Skip to main content
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences logoLink to Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
. 2020 Jan-Feb;36(2):32–36. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.2.1266

Prevalence of Pre Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among cement industry workers

Sultan Ayoub Meo 1,, Yasser Abdullah Bin Muneif 2, Nasser Abdullah BenOmran 3, Mohammad Abdullah AlSadhan 4, Raed Fuad Hashem 5, Abdullah Saud Alobaisi 6
PMCID: PMC6994864  PMID: 32063927

Abstract

Objectives:

Occupational and environmental pollution have become an imperative jeopardy for developing devastating metabolic diseases. Limited animal model studies have examined the impact of exposure to cement dust on metabolic conditions. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of pre-diabetes and Type-2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) among non-smoking cement mill workers.

Methods:

This epidemiological cross sectional study was conducted in the “Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia” during the period Oct 2016 to June 2017. Initially 310 cement mill workers were interviewed; after the interview and clinical history taking, 186 non-smoking cement mill employees were finally recruited. The cement mill employees were exposed to cement dust-related pollution in a cement industry for eight hours a day for six days a week. The mean age was 36.56 ± 0.78 years, mean BMI was 25.70 ± 0.29 m/kg2, and mean period of employment in the cement industry was 82.77 ± 6.95 months. HbA1c was measured using the Dimension Xpand Plus Integrated Chemistry System (USA).

Results:

The cement mill employees were divided into three groups: non-diabetics group, with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <5.7%; pre-diabetics group, with HbA1c 5.7-6.4%; and diabetics group, with HbA1c >6.4%. Among the cement mill personnel, 79 (42.47%) were non-diabetics, 28 (15.05%) were pre-diabetics, and 79 (42.47%) were diabetics. The prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM among cement mill employees was considerably associated with the period of employment in the cement industry (p=0.032).

Conclusions:

Exposure to cement dust was associated with an increased prevalence of pre- diabetes and T2DM among cement industry employees.

Keywords: Cement dust, Diabetes mellitus, Occupational settings, Prevalence

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing global community concern with multiple deplorable complications. Despite notable developments in health sciences, DM remains an incorrigible chronic illness.1 It involves and impairs multiple essential physiological functions2, body systems3 and accompanies different devastating complications.4 It is swiftly growing in developing and developed nations and has penetrated both rural and urban regions. About 425 million people worldwide are living with DM, and 212 million individuals with diabetes remain undiagnosed. About 279 million people are living in urban areas, while 146 million live in rural areas. Meanwhile, 327 million people with diabetes are at the peak of their waged age.5

Environmental pollution is a global concern as it is associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes.6 Globally, millions of individuals are working in industrial sectors, including cement factories, and are exposed to dust at various stages of the production processes. Cement dust mainly consists of “calcium oxide, silicon oxide, aluminum trioxide, ferric oxide, magnesium oxide, sand, and other impurities”.7,8 Exposure to cement dust remains an emerging problem and contributes to the development of respiratory9 and coronary artery diseases.10-12 Industrial workers who are frequently exposed to dust develop insulin resistance, glucose metabolism dysfunction, and Type-2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM).13,14 . Literature is acutely lacking to find out the prevalence of T2DM among cement industry workers. The existing studies primarily utilized animal models; therefore, this study, which is the first of its kind, aimed to assess the prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM among non-smoking male cement industry workers.

METHODS

Selection of Participants

This epidemiological cross sectional study was conducted in “Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, during the period Oct 2016 to June 2017. Cement industry workers who voluntarily participated and had same age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic background were selected. It was ensured that the cement industry workers had no previous history of working in plastic, steel, wood, welding, oil, and cotton factories. Initially, 310 cement mill employees of same exposure and duration levels were interviewed. These workers did not use personal protective measure; after history taking and examination, 186 (60%) non-smoking cement mill employees were recruited and 124 (40%) were excluded from the study. A large number of participants were excluded as they had a history of cigarette smoking, different socioeconomic condition, previous history of working in manufacturing factories other than cement, and had health issues.15,16 The cement industry employees were exposed to cement dust for eight hours a day for six days a week. The mean age was 36.56 ± 0.78 years, mean BMI was 25.70 ± 0.29 m/kg2, and mean employment duration in cement industry was 82.77 ± 6.95 months. A statistical power analysis was conducted to determine the sample size; within the anticipated prevalence of T2DM, the targeted population sample size was about 4,000 with 5% margin of error and 95% confidence level. The required sample size was 255, but only 186 cement factory workers were recruited in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

Cement mill employees with a known history of “anemia, blood transfusion, obesity, and asthma; personal or family history of DM; and malignancy” were excluded.15 Cement mill employees who smoked cigarette or shisha17 and previously worked in other manufacturing factories that produce dust or fumes were excluded, as smoking18 and dust increase the peril for DM.15,16

Blood Sample Collection

Cement mill workers were assigned a number; a 2-ml of blood was obtained by a para-medical staff member through a vein puncture procedure and was placed in a container with ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid. The identification number of employees was placed on the container, and the container was transported to the laboratory for the analysis of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).14

Measurements of Glycated Hemoglobin

The HbA1c was used to measure glycemic control within a period of 3-4 months. HbA1c played an essential role in the diagnosis of DM19. HbA1c was measured using the “Dimension Xpand Plus Integrated Chemistry System (USA)”.14 The “American Diabetes Association (ADA)” approach was applied; based on HbA1c levels, cement industry workers were divided into three groups. Cement industry workers with HbA1c <5.7% were classified as non-diabetics, those with HbA1c 5.7%–6.4% as pre-diabetics, and those with HbA1c >6.4% as diabetics.19

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board College of Medicine Reacher Centre, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (E 18-3654), written consent was obtained from the cement industry worker.

Statistical Analysis

The program SPSS Version 22 Microsoft Windows was used. Continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviations, while descriptive data were presented as numbers and percentages. The relationship between sociodemographic and period of employment in the cement factory was calculated using χ2 tests of independence. The significance level was presumed at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The sociodemographic physiognomies of the workers are presented in Table-I. Based on the 2018 ADA guidelines, the cement industry workers were divided into three groups: nondiabetics (HbA1c <5.7%), pre-diabetics (HbA1c 5.7%–6.4%), and diabetics (HbA1c >6.4%. About 79 (42.47%) workers were nondiabetics, 28 (15.05%) were pre-diabetics, and 79 (42.47%) were diabetics (Table-II).

Table-I.

Sociodemographic characteristics of cement industry workers (n=186).

Variables Mean (SDE)
Age (years) 36.56 ± 0.78
BMI (m/kg)2 25.70 ± 0.29
Exposure: months 82.77 ± 6.95
HbA1c % 6.31 ± 0.10

Values are expressed in mean ± SDE, BMI: Body Mass Index.

Table-II.

Prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM in cement industry workers (n=186).

Parameters Numbers and Percentage
Normal: HbA1c < 5.7% 79 (42.47%)
Pre-diabetic: HbA1c 5.7-6.4 % 28 (15.05%)
Diabetic: HbA1c > 6.4% 79 (42.47%)

Note: HbA1c values are presented based on American Diabetic Association Guidelines 2018.

T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin.

The prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM among cement mill workers was associated with employment duration in cement industry (Table-III). The mean duration of employment for nondiabetics was 65.49±8.41 months, that for pre-diabetics was 72.42±17.97 months, and that for diabetics was 103.72±12.24 months. The period of employment in cement industry was significantly associated with T2DM (p=0.032) (Table-II). The mean BMI of nondiabetics was 25.60 ± 0.48 m/kg2, that of pre-diabetics was 26.60 ± 0.75 m/kg2, and that of diabetics was 25.48 ± 0.40 m/kg2. There was no significant association between the BMI and T2DM (p=0.421) (Table-III).

Table-III.

Prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM in cement industry workers (n=186).

Variables Non-diabetics (n=79) Pre-diabetics (n=28) Diabetics (n=79) F-value P- value
Parameters HbA1c < 5.7% HbA1c 5.7-6.4 % HbA1c > 6.4%
Age (years) 33.64 ± 0.96 37.25 ± 1.82 39.24 ± 1.39 5.68 0.004
BMI (m/kg)2 25.60 ± 0.48 26.60 ± 0.75 25.48 ± 0.40 0.87 0.421
Exposure: months 65.49 ± 8.41 72.42± 17.97 103.72 ± 12.24 3.49 0.032

Note: Values are expressed in mean ± SD. HbA1c values are presented based on American Diabetic Association Guidelines 2018. BMI = Body Mass Index; SD = standard deviation; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin.

The age of non-diabetic’s workers was 33.64 ± 0.96 years; pre-diabetics, 37.25 ± 1.82 years; and diabetics, 39.24 ± 1.39 years. There was a significant association between age and T2DM (p=0.004) (Table-III). The association between the occurrence of pre-diabetes and T2DM with age and duration showed that employees who worked in a cement industry for a longer duration had higher age than those who worked in the same industry for a shorter duration.

DISCUSSION

DM is a leading health concern and its prevalence is increasing globally. DM has been previously documented to be due to genetics, sedentary lifestyles and unhealthy food habits. This novel study identified that the prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM significantly increased in cement industry workers.

Wang et al. (2014)20 identified that prolonged exposure to air pollution increases the risk of T2DM. Balti et al. (2014)21 investigated the association between pollutants and the occurrence of DM. The study showed that dust pollutants have a significant effect on the occurrence of DM. Park and Wang (2014)22 performed a systematic appraisal on air pollution and T2DM and showed that air pollution is a risk factor for TD2M. In another study, Eze et al. (2015)23 reported that persistent exposure to air pollution causes DM. Similarly, Weinmayr et al. (2015)24 reported that long-term exposure to road traffic pollution increases T2DM risk in general population.

Meo et al. (2018)15 piloted a study in occupational settings and reported that the prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM was significantly augmented among plastic industry employees. In another study, Meo et al. (2015)2 identified that air pollution is the main reason for the occurrence of insulin resistance and T2DM. This study identified that prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM among cement mill workers was significantly increased. The possible reason for this is that cement industry-associated dust pollution causes insulin resistance and ultimately lead to the development of DM.

Kelsall et al. (2018)25 determined TD2M and risk in the occupational and industry working population. In comparison to office workers and technical service providers, increased prevalence of DM was reported in numerous occupational groups who were employed in dust-generating factories. Moreover, blue-collar industry workers had a higher risk of DM. The occupations in which workers are exposed to high pollution are associated with a greater risk of DM. The effect of occupational pollutants and the mechanism underlying the onset of T2DM are very complex. The potential underlying mechanisms behind occupational exposure and T2DM are inflammation and insulin resistance. The occupational-associated pollutants contribute to oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, glucose metabolism impairment and TD2M.

Strengths of the study

This is the first human model study to examine the prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM among employees of the cement industry. The study exclusion criteria were highly consistent, and the study excluded smokers.

Limitations of the study

Although, it was attempted to recruit an adequate number of employees from a cement industry, most of the workers were cigarette smokers, obese, and differed in socioeconomic conditions; hence, a limited number of cement industry workers were recruited and evaluated to determine the association between exposure to cement dust and prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Occupational exposure to cement dust is associated with an increased prevalence of pre-diabetes and T2DM. The occupational health administrators must provide preventive measures to minimize the pollution from the cement factories in order to protect the workers and provide healthier industrial allied work-related conditions.

Authors’ Contributions:

SAM: Study design, supervised the project, data analysis and manuscript writing.

YAM, NAO, MAA, RFH, ASA: Literature review, subject selections and data collection,

All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2019/47), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Meo SA. Diabetes Mellitus:Health and Wealth Threat. Int J Diab Mellitus. 2009;1(1):42. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meo SA, Memon AN, Sheikh SA, Rouq FA, Usmani AM, Hassan A, et al. Effect of environmental air pollution on type 2. diabetes mellitus. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(1):123–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Olga NV, Susan TF, Xiaoxia Z, Joseph PW, Robert DF. Interactions of hearing loss and diabetes mellitus in the middle age CBA/ CaJ mouse model of presbycusis. Hear Res. 2009;249(1-2)):44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.007. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.James RG, Alberti KGMM, Mayer BD, Ralph AD, Allan D, Steven G. Report on the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:S5–S20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.International Diabetic Fedration-IDF diabetes atlas-8th edition. Available at http://www.diabetesatlas.org/key-messages.html . cited date May 14 2019.
  • 6.Radwan M, Dziewirska E, Radwan P, Jakubowski L, Hanke W, Jurewicz J. Air Pollution and Human Sperm Sex Ratio. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(4):907–912. doi: 10.1177/1557988317752608. doi:10.1177/1557988317752608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Oleru UG. Pulmonary function and symptoms of Nigerian workers exposed to cement dust. Environ Res. 1984;33:379–385. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(84)90036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ahn YC, Cho JM, Kim GT, Cha SR, Lee JK, Ok Y, et al. Physical, chemical and electrical analysis of dust generated from cement plants for dust removal with an electrostatic precipitator. Korean J Chem Eng. 2004;21(1):182–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meo SA, Al-Drees AM, AlMasri AA, Al-Rouq F, Azeem MA. Effect of duration of exposure to cement dust on respiratory function of non-smoking cement mill workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(1):390–899. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10010390. doi:10.3390/ ijerph10010390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li Y, Lane KJ, Corlin L, Patton AP, Durant JL, Thanikachalam M, et al. Association of Long-Term Near-Highway Exposure to Ultrafine Particles with Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes and Hypertension. See comment in PubMed Commons below. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):E461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050461. doi:10.3390/ijerph14050461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kojima S, Michikawa T, Ueda K, Sakamoto T, Matsui K, Kojima T, et al. Asian dust exposure triggers acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(43):3202–3208. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx509. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rong Y, Luo X, Zhang Z, Cui X, Liu Y, Chen W. Occupational exposure to asbestos and cardiovascular related diseases:A meta-analysis. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:920–926. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.10.005. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dendup T, Feng X, Clingan S, Astell-Burt T. Environmental. Risk Factors for Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1):E78. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010078. doi:10.3390/ijerph15010078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meo SA, Alsubaie Y, Almubarak Z, Almutawa H, AlQasem Y, Hasanato RM. Association of Exposure to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Radiation (RF-EMFR) Generated by Mobile Phone Base Stations with Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(11):14519–14528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114519. doi:10.3390/ijerph121114519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meo SA, AlMutairi FJ, Alasbali MM, Alqahtani TB, AlMutairi SS, Albuhayjan RA, et al. Men's Health in Industries:Plastic Plant Pollution and Prevalence of Pre-diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(6):2167–2172. doi: 10.1177/1557988318800203. doi:10.1177/1557988318800203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.White WB, Cain LR, Benjamin EJ, DeFilippis AP, Blaha MJ, Wang W, et al. High-Intensity Cigarette Smoking is Associated With Incident Diabetes Mellitus In Black Adults:The Jackson Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;12(7(2)):e007413. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007413. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.007413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim JH, Noh J, Choi JW, Park EC. Association of Education and Smoking Status on Risk of Diabetes Mellitus:A Population-Based Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(6):E655) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060655. doi:10.3390/ijerph14060655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim JH, Kim B, Kang JG, Kim BS, Kang JH. Association between cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus using two different smoking stratifications in 145 040 Korean individuals:Self-reported questionnaire and urine cotinine concentrations. J Diabetes. 2019;11(3):232–241. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12837. doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes:Standards of Medical Care in diabetes: Diabetes Care. 2018;1(Suppl1):S13–S27. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S002. doi:10.2337/dc18-S002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang B, Xu D, Jing Z, Liu D, Yan S, Wang Y. Effect of long-term exposure to air pollution on type 2 diabetes mellitus risk:a systemic review and Metaanalysis of cohort studies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171:173–182. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-0365. doi:10.1530/EJE-14-0365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Balti EV, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Yako YY, Kengne AP. Air pollution and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106:161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.08.010. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Park SK, Wang W. Ambient Air Pollution and Type 2 Diabetes:A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Research. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1:275–286. doi: 10.1007/s40572-014-0017-9. doi:10.1007/s40572-014-0017-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eze I, Hemkens LG, Bucher HC. Association between ambient air pollution and diabetes mellitus in Europe and North America:systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:381–389. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307823. doi:10.1289/ehp.1307823.OpenUrl. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weinmayr G, Hennig F, Fuks K, Nonnemacher M, Jakobs H, Mohlenkamp S, et al. Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter and incidence of type 2 adiabetes mellitus in a cohort study:effects of total and traffic-specific air pollution. Environ Health. 2015;14:53. doi: 10.1186/s12940-015-0031-x. doi:10.1186/s12940-015-0031-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kelsall H, Fernando PHS, Gwini SM, Sim MR. Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Risk Across Occupational Groups and Industry in a State Wide Study of an Australian Working Population. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(3):286–294. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Professional Medical Publications

RESOURCES