Abstract
While hydrogen polysulfides (H2Sn, n≥2) are believed to play regulatory roles in biology, their fundamental chemistry and reactivity are still poorly understood. Compounds that can produce H2Sn are useful tools. In this work we found that H2S2 could be effectively produced from diacyl disulfide precursors, triggered by certain nucleophiles, in both aqueous solutions and organic solvents. This method was used to explore redox reactions of H2S2, such as scavenging 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) and reduction of tetrazines.
Keywords: Hydrogen Sulfide, Hydrogen Persulfide, Donor
Graphical Abstract
To create your abstract, type over the instructions in the template box below.
Fonts or abstract dimensions should not be changed or altered.

Reactive sulfur species (RSS) are a group of sulfur-containing molecules that play regulatory roles in biological systems. Among all RSS, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is most well studied.1–5 In the past decade, H2S has been identified as an important gasotransmitter along with nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO). Very recently hydrogen polysulfides (H2Sn, n≥2) have received increased attention as H2Sn are also believed to have regulatory functions and are linked to H2S signaling. Endogenous H2Sn are proposed to be produced enzymatically by 3-mercaptopyruvate transferase (3-MST)6 and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases (CARS).7 H2Sn can also be generated from H2S via the H2S-NO cross talk and haem protein-catalyzed oxidation.8–11 Recent studies suggested some biological activities that are originally attributed to H2S may be actually mediated by H2Sn. For example, H2Sn were found to be hundreds of times more potent at activating transient receptor potential A1 channels than H2S.12 H2Sn are also very effective in inducing S-sulfhydration in Keap1, the key regulating protein in Nrf2 signaling.13 It is likely that H2S and H2Sn work collectively to maintain sulfur redox balance.
To further understand the function and biological roles of H2Sn, compounds that deliver H2Sn are needed. In current studies, researchers often use commercially available inorganic salts (such as Na2S2) as H2Sn equivalents. These salts release H2Sn uncontrollably in solutions. Additionally, the preparation of these salts involves treating sodium with stoichiometric amounts S8 under high temperature. Impurities such as Na2S and S8 seems inevitable,14 making it hard to attribute the observed bioactivities solely to H2Sn. As such, methods or compounds that can controllably produce H2Sn are highly desirable. However, this area remains underdeveloped and only a few such examples have been reported. For example, the O to S relay deprotection based donors developed by our lab could release H2S2 under acid or F- activation (Scheme 1a).15 Wang et al. reported BW-HP donors that were triggered by esterase or phosphatase to produce H2S2 (Scheme 1b).16 It should be noted that BW-HP donors are based on the acyl disulfide template. Acyl disulfides are highly reactive species, they can form persulfides and release H2S upon thiol activation.17 It is also known that acyl disulfides are highly reactive toward amines to form amides (Scheme 1c).18 It is expectable that H2S2 is released as a byproduct in the process while this has not been characterized. We envisioned the reaction between diacyl disulfides and certain nucleophiles like amines could produce H2S2 in a clean and controlled way. This would allow chemistry investigation of H2S2 under certain conditions. In this work, we studied the generation of H2S2 in this system and evaluated the reactivity of H2S2 in organic solutions.
Scheme 1.
Possible ways for H2S2 generation
In our studies three diacyl disulfides (2a-c, Scheme 2) were prepared by oxidizing the corresponding thioacids with iodine. With these compounds in hand we first tested their stability. 2a-c were fairly stable when stored as neat materials at 4 °C. No obvious decomposition was observed after 3 weeks. In organic solvents such as DCM and THF, they were found to be stable for days at room temperature. However, when dissolved in buffers, slow but noticeable decomposition was observed. This could be due to hydrolysis of diacyl disulfides in aqueous solutions. One possible pathway is simultaneous hydrolysis of both acyl groups on diacyl disulfides, forming H2S2 as the product (Figure 1–a). It is also possible that one acyl group gets hydrolyzed first to form an acylated persulfide intermediate (Figure 1–b). This intermediate further degrades to form other sulfur species. To determine these two possibilities, we incubated diacyl disulfides in PBS buffer and used three specific fluorescent probes to identify the sulfur species formed in hydrolysis. As shown in Figure 1–c, although diacyl disulfides showed some degree of fluorescence turn-on with DSP-319 (a H2S2 probe) and WSP-520 (a H2S probe), the most prominent fluorescence enhancement came from SSP-421 (a sulfane sulfur probe). These results suggested sulfane sulfur was the major end product generated from hydrolysis of diacy disulfides. The formation of sulfane sulfur could be attributed to the either the decomposition of the acylated persulfide intermediate or H2S2. Interestingly, NMR study (Figure S1) showed both acetic acid and thioacetic acid were formed from 2a. Based on these observations, we feel both pathway a) and b) were possible. The decomposition of the acyl persulfide intermediate should provide thioacetic acid, S8 (a sulfane sulfur), and H2S while the detailed mechanism is still unclear. Disproportionation or radical reaction could be involved. It is also noted that the more sterically hindered substrate 2c did not undergo hydrolysis as all those fluorescent probes did not give significant signals.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis and structures of diacyl disulfides
Figure 1.
a) and b) Possible hydrolysis pathways of diacyl disulfides. c) Decomposition of diacyl disulfides monitored by fluorescent probes. 2a-c (50 μM) were incubated with WSP-5, SSP-4, DSP-3 (10 μM) in PBS (pH 7.4, 50 mM, with CTAB 25 μM).
Next we turned to test if diacyl disulfides could release H2S2 under amine activation in organic solutions. 2a was treated with different amines (3a-e) in THF (Figure 2). H2S2 generation was monitored by an H2Sn specific fluorescent probe DSP-3. As expected, time-dependent fluorescence increases were observed when 2a was treated with 3a-d, indicating H2S2 was indeed produced. In theory, diacyl disulfides should release H2S2 only when both acyl groups were removed simultaneously. We expected that diamines would facilitate the reaction and make H2S2 release faster. However, little difference in the rates of H2S2 formation from 3a-c was observed (Figure 2–b). Presumably the reactions of all unhindered primary amines were equally fast. We did observe slower H2S2 formation with a secondary amine 3d and almost no H2S2 formation with aniline 3e. These suggest varied nucleophilicity of amines could tune H2S2 release profiles from acyl disulfides. On the other hand, when 3a was treated with different diacyl disulfides (2a-c) substitution effects were obvious (Figure 2–c) as more sterically hindered substrates gave slower H2S2 release. These results suggest the rates of H2S2 production from diacyl disulfides can be controlled. Additionally, 2a and 3a can generate H2S2 in a variety of organic solvents with different rates (Figure S2). Generally, polar aprotic solvents could promote H2S2 production. For consistency, we use THF as the solvent for following reactions of 2a and 3a to generate H2S2.
Figure 2.
a) Structures of amines used in reactions with acyl disulfides. b) Time-dependent H2S2 release from 2a (5 mM) when treated with amines 3a, 3b (5 mM), 3c - 3e (10 mM) in THF and monitored by DSP-3. c) Time-dependent H2S2 release from 2a - 2c when treated with 3a and monitored by DSP-3.
To further confirm H2S2 release from diacyl disulfides, we used a model compound 4 to trap H2S2. 4 should react with H2S2 via an aromatic nucleophilic substitution followed by an intramolecular cyclization to form 5 (Scheme 3).19 In this experiment 2a and 3a were mixed in THF in the presence of 4 for 1 h. As expected, the desired product 5 was isolated in 25% yield. The low yield however, may suggest the formation of other RSS in addition to H2S2, such as persulfide RSSH, or the instability of H2S2. Compound 4 could also react with the RSSH intermediate generated from 2a and 3a to form the corresponding disulfide adduct. Monobormobimane (MBB), which has been used in capturing and charactering biologically generated H2S2,22 was used in our studies. The corresponding disulfide adduct 6 was obtained in 19% yield. It should be noted in this experiment, the tri- and mono-sulfide adducts of MBB were also identified by mass spectroscopy. Additionally, elemental sulfur was detected in both reactions. While the formation of 5 and 6 clearly indicates the generation of H2S2, the formation of other byproducts also suggests H2S2 may disproportionate into other RSS and its decomposition seems to be unavoidable.
Scheme 3.
Capturing H2S2 generated from 2a and 3a.
Having demonstrated diacyl disulfides’ capability of generating H2S2 in organic solvents, we wondered if they could release H2S2 when interacting with cells. Cell-imaging experiments were then conducted. PC3 cells were first loaded with DSP-3 and then treated with 2a. As shown in Figure 3–b, a significant fluorescence enhancement was observed. However, when cells were pre-treated with a thiol-blocking reagent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), the fluorescence enhancement was attenuated (Figure 3–c). Interestingly, when NEM-treated cells were subsequently treated with lysine and 2a, fluorescent enhancement resumed (Figure 3–d). Similar results were obtained when 2a was applied to HeLa cells (Figure S4). These results suggest under physiological conditions, 2a was mainly activated by cellular nucleophiles such as cysteine and GSH. This process should outweigh its hydrolysis as the hydrolysis is much slower. Of note, it is known that NEM can react with amines23, 24 and we found lysine could reactivate 2a in NEM-treated cells. These results suggested that cellular amines could also activate 2a. Previous study showed diacyl disulfides were able to produce H2S when reacting with thiols.17 Therefore, it is likely that 2a produced both H2S and H2S2 in cells. Overall, these results indicate diacyl disulfides are activate species vulnerable to cellular nucleophiles and can release more than one RSS under physiological conditions. Caution should be taken if diacyl disulfides are used to study the bioactivity of a single RSS.
Figure 3.
Fluorescence imaging of 2a in PC3 cells. Cells were incubated with DSP3 (10 μM) for 20 min, then washed and subjected to different treatments. a) control (No 2a added); b) 100 μM 2a for 30 min; c) 500 μM NEM for 20 min, then 100 μM 2a for 30 min. d) 500 μM NEM 20 min; 200 μM Lys 30 min; 100 μM 2a for 30 min. e) Mean fluorescence intensities of images a)-d).
We then utilized diacyl disulfides to study the properties of H2S2. Although H2S2 is of higher oxidation state than H2S, it is also reported to be a stronger reductant.25,26 We used DPPH assay to verify the reducing ability of H2S2. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) is a stable radical which has a strong purple color. In the presence of species that can donate one electron, DPPH can be reduced and decolored. This process can be monitored by UV spectrometry.27 In our studies, we compared in-situ generated H2S2 with H2S and cysteine (Figure 4). It should be noted that we tried to directly use Na2S and Na2S2 in this study. However, no DPPH reduction was noted with these inorganic salts, presumably due to low solubility of these salts in ethanol. While 2a and 3a showed no DPPH reduction alone, a pre-mixed solution of 2a and 3a reduced 40% DPPH in 7 min. On the other hand, about 20% DPPH was reduced by cysteine. We also used compounds 7 and 8, which could release H2S and H2S2 respectively in the presence of fluoride.15 H2S2 generated from 8 reduced about 30% of DPPH, While H2S generated from 7 also reacted with DPPH quickly, it only scavenged about 15% of DPPH, presumably due to one less reactive sulfur atom in the molecule. In these experiments 20 μM analyte was first prepared and then added to an ethanol solution containing 100 μM DPPH. It is known that persulfides are more reactive toward radicals compared to H2S and thiols.26 Based on the similarity of H2S2 and persulfides, they should have similar redox reactivity. Therefore, it is not surprising that H2S2 generated from 2a and 3a showed better DPPH reducing ability than H2S and cysteine. It should be noted that H2S2 may decompose to form H2S and sulfane sulfur, which may also reduce DPPH. However, the observed DPPH reduction should mainly come from H2S2 due to short reaction time.
Figure 4.
a) Reduction of DPPH. b) Generation of H2S and H2S2 by 7 and 8. c) DPPH scavenging of various RSS. 100 μM DPPH was mixed with 20 μM RSS, UV absorption at 517 nm was measured.
Tetrazines are often used to perform ‘click’ reactions with trans-cyclooctenes.28,29 A recent report found that H2S could reduce tetrazines to dihydrotetrazines.30 Based on the results of DPPH experiments, we speculated H2Sn could reduce tetrazine, likely more effectively than H2S. To test this hypothesis, tetrazine 9, which has a characteristic purple color and UV absorption at 500~550 nm, was used as the model substrate. Upon reduction by H2S or H2Sn, 9 would be converted to 10 with the disappearance of UV absorption. This allowed us to monitor the progress of the reduction. We first used Na2S and Na2S2 as the equivalents of H2S and H2S2. To ensure the solubility of both 9 and Na2S/Na2S2, these experiments were performed in a mixed solvent (20% H2O, 80% THF). As shown in Figure 5–b, Na2S2 (25 mM) was able to reduce 90% of 9 (5 mM) in about 10 min. Although Na2S also showed ability to reduce 9, the process was much slower (~30% after 50 min). Next, we tested if in-situ generated H2S2 could reduce 9. To this end, 2a and 3a were incubated for 30 min and treated with 9. Since 2a, 3a and 9 were all soluble in organic solvents, these experiments were done in THF. As shown in Figure 5–c/d, a dose-dependent decrease of UV absorption at 548 nm was detected, indicating the reduction of 9, whereas 2a and 3a alone could not reduce 9. Interestingly, in-situ generated H2S by 7 and TBAF could not reduce 9 under this condition. These results suggest that H2S2 is much more potent than H2S in reducing tetrazines. This finding may be used to develop tetrazine-based H2Sn sensors.
Figure 5.
a) Reduction of tetrazine. b) Time-dependent reduction of 9 (5 mM) by Na2S or Na2S2 (25 mM) in THF w/ 20% water. c) Dose-dependent reduction of 9 (1 mM) by H2S2 generated from 2a and 3a in THF. d) Reduction of 9 (1 mM) by various species (4 mM) in THF.
In summary, we demonstrated here that diacyl disulfides could be used as precursors to produce H2S2 in both aqueous buffers and organic solvents. H2S2 generated by this method could potently reduce DPPH and tetrazines. These results will aid future understanding of H2Sn.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (R01GM125968).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Szabó C Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wallace JL; Wang R Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang R Physio. Rev 2012, 92, 791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li L; Rose P; Moore PK Annu. Rev. Pharmacol 2011, 51, 169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.WANG R FASEB J. 2002, 16, 1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kimura H Proc. Jpn. Acad. B-Phys 2015, 91, 131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Akaike T; Ida T; Wei; Nishida M; Kumagai Y; Alam MM; Ihara H; Sawa T; Matsunaga T; Kasamatsu S; Nishimura A; Morita M; Tomizawa K; Nishimura A; Watanabe S; Inaba K; Shima H; Tanuma N; Jung M; Fujii S; Watanabe Y; Ohmuraya M; Nagy P; Feelisch M; Fukuto JM; Motohashi H Nat. Comm. 2017, 8, 1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu H; Radford MN; Yang C-T; Chen W; Xian M Br. J. Pharmaco 2019, 176, 616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cortese-Krott MM; Kuhnle GGC; Dyson A; Fernandez BO; Grman M; DuMond JF; Barrow MP; McLeod G; Nakagawa H; Ondrias K; Nagy P; King SB; Saavedra JE; Keefer LK; Kelm M; Butler AR; Feelisch M Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015, 112, 4651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miyamoto R; Koike S; Takano Y; Shibuya N; Kimura Y; Hanaoka K; Urano Y; Ogasawara Y; Kimura H Sci. Rep 2017, 7, 45995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Olson KR; Gao Y; Arif F; Arora K; Patel S; DeLeon ER; Sutton TR; Feelisch M; Cortese-Krott MM; Straub KD Redox Biol. 2018, 15, 74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kimura Y; Mikami Y; Osumi K; Tsugane M; Oka J.-i.; Kimura H FASEB J. 2013, 27, 2451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koike S; Ogasawara Y; Shibuya N; Kimura H; Ishii K FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 3548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brown A; Battles J Synth. React. Inorg. Met-Org. Chem 1984, 14, 945. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kang J; Xu S; Radford MN; Zhang W; Kelly SS; Day JJ; Xian M Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 5893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yu B; Zheng Y; Yuan Z; Li S; Zhu H; De La Cruz LK; Zhang J; Ji K; Wang S; Wang B J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roger T; Raynaud F; Bouillaud F; Ransy C; Simonet S; Crespo C; Bourguignon M-P; Villeneuve N; Vilaine J-P; Artaud I; Galardon E ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 2268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mali SM; Gopi HN J. Org. Chem 2014, 79, 2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu C; Chen W; Shi W; Peng B; Zhao Y; Ma H; Xian M J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 7257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peng B; Chen W; Liu C; Rosser EW; Pacheco A; Aguilar HC; Xian M Chem. Eur. J 2014, 20, 1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bibli S-I; Luck B; Zukunft S; Wittig J; Chen W; Xian M; Papapetropoulos A; Hu J; Fleming I; Redox Biol. 2018, 18, 295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kimura Y; Koike S; Shibuya N; Lefer D; Ogasawara Y; Kimura H Sci. Rep 2017, 7, 10459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Riggs A J. Biol. Chem 1961, 236, 6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smyth DG; Nagamatsu A; Fruton JS J. Am. Chem. Soc 1960, 82, 4600. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ida T; Sawa T; Ihara H; Tsuchiya Y; Watanabe Y; Kumagai Y; Suematsu M; Motohashi H; Fujii S; Matsunaga T; Yamamoto M; Ono K; Devarie-Baez NO; Xian M; Fukuto JM; Akaike T Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014, 111, 7606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Filipovic MR; Zivanovic J; Alvarez B; Banerjee R Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Blois MS Nature 1958, 181, 1199. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blackman ML; Royzen M; Fox JM; J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 13518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Steiger AK; Yang Y; Royzen M; Pluth MD Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhao Z; Cao L; Zhang T; Hu R; Wang S; Li S; Li Y; Yang G ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 2581. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








