO3) in Teflon beakers at 190 °C for 66 hours. After digestion and dilution of the resultant solutions, U and Th were extracted from the rock matrixes using 4 ml columns of Biorad AG1-x8 anionic resin, introducing and eluting the samples in 7 N HNO3, and extracting the Th and U fractions in 6 N HCl and 0.2 N HNO3, respectively. Uranium and Th concentrations, determined by isotope dilution, and U–Th isotope ratios were measured separately on a Nu Instruments Nu Plasma MC-ICP-MS at Macquarie University. For U analyses, the New Brunswick Laboratory (NBL) synthetic standards U010 and U005a were used at regular intervals to assess the robustness of instrumental corrections and to monitor drift. For Th analyses, a standard-sample bracketing procedure for each sample analysed used the Th ‘U’ standard solution, and a linear tail correction for the 232Th tail on 230Th was applied. Sample 15-KVG-17 was duplicated as separate digestions that show good reproducibility in U and Th concentrations and activity ratios (see Supplementary Table 1 for data). One digestion of Table Mountain Latite (TML) was prepared and analysed with the samples, yielding data within error of reference values [3].

U–Th–Pb zircon analyses were performed at the HIP Laboratory at Heidelberg University. Samples were crushed and sieved (<125 μm) and zircon crystals were extracted by hydrodynamic separation and hand-picking. Adhering glass was dissolved by rinsing in cold 40% HF for ca. 3 minutes. Whole crystals were imbedded in indium (In) metal and their surfaces dated by U–Th disequilibrium methods (rim analyses) with a CAMECA ims 1280-HR SIMS at Heidelberg University. Crystals in equilibrium, within 1σ of (230Th)/(238U) = 1, were re-dated by U–Pb methods. Selected crystals were extracted from the In mounts, re-mounted in Epoxy resin, polished, and re-dated by U–Th disequilibrium and, if applicable, U–Pb methods (interior analyses). Analytical details are presented in Table 2, and data in Supplementary Table 3 (U–Th) and Supplementary Table 4 (U–Pb).

Table 2.

Zircon U–Th–Pb analytical details.

Main categories Specifications
Mounting types Indium & Epoxy
Sample preparation and treatment before SIMS analysis Work procedure (for Indium Mounts)
1. Standard imbedded, ground down & polished with SiC paper (FEPA# 800, 1200, 2400, 4000) & diamond paste (1 μm, 1/4 μm)
2. Samples imbedded, no grinding/polishing
3. Cleaned with EDTA + NH3, distilled water & methanol
4. Gold-coated (Quorum Q150T ES); Thickness of gold coating: 50 nm
Work procedure (for Epoxy Mounts)
1. Ground down & polished to ∼20 μm depth with SiC paper (FEPA# 800, 1200, 2400, 4000) & diamond paste (1 μm, 1/4 μm)
2. Cleaned with EDTA + NH3, distilled water & methanol
3. Gold-coated (Quorum Q150T ES); Thickness of gold coating: 2 nm
4. Cathodoluminescence imaged at scanning electron microscope
5. Cleaned with EDTA + NH3, distilled water & methanol
6. Gold-coated (Quorum Q150T ES); Thickness of gold coating: 50 nm
Age calibration approach Session-wise ThO+/UO+ relative sensitivity calibration using AS3 [4] & 91500 [5] reference zircons after [6]. For inter-session comparability, data presented in Supplementary Table 3 were re-calculated for secondary reference zircon AS3 to match unity.
Session-wise UO2+/U+ vs. 206Pb+/U+ relative sensitivity calibration using AS3 [4] reference zircons.
Analytical conditions U–Th conditions are described in [7]; U–Pb conditions in [8]
Beam diameter: U–Th ∼40 μm (Köhler Ap.: 400 μm); U–Pb ∼20 μm (Köhler Ap.: 200 μm)
Primary beam intensity: U–Th ∼10–70 nA; U–Pb ∼10–40 nA
Mass resolution (M/ΔM): ∼4000
Raster conditions (during pre-sputtering): U–Th 10 μm, 10 s; U–Pb 15 μm, 20 s
Note: U–Pb analysis spots were placed in U–Th analysis craters where both analyses were performed
Software to calculate ages ZIPS 3.1.1
Method to calculate ages U–Th: two-point isochron using zircon and equipoint (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 2)
U–Pb: 207Pb-corrected 206Pb/238U ages, disequilibrium-corrected using melt with Th/U = 3.148 for Mt. Erciyes and Th/U = 3.473 for Mt. Hasan samples (Supplementary Table 2)
Primordial lead model Surface contamination 207Pb/206Pb = 0.847 [9]
Standards AS3 (U–Th calibration, equilibrium; U–Pb calibration, 1099.1 Ma [4]),
91500 (U–Th calibration, equilibrium; U concentration, 81.2 ppm [5])
Secondary standards U–Th: AS3; session-wise weighted mean values were:
Session 2017_06: (230Th)/(238U) = 0.989; 1σ = 0.004; MSWD = 1.08; n = 73.
Session 2017_09: (230Th)/(238U) = 1.018; 1σ = 0.004; MSWD = 1.07; n = 57.
Session 2018_01: (230Th)/(238U) = 1.003; 1σ = 0.003; MSWD = 0.55; n = 78.
Session 2018_07: (230Th)/(238U) = 1.025; 1σ = 0.005; MSWD = 0.51; n = 44.
Session 2018_10: (230Th)/(238U) = 1.014; 1σ = 0.003; MSWD = 0.86; n = 119.
Session 2019_07: (230Th)/(238U) = 1.001; 1σ = 0.007; MSWD = 0.95; n = 19.
Session 2019_10: (230Th)/(238U) = 1.005; 1σ = 0.005; MSWD = 0.93; n = 49.
U–Pb: 91500; session-wise (weighted mean) values were:
Session 2017_06: 206Pb/238U Age = 1112 Ma; 1σ = 13 Ma; n = 1 (sample 15-KVG-19).
Session 2017_06: 206Pb/238U Age = 1056 Ma; 1σ = 18 Ma; n = 1 (samples 15-KVG-32, 15-KVG-34).
Session 2017_09: 206Pb/238U Age = 1060 Ma; 1σ = 36 Ma; MSWD = 0.01; n = 3.
Session 2017_10: 206Pb/238U Age = 1274 Ma; 1σ = 91 Ma; n = 1 (unreliable).
Session 2017_12: 206Pb/238U Age = 1086 Ma; 1σ = 47 Ma; n = 1 (sample 15-KVG-32).
Session 2017_12: 206Pb/238U Age = 1101 Ma; 1σ = 19 Ma; MSWD = 0.05; n = 3 (samples 15-KVG-37, 15-KVG-39).
Session 2018_01: 206Pb/238U Age = 1066 Ma; 1σ = 61 Ma; n = 1.
Session 2019_01: 206Pb/238U Age = 1051 Ma; 1σ = 10 Ma; n = 1.
Decay constants 9.1577 × 10−6 a−1 for 230Th [10], 4.9475 × 10−11 a−1 for 232Th [11], 9.8485 × 10−10 a−1 for 235U, and 1.55125 × 10−10 a−1 for 238U [12].

Acknowledgments

We thank Gokhan Atıcı, Esra Yurteri, and Mehmet Çobankaya for assistance in the field. This work was supported by DFG (German Research Foundation) grant SCHM2521/3-1.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary Tables 1–4 to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105113.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary Tables 1–4

The following XLSX file contains Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary Tables 1–4
mmc1.xlsx (154.9KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.NASA/METI . 2015. ASTER Glob. Digit. Elev. Model V002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schmitt A.K., Danišík M., Aydar E., Şen E., Ulusoy İ., Lovera O.M. Identifying the volcanic eruption depicted in a neolithic painting at Catalhöyük, Central Anatolia, Turkey. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scott S.R., Sims K.W.W., Reagan M.K., Ball L., Schwieters J.B., Bouman C., Lloyd N.S., Waters C.L., Standish J.J., Tollstrup D.L. The application of abundance sensitivity filters to the precise and accurate measurement of uranium series nuclides by plasma mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2019;435:321–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paces J.B., Miller J.D., Jr. Precise U-Pb ages of Duluth Complex and related mafic intrusions, northeastern Minnesota: geochronological insights to physical, petrogenetic, paleomagnetic, and tectonomagmatic processes associated with the 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift System. J Geophys Res B Solid Earth Planets. 1993;98:13997–14013. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wiedenbeck M., Hanchar J.M., Peck W.H., Sylvester P., Valley J., Whitehouse M., Kronz A., Morishita Y., Nasdala L., Fiebig J., Franchi I., Girard J.P., Greenwood R.C., Hinton R., Kita N., Mason P.R.D., Norman M., Ogasawara M., Piccoli P.M., Rhede D., Satoh H., Schulz-Dobrick B., Skår, Spicuzza M.J., Terada K., Tindle A., Togashi S., Vennemann T., Xie Q., Zheng Y.F. Further characterisation of the 91500 zircon crystal. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2004;28:9–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reid M., Coath C., Harrison T.M., McKeegan K. Prolonged residence times for the youngest rhyolites associated with Long Valley Caldera: 230Th-238U ion microprobe dating of young zircons. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1997;150:27–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schmitt A.K., Klitzke M., Gerdes A., Schäfer C. Zircon hafnium-oxygen isotope and trace element petrochronology of intraplate volcanic rocks from the Eifel (Germany) and implications for mantle versus crustal origins of zircon megacrysts. J. Petrol. 2017;58:1841–1870. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schmitt A.K., Grove M., Harrison T.M., Lovera O., Hulen J., Walters M. The Geysers - Cobb Mountain Magma System, California (Part 1): U-Pb zircon ages of volcanic rocks, conditions of zircon crystallization and magma residence times. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 2003;67:3423–3442. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marbach T. Th/U-disequilibria and elemental distributions, Heidelberg University; 2002. Fluid/rock interaction history of a faulted rhyolite-granite contact, eastern Rhine Graben shoulder, SW-Germany: alteration processes determined by Sr- Pb-isotopes. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng H., Edwards R.L., Hoff J., Gallup C.D., Richards D.A., Asmerom Y. The half-lives of uranium-234 and thorium-230. Chem. Geol. 2000;169:17–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Le Roux L.J., Glendenin L.E. Proc. Natl. Meet. Nucl. Energy, Pretoria, South Africa. 1963. Half-life of 232Th; pp. 83–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jaffey A.H., Flynn K.F., Glendenin L.E., Bentley W.C., Essling A.M. Precision measurement of half-lives and specific activities of 235U and 238U. Phys. Rev. C. 1971;4:1889–1906. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Tables 1–4
mmc1.xlsx (154.9KB, xlsx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES