Abstract
The extensive use of nondegradable chemical pesticides for pest management has developed serious environmental hazards. This has necessitated the urgent need to switch over to an alternative mode of biopesticide development for mass agriculture and field crop protection. Azadirachta indica A. Juss (commonly known as neem) houses a plethora of bioactive secondary metabolites with azadirachtin being the most active constituent explored in the sector of ecofriendly and biodegradable biopesticides characterized by low toxicity toward nontarget organisms. It has been reported that the highest content of azadirachtin and related limonoids is present in the seeds, available once in a year. Moreover, the inconsistent content and purity of the metabolites in whole plant makes it imperative to tap the potential of in vitro plant tissue culture applications, which would allow for several controlled manipulations for better yield and productivities. This review gives a summarized literature of the applied research and achievements in plant cell/hairy cultures of A. indica A. Juss mainly in context with the biopesticide azadirachtin and applications thereof.
Keywords: Azadirachtin, Differentiated plant cell tissue/hairy root, In vitro mass propagation
Abbreviations
- AZRL
azadirachtin and related limonoids
- DW
dry weight
- MS medium
Murashige and Skoog medium
- ON medium
Ohyama and Nitsch's
1. Introduction
Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss, family Meliaceae) is a reserve of about 300 important potentially active compounds responsible for the several biological functions of the plant such as blood purification, anti‐inflammation, antitumor, bactericidal properties, and as insect repellent 1, 2, 3. The limonoids (tetraterpenoids) constitute one‐third of the total metabolites present 4, 5. Of these the most noteworthy ingredients include azadirachtin, an insecticide (mainly Azadirachtin A). This compound is generally used in commercial insecticides 6, whereas others such as salanim and nimbin are used as a spermicide and anti‐inflammatory in vertebrates 7, 8, 9. The use of A. indica derivatives as a biopesticide has conspicuous advantages of easy availability, biodegradability, low toxicity toward nontargets such as pollinators and vertebrates, systematic action, low persistence levels in the environment, and ability to control a wide range of insects/pests including Siphonaptera and Thysanoptera 1, 6, 10. The plant extract consists of a mélange of complex bioactives all of which affect different portions of the insect life cycle, thereby, preventing the pests from developing a resistance toward it (Agro Forestry Tree Database). Azadirachtin is reportedly active on about 500 insect species 11.
As far as the commercial aspect is considered the major product of interest is the neem seed oil. Neem insecticide was registered under the name Margosan‐O by the environmental protection agency (EPA) in the Unites States way back in 1985 12. Since then several neem‐based products have been registered under various trade names, “Green Gold R neem extract,” “Align TM,” “Azatin R,” and “Turplex TM.” Various companies are also actively involved in the formulation of neem‐based products that include Neemix 90EC (azadirachtin concentration reported to be 90 g/L), Neemmzid, Trilogy 90EC, Bio‐neem, Turplex, and Bollwship (Thermo Trilogy); Fortune Aza and Fortune biotech (Fortune); NeemAzal (Trifolio‐M), Kayneem (Krishi Rasyan), Neemolin (Rallis), Surfire, and Neemachtin (Consep), and Nimbecidine (T stanes), all obtained by extraction from the natural plants 13. The main bottleneck in the conventional process of extraction of azadirachtin is the variability imposed by the heterozygosity in seeds resulting in fluctuating secondary metabolite content 14, 15, 16 and uncontrollable seasonal and geographical constraints.
Azadirachtin is mainly localized in the seed kernels (0.2–0.6%) that remain viable for a limited span of time with a decrease of 32% in around 4 months of storage precluding the ex situ processes of crop improvement and collection of germplasm 17, 18, 19. Another major concern is the amount of aflatoxins (present on the seed surface, primarily arising out of microbial growth on sugars leaking out from seed burst) that get extracted along with compounds of interest 18. Moreover, the structural complexity hinders the chemical synthesis 5, 18.
In this regard, plant cell/hairy root culture offers several foreseeable benefits to overcome the above‐mentioned obstacles along with facilitating mass scale production in bioreactors. Although dynamic research efforts have been directed toward the development of successful in vitro cultures for A. indica not much data is available on the same with most of the reports focused on extraction/analysis as well as the biological and chemistry aspects. The present review is aimed at critically assessing the recent developments in the zone of plant cell and hairy root cultures for improved yield of azadirachtin. Wherever not mentioned, azadirachtin refers to the total extract. Several other relevant reviews have been cited for the reader's reference.
2. Elucidation of mechanism of action
All parts of the A. indica tree possess insecticidal activity but it is the seed kernel that is the most effective. The total pesticidal active ingredients are together called “triterpene” more specifically “limnoids.” The four best limnoids are as follows: azadirachtin, salannin, meliantriol, and nimbin. Azadirachtin itself comprises of a group of compounds of which, Azadirachtin A is found in plenty and is biologically the most potent 6. Till date nine types of azadirachtin, Azadirachtin A to Azadirachtin I, have been isolated from the neem seed extract 20.
Azadirachtin (molecular formula C35H 44O16) is a highly oxidized tetranortriterpenoid with the surface covered with several intimately associated reactive groups, namely acetate, tiglate ester, methyl esters, alcohol, epoxide, and vinyl ether. This overabundance of the reactive groups results in a complicated chemistry. The full structure and chemistry has been elucidated recently by Ley and co‐workers 21. Azadirachtin is known to have a rapid effect by mimicking the activity of endocrine and nueroendocrine system 22, thereby, interfering with the insect life cycle at different time points 8. Observations of the behavioral pattern of some parasitic larvae namely, Spodopteralittoralis and Mamestrabrassicae have suggested that azadirachtin might function by acting as a feeding deterrent 8, 23, 24. This property adversely affects the ecdysteroid and juvenile hormones thus preventing pest proliferation. The sensitivity of various fungi, protozoans, and viruses toward this compound has also been indicated 18, 25. In addition, it markedly reduces the viability of the eggs.
Analysis at the molecular level revealed the blockage of the cell cycle (due to inhibitory effect of azadirachtin on microtubule polymerization) 26 and onset of apoptosis that explains the retarded development of the pests 27, 28, 29. Azadirachtin being a highly reactive molecule has several cellular components as targets both in the nucleus and cytoplasm. It causes a direct damage to the DNA 30 apart from altering the activity of various genes and proteins 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31. Besides its use as a biopesticide, the potential of azadirachtin has also been extensively explored in inhibiting the reproductive cycle in malaria parasite, as a larvicide and in the inhibition of dengue virus type‐2 replication 18, 32. It also functions against the common ectoparasite, Argulus sp., known to infect ornamental fishes 33.
3. Trends in azadirachtin production from plant tissue culture
3.1. Biosynthesis in undifferentiated cultures
Plant tissue culture technology possesses an immense potential for a sustainable production of high‐valued metabolites 34. In vitro azadirachtin production from undifferentiated callus and cell suspension cultures has been previously studied by Allan and co‐workers 35. The effect of calli differentiation and the source of parent explants have been examined by Nair et al. 36. These authors by utilizing 13 explants estimated a maximum Azadirachtin A amount of 11 790 μg/g dry weight (DW) in the callus derived from intermodal segments. Shifting to suspension culture, however, reduced the biosynthetic capacity. It was inferred that some kind of a cell to cell contact mechanism might have played a role in the earlier callus culture that was lost on transfer to the suspension medium. Another interesting observation in the study was that although the flower buds otherwise accumulated very small concentrations of Azadirachtin A, the callus raised from different floral parts showed multifold increase in the content that emphasized on the major role played by differentiation. Singh and Chaturvedi 16 quantified higher levels of azadirachtin in callus derived from redifferentiated zygotic embryo cultures (2.33 mg/g DW) compared to that from dedifferentiated callus obtained from leaves. In this case too, the content was reported to be strongly regulated by the degree of differentiation with higher amounts of the compound in the redifferentiated calli. Even then the accumulation of the azadirachtin was several folds lower than in the seed (7.41 mg/g DW), leaf (5.49 mg/g DW), and ovary (1.38 mg/g DW) of the whole plant. Prakash et al. 37 developed callus cultures via seeds procured from various geographical locations characterized by different azadirachtin content. The azadirachtin accumulation in the callus was found to be strongly linked to the content in the parent seed kernel indicating the influence of the genetic makeup, geography, and explant source. Variability was observed in the azadirachtin content among the cell lines developed from seeds of different locations as well as from the leaf explants. Maximum concentration of Azadirachtin A (1.89 mg/g) was detected in the AG‐43 cell line derived from the most potent seed kernels Ai43 procured from Trivandrum, Kerala, which reportedly had the highest azadirachtin content (5.13 mg/g DW) of all the seed kernels examined. The content was approximately 19 times higher than that in the lowest producing cell line, Ai‐41 (Jodhpur) (0.21 mg/g DW) and also significantly greater than the cell lines obtained from leaves (0.23 mg/g).
In a very recent study on A. indica, NAA was found to be more favorable for callus induction as opposed to 2,4‐D (2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid). When MS (Murashige and Skoog) medium was supplemented with 1‐naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) (2 mgl/L) + 6‐benzylaminopurine (BAP) (0.5 mg/L) leaf callus proliferated. Authors also observed the presence of rhizogenesis and embryonic masses, which indicated the possible morphogenic potential of the developed leaf callus. However, the azadirachtin content was not quantified 38. Spieth et al. 39 used 4200 explants under different light and dark rhythms. Successful callus induction and proliferation was achieved in MS media with NAA and BAP under 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod in 90% of the explants. The formation of transformed callus infected with Agrobacterium tumefaciens has been earlier described 40, however no data on azadirachtin accumulation are available till date. As a result comparisons based on azadirachtin content with nontransformed cultures are not possible.
The biosynthesis of secondary metabolites although genetically controlled is considered to have an exquisite sensitivity to alterations in nutritional and environmental factors 41 (Table 1). In one of the early studies, Raval et al. 42 tested the effect of basal media with an aim to achieve enhanced azadirachtin and related limonoids (AZRL). After initial experimentation, the authors observed that while MS medium resulted in highest biomass of the suspension, White's medium was favorable for the metabolite accumulation. Catabolite repression was cited as the possible reason for absence of the bioactive compound in the otherwise most commonly used MS and B5 recipes. A modified MS medium with altered nitrate and phosphate content was then devised using response surface methodology, resulting in only slight enhancement in productivity. This tempted the authors to switch from single to two‐stage cultivation also designed using statistical methods. The cultures were transferred from growth to production medium on the ninth day of cultivation resulting in 2.75 mg/L of the bioactive compound. As a benchmark the authors used the azadirachtin in the seed kernels that was in the range of 2–6 mg/g. Although a significant improvement was achieved on switching and modifying the medium, the yield was still on the lower side compared to the intact plants. Another innovative attempt in the above study was the side by side online OTR (oxygen transfer rate) measurement carried out to understand the culture dynamics in a specially designed shake flask vessel, RAMOS. On similar lines, Prakash and Srivastava 43 developed a medium recipe adopting tools such as Placket Burman design and response surface methodology resulting in increased biomass growth of 15.02 g/L as well as azadirachtin biosynthesis of 2.98 mg/g DW (45 mg/L) in suspension cultures. Moreover, these authors by their experiments reported glucose as a better carbon source compared to sucrose. Furthermore, ammonium concentration was observed to inhibit the azadirachtin synthesis while increase in nitrogen content demonstrated a progressive enhancement in the bioactive compound. The impact of medium recipe has been highlighted in other studies as well 44. Cell suspensions derived out of the neem variety Crida‐8 showed extreme sensitivity to the carbon source. A total absence of azadirachtin was reported on reduction in sucrose concentration to 15 g/L. On the other hand, a complete removal of phosphate enriched the intracellular concentrations of the biomolecule to 6.98 mg/L of which 6.94 mg/L was of Azadirachtin A and remaining was of azadirachtin B. On alteration of the nitrate levels keeping the ammonium level constant, a progressive enhancement in the content followed. At 4:1 nitrate ammonium ratio, a 1.5‐fold increase in total azadirachtin (A + B) and enhanced cell mass (8.5%) was reported. Eventually, coupling of the desirable nitrate to ammonium ratio with complete phosphate removal in MS medium led to a 36% increase in the biomass (59.36 g/L). However, the intracellular azadirachtin content was drastically reduced with most of it released in the medium. Spieth et al. 39 suggested optimizing the cell suspension media separately for growth and production. In order to meet this complex challenge a fully automated high‐throughput microbioreactor system was put forward as a future scope of the study that would allow for a fast and controlled batch and fed‐batch screening in 48‐well microtiter plates.
Table 1.
Advances in azadirachtin production from cell suspension and hairy root cultures
| Strategy | Type of culture | Azadirachtin | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medium optimization | |||
| Suspension/callus | 2.79 mg/L | 42 | |
| Suspension/callus | 45 mg/L | 43 | |
| Hairy root | 0.0016% DW | 41 | |
| Hairy root | 73.84 mg/L | 53 | |
| Elicitor addition | |||
| C. Purpurea | Hairy root | 0.074% DW | 41 |
| Jasmonic acid | Hairy root | 0.095% DW | 41 |
| Salicylic acid | Hairy root | 0.14% DW | 41 |
| C. lunata | Hairy root | 7.1 mg/g | 55 |
| Salicylic acid | Hairy root | 4.95 mg/g | 5 |
| MeJA | callus/suspension | 0.2470 μg/g | 46 |
| Anabaena sp. | callus/suspension | 0.32 μg/L | 47 |
| Elicitor combination | callus/suspension | 17.4 mg/g | 55 |
| Precursor addition | |||
| Cholesterol | Hairy root | 3.1 mg/g | 55 |
| Sodium acetate | Suspension | 9.6 mg/g | 48 |
| Permeabilization | |||
| Chitosan | Hairy root | 4.6 mg/L (Int) | 49 |
| DMSO | Hairy root | 4.2 mg/L | 49 |
| Triton X 100 | Hairy root | 10 mg/L (total) | 49 |
| n‐Hexadecane | Suspension | 3.8 mg/g (Int) | 48 |
| Gas phase effect | |||
| Air flow rate | Hairy root | 46.02 mg/L (3.5mg/g) | 56 |
| Oxygen enrichment | Hairy root | 78 mg/L (5.9mg/g) | 57 |
| Model‐based cultivation | |||
| Fed batch bioreactor | Suspension | 82 mg/L (4.1 mg/g) | 51 |
| Continuous culture cell retention | Suspension | 380 mg/L (3.9 mg/g) | 52 |
| Bioreactor cultivation | |||
| Low shear setric impeller | Suspension | 50 mg/L (3.22 mg/g) | 50 |
| Centrifugal impeller | Suspension | 71 mg/L (3.74 mg/g) | 50 |
| Bioreactor+ elicitation | Suspension | 161.1 mg/L (11.5 mg/g) | 47 |
| Integrated | Suspension | 751 mg/L (12.2 mg/g) | 48 |
| Modified bioreactor + mesh | Hairy root | 20.23 mg/L | 59 |
| Modified bioreactor + PUF | Hairy root | 28.52 mg/L | 59 |
| Mist bioreactor | Hairy root | 27.24 mg/L | 60 |
| Integrated | Hairy root | 97.28 mg/L | 54 |
| Content in native plant | |||
| Seeds | 2.6 mg/g DW | 42, 53, 54, 55, 56, 59, 60 | |
| Normal roots | 0.00032% DW | 41 | |
| Seeds | 0.4301 μg/g DW | 5 | |
| Seeds | 12.88 mg/gm DW | 46 | |
| Seeds | 5.13 mg/g DW | 43, 47, 48, 51, 52 | |
The key to successful commercialization of the plant tissue culture technology is by reducing the capital and operating cost. Exogenous additions such as elicitors and biosynthetic pathway intermediates/precursors could be a good ground of study for improved yield making it competitive with respect to other routes of production 45. In one such study, A. indica calli grown in liquid woody plant medium supplemented with casein acid hydrosylate, followed by elicitation with methyl jasmonate yielded highest azadirachtin concentration of 0.2470 μg/g 5. This corresponded to about 57% of the content in the native plant seed used as the starting parent material for initiation of the in vitro cultures. Parameters such as rotational speed and exposure time to the elicitors were also reported to control the yield.
For the first time, a research involving cynobacterial elicitors (Anabaena sp. and Nosto ccarneum) was reported for azadirachtin production 46. Higher protein accumulation was observed in elicited cultures compared to control, which was indicative of higher growth since actively growing cells participate in protein synthesis. The cyanobacterial elicitor Anabaena sp. was capable of increasing the biomass by fivefolds which was otherwise deemed difficult by the authors resulting in a maximum azadirachtin concentration of 0.32 μg/L on the eighth day of cultivation.
Independent screening experiments with elicitors such as jasmonic acid, methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, yeast extract, and yeast extract carbohydrate fraction resulted in two to three fold increase in cell suspension cultures. Considering that each elicitor would affect the cell physiology and defense response in a different manner, response surface methodology was adopted by the authors to study all possible interactions with less experimentation. A synergistic response on exposure to a combination of these elicitors was observed resulting in a fivefold increase in azadirachtin response (15.9 mg/g DW) as compared to control 47. With more insight into the effect of exposure time 17.4 mg/g (DW) of azadirachtin was demonstrated. Various precursors were also supplemented to maintain their optimum/required concentration for increased flow toward the azadirachtin pathway. After several tests sodium acetate was observed to be the most potential precursor (162 mg/L, 9.6 mg/g). Sodium acetate on entering the cell converts first to acetic acid and acetyl coenzyme A, thereby, promoting the energy metabolism 48.
Azadirachtin is known to accumulate intracellularly, precluding cell immobilization and continuous removal, that can be conveniently achieved by the use of cell wall permeabilizers 18. These compounds are generally organic solvents whose selection is based on the log P (the octanol/water partition coefficient of solvent) values 48. Kuruvilla et al. 49 reported enhanced secretion and biosynthesis of azadirachtin in suspension cultures on exposure to DMSO, Chitosan, and Triton X‐100. The exudation of the bioactive compound was maximum at 7.5% DMSO resulting in 4.2 mg/L azadirachtin. Exposure to higher concentrations inhibited the cell growth. On the other hand, Triton X‐100 was effective only at the highest concentration (150 ppm). Chitosan caused a fourfold enhancement in azadirachtin secretion in the external medium. Prakash and Srivastava 48 selected three solvents depending on the log P values namely, n‐hexadecane (with log P = 8.8), di‐n‐butyl phthalate (with log P = 5.4), and 1‐decanol (with log P = 4.0). Only n‐hexadecane (2 and 5% concentrations) could release up to 21% azadirachtin in the medium (10 mg/L, extracellular) with minimum impact on cell viability, possibly due to a higher log P value 48.
A little data are available regarding bioreactor design and operation for suspension/hairy root cultures for azadirachtin synthesis. Prakash and Srivastava 50 compared the metabolite synthesis in a stirred tank bioreactor with a low shear setric impeller and a novel centrifugal impeller (specifications: impeller outer diameter (D) = 82 mm, draft tube inner diameter (d) = 27 mm, blade width (h) = 14 mm, length of the draft tube = 105 mm, blade number = 6, blade angle (β) = 60o). Suspension cultures grown in bioreactor with modified centrifugal impeller demonstrated higher azadirachtin accumulation of 71 mg/L (3.74 mg/g) as opposed to 50 mg/L(3.22 mg/g) with the use of a setric impeller. The results have been attributed to the fact that the centrifugal blades increase the residence time of the gas bubbles that allowed for sufficient oxygen transfer and hence higher oxygen transfer rates. This was verified by the authors from the higher K La values in the presence of the centrifugal impeller. The elicitor combination mentioned previously when replicated in a 3 L bioreactor with setric impeller a threefold enhancement in azadirachtin synthesis (161.1 mg/L; 11.5 mg/g) as opposed to control bioreactor (50 mg/L; 3.2 mg/g) was reported. The volumetric productivity was also significantly higher in elicited bioreactor studies (16.1 mg/(L d)) 46.
Till date there has been only one effort on modeling the bioprocess for A. indica cell cultivation. The developed mathematical model could describe the batch kinetics with reasonable efficiency and was then extrapolated to guide nutrient feeding in fed‐batch mode after incorporating suitable dilution factors. The experimental implementation of the fed‐batch cultivation resulted in 82 mg/L (4.1 mg/g DW) of azadirachtin with a volumetric productivity of 2.41 mg/(L h) in a 3 L bioreactor 51. Eventually, the extrapolation of the model to continuous cultivation and its implementation in bioreactor along with cell retention led to an overall azadirachtin production of 280 mg/L (3.9 mg/g DW) 52. Cell retention was of added advantage as higher dilution rates could be achieved for a rather slow growing plant cell system preventing washout conditions to develop 52. Inspite of drastic variations in the azadirachtin concentrations the yields in the above cases were nearly same because the cell mass was also promoted. Finally, these authors benefited by coupling of various strategies, viz. mathematical model guided continuous cultivation with elicitor addition, precursor feeding, and permeabilization yielding 751 mg/L (12.2 mg/g DW) of azadirachtin along with a volumetric productivity of 7.25 mg/(L h), the highest reported from suspension culture of A. indica so far 48. The various strategies discussed above have been summarized in Table 1.
3.2. Biosynthesis from hairy root culture
Cell suspension cultures being dedifferentiated, there is lack of storage tissue and the product thus released in the culture media is prone to degradation by the enzymes released into the medium. Development of a certain degree of differentiation can make a significant contribution to the synthesis of phytochemicals. Satdive et al. 41 based on their evaluation of different basal media namely, Ohyama and Nitsch (ON), Gamborg (B5) medium, and MS medium, found ON medium the most desirable for increasing the metabolite production in hairy root cultures (0.0166% DW as opposed to 0.00032% DW in normal roots). It was suggested that since ON medium had higher inorganic salt concentration it might have favored both growth and production. Srivastava and Srivastava on the other hand used statistical protocols for a more rapid optimization of nutrient concentrations for hairy root cultures of A. indica. The authors could attain 73.84 mg/L (5.2 mg/g DW) of total azadirachtin, a 68% increase than the unoptimized control 53.
Phytochemical production can be enhanced further via biotic and abiotic stimulations, either singly or in different combinations. A fivefold increase in azadirachtin (0.074% DW) on exposure to Claviceps purpurea filtrate and a sixfold (0.095% DW) and ninefold (0.14% DW) enhancement, respectively, on treatment with signal compounds, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid, were observed by Satdive et al. 41 in Ohyama and Nitsch's medium. For the signaling molecules, maximum azadirachtin accumulation and leaching in the external medium was facilitated at the lowest concentration (100 mM). Another study carried out on hairy root cultures claimed salicylic acid and Curvularia lunata fungal filtrate (1% v/v) as the most potent elicitors. A. indica is known to function against the plant pathogen C. lunata that possibly triggered the azadirachtin biosynthesis (7.1 mg/g DW) sufficiently higher than in the seed kernels 54. The same authors on supplementation of cholesterol as an indirect precursor in hairy root cultures showed the azadirachtin production of 70.42 mg/L (3.1 mg/g DW), again comparable to the content in the seed (2–6 mg/g DW) 55. As per these investigators, the sterol biosynthetic pathway generally diverts the precursor from the azadirachtin production. However, this could be avoided on exogenous additions owing to feedback inhibition of the sterol biosynthesis.
Oxygen, though one of the most important nutrients in the aerobic tissue culture is most scarcely available. This situation is more pronounced in hairy roots owing to their peculiar characteristics 56. A lone study on the effect of modifying the air flow rate/oxygen enrichment in hairy root cultures in context with azadirachtin productivity has been reported by Srivastava and Srivastava 56. First method implemented was the variation in aeration rate wherein azadirachtin productivity of 1.84 mg/(L d) (3.5 mg/g DW) could be attained for aeration volume of 0.8 vvm. Another means of oxygen enhancement attempted by the authors was the supplementation of pure oxygen in the inlet air. This indeed proved to be effective with a threefold increase (4.43 mg/(L d), 5.9 mg/g DW) on exposure to 100% oxygen, however, at the cost of increased production expenditure. Since azadirachtin is a highly oxygenated molecule, higher levels of oxygen in the medium could have promoted its accumulation. Biomass concentration on the other hand decreased beyond 60% v/v of oxygen in air. This was attributed to high oxidative stress leading to cytoxicity lowering the overall mass of the hairy roots. To avoid this interesting method of addition of specific chemicals called the oxygen vectors was tested. The results however were not encouraging and further optimization of the concentrations was suggested by the authors.
The control of the bulk oxygen concentration depending on the demand of the vigorously growing hairy root especially that in the root core could be successfully achieved by a mathematical model described by Srivastava et al. 57.
One of the biggest challenges for commercial exploitation of hairy root cultures is the production bottlenecks. The peculiar morphology limits the use of conventional bioreactor set ups and some specific designs have been developed suiting the culture characteristics and requirements 58 particularly by a single group. Different liquid bioreactor configurations, viz. stirred tank, bubble column, modified bubble column with floating mesh, and modified bubble column with polypropylene foam support (PUF) have been tested to facilitate high‐density hairy cultures of A. indica 59. A severe shearing and necrosis of the roots was observed on cultivation in a conventional stirred tank bioreactor inspite of being equipped with a low shear setric impeller. Similar results were obtained in bubble column bioreactor as well. According to the authors since the hairy roots are shear sensitive and immmobilizing in nature these configurations were not suitable for scale up. Moreover, the completely dispersed roots became a victim of a morphological malfunction, hyperhydricity, hence could not proliferate. Eventually, the authors dealt with these issues by placing the roots onto different supports using two modified stirred tank bioreactors, one incorporating a floating polypropylene mesh and another with polyurethane foam. Azadirachtin volumetric productivity of 1.14 mg/(L d) could be attained in the latter 59. The authors thereafter attempted to implement an integration of growth regulators, permeabilizers, elicitor, and precursor in shake flask resulting in 113 mg/L of azadirachtin. The same when scaled up to a modified stirred tank bioreactor with PUF foam support matrix yielded 97.28 mg/L (6.4 mg/g DW) of the compound 54.
To overcome the mass transfer problems associated with the submerged type of bioreactors gas phase bioreactors were developed by the authors for A. indica hairy root cultivation. The nutrients were made available by dispensing the liquid either in spray or mist form. Not only the reduction in the boundary layer thickness and hyperhydricity but the higher solubility of oxygen in air than aqueous medium also played a positive role. Of these, the nutrient mist design promoted the highest growth and yielded 2.8 mg/g DW azadirachtin (27.4 mg/L), which translated into a volumetric productivity of 1.09 mg/(L d). Owing to the smaller droplet size, this configuration of generating mist caused less liquid entrapment than in nutrient spray system. Furthermore, the mist could easily percolate to the inaccessible areas such as the root center 60.
4. Antifeedant activity of cultured extracts
Different groups have reported the biopesticidal activity of the extracts from cultured calli and hairy roots of A. indica. The effect of cell suspension in vitro callus extracts and micropropagated plants has been reported against the desert locust by Allan and co‐workers 35. Rafiq et al. 61 recently studied the efficacy of the suspension and callus extracts of AZRL with a 100% mortality rate against jassids (Amrascabiguttula Ishida), thrips (Thripstabaci), and whiteflies (Bemisiatabaci (Gennadius)) using a dilution of 1:10 and 1:100 v/v extract in distilled water. A promising effect of these suspension and callus cultures have also been reported against Pectinophora gossypiella, Helicoverpa armigera, and Spodoptera litura 61 These researches earlier demonstrated a significant reduction in the feeding rate of lepidopteron insects 62.
Satdive et al. 41 observed the hairy roots extracts (containing 0.0016% DW, total azadirachtin mixture) to have superior antifeedant activity as opposed to leaves against the S. litura larvae. The dilutions, 1:1 and 1:5, of the hairy root extracts showed 100% antifeedency. On the other hand, a much lower activity of 90 and 86%, respectively, was obtained for the same dilution ratios of the leaf extract. Srivastava and Srivastava 59 by independent experiments with hairy root powder (containing 5.2 mg/g DW azadirachtin) and its solvent extract demonstrated a high antifeedant index against desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. While the hairy root powder in ethanol showed an antifeedant index of 97% the value for crude extract obtained from the roots was at 83.5%, both lower than the standard azadirachtin solution (35%) obtained from Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
5. Patents and potent research areas
As per the SCOPUS database, there are about 139 patents for the key word azadirachtin. First was an European patent (EP 0605139, also published as: CA2111630A1, CN1092106A, EP0605139A2, US5698423) on azadirachtin biosynthesis in cell suspension culture (source: SCOPOUS and Google Patents) 63. This invention discussed the method of azadirachtin synthesis from A. indica callus via A. tumefaciens and eventually developing liquid cell culture such that azadirachtin is produced in sufficient amounts therein, followed by recovery of the compound. Another patent discussed the production of peroxidases using A. indica suspensions wherein an extraordinary enzymatic activity was recorded (US 7,390,641 B2, EP 1758992 A2) 64. The peroxidase enzyme was extracted only from certain plant parts mainly from the roots. This invention particularly dealt with the development of compact callus cultures and enzyme recovery via novel methods resulting in minimum loss of the enzyme activity. Another aspect of the patent was development of optimized hormone combination along with undefined supplement (coconut water) for optimized callus growth and higher enzyme activity. The cost of production was much lower as compared to the commercially available counterparts. As per the authors, a rough cost of enzyme from the plants was around $2 per 2 lakh units of the enzyme whereas it was $450 for the same amount commercially. Although callus induction was achieved the patent does not directly deal with azadirachtin production. With regard to mass scale propagation, there is a single Indian patent dealing with azadirachtin biosynthesis from hairy root culture (Application No: 148/Del/2010) 65 in tailor‐made mist bioreactor. Only patents relevant to tissue culture are discussed here.
Inspite of several phytochemical and pharmacological studies carried out limited information is available regarding the biosynthetic pathway and related genes involved. Bhambhani et al. 66 recently cloned and characterized the genes, AiHMGR1 and AiHMGR2, which encode for 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methyl‐glutaryl coenzyme A reductase responsible for catalyzing the rate limiting step in the isoprenoid biosynthesis. Of the two genes, AiHMGR2, showed a direct correlation with azadirachtin biosynthesis in the fruit tissue. No correlation was observed between the AiHMGR1 expression and accumulation of bioactive molecules. More such studies and eventually use of these explants as a source of callus/hairy root induction would serve as a wealthy source of the compound, thereby, making the process more viable.
6. Concluding remarks
A better understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms controlling the metabolic pathways with genetic manipulations and engineered hairy roots/calli harboring desirable foreign gene sequences could lead to competitive bioactive compound yields 67. Moreover, whole plants can be regenerated from these tailored cultures. The other obstacle requiring thorough research is the photosensitivity of azadirachtin especially Azadirachtin A. For it to be effective over a longer period of time several UV absorbers have been tested, which either capture the UV rays or prevent the photoexcitation of this biopesticide 20. Level of persistence of azadirachtin in food products is not yet clear. As is evident from mass cultivation studies, the suitability of different bioreactors and scale up remains to be addressed in detail for mass scale production to cater to the market requirement.
Practical application
The review summarizes the progress made in the application of tissue culture techniques for biosynthesis of azadirachtin especially the mass production in different bioreactor scales and configurations. The aspect of mathematical modeling for growth and biosynthesis has been highlighted. Recent research and patents in this area have been discussed. The review is of particular importance for scientists, researchers, and/or students working in the area of bioreactor scale in vitro cultivation of A. indica and overproduction of azadirachtin. The different strategies discussed could serve as a guide for a wide range of tissue/organ cultures.
7 References
- 1. Biswas, K. , Chattopadhyay, I. , Banerjee, R. K. , Bandhopadyay, U. , Biological activity and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica). Curr. Sci. 2002, 82, 1336–1345. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Haque, E. , Mandal, I. , Pal, S. , Baral, R. , Prophylactic dose of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf preparation restricting murine tumor growth is nontoxic, hematostimulatory and immunostimulatory. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2006, 28, 33–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Veitch, G. E. , Boyer, A. , Ley, S. V. , The azadirachtin story. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9402–9429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Barceloux D. (Ed.), Medical Toxicology of Natural Substances: Foods, Fungi, Medicinal Herbs, Plants, and Venomous Animals, Wiley‐VCH, Weinheim: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rodrigues, M. , Festucci‐buselli, R. A. , Silva, L. C. , Azadirachtin biosynthesis induction in Azadirachta indica A. Juss cotyledonary calli with elicitor agents. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2014, 57, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Debashri, M. , Tamal, M. A. , Review on efficacy of Azadirachta indica A . Juss based biopesticides: An Indian perspective. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2012, 1, 94–99. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dai, J. , Yaylayan, V. A. , Raghavan, G. S. V. , Pare, J. R. , Multivariate calibration for the determination of total azadirachtin‐related limonoids and simple terpenoids in neem extracts using vanillin assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1169–1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Neves, B. P. , Oliveira, I. P. , Nogueira, J. C. M. , Cultivoe utilização do nim indiano (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). Goiânia: EMBRAPA‐CNPAF‐APA (Circular Técnica) 2003, 62, 1–31. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rodrigues, M. , Costa, T. H. F. , Festucci‐Buselli, R. A. , Silva, L. C. et al., Effects of flask sealing and growth regulators on in vitro propagation of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2012, 48, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kusari, S. , Verma, V. C. , Lamshoeft, M. , Spiteller, M. , An endophytic fungus from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. that produces azadirachtin. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1287–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Anuradha, A. , Annadurai, R. S. , Biochemical and molecular evidence of azadirachtin binding to insect actins. Curr. Sci. 2008, 95, 1588–1593. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jones, P. S. Ley, S. V. , Morgan, E. D. Stantafianos, D. , The chemistry of the neem tree. Focus on phytochemical pesticides, in: Jacbson M. (Ed.), The Neem Tree, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 1988, vol. 1, pp. 19–46. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Copping, L. G. , Menn, J. J. , Biopesticides: A review of their action, application and efficacy. Pest Manag. Sci. 2000, 56, 651–676. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rout, G. R. , In vitro somatic embryogenesis in callus cultures of Azadirachta indica A. Juss.—A multipurpose tree. J. For. Res. 2005, 10, 263–267. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Srivastava, P. , Chaturvedi, R. , Increased production of azadirachtin from an improved method of androgenic cultures of a medicinal tree Azadirachta indica A. Juss . Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 974–981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Singh, M. , Chaturvedi, R. , Sustainable production of azadirachtin from differentiated in vitro cell lines of neem (Azadirachta indica). AoB Plants 2013, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gamene, C. S. , Kraak, H. L. , Van Piljen, J. G. , de Vos, C. H. R. , Storage behaviour of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) seeds from Burkina Faso. Seed Sci. Technol. 1996, 24, 441–448. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Prakash, G. , Bhojwani, S. S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Production of azadirachtin from plant tissue culture: State of the art and future prospects. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2002, 7, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kota, S. , Rao, N. D. R. , Chary, P. , In vitro response of select regions of Azadirachta indica A . Juss ( Meliaceae ) as elucidated by biochemical and molecular variations. Curr. Sci. 2006, 91, 770–776. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bajwa, A. , Ahmad, A. , Potential applications of neem based products as biopesticides. Health 2012, 3, 116–120. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Veitch, G. E. , Beckmann, E. , Burke, B. J. , Boyer, A. et al., Synthesis of azadirachtin: A long but successful journey. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Morgan, E. , Thornton, M. , Azadirachtin in the fruit of Melia azedarach . Phytochemistry 1973, 12, 391–392. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kumar, V. S. , Navaratnam, V. , Neem (Azadirachta indica): Prehistory to contemporary medicinal uses to humankind. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2013, 3, 505–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tiwari, R. , Verma, A. K. , Chakraborty, S. , Dharma, K. et al., Neem (Azadirachta indica) and its potential for safeguarding health of animals and humans: A review. J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 14, 110–123. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mordue (Luntz), A. J. , Morgan, E. D. , Nisbet, A. J. , Azadirachtin, a natural product in insect control, in: Gilbert L. I., Iatrou K., Gill S. S. (Eds.), Comprehensive Molecular Science, Elsevier, Oxford, UK: 2005, pp. 117–135. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Salehzadeh, A. , Jabbar, A. , Jennens, L. , Ley, S. et al., The effects of phytochemical pesticides on the growth of cultured invertebrate and vertebrate cells. Pest Manag. Sci. 2002, 58, 268–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Huang, J.‐F. , Shui, K.‐J. , Li, H.‐Y. , Hu, M.‐Y. et al., Antiproliferative effect of azadirachtin A on Spodoptera litura Sl‐1 cell line through cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by up‐regulation of p53. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2011, 99, 16–24. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Huang, C. , Qian, Z.‐G. , Zhong, J.‐J. , Enhancement of ginsenoside biosynthesis in cell cultures of Panax ginseng by N,N’‐dicyclohexylcarbodiimide elicitation. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 165, 30–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Huang, J. , Lv, C. , Hu, M. , Zhong, G. , The mitochondria‐mediate apoptosis of Lepidopteran cells induced by azadirachtin. PLoS One 2014, 8, 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Robertson, S. L. , Ni, W. , Dhadialla, T. S. , Nisbet, A. J. et al., Identification of a putative azadirachtin‐binding complex from Drosophila Kc167 cells. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2007, 64, 200–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lynn, O. M. , Kim, J. E. , Lee, K. Y. , Effect of azadirachtin on development and gene expression of fifth instar larvae of Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella . J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2012, 15, 101–105. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Parida, M. M. , Upadhyay, C. , Pandya, G. J. , Ana, A. , Inhibitory potential of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) leaves on Dengue virus type‐2 replication. J. Ethnophamacol. 2002, 79, 273–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kumar, S1. , Raman, R. P. , Kumar, K. , Pandey P. K., Kumar, N. , Mallesh, B. , Mohanty, S. , Kumar, A. , Effect of azadirachtin on haematological and biochemical parameters of Argulus‐infested goldfish Carassius auratus (Linn. 1758). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 39, 733–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Quraishi, A. , Koche, V. , Sharma, P. , Mishra, S. , In vitro clonal propagation of neem (Azadirachta indica). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 78, 281–284. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kearney, M. L. , Allan, E. J. , Hooker, J. E. , Mordue (Luntz), A. , Antifeedant effects of in vitro culture extracts of the neem tree, Azadirachta indica against the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål)). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1994, 37, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Nair, G. M. , Narasimah, S. , Babu, V. S. , Bioproduction of azadirachtin‐A, nimbin and salannin in callus and cell suspension cultures of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). Curr. Sci. 2006, 91, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Prakash, G. , Emmannuel, C. J. S. K. , Srivastava, A. K. , Variability of azadirachtin in Azadirachta indica (neem) and batch kinetics studies of cell suspension culture. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2005, 10, 198–204. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Indulekha, P. , Sariga, P. , In vitro callogenesis and rhizogenesis in Azadirachta indica A. Juss . Int. J. Plant Anim. Environ. Sci. 2016, 6, 135–139. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Spieth, P. , Lohse, R. , Bednarz, H. , Kleeberg, K. et al., Alternative strategies to by‐pass the plant‐based Azadirachtin‐A production, in: 6th International Symposium Breeding Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (BREEDMAP 6), Germany, 2016, pp. 29–32. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Naina, N. S. , Gupta, P. K. , Mascarenhas, A. F. , Genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic neem (Azadirachta indica) plants using Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Curr. Sci. 1989, 58, 184–187. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Satdive, R. K. , Fulzele, D. P. , Eapen, S. , Enhanced production of azadirachtin by hairy root cultures of Azadirachta indica A. Juss by elicitation and media optimization. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128, 281–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Raval, K. N. , Hellwig, S. , Prakash, G. , Ramos‐Plasencia, A. et al., Necessity of a two‐stage process for the production of azadirachtin‐related limonoids in suspension cultures of Azadirachta indica . J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2003, 96, 16–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Prakash, G. , Srivastava, A. K. , Statistical media optimization for cell growth and azadirachtin production in Azadirachta indica (A. Juss) suspension cultures. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 3795–3800. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Sujanya, S. , Devi, B. P. , Sai, I. , In vitro production of azadirachtin from cell suspension cultures of Azadirachta indica . J. Biosci. 2008, 33,113–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chandra, S. , Chandra, R. , Engineering secondary metabolite production in hairy roots. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 371–395. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Devi, B. P. , Vimala, A. , Sai, I. , Chandra, S. , Effect of cyanobacterial elicitor on neem cell suspension cultures. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2008, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Prakash, G. , Srivastava, A. K. , Statistical elicitor optimization studies for the enhancement of azadirachtin production in bioreactor Azadirachta indica cell cultivation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 40, 218–226. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Prakash, G. , Srivastava, A. K. , Integrated yield and productivity enhancement strategy for biotechnological production of Azadirachtin by suspension culture of Azadirachta indica. Asia‐Pac . J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 6, 129–137. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kuruvilla, T. , Komaraiah, P. , Ramakrishna, S. V. , Enhanced secretion of azadirachtin by permeabilized margosa (Azadirachta indica) cells. J. Exp. Bot 1999, 37, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Prakash, G. , Srivastava, A. K. , Azadirachtin production in stirred tank reactors by Azadirachta indica suspension culture. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Prakash, G. , Srivastava, A. K. , Modeling of azadirachtin production by Azadirachta indica and its use for feed forward optimization studies. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 29, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Prakash, G. , Srivastava, A. K. , Production of biopesticides in an in situ cell retention bioreactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008, 151, 307–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Srivastava, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Statistical medium optimization for enhanced azadirachtin production in hairy root culture of Azadirachta indica . In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 48, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Srivastava, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Azadirachtin production by hairy root cultivation of Azadirachta indica in a modified stirred tank reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 35, 1549–1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Srivastava, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Effect of elicitors and precursors on azadirachtin production in hairy root culture of Azadirachta indica . Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 2286–2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Srivastava, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Strategies to overcome oxygen transfer limitations during hairy root cultivation of Azadiracta indica for enhanced azadirachtin production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 1818–1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Srivastava, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Palavalli, R. R. , Development of a mathematical model for growth and oxygen transfer in in vitro plant hairy root cultivations. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 1831–1844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Steingroewer, J. , Bley, T. , Georgiev, V. , Ivanov, I. et al., Bioprocessing of differentiated plant in vitro systems. Eng. Life Sci. 2013, 13, 26–38. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Srivastava, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Production of the biopesticide azadirachtin by hairy root cultivation of Azadirachta indica in liquid‐phase bioreactors. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 171, 1351–1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Srivastava, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , In Vitro azadirachtin production by hairy root cultivation of Azadirachta indica in nutrient mist bioreactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 166, 365–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Rafiq, M. , Dahot, M. U. , Naqvi, S. H. A. , Ali, N. , Limnoids from callus and cell suspension biomass. Pak. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 10, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Rafiq, M. , Dahot, M. U. , Naqvi, S. H. , Mali, M. et al., Efficacy of Neem callus and cells suspension extracts against three lepidopteron insects of cotton. J. Med. Plant Res. 2012, 6, 5344–5349. [Google Scholar]
- 63. Holowach‐Keller, L. P. , Birman, I. , Patterson, D. R. , A method for producing azadirachtin. European Patent 0605139, 1995.
- 64. Abraham, T. E. , Devaki, N. R. , Kuruvilla, T. , Joseph, J. , Production of peroxidase from plant cell and callus culture. US Patent 7,390,641 B2, 2008.
- 65. Srivastava, A. K. , Bisaria, V. S. , Srivastava, S. , Bioreactor and uses thereof (Development of suitable bioreactor system for azadirachtin production by hairy roots of Azadirachta indica. Indian Patent 4689, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Bhambhani, S. , Lakhwani, D. , Shukla, T. , Pandey, A. et al., Genes encoding members of 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGR) gene family from Azadirachta indica and correlation with azadirachtin biosynthesis. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017, 39, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Lim, E.‐K. , Bowles, D. , Plant production systems for bioactive small molecules. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 271–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
