Abstract
Bioremediation is a process wherein the decontamination strategies are designed so that a site could achieve the environmental abiotic and biotic parameters close to its baseline. In the process, the driving force is the available microbial genetic degradative capabilities, which are supported by required nutrients so that the desired expression of these capabilities could be exploited in favour of removal of pollutants. With genomics tools not only the available abilities could be estimated but their dynamic performance could also be established. These tools are now playing important role in bioprocess optimization, which not only derive the bio-stimulation plans but also could suggest possible genetic bio-augmentation options.
Keywords: Bioremediation, Bio-augmentation, Bio-stimulation, Bioprocess, Metagenomics
Introduction
Ecosystem services irrespective of environmental matrix are driven and decided by the key nutrient balancing modules of the biogeochemical cycles [1, 2]. This scenario gets affected by nutrient shocks due to anthropogenic activities, which in most cases could be considered as pollutants [3, 4]. Under this stressed environment with additional organic carbon as nutrients, the dynamics of community shifts and depending upon the organic loading the enrichment process starts. It creates new composition of microbial community; and the analysis of such communities in the last decades has seen paradigm shifts due to computational tools with capacity to not only generate large amount of quality data but can also efficiently process these data (Fig. 1) [5–14].
Fig. 1.
The dynamics of bacterial community metabolic shifts
Biodegradation and Bioremediation Approaches
In carbon (C) limiting environmental conditions, the bacteria use autotrophic mode of survival with capacity to utilize carbon dioxide as sole of C source [15]. However, the environmental matrix mostly provides the heterotrophic mode of survival for bacteria; and extension of this capacity for utilization of C sources entering due to anthropogenic activity in different ecosystems are considered as biodegradation. The introduction of such pollutants impacts the baseline of any ecosystem [16]. The overall process of bringing the baseline to almost its original state is considered as a process of bioremediation [17]. The bioremediation process undergoes different layers of microbial community turn over while removing the undesired organic C from the ecosystem [18, 19]. At the same time, the scale of operation in bioremediation demands segregation of different process elements and its optimization [20].
Microbes with Desired Catabolic Functions
One of the main components of any bioremediation process is the availability of microbes with desired catabolic functions. This involves the rigorous selection process where the environmental contaminated samples with target pollutants are used as initial inoculum; and through a designed enrichment process the desired microbes with catabolic potentials are selected [21–41]. However, depending upon the contamination and types of pollutants the process also leads to isolation of variety of microbes from same sample or some time even same enrichment system [42, 43]. The whole genome sequencing options provide the better understanding about the isolated strain, including its flexible multi substrate utilization capacities [44, 45].
Unfolding Bio-degradative Genetic Capacities
The genome sequencing approach has annotated the understanding of microbial capacities and allowed better exploitation of physiological capacities [45, 46]. For example, a bacterium having capacity to utilize naphthalene as C source, on complete genome annotation suggested the possible other aromatic ring degradation pathways with tolerance to different metal ions [47]. In silico genome annotation and analysis approach also helps in reducing the time required for analysis of physiological behaviour of typical isolate and utilizing its genetic information in developing tracking or sensing tools [48–52].
Complexities in Regulation of Desired Physiology
The bioprocess optimization is one of the most important steps in effective bioremediation, which could work in the presence or absence of oxygen [20]. Depending upon the organic loading and desired product, the design and operation of the bioreactor could be envisaged [53]. The second important criteria is that which type of bacteria, consortia or community is required with the bioreactor configuration and desired metabolic pathways [54–62]; and sometimes to achieve maximum output from the strains, a simulation laboratory experiments are designed which are critical for optimization of operational conditions. These can be applied at a pilot or full-scale level [63–66]. To enhance the desired expression of degradative phenotype the induction of metabolic pathways with required microbial density plays a key role; for example, typical levels of microbial density wherein the quorum sensing phenomenon induces the desired functions observed to be associated with optimum performance of bioreactors with granulation of microbial community [67–70].
Monitoring Bacteria in Environments
The efficiency of monitoring process depends on the assessment of abundance of functional genotypes, which can be affectively monitored by using polymerase chain reaction, a tool which targets the gene(s) in question [71–81]. However, with next generation sequencing (NGS) approach the microbial community tracking has changed completely; and with comparative details it provides temporal and spatial data [82, 83]. However, the efficiency of this analysis is decided by the choice of computational tool applied; or depending upon the analysis plan even the novel pipeline must be devised for better understanding of the system variables [84]. This issue is highly relevant in case of closely related genera or species, where further analysis of taxonomically relevant gene such as 16Sr RNA gene requires the case specific algorithm [85–92].
Metagenomics: Analysing Microbial Communities
Metagenomics involves the analysis of total DNA associated with any ecological sample [5]. The reliability of analysis is decided by the efficiency of extractions of total representative DNA of the sample [93–96]. The developed metagenome extraction techniques have been evaluated and applied with different samples [97–103]. There are different pipelines available for analysis of metagenomic data generated by NGS [104]; however, the microbial community structures are so complex that analysis must be driven by different possible hypothesis and their validation [105]. For example, by planning of novel sequence mining approach a unique class of enzymes can be targeted from the data generated from a bioreactor [106, 107], or even by analysing the metagenome data generated from the reactor an operational-conditions could be planned or revised [108, 109]. However, the challenges are there to understand the community colonization with highly persistent pollutants [110–112]. In addition to this, metagenomics approach can help in developing the valorisation projects such as utilization of agricultural residues [113–118].
Bio-augmentation and Bio-stimulation
The biological waste treatment systems are cost effective, but their efficiencies are directly proportional to performance of the microbial community associated with the specific system. Bio-augmentation is mostly carried out for balancing the nutrients, wherein a specific bacterial strain or consortium is introduced into the degradative system [119–121]. This essentially genetically bio-augments the required degradative capacity which also can be achieved using bacterial strain flexible with degradative capacity [122]. Bio-stimulation of microbial community can be achieved either by balancing the nutrients, if the required C:N (Nitrogen):P (Phosphorus) ratio in the ecosystem is not supporting the degradation kinetics [123–125], or some intermediates of pathways can be introduced in the system which can induce the expression of required genes [66, 67, 126]. The application of bio-stimulation and bio-augmentation is now a days applied extensively to different types contaminated ecosystem particularly associated with persistent organic pollutants [127–131]. To further enhance the effective strategy, the plant–microbe interactions are also being applied wherein balancing of nutrients with the network of designed rhizospheric population further creates the environment for effective degradation kinetics [132–136]. Another challenge in bioremediation is the sites with almost no nutrients such as rocky land, sand or arid ecosystems; and in such environments, the nutrient balancing with organic load of pollutants affects the bioremediation process. In such cases, the augmentation of bacteria which can bring out the C or N fixation, efficient utilization of pollutants with supplementation of P can favour the remediation measures [137–140].
Bioremediation Challenges and Future Perspective
The microbial community data generated through NGS tools and further analysed by computational analysis suggest that the diversity of most of the ecosystem is still not completely explored [5, 18, 44, 141]. Bioremediation approach to an extent is relatively uncontrolled enrichment process under the pressure of few identified contaminates [3, 17, 142]. Hence, initial assessment and diagnosis of system is crucial, which will guide the work plan for enrichment of desired microbes to address the detail work element the bio-stimulation or bio-augmentation process can be recruited to overall remedial approach [143, 144]. Based on that the possible biological interactions associated with remedial site could be envisaged. This matrix finally represents dynamics of multi species—multi substrate system [119, 145–147], and hence, amending the system with desired genotypes some time becomes mandatary [100, 122]. Second approach could be training the bacterial strains before releasing in the environment and understanding of its functional modules; and possible effects on the strain due to other microbial species, metabolites and/or inhibitors [20, 101, 148–158]. Once this is established the selected bioprocess can be designed and extended for field scale operation. However, the challenges will be always there if the site is also having metal ions as contaminants, which may require some innovative approaches [159–162]. The complexities in biological process requires redefining the thinking process where the environmental factors with dynamics of metabolite continuously not only defines the community structure but also their expression profiles [163, 164].
Acknowledgements
This research was supported a Grant from the Intelligent Synthetic Biology Center of Global Frontier Project (2013M3A6A8073184) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Republic of Korea (JKL). This research was supported by Brain Pool Grant (NRF-2019H1D3A2A01060226) by National Research Foundation of Korea to work at Konkuk University (VCK).
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Baltar F, Bayer B, Bednarsek N, Deppeler S, et al. Towards integrating evolution, metabolism, and climate change studies of marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lu M, Hedin LO. Global plant–symbiont organization and emergence of biogeochemical cycles resolved by evolution-based trait modelling. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:239. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0759-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siles JA, Margesin R. Insights into microbial communities mediating the bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil from an Alpine former military site. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:4409–4421. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8932-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luo X, Bing H, Luo Z, Wang Y, Jin L. Impacts of atmospheric particulate matter pollution on environmental biogeochemistry of trace metals in soil-plant system: a review. Environ Pollut. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kalia VC. Mining metagenomes for novel bioactive molecules, Ch 01. In: Kalia VC, Shouche Y, Purohit HJ, Rahi P, editors. Mining of microbial wealth and metagenomics. Singapore: Springer; 2017. pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kalia VC, Chauhan A, Bhattacharyya G. Genomic databases yield novel bioplastic producers. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:845–846. doi: 10.1038/nbt0803-845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kalia VC, Lal S, Ghai R, Mandal M, Chauhan A. Mining genomic databases to identify novel hydrogen producers. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21:152–156. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Porwal S, Lal S, Cheema S, Kalia VC. Phylogeny in aid of the present and novel microbial lineages: diversity in Bacillus. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bhushan A, Joshi J, Shankar P, Kushwah J, Raju SC, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Development of genomic tools for the identification of certain Pseudomonas up to species level. Indian J Microbiol. 2013;53:253–263. doi: 10.1007/s12088-013-0412-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koul S, Kumar P, Kalia VC. A unique genome wide approach to search novel markers for rapid identification of bacterial pathogens. J Mol Genet Med. 2015;9:194. doi: 10.4172/1747-0862.1000194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lal S, Raje DV, Cheema S, Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Investigating the phylogeny of hydrogen metabolism by comparative genomics: horizontal gene transfer. In: Kalia V, editor. Microbial factories. New Delhi: Springer; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Koul S, Kalia VC. Comparative genomics reveals biomarkers to identify Lactobacillus species. Indian J Microbiol. 2016;56:253–263. doi: 10.1007/s12088-016-0605-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kalia VC, Kumar R, Koul S. In silico analytical tools for phylogenetic and functional bacterial genomics, Ch 15. In: Arora G, Sajid A, Kalia VC, editors. Drug resistance in bacteria, fungi, malaria, and cancer. Basel: Springer; 2017. pp. 339–356. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kumar R, Koul S, Kalia VC. Exploiting bacterial genomes to develop biomarkers for identification, Ch 16. In: Arora G, Sajid A, Kalia VC, editors. Drug resistance in bacteria, fungi, malaria, and cancer. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 357–370. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Agarwal L, Purohit HJ. Genome sequence of Rhizobium lupini HPC(L) isolated from saline desert soil, Kutch (Gujarat) Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00071–122013. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00071-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Purohit HJ, Raje DV, Kapley A, Padmanabhan P, Singh RN. Genomics tools in environmental impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:356A–363A. doi: 10.1021/es032594m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Genomic tools in bioremediation. Indian J Microbiol. 2009;49:108–113. doi: 10.1007/s12088-009-0012-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Paliwal V, Puranik S, Purohit HJ. Integrated perspective for effective bioremediation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;166:903–924. doi: 10.1007/s12010-011-9479-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huang Y, Pan H, Wang Q, Ge Y, Liu W, Christie P. Enrichment of the soil microbial community in the bioremediation of a petroleum-contaminated soil amended with rice straw or sawdust. Chemosphere. 2019;224:265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khardenavis AA, Vaidya AN, Kalia VC, Purohit HJ. Recent advances in optimization of environmental bioprocesses. In: Purohit HJ, Kalia VC, Khardenavis AA, Vaidya AN, editors. Optimization and applicability of bioprocesses. Singapore: Springer; 2017. pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kalia VC. The dawn of the era of bioactive compounds, Ch 01. In: Kalia VC, Saini AK, editors. Metabolic engineering for bioactive compounds. Singapore: Springer; 2017. pp. 3–10. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kalia VC. Microbes: factories for bioproducts. In: Kalia VC, editor. Microbial factories: volume 1: biofuels and waste treatment. New York: Springer; 2015. pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huma N, Shankar P, Kushwah J, Bhushan A, Joshi J, Mukherjee T, Raju SC, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Diversity and polymorphism in AHL-lactonase gene (aiiA) of Bacillus. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21:1001–1011. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1105.05056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kalia VC. In search of versatile organisms for quorum sensing inhibitors: acyl homoserine lactones (AHL)-acylase and AHL-lactonase. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;359:143. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.1258512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kumar P, Pant DC, Mehariya S, Sharma R, Kansal A, Kalia VC. Ecobiotechnological strategy to enhance efficiency of bioconversion of wastes into hydrogen and methane. Indian J Microbiol. 2014;54:262–267. doi: 10.1007/s12088-014-0467-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kumar P, Singh M, Mehariya S, Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Ecobiotechnological approach for exploiting the abilities of Bacillus to produce co-polymer of polyhydroxyalkanoate. Indian J Microbiol. 2014;54:151–157. doi: 10.1007/s12088-014-0457-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kumar T, Singh M, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Potential of Bacillus sp. to produce polyhydroxybutyrate from biowaste. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106:2017–2023. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04160.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Patel SKS, Kumar P, Kalia VC. Enhancing biological hydrogen production through complementary microbial metabolisms. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37:10590–10603. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Patel SKS, Kumar P, Mehariya S, Purohit HJ, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Enhancement in hydrogen production by co-cultures of Bacillus and Enterobacter. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:14663–14668. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Patel SKS, Kumar P, Singh S, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Integrative approach to produce hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate from biowaste using defined bacterial cultures. Bioresour Technol. 2015;176:136–141. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Patel SKS, Kumar P, Singh S, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Integrative approach for hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate production, Ch 05. In: Kalia VC, editor. Microbial factories: volume 1: biofuels and waste treatment. New York: Springer; 2015. pp. 73–85. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Integrative approach for producing hydrogen and polyhydroxyalkanoate from mixed wastes of biological origin. Indian J Microbiol. 2016;56:293–300. doi: 10.1007/s12088-016-0595-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Porwal S, Kumar T, Lal S, Rani A, Kumar S, Cheema S, Purohit HJ, Sharma R, Patel SKS, Kalia VC. Hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate producing abilities of microbes from diverse habitats by dark fermentative process. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:5444–5451. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Qureshi A, Prabu SK, Purohit HJ. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas strain for utilization of 4-nitrophenol. Microbes Environ. 2001;16:49–52. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.2001.49. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Qureshi A, Purohit HJ. Isolation of bacterial consortia for degradation of p-nitrophenol from agricultural soil. Ann Appl Biol. 2002;140:159–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2002.tb00168.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Narde G, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Isolation and characterization of Citrobacter strain HPC for broad range substrate specificity for chlorophenols. Curr Microbiol. 2004;48:419–423. doi: 10.1007/s00284-003-4230-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qureshi A, Verma V, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Degradation of 4-nitroaniline by Stenotrophomonas strain HPC 135. Int J Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2007;60:215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thangaraj K, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Characterization of diverse Acinetobacter isolates for utilization of multiple aromatic compounds. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:2488–2494. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sinha MM, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Study of biodiversity of Klebsiella sp. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:203–207. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007-9457-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Selvakumaran S, Kapley A, Kalia VC, Purohit HJ. Phenotypic and phylogenic groups to evaluate the diversity of Citrobacter isolates from activated biomass of effluent treatment plants. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:1189–1195. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qureshi A, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Degradation of 2, 4, 6-Trinitrophenol (TNP) by Arthrobacter sp. HPC1223 isolated from effluent treatment plant. Indian J Microbiol. 2012;52:642–647. doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0288-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bera S, Roy AS, Mohanty K. Biodegradation of phenol by a native mixed bacterial culture isolated from crude oil contaminated site. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2017;121:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Puranik S, Talkal R, Qureshi A, Khardenavis A, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Genome sequence of the pigment-producing bacterium Pseudogulbenkiania ferrooxidans, isolated from Loktak Lake. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e01115-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01115-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Purohit HJ, Kapley A, Khardenavis A, Qureshi A, Dafale N. Insights in waste management bioprocesses using genomic tools. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2016;97:121–170. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kapley A, Sagarkar S, Tanksale H, Sharma N, Qureshi A, Khardenavis A, Purohit HJ. Genome sequence of Alcaligenes sp. strain HPC1271. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00235-12. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00235-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kalia VC, Lal S, Chauhan A, Bhattacharyya G. In silico reconstitution of novel routes for microbial plastic, Ch 19. In: Kalia VC, editor. Microbial factories. New Delhi: Springer; 2015. pp. 299–315. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Phale PS, Paliwal V, Raju SC, Modak A, Purohit HJ. Genome sequence of naphthalene-degrading soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida CSV86. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00234-12. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00234-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kalia VC, Kumar P. Genome wide search for biomarkers to diagnose Yersinia infections. Indian J Microbiol. 2015;55:366–374. doi: 10.1007/s12088-015-0552-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kalia VC, Kumar R, Kumar P, Koul S. A genome-wide profiling strategy as an aid for searching unique identification biomarkers for Streptococcus. Indian J Microbiol. 2016;56:46–58. doi: 10.1007/s12088-015-0561-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kumar R, Koul S, Kumar P, Kalia VC. Searching biomarkers in the sequenced genomes of Staphylococcus for their rapid identification. Indian J Microbiol. 2016;56:64–71. doi: 10.1007/s12088-016-0565-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tikariha H, Pal RR, Qureshi A, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. In silico analysis for prediction of degradative capacity of Pseudomonas putida SF1. Gene. 2016;1119:30491–30497. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Purohit HJ. Biosensors as molecular tools for bioremediation. J Clean Prod. 2003;11:293–301. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00072-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gulhane M, Pandit P, Khardenavis AA, Purohit HJ. Study of microbial community plasticity for anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste in plug flow bioreactor. Renew Energy. 2017;101:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Moharikar A, Purohit HJ. Specific ratio and survival of Pseudomonas CF600 as co-culture under DO limiting condition in cultivation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2003;52:255–260. doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00114-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhou W, Guo W, Zhou H, Chen X. Phenol degradation by Sulfobacillus acidophilus TPY via the meta-pathway. Microbiol Res. 2016;190:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Youness M, Sancelme M, Combourieu B, Besse-Hoggan P. Identification of new metabolic pathways in the enantioselective fungicide tebuconazole biodegradation by Bacillus sp. 3B6. J Hazard Mater. 2018;351:160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.02.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lee Y, Lee Y, Jeon CO. Biodegradation of naphthalene, BTEX, and aliphatic hydrocarbons by Paraburkholderia aromaticivorans BN5 isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil. Sci Rep. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36165-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Potts LD, Perez Calderon LJ, Gontikaki E, Keith L, Gubry-Rangin C, Anderson JA, Witte U. Effect of spatial origin and hydrocarbon composition on bacterial consortia community structure and hydrocarbon biodegradation rates. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:fiy127. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Luo J, Wu L, Chen Y, Feng L, Cao J. Integrated approach to enhance the anaerobic biodegradation of benz [α] anthracene: a high-molecule-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in sludge by simultaneously improving the bioavailability and microbial activity. J Hazard Mater. 2019;365:322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Dark-fermentative biological hydrogen production from mixed biowastes using defined mixed cultures. Indian J Microbiol. 2017;57:171–176. doi: 10.1007/s12088-017-0643-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Patel SKS, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Dark fermentative hydrogen production by defined mixed microbial cultures immobilized on ligno-cellulosic waste materials. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35:10674–10681. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Patel SKS, Ray S, Prakash J, Wee JH, Kim SY, Lee JK, Kalia VC. Co-digestion of biowastes to enhance biological hydrogen process by defined mixed bacterial cultures. Indian J Microbiol. 2019;59:154–160. doi: 10.1007/s12088-018-00777-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kapley A, Prasad S, Purohit HJ. Changes in microbial diversity in fed-batch reactor operation with wastewater containing nitroaromtic residues. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:2479–2484. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kapley A, Tolamare A, Purohit HJ. Role of oxygen in partial utilization of phenol by Pseudomonas CF600 in continuous culture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;17:801–804. doi: 10.1023/A:1013526001972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Narde G, Purohit HJ. Growth phase dependent substrate utilization by Pseudomonas strain PH1. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2002;38:653–657. doi: 10.1023/A:1020730712191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Moharikar A, Purohit HJ. Induction of phenol utilization in Pseudomonas CF600 grown under varying nitrogen levels. J Basic Microbiol. 2003;43:56–61. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200390005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Salicylic acid mediated enhanced biological treatment of wastewater. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;160:704–718. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8538-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kalia VC, Purohit HJ. Quenching the quorum sensing system: potential antibacterial drug targets. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2011;37:121–140. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2010.532479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wilén BM, Liébana R, Persson F, Modin O, Hermansson M. The mechanisms of granulation of activated sludge in wastewater treatment, its optimization, and impact on effluent quality. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:5005–5020. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8990-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liébana R, Modin O, Persson F, Wilén BM. Integration of aerobic granular sludge and membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018;38:801–816. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1414140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Tracking of phenol degrading genotype. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2001;8:89–90. doi: 10.1007/BF02987299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Moharikar A, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Detection of dioxygenase genes presents in various activated sludges. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2003;10:373–378. doi: 10.1065/espr2003.07.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kapley A, Lampel K, Purohit HJ. Rapid detection of Salmonella in water samples by multiplex PCR. Water Environ Res. 2001;73:461–465. doi: 10.2175/106143001X139515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kapley A, Lampel K, Purohit HJ. Thermocycling steps and optimization of multiplex PCR. Biotechnol Lett. 2000;22:1913–1918. doi: 10.1023/A:1026748202071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kapley A, Lampel K, Purohit HJ. Development of duplex PCR for Salmonella and Vibrio. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;16:457–458. doi: 10.1023/A:1008924119825. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Purohit HJ, Kapley A. Microbial quality control of drinking water: PCR as an emerging option. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20:325–326. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)02019-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Phenol mediated improved performance of active biomass for treatment of distillery wastewater. Int J Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2008;62:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.06.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Selvakumaran S, Kapley A, Kashyap SM, Daginawala HF, Kalia VC, Purohit HJ. Diversity of aromatic ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase gene in Citrobacter. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:4600–4609. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Verma V, Raju SC, Kapley A, Kalia VC, Kanade GS, Daginawala HF, Purohit HJ. Degradative potential of Stenotrophomonas strain HPC383 having genes homologous to dmp operon. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:3227–3233. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Verma V, Raju SC, Kapley A, Kalia VC, Daginawala HF, Purohit HJ. Evaluation of genetic and functional diversity of Stenotrophomonas isolates from diverse effluent treatment plants. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:7744–7753. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ghosh S, Qureshi A, Purohit HJ. Enhanced expression of catechol 1,2 dioxygenase gene in biofilm forming Pseudomonas mendocina EGD-AQ5 under increasing benzoate stress. Int J Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2017;118:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bengtsson G, Törneman N, De Lipthay JR, Sørensen SJ. Microbial diversity and PAH catabolic genes tracking spatial heterogeneity of PAH concentrations. Microb Ecol. 2013;65:91–100. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Machado LF, de Assis Leite DC, da Costa Rachid CTC, Paes JE, Martins EF, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS. Tracking mangrove oil bioremediation approaches and bacterial diversity at different depths in an in situ mesocosms system. Front Microbiol. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Purohit HJ, Kalia VC, More R. Soft computing for biological systems. Berlin: Springer; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Raje DV, Purohit HJ, Singh RN. Distinguishing features of 16S rDNA gene for five dominating bacterial genus observed in bioremediation data. J Comput Biol. 2002;9:819–829. doi: 10.1089/10665270260518290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Purohit HJ, Raje DV, Kapley A. Identification of signature and primers specific to genus Pseudomonas using mismatched patterns of 16s rDNA sequences. BMC Bioinform. 2003;4:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Liśkiewicz Maciej, Purohit Hemant J., Raje Dhananjay V. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2004. Relation of Residues in the Variable Region of 16S rDNA Sequences and Their Relevance to Genus-Specificity; pp. 362–373. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Iyer DS, Raje DV, Purohit HJ, Gupta A, Singh RN. CAGCAG—the most consistent repeating pattern in evolution of small sub-unit of rRNA gene sequences. Curr Sci. 2004;87:494–499. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Raje DV, Purohit HJ, Lijnzaad P, Singh RN. Statistical analysis of counts and spacing of consistent repeating patterns in a set of homologous DNA sequences. Curr Sci. 2006;91:00113891. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Qureshi A, Mohan M, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. In-situ bioremediation of organochlorine pesticide contaminated microcosm soil and evaluation by gene probe. Pest Manage Sci. 2009;65:798–804. doi: 10.1002/ps.1757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Raje DV, Purohit HJ, Badhe YP, Tambe SS, Kulkarni BD. Self-Organizing maps: a tool to ascertain taxonomic relatedness based on features derived from 16S rDNA sequences. J Biosci. 2010;35:617–627. doi: 10.1007/s12038-010-0070-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.More R, Purohit HJ. The identification of discriminating patterns from 16S rRNA gene to generate signature for Bacillus genus. J Comput Biol. 2016;23:651–661. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2016.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Purohit HJ, Kapley A, Moharikar A, Narde G. A novel approach for extraction of PCR-compatible DNA from activated sludge samples collected from different biological effluent treatment plants. J Microbiol Methods. 2003;52:315–323. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00185-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Albertsen M, Karst SM, Ziegler AS, Kirkegaard RH, Nielsen PH. Back to basics–the influence of DNA extraction and primer choice on phylogenetic analysis of activated sludge communities. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0132783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gupta P, Manjula A, Rajendhran J, Gunasekaran P, Vakhlu J. Comparison of metagenomic DNA extraction methods for soil sediments of high elevation Puga hot spring in Ladakh, India to explore bacterial diversity. Geomicrobiol J. 2017;34:289–299. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2015.1128995. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Emaus MN, Clark KD, Hinners P, Anderson JL. Preconcentration of DNA using magnetic ionic liquids that are compatible with real-time PCR for rapid nucleic acid quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:4135–4144. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1092-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Moharikar A, Purohit HJ, Kumar R. Microbial population dynamics at effluent treatment plants. J Environ Monitor. 2005;7:552–558. doi: 10.1039/B406576J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dafale N, Agrawal L, Kapley A, Meshram S, Purohit HJ, Wate S. Selection of indicator bacteria based on screening of 16S rDNA metagenomic library from a two-stage anoxic–oxic bioreactor system degrading azo dyes. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:476–484. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kapley A, Thierry B, Purohit HJ. Eubacterial diversity of activated biomass from a CETP. Res Microbiol. 2007;158:494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by diverse Diaphorobacter sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77:403–409. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1176-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Rani A, Porwal S, Sharma R, Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Assessment of microbial diversity in effluent treatment plants by culture dependent and culture independent approaches. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:7098–7107. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Prajapati VS, Purohit HJ, Raje DV, Parmar N, Patel AB, Jones OA, Joshi CG. The effect of a high-roughage diet on the metabolism of aromatic compounds by rumen microbes: a metagenomic study using Mehsani buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:1319–1331. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Parmar K, Dafale N, Pal R, Tikariha H, Purohit HJ. An insight into phage diversity at environmental habitats using comparative metagenomics approach. Curr Microbiol. 2018;75:132–141. doi: 10.1007/s00284-017-1357-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Talkal R, Tikariha H, Purohit HJ. An approach to in silico dissection of bacterial intelligence through selective genomic tools. Indian J Microbiol. 2018;58:278–286. doi: 10.1007/s12088-018-0726-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Tikariha H, Purohit HJ. Different dimensions in microbial community adaptation and function. Indian J Microbiol. 2019;59:387–390. doi: 10.1007/s12088-019-00813-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Mohan SV, Agarwal L, Mohanakrishna G, Srikanth S, Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Sharma PN. Firmicutes with iron dependent hydrogenase drive hydrogen production in anaerobic bioreactor using distillery wastewater. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36:8234–8342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Pandit P, Gulhane M, Khardenavis AA, Purohit HJ. Mining of hemicellulose and lignin degrading genes from differentially enriched methane producing microbial. Bioresour Technol. 2016;216:923–930. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.More RP, Mitra S, Raju SC, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Mining and assessment of catabolic pathways in the metagenome of a common effluent treatment plant to induce the degradative capacity of biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2014;153:137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Gulhane M, Khardenavis AA, Karia S, Pandit P, Kanade GS, Lokhande S, Vaidya A, Purohit HJ. Biomethanation of vegetable market waste in an anaerobic baffled reactor: effect of effluent recirculation and carbon mass balance analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2016;215:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Atuanya EI, Purohit HJ, Chakrabarty T. Anaerobic and aerobic biodegradation of chlorophenols using UASB and ASG bioreactors. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;16:95–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1008957229070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Marican A, Durán-Lara EF. A review on pesticide removal through different processes. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:2051–2064. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0796-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Jaiswal S, Singh DK, Shukla P. Gene editing and systems biology tools for pesticide bioremediation: a review. Front Microbiol. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kalia VC, Purohit HJ. Microbial diversity and genomics in aid of bioenergy. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35:403–419. doi: 10.1007/s10295-007-0300-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Khardenavis AA, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Processing of poultry feathers by alkaline keratin hydrolyzing enzyme from Serratia sp. HPC 1383. Waste Manag. 2009;29:1409–1415. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Patel SKS, Singh M, Kumar P, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Exploitation of defined bacterial cultures for production of hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate from pea-shells. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;36:218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Fuke P, Pal RR, Khardenavis AA, Purohit HJ. In silico characterization of broad range proteases produced by Serratia marcescens EGD-HP20. J Basic Microbiol. 2018;58:492–500. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201700474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Bohra V, Dafale N, Purohit HJ. Understanding the alteration in rumen microbiome and CAZymes profile with diet and host through comparative metagenomic approach. Arch Microbiol. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01706-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Purohit HJ. Aligning microbial biodiversity for valorization of biowastes: conception to perception. Indian J Microbiol. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s12088-019-00826-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Chhatre S, Purohit HJ, Shanker R, Khanna P. Bacterial consortia for crude oil spill remediation. Water Sci Technol. 1996;34:187–193. doi: 10.1007/s0273-1223(96)001713-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Domde P, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Impact of bioaugmentation with consortium of bacteria on the remediation of wastewater containing hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2007;14:7–11. doi: 10.1065/espr2006.11.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Pal RR, Khardenavis AA, Purohit HJ. Identification and monitoring of nitrification and denitrification genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae EGD-HP19-C for its ability to perform heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification. Funct Integr Genomics. 2015;15:63–76. doi: 10.1007/s10142-014-0406-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Paliwal V, Raju SC, Modak A, Phale PS, Purohit HJ. Pseudomonas putida CSV86: A candidate genome for genetic bioaugmentation. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e84000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Liu X, Selonen V, Steffen K, Surakka M, et al. Meat and bone meal as a novel biostimulation agent in hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2019;225:574–578. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Xu X, Zarecki R, Medina S, et al. Modeling microbial communities from atrazine contaminated soils promotes the development of biostimulation solutions. ISME J. 2019;13:494. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0288-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Dangelmayr MA, Figueroa LA, Williams KH, Long PE. Characterizing organic carbon dynamics during biostimulation of a uranium contaminated field site. Biogeochemistry. 2019;143:117–132. doi: 10.1007/s10533-019-00553-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ghosh S, Qureshi A, Purohit HJ. d-Tryptophan governs biofilm formation rates and bacterial interaction in P. mendocina and S. aureus. J Biosci. 2019;44:3. doi: 10.1007/s12038-018-9841-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Sarkar J, Kazy SK, Gupta A, et al. Biostimulation of indigenous microbial community for bioremediation of petroleum refinery sludge. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1407. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Roy A, Dutta A, Pal S, et al. Biostimulation and bioaugmentation of native microbial community accelerated bioremediation of oil refinery sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2018;253:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Cervantes-González E, Guevara-García MA, García-Mena J, Ovando-Medina VM. Microbial diversity assessment of polychlorinated biphenyl–contaminated soils and the biostimulation and bioaugmentation processes. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191:118. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7227-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Raimondo EE, Saez JM, Aparicio JD, Fuentes MS, Benimeli CS. Coupling of bioaugmentation and biostimulation to improve lindane removal from different soil types. Chemosphere. 2020;238:124512. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Wu M, Wu J, Zhang X, Ye X. Effect of bioaugmentation and biostimulation on hydrocarbon degradation and microbial community composition in petroleum-contaminated loessal soil. Chemosphere. 2019;237:124456. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Cycoń M, Mrozik A, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Bioaugmentation as a strategy for the remediation of pesticide-polluted soil: a review. Chemosphere. 2017;172:52–71. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.dos Santos JJ, Maranho LT. Rhizospheric microorganisms as a solution for the recovery of soils contaminated by petroleum: a review. J Environ Manag. 2018;210:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Dagher D, de la Providencia I, Pitre F, St-Arnaud M, Hijri M. Plant identity shaped rhizospheric microbial communities more strongly than bacterial bioaugmentation in petroleum hydrocarbon-polluted sediments. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2144. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Asemoloye MD, Jonathan SG, Ahmad R. Synergistic plant-microbes interactions in the rhizosphere: a potential headway for the remediation of hydrocarbon polluted soils. Int J Phytoremed. 2019;21:71–83. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2018.1474437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Turkovskaya O, Muratova A. Plant–bacterial degradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere. Trends Biotechnol. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Agarwal L, Prakash A, Purohit HJ. Expression of autotrophic genes under CO2 environment and genome mining of desert bacterium Cupriavidus sp. HPC(L) Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Agarwal L, Qureshi A, Kalia VC, Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Singh RN. Arid ecosystem: Future option for carbon sinks using microbial community intelligence. Curr Sci. 2014;106:1357–1363. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Tikariha H, Purohit HJ. Assembling a genome for novel nitrogen-fixing bacteria with capabilities for utilization of aromatic hydrocarbons. Genomics. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Yu W, Chen H, Song J, Zhao C, Du X, Guo C, Song Q. Microbial community from arid desert oilfield in response to accurate bio-stimulation remediation. Petrol Sci Technol. 2019;37:337–345. doi: 10.1080/10916466.2018.1547752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Keller M, Zengler K. Tapping into microbial diversity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:141. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Lim SW, Tran TM, Abate AR. PCR-activated cell sorting for cultivation-free enrichment and sequencing of rare microbes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0113549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Diagnosis of treatment efficiency in industrial wastewater treatment plants: a case study at a refinery ETP. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:3789–3795. doi: 10.1021/es803296r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Tikariha H, Khardenavis AA, Purohit HJ. Dissolved oxygen mediated quorum sensing phenomenon in the bacterial community to combat oxidative stress. Arch Microbiol. 2018;200:1371–1379. doi: 10.1007/s00203-018-1551-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Patel S, Homaei A, Patil S, Daverey A. Microbial biosurfactants for oil spill remediation: pitfalls and potentials. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:27–37. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9434-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Chhatre S, Shanker R, Chakrabarti T, Khanna P. Osmotolerance and hydrocarbon degradation by genetically engineered bacterial consortium. Bioresour Technol. 1999;67:241–245. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00121-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kumari S, Regar RK, Manickam N. Improved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in a crude oil by individual and a consortium of bacteria. Bioresour Technol. 2018;254:174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Jha V, Tikariha H, Dafale N, Purohit HJ. Exploring the rearrangement of sensory intelligence in Proteobacteria: insight of Pho regulon. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;34:172. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2551-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Puranik S, Shaligram S, Paliwal V, Raje DV, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Demonstration of sequential adaptation strategy for developing salt tolerance in bacteria for wastewater treatment: a study using Escherichia coli as model. Bioresour Technol. 2012;121C:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Puranik S, Purohit HJ. Dependency of cellular decision making in physiology and influence of preceding growth conditions. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;174:1982–1998. doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-1167-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Puranik S, Purohit HJ. Dynamic interactive events in gene regulation using E. coli dehydrogenase as a model. Funct Integr Genomics. 2015;15:175–188. doi: 10.1007/s10142-014-0418-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Purohit HJ, Khardenavis AA, Vaidya AN, Kalia VC. Mining the microbial community for redefining the bioprocess in the future, Ch 19. In: Purohit HJ, Kalia VC, Khardenavis AA, Vaidya AN, editors. Optimization and applicability of bioprocess. New Delhi: Springer; 2017. pp. 409–418. [Google Scholar]
- 153.Kalia VC. Quorum sensing inhibitors: an overview. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:224–245. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Kalia VC, Kumar P. Potential applications of quorum sensing inhibitors in diverse fields, Ch 29. In: Kalia VC, editor. Quorum sensing vs quorum quenching: a battle with no end in sight. New York: Springer; 2015. pp. 359–370. [Google Scholar]
- 155.Kalia VC, Kumar P. The battle: quorum-sensing inhibitors versus evolution of bacterial resistance, Ch 31. In: Kalia VC, editor. Quorum sensing vs quorum quenching: a battle with no end in sight. New York: Springer; 2015. pp. 385–391. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Kalia VC, Patel SKS, Kang YC, Lee J-K. Quorum sensing inhibitors as antipathogens: biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:68–90. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Kalia VC, Wood TK, Kumar P. Evolution of resistance to quorum-sensing inhibitors. Microb Ecol. 2014;68:13–23. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0316-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Kalia VC, Koul S, Ray S, Prakash S. Targeting quorum sensing mediated Staphylococcus aureus biofilms, Ch 02. In: Kalia VC, editor. Biotechnological applications of quorum sensing inhibitors. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- 159.Saini AK, Kalia VC. Potential challenges and alternative approaches in metabolic engineering of bioactive compounds in industrial setup, Ch 19. In: Kalia VC, Saini AK, editors. Metabolic engineering for bioactive compounds: strategies and processes. Singapore: Springer; 2017. pp. 405–412. [Google Scholar]
- 160.Xia S, Song Z, Jeyakumar P, et al. A critical review on bioremediation technologies for Cr(VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2019;49:1027–1078. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2018.1564526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Cameselle C, Gouveia S, Urréjola S. Benefits of phytoremediation amended with DC electric field. Application to soils contaminated with heavy metals. Chemosphere. 2019;229:481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Purohit HJ, Tikariha H, Kalia VC. Current scenario on application of computational tools in biological systems, Ch 01. In: Purohit HJ, Kalia VC, More R, editors. Soft computing for biological systems. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Ghosh S, Qureshi A, Purohit HJ. Biofilm micro-environments: modeling approach, Ch 15. In: Purohit HJ, Kalia VC, Khardenavis AA, Vaidya AN, editors. Optimization and applicability of bioprocess. New Delhi: Springer; 2017. pp. 305–324. [Google Scholar]
- 164.Purohit HJ, Tikariha H, Kalia VC. Future perspectives of computational biology: demanding shifts in analytical thinking to unfold biological complexities, Ch 17. In: Purohit HJ, Kalia VC, More R, editors. Soft computing for biological systems. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 283–293. [Google Scholar]

