Skip to main content
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2019 Dec 31;27(2):762–767. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.12.033

Assessment of risk, extinction, and threats to Himalayan yew in Pakistan

Javaid Iqbal a, Richard Meilan b, Bushra Khan a,
PMCID: PMC6997851  PMID: 32210698

Abstract

Himalayan yew (Taxus wallichiana) is in high demand due to the presence of taxol in its bark, needles, and seeds. This metabolite is used for the treatment of breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, Himalayan yew wood is used to prepare slabs (Tabai), coffins (Taabut), for graveyards. Due to illegal cutting of plant parts and other anthropogenic pressures, Himalayan yew is endangered, and threatened with extinction, in Himalaya. This species grows slowly and regenerates poorly, primarily due to low production and delayed germination (1.5–2 years) of its seeds. The study being reported here was conducted to assess the factors (natural and anthropogenic) threatening this species. Nine valleys (Miandam, Kalam, Shinko, Beha, Lalku, Shahgram, Bishigram, Gurnai, and Daral) in the Swat district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan, have stands of Himalayan yew that were selected for the study. Before the survey was conducted, five informal discussions were carried out to identify people to be interviewed. A survey was conducted with 225 key informants in these valleys concerning the threats associated with this species. Nineteen percent of the respondents felt that the main problem was lack of awareness, while 17% indicated over-harvesting (peeling bark, lopping branches, etc.), and 13% thought it was slow growth. Other reasons for Himalayan yew decline included various anthropogenic pressures, such as: overgrazing, 15%; agriculture, 11%; roof construction, 9%; fuelwood, 7%; decoration, 5%; medicinal use, 3%; and other, 1% (e.g., utility poles, as blades in water turbine because of its hard nature). The results of this study suggest that there is an immediate need to protect T. wallichiana by increasing awareness of its importance and the threats from over-grazing; cuttings (peeling bark, lopping branches, etc.); and other damaging, anthropogenic activities. Biotechnological tools, such as vegetative propagation and in-vitro regeneration, could be practiced in nurseries and laboratories to produce large numbers of healthy, juvenile plants. In addition to in-situ and ex-situ conservation and management, there is a need for local community involvement in the large-scale reforestation efforts.

Keywords: Assessment, Conservation, Extinction, Taxol, Taxus wallichiana, Threats

1. Introduction

Himalayan forests are among the globe’s most depleted (Shaheen et al., 2011), and their degradation has resulted from nomadic activities, overgrazing, and tree harvesting (Ahmad et al., 1990, Ahmad et al., 2012). One component of these forests, Himalayan yew (Taxus wallichiana), which has medicinal value, has become endangered (Samant et al., 1998, Samant, 1999). This species is known as Banrya in Pushto, Barmi in Urdu and Hindi, and common yew or Himalayan yew in English (Mulliken and Crofton, 2008).

Species within the genus Taxus (family Taxaceae) are evergreen gymnosperms that are widely distributed throughout the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere (Clapham et al., 1962, Krüssmann, 1983, Rehder, 1971, Raudolf, 1974, Voliotis, 1986). The species has needle-shaped leaves and bright red fruit (Figure 1).In Pakistan, it is found in moist, temperate forests of the following regions: Swat, Murree, Galliat, Hazara, Kaghan, Kashmir, Kurram, and Chitral (Poudel et al., 2014). Taxus species are present at a wide range of elevations (Bhatt and Sachan, 2004), but typically found between 1800 and 3300 m (Farjon, 2001, Xu et al., 2009). They grow better in the understory of moist, cool forested habitats, temperate to subtropical climates (Price, 1990). Due to its shade-tolerant nature, Taxus species are often found growing under the canopy of other tree species, such as: Abies pindrow, Betula utilizes, Pinus wallichiana, Acer cesium, Rhododendron arboretum, and Quercus semecarpifolia (Rikhari et al., 1998, Samant et al., 2002, Joshi, 2002, Pant, 2005).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Leaves and fruit (bright red berries) of Himalayan yew (Taxus wallichiana).

Himalayan yew flowers during March and April and its seeds ripen between September and November. Generally, regeneration of this species is best in shady and moist microsites that are undisturbed (Rikhari et al., 1998). It can tolerate strong winds, frost, and drought, and usually grows on soil derived from limestone (Clapham et al., 1962).

Yew is a valuable medicinal plant, especially for its taxine alkaloids and 10-diacetyl baccatin III (DAB) content in its seeds, bark, and leaves (Miller, 1980). The latter is a precursor to paclitaxel, a drug sold under the tradename Taxol, which is used as chemotherapy to treat ovarian, breast, and lung cancer. At the start, the tree exploitation was for bark, but later its demand shifted to leaves, which are also a source of paclitaxel. Its anticancer properties were first reported in 1964 (Rowinsky et al., 1990, Appendin, 1993). Annually, the worldwide demand for the taxol is 800 to1000 kilograms. Approximately, 2–3 million kg of biomass is annually harvested whereas the sustainable rate of harvesting is estimated to be 0.6 million kg per year (Nimasow et al., 2015). In addition to Taxol, Himalayan yew is a source of Zarnab, an herbal drug used in the Unani medical system. The leaves and bark are also used to treat asthma, insect bites, and bronchitis and it is considered an aphrodisiac. In Himalaya high-altitude regions, local communities use the bark for the treatment of colds and cough by making a traditional tea (Purohit et al., 2001). The paste of the bark is applied externally for headaches cure and is included in plaster casts for fractured bones (Gaur, 1999). Yew wood is very durable and hard and, thus, desirable for manufacture carving, furniture, and as a fuel.

Taxus species have become threatened due to their small population size, slow germination from seed, slow propagation, narrow range, habitat specificity, destructive harvesting, overgrazing, high value, climate change, and habitat loss (Samant, 1999, Pant and Samant, 2008). The long-term impact of harsh climatic conditions with severe disturbances due to solar radiation, temperature extremes, cold winds that are related to both community and individual stands of yew are affecting the anatomy, physiology and behavioral individualities of yew; in particular the vegetative propagation of yew (Gegechkori 2018). Young plants require dense shade and shelter, they do not successively grow in the areas where forests have been cleared. Although trees of yew grow slowly they can become quite large because of their longevity. Some English yews that were planted in churchyards are over 1,000 years old (Lewington and Parker, 1999). Mostly the heights of yew species range from 6 to 12 m, but open-grown English yew trees can achieve heights of 12–25 m and trunk girths of up to 17 m (Lewington and Parker, 1999, Farr, 2008). It has been reported that the survival and growth of this species decline when the thickness of its bark is reduced to less than 0.43 cm (Purohit et al., 2001).

Currently, little information is available regarding the size and status of Taxus populations (Anon., 2004). The bark of 6 mature trees is required for getting one dose of paclitaxel. Trees are being damaged extensively by bark peeling, but also by lopping and grazing. The extent of canopy damage caused by the latter two is likely to have serious consequences for biomass yield, natural regeneration, and survival of the plant. Collectively, these activities, along with poor regeneration, are responsible for the fast decline in yew population in the Himalaya (Rikhari et al., 1998). This species is now classified as ‘endangered’ in the Himalayan region (García et al., 2000, [ICIMOD], 2004, Wu and Raven, 1999; and IUCN, 2008).

2. Study area

This study was conducted in the district of Swat, which is in the north of KP, between 30° and 72° east longitude at 35° north latitude (Fig. 2). The Swat Valley altitude ranges from 975 to 2900 m. In this region, temperatures range from −2 °C to 34 °C and average annual precipitation is 1000–1200 mm. In Swat about 20% of the land area is forested. The government has designated areas concentrated north of Kalam and Madyan as “Protected Forest”. Himalayan yew is found in the forests of Swat in the Kalam, Miandam, Beha, Lalku, Shahgram, Gurnai, Bhishigran, Daral and Shinko valleys. Information about these valleys including coordinates, human population, number of households, and forested area (ha) are mentioned in Table 1. In Miandam, small, medium, and large trees of T. wallichiana can be found, while dispersed, medium-sized trees can be found in the other valleys (Figure 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

GIS maps showing the distribution of Taxus wallichiana in the Swat District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Table 1.

Information about the valleys in which Taxus wallichiana is found, including coordinates, human population, number of households, and forested area in Swat District, KP, Pakistan.

Valley Latitude Longitude Altitude Population Household Forested area (ha)
Beha 35.06546 72.29633 1596 5466 654 4120.43
Bishigram 35.08342 72.66615 3494 12,000 1204 3710.82
Daral 35.2171 72.37477 3212 5629 498 3350.46
Gurnai 35.23482 72.58968 1907 3796 479 1833.26
Kalam 35.48457 72.57664 2112 25,000 4543 38080.0
Lalku 35.14084 72.38587 1985 4800 684 5435.87
Miandam 35.05409 72.56485 1888 62,229 6223 14548.0
Shahgram 35.15104 72.52381 1497 4356 589 5678.43
Shinko 35.22271 72.42582 2993 7900 612 4567.65

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Taxus wallichiana tree growing in the Kalam Valley, KP, Pakistan. Bark was illicitly stripped from its stem and branches.

3. Material and methods

The study was conducted during 2017–2018 in nine valleys of the Swat district, namely: Miandam, Lalku, Kalam, Beha, Shinko, Bishigram, Shahgram, Gurnai, and Daral. An average of five informal discussions with the local people of these valleys was carried out to identify key informants. The key factors threatening Himalayan yew were identified through community consultation or in-depth discussions between the key informants and interviewers. Expert-reviewed questionnaires were used to collect data through these in-person interviews. Before the survey was conducted, five informal discussions were carried out to identify people to be interviewed. A total of 225 interviews were conducted, 25 in each of the selected valleys (Table 2). Field observations were based on a checklist on the morphological features and habitat of Himalayan yew.

Table 2.

Number of informal discussions and informant interviewers.

Valley name Informal discussions Key informant interviews
Miandam 6 25
Lalku 4 25
Kalam 4 25
Beha 6 25
Shinko 4 25
Bishigram 6 25
Shahgram 4 25
Gurnai 5 25
Daral 6 25

4. Results and discussions

Table 3 lists the 10 factors (ranked in descending order of importance) that were identified as being most threatening to Himalayan yew and some examples of their uses in the Swat District. The percentage of respondents to these threatening factors is shown through the graph (Fig. 4). Table 4 shows the level of threatening factors and its destructive effects (1st to 6th level score is given, 6th level is the most and 1st level is the least destructive threat). Around 19% of the respondents felt that a lack of awareness of the indigenous people was the main threat to Himalayan yew, followed by its many uses and management strategies. Our results are consistent with those of Mesfin et al. (2013), who concluded that the main reason for the decline of this species is the lack of awareness. Similarly, Hizikias et al. (2011) reported that 90% of their respondents indicated that lack of awareness in nearby communities was the greatest threat to Himalayan yew, and that people paid little attention to its management. Knowledge of its importance as a medicinal plant is known by a few of the local healers.

Table 3.

Reasons for threats and uses of Taxus wallichiana in the Swat District K.P, Pakistan.

Threats Respondents Rank Reasons/Uses
1 Lack of awareness 43 1st Lack of knowledge about the importance of the species
2 Over-harvesting/Deforestation 38 2nd Peeling bark, lopping branches, etc. Figure 3 Used in Slabs (tabai), coffin (taabut) in the graveyard
3 Over-grazing 34 3rd Its leaves are fodder for animals (goats and sheep)
4 Slow Growing 29 4th Due to its long seed dormancy period i.e. 1.5 to 2 years
5 Agriculture 25 5th Farming practices in the forest which removes the fresh germinating seeds
6 Construction 20 6th Furniture, roofs, and eaves
7 Firewood 16 7th Local people use the species for cooking purposes and by burning its wood for keeping themselves warm in cold weather
8 Decoration purpose 11 8th Wood carving because of its hard nature and beautiful red color
9 Medicinal use 7 9th Used for curing many diseases in the local areas by local Hakim
10 Other 2 10th Used as utility poles in the time of Wali-e-Swat (the leader of the princely Swat state, ruled therefrom 1926 to 1969) and as blades in water turbines to cut the water flow because of the hard nature of wood.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Percentages of threats (natural and anthropogenic) to Taxus wallichiana in Swat district, KP, Pakistan.

Table 4.

Level of threatening factors and its destructive effects (1st to 6th level score is given, 6th level is the most and 1st level is the least destructive threat).

Threatening factor Level of threat
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
1 Over-harvesting/Deforestation √√
2 Over-grazing √√
3 Slow Growing √√
4 Agriculture √√
5 Construction √√
6 Firewood √√
7 Decoration √√
8 Medicinal use √√
9 Lack of awareness √√
10 Others √√

Key: 1st = Very Low, 2nd = Low, 3rd = Medium, 4th = Medium, 5th = High, 6th = Very High.

According to our survey, 17% decline is due to the illicit harvesting (peeling bark, lopping branches, etc. Figure 3). This is done to satisfy the basic need of firewood for heating and cooking. Deforestation has been recognized by others as one of the reasons (Mesfin et al., 2013, Paul et al., 2013). This issue, which was also mentioned by Paul et al. (2013), leads many giant trees to die out in their natural habitat, which has negative effects on the growth and survival of the Himalayan yew as a species. Globally the main reasons for the decline of yew populations are widespread deforestation and selective felling (Jahn, 1991, Tittensor, 1980).

Leaves from Himalayan yew are a preferred source of forage by cattle, goats, sheep, and other livestock. Thus, 15% of the respondents thought that over-grazing (ranked 3rd, see Table 3) was an important contributor to its decline. Similar findings were reported in previous studies (Purohit et al., 2001, Mesfin et al., 2013, Bugala, 1978).

Thirteen percent of the respondents to our survey indicated that a key cause of Himalayan yew depletion is its slow growth (ranked 4th) and its long period of seed dormancy (1.5 to 2 years). These results were consistent with those of Paul et al. (2013), who also concluded that the large numbers of the bright red berries were eaten by animals (e.g., birds, rats, monkeys, etc.), leading to a lack of regeneration.

Our work revealed that a key factor in the decline of Himalayan yew is agriculture (ranked 5th; Table 3), as people cultivate crops (e.g., potatoes, beans, etc.) in patches of the forests containing it, the slow-growing seeds were not able to survive naturally in areas that are cleared for agriculture. Its slow and low regeneration, and degradation of old populations in its natural habitat have been identified as key problems for this species (Nimasow et al., 2015). Other researchers have concluded that agriculture in the forests is one of the main reasons for the depletion of this species (Mesfin et al., 2009, Mesfin et al., 2013, Lulekal et al., 2008).

The wood from Himalayan yew is hard and has a beautiful color. As a result, it is widely used as a construction material for eaves, roofs, and furniture. Nine percent of people interviewed felt that this use was an important reason for the decline of this species (ranked 6th, see Table 3). Purohit et al. (2001) reported similar non-medicinal values for this species. They also mentioned the use of its wood for carving and beehive construction.

Paul et al. (2013) described how the use of branches as a source of fuelwood for cooking was a major contributor to the disappearance of Himalayan yew. In addition, Mesfin et al. (2013) concluded that firewood and construction were the key reasons for the depletion of this species. In our study, 7% of the respondents identified this as the primary factor (ranked 7th, see Table 3).

Finally, 5%, 3%, and 1% of the respondents attributed the decline in the numbers of Himalayan yew to the durability and decorative properties of its wood (ranked 8th), medicinal purposes by local people (ranked 9th), and utility poles and blades in water turbines (ranked 10th), respectively. As the bark of the species is used by the local people to cure many diseases, it was reported that when it is removed beyond a limit of 0.43 cm (average thickness of bark), its growth and survival declined significantly (Purohit et al., 2001).

Our findings suggest that immediate action is needed to save Himalayan yew from harvesting (peeling bark, lopping branches, etc.), over-grazing, and other destructive activities by making the local people aware of its importance by arranging workshops, seminars, etc. (Lanker et al., 2010).

5. Conclusion

The results of the present study indicate that both anthropogenic and natural factors are affecting the survival of Himalayan yew. Existing mismanagement of Himalayan yew, lack of awareness, over-harvesting, and over-grazing are the main anthropogenic factors leading to the decline of this species. However, natural factors, such as slow growth and long seed dormancy periods are also threating to this species. Other key factors identified by respondents include use for utility poles and as blades in water turbines. Lack of awareness was identified as the most threatening factor. Therefore, awareness-creation campaigns should be implemented so citizens are cognizant of the importance of the management of medicinal plants and may pass this knowledge down to future generations. It is advisable to develop management strategies and establish in-vitro (labs) and in-situ (nurseries) conservation programs to produce rooted plants from cuttings and seeds for reforestation efforts.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement

This project was funded by the National Research Project for Universities (NRPU), Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan.

Author contributions

Bushra Khan conceived and designed the experiment, Javaid Iqbal conducted the survey from the key respondents, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Prof. Richard Meilan reviewed the Manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors (HEC) had no contribution to the Survey design; in the collection, analyses, or data interpretation; in the manuscript writing, and in the decision to publish the results.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. [ICIMOD] International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development 2004. Participatory forest management implication for policy and human resources development in Hind Kush Himalayas. Kathmandu (Nepal): ICIMOD: 79.
  2. [IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature 2008. Red List of threatened species; [cited 2009 Jul 13]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org
  3. Ahmad A., Rawat J.S., Rai S.C. An analysis of the Himalayan environment and guidelines for its management and ecologically sustainable development. Environmentalist. 1990;10(4):281–298. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmad S.S., Abbasi Q., Jabeen R., Shah M.T. The decline of conifer forest cover in Pakistan: a GIS approach. Pak. J. Bot. 2012;44(2):511–514. [Google Scholar]
  5. Appendin G. Taxol (paclitaxel): historical and ecological aspects. Fitoterapia. 1993;64:5–25. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhatt B.P., Sachan M.S. Firewood consumption pattern of different tribal communities in Northeast India. Energy Policy. 2004;32(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bugala, W., 1978. Systematics and variability. Foreign Scientific Publications Department of the National Center for Scientific, Technical, and Economic Information, (for the Department of Agriculture and the National Science Foundation, Washington DC), Warsaw, 15-32.
  8. Clapham A.R., Tutin T.G., Warburg E.F. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge (UK): 1962. Flora of the British Isles; p. 263. [Google Scholar]
  9. Farjon A. Royal Botanic Gardens; 2001. World checklist and bibliography of conifers. [Google Scholar]
  10. Farr K. Int. Expert Workshop on CITES Non-Detriment Findings (Cancun, Mexico) 2008. Genus level approach to Taxus species; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  11. García D., Zamora R., Hódar J.A., Gómez J.M., Castro J. Yew (Taxus baccata L.) regeneration is facilitated by fleshy-fruited shrubs in Mediterranean environments. Biol. Conserv. 2000;95(1):31–38. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gaur R. North West Himalaya; Transmedia: 1999. Flora of the district Garhwal. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gegechkori A. Patterns of distribution and survival of European yew (Taxus baccata L.) in an alpine tree line ecotone in the Greater Caucasus (Georgia) Ann. Agrarian Sci. 2018;16(2):170–176. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hizikias E.B., Aynekulu E., Mekuria W., Endal D. Management, use, and ecology of medicinal plants in the degraded dry lands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011;5(3):309–318. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jahn G. Temperate deciduous forests of Europe. Ecosystems of the World. 1991 [Google Scholar]
  16. Joshi H.C. Assessment of habitat diversity, forest vegetation and human dependence in the buffer zone of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve of west Himalaya. Int. J. Sustain. Develop., World Ecol. 2002;11(3):326–336. [Google Scholar]
  17. Krüssmann G. 2nd rev. ed. Verlag; Berlin: 1983. Manual of cultivated conifers. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lanker U., Malik A.R., Gupta N.K., Butola J.S. Natural regeneration status of the endangered medicinal plant, Taxus baccata Hook. F. syn. T. wallichiana, in northwest Himalaya. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci., Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 2010;6(1-2):20–27. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lewington, A., Parker, E., 1999. Fig: Sacred tree of the Old World. Ancient trees: Trees that live for, 1000, 161–165.
  20. Lulekal E., Kelbessa E., Bekele T., Yineger H. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Mana Angetu District, southeastern Ethiopia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2008;4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mesfin F., Demissew S., Teklehaymanot T. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Wonago Woreda, SNNPR, Ethiopia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2009;5(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-5-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mesfin K., Tekle G., Tesfay T. Assessment of threatening factors of medicinal plant species in Samre district, south-eastern Tigray, northern Ethiopia. J. Med. Plants. 2013;1(4):38–42. [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller R.W. A brief survey of Taxus alkaloids and other taxane derivatives. J. Nat. Prod. 1980;43(4):425–437. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mulliken, T., Crofton, P., 2008. Review of the status, harvest, trade, and management of seven Asian CITES-listed medicinal and aromatic plant species. BfN-Skripten, Federal Agency for Natural Conservation, Bonn, Germany, 11–138.
  25. Nimasow G., Dai Nimasow O., Rawat J.S., Norbu L. Conservation efforts of an important medicinal plant (Taxus baccata Linn.) in West Kameng district of Arunachal Pradesh (India) Earth. 2015;4(3-1):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pant S. Kumaon University; Nainital: 2005. Assessment of plant diversity and ethnobotany of mornaula reserve forest in kumaon, West Himalaya. Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pant S., Samant S.S. Population ecology of the endangered Himalayan Yew in Khokhan Wildlife Sanctuary of North Western Himalaya for conservation management. J. Mountain Sci. 2008;5(3):257–264. [Google Scholar]
  28. Paul A., Bharali S., Khan M.L., Tripathi O.P. Anthropogenic disturbances led to risk of extinction of Taxus wallichiana Zuccarini, an endangered medicinal tree in Arunachal Himalaya. Natural Areas J. 2013;33(4):447–454. [Google Scholar]
  29. Poudel R.C., Moller M., Li D.-Z., Shah A., Gao M. Genetic diversity, demographical history, and conservation aspects of the endangered yew tree Taxus contorta (syn. Taxus fuana) in Pakistan. Tree Genet. Genomes. 2014;10(3):653–665. In this issue. [Google Scholar]
  30. Price R.A. The genera of Taxaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arboretum. 1990;71(1):69–91. [Google Scholar]
  31. Purohit A., Maikhuri R.K., Rao K.S., Nautiyal S. Impact of bark removal on survival of Taxus baccata L. (Himalayan yew) in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Curr. Sci. 2001:586–590. [Google Scholar]
  32. Raudolf, P.O., Taxus, L., Yew In Schopmeyer, C.S., 1974. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Seeds of woody plants in the United States (450).
  33. Rehder A. The Macmillan Company; New York: 1971. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rikhari H.C., Palni L.M.S., Sharma S., Nandi S.K. Himalayan yew: stand structure, canopy damage, regeneration and conservation strategy. Environ. Conserv. 1998;25(4):334–341. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rowinsky E.K., Cazenave L.A., Donehower R.C. Taxol: a novel investigational antimicrotubule agent. JNCI: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990;82(15):1247–1259. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.15.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Samant S.S. Diversity, nativity, and endemism of vascular plants in a part of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve in west Himalaya I. Himalayan Biosphere Reserve (Biannual Bull.) 1999;1(1 & 2):1–28. [Google Scholar]
  37. Samant, S.S., Dhar, U., Palni, L.M.S., 1998. Medicinal Plants of Indian Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan.
  38. Samant, S.S., Joshi, H.C., Arya, S.C., Pant, S., 2002. Studies on the structure, composition, and changes of the vegetation in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve of West Himalaya. Biosphere Reserves in India and their Management. New Delhi, Kerala Forest Research Institute and Ministry of Environment and Forests, 133–139.
  39. Shaheen H., Qureshi R.A., Ullah Z., Ahmad T. Anthropogenic pressure on the western Himalayan moist temperate forests of Bagh, Azad Jammu & Kashmir. Pak. J. Bot. 2011;43(1):695–703. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tittensor R.M. Ecological history of yew Taxus baccata L. in southern England. Biol. Conserv. 1980;17(4):243–265. [Google Scholar]
  41. Voliotis D. Historical and Environmental Significance of the Yew (TAXUS BACCATA L.) Israel J. Botany. 1986;35(1):47–52. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H., 1999. Flora of China. Vol. 4. Science. Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden.
  43. Xu J., Grumbine R.E., Shrestha A., Eriksson M., Yang X., Wang Y.U.N., Wilkes A. The melting Himalayas: cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conserv. Biol. 2009;23(3):520–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES