Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2019 Nov 19;182(2):792–806. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00792

NatB-Mediated N-Terminal Acetylation Affects Growth and Biotic Stress Responses1

Monika Huber a, Willy V Bienvenut b, Eric Linster a, Iwona Stephan a, Laura Armbruster a, Carsten Sticht c, Dominik Layer d, Karine Lapouge d, Thierry Meinnel b, Irmgard Sinning d, Carmela Giglione b,2, Ruediger Hell a, Markus Wirtz a,2,3
PMCID: PMC6997699  PMID: 31744933

Initiator methionine acetylation by NatB is evolutionary conserved and critical for abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Abstract

N-terminal acetylation (NTA) is one of the most abundant protein modifications in eukaryotes. In humans, NTA is catalyzed by seven Nα-acetyltransferases (NatA–F and NatH). Remarkably, the plant Nat machinery and its biological relevance remain poorly understood, although NTA has gained recognition as a key regulator of crucial processes such as protein turnover, protein-protein interaction, and protein targeting. In this study, we combined in vitro assays, reverse genetics, quantitative N-terminomics, transcriptomics, and physiological assays to characterize the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) NatB complex. We show that the plant NatB catalytic (NAA20) and auxiliary subunit (NAA25) form a stable heterodimeric complex that accepts canonical NatB-type substrates in vitro. In planta, NatB complex formation was essential for enzymatic activity. Depletion of NatB subunits to 30% of the wild-type level in three Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutants (naa20-1, naa20-2, and naa25-1) caused a 50% decrease in plant growth. A complementation approach revealed functional conservation between plant and human catalytic NatB subunits, whereas yeast NAA20 failed to complement naa20-1. Quantitative N-terminomics of approximately 1000 peptides identified 32 bona fide substrates of the plant NatB complex. In vivo, NatB was seen to preferentially acetylate N termini starting with the initiator Met followed by acidic amino acids and contributed 20% of the acetylation marks in the detected plant proteome. Global transcriptome and proteome analyses of NatB-depleted mutants suggested a function of NatB in multiple stress responses. Indeed, loss of NatB function, but not NatA, increased plant sensitivity toward osmotic and high-salt stress, indicating that NatB is required for tolerance of these abiotic stressors.


Nα-terminal acetylation (NTA) is a global proteome imprinting mechanism conserved in all three domains of life and affecting up to 60% of the soluble yeast proteins and 80% to 90% of the soluble proteins in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and humans (Polevoda and Sherman, 2003; Falb et al., 2006; Arnesen et al., 2009a; Bienvenut et al., 2012). Despite the prevalent frequency of N-terminal acetylation marks in the proteomes of multicellular eukaryotes, the general function of NTA is still discussed controversially. Whereas for individual proteins, NTA has been shown to affect folding, aggregation, subcellular localization, degradation, and protein-protein interactions, the overall significance of NTA remains enigmatic (Aksnes et al., 2016).

NTA is catalyzed by N-terminal acetyltransferase (Nat) complexes consisting of at least one catalytic subunit and one facultative auxiliary subunit. The auxiliary subunits are in some cases required for catalytic activity and anchor the catalytic subunit to the ribosome (Aksnes et al., 2015a, 2019). Since all five yeast Nat complexes, NatA to NatE, are ribosome associated and no deacetylases acting on the N terminus are known, NTA has long been viewed as a static cotranslational modification targeting mostly cytosolic proteins (Polevoda et al., 2009; Arnesen, 2011; Giglione et al., 2015). This dogma is challenged by the recent identification of many partially acetylated proteins and posttranslational NTA via the Nat complexes NatF to NatH in multicellular eukaryotes (Linster and Wirtz, 2018; Aksnes et al., 2019).

In humans, the Golgi-associated NatF and the cytosolic NatH control the acetylation of membrane proteins as well as cytoskeleton assembly and cell motility (Drazic et al., 2018). Whereas a NatH homolog is absent in the plant lineage of eukaryotes, a potential homolog of NatF is present in the Arabidopsis genome. The function of the human and plant NatF might differ, since the most relevant phenotype of NatF-depleted human cells is the disruption of the Golgi association with the nucleus (Aksnes et al., 2015b), a feature that plant cells inherently lack (Dupree and Sherrier, 1998). NatG is a plant-specific acetyltransferase that localizes to the plastids, where it acetylates N termini of plastid-encoded as well as imported nuclear-encoded proteins (Dinh et al., 2015). These differences in the posttranslationally acting NTA machinery of plants and humans suggest specific adaptations of the NTA in photo-autotrophic eukaryotes and allow for questioning the conservation of the ribosome-associated NTA machinery in eukaryotes.

In a recent study, we demonstrated that the drought-stress-related phytohormone abscisic acid quickly depleted NatA abundance and thereby altered the plasticity of N-terminal protein acetylation. Remarkably, down-regulation of NatA by genetic engineering resulted in constitutive activation of the abscisic acid response and, consequently, drought-resistant plants (Linster et al., 2015). These findings suggest that NTA in plants is not static but a highly dynamic process, which responds to environmental cues and contributes to the regulation of stress responses. Such active control of NTA has not been observed in other eukaryotes yet and might constitute an adaptation to the sessile lifestyle of plants that forces them to cope with a variety of biotic and abiotic perturbations (Linster and Wirtz, 2018). However, the substrate specificity and the functions of the catalytically active (NAA10) and the ribosome anchor subunit (NAA15) of NatA are conserved between plants and humans (Linster et al., 2015).

NatA acetylates N termini of nascent polypeptide chains after removal of the initiator Met (iMet) by Met aminopeptidases (Frottin et al., 2006). By contrast, NatB recognizes the iMet when it is followed by the acidic amino acids Asp or Glu or its amidated analogs Asn and Gln in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and human (Homo sapiens; Aksnes et al., 2019). Orthologous proteins of the NatB subunits NAA20 (At1g03150) and NAA25 (At5g58450) are encoded in the Arabidopsis genome (Bienvenut et al., 2012; Ferrández-Ayela et al., 2013), but the substrate specificity of this potential plant NatB complex is unknown. Recently, NatB was shown to accept the plant immune receptor SNC1 (Suppressor of NPR1, Constitutive1) as a substrate, when the alternative translation of the SNC1 protein usually starting with MMD generates the MD-SNC1 variant. Since NatA recognizes MMD-SNC1, the SNC1 protein is acetylated either by NatA or NatB, which defines SNC1 as an unusual case for substrate recognition by Nat complexes. By controlling the stability of SNC1, NatB contributed in the defense response to the pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis Noco2 (Xu et al., 2015).

Up to now, it was unclear if NatB is also involved in the control of plant abiotic stress responses and if the substrate specificity and the complex stoichiometry of NatB are conserved in plants.

In this study, biochemical characterization of the potential Arabidopsis NatB subunits NAA20 and NAA25 revealed that they form in vitro a stable heterodimeric complex, which accepts canonical NatB-type substrates found in other eukaryotes. We show that T-DNA insertions in the NatB mutants did not cause full inactivation but depletion of NatB subunits to 30% of wild-type level. This NatB depletion caused significant retardation of growth, which leads to the hypothesis that NatB is indispensable in plants. N terminal acetylome profiling of the wild-type and AtNatB-depleted mutants characterized 1,736 total N termini, including 738 unique protein entries. The dataset allowed comparison of the quantification of the acetylation level of 247 unique proteoforms in either genotype with the wild type. Out of these proteoforms, 70% (514) were substrates of the N-terminal Met excision process and 30% (224) did not undergo removal of the first Met (iMet). The comparison of NTA frequency in wild type and NatB-depleted plants identified 35 NatB substrates, which were most sensitive to depletion of NatB activity and unraveled significant conservation of the NatB substrate specificity in eukaryotes.

Remarkably, NatB-mediated proteome imprinting is essential for adaptation to salt and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. The global transcriptome and proteomic analyses of NatB mutants reinforce the role of AtNatB in cellular stress responses and provide a valuable resource to screen for other metabolic processes affected by NatB depletion in plants.

RESULTS

AtNAA20 and AtNAA25 Form a Stable Heterodimeric Complex That Acetylates NatB-like Substrates In Vitro

Whereas homologs of the two NatB subunits NAA20 and NAA25 have been identified in the Arabidopsis genome (Bienvenut et al., 2012; Ferrández-Ayela et al., 2013), complex formation and biochemical properties of the candidate plant NatB subunits have not been addressed. To determine the stoichiometry of the AtNatB complex, AtNAA2564–1065 and AtNAA201–150His6 were coexpressed in insect cells and purified to homogeneity (Supplemental Fig. S1); AtNAA201–150His6 is highly unstable when expressed without its interaction partner AtNAA25. Size exclusion chromatography coupled to multiangle light scattering (MALS) analysis of the purified proteins revealed that in solution, NAA20 and NAA25 form a stable heterodimeric complex (measured molecular weight [Mw] = 132.1 ± 0.9 kD; theoretical Mw = 132.4 kD; Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

AtNatB acetylates MDEL peptides in vitro. A, Size-exclusion chromatography coupled to MALS analyses of AtNatB. The UV-signal (blue) of the corresponding size-exclusion chromatography chromatogram is shown together with the light scattering signal (gray) and the mass distribution (red bar). The experimentally determined molecular weight (MW) is 132.1 kD and fits well to the theoretical calculated molecular weight of 132.5 kD for both subunits. B, Substrate specificity of AtNatB tested with five different peptides. The peptides SESS, EEEI, MDEL, MLGTE, and MVNALE were previously identified as NatA, Naa10/Naa80, NatB, and NatC/E/F substrates. The control reaction was performed in the absence of peptides. C, Michaelis-Menten plot of the acetylation of MDEL catalyzed by AtNatB. B and C, The reactions were performed in triplicate and error bars represent sd. D, Enzymatic parameters of AtNatB compared to its Candida albicans homolog (CaNatB; Hong et al., 2017).

Although AtNAA20 had been recognized as an Nat (Xu et al., 2015), the substrate specificity of free NAA20 and the plant NatB complex remained elusive. To address this aspect, we applied both in vitro and in vivo acetylation assays. For the in vitro assay, five peptides representing canonical substrates of the major eukaryotic Nats were tested with the purified NatB complex. The known in vitro substrates of NatA (SESS; Ree et al., 2015; Weyer et al., 2017), Naa10/Naa80 (EEEI; Casey et al., 2015; Drazic et al., 2018), and NatC/E/F (MVNALE and MLGTE; Van Damme et al., 2011) were not acetylated. AtNatB was, however, able to acetylate the canonical substrate of human NatB (MDEL; Fig. 1B; Starheim et al., 2008). Therefore, the MDEL peptide was used to determine the enzymatic parameters of the plant NatB complex. The acetyltransferase shows a Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) of 38.4 ± 9.1 µm for its substrate acetyl-Coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) and a turnover rate (kcat) of 27.3 ± 1.6 min−1. This is in good agreement with the kcat/Km value observed for Candida albicans NatB (Fig. 1, C and D; Hong et al., 2017). Noteworthy, the Km of NatA (Liszczak and Marmorstein, 2013; Weyer et al., 2017), NatB (Hong et al., 2017; this study), and Naa50 (Liszczak and Marmorstein, 2013) for acetyl-CoA are all in the range of 24 to 59 µm. In comparison with other enzymes using acetyl-CoA in the cytosol of plant cells (e.g. Ser acetyltransferase, Km = 0.28 mm; Noji et al., 1998), the Km measured for AtNatB is low, indicating sufficient affinity for acetyl-CoA to trigger efficient catalysis by AtNatB in planta.

Down-regulation of NatB Activity Leads to Retarded Growth

In order to evaluate the impact of NatB depletion on plant development, we analyzed the T-DNA insertion lines naa20-1 (SALK_027687) and naa25-1 (GK-819A05) affected in the catalytic subunit (NAA20) or the auxiliary subunit (NAA25) of AtNatB. Quantification of the rosette radius over time revealed a slow growth of both mutants in comparison to the wild type (Fig. 2, A and B). After 7 weeks, NatB mutants reached approximately 75% of the wild-type size and 50% of its total rosette fresh weight (Fig. 2B; Supplemental Figs. S2 and S3). A similar growth retardation was observed in the NatB T-DNA insertion line naa20-2 (SAIL_323_B05), which had previously been characterized by Ferrández-Ayela et al. (2013; Supplemental Fig. S2E). Since Ferrández-Ayela et al. (2013) had reported defects in embryo development of naa20-2, we quantified viable pollen and seeds per silique in the naa20-1 and naa25-1 mutants. No significant differences in comparison to wild-type plants were detected when plants were grown under short-day conditions and optimal nutrient supply (Supplemental Fig. S4). This discrepancy might be explained by the different growth conditions used in both studies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Depletion of NatB results in growth retardation. A, Representative growth phenotypes of wild-type, naa20-1, and naa25-1 plants grown for 6 weeks under short-day conditions. Images were digitally extracted for comparison. B, Growth curve based on the rosette radius 20 to 79 d after stratification. C and D, Quantification of relative NAA20 (C) and NAA25 (D) transcript levels via RT-qPCR analysis of expression in the leaves of 6-week-old plants. E, Quantification of the NAA25 protein amount detected via a specific antiserum in soluble leaf protein extracts of 6-week-old plants grown under short-day conditions (F) as specified in the “Materials and Methods.” F, Immunological detection of AtNAA25 for quantification shown in E (n = 4). The blot shows four biological replicates for each genotype grown under identical conditions. Data given as means ± se. Different letters indicate individual groups identified by pairwise multiple comparisons with a Holm-Sidak, one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05, n ≥ 3).

We quantified the impact of the T-DNA insertion in the NAA20 and NAA25 genes on the expression of NatB subunits by analyzing the abundance of NAA20 and NAA25 transcripts via reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In both naa20-1 and naa25-1 lines, remaining NAA20 or NAA25 transcripts could be detected (Fig. 2, C and D). In addition, the translation of the NAA25 transcript was verified with a specific antiserum, confirming that naa25 mutants retain 30% of the wild-type NAA25 protein level (Fig. 2, E and F). These findings demonstrate that naa20-1 and naa25-1 are not loss-of-function NatB mutants but were significantly depleted in NatB abundance.

The Human NAA20 Homolog Can Functionally Complement the Arabidopsis naa20 Mutant

To verify whether the T-DNA insertion in the NAA20 gene was causative for the naa20-1 phenotype, the mutant was complemented with a construct expressing the endogenous Arabidopsis NAA20 protein (AtNAA20) under the control of the constitutive Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. The successful transformation was confirmed by PCR-based genotyping (Supplemental Fig. S5A). The resulting complemented naa20-1 mutants had a wild-type-like habitus and a relative rosette dry weight indistinguishable from the wild-type control (Fig. 3). When expressed via the same construct, the human NAA20 ortholog (HsNAA20) was able to rescue the Arabidopsis naa20-1 phenotype as well (Fig. 3; Supplemental Fig. S5B). Remarkably, expression of the yeast NAA20 protein (ScNAA20) using the same promoter, ribosome binding site, and terminator failed to complement naa20-1, although the ScNAA20 transcript was produced as shown by semiquantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 3, B and C; Supplemental Figs. S5, C and D, and S6). This observation is in agreement with the complementation of yeast natB loss-of-function mutants by simultaneous expression of both human NatB subunits, but not of its single subunits in the respective naa20 or naa25 single knockouts (Van Damme et al., 2012). Our results suggest that endogenous AtNAA25 assembles with AtNAA20 or HsNAA20 to a functional NatB complex, whereas interaction with ScNAA20 either failed or produced a catalytically inactive complex in planta. Furthermore, one cannot exclude that, unlike the HsNAA20, the ScNAA20 might display a different specificity with respect to some plant substrates. The relevance of species-specific differences for complementation of plant loss-of-function mutants has already been evidenced in the case of another N-terminal modifying enzyme, N-Myristoyltransferase (Pierre et al., 2007).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The Arabidopsis naa20-1 mutant can be complemented with the HsNAA20 ortholog. Representative growth phenotypes of plants grown for 8 weeks under short-day conditions. naa20-1 mutant plants were transformed either with (A) the endogenous Arabidopsis NAA20 (naa20-1:AtNAA20) or the respective homologs from humans (naa20-1:HsNAA20) or (B) yeast (naa20-1:ScNAA20). Images of plants shown in A and B were digitally extracted for comparison. C, Relative rosette dry weight of the indicated plants after 8 weeks of growth. For each transformation, three representative independent lines are shown. Data given as means ± se. Different letters indicate individual groups identified by pairwise multiple comparisons with a Holm-Sidak; one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05, n ≥ 3).

Bioinformatics Screen for Potential NatB Substrates

The functional conservation between the human and the Arabidopsis NAA20 protein suggests that the substrate specificity of the NatB complex might also be evolutionarily conserved. Thus, we screened the Arabidopsis proteome for potential NatB targets based on the database of known classical NatB substrate specificity (ME, MD, MN, and MQ). This search revealed 11,399 nuclear-encoded Arabidopsis protein variants starting with a canonical plant NatB substrate N terminus (23.6% of the total proteome; Supplemental Table S1). For 4,927 potential NatB substrates, the subcellular prediction was inconclusive according to TAIR10-Subcellular Predictions (Kaundal et al., 2010). Out of the remaining 6,472 proteins with well-predicted subcellular localizations, 1,010 proteins are supposed to be translated at the rough endoplasmic reticulum due to their extracellular localization (472) or localization in the Golgi body (60) or the cell membrane (478; Reid and Nicchitta, 2015). 5,462 protein variants are predominantly translated by cytoplasmic ribosomes and stay in the cytoplasm (969; 17.7%) or are translocated to the nucleus (3,372; 61.7%), the mitochondria (589; 10.7%), or the plastids (532; 9.7%). At least these 5,462 proteins translated by cytoplasmic ribosomes are prime candidates for proteome imprinting by NatB, since eukaryotic NatB is associated with cytoplasmic polyribosomes (Polevoda et al., 2008).

The Arabidopsis NatB Complex Targets the iMet of Protein N Termini

To verify the in vivo substrate specificity of AtNatB, we examined the N terminomes of cytosolic soluble proteins from the leaves of wild-type and NatB-depleted plants (naa20-1 and naa25-1) by the “stable isotope labelling protein N-terminal acetylation quantification (SILProNAQ) method (Bienvenut et al., 2017a). Experimental data were then processed with the EnCOUNTer tool (Bienvenut et al., 2017b) to provide an accurate measurement of the N-terminal acetylation pattern and frequency in wild-type and NatB-depleted plants. Analysis of these three genotypes together identified 1,736 N termini corresponding to 738 nonredundant proteoforms (Supplemental Table S2). The analysis of these unique proteoforms revealed that 514 (70%) underwent removal of iMet following the N-terminal Met excision rule (Frottin et al., 2006), whereas 224 proteoforms (30%) still displayed their iMet. 94% of the iMet starting N termini had an amino acid with a large lateral chain at position two (Supplemental Table S2).

Among all identified proteoforms, we were able to quantify according to criteria defined in Bienvenut et al., (2017b), 436 unique N termini (271 in the wild-type, 360 in naa20-1, and 339 in naa25-1 mutant backgrounds). Among the quantified N termini in these three genotypes, 333 underwent removal of iMet (76%) and 103 (24%) retained their iMet. In the wild-type, 87% (55/67) of the quantified N termini that retained the iMet were fully acetylated (acetylation yield > 95%), whereas 13% (12/67) were partially or not acetylated (Fig. 4A; Table 1). The fully acetylated proteins are predominantly classical NatB substrates (N termini featuring iMet followed by Glu > Asp > >Asn, (48/55). Only two NatB-type N termini were found in the groups of partly or nonacetylated proteins (2/12). The groups of weakly or nonacetylated proteins consisted mostly of iMet-Lys N termini (7/12), together with three putative NatC-type N termini (iMet-Ile and iMet-Leu, 3/12).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The Arabidopsis NatB complex acetylates N termini which retain their iMet. A to C, The acetylation level of protein N termini was studied in leaves of 6-week-old plants grown under short-day conditions on soil. The mass spectrometry analysis depicts the acetylation levels of all detected N termini (A) as well as N termini with (B) or without (C) N-terminal Met excision (NME). D, Based on the identified substrates, the NatB target consensus sequence was determined using weblogo.berkeley.edu. The size of the letter code corresponds to the relative amino acid frequency at positions one to 10. E, Quantification of the relative global amount of free N termini in soluble protein extracts isolated from leaves of 6-week-old plants. Data given as means ± se. Different letters indicate individual groups identified by pairwise multiple comparisons with a Holm-Sidak; one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05, n ≥ 3). F, Section of two dimensional-PAGE gels comparing soluble protein extracts of 9-week-old wild-type and naa20-1 plants. Arrows mark proteins with a basic shift in the naa20-1 mutant, indicating a loss of NTA. Proteins were identified by mass spectrometry. 1/1* salt-stress-related protein (AT1G13930, MD), 2/2* nucleoside diphosphate kinase1 (AT4G09320, ME), 3/3* membrane-associated progesterone binding protein (AT2G24940, ME).

Table 1. List of all protein N termini without Met excision identified and quantified in wild type.

Full acetylation is defined as an N-terminal acetylation rate higher than 90%, whereas no acetylation refers to an acetylation rate lower than 10%. Partially acetylated proteins range between these values.

Entry Description N Terminus % NTA Wild Type
AT5G10780.1 ER membrane protein complex subunit-like protein MDKGKAVMGT 100
AT1G06210.1 ENTH/VHS/GAT family protein MDKLKIAEWG 100
AT1G18070.1 Translation elongation factor EF1A/initiation factor IF2g family protein MDLEAEIRAL 100
AT3G12800.1 Short-chain dehydrogenase-reductase B MDSPFKPDVV 100
AT2G13360.1 Ala:glyoxylate aminotransferase MDYMYGPGRH 100
AT2G23120.1 Late embryogenesis abundant protein, group 6 MEAGKTPPTT 100
AT2G21620.1 Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like superfamily protein MEALPEDEEY 100
AT4G13780.1 Met-tRNA ligase, putative methionyl-tRNA synthetase, MetRS MEDDGKSSPK 100
AT4G03560.1 Two-pore channel 1 MEDPLIGRDS 100
AT2G19080.1 Metaxin-like protein MEGDQETNVY 100
AT4G24510.1 HXXXD-type acyl-transferase family protein MEGSPVTSVR 100
AT4G15630.1 Uncharacterized protein family (UPF0497) MEHESKNKVD 100
AT4G10060.1 Beta-glucosidase, GBA2 type family protein MEKNGHTESE 100
AT3G45780.1 Phototropin 1 MEPTEKPSTK 100
AT5G05170.1 Cellulose synthase family protein MESEGETAGK 100
AT4G20780.1 Calmodulin like 42 MESNNNEKKK 100
AT5G27670.1 Histone H2A 7 MESSQATTKP 100
AT5G04430.1 Binding to TOMV RNA 1L (long form) MESTESYAAG 100
AT2G42810.1 Protein phosphatase 5.2 METKNENSDV 100
AT3G04600.1 Nucleotidylyl transferase superfamily protein MEVDKKDERE 100
AT3G16250.1 NDH-dependent cyclic electron flow 1 MGSVQLSGSG 100
AT3G05870.1 Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome 11 MKVKILRILL 100
AT3G51490.1 Tonoplast monosaccharide transporter3 MRSVVLVALA 100
AT5G44316.1 ABC transporter ABCI.9 MASLFAIGFS 99.9
AT4G36250.1 Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3F1 MEAMKETVEE 99.9
AT3G27890.1 NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase MEAVTAIKPL 99.9
AT1G70810.1 Calcium-dependent lipid-binding (CaLB domain) family protein MEELVGLLRI 99.9
AT4G09320.1 Nucleoside diphosphate kinase MEQTFIMIKP 99.9
AT5G59870.1 Histone H2A 6 MESTGKVKKA 99.9
AT3G27080.1 Translocase of outer membrane 20 kD subunit 3 MDTETEFDRI 99.8
AT4G34490.1 Adenylyl cyclase-associated protein MEEDLIKRLE 99.8
AT4G23710.1 Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit G2 MESAGIQQLL 99.8
AT5G03660.1 Transcriptional activator (DUF662) MQPTETSQPA 99.8
AT5G03430.1 Phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate (PAPS) reductase family protein MEIDKAIGES 99.7
AT5G27640.1 Translation initiation factor 3B1 MEVVDIDARA 99.7
AT4G23400.1 Plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1;5 MEGKEEDVNV 99.6
AT5G54310.1 ARF-GAP domain MNEKANVSKE 99.6
AT2G43940.1 S-adenosyl-l-Met-dependent methyltransferases superfamily protein MENAGKATSL 99.5
AT1G13930.1 Oleosin-B3-like protein MNFISDQVKK 99.5
AT5G54430.1 Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like superfamily protein MNPADSDHPQ 99.5
AT4G33090.1 Aminopeptidase M1 MDQFKGEPRL 99.4
AT3G48990.1 AMP-dependent synthetase and ligase family protein MDSDTLSGLL 99.4
AT4G23730.1 Gal mutarotase-like superfamily protein MEPSSGTGPE 99.4
AT4G11150.1 Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit E1 MNDGDVSRQI 99.4
AT3G42790.1 Alfin-like 3 MEGGAALYNP 99.3
AT2G34160.1 Alba DNA/RNA-binding protein MEEITDGVNN 99.2
AT1G02090.1 COP9 signalosome complex subunit 7 MDIEQKQAEI 99
AT1G62380.1 ACC oxidase 2 MEKNMKFPVV 98.7
AT4G24800.1 MA3 domain-containing protein1 MEGFLTDQQR 98.5
AT1G04350.1 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein METKEFDSYS 98.5
AT5G19140.1 Aluminum induced protein with YGL and LRDR motifs MLGIFSGAIV 98.5
AT3G53890.1 Ribosomal protein S21e MENDAGQVTE 98.2
AT5G43830.1 Aluminum induced protein with YGL and LRDR motifs MLAVFEKTVA 96.7
AT1G29250.1 Alba DNA/RNA-binding protein MEEITEGVNN 96.3
AT5G16100.1 Uncharacterized protein MAGDDPKSSA 95.9
AT4G05530.1 Indole-3-butyric acid response 1 MEKKLPRRLE 82.2
AT1G05010.1 Ethylene-forming enzyme MESFPIINLE 78.9
AT5G25540.1 TC-interacting domain 6 MKSGSSTLNP 75.1
AT1G20696.1 High mobility group B3 MKGAKSKAET 15.9
AT1G20693.1 High mobility group B2 MKGAKSKTET 12
AT2G17560.1 High mobility group B4 MKGGESKAEA 6.6
AT3G59970.1 Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase MTHFR1 MKVVDKIKSV 2.9
AT4G21580.1 Oxidoreductase, zinc-binding dehydrogenase family protein MKAIVISEPG 2.6
AT5G27470.1 Seryl-tRNA synthetase / Ser-tRNA ligase MLDINLFREE 2.3
AT3G07230.1 Wound-responsive protein-like protein MIYDVNSGLF 1.1
AT5G52650.1 RNA binding Plectin/S10 domain-containing protein MIISEANRKE 0.6
AT3G55360.1 3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase family protein MKVTVVSRSG 0.6

The SILProNAQ approach revealed a 25% decrease in the overall N-acetylation level in NatB-depleted plants (naa20-1 and naa25-1) when compared to wild type (Fig. 4A). The acetylation frequency of N termini devoid of the iMet was unaffected in NatB-depleted mutants (Fig. 4B), which is in agreement with the acceptance of these N termini as substrates by NatA (Linster et al., 2015). Remarkably, all N termini with decreased acetylation retained their iMet (Fig. 4C). We identified 32 proteins that were fully acetylated in the wild type and displayed significantly less NTA in NatB-depleted mutants (Table 2). Those proteins predominantly displayed the acidic amino acids Asp and Glu and to a minor extent Asn at position two (Fig. 4E; Table 1). This set of in planta-detected NatB substrates independently confirms the substrate specificity determined with the in vitro reconstituted plant NatB and are thus defined as bona fide substrates in the subset of the proteome analyzed here (Fig. 1). Furthermore, three partly acetylated proteins in the wild-type showed lowered acetylation in NatB-depleted plants. The N terminus of the indole-3-butyric acid response 1 protein (starting with iMet-Asp, AT4G05530.1) was 80% acetylated in the wild type but found to be not acetylated in NatB-depleted plants (NTA level, < 1%). The two remaining proteins (HMGB2 and HMGB3) had Lys at position two, and their N termini were less than 16% acetylated in the wild type. In the NatB-depleted mutants, the NTA levels of both proteins were decreased to 8% to 13%.

Table 2. List of proteins found to be less acetylated in NatB-depleted plants.

Detected iMet retaining N termini with lowered NTA in NatB mutants (naa20-1, naa25-1) compared to wild type.

No. Entry Description N Terminus % NTA Wild Type % NTA naa20-1 % NTA naa25-1
1 AT2G13360.1 Ala:glyoxylate aminotransferase MDYMYGPG 100 29.9 29.4
2 AT2G42810.1 Protein phosphatase 5.2 METKNENS 100 59.5 61.6
3 AT3G04600.1 Nucleotidylyl transferase superfamily protein MEVDKKDE 100 24 14.8
4 AT3G12800.1 Short-chain dehydrogenase-reductase B MDSPFKPD 100 35.6 22.8
5 AT3G45780.1 Phototropin1 MEPTEKPS 100 77.5 75.6
6 AT4G13780.1 Methionyl-tRNA synthetase MEDDGKSS 100 n/a 8.3
7 AT4G20780.1 Calmodulin-like 42 MESNNNEK 100 90.1 83.8
8 AT4G24510.1 HXXXD-type acyl-transferase family protein MEGSPVTS 100 32.5 n/a
9 AT5G04430.1 Binds to ToMV genomic RNA and prevents viral multiplication MESTESYA 100 n/a 64.7
10 AT5G05170.1 Cellulose synthase isomer MESEGETA 100 47.7 n/a
11 AT5G27670.1 Translation initiation factor 3B1 MESSQATT 100 26.5 23.2
12 AT3G27890.1 NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase MEAVTAIK 99.9 57.8 62.5
13 AT4G09320.1 Nucleoside diphosphate kinase type1 MEQTFIMI 99.9 3.9 4.1
14 AT4G36250.1 Putative aldehyde dehydrogenase MEAMKETV 99.9 n/a 70.6
15 AT4G23710.1 Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit G2 MESAGIQQ 99.8 39.8 39.4
16 AT4G34490.1 Cyclase associated protein1 MEEDLIKR 99.8 6.3 3.9
17 AT5G59870.1 Histone H2A 6 MESTGKVK 99.8 n/a 15.6
18 AT5G03430.1 Phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate (PAPS) reductase family protein MEIDKAIG 99.7 2.1 3.2
19 AT5G27640.1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor3 subunit B MEVVDIDA 99.7 4.2 2.5
20 AT4G23400.1 Plasma membrane intrinsic protein1;5 MEGKEEDV 99.6 25.1 22.2
21 AT5G54310.1 ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein AGD5 MNEKANVS 99.6 1.8 n/a
22 AT5G54430.1 Contains a universal stress protein domain MNPADSDH 99.5 42.5 41
23 AT3G48990.1 AMP-dependent synthetase and ligase family protein MDSDTLSG 99.4 13.9 7.9
24 AT4G11150.1 Vacuolar H+-ATPase subunit E isoform1 MNDGDVSR 99.4 2.2 n/a
25 AT4G23730.1 Glc-6-phosphate 1-epimerase MEPSSGTG 99.4 62.4 61.8
26 AT4G33090.1 Aminopeptidase M1 MDQFKGEP 99.4 15.4 20.5
27 AT3G42790.1 Alfin1-like family of nuclear-localized PHD (plant homeodomain) domain containing proteins. MEGGAALY 99.3 37 n/a
28 AT2G34160.1 Uncharacterized protein MEEITDGV 99.2 83.3 78.3
29 AT5G10780.1 ER membrane protein complex subunit-like protein MDKGKAVM 99.1 88.2 85.6
30 AT1G62380.1 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic oxidase (ACC oxidase) MEKNMKFP 98.7 23.6 n/a
31 AT3G53890.1 40S ribosomal protein S21-1 MENDAGQV 98.2 5.2 12.4
32 AT1G29250.1 Alba DNA/RNA-binding protein MEEITEGV 96.3 43.6 n/a
33 AT4G05530.1 Indole-3-butyric acid response1 MEKKLPRR 82.2 1.9 1.6
34 AT1G20696.1 High mobility group B3 (HMGB3) MKGAKSKA 15.9 12.3 13.1
35 AT1G20693.1 High mobility group B2 (HMGB2) MKGAKSKT 12 7.9 8.9

In addition to the 35 proteins that were less acetylated in NatB-depleted plants, we observed eight in the wild type fully acetylated proteoforms that could not be quantified in NatB-depleted plants but were experimentally characterized without NTA modification (Supplemental Table S2). This set of potential NatB proteins included the salt-stress-related protein AT1G13930 (see below). In accordance with the AtNatB substrate specificity determined here, these proteins also possess Glu > Asp > Asn as second residues.

After characterization of the in vivo substrate specificity of plant NatB, we rechecked the number of NatB substrate N termini in the wild-type protein fraction and detected 499 N-terminal peptides, of which 149 started with an iMet. Out of the iMet-retaining peptides, 108 displayed an N terminus starting with iMetAsp, iMetGlu, or iMetAsn (Supplemental Table S3), which can be accepted by the plant NatB according to the in vitro and in vivo analysis of the AtNatB substrate specificity performed here (Figs. 1 and 4). This analysis defines 22% of the detected N termini in the leaves of the wild type as substrates of NatB. Due to the remaining NatB activity (approximately 30% of wild-type level) in the naa20-1 or naa25-1 mutants, not all of these substrates were less acetylated in the mutants. Notably, the majority of potential NatB substrates were found to be fully acetylated in the wild-type leaf under nonstressed conditions. In agreement with the finding that approximately 22% of the detected N termini from soluble proteins match the substrate specificity of NatB, a significant increase of free N termini in NatB-depleted mutants was demonstrated by fluorescent labeling of free protein N termini with NBT-Cl (Fig. 4D).

In parallel to the SILProNAQ analysis, a 2D gel approach was applied to identify further NatB substrates. Total protein extracts from wild-type or naa20-1 plants were separated by 2D gel electrophoresis according to their size and charge. If a basic shift was observed for a protein species, this was attributed to the increased positive charge of the protein due to loss of NTA. The 2D gel analysis yielded three reproducible shifts (Fig. 4F; Supplemental Fig. S7). In the case of the salt-stress-related protein AT1G13930, we could verify that the N-terminal peptide (iMet-Asn) of the acidic proteoform was acetylated in both genotypes, whereas the basic proteoform was unacetylated. These results demonstrate lowered NTA of AT1G13930 in naa20-1 when compared to wild type and independently confirm the identification of AT1G13930 as a NatB substrate by the SILProNAQ approach. The SILProNAQ approach also supports the lowered NTA of nucleoside diphosphate kinase1 (AT4G09320; Table 2), which was identified in spot 2 and spot 2* within the 2D gel approach (Fig. 4F).

NatB Depletion Results in Sensitivity to High-Salt and Osmotic Stress

Based on the above results and the identification of the salt sensitivity modulator AT1G13930 as a NatB substrate (Fig. 4F), we analyzed the performance of NatB-depleted mutants under high-salt and osmotic stress. To this end, seeds were germinated on 1× Murashige & Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with either 100 mm NaCl, 3% (w/v) mannitol, or no osmoticum. Both NatB-depleted mutants showed a significant reduction in germination efficiency when grown on NaCl or mannitol, demonstrating that NatB is essential for efficient germination under hyperosmotic or high-salt conditions (Fig. 5, A to C). To prove that this diminished germination efficiency was exclusive to NatB mutants rather than a pleiotropic side effect of impaired NTA at the ribosome, the NatA-depleted lines amiNAA10 and amiNAA15 were subjected to the same stress. Depletion of NatA activity did not influence the germination rate under hyperosmotic or high-salt conditions (Fig. 5, B to D), indicating a specific function of NatB-mediated proteome imprinting during these stresses. To assess the effect of osmotic stress on adult plants, wild-type and naa20-1 mutants were grown on one-half strength MS medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) Suc for 2 weeks under short-day conditions. Subsequently, the plants were transferred to the same medium (control) or medium supplemented with 150 mm NaCl. After 2 weeks, the growth of the primary root was evaluated. Although both plants experienced salt stress as indicated by the increased transcription of the salt stress marker gene HB-7, only naa20-1 mutants displayed a significantly impaired primary root growth on high-salt medium (Supplemental Fig. S8).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

NatB mutants are sensitive to salt and osmotic stress. Seeds of mutants depleted in subunits of NatB or NatA were surface sterilized, stratified for 2 d, and germinated on 1× MS medium (Control) or medium supplemented with 100 mm NaCl or 3% (w/v) mannitol (Mannitol), respectively. Germination of plants was evaluated after seven days of growth under short-day conditions. A and B, Representative sections of germinated and nongerminated seeds. Scale bars, 5 mm. C and D, Quantification of corresponding germination rates. Data given as means ± se. Different letters indicate individual groups identified by pairwise multiple comparisons with a Holm-Sidak; one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05, n = 3, 1n ≥ 30 seeds).

Global Transcriptome Analysis of NatB-Depleted Mutants

Based on the vast number of predicted NatB substrates, NatB depletion was expected to affect a variety of cellular processes. A global analysis of the leaf transcriptome revealed differential regulation (>1.5-fold up- or down-regulated) of 494 transcripts (∼2% of all tested transcripts) when comparing 6-week-old soil-grown naa20-1 mutants to wild-type plants (Gene Expression Omnibus record: GSE132978). In this context, 322 transcripts were down-regulated and 172 transcripts upregulated (Supplemental Table S4). To identify putatively NatB-affected biological processes, we performed a gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for differentially regulated genes in naa20-1 using the DAVID Bioinformatic Resources tool v. 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/; Table 3; Supplemental Table S5). Among the upregulated transcripts, genes involved in transition metal transport, namely zinc ion transport, and lipid localization were significantly (3-fold enrichment, P < 0.05) enriched. Among the down-regulated transcripts, however, genes mediating plant stress responses were considerably overrepresented. The down-regulated responses to environmental perturbations included not only the reaction to light intensity or toxins but also distinct steps within the immune response, e.g. responses to bacteria, fungi, viruses, wounding, and reactive oxygen species. Taken together, this pattern of transcriptional regulation in NatB-depleted mutants suggest an even broader function of NatB in the plant immune response than previously shown by Xu et al. (2015).

Table 3. GO term enrichment analysis for differentially regulated genes in NatB-depleted plants.

Total RNA was extracted from 17-day-old naa20-1 and wild-type seedlings grown under short-day conditions (n = 4). The transcripts were analyzed via an Affimetrix GeneChip. Differentially regulated transcripts (> 1.5-fold up- or down-regulated compared to wild type; P < 0.05) were subjected to a GO enrichment analysis performed with the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources tool v.6.8 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov). Among the 494 differentially regulated transcripts, genes involved in the depicted molecular functions were significantly (>3-fold, P < 0.05) enriched. Counts represent the number of regulated transcripts. For clarity, redundant GO terms are omitted in this table; all GO terms are available in Supplemental Table S5.

GO Term Annotation Count Trend Fold Enriched P Value
Defense response to bacterium GO:0009816 6 Down 17.1 0.00
Chitin metabolic/catabolic process GO:0006030 4 Down 11.9 0.00
Toxin metabolic/catabolic process GO:0009404 5 Down 8.1 0.00
Regulation of defense response GO:0031347 6 Down 7.3 0.00
Indole derivative metabolic process GO:0042434 4 Down 7.1 0.02
Polysaccharide catabolic process GO:0000272 6 Down 6.0 0.00
Response to bacterium GO:0009617 19 Down 5.8 0.00
Response to light intensity GO:0009642 5 Down 5.1 0.02
Immune response GO:0006955 20 Down 5.1 0.00
Cell death GO:0008219 17 Down 5.0 0.00
Response to chitin GO:0010200 8 Down 4.7 0.00
Response to oxidative stress GO:0006979 15 Down 3.9 0.00
Response to salicylic acid stimulus GO:0009751 7 Down 3.5 0.02
Defense response GO:0006952 45 Down 3.2 0.00
Zinc ion transport GO:0006829 4 Up 27.9 0.00
Transition metal ion transport GO:0000041 5 Up 10.0 0.00
Lipid localization GO:0010876 7 Up 6.2 0.00
Lipid transport GO:0006869 5 Up 5.0 0.02

DISCUSSION

The Arabidopsis NatB complex is involved in a variety of developmental processes, including leaf shape formation and transition from vegetative to generative growth. The developmental defects observed in NatB mutants had previously been attributed to a total loss of NatB activity (Ferrández-Ayela et al., 2013). Here, we demonstrate that the available NatB T-DNA insertion lines retain a diminished NatB expression and hence do not constitute full knockouts. This finding demonstrates the importance of functional NatB-mediated imprinting of the proteome with acetylation marks and also raises the question toward the severity of total NatB loss of function. Since full loss of function NatB mutants by T-DNA insertion are currently unavailable, this question should be addressed by CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene disruption in future studies. Loss of NatA causes abortion of the plant embryo at the globular stage (Linster et al., 2015). It is tempting to speculate that loss of NatB might as well be lethal in plants. Remarkably, depletion of NatB activity in human cells impairs cellular proliferation and affects tumorigenesis (Ametzazurra et al., 2008, 2009; Starheim et al., 2008). In yeast, NatB is dispensable like the loss of any other Nat complex. The yeast natB mutants showed the most severe phenotypes when compared to natA, natC, natD, or natE mutants. These phenotypes included cytoskeleton defects, cell cycle arrest, and severe growth retardation (Polevoda et al., 2003; Singer and Shaw, 2003).

NatB Substrate Specificity Is Conserved in Yeast, Humans, and Plants

Except for the NatA complex, the substrate specificity of plant Nats was barely investigated in previous works (Pesaresi et al., 2003; Linster et al., 2015). This lack of knowledge prompted us to determine the NatB substrate specificity by N-terminal acetylome profiling of NatB-depleted mutants and by analyzing the enzymatic activity of reconstituted AtNatB in vitro. Biochemical characterization of the heterodimeric plant NatB and the proteomic approach revealed a clear preference of NatB toward N termini retaining their iMet followed by Glu or Asp. To a minor extent, iMet followed by Asn were also accepted as substrate in the subset of the leaf proteome analyzed here. The recognition of those substrates recapitulates the established substrate specificity of yeast and human NatB (Helbig et al., 2010; Van Damme et al., 2012) and suggests significant conservation of NatB substrate specificity in fungi, animals, and plants. Despite the conserved substrate specificity of eukaryotic NatB complexes, only HsNAA20 but not ScNAA20 was able to complement the retarded growth phenotype of naa20-1 plants. A similar observation was reported for NatA, whereby yeast loss-of-function NatA mutants are rescued by reconstituted human NatA complex, whereas the human catalytic or auxiliary NatA subunits alone cannot complement the respective single loss-of-function mutants, suggesting significant structural subunit differences between the species (Arnesen et al., 2009b). Similarly, significant differences in the complex assembly have been reported for AtNatC and ScNatC (Pesaresi et al., 2003).

The substrate specificity of plant NatB determined here suggests that ∼24% of the plant proteome is imprinted by NatB (bioinformatical prediction). In agreement with such a high number of NatB substrates, 21% of the proteins whose N terminus could be quantified in wild type and NatB mutants were identified as substrates of NatB. Such broad substrate recognition has also been determined for NatB of other eukaryotes (Helbig et al., 2010; Van Damme et al., 2012) and can be explained by the predominant interaction of the first two amino acids of the substrate peptide with the active site of the catalytic NatB subunit (Hong et al., 2017). Furthermore, depletion of AtNatB to 30% of wild-type level in naa20-1 and naa25-1 caused more than a 1.5-fold increase of total free N termini (Fig. 4). Since the NatB-depleted mutants retain 30% of the wild-type NatB activity, we could only identify 35 substrates to be unambiguously less acetylated in naa20-1 and naa25-1 mutants. Thus, these 35 proteins represent the apparently most sensitive substrates of AtNatB in leaves.

The proteins encoded by AT5G10780 and AT1G64520 carry the amino acid Asp as penultimate residue and are both 99% acetylated in wild-type plants. Remarkably, the knockdown of NatB in naa20 or naa25 mutants reduced the acetylation yield for AT1G64520 to 2%, whereas the protein encoded by AT5G10780 remained acetylated to 87% to 88% in the mutant. Thus, the substrate specificity and degree of acetylation by NatB predominantly depends on the first two amino acids but is also shaped by additional primary sequence information or the secondary structure of the nascent chain. In this respect, a recent study demonstrated that alpha-helices could fold cotranslationally within the ribosomal exit tunnel (Nilsson et al., 2015), which may interfere with binding into the catalytic pocket of NAA20.

Acetylation via Different Nats Regulates Specific Plant Stress Responses

Unlike NatA, which had previously been shown to mediate the drought stress response in Arabidopsis, NatB has not previously been associated with any plant abiotic stress response. The vast number of potential NatB substrates and the overall decrease of stress responses at the transcriptional level in naa20-1 mutants prompted us to analyze the performance of NatB-depleted mutants upon protein-harming stress. We selected high-salt and osmotic stress because both cause misfolding of proteins and consequently affect proteostasis (Chen et al., 2019). Indeed, plant NatB mutants were sensitive to osmotic stress, which has also been shown for yeast NatB mutants (Van Damme et al., 2012). A protective role of ScNAA20-dependent acetylation with respect to protein degradation and susceptibility to specific stresses has been suggested (Nguyen et al., 2019). Notably, the depletion of NatA activity did not lead to hypersensitivity against osmotic or high-salt stress in plants, although NatA targets approximately twice as many substrates as NatB (Linster and Wirtz, 2018). Vice versa, the knockdown of NatA results in drought-tolerant plants, whereas NatB-depleted plants were drought sensitive comparable to the wild type (Linster et al., 2015). Despite the high number of substrates acetylated by each Nat complex, our results support discrete functions of Nat complexes in response to specific stresses.

In human and yeast, proteomics and transcriptome analysis of NatB-depleted cells show that NatB substrates are mainly involved in DNA processing and cell cycle progression (Caesar and Blomberg, 2004; Caesar et al., 2006; Ametzazurra et al., 2008). The global transcriptome analysis of naa20 mutants relates NatB-mediated acetylation in plants to transition metal transport, lipid localization, and stress responses. One particular stress response of interest is defense against pathogens. Among the transcripts down-regulated in naa20 mutants, transcripts implicated in the defense against pathogens are significantly enriched, which might translate into a weaker response to biotic stresses in NatB-depleted plants. Indeed, a connection between Nat-mediated protein stability and pathogen resistance was recently shown by Xu et al. (2015). Xu and colleagues found that a depletion of NatB subunits in Arabidopsis caused decreased immunity against the virulent oomycete Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis Noco2 mediated by destabilization of the plant immune receptor SNC1 (Suppressor of NPR1, Constitutive 1). Interestingly, the stability of SNC1 is antagonistically regulated by NatB and NatA. Whereas acetylation of the receptor via NatA serves as a degradation signal, acetylation via NatB stabilizes SNC1 (Xu et al., 2015).

CONCLUSION

NTA by the NatB complex has been well characterized in yeast and humans; however, the role of NatB in phototrophic organisms was less clear. The combination of biochemical and reverse genetic approaches presented here elucidate the substrate specificity and stoichiometry of subunits in the Arabidopsis NatB complex and reveal the global transcriptional consequences of NatB down-regulation. The high-salt and osmotic stress experiments performed here uncover a specific role of the AtNatB complex under physiologically relevant abiotic stresses. These findings expand the view on NatB function beyond its influence on plant development. In combination with our previous findings on the role of NatA in the plant drought stress response, these results encourage speculation that dynamic regulation of N-terminal protein acetylation modulates plant stress responses and that distinct Nat complexes have specific roles in this modulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

All work was performed with Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0). The utilized T-DNA insertion lines naa20-1 (SALK_027687, successfully selected on kanamycin), naa20-2 (SAIL_323_B05, successfully selected on glufosinate), and naa25-1 (GK-819A05, not selected on sulfadiazine in this study) originate from the SALK, SAIL, and GABI-KAT collections (Sessions et al., 2002; Alonso et al., 2003; Rosso et al., 2003), respectively. The NatA artificial microRNA knockdown lines amiNAA10 and amiNAA15 were created by Linster et al. (2015). All experiments except the osmotic stress treatment (described below) were conducted with plants grown on medium containing one-half soil and one-half substrate 2 (Klasmann-Deilmann) under short-day conditions (8.5-h light, 100 μE light photon flux density, 24°C/18°C day/night temperatures, and 50% humidity).

Osmotic Stress Treatment

To analyze the implications of NatB-mediated N-terminal acetylation under osmotic stress, seeds of NatB-depleted mutants were surface-sterilized with 70% (v/v) ethanol (5 min) and 6% (v/v) NaClO (2 min) followed by three washing steps with sterile water. After 2 d of stratification at 4°C, seeds were germinated under short-day conditions on 1× MS medium (4 g/L MS salts [Duchefa], 1% [w/v] Suc, 0.4 g/L MES, 0.7% [w/v] micro agar, pH 5.9). To induce osmotic stress, plates were supplemented with either 100 mm NaCl or 3% (w/v) mannitol.

To assess the effect of osmotic stress on adult plants, seeds of wild-type and naa20-1 mutants were surface sterilized and stratified as described above. The plants were grown on one-half strength MS medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) Suc for 2 weeks under short-day conditions. Subsequently, the plants were transferred to the same medium (control) or medium supplemented with 150 mm NaCl. After 2 weeks, the growth of the primary root was evaluated. The transcript levels of the salt stress marker HB-7 (AT2G4668; Liu et al., 2007) and the putative NatB substrate salt-stress-related protein (AT1G13930) were assessed via RT-qPCR (see below).

PCR

PCR for identification of T-DNA insertion lines was performed with the Taq-DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, M0267L). Genotyping of T-DNA insertion lines naa20-1, naa20-2, and naa25 was conducted with specific primer combinations for the wild-type (NAA20_LP, NAA20_RP, NAA25_LP, and NAA25_RP) and mutant allele (SALK_BP and GK_BP). For cloning, DNA was amplified with the high-fidelity DNA polymerase Phusion (New England Biolabs, M0530L). All enzymes were used according to the supplier’s instruction manual. The corresponding primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S6.

RT-qPCR

To analyze Nat transcript levels, total RNA was extracted from leaves using the RNeasy Plant Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Subsequently, total RNA was transcribed into cDNA with the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit using oligo(dT) primers (Thermo Scientific). All reactions were conducted according to the supplier’s protocol. The cDNA was analyzed by qPCR with the qPCRBIO SyGreen Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems) and TIP41 (AT4G34270; Czechowski et al., 2005) as reference gene. The primer sequences for specific amplification of genes are listed in the Supplemental Table S6. Data were analyzed via Rotor-Gene Q Series Software (v2.0.2).

Stable Transformation of Arabidopsis

To analyze the conservation between NAA20 orthologs, the Arabidopsis naa20-1 line was transformed with the endogenous NAA20 sequence as well as the human and yeast NAA20 sequences. The genes of interest were amplified via PCR using Gateway compatible primers (AtNAA20-N, AtNAA20-C, HsNAA20-N, HsNAA20-C, ScNAA20-N, and ScNAA20-C; see Supplemental Table S6). The NAA20 sequences were then cloned into the binary vector pB2GW7, where they were expressed under the control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Stable transformation was conducted according to the floral-dip method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis described by Clough and Bent (1998). Transformants were selected using 200 mg/L BASTA at the age of 2 weeks. The presence of stably transformed constructs was confirmed using primers either amplifying the BASTA (BASTA_fw and BASTA_rev) or the ScNAA20 (ScNat3_fw and ScNat3_rev) sequence. To control the expression of the ScNAA20 construct, semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed via Taq-DNA Polymerase using the housekeeping gene actin as a positive control (ScNAA20_fwd, ScNAA20_rev, Actin_fwd, and Actin_rev).

Generation of a NAA25-Specific Antibody

The DNA sequence encoding the amino acids 233 to 430 of NAA25 was PCR amplified with primers comprising restriction sites for NcoI and HindIII (NAA25_fwd and NAA25-rev; Supplemental Table S6) and cloned into pET20b (C-terminal His-fusion) using the newly introduced restriction sites. Correct cloning was verified by DNA sequencing. For protein expression, the vector was transformed into Escherichia coli Rosetta DE3 pLysS (Novagen) by electroporation. Cell cultures were grown in 300 mL selective Luria-Bertanimedium at 37°C and protein expression was induced at an optical density 600 of 0.8 with 1 mm IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside). After 5 h of incubation, the cells were harvested by centrifugation and stored at −80°C until further usage. E. coli pellets containing recombinant proteins were lysed by sonication in 5 mL resuspension buffer (250 mm NaCl, 50 mm Tris, pH 8.0, supplemented with 0.5 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The crude extract was centrifuged, and the resulting pellet was dissolved in 10 mL denaturation buffer (8 m urea, 10 mm NaH2PO4, 1 mm Tris, pH 8.0) using the Ultra-Turrax T25. The protein fraction was cleared by centrifugation (10 min at 26,400g, 4°C). The supernatant was used for further separation via SDS-PAGE. The NAA25 fragment band was cut out, and the protein was eluted in denaturation buffer using the electro elution chamber Biotrap BT 1000 (Schleicher and Schuell) according the manufacturer’s instructions. The denatured protein fraction was concentrated using the Vivaspin 2 Centrifugal Concentrator (10,000 MW Cut off, Polythersulfon) and used for the immunization of rabbits.

Protein Extraction from Arabidopsis Leaf Tissue

Total soluble protein extracts were isolated from 200 mg ground leaf material using 500 µL precooled extraction buffer (50 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mm KCl, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 10% [v/v] glycerol) supplemented with 10 mm dithiothreitol and 0.5 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Protein extracts were cleared by centrifugation (10 min at 20,200g, 4°C) and the protein concentration was quantified according to Bradford (1976).

SDS-PAGE and Immunological Detection

Protein extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE according to Laemmli (1970) and blotted to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using Mini-Protean II cells (Bio-Rad). The primary NAA25 antibody and the secondary horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit antibody (#AS10 852, Agrisera) were diluted 1:5,000 and 1:25,000 in 1× Tris-buffered saline plus Tween 20 (50 mm Tris, pH 7.6, 150 mm NaCl, 0.05% [v/v] Tween 20) supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin. Membranes were developed using the SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting signals were recorded using the ImageQuant LAS 4,000 (GE Healthcare) and subsequently quantified with the ImageQuant TL Software (GE Healthcare).

Separation of Total Arabidopsis Protein by Two-Dimensional PAGE

To identify putative NatB substrates, 200 mg leaf material of 9-week-old, soil-grown wild-type and naa20 plants was ground in liquid nitrogen. Proteins were precipitated with trichloric acid/acetone. Subsequently, 160 mg protein of protein were subjected to isolectric focusing followed by SDS-PAGE as described in Heeg et al. (2008). The separated proteins were visualized by silver staining (Blum et al., 1987). Putative substrates were identified with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy analysis as outlined in Heeg et al. (2008).

Determination of the Global Transcriptome

The peqGOLD Total RNA kit (Peqlab) was used to extract RNA from 17-d-old wild-type and naa20-1 seedlings grown on 1× MS medium under short-day conditions. A global transcriptome analysis was performed using the Affimetrix (High Wycombe) Arabidopsis Genechip (AraGene-1_0st-typ) as described in detail by Linster et al. (2015). Transcripts that were differentially regulated (>1.5-fold up- or down-regulated, P < 0.05) in naa20-1 compared to wild type were functionally annotated. Overrepresented biological processes were identified based on the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 GO analysis (Huang et al., 2009a, 2009b).

Quantification of N-Terminal Protein Acetylation

Soluble leaf proteins from 6-week-old soil-grown wild type and the NatB-depleted mutants, naa20-1, and naa25-1, were extracted for quantification of N-terminal protein acetylation. The extracted proteins were processed and enriched by an strong cation exchange chromatograpphy approach for quantification of N-terminal peptides using mass spectrometry as described in Linster et al. (2015).

Determination of Free N Termini

To determine the relative amount of free N termini in wild-type, naa20-1, and naa25-1 plants, soluble proteins were extracted from leaf material with 50 mm sodium citrate buffer, pH 7.0 supplemented with 1 mm EDTA. For removal of free amino acids, protein extracts were subsequently gel filtrated via PDMiniTrap G-25 columns (GE Healthcare). The labeling of free N termini was performed with 2.5 µm extracted protein and 0.5 mm NBD-Cl (Bernal-Perez et al., 2012) in 50 mm sodium citrate buffer, pH 7.0, supplemented with 1 mm EDTA. After 14 h of incubation at room temperature, the fluorescence intensity was quantified via a FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech; excitation, 470 ± 10; emission, 520 nm).

Construction of AtNatB Baculovirus

AtNAA2564–1065 and AtNAA201–150 coding sequences were amplified by PCR from Arabidopsis cDNA, and a C-terminal His-tag was introduced into the AtNAA20 sequence (Supplemental Table S1). The PCR products were cloned into pET24d and pET21d (Novagen), respectively. AtNAA2564–1065 and AtNAA201–150His6 coding sequences were subcloned from the pET24d or the pET21d vectors (Novogen) into a pFastBacDUAL vector (Invitrogen). A bacmid was generated by transferring the plasmid into electrocompetent DH10 MultiBac E. coli cells (Geneva Biotech). Afterward, the Escort IV Transfection reactant (Sigma) was used to transfect Spodoptera frugiperda cells, cultured in serum-free medium II (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 5% (v/v) EX-CELL TiterHigh (Sigma) and appropriate antibiotics, with the obtained bacmid DNA. Finally, the baculovirus was amplified twice before using it for protein expression.

Protein Purification

Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells were grown in serum-free medium II (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 5% (v/v) EX-CELL TiterHigh (Sigma) and appropriate antibiotics to a density of 8 ± 105 cells/mL. 250 mL of cultures were infected using the AtNAA2564–1065 AtNAA201–150His6 baculovirus. The cells were grown at 27°C and harvested after 3 d by centrifugation (15 min, 1,500g at 4°C). For purification, the harvested cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mm NaCl, 20 mm MgCl2, 20 mm KCl, 20 mm imidazole, supplemented with protease inhibitor mix and benzonase) and lysed using a microfluidizer (M-110L, Microfluidics). The lysate was cleared by ultracentrifugation (50,000g, 30 min, 4°C), and the supernatant was loaded on Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen). The AtNAA2564–1065 AtNAA201–150His6 complex was eluted using lysis buffer supplemented with 250 mm imidazole and loaded on a Superdex 200 16/60 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in gel filtration buffer (20 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mm NaCl) for size exclusion chromatography.

MALS

0.1 mg AtNAA2564–1065 AtNAA201–150His6 was injected onto a Superdex 200 10/300 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) in gel filtration buffer. The column was connected to a MALS system (Dawn Heleos II 8+ and Optilab T-rEX, Wyatt Technology). Measurements were performed in triplicates, and data were analyzed using the Astra 6 software (Wyatt Technology).

In Vitro Acetyltransferase Assays

Acetylation activity of AtNAA2564–1065 AtNAA201–50His6 was recorded using a SpectraMax M5e MultiMode Microplate reader by continuously detecting the A412. The assays were performed at 25°C with 1.0 mm MDEL peptide (PLS) mixed with acetyl-CoA (12.5–500 µm) in reaction buffer (2 mm 5,5′dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid), 70 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 70 mm NaCl, 20 mm sodium phosphate dibasic, pH 6.8, 2 mm EDTA). The enzyme (final concentration 500 nm) was added to start the reaction. To determine the substrate specificity of AtNatB, various peptides (SESS, EEEI, MDEL, MVNALE, and MLGTE [all PLS]) and a constant acetyl-CoA concentration of 100 µm were used. The concentration of the produced CoA was quantified after 30 min. Control reactions were performed in the absence of the peptides. Measurements were taken in triplicates.

Basic Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SigmaPlot 12.0. Means from different sets of data were analyzed for statistically significant differences with the Holm-Sidak one-way ANOVA test or the Student’s t test. Significant differences (P < 0.05) are indicated with different letters.

Accession Numbers

Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession numbers LR699745.2 (AtNAA20), CP002688.1 (AtNAA25), CP002688.1 (AtNAA10), and CP002684.1 (AtNAA15)

Supplemental Data

The following supplemental materials are available.

Footnotes

1

Research at Heidelberg was funded by the German Research Council (DFG) via the Collaborative Research Centre 1036 (TP 13 to R.H. and M.W. and TP 22 to I.S.), the Leibniz Programme to I.S., and the European Union and the European Research Council by the ERA-CAPS project KatNat to M.W. and C.G. Research in C.G.’s lab was supported by ANR Energiome and Sciences-Paris-Saclay. R.H. and I.S. are investigators of the Cluster of Excellence: CellNetworks.

References

  1. Aksnes H, Drazic A, Marie M, Arnesen T (2016) First things first: Vital protein marks by N-terminal acetyltransferases. Trends Biochem Sci 41: 746–760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksnes H, Hole K, Arnesen T (2015a) Molecular, cellular, and physiological significance of N-terminal acetylation. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 316: 267–305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aksnes H, Ree R, Arnesen T (2019) Co-translational, post-translational, and non-catalytic roles of N-terminal acetyltransferases. Mol Cell 73: 1097–1114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aksnes H, Van Damme P, Goris M, Starheim KK, Marie M, Støve SI, Hoel C, Kalvik TV, Hole K, Glomnes N, et al. (2015b) An organellar nα-acetyltransferase, naa60, acetylates cytosolic N termini of transmembrane proteins and maintains Golgi integrity. Cell Reports 10: 1362–1374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al. (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ametzazurra A, Gázquez C, Lasa M, Larrea E, Prieto J, Aldabe R (2009) Characterization of the human Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferase B enzymatic complex. BMC Proc 3(Suppl 6): S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ametzazurra A, Larrea E, Civeira MP, Prieto J, Aldabe R (2008) Implication of human N-α-acetyltransferase 5 in cellular proliferation and carcinogenesis. Oncogene 27: 7296–7306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arnesen T. (2011) Towards a functional understanding of protein N-terminal acetylation. PLoS Biol 9: e1001074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arnesen T, Gromyko D, Kagabo D, Betts MJ, Starheim KK, Varhaug JE, Anderson D, Lillehaug JR (2009a) A novel human NatA Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferase complex: hNaa16p-hNaa10p (hNat2-hArd1). BMC Biochem 10: 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arnesen T, Van Damme P, Polevoda B, Helsens K, Evjenth R, Colaert N, Varhaug JE, Vandekerckhove J, Lillehaug JR, Sherman F, et al. (2009b) Proteomics analyses reveal the evolutionary conservation and divergence of N-terminal acetyltransferases from yeast and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 8157–8162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernal-Perez LF, Prokai L, Ryu Y (2012) Selective N-terminal fluorescent labeling of proteins using 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan: a method to distinguish protein N-terminal acetylation. Anal Biochem 428: 13–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bienvenut WV, Giglione C, Meinnel T (2017a) SILProNAQ: A convenient approach for proteome-wide analysis of protein N-termini and N-terminal acetylation quantitation. Methods Mol Biol 1574: 17–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bienvenut WV, Scarpelli JP, Dumestier J, Meinnel T, Giglione C (2017b) EnCOUNTer: A parsing tool to uncover the mature N-terminus of organelle-targeted proteins in complex samples. BMC Bioinformatics 18: 182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bienvenut WV, Sumpton D, Martinez A, Lilla S, Espagne C, Meinnel T, Giglione C (2012) Comparative large scale characterization of plant versus mammal proteins reveals similar and idiosyncratic N-α-acetylation features. Mol Cell Proteom 11: M111.015131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ (1987) Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8: 93–99 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bradford MM. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Caesar R, Blomberg A (2004) The stress-induced Tfs1p requires NatB-mediated acetylation to inhibit carboxypeptidase Y and to regulate the protein kinase A pathway. J Biol Chem 279: 38532–38543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caesar R, Warringer J, Blomberg A (2006) Physiological importance and identification of novel targets for the N-terminal acetyltransferase NatB. Eukaryot Cell 5: 368–378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Casey JP, Støve SI, McGorrian C, Galvin J, Blenski M, Dunne A, Ennis S, Brett F, King MD, Arnesen T, et al. (2015) NAA10 mutation causing a novel intellectual disability syndrome with Long QT due to N-terminal acetyltransferase impairment. Sci Rep 5: 16022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen Z, Zhao P-X, Miao Z-Q, Qi G-F, Wang Z, Yuan Y, Ahmad N, Cao M-J, Hell R, Wirtz M, et al. (2019) SULTR3s function in chloroplast sulfate uptake and affect ABA biosynthesis and the stress response. Plant Physiol 180: 593–604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altmann T, Udvardi MK, Scheible WR (2005) Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139: 5–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dinh TV, Bienvenut WV, Linster E, Feldman-Salit A, Jung VA, Meinnel T, Hell R, Giglione C, Wirtz M (2015) Molecular identification and functional characterization of the first Nα-acetyltransferase in plastids by global acetylome profiling. Proteomics 15: 2426–2435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Drazic A, Aksnes H, Marie M, Boczkowska M, Varland S, Timmerman E, Foyn H, Glomnes N, Rebowski G, Impens F, et al. (2018) NAA80 is actin’s N-terminal acetyltransferase and regulates cytoskeleton assembly and cell motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115: 4399–4404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dupree P, Sherrier DJ (1998) The plant Golgi apparatus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1404: 259–270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Falb M, Aivaliotis M, Garcia-Rizo C, Bisle B, Tebbe A, Klein C, Konstantinidis K, Siedler F, Pfeiffer F, Oesterhelt D (2006) Archaeal N-terminal protein maturation commonly involves N-terminal acetylation: A large-scale proteomics survey. J Mol Biol 362: 915–924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ferrández-Ayela A, Micol-Ponce R, Sánchez-García AB, Alonso-Peral MM, Micol JL, Ponce MR (2013) Mutation of an Arabidopsis NatB N-alpha-terminal acetylation complex component causes pleiotropic developmental defects. PLoS One 8: e80697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Frottin F, Martinez A, Peynot P, Mitra S, Holz RC, Giglione C, Meinnel T (2006) The proteomics of N-terminal methionine cleavage. Mol Cell Proteomics 5: 2336–2349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Giglione C, Fieulaine S, Meinnel T (2015) N-terminal protein modifications: Bringing back into play the ribosome. Biochimie 114: 134–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Heeg C, Kruse C, Jost R, Gutensohn M, Ruppert T, Wirtz M, Hell R (2008) Analysis of the Arabidopsis O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase gene family demonstrates compartment-specific differences in the regulation of cysteine synthesis. Plant Cell 20: 168–185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Helbig AO, Rosati S, Pijnappel PW, van Breukelen B, Timmers MH, Mohammed S, Slijper M, Heck AJ (2010) Perturbation of the yeast N-acetyltransferase NatB induces elevation of protein phosphorylation levels. BMC Genomics 11: 685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hong H, Cai Y, Zhang S, Ding H, Wang H, Han A (2017) Molecular Basis of substrate specific acetylation by N-terminal acetyltransferase NatB. Structure 25: 641–649.e3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009a) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 1–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009b) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaundal R, Saini R, Zhao PX (2010) Combining machine learning and homology-based approaches to accurately predict subcellular localization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 154: 36–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Laemmli UK. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Linster E, Stephan I, Bienvenut WV, Maple-Grødem J, Myklebust LM, Huber M, Reichelt M, Sticht C, Møller SG, Meinnel T, et al. (2015) Downregulation of N-terminal acetylation triggers ABA-mediated drought responses in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 6: 7640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Linster E, Wirtz M (2018) N-terminal acetylation: An essential protein modification emerges as an important regulator of stress responses. J Exp Bot 69: 4555–4568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liszczak G, Marmorstein R (2013) Implications for the evolution of eukaryotic amino-terminal acetyltransferase (NAT) enzymes from the structure of an archaeal ortholog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 14652–14657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu J-X, Srivastava R, Che P, Howell SH (2007) Salt stress responses in Arabidopsis utilize a signal transduction pathway related to endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling. Plant J 51: 897–909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nguyen KT, Kim JM, Park SE, Hwang CS (2019) N-terminal methionine excision of proteins creates tertiary destabilizing N-degrons of the Arg/N-end rule pathway. J Biol Chem 294: 4464–4476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nilsson OB, Hedman R, Marino J, Wickles S, Bischoff L, Johansson M, Müller-Lucks A, Trovato F, Puglisi JD, O’Brien EP, Beckmann R, von Heijne G (2015) Cotranslational protein folding inside the ribosome exit tunnel. Cell Reports 12: 1533–1540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Noji M, Inoue K, Kimura N, Gouda A, Saito K (1998) Isoform-dependent differences in feedback regulation and subcellular localization of serine acetyltransferase involved in cysteine biosynthesis from Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 273: 32739–32745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pesaresi P, Gardner NA, Masiero S, Dietzmann A, Eichacker L, Wickner R, Salamini F, Leister D (2003) Cytoplasmic N-terminal protein acetylation is required for efficient photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15: 1817–1832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pierre M, Traverso JA, Boisson B, Domenichini S, Bouchez D, Giglione C, Meinnel T (2007) N-myristoylation regulates the SnRK1 pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 2804–2821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Polevoda B, Arnesen T, Sherman F (2009) A synopsis of eukaryotic Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferases: Nomenclature, subunits and substrates. BMC Proc 3(Suppl 6): S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Polevoda B, Brown S, Cardillo TS, Rigby S, Sherman F (2008) Yeast Nα-terminal acetyltransferases are associated with ribosomes. J Cell Biochem 103: 492–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Polevoda B, Cardillo TS, Doyle TC, Bedi GS, Sherman F (2003) Nat3p and Mdm20p are required for function of yeast NatB Nα-terminal acetyltransferase and of actin and tropomyosin. J Biol Chem 278: 30686–30697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Polevoda B, Sherman F (2003) N-terminal acetyltransferases and sequence requirements for N-terminal acetylation of eukaryotic proteins. J Mol Biol 325: 595–622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ree R, Myklebust LM, Thiel P, Foyn H, Fladmark KE, Arnesen T (2015) The N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa10 is essential for zebrafish development. Biosci Rep 35: e00249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Reid DW, Nicchitta CV (2015) Diversity and selectivity in mRNA translation on the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16: 221–231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rosso MG, Li Y, Strizhov N, Reiss B, Dekker K, Weisshaar B (2003) An Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence tag-based reverse genetics. Plant Mol Biol 53: 247–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sessions A, Burke E, Presting G, Aux G, McElver J, Patton D, Dietrich B, Ho P, Bacwaden J, Ko C, et al. (2002) A high-throughput Arabidopsis reverse genetics system. Plant Cell 14: 2985–2994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Singer JM, Shaw JM (2003) Mdm20 protein functions with Nat3 protein to acetylate Tpm1 protein and regulate tropomyosin-actin interactions in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7644–7649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Starheim KK, Arnesen T, Gromyko D, Ryningen A, Varhaug JE, Lillehaug JR (2008) Identification of the human Nα-acetyltransferase complex B (hNatB): A complex important for cell-cycle progression. Biochem J 415: 325–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Damme P, Lasa M, Polevoda B, Gazquez C, Elosegui-Artola A, Kim DS, De Juan-Pardo E, Demeyer K, Hole K, Larrea E, et al. (2012) N-terminal acetylome analyses and functional insights of the N-terminal acetyltransferase NatB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 12449–12454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Damme P, Hole K, Pimenta-Marques A, Helsens K, Vandekerckhove J, Martinho RG, Gevaert K, Arnesen T (2011) NatF contributes to an evolutionary shift in protein N-terminal acetylation and is important for normal chromosome segregation. PLoS Genet 7: e1002169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weyer FA, Gumiero A, Lapouge K, Bange G, Kopp J, Sinning I (2017) Structural basis of HypK regulating N-terminal acetylation by the NatA complex. Nat Commun 8: 15726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xu F, Huang Y, Li L, Gannon P, Linster E, Huber M, Kapos P, Bienvenut W, Polevoda B, Meinnel T, et al. (2015) Two N-terminal acetyltransferases antagonistically regulate the stability of a nod-like receptor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27: 1547–1562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES