Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Feb 3;15(2):e0227649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227649

Gadolinium deposition in the brain of dogs after multiple intravenous administrations of linear gadolinium based contrast agents

Henning Richter 1,*, Patrick Bücker 2, Calvin Dunker 2, Uwe Karst 2, Patrick Robert Kircher 1
Editor: Quan Jiang3
PMCID: PMC6996830  PMID: 32012163

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effect of a linear gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) on the signal intensity (SI) of the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) in a retrospective clinical study on dogs after multiple magnetic resonance (MR) examinations with intravenous injections of gadodiamide and LA-ICP-MS analysis of a canine cerebellum after gadodiamide administration.

Animals

15 client-owned dogs of different breeds and additionally 1 research beagle dog cadaver.

Procedures

In the retrospective study part, 15 dogs who underwent multiple consecutive MR imaging examinations with intravenous injection of linear GBCA gadodiamide were analyzed. SI ratio differences on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images before and after gadodiamide injections was calculated by subtracting SI ratios between DCN and pons of the first examination from the ratio of the last examination. Additionally, 1 research beagle dog cadaver was used for LA-ICP-MS (Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) analysis of gadolinium in the cerebellum as an add-on to another animal study. Descriptive and non-parametrical statistical analysis was performed and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

No statistically significant differences of SI ratios, between DCN and pons, were detectable based on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images. LA-ICP-MS analyses showed between 1.5 to 2.5 μg gadolinium/g tissue in the cerebellum of the examined dog, 35 months after the last of 3 MRI examination with gadodiamide (two examinations at a dose of 1 x 0.1mmol/kg, last examination at a dose of 3 x 0.05mmol/kg).

Conclusion and clinical relevance

Although the retrospective MRI study did not indicate any visible effect of SI increase after multiple gadodiamide exposures, further studies based on LA-ICP-MS showed that the optical threshold was not reached for a potential visible effect. Gadolinium was detectable at a level of 1.5 to 2.5 μg gadolinium/g tissue by using LA-ICP-MS in the cerebellum 35 months after last MRI examination. The general importance of gadolinium retention of subvisible contents requires further investigation.

Introduction

In 2014 Tomori Kanda[1] published his work about signal intensity (SI) increase on unenhanced T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), causing hyperintensities in the dentate nucleus (DN)-to pons and globus pallidus to thalamus after consecutive injections of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). His important work was the beginning of an ongoing debate about the deposition of GBCAs in patient’s brains.[118] It is shown in numerous studies on humans and in a few animal studies that there is a positive correlation between SI increase on unenhanced T1 weighted MRI and the gadolinium concentration in the brain.[1925] Currently, the scientific interest focuses on the question whether all GBCAs or only a specific GBCA subtype is causing such hyperintensities. As free ionic gadolinium is toxic, GBCAs are applied as chelates. According to their chemical structure, two subtypes of GBCAs can be classified. GBCAs of the linear subtype partially and GBCAs of the macrocyclic subtype completely enclose gadolinium. On the one hand, the majority of studies provided evidence that linear GCBAs are stronger correlated with SI increase in the DN.[1, 37, 1315, 17, 18, 20, 2224, 2643] On the other hand, SI increase was described after macrocyclic GBCA administration in a few studies that were controversial discussed between specialists due to their limitations.[3, 5, 7, 8, 17] It seems that the molecular structure of the GBCA ligand, which defines the GBCA subtype, is a crucial factor for the SI increase on unenhanced T1 weighted MRI.[44]

In 2017, as a consequence of the scientific debate, regulatory authorities (EMA, European Medicine Agency; FDA Food and Drug Administration) decided about safety issues using GBCAs during clinical work-up, which resulted in divergent actions between EU and USA.[25] Based on a precautionary approach in the European Union nearly all linear GBCAs were removed from the market, while the FDA issued a class warning for all GBCAs.

Until now, the majority of published animal studies about this topic were performed on rodents[23, 24, 4549] the minority on large experimental animals.[25] So far, in veterinary medicine, no studies described a potential SI increase after multiple linear GBCA administrations in client-owned dogs. This species is of special clinical interest, as dogs will potentially face multiple MR examinations in veterinary medicine during treatment of tumors or during neurological diseases. Moreover, dogs play an indispensable role as animal model for translational research approaches. Therefore, the question arises if in dogs, similar to humans, an SI increase in the DCN is detectable after consecutive MR examinations or whether the number of GBCA administration is below the limit of detection for a visible SI increase on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images. This study followed the guidelines for standardized assessment of SI increase for retrospective MRI studies published from the European Gadolinium Retention Evaluation Consortium (GREC).[44]

In the current study, we aimed to retrospectively assess clinical data of dogs after multiple MRI examinations with intravenous administration of gadodiamide. Additionally, the brain of one dog, which was euthanized unrelated to this study, underwent an LA-ICP-MS measurement of gadodiamide 35 months after last MRI examination.[5052] We hypothesized that there is an increased hyperintensity on non-enhanced T1 weighted sequences in the deep cerebellar nucleus (DCN) of dogs after multiple gadodiamide administrations and a detectable gadodiamide retention in the cerebellum of dogs with LA-ICP-MS.

Material and methods

Dataset of patients

This restrospective study was performed on MR imaging data sets of 18 client-owned dogs presented between August 2012 and October 2017 at the Clinic for Diagnostic Imaging at the Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Zurich. Inclusion criteria was that the dogs had multiple (defined as two or more) MR examinations of the brain with intravenous administration of the linear GBCA gadodiamide at a dose of 0.15mmol/kg. Three patients did not undergo unenhanced T1-weighted imaging or were unreadable for study purposes and were excluded from this study. However, 15 client-owned dogs met the inclusion criteria and had a history of neoplastic or neurological disease as reason for MRI examination. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the all animals in the dataset is summarized in Table 1. All animals underwent general anesthesia during MRI examination based on a standard anesthesia protocol. After premedication with butorphanol and continious intravenous lactated Ringer’s infusion, general anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane combined in oxygen and air. One research beagle dog cadaver, which was euthanized unrelated to this study, was used for dissection and sampling of the whole brain. Accordingly, the additional organ sampling, which was an add-on to the main study purpose, applied 3R requirements and maximized the scientific output from the dog. LA-ICP-MS was used for determination of Gd-concentration in the cerebellum.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics.

animal BW [kg] number of GBCA applications cumulated dose [mmol/animal] time between last GBCA and last MRI [days] gender breed type of disease
1 11.2 2 3.36 254 female, neutered Spitz meningioma
2 33.0 2 9.90 169 male Labrador Retriever meningioma
3 37.0 3 16.65 98 male Boxer unspecified recurrent brain tumor
4 15.5 2 4.65 77 male, neutered franz. Bulldogge pituitary tumor
5 24.6 2 7.38 92 female, neutered Magyar Vizsla meningioma
6 6.0 2 1.80 137 female, neutered Jack Russel Terrier meningioma
7 13.2 2 3.96 582 male, neutered franz. Bulldogge cushing
8 1.8 2 0.54 138 male Yorkshire Terrier meningoencephalitis
9 22.8 2 6.84 83 female, neutered Katalanischer Schäferhund meningoencephalitis
10 29.0 2 8.70 24 male Boxer unspecified recurrent brain tumor
11 29.5 2 8.85 114 male, neutered Collie meningioma
12 22.7 2 6.81 374 male, neutered Labrador Retriever meningioma
13 35.5 2 10.65 135 male Boxer unspecified recurrent brain tumor
14 8.5 2 2.55 217 male, neutered Jack Russel Terrier pituitary tumor
15 22.4 3 10.08 106 female, neutered Labrador Retriever pituitary tumor
16 11.4 3 5.13 552 female beagle healthy
median 22.6 2 6.83 136      
min 1.8 2 0.54 24      
max 37.0 3 16.65 582      

Demographic and clinical characteristics of all dogs displayed with date of birth (DOB), age at last MRI [months], bodyweight (BW) [kg], number of GBCA applications, cumulated dose [mmol/animal], time between last GBCA and last MRI [days], gender, breed, and type of disease.

Imaging and data analysis

The analysis included whole-brain MR imaging obtained between 2016 and 2019 at the Vetsuisse Faculty Zurich. Imaging was performed with a 3.0-T MRI (Philips Ingenia, Philips Netherlands). Transverse unenhanced T1-weighted image parameters were as follows: Repetition time: 11.15–13.17 ms, Echo time: 5.116–6.125 ms, slice thickness: 0.7 mm, number of averages: 1, acquisition matrix: 0/228/227/0 and echo train length: 227.

Image analysis was performed independently by two of the authors (HR, PK). A picture archiving and communication system (Synapse® PACS, Fujifilm) was used for all reading sessions. Evaluation of the images, including analysis of ROIs and the mean SI values, was performed with open source medical image viewer (Horos based upon OsiriXTM, 64-bit medical image viewer for OS X, Version 3 (LGPL-3.0)). Pre- and postcontrast images were subjectively compared and analyzed regarding presence of signal alteration in the region of the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN). Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn on the unenhanced T1-weighted images on the central pons, and the DCN on both hemispheres. (Fig 1) The anatomically correct description of the DN in dogs is Nucleus lateralis cerebelli, which is the most prominent DCN. Accordingly, we use the more generalized term DCN instead of DN or Nucleus lateralis cerebelli to better reflect the canine anatomical situation. The correct placement of the ROI was confirmed by using T2-weighted images at the same section position for identification of the DCN in unclear cases. The DCN-to-pons SI ratio was calculated by using the following formula:

DCNtoponsSIratio=(meanSIofDCN)/(meanSIofcentralpons).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

T1 weighted unenhanced images a dogs brain in transversal orientation at the level of DCN; Colored circles indicate ROI at the Pons (proximal circles) and DCN (distal circles) in the left and right hemisphere A: first examination precontrast, B: second examination precontrast 105 days after first examination; related SI measurements of the ROIs showing measured area in mm2, Mean, Min, Max and SD of SI in the ROI.

The first and last MR examination of the dogs was used to calculate the SI ratio difference by substracting the first examination SI ratio from the last examination SI ratio.

Cadaver sample preparation

The research beagle dog was euthananized according to another unrelated study (animal license number ZH057/17) in accordance to Swiss animal welfare act. As an add-on to the main study, the dog's brain was harvested directly after euthanasia. The left brain hemisphere was coronally cut into 0.5–1.0 cm slices and cryopreserved (at 80°C). Deep cerebellar nuclei of the left cerebellum were cut into a 50-μm-thick section and fixed on a piece of cork with Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Finetek GmbH, Staufen, Germany). For chemical analysis, the deep cerebellar nuclei were cut in thin sections of 10-μm thickness with a cryotome and mounted on microscopic glass slides. Before the ablation process, microscopic images were recorded with a BZ-9000 inverted fluorescence/bright field microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The right hemisphere of the brain was formalin fixed (4% buffered formalin), paraffin embedded, and stored until further analysis.

Localisation of deep cerebral nuclei by bench-top μXRF

For the localisation of deep cerebral nuclei, an M4 Tornado bench-top μXRFinstrument (Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was used. The rhodium X-ray tube was supplied with a voltage of 50 kV and a current of 600 μA throughout the measurements. The emitted X-ray fluorescence was detected by a silicon drift detector (XFlash® 5030, Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Spatial resolution was approximately 25 μm. Each pixel was measured twice for 200 ms at a pressure of 20 mbar. The data was evaluated using the software ESPRIT HyperMap (Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany).

Standard preparation for LA-ICP-MS

For calibration, 11 matrix-matched gelatine standards in a concentration range from 0 ng/g to 600 μg/g were created. For this purpose, a 1000 μg/g gadolinium (Gd) ICP-MS standard (Fluka Analytical, St. Gallen, Switzerland) was diluted and combined with gelatine of highest purity (Grüssing GmbH, Filsum, Germany) resulting in standards with a gelatine content of 10% (w/w). The suspension was homogenized by heating the standards to a temperature of 50°C and the usage of a vortex mixer. Afterwards, 10 μm thin slices of each standard were prepared via a CryoStar NX70 Cryostat (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). The thin slices of the standards where then mounted onto a microscopic slide.

The Gd concentration in the gelatine standards was confirmed by ICP-TQMS (iCAP TQ, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) analysis of the digested standards. For digestion, 500 μL concentrated nitric acid (Merck Chemicals GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and 100 μL 35% (w/w) hydrogen peroxide (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) were added to around 50 mg of each gelatine standard. The mixture was then heated to a temperature of 70°C until complete digestion. Afterwards, the digests were diluted and a rhodium (Rh) ICP-MS standard (SCP Science, Baie-D’Urfe, Canada) was added as an internal standard. The concentration was determined using an external Gd calibration in a range from 0 pg/g to 30 ng/g consisting of 12 standards. Again, Rh was used as an internal standard.

LA-ICP-MS measurements

For elemental mapping of the Gd distribution, the hyphenation of an LSX 213 G2+ (Cetac Technologies, Omaha, USA) laser ablation system equipped with a HelEx II cell (Teledyne Cetac Technologies, Omaha USA) and an ICP-MS 2030 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used. For ablation, a spot size of 10 μm in combination with a stage speed of 30 μm/s was chosen. Laser energy was optimized for each individual sample to allow for quantitative ablation of the sample with minor ablation of the object slide. Ablated particles were washed out by a constant helium flow of 800 mL/min. For more efficient transportation, a daily tuned argon flow was added on the line to the micro torch of the ICP-MS system. A wet argon plasma with an RF power of 1200 W was used for the ionisation. The ionized analytes were led through a nickel interface and were analysed by an SQ-KED setup.

For quantification, the previously described matrix-matched Gd gelatine standards were used. On each standard, 11 lines with an ablation time of 20 s per line were ablated with the same parameters as used for the sample. The first line of each recording was discarded for consistency reasons.

All data evaluation was performed using the software ImaJar (developed by Robin Schmid, Muenster, Germany).

Statistics

Statistical data was analyzed by using SPSS (IBM® SPSS® Statistics, version 25, 64-bit-version, IBM, Chicago, Ill). Due to the limited number of available cases, data was defined as non-normally distributed and quantitative data was presented with median (range). Non-parametrical tests were used to compare SI ratio differences between 2 independent observers (Mann-Whitney U test). Inter-rater reliability was assessed based on Intraclass-Correlation-Coefficient (ICC) in a range from 0.0 to 1.0, whereby large numbers mean better reliability. One-sample t-tests were used to examine if the mean SI ratio differences between first and last examination were different from 0. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Cinical and demographic aspects

An overview about the demographic and cinical characteristic of the dataset is available provided as Table 1. The mean age of all dog patients included was 96.20 (31–157) months. The animals gender was divided as followed: male (5), male castrated (5), female castrated (5). As this was a restrospective clinical study, the dogs were of different breeds: Boxer (3), Border Collie (1), French Bulldog (2), Jack Russel Terrier (2), Catalan Scheepdog (1), Labrador Retriever (3), Magyar Vizsna (1), Spitz (1), Yorkshire Terrier (1). Contrast media injection protocols were the same for all animals, as they followed a clinical standard operation procedure with 0.15 mmol/kg gadodiamide for each MRI examination. The time between the MRI examinations was caused by the clinical work-up and was in median 136 (24–582) days.

Additionally, one research beagle dog cadaver was included into this study, which was euthanized for another unrelated study. The research beagle dog was used for different studies including repetitive gadodiamide administrations in MRI before his termination. It was a 52 months old, female castrated beagle dog with 11.4 kg body weight. The contrast media injections of the dog were as followed: November 2013 (0.1 mmol/kg gadodiamide), December 2013 (0.1 mmol/kg gadodiamide), June 2015 (3 x 0.05 mmol/kg gadodiamide). Accordingly, the last gadodiamide injection was 35 months before termination. Following the 3R requirements, the brain of the dog was sampled and used for chemical analysis, as this was not possible to perform with the retrospectively examined clinical patient population.

MRI data

Unenhanced T1-weighted imaging were independenly analyzed by two observers (HR, PK). A summary of all measurements are provided as Table 2. SI values of the DCN and Pons as well as the SI ratios and the SI ratio differences between the first and the last examination of the left and right hemisphere are summarized in Table 3. Based on non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests, no significant differences were detectable between both observers at a significance level of p< 0.05 (SI DCN left (p = 0.988), SI Pons left (p = 0.882), SI ratio left (p = 0.329), SI DCN right (p = 0.976), SI Pons right (p = 0.894), Si ratio right (p = 0.605), SI ratio difference left (p = 0.756), SI ratio difference right (p = 0.548).

Table 2. SI ratio differences.

  observer 1 oberver 2
animal SI DN left SI Pons left SI ratio left SI DN right SI Pons right SI ratio right SI ratio difference left SI ratio difference right SI DN left SI Pons left SI ratio left SI DN right SI Pons right SI ratio right SI ratio difference left SI ratio difference right
1 125.053 126.691 0.987 124.613 125.208 0.995   124.606 126.761 0.983 125.667 125.343 1.003  
1 277.428 281.183 0.987 280.295 287.391 0.975 0.000 -0.020 272.885 282.305 0.967 279.496 285.953 0.977 -0.016 -0.025
2 366.1 372.94 0.982 355.652 361.514 0.984   471.703 468.736 1.006 460.095 466.525 0.986  
2 362.487 359.643 1.008 360.836 355.127 1.016 0.026 0.032 362.179 360.978 1.003 357.583 361.620 0.989 -0.003 0.003
3 172.257 173.655 0.992 174.972 176.618 0.991   173.935 176.551 0.985 176.775 177.906 0.994  
3 178.492 183.944 0.970 179.350 184.430 0.972 -0.022 -0.018 179.023 183.55 0.975 175.918 186.732 0.942 -0.010 -0.052
3 422.66 449.613 0.940 437.129 459.989 0.950 -0.052 -0.040 419.148 455.787 0.920 429.200 458.764 0.936 -0.066 -0.058
4 175.919 172.502 1.020 172.275 175.804 0.980   172.698 175.878 0.982 173.125 175.544 0.986  
4 343.066 340.951 1.006 344.929 346.556 0.995 -0.014 0.015 349.659 342.713 1.020 350.028 348.415 1.005 0.038 0.018
5 614.737 628.453 0.978 639.614 647.677 0.988   622.014 632.662 0.983 634.766 652.891 0.972  
5 643.488 642.776 1.001 647.769 635.415 1.019 0.023 0.032 648.4 653.633 0.992 650.581 640.549 1.016 0.009 0.043
6 423.872 427.325 0.992 430.475 429.126 1.003   430.852 439.226 0.981 431.025 431.684 0.998  
6 1337.617 1308.215 1.022 1350.109 1308.886 1.031 0.031 0.028 1345.156 1341.79 1.003 1347.488 1345.814 1.001 0.022 0.003
7 997.558 993.47 1.004 995.635 1003.037 0.993   988.921 1000.341 0.989 998.839 1004.823 0.994  
7 590.895 589.339 1.003 580.894 577.059 1.007 -0.001 0.014 581.192 591.546 0.982 572.667 593.458 0.965 -0.006 -0.029
8 121.255 124.544 0.974 122.963 116.500 1.055   122.184 124.16 0.984 122.953 117.417 1.047  
8 149.632 134.637 1.111 129.449 129.388 1.000 0.138 -0.055 148.141 138.991 1.066 126.260 128.084 0.986 0.082 -0.061
9 97.817 88.727 1.102 95.320 90.399 1.054   98.402 90.347 1.089 95.379 90.695 1.052  
9 97.977 95.76 1.023 97.402 95.758 1.017 -0.079 -0.037 97.07 95.184 1.020 97.455 95.400 1.022 -0.069 -0.030
10 131.948 133.301 0.990 130.471 136.535 0.956   128 134.089 0.955 130.690 137.105 0.953  
10 120.822 125.631 0.962 121.811 123.667 0.985 -0.028 0.029 112.01 122.136 0.917 110.887 122.901 0.902 -0.037 -0.051
11 133.753 134.268 0.996 134.603 134.671 0.999   134.295 133.571 1.005 136.521 136.333 1.001  
11 129.713 124.613 1.041 129.773 121.503 1.068 0.045 0.069 130.938 126.121 1.038 127.061 122.018 1.041 0.033 0.040
12 76.143 78.517 0.970 77.633 78.761 0.986   73.75 78.213 0.943 76.652 79.258 0.967  
12 86.485 95.423 0.906 85.735 99.646 0.860 -0.063 -0.125 84.317 95.434 0.884 85.253 96.134 0.887 -0.059 -0.080
13 707.581 726.456 0.974 690.724 692.353 0.998   713.182 735.14 0.970 695.767 704.060 0.988  
13 626.935 637.184 0.984 611.346 622.576 0.982 0.010 -0.016 615.634 624.683 0.986 629.760 611.041 1.031 0.015 0.042
14 504.183 517.667 0.974 514.801 519.431 0.991   509.696 522.529 0.975 517.467 513.294 1.008  
14 136.327 138.181 0.987 137.012 139.957 0.979 0.013 -0.012 136.547 138.476 0.986 136.415 138.630 0.984 0.011 -0.024
15 101.85 96.083 1.060 101.685 94.867 1.072   103.259 96.485 1.070 103.662 96.792 1.071  
15 123.488 124.719 0.990 124.653 123.724 1.008 -0.070 -0.064 125.277 123.168 1.017 125.057 127.250 0.983 -0.053 -0.088
15 662.897 672.978 0.985 662.978 672.459 0.986 -0.075 -0.086 659.586 677.183 0.974 660.568 680.373 0.971 -0.096 -0.100
median     0.990     0.994 -0.001 -0.016     0.985     0.989 -0.006 -0.029
min   0.906 0.860 -0.079 -0.125   0.884 0.887 -0.096 -0.100
max     1.111     1.072 0.138 0.069     1.089     1.071 0.082 0.043

SI ratio differences from the two observers for each single dog, as well as median, min and max of each measurement

Table 3. Measurement data.

observer 1 observer 2 Mann-Whitney U test
measurement N minimum maximum mean standard deviation One-sample T-test minimum maximum mean standard deviation One-sample T-test p-value
SI DCN left 30 76 1338 358 307   74 1345 361 308   0.988
SI Pons left 30 79 1308 360 306   78 1342 366 311   0.882
SI ratio left 30 0.906 1.111 0.999 0.041 0.862 0.884 1.089 0.989 0.043 0.158 0.329
SI DCN right 30 78 1350 358 308   77 1347 361 310   0.976
SI Pons right 30 79 1309 359 305   79 1346 365 311   0.894
SI ratio right 30 0.860 1.072 0.997 0.039 0.701 0.887 1.071 0.991 0.040 0.227 0.605
SI ratio difference left 15 -0.079 0.138 -0.002 0.055 0.896 -0.096 0.082 -0.010 0.048 0.451 0.756
SI ratio difference right 15 -0.125 0.069 -0.011 0.051 0.402 -0.100 0.043 -0.021 0.045 0.098 0.548

Measurements of observer 1 and 2 displayed as mean, min, max and SD for DCN and Pons, SI ratio and SI ratio difference in the left and right hemisphere. One-sample t-test for both hemispheres, testing for differences from 1 (for SI ratios), respective from 0 (SI ratio differences). Additional p- values of the Mann-Whitney-U test comparing results of oberserver 1 and 2.

The ICC showed very good agreement between both observers (Table 3). For all analyses, ICC was between 0.863 (SI ratio difference right hemisphere)– 0.999 (SI DCN left, SI Pons left, SI DCN right, SI Pons right).

SI ratio DCN-to-pons showed no significant differences between left and right hemisphere (observer 1 (p = 0.390), observer 2 (p = 0.722)). SI ratio DCN-to-pons at the right hemisphere was measured in median with 0.997 (0.860–1.072) for observer 1 and 0.991 (0.887–1.071) for observer 2, and at the left hemisphere with 0.999 (0.906–1.111)) for observer 1 and 0.989 (0.884–1.089) for observer 2. (Table 4)

Table 4. Intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC).

ICC confidence interval
measurement hemisphere mean min max
SI DCN left 0.999 0.998 0.999
SI Pons 0.999 0.998 1.000
SI ratio 0.994 0.989 0.999
SI ratio difference 0.949 0.847 0.983
SI DCN right 0.999 0.998 1.000
SI Pons 0.999 0.998 0.999
SI ratio 0.910 0.811 0.957
SI ratio difference 0.863 0.592 0.954

Intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) between observer 1 and 2. Displayed as mean and confidence interval for SI measurements at the DCN and Pons, for SI ratios and SI ratio differences in the left and right hemisphere

SI ratio differences between the first and the last MRI examination of the patients showed no significant differences, whether at the left nor at the right hemisphere (observer 1 (p = 0.831), observer 2 (p = 0.163)). SI ratio differences between the first and the last MRI examination of the patients was measured at the right hemisphere in median with -0.011 (-0.125–0.069) for observer 1 and -0.021 (-0.100–0.043) for observer 2, and at the left hemisphere with -0.002 (-0.079–0.138) for observer 1 and -0.010 (-0.096–0.082) for observer 2. (Table 1) Based on a one-sample t-test, the first and the last MRI examination was tested to be significant different from 0. For both observers, no significant difference from 0 was found (observer 1: p = 0.896/0.402; observer 2: p = 0.451/0.098 [left/right]).

LA-ICP-MS data

Visual assessment of LA-ICP-MS analysis as well as a quantitative analysis was performed with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 220 ng gadolinium/g tissue and a limit of detection (LOD) of 67 ng/g. Gadolinium concentrations in the DCN of the research beagle dog could be determined between 1.5 to 2.5 μg gadolinium/g tissue, 35 months after last gadodiamide injection. In agreement with the visual assessment of the DCN, gadolinium levels were higher in the DCN than in the surrounding area of the DCN. A co-localisation of Gd and zinc (Zn) was detectable, both increasingly detectable in vessels, especially at the DCN. Furthermore, an anti-correlation with phosphorus (P) was detectable, which is visible in μXRF and LA-ICP-MS. The results are summarized in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Representative results for the LA-ICP-MS analyses of two cryo cerebellum samples of one dog treated with gadodiamide 35 months before euthanasia.

Fig 2

Anatomy is shown on histological and μXRF images. LA-ICP-MS results are displayed as quantitative distribution map of gadolinium (158Gd) and as qualitative distribution maps of phosphorus (31P), iron (57Fe) and zinc (66Zn). LA-ICP-MS analyses were performed with a laser spot size of 10 μm and a limit of detection at 67 ng/g (LOD). A clear colocalization of gadolinium and zinc displays in both samples.

Discussion

The current restrospective clinical study is the first study observing multiple gadodiamide applications in veterinary patients in a clinical set-up. The background of this study was the ongoing debate about the clinical relevance of hyperintensities of the DCN after multiple GBCA applications in humans. The hypothesis of this study was that there is a detectable increased hyperintensity on non-enhanced T1 weighted sequences in the DCN of dogs after multiple gadodiamide administrations and a measurable gadolinium retention in the cerebellum of dogs after chemical analysis based on LA-ICP-MS. The hypothesis has to be partially rejected.

This study showed 1) no hyperintensities on non-enhanced T1 weighted sequences in the clinical dog patients and 2) a Gd concentration of 1.5 to 2.5 μg gadolinium/g tissue in the brain of a research beagle dog 35 months after last gadodiamide injection.

With these findings, our study supports the hypothesis that a specific threshold is needed to identify hyperintensities on unenhanced T1-weighted images. It seems likely that the data of this dog patient population was not exposed to gadodiamide in an amount to exceed this threshold. With a median cumulative dose of 6.83 mmol/animal (range 0.54 to 16.65mmol/animal) the clinical dataset shows much less cumulative GBCA dose as compared to published reports from human medicine [1] or animal experiments.[53] Even if a superior brain clearance of macrocyclic GBCAs over linear GBCAs is described[54, 55] and all dogs of this study got a linear GBCA administration, the cumulative dose did not reach a visible level of hyperintensities after 2–3 administrations. We determined mean SI ratio differences between first and last MRI examination between 0.2% and 6.9% (range -12.5% to 13.8%), which was not significantly different from 0. (Table 1) This is much lower than in the study of Hu et al., were an SI increase between first and most recent MRI examination with an increase of 18.6% ± 12.7% (range 0.5% to 47.5%) for the DCN was reported.[14] In the study of Hu et al., human patients received a significant number of subsequent GBCA examinations, ranging between 5 and 37. Weberling et al. described a significant SI increase in the DCN after at least 5 consecutive GBCA injections of gadobenate dimeglumine.[13]

Although the retrospective MRI study did not indicate any visible effect of SI increase after multiple gadodiamide exposures, further studies based on LA-ICP-MS showed that the optical threshold was not reached for a potential visible effect. Most of the dog patients in this study had a history of neoplastic or neurological disease as reason for MRI examination (Table 1). In the patient records of the dogs, no side effects were linked with the contrast media application. This result is of clinical relevance for all current and future patients in veterinary medicine, which have a history of diagnosed brain tumors (such as meningiomas gliomas, nerve sheeth tumors, pituitary adenomas) or meningoencephalitis. Recurrent MRI examination are of interest in veterinary medicine mainly in dog patients after radiation therapy for follow ups and/or recidive pathologies. Our dataset showed that mostly not more than two MRI examinations with GBCA are performed during clinical work-up in veterinary medicine. This is a clear difference in comparison with human medicine, were more than 35 linear GBCA administrations to a single patient are reported.[18]

Even if there is no clinically visible hyperintensity on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images, this does not mean there is no deposition of gadolinium through gadodiamide application after multiple contrast media administrations in dogs. From human medicine it is known that approximately 6 injections of linear GBCAs are needed, before hyperintensities in the DCN become detectable on MRI[7, 56] On the other hand, gadolinium deposition was detectable after a single injection of linear GBCAs based on LA-ICP-MS measurments in the brain of sheep.[25] This study confirms gadolinium detection in the brain of a research beagle dog based on the chemical analysis of the Gd content. After three examinations, two times with 1x0.1 mmol/kg and once with 3x0.05 mmol/kg gadodiamide, Gd was measurable 35 month after the last administration. Accordingly, it could be shown in this study that the described Gd deposition in the brain of different species similarly occurs in dogs. Therefore, our findings support the hypothesis of irreversible or long lasting Gd deposition at the DCN. The current explanation about the pathomechanism is based on de-chelation effects of linear GBCA and transmetalation in co-localization with other elements, such as Fe, Co, Cu, Zn.[25, 57] We could show similar effects in the research beagle dog, which supports the ongoing discussion. As dogs are a widely used species for translational medicine and model for lots of pre-clinical studies during the approval of new medical products for human medicine, the results of our study should be recognized for all translational studies in future.

Even if the pathomechanism is not clarified at the moment and there are ongoing studies about differences between linear and macrocyclic GBCAs, from a scientific and ethical point of view it is mandatory to reduce the GBCA administration to the essential number with diagnostic importance for the patients. At the same time it is important to maintain the benefit of GBCA as long as there are no valuable alternative contrast media available. This should be done with respect to the risk of Gd deposition and its accumulation during recurrent contrast agent administrations.

As one of the limitations of this study, we have to mention that the number of patients and the number of gadodiamide administrations was lower than in comparable restrospective human studies. The reason is that in veterinary medicine dogs, as the most used private owned species, will not be imaged more often in MRI. This can be explained by the costs (payed by the owner) and the shorter life-span of a dog in comparison to humans. As our data reflects the daily business in a large university hospital, this was the maximum available data, which provides a relevant veterinary insight into this topic. Unfortunately, we did not have an MRI of the research beagle dogs brain, who had multiple gadodiamide administrations before euthanasia. This was caused by the fact that the brain of the dog was used as an add-on to another unrelated study which focused on other regions than the animals brain during MRI examination. It is a beneficial circumstance to have the results of the chemical analysis from this dog, even if there is no associated MRI of the brain. Based on the gained knowledge that an increased signal intensity of the brain might only be visible when the number of GBCA injections surpasses a certain threshold[34], it may have been questionable if this threshold would have been exceeded or not. According to the current knowledge, gadolinium first becomes visible in MRI if a threshold of approximately 1 μg gadolinium/g tissue is exceeded.[25] We assessed between 1.5 to 2.5 μg gadolinium/g tissue in the DCN of the research beagle dog, which would have caused a signal intensity change in MRI. Currently published case reports and research studies describe LA-ICP-MS as a useful tool to measure the quantities of retained gadolinium in human[19, 58, 59] and rodent tissues[47, 60]. Potential risk factors with effect on Gd retention described are ongoing neuroinflammation[60] or primary gliomas[59]. Additionally, any type of inflammation can negatively influence the blood brain barrier permeability[61] and therefore could be potential risk factor for gadolinium retention. In this study LA-ICP-MS was performed in the brain of a healthy research beagle dog, which was considered to be not influenced by clinical factors. On the other side the dataset of this study includes patients showing exactly such types of diseases with potential effect on gadolinium retention. The question how and in which quantity the underlying diseases or a reduced blood-brain-barrier influenced the gadolinium retention in the brain can not be estimated and has to be evaluated in further studies.

Another potential confounding factor for all clinical studies is the time between last GBCA administration and the MRI examination to detect hyperintensities in the DCN or until LA-ICP-MS measurement of gadolinium, as this time is crucial to differentiate between the soluble and insoluble form of gadolinium. In this study the median number of days between last GBCA application and MRI examination was 136 (range 24 to 582days). Accordingly there was enough gadolinium-free-time to detect insoluble gadolinium deposits only.

In conclusion, we could show that no hyperintensities on non-enhanced T1 weighted sequences in the clinical dog patients after 2–3 gadodiamide administrations of 0.1 mmol/kg were detactable and that between 1.5 to 2.5 μg gadolinium/g tissue could be determined in the brain of a research beagle dog 35 months after his last gadodiamide injection. The importance and clinical relevance of gadolinium retention of subvisible contents, the pathomechanism and the potential side effects based on Gd deposition still requires further investigation.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Manuela Schnyder, Institute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University Zurich for interdisciplinary collaboration and Prof. Dr. Alexander Radbruch, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen as well as PD Dr. Astrid Jeibmann, Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster for supporting the study and Lydia Bruckbauer, Gianna Ribbers and Andrea Rothaus for expert technical support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology. 2014;270(3):834–41. 10.1148/radiol.13131669 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adin ME, Kleinberg L, Vaidya D, Zan E, Mirbagheri S, Yousem DM. Hyperintense Dentate Nuclei on T1-Weighted MRI: Relation to Repeat Gadolinium Administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(10):1859–65. 10.3174/ajnr.A4378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cao Y, Huang DQ, Shih G, Prince MR. Signal Change in the Dentate Nucleus on T1-Weighted MR Images After Multiple Administrations of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Versus Gadobutrol. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(2):414–9. 10.2214/AJR.15.15327 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Errante Y, Cirimele V, Mallio CA, Di Lazzaro V, Zobel BB, Quattrocchi CC. Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity of the dentate nucleus on unenhanced magnetic resonance images is associated with cumulative doses of intravenously administered gadodiamide in patients with normal renal function, suggesting dechelation. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(10):685–90. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000072 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kanda T, Osawa M, Oba H, Toyoda K, Kotoku J, Haruyama T, et al. High Signal Intensity in Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Association with Linear versus Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate Administration. Radiology. 2015;275(3):803–9. 10.1148/radiol.14140364 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Quattrocchi CC, Mallio CA, Errante Y, Cirimele V, Carideo L, Ax A, et al. Gadodiamide and Dentate Nucleus T1 Hyperintensity in Patients With Meningioma Evaluated by Multiple Follow-Up Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Examinations With No Systemic Interval Therapy. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(7):470–2. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000154 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Radbruch A, Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, Eidel O, Burth S, Kickingereder P, et al. Gadolinium retention in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus is dependent on the class of contrast agent. Radiology. 2015;275(3):783–91. 10.1148/radiol.2015150337 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Radbruch A, Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, Hepp J, Kickingereder P, Wick W, et al. High-Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images: Evaluation of the Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Gadobutrol. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(12):805–10. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000227 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramalho J, Castillo M, AlObaidy M, Nunes RH, Ramalho M, Dale BM, et al. High Signal Intensity in Globus Pallidus and Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Evaluation of Two Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. Radiology. 2015;276(3):836–44. 10.1148/radiol.2015150872 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ramalho J, Semelka RC, AlObaidy M, Ramalho M, Nunes RH, Castillo M. Signal intensity change on unenhanced T1-weighted images in dentate nucleus following gadobenate dimeglumine in patients with and without previous multiple administrations of gadodiamide. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(11):4080–8. 10.1007/s00330-016-4269-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stojanov DA, Aracki-Trenkic A, Vojinovic S, Benedeto-Stojanov D, Ljubisavljevic S. Increasing signal intensity within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1W magnetic resonance images in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: correlation with cumulative dose of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, gadobutrol. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(3):807–15. 10.1007/s00330-015-3879-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tedeschi E, Palma G, Canna A, Cocozza S, Russo C, Borrelli P, et al. In vivo dentate nucleus MRI relaxometry correlates with previous administration of Gadolinium-based contrast agents. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(12):4577–84. 10.1007/s00330-016-4245-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, Kickingereder P, Wick W, Bendszus M, Schlemmer HP, et al. Increased Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images After Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(11):743–8. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000206 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hu HH, Pokorney A, Towbin RB, Miller JH. Increased signal intensities in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted images: evidence in children undergoing multiple gadolinium MRI exams. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(11):1590–8. 10.1007/s00247-016-3646-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flood TF, Stence NV, Maloney JA, Mirsky DM. Pediatric Brain: Repeated Exposure to Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Material Is Associated with Increased Signal Intensity at Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging. Radiology. 2017;282(1):222–8. 10.1148/radiol.2016160356 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cao Y, Zhang Y, Shih G, Zhang Y, Bohmart A, Hecht EM, et al. Effect of Renal Function on Gadolinium-Related Signal Increases on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(11):677–82. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000294 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Radbruch A, Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, Hepp J, Kickingereder P, Wick W, et al. Intraindividual Analysis of Signal Intensity Changes in the Dentate Nucleus After Consecutive Serial Applications of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(11):683–90. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000308 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Y, Cao Y, Shih GL, Hecht EM, Prince MR. Extent of Signal Hyperintensity on Unenhanced T1-weighted Brain MR Images after More than 35 Administrations of Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. Radiology. 2017;282(2):516–25. 10.1148/radiol.2016152864 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kanda T, Fukusato T, Matsuda M, Toyoda K, Oba H, Kotoku J, et al. Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent Accumulates in the Brain Even in Subjects without Severe Renal Dysfunction: Evaluation of Autopsy Brain Specimens with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy. Radiology. 2015;276(1):228–32. 10.1148/radiol.2015142690 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, et al. Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Radiology. 2015;275(3):772–82. 10.1148/radiol.15150025 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Murata N, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Murata K, Fligner C, Dills R, Hippe D, et al. Macrocyclic and Other Non-Group 1 Gadolinium Contrast Agents Deposit Low Levels of Gadolinium in Brain and Bone Tissue: Preliminary Results From 9 Patients With Normal Renal Function. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(7):447–53. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000252 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jost G, Lenhard DC, Sieber MA, Lohrke J, Frenzel T, Pietsch H. Signal Increase on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images in the Rat Brain After Repeated, Extended Doses of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: Comparison of Linear and Macrocyclic Agents. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(2):83–9. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Robert P, Lehericy S, Grand S, Violas X, Fretellier N, Idee JM, et al. T1-Weighted Hypersignal in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei After Repeated Administrations of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Healthy Rats: Difference Between Linear and Macrocyclic Agents. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(8):473–80. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Robert P, Violas X, Grand S, Lehericy S, Idee JM, Ballet S, et al. Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Are Associated With Brain Gadolinium Retention in Healthy Rats. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(2):73–82. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Radbruch A, Richter H, Fingerhut S, Martin LF, Xia A, Henze N, et al. Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain in a Large Animal Model: Comparison of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. Invest Radiol. 2019;54(9):531–6. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000575 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miller JH, Hu HH, Pokorney A, Cornejo P, Towbin R. MRI Brain Signal Intensity Changes of a Child During the Course of 35 Gadolinium Contrast Examinations. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):e1637–40. 10.1542/peds.2015-2222 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramalho J, Ramalho M, AlObaidy M, Nunes RH, Castillo M, Semelka RC. T1 Signal-Intensity Increase in the Dentate Nucleus after Multiple Exposures to Gadodiamide: Intraindividual Comparison between 2 Commonly Used Sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(8):1427–31. 10.3174/ajnr.A4757 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roberts DR, Chatterjee AR, Yazdani M, Marebwa B, Brown T, Collins H, et al. Pediatric Patients Demonstrate Progressive T1-Weighted Hyperintensity in the Dentate Nucleus following Multiple Doses of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(12):2340–7. 10.3174/ajnr.A4891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tanaka M, Nakahara K, Kinoshita M. Increased Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Comparison with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder after Multiple Doses of Gadolinium Contrast. Eur Neurol. 2016;75(3–4):195–8. 10.1159/000445431 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roberts DR, Holden KR. Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images in the pediatric brain exposed to multiple doses of gadolinium contrast. Brain Dev. 2016;38(3):331–6. 10.1016/j.braindev.2015.08.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khant ZA, Hirai T, Kadota Y, Masuda R, Yano T, Azuma M, et al. T1 Shortening in the Cerebral Cortex after Multiple Administrations of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017;16(1):84–6. 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eisele P, Alonso A, Szabo K, Ebert A, Ong M, Schoenberg SO, et al. Lack of increased signal intensity in the dentate nucleus after repeated administration of a macrocyclic contrast agent in multiple sclerosis: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(39):e4624 10.1097/MD.0000000000004624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schlemm L, Chien C, Bellmann-Strobl J, Dorr J, Wuerfel J, Brandt AU, et al. Gadopentetate but not gadobutrol accumulates in the dentate nucleus of multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 2017;23(7):963–72. 10.1177/1352458516670738 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Radbruch A, Haase R, Kieslich PJ, Weberling LD, Kickingereder P, Wick W, et al. No Signal Intensity Increase in the Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images after More than 20 Serial Injections of Macrocyclic Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. Radiology. 2017;282(3):699–707. 10.1148/radiol.2016162241 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kuno H, Jara H, Buch K, Qureshi MM, Chapman MN, Sakai O. Global and Regional Brain Assessment with Quantitative MR Imaging in Patients with Prior Exposure to Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. Radiology. 2017;283(1):195–204. 10.1148/radiol.2016160674 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Radbruch A, Haase R, Kickingereder P, Baumer P, Bickelhaupt S, Paech D, et al. Pediatric Brain: No Increased Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images after Consecutive Exposure to a Macrocyclic Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent. Radiology. 2017;283(3):828–36. 10.1148/radiol.2017162980 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Omiya Y, Onishi H. Contrast Agent-Induced High Signal Intensity in Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images: Comparison of Gadodiamide and Gadoxetic Acid. Invest Radiol. 2017;52(7):389–95. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000360 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rossi Espagnet MC, Bernardi B, Pasquini L, Figa-Talamanca L, Toma P, Napolitano A. Signal intensity at unenhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance in the globus pallidus and dentate nucleus after serial administrations of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(10):1345–52. 10.1007/s00247-017-3874-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roberts DR, Welsh CA, LeBel DP, 2nd, Davis WC. Distribution map of gadolinium deposition within the cerebellum following GBCA administration. Neurology. 2017;88(12):1206–8. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003735 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eisele P, Konstandin S, Szabo K, Ong M, Zollner F, Schad LR, et al. Sodium MRI of T1 High Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus due to Gadolinium Deposition in Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27(4):372–5. 10.1111/jon.12448 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Young JR, Orosz I, Franke MA, Kim HJ, Woodworth D, Ellingson BM, et al. Gadolinium deposition in the paediatric brain: T1-weighted hyperintensity within the dentate nucleus following repeated gadolinium-based contrast agent administration. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(3):290–5. 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moser FG, Watterson CT, Weiss S, Austin M, Mirocha J, Prasad R, et al. High Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted MR Images: Comparison between Gadobutrol and Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(3):421–6. 10.3174/ajnr.A5538 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Quattrocchi CC, Errante Y, Mallio CA, Marinelli L, LoVullo G, Giannotti G, et al. Effect of Age on High T1 Signal Intensity of the Dentate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus in a Large Population Exposed to Gadodiamide. Invest Radiol. 2018;53(4):214–22. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000431 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Quattrocchi CC, Ramalho J, van der Molen AJ, Rovira A, Radbruch A, Grec EGREC, et al. Standardized assessment of the signal intensity increase on unenhanced T1-weighted images in the brain: the European Gadolinium Retention Evaluation Consortium (GREC) Task Force position statement. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(8):3959–67. 10.1007/s00330-018-5803-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rasschaert M, Idee JM, Robert P, Fretellier N, Vives V, Violas X, et al. Moderate Renal Failure Accentuates T1 Signal Enhancement in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei of Gadodiamide-Treated Rats. Invest Radiol. 2017;52(5):255–64. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jost G, Frenzel T, Lohrke J, Lenhard DC, Naganawa S, Pietsch H. Penetration and distribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents into the cerebrospinal fluid in healthy rats: a potential pathway of entry into the brain tissue. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(7):2877–85. 10.1007/s00330-016-4654-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gianolio E, Bardini P, Arena F, Stefania R, Di Gregorio E, Iani R, et al. Gadolinium Retention in the Rat Brain: Assessment of the Amounts of Insoluble Gadolinium-containing Species and Intact Gadolinium Complexes after Repeated Administration of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. Radiology. 2017;285(3):839–49. 10.1148/radiol.2017162857 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lohrke J, Frisk AL, Frenzel T, Schockel L, Rosenbruch M, Jost G, et al. Histology and Gadolinium Distribution in the Rodent Brain After the Administration of Cumulative High Doses of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. Invest Radiol. 2017;52(6):324–33. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Robert P, Fingerhut S, Factor C, Vives V, Letien J, Sperling M, et al. One-year Retention of Gadolinium in the Brain: Comparison of Gadodiamide and Gadoterate Meglumine in a Rodent Model. Radiology. 2018;288(2):424–33. 10.1148/radiol.2018172746 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Feldmann J, Kindness A, Ek P. Laser ablation of soft tissue using a cryogenically cooled ablation cell. J Anal Atom Spectrom. 2002;17(8):813–8. 10.1039/b201960d WOS:000177254600010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bishop DP, Clases D, Fryer F, Williams E, Wilkins S, Hare DJ, et al. Elemental bio-imaging using laser ablation-triple quadrupole-ICP-MS. J Anal Atom Spectrom. 2016;31(1):197–202. 10.1039/c5ja00293a WOS:000367315200015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fingerhut S, Niehoff AC, Sperling M, Jeibmann A, Paulus W, Niederstadt T, et al. Spatially resolved quantification of gadolinium deposited in the brain of a patient treated with gadolinium-based contrast agents. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018;45:125–30. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.10.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Boyken J, Frenzel T, Lohrke J, Jost G, Pietsch H. Gadolinium Accumulation in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei and Globus Pallidus After Exposure to Linear but Not Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in a Retrospective Pig Study With High Similarity to Clinical Conditions. Invest Radiol. 2018;53(5):278–85. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Frenzel T, Apte C, Jost G, Schockel L, Lohrke J, Pietsch H. Quantification and Assessment of the Chemical Form of Residual Gadolinium in the Brain After Repeated Administration of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: Comparative Study in Rats. Invest Radiol. 2017;52(7):396–404. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kartamihardja AA, Nakajima T, Kameo S, Koyama H, Tsushima Y. Distribution and clearance of retained gadolinium in the brain: differences between linear and macrocyclic gadolinium based contrast agents in a mouse model. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1066):20160509 10.1259/bjr.20160509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Quattrocchi CC, Mallio CA, Errante Y, Beomonte Zobel B. High T1 Signal Intensity in Dentate Nucleus after Multiple Injections of Linear Gadolinium Chelates. Radiology. 2015;276(2):616–7. 10.1148/radiol.2015150464 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Korkusuz H, Ulbrich K, Welzel K, Koeberle V, Watcharin W, Bahr U, et al. Transferrin-coated gadolinium nanoparticles as MRI contrast agent. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013;15(2):148–54. 10.1007/s11307-012-0579-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.El-Khatib AH, Radbruch H, Trog S, Neumann B, Paul F, Koch A, et al. Gadolinium in human brain sections and colocalization with other elements. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2019;6(1):e515 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kiviniemi A, Gardberg M, Ek P, Frantzen J, Bobacka J, Minn H. Gadolinium retention in gliomas and adjacent normal brain tissue: association with tumor contrast enhancement and linear/macrocyclic agents. Neuroradiology. 2019;61(5):535–44. 10.1007/s00234-019-02172-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang S, Hesse B, Roman M, Stier D, Castillo-Michel H, Cotte M, et al. Increased Retention of Gadolinium in the Inflamed Brain After Repeated Administration of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Mice Combining ICP-MS and Micro- and Nano-SR-XRF. Invest Radiol. 2019;54(10):617–26. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000571 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Varatharaj A, Galea I. The blood-brain barrier in systemic inflammation. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;60:1–12. 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.03.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES