Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 23;9(12):770. doi: 10.3390/biom9120770

Table 4.

Recoveries of tylosin-spiked and tilmicosin-spiked testing by icELISA and HPLC-MS/MS (n = 3) a.

icELISA HPLC-MS/MS
Samples Spiked Spiked level
(ng/mL)
Measured
(ng/mL)
(mean ± SD b)
Recoveries
(%)
CV
(%)
Measured
(ng/mL)
(mean ± SD)
Recoveries
(%)
CV
(%)
Milk Tylosin 25 21.6 ± 1.6 86.4 7.4 20.16 ± 0.41 80.6 2.0
50 41.8 ± 6.0 83.5 14.4 34.15 ± 2.67 68.3 7.8
100 88.4 ± 5.4 88.4 6.1 78.61 ± 0.71 78.6 0.9
Tilmicosin 25 24.7 ± 2.2 98.7 8.9 28.67 ± 0.17 114.7 0.6
50 54.8 ± 2.0 109.5 3.6 55.05 ± 0.71 110.1 1.3
100 83.0 ± 3.5 83.0 4.2 114.35 ± 2.66 114.4 2.3
Drinking water Tylosin 5 4.6 ± 0.2 92.2 4.3 3.61 ± 0.41 72.1 11.3
10 7.6 ± 0.2 76.4 2.6 6.78 ± 0.91 67.8 13.4
20 19.8 ± 0.6 99.2 3.0 14.52 ± 1.18 72.6 8.2
Tilmicosin 5 4.4 ± 0.6 87.0 13.6 3.40 ± 0.27 67.9 7.9
10 9.1 ± 0.1 91.1 1.1 6.65 ± 0.03 66.5 0.5
20 17.2 ± 1.4 85.9 8.1 14.11 ± 0.81 70.6 5.7
Tap water Tylosin 5 4.1 ± 0.1 81.9 2.4 5.44 ± 0.01 108.7 0.1
10 8.3 ± 0.3 82.8 3.6 11.04 ± 0.72 110.4 6.6
20 17.7 ± 0.7 88.2 4.0 22.85 ± 0.18 114.3 0.8
Tilmicosin 5 4.2 ± 0.3 84.5 7.1 3.21 ± 0.14 64.3 4.3
10 8.0 ± 1.1 80.0 13.8 6.65 ± 0.21 66.5 3.2
20 18.8 ± 2.1 94.0 11.2 14.66 ± 0.45 73.3 3.1
Environmental water Tylosin 5 3.9 ± 0.1 77.2 2.6 4.29 ± 0.13 85.9 3.0
10 8.8 ± 0.3 87.9 3.4 9.57 ± 0.68 95.7 7.1
20 17.0 ± 0.2 85.1 1.2 18.37 ± 1.36 91.8 7.4
Tilmicosin 5 5.1 ± 0.1 101.7 2.0 3.24 ± 0.13 64.9 4.1
10 7.9 ± 0.1 79.2 1.3 8.10 ± 0.30 81.0 3.7
20 18.1 ± 1.2 90.3 6.6 15.20 ± 1.08 76.0 7.1

a The spiked positive samples were tested per concentration by icELISA and HPLC-MS/MS. b Standard deviation.