Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Feb 4;10:1778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58374-z

Porphyromonas gingivalis triggers the shedding of inflammatory endothelial microvesicles that act as autocrine effectors of endothelial dysfunction

Isaac Maximiliano Bugueno 1, Fatiha Zobairi El-Ghazouani 1, Fareeha Batool 1, Hanine El Itawi 1, Eduardo Anglès-Cano 2, Nadia Benkirane-Jessel 1, Florence Toti 1,4, Olivier Huck 1,3,
PMCID: PMC7000667  PMID: 32019950

Abstract

A link between periodontitis and atherothrombosis has been highlighted. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of Porphyromonas gingivalis on endothelial microvesicles (EMVPg) shedding and their contribution to endothelial inflammation. Endothelial cells (EC) were infected with P. gingivalis (MOI = 100) for 24 h. EMVPg were isolated and their concentration was evaluated by prothrombinase assay. EMVPg were significantly increased in comparison with EMVCtrl shedded by unstimulated cells. While EMVCtrl from untreated EC had no effect, whereas, the proportion of apoptotic EC was increased by 30 nM EMVPg and viability was decreased down to 25%, a value elicited by P. gingivalis alone. Moreover, high concentration of EMVPg (30 nM) induced a pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative cell response including up-regulation of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 as well as an altered expression of iNOS and eNOS at both mRNA and protein level. An increase of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 mRNA expression (4.5 folds and 3 folds respectively (p < 0.05 vs untreated) was also observed after EMVPg (30 nM) stimulation whereas P. gingivalis infection was less effective, suggesting a specific triggering by EMVPg. Kinasome analysis demonstrated the specific effect induced by EMVPg on main pro-inflammatory pathways including JNK/AKT and STAT. EMVPg are effective pro-inflammatory effectors that may have detrimental effect on vascular homeostasis and should be considered as potential autocrine and paracrine effectors involved in the link between periodontitis and atherothrombosis.

Subject terms: Infection, Chronic inflammation

Introduction

Periodontitis is an infectious inflammatory disease associated with soft tissue inflammation and destruction of the tooth-supporting tissues characterized by increased periodontal pocket depth, gingival bleeding and clinical attachment loss. Such disease impairs oral health related quality of life and is considered the main cause of dental mobility and tooth loss1. Periodontitis affects a large proportion of the worldwide population and prevalence of its severe forms is estimated to be around 11% with a peak incidence around 38 years of age2. The development of periodontitis is associated with the establishment of a dysbiosis characterized by the predominance of anaerobic species, including Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), and an imbalanced host-immune response inducing periodontal tissue destruction3.

During the last decades, periodontal diseases were associated with various chronic diseases such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, adverse pregnancy outcomes and cardiovascular diseases, suggesting a systemic impact46 with an enhanced proportion of worsened cardiovascular outcomes79. Indeed, patients with periodontitis are more prone to endothelial dysfunction, aneurysmal disease progression10, coronary artery narrowing, and an increased all-cause and cardio-vascular related mortality11,12. Moreover, in a clinical trial, intensive periodontal treatment of patients with severe periodontitis, improved at 6 months the endothelial dysfunction, a well-known marker of vascular injury7 thereby strengthening the causative link.

Among the proposed biological mechanisms3,5,10,13, the impact of oral and more specifically periodontal bacteria, on arterial homeostasis14 is suggested by their eventual dissemination in blood flow from the periodontal pocket. Interestingly, they were detected in atheromatous plaques as well as in the wall of healthy vessels in patients suffering from mild to severe periodontitis15,16. P. gingivalis, an anaerobic bacteria considered as a keystone periodontal pathogen, was demonstrated, in vitro1720 and in vivo21,22 as a pro-inflammatory and pro-atheromatous mediator. Indeed, P. gingivalis exhibits a large number of virulence factors such as lipopolysaccharide (Pg-LPS), fimbriae or gingipaïns, contributing to the modulation of the innate immune response mainly through activation of Toll-Like-Receptors (TLRs)–dependent pathways1,5,17,18. Nevertheless, infection by P. gingivalis enhances endothelial inflammation or cell death in response to either low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) or pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α), two circulating mediators associated with elevated cardiovascular risk, thus, highlighting a potential impact in the development of atherothrombosis18. However, the hypothesis of a detrimental effect solely induced by direct infection remains controversial as clinical trials assessing the preventative effect of antibiotic therapy did not show significant benefit in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular acute events in patients with history of myocardial infarction or myocardial ischemia23. Recently, the CANTOS trial pointed out inflammation as a key driver of atherothrombosis in patients with pro-inflammatory background. However, anti-interleukin-1β (IL-1β) antibodies although improving the cardiovascular outcomes failed to reduce cardiovascular mortality24. The eventual vascular impact of a variety of inflammatory mediators acting as autocrine or paracrine cellular effectors has been proposed25,26. Amongst them, microvesicles of endothelial origin (EMV) shed from the inflamed endothelium in response to infection could be the possible missing link between the infection-driven and the pro-thrombotic vascular responses.

Microvesicles (MV), also termed microparticles, are plasma membrane vesicles ranging from 50 nm to 1 µm released from stimulated cells. They contain a variety of active molecules such as lipids, enzymes, receptors and microRNAs. One characteristic feature of MV is that they expose phosphatidylserine (PhtdSer), an anionic phospholipid translocated from the inner to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. In addition, membrane proteins at the surface of the mother cell allow the characterization of their cell origin in body fluids. Circulating procoagulant EMV have been demonstrated as relevant biomarkers of vascular insult of atherothrombotic, inflammatory or mechanical origin, including ischemia reperfusion. Regardless of their cell origin, circulating MV emerge as the new actors of cellular crosstalk acting as procoagulant, pro-inflammatory, apoptotic or senescent pathogenic messengers under pathological conditions. Verily, the initial cellular stress at the origin of the MV shedding appears of relevance in the induction of a specific cell dysfunction27. In the context of infectious disease, the shedding of CD105+EMV has been proven to have a prognosis value in sepsis-induced coagulopathy28, whereas circulating MV of platelet and leukocyte origin released upon inflammation favor the recruitment of leukocytes at the surface of the inflamed endothelium29,30.

This study aims to determine in vitro the influence of P. gingivalis infection on EMV shedding (EMVPg) and to evaluate an eventual autocrine action of EMVPg as noxious effectors possibly contributing to the dissemination of endothelial cell inflammatory responses and dysfunction.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC) (HUVEC, PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) were cultured in EGM2 medium (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Culture medium was changed each 3 days and no antibiotics were added to the medium.

Endothelial cell infection by P. gingivalis

P. gingivalis strain 33277 (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) was cultured under strict anaerobic conditions at 37 °C in brain-heart infusion medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) supplemented with hemin (5 μg/ml) and menadione (1 μg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich). Bacteria were collected and counted as previously described31. Twenty-four hours before infection, 2 × 105 EC/ml were seeded per well in a 24-well plate. EC were washed twice with PBS before infection with P. gingivalis at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100. After 2 h of infection, medium was removed and infected EC were washed three times with PBS to remove non-adherent and external bacteria. Then, metronidazole (200 μg/mL) was added for 1 h to kill external bacteria and, after washing, 1 mL of fresh medium was added in each well. For comparative purposes, in some experiments, EC were stimulated with P. gingivalis ultrapure lipopolysaccharide (Pg-LPS) (1 μg/ml) (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) for 24 h.

Measurement of EMV released in EC supernatant

After 24 h, supernatants from LPS-treated or P. gingivalis-infected EC were collected under sterile conditions. Detached EC and debris were discarded by low speed centrifugation (300 g; 15 min). EMV were then concentrated after two successive centrifugations (14000 g; 1 h at 4 °C), collected in 400 to 600 μl of HBSS (Hanks’ Balanced Salt solution) (Sigma-Aldrich) and stored at 4 °C. EMV concentration was measured by prothrombinase assay of the MV ubiquitous Phtdser exposure as previously described. Briefly, EMV were captured onto insolubilized Annexin-V, a protein with high affinity for Phtdser, using streptavidin-coated microtitration plates (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). After three washings, EMV were measured by prothrombinase assay in which blood clotting factors and calcium concentrations ensure that the PhtdSer borne by EMV is the rate-limiting parameter in the generation of soluble thrombin from prothrombin. After 10 min of incubation at 37 °C with human FXa (106 pM, Hyphen Biomed, France), Factor Va (FVa, 250 pM, Sekuisu, USA), prothrombin (FII, 3.5 µM, Hyphen BioMed, Paris, France) and CaCl2, thrombin generation was assessed in a multiplate spectrophotometer at 405 nm (Versamax, Molecular Devices, Wokingam Berkshire, UK) using a chromogenic thrombin substrate (PNAPEP0216 1.52 mM, Cryopep, Montpellier, France). Results were expressed as nanomolar PhtdSer equivalents (nM PhtdSer eq.) by reference to a standard curve established using liposomes of known composition and concentration32.

Treatment of EC with EMV

EC were seeded in a 24-wells plate at 2 × 105 cells/well. After 24 h, attached EC were washed and incubated with 5 to 30 nM of EMVCtrl (unstimulated EC) or EMVPg according to the experiment.

Measurement of cell metabolic activity

Cell metabolic activity was determined using colorimetric AlamarBlue test (Life Technologies, Saint-Aubin, France) as described previously and according to manufacturer’s instructions33. Briefly, after 24 h of stimulation with EMV or P. gingivalis, 300 μl of cell supernatants were transferred to 96-well plates and optical density was measured at 570 and 595 nm in order to determine the percentage of AlamarBlue reduction.

Determination of the cell viability

The cellular viability was evaluated using a fluorescence-based LIVE/DEAD® assay (LIVE/DEAD® Cell Imaging Kit, Molecular Probes™, Invitrogen) after 24 h of either infection or EMV stimulation. Cells were washed twice with PBS before staining. The staining solution consisted of 0.5 μL/mL calcein AM reagent and 2 μL/mL EthD-1 reagent mixed in 2 mL PBS. Samples were incubated for 10 min before analysis using a 10x and 20x objective lens of a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX53F, Tokyo, Japan), filters for fluorescein and Texas Red for calcein and EthD-1 staining and digital CCD color imaging system (Microscope Digital Camera DP72; CellSens Entry®, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Measurement of cell apoptosis and necrosis

Annexin V-propidium iodide double staining was performed on washed trypsinized EC using the Annexin-V-FLUOS Staining Kit (Roche Applied Science, Meylan, France) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For each condition, a total of 1 × 104 isolated cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using a BDTM LSR II. The percentage of positive cells for IPPE (necrosis), Annexin-VFITC and IPPE (late apoptosis), Annexin-V Positive Cells VFITC (apoptosis), and unlabeled (viable cells) was determined from quadrant analysis.

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNAs from samples were extracted using Tri reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total RNA concentration was quantified by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop 1000, Fischer Scientific, Illkirch, France) at 230 nm. Reverse transcription was performed using the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix kit (Biorad, Miltry-Mory, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed on the cDNA samples and gene expression was further analyzed using the CFX ConnectTM Real-Time PCR Detection System (Biorad, Miltry-Mory, France). Amplification reactions have been performed using iTAq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Biorad, Miltry-Mory, France). β-actin was used as endogenous RNA control (housekeeping gene) in all samples. Primers related to β-actin, TNF-α, Il-6, Il-8, P21, P53, CDK4, eNOS, iNOS, SOD-1, VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and tissular factor (TF) were synthesized (ThermoFischer, Saint-Aubin, France) (Table 1). Expression level was calculated after normalization to the housekeeping gene expression.

Table 1.

Primers sequences.

Gene (Human) Sense strand Sequences
β-actin

Forward

Reverse

5′-AACGGCTCCGGCATGTGCAA-3′

5′-CTTCTGACCCATGCCCACCA-3′

TNF-α

Forward

Reverse

5′-AGGCGCTCCCCAAGAAGACA-3′

5′-TCCTTGGCAAAACTGCACCT-3′

Il-6

Forward

Reverse

5′-GCCTTCGGTCCAGTTGCCTT-3′

5′-GCAGAATGAGATGAGTTGTC-3′

Il-8

Forward

Reverse

5′-ATGACTTCCAAGCTGGCCGTGGCT-3′

5′-TCTCAGCCCTCTTCAAAAACTTCTC-3′

P21

Forward

Reverse

5′-TGGAGACTCTCAGGGTCGAAA-3′

5′-GGCGTTTGGAGTGGTAGAAATC-3′

P53

Forward

Reverse

5′-AACGGTACTCCGCCACC-3′

5′-CGTGTCACCGTCGTGGA-3′

CDK4

Forward

Reverse

5′-CATGTAGACCAGGACCTAAGG-3′

5′-AACTGGCGCATCAGATCCTAG-3′

eNOS

Forward

Reverse

5′-CGGCATCACCAGGAAGAAGA-3′

5′-CATGAGCGAGGCGGAGAT-3′

iNOS

Forward

Reverse

5′-TGGATGCAACCCCATTGTC-3′

5′-CCCGCTGCCCCAGTTT-3′

SOD-1

Forward

Reverse

5′-TAAAGTAGTCGCGGAGACGGG-3′

5′-CGGCCTCGCAACACAAGCCT-3′

VCAM-1

Forward

Reverse

5′-ATTGGGAAAAACAGAAAAGAG-3′

5′-GGCAACATTGACATAAAGT-3′

ICAM-1

Forward

Reverse

5′-GGCCGGCCAGCTTATACAC-3′

5′-TAGACACTTGAGCTCGGGCA-3′

CD142 (TF)

Forward

Reverse

5′-GACAATTTTGGAGTGGGAACCC-3′

5′-CACTTTTGTTCCCACCTG-3′

Proteome profile array of phospho-kinases

Total protein extraction and purification were performed from cell lysates as previously described20. Briefly, cells were lysed for 5 min on ice in 200 μl of ice-cold RIPA buffer (65 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) supplemented with phosphatase inhibitor cocktails I and II and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany). Then, standardized concentration of total proteins was subjected to a Proteome Profiler Human Phospho-Kinase Array (R&D Systems, Lille, France) following manufacturer’s instructions. The density of spots, corresponding to protein activation, was measured by MyImageTM Analysis Software 2.0 (Thermofisher) for each molecule and each condition.

Western blotting

Briefly, cells were lysed for 5 min on ice in 200 μl of ice-cold RIPA buffer (65 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) supplemented with phosphatase inhibitor cocktails I and II and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany). Lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4 °C for 10 min, supernatants were collected for quantification using the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and 20 μg of cell lysates were loaded on a 12% SDS-PAGE for each condition. Antibodies against human eNOS (1/1000, mouse IgG, BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France), P21 (1/1000, rabbit IgG, Abcam, Paris, France), P53 (1/1000, rabbit IgG, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany), VCAM (1/500, rabbit IgG, Abcam, Paris, France), ICAM-1 (1/1000, mouse IgG, Life technologies, Courtaboeuf, France), CDK4 (1/1000, rabbit IgG, Life technologies), SOD-1 (1/1000, rabbit IgG, Life technologies), iNOS (1/1000, rabbit IgG, Life technologies) and against β-actin (1/2000, mouse IgG) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany) were used for immunolabelling. Secondary alkaline phosphatase conjugated antibodies (anti-mouse (1/3000) or anti-rabbit (1/5000)) were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, Texas, USA).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

TNF-α secreted in the cell supernatant was assessed by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Briefly, a goat anti-Human TNF-α antibody, (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) was coated on a multi-well plate (4 μg/mL). Then, supernatants were added overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, TNF-α was detected using a biotinylated goat anti-Human TNF-α (PeproTech). After 3 washing steps to discard unbound antibodies, HRP conjugated streptavidin (mix of solution A + B, as manufacturer instructions) was added and incubated for 20 to 30 minutes at room temperature. Finally, 100 μL of the stop solution (horseradish peroxidase and TMB substrate Solution, SS04, Life Technologies, Saint-Aubin, France) was added to each well for 5 to 30 min and then OD was measured by spectrophotometer (450 nm). The concentration of TNF-α was calculated by reference to a standard curve obtained with recombinant human TNF-α (PeproTech).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using pair-wise Anova test and post-hoc Tukey’s test. Statistical significance level was considered for p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using PRISM 6.0 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). All experiments have been performed at least three times from three different EC culture batches (biological and technical replicates).

Results

Endothelial microvesicles generated in response to P. gingivalis are pro-apoptotic endothelial effectors

P. gingivalis infection (MOI:100) led to a significant 2.8 fold in the shedding of EC after 24 h (infected vs. untreated, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1A) whereas the ultrapure Pg-LPS alone (1 μg/ml) had no significant effect (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, no MV shedding was detected in P. gingivalis culture supernatant (Supplementary Informations Fig. 1). The putative cytotoxic effect of EMVPg shed after P. gingivalis infection and of EMVCtrl shed from unstimulated cells was assessed after 24 h of incubation with the endothelial monolayer. While no cytotoxic effect has been observed for EMVCtrl, increasing concentrations of EMVPg (5 to 30 nM) led to a significant 10% and 25% concentration-dependent reduction of cell viability and survival respectively (Fig. 1B–D, p < 0.05 vs untreated cells), values measured after 30 nM EMVPg treatment reaching the range of those elicited by P. gingivalis alone (MOI:100). A nearly 2-fold enhancement in the proportion of EC showing late apoptosis was observed in response to P. gingivalis infection or to 20–30 nM EMVPg by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy (P. gingivalis-triggered 1.7-fold fold vs untreated; 20 nM EMVPg -induced 1.6-fold vs untreated and 30 nM EMVPg -induced 1.5-fold vs untreated), while, the proportion of EC with early apoptosis was unchanged at 20 nM and drastically increased by 30 nM EMVPg suggesting a concentration threshold (Fig. 1E).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

P. gingivalis promotes EMV shedding and alters endothelial cell viability. (A) The generation of EMV from naïve EC (control) and following 24 h of infection with P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI = 100) or stimulation with Pg-LPS (1μg/ml) was measured in the supernatant by prothrombinase assay. Concentrations are represented by mean +/− SD from 3 independent experiments; *p < 0.05 vs control (unstimulated EC). (B) Metabolic activity of EC infected with Pg (MOI = 100) or exposed to EMVCtrl (upper panel) and EMVPg (lower panel) (5, 10, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h measured by AlamarBlue assay. Results are expressed as mean +/− SD from 3 independent experiments; *p < 0.05 vs control (unstimulated EC). (C) Live-Dead assay to evaluate the ratio of live EC versus dead EC in cells exposed to P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (5, 10, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h. Results are expressed as percentage of live and dead EC (mean +/−SD). (D) Immunofluorescence imaging of live-dead staining (green: live EC, red: dead EC) for each condition after 24 hours of exposure. (E) Evaluation of type of cell death by flow cytometry after P. gingivalis infection and EMVPg (20 and 30 nM) exposure for 24 h. EC were labelled with Annexin-V FITC and propidium iodide (IPPE). All data were expressed as mean ± SD. *(p < 0.05 vs untreated cells).

EMVPg switch the mRNA and protein expression profiles of endothelial cells to a characteristic pro-inflammatory pattern

The potential pro-inflammatory P. gingivalis or EMVPg -induced action was first assessed by the analysis of mRNA transcripts following a 24 h incubation with 5–30 nM EMVPg. An up-regulation in the expression of pro-inflammatory TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 cytokines mRNA was detected, reaching similar TNF-α expression after either P. gingivalis infection or 30 nM EMVPg (6.5 folds P. gingivalis or EMVPg -induced vs untreated) (Fig. 2A). IL-6 mRNA expression was enhanced by 2.2 fold (P. gingivalis -induced vs. untreated; p < 0.05) whereas, IL-8 mRNA was highly and solely enhanced by 30 nM EMVPg by 6-fold. This pro-inflammatory switch was further confirmed by ELISA assay. Increased TNF-α concentrations after P. gingivalis infection (2.3 fold; p < 0.05) and EMVPg stimulation (2 folds; p < 0.05) were measured after 24 h of incubation (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, proteome analysis showed that several inflammation-related pathways are modulated following P. gingivalis or EMVPg stimulation (Fig. 4). Interestingly, not only did the JNK/AKT but also STAT were differentially up-regulated following endothelial infection or stimulation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

EMVPg trigger inflammatory endothelial response. (A) The mRNA expression of inflammatory markers TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 in EC exposed to P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (5, 10, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h was measured by qRT-PCR. (B) The gene expression of cell cyle related markers p53, p21 and CDK4 EC in EC exposed to P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (5, 10, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h. All data were expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05 between cells infected or stimulated against control (unstimulated cells).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

EMVPg induce pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative protein expression similar to P. gingivalis infection. (A) TNF-α secretion in supernatant by EC in response to P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (5, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h was measured by ELISA. (B) Intra-cellular protein expression of eNOS, P21, ICAM-1, CDK4, P53, VCAM, iNOS and SOD-1 in response to P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (5, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h was evaluated by Western Blot. All data were expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments and normalized against internal control β-actin. *p < 0.05 between cells infected or stimulated against control (unstimulated cells).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Exposure to EMVPg modulates significantly inflammatory pathways related to kinases activation. Analysis of kinases activation induced by P. gingivalis infection (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (30 nM) for 24 h evaluated by phospho-kinase array. The density of spots was measured by MyImageTM Analysis Softwate 2.0 (Thermofisher) for each molecule and each condition. (A) Graphical representation of the kinases expression in untreated EC, in EC following P. gingivalis infection (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (30 nM) stimulation for 24 h. (B) Heat-map representation of the kinases expression normalized against untreated control (untreated EC).

Because leukocyte recruitment at the surface of the inflamed endothelium is one of the initial steps for atherothrombosis34, expression of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 adhesion molecules that favor leukocyte attachment was also assessed. After 24 h incubation, 30 nM EMVPg significantly augmented both VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 mRNA expression (4.5 folds and 3 folds respectively (p < 0.05 vs untreated) whereas P. gingivalis infection was less effective at the chosen concentration, suggesting a specific triggering by EMVPg as compared to the above pro-inflammatory cytokines induction (Fig. 5A). Nevertheless, infection by P. gingivalis, significantly increased the expression of tissue factor (TF), the cellular initiator of the coagulation cascade at the endothelial surface, and also a pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic inducer35 after 24 h. Interestingly, EMVPg incubation led to a concentration-dependent expression of TF mRNA, reaching values prompted by P. gingivalis infection (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

EMVPg induce expression of atherothrombosis and oxidative stress markers expression. (A) The mRNA expression of endothelial markers VCAM, ICAM and Tissular factor (TF) in EC exposed to P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (5, 10, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h was measured by qRT-PCR. (B) The gene expression of oxidative stress markers eNOS, iNOS and SOD-1 in EC exposed to P. gingivalis (Pg) (MOI:100) and EMVPg (5, 10, 20 and 30 nM) for 24 h. All data were expressed as mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05 between cells infected or stimulated against control (unstimulated cells).

EMVPg modulate endothelial oxidative stress and promote endothelial dysfunction

Because nitric oxide is one of the major vasoprotectors released by endothelial cells under physiological conditions and a very diffusible mediator of vaso-relaxation, we investigated whether the expression of NO synthases would be altered by EMVPg. In this context, under conditions mimicking cardiovascular pathological conditions, like cytokine treatment or angiotensin II-induced endothelial dysfunction, iNOS, the inducible form of NO synthase (iNOS) is up-regulated, whereas, the constitutive eNOS expression remains unchanged36. Herein, 24 h after P. gingivalis infection or 20–30 nM EMVPg EC treatment, the expression of eNOS was significantly reduced at both transcriptional and protein levels (2.1 folds; p < 0.05) (Figs. 3B, 4, 5B). At contrary, increased iNOS expression was induced by P. gingivalis and EMVPg and enhanced by 2 and 5.8 folds respectively (p < 0.05 vs. untreated), thereby indicating endothelial dysfunction, eventually altered vascular function and possible eNOS uncoupling37. The expression of endothelial superoxide dismutase (SOD-1), an enzyme that rapidly inactivates superoxide anions, was also triggered by P. gingivalis and 30 nM EMVPg that both induced a 400% mRNA rise after 24 h, emphasizing the importance of cytoprotective signaling pathways in the endothelial response to major oxidative stress (Figs. 3B, 5B).

Because oxidative stress and the control of cell cycle are closely related, we also investigated whether P. gingivalis infection or EMVPg could also trigger regulators of the cell cycle. Indeed, both endothelial treatments targeted the oncosuppressor P53 and its downstream partner P21, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 and an inducer of senescence with a significant increase in P21 and P53 mRNA levels (4.7 and 14.3 folds respectively) (Fig. 2B). Moreover, the P53 up-regulation was confirmed by western-blot and proteomic analysis (Figs. 3B, 4). Conversely, a significant 2.3-fold decrease in the mRNA and protein expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK4 was evidenced (p < 0.05 vs untreated) (Figs. 2B, 3B).

Altogether, these data strongly suggest that endothelial dysfunction in response to P. gingivalis infection or EMVPg stimulation is associated with oxidative stress and modulation of the cell cycle in a redox-dependent manner as reported in human and murine endothelial cells36,38.

Discussion

This study demonstrates the autocrine pro-inflammatory properties of EMVPg shed from EC in response to P. gingivalis infection. Results indicate that after 24 h of incubation, the shed EMVPg appear as key mediators of endothelial dysfunction, switching the cytoprotective phenotype of endothelial cells toward a pro-inflammatory, pro-coagulant, pro-apoptotic and, eventually, a pro-senescent phenotype. All such phenotypes are a hallmark of sustained periodontitis in periodontal vascularization and atherothrombosis progression in large arteries. Furthermore, most of the cell responses investigated were of comparable severity whether initiated by P. gingivalis or by high concentration of EMVPg.

Because MV are procoagulant owing to PhtdSer exposure and the eventual presence of TF when shed from monocytes, neutrophils and endothelial cells, their impact as pathogenic effectors in acute or chronic cardiovascular diseases and associated disorders such as myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, unstable angina, type-2 diabetes and their accumulation in the arteriosclerotic plaque has been extensively studied in relationship with the vascular inflammatory responses27. In blood, MV constitute a dynamic storage pool of vascular effectors, whereby, their cellular origin and concentration characterizing the severity of the disease or of organ damage. Of note, EMV, even circulating as a small proportion of the vascular pool were found of prognostic value in organ and cellular graft rejection39, pulmonary hypertension40, sepsis-induced coagulopathy41 and cardiovascular diseases4245.

Strikingly, reports concerning infection-related MV shedding and how both host and pathogens produce MV are scarce. For instance, virulence factors, like LMP1 from the replicating Epstein-Barr virus, can be embedded in MV released from the infected cell and further spread virus through paracrine interactions with yet non-infected target cells. Similarly, human immunodeficiency virus also promotes MV shedding to transfer CCR5, its co-receptor on macrophages, to non-exposing target cells, consequently, promoting its own spreading46. MV hijacking by pathogens could also be the causative of link between periodontitis and cardiovascular disease, as strongly supported by our data and previous reports47. In congruence with our data, Chlamydia pneumoniae was also detected within atheromatous plaques and demonstrated to up-regulate the endothelial expression of the TF within 24 h together with the release of TF+-EMV that persisted for 1 week48. Most interestingly, we identified via proteomic and transcriptomic assays that the EMV shedding in response to P. gingivalis was associated with characteristic prerequisite pathways of the cytoskeleton proteolytic cleavage and plasma membrane remodeling preceding the MV release from the inflamed or stimulated endothelium38. Indeed, the P38 MAP kinase pathway that promotes the release of pro-inflammatory MV from human aortic endothelial cells in response to TNF-α49 was activated in our infection- driven model of pathogenic MV generation.

In this study, we emphasized the role of EMVPg as systemic pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidant effectors of endothelial responses mediated by P. gingivalis. In our in vitro MV-mediated model, EMVPg at 30 nM acted as cytotoxic endothelial effectors to an extent that was similar to the sole P. gingivalis infection (MOI = 100), via the activation of inflammatory pathways evidenced through Kinasome analysis. The up-regulation of TNF-α and IL-6 proinflammatory cytokines and their secretion eventually associated to an uncontrolled oxidative stress via the down-regulation of eNOS and the up-regulation of iNOS suggest NO synthase uncoupling. Therefore, our data altogether strengthen, the hypothesis of an EMV mediated P. gingivalis systemic response. This observation is strongly suggestive of a noxious role of EMVPg, eventually disseminated in blood flow to target healthy endothelial cells, even under conditions where its pathogenic inducer P. gingivalis would remain sequestered in the periodontal tissues by cells of the innate immune response50. Endothelial inflammation via TNF-α, IL-1β, or IL-6 pro-inflammatory cytokines favors leukocyte recruitment, endothelial dysfunction and activation of blood coagulation making interleukin-driven proatherothrombotic processes a potential pharmacological target explored in several clinical trials51,52. In view of the recent anti-interleukin therapy trials, that failed to demonstrate a benefit on cardiovascular outcome, circulating EMV released upon pathogen infection appear to be another target since EMV are able to concentrate at endothelial sites where flow disturbance favors enhanced interactions with MV, namely at artery branches prone to the development of atherotrombosis plaques. It was reported that MV sequestered in plaques act as paracrine endothelial up-regulators of pro-inflammatory ICAM-1 or VCAM-1 prompting leukocyte recruitment in the growing plaque43,53. Whether the plaque of patients subjected to chronic exposure of EMV released from distant endothelial infected sites undergo exaggerated endothelial inflammation remains to be demonstrated in specific animal models of atherothrombosis and in clinical trials. Nevertheless, we also showed that EMVPg triggered inflammation-related pathways. Indeed, the modulation of upstream NF-KB activators but also of transcription factors such as STAT confirmed their pro-inflammatory effect, as STAT pathway is a major signaling route converting the cytokine signal into gene expression programs regulating the proliferation and differentiation of the immune cell54.

P. gingivalis was previously demonstrated as a specific TLR4-dependent endothelial actor in pro-inflammatory TNF-α and IL-6 secretion following endothelial invasion or via its virulence factors such as LPS55,56. Moreover, several studies demonstrated the importance of NF-KB pathways in P. gingivalis elicited inflammation in several cell types5760. In a previous report, we were able to demonstrate that TLR4+MV generated by Pseudomonas were true mediators of NF-KB-dependent signaling in TLR4HEK engineered cells via IKB phosphorylation61. In the present study, our data confirm and extend these observations, by showing that EMV released upon P. gingivalis infection are autocrine endothelial effectors possibly contributing to plaque endothelium inflammation and erosion62. Such effect appears specific to the EMV shedding trigger as only EMVPg were able to induce a significant endothelial cell response while none was measured with EMVCtrl. This observation highlights the need of deep analysis of the EMVPg content, including mRNA, miRNA and proteins, as it was shown that such content is highly influenced by both triggers; the cellular environment and pre-existing conditions63,64. It also paves the way of future clinical trials aiming to determine MV phenotype in the context of variable periodontitis severity and P. gingivalis infection.

Accumulation of ROS and endothelial redox imbalance have been widely demonstrated in the atherothrombotic plaque in vitro, in animal models and in human vascular tissues43,65. Oxidative stress is up-regulated upon infection by Escherichia coli or Salmonella typhimurium6668. Conversely, in vitro models indicate that eNOS endothelial activity is reduced upon TNF-α or LPS incubation69 whereas experimental bacterial meningitis in engineered mice with iNOS invalidation support the hypothesis of a dual endothelial iNOS and eNOS up-regulation upon comparison with wild type individuals70. Here, EMVPg triggered oxidative stress via altered the expression of iNOS and eNOS at mRNA and protein levels, data altogether supporting eNOS uncoupling owing to major ROS accumulation and consecutive endothelial dysfunction, together with blunted cytoprotective signaling pathways against excessive inflammatory and pro-thrombotic responses. Interestingly, circulating MV in patients with coronary artery disease are elevated in comparison to that with healthy individuals and contain reduced functional eNOS. Furthermore, it was also demonstrated that a proportion of EMV circulating in such patients reduce the availability of NO in coronary artery endothelial cells and down regulate its expression71. Further studies are required to characterize a specific sub-population of endothelial MV eventually responsible for the systemic dissemination of the pathogen-driven inflammatory and pro-oxidant signals to uninfected endothelial cells and possibly contributing to endothelial dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease.

In this study, P. gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 was used as a pathogenic model. It should be mentioned that this strain is not the most virulent and future studies should determine the pro-inflammatory impact of others strains or mutants lacking fimbriae or gingipaïns as it was demonstrated a significant impact of such virulence factors on experimental outcomes in different cell types72,73. Future studies should also determine the precise composition of EMVPg as their content is clearly influenced by the quantity and type of cellular stress trigger. Indeed, a specific insight should be made on mRNA, miRNA, proteins and membrane receptors64,74,75.

In conclusion, P. gingivalis-induced EMV are effective pro-inflammatory effectors potentially involved in cardiovascular disease worsening. Nevertheless, autocrine and paracrine actions of EMV need further characterization of embedded noxious content, and of their cellular and subcellular molecular partners. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of sustained yet low bacterial or virulence factors as well as low grade cytokine dissemination. A specific emphasis should be done on more relevant in vitro models such as human aortic endothelial cells and in vivo. Causative links between periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases should be investigated to decipher the systemic routes of the periodontal pathogenic signal dissemination. Local EMV released at distance from the thrombogenic plaque are a good candidate.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

This work was partly funded by Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR ENDOPAROMP ANR-17-CE17-0024-01 and ANR COCERP ANR-16-CE29-0009-03).

Author contributions

I.M. Bugueno, F. Zobairi El-Ghazouani, E. Anglès-Cano, F. Toti, O. Huck contributed to conception and design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript. F. Batool, H. El Itawi, N. Benkirane-Jessel contributed to data analysis and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-58374-z.

References

  • 1.Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ. Breaking bad: Manipulation of the host response by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014;44:328–338. doi: 10.1002/eji.201344202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kassebaum NJ, et al. Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990–2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J. Dent. Res. 2014;93:1045–1053. doi: 10.1177/0022034514552491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hajishengallis G. Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015;15:30–44. doi: 10.1038/nri3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Linden GJ, Lyons A, Scannapieco FA. Periodontal systemic associations: review of the evidence. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2014;40:8–19. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huck O, Elkaim R, Davideau JL, Tenenbaum H. Evaluating periodontal risk for patients at risk of or suffering from atherosclerosis: recent biological hypotheses and therapeutic consequences. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2011;104:352–358. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lockhart PB, et al. Periodontal disease and atherosclerotic vascular disease: does the evidence support an independent association?: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:2520–2544. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31825719f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tonetti MS, et al. Treatment of Periodontitis and Endothelial Function. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;356:911–920. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pothineni NVK, et al. Infections, atherosclerosis, and coronary heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:3195–3201. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rosenfeld ME, Campbell LA. Pathogens and atherosclerosis: update on the potential contribution of multiple infectious organisms to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thromb. Haemost. 2011;106:858–867. doi: 10.1160/TH11-06-0392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Salhi L, et al. Can Periodontitis Influence the Progression of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm? A Systematic Review. Angiology. 2019;70:479–491. doi: 10.1177/0003319718821243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu F, Lu B. Prospective association of periodontal disease with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: NHANES III follow-up study. Atherosclerosis. 2011;218:536–542. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Buhlin K, et al. Periodontitis is associated with angiographically verified coronary artery disease. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2011;38(11):1007–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liljestrand JM, et al. Immunologic burden links periodontitis to acute coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 2018;268:177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zelkha SA, Freilich RW, Amar S. Periodontal innate immune mechanisms relevant to atherosclerosis and obesity. Periodontol. 2010;2000(54):207–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00358.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elkaïm R, et al. Prevalence of periodontal pathogens in subgingival lesions, atherosclerotic plaques and healthy blood vessels: a preliminary study. J. Periodontal Res. 2008;43:224–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.01018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Amar S, Engelke M. Periodontal Innate Immune Mechanisms Relevant to Atherosclerosis. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2015;30:171–185. doi: 10.1111/omi.12087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huck O, Elkaim R, Davideau JL, Tenenbaum H. Porphyromonas gingivalis-impaired innate immune response via NLRP3 proteolysis in endothelial cells. Innate Immun. 2015;21:65–72. doi: 10.1177/1753425914523459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bugueno Isaac Maximiliano, Khelif Yacine, Seelam Narendra, Morand David-Nicolas, Tenenbaum Henri, Davideau Jean-Luc, Huck Olivier. Porphyromonas gingivalis Differentially Modulates Cell Death Profile in Ox-LDL and TNF-α Pre-Treated Endothelial Cells. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0154590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huck, O. et al. Identification and Characterization of MicroRNA Differentially Expressed in Macrophages Exposed to Porphyromonas gingivalis Infection. Infect. Immun. 23;85(3) (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Bugueno IM, Batool F, Korah L, Benkirane-Jessel N, Huck O. Porphyromonas gingivalis Differentially Modulates Apoptosome Apoptotic Peptidase Activating Factor 1 in Epithelial Cells and Fibroblasts. Am. J. Pathol. 2018;188:404–416. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Velsko IM, et al. Active invasion of oral and aortic tissues by Porphyromonas gingivalis in mice causally links periodontitis and atherosclerosis. PloS One. 2014;9:e97811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li L, Messas E, Batista EL, Levin RA, Amar S. Porphyromonas gingivalis infection accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis in a heterozygous apolipoprotein E-deficient murine model. Circulation. 2002;105:861–867. doi: 10.1161/hc0702.104178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Song Z, Brassard P, Brophy JM. A meta-analysis of antibiotic use for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Can. J. Cardiol. 2008;24:391–395. doi: 10.1016/S0828-282X(08)70603-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lutgens Esther, Atzler Dorothee, Döring Yvonne, Duchene Johan, Steffens Sabine, Weber Christian. Immunotherapy for cardiovascular disease. European Heart Journal. 2019;40(48):3937–3946. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Welsh P, Grassia G, Botha S, Sattar N, Maffia P. Targeting inflammation to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a realistic clinical prospect? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017;174:3898–3913. doi: 10.1111/bph.13818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Van Tassell BW, Toldo S, Mezzaroma E, Abbate A. Targeting Interleukin-1 in Heart Disease. Circulation. 2013;128:1910–1923. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ridger VC, et al. Microvesicles in vascular homeostasis and diseases. Position Paper of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology. Thromb. Haemost. 2017;117:1296–1316. doi: 10.1160/TH16-12-0943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meziani F, Delabranche X, Asfar P, Toti F. Bench-to-bedside review: circulating microparticles–a new player in sepsis? Crit. Care Lond. Engl. 2010;14:236. doi: 10.1186/cc9231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barry OP, Praticò D, Savani RC, Fitzgeral GA. Modulation of monocyte-endothelial cell interactions by platelet microparticles. J. Clin. Invest. 1998;102:136–144. doi: 10.1172/JCI2592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mause, S. F., Von Hundelshausen, Zernecke, A., Koene, R. R. & Weber, C. Platelet microparticles: a transcellular delivery system for RANTES promoting monocyte recruitment on endothelium. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 1512–1518 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Huck O, Elkaim R, Davideau JL, Tenenbaum H. Porphyromonas gingivalis and its lipopolysaccharide differentially regulate the expression of cathepsin B in endothelial cells. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2012;27:137–148. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2012.00638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jy W, et al. Measuring circulating cell-derived microparticles. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2004;2:1842–1851. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Keller L, et al. Nanoengineered implant as a new platform for regenerative nanomedicine using 3D well-organized human cell spheroids. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2017;12:447–457. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S116749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.May AE, et al. Platelet-Leukocyte Interactions in Inflammation and Atherothrombosis. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2007;33:123–127. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-969023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cimmino G, Cirillo P. Tissue factor: newer concepts in thrombosis and its role beyond thrombosis and hemostasis. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2018;8:581–593. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.10.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Khemais-Benkhiat S, et al. The Redox-sensitive Induction of the Local Angiotensin System Promotes Both Premature and Replicative Endothelial Senescence: Preventive Effect of a Standardized Crataegus Extract. J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2016;71:1581–1590. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bhagat K, Hingorani AD, Palacios M, Charles IG, Vallance P. Cytokine-induced venodilatation in humans in vivo: eNOS masquerading as iNOS. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999;41:754–764. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00249-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Burger D, et al. Endothelial microparticle formation by angiotensin II is mediated via Ang II receptor type I/NADPH oxidase/Rho kinase pathways targeted to lipid rafts. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011;31:1898–1907. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.222703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Morel O, et al. Endothelial cell activation contributes to the release of procoagulant microparticles during acute cardiac allograft rejection. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bakouboula B, et al. Procoagulant membrane microparticles correlate with the severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:536–543. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200706-840OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Delabranche, X., Helms, J. & Meziani, F. Immunohaemostasis: a new view on haemostasis during sepsis. Ann. Intensive Care7 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Amabile N, et al. Association of circulating endothelial microparticles with cardiometabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Eur. Heart J. 2014;35:2972–2979. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rautou PE, et al. Microparticles from human atherosclerotic plaques promote endothelial ICAM-1-dependent monocyte adhesion and transendothelial migration. Circ. Res. 2011;108:335–343. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.237420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yin M, Loyer X, Boulanger CM. Extracellular vesicles as new pharmacological targets to treat atherosclerosis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015;763:90–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.06.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Boulanger CM, Dignat-George F. Microparticles: an introduction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011;31:2–3. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.220095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mack M, et al. Transfer of the chemokine receptor CCR5 between cells by membrane-derived microparticles: a mechanism for cellular human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection. Nat. Med. 2000;6:769–775. doi: 10.1038/77498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lai FW, Lichty BD, Bowdish DME. Microvesicles: ubiquitous contributors to infection and immunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2015;97:237–245. doi: 10.1189/jlb.3RU0513-292RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ettelaie C, Collier MEW, James NJ, Li C. Induction of tissue factor expression and release as microparticles in ECV304 cell line by Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Atherosclerosis. 2007;190:343–351. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Curtis AM, et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase targets the production of proinflammatory endothelial microparticles. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2009;7:701–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cooper PR, Palmer LJ, Chapple ILC. Neutrophil extracellular traps as a new paradigm in innate immunity: friend or foe? Periodontol. 2013;2000(63):165–197. doi: 10.1111/prd.12025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ridker PM. Anticytokine Agents: Targeting Interleukin Signaling Pathways for the Treatment of Atherothrombosis. Circ. Res. 2019;124:437–450. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ridker PM. Clinician’s Guide to Reducing Inflammation to Reduce Atherothrombotic Risk: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;72:3320–3331. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Leroyer AS, et al. Cellular origins and thrombogenic activity of microparticles isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007;49:772–777. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pfitzner E, Kliem S, Baus D, Litterst CM. The role of STATs in inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2004;10:2839–2850. doi: 10.2174/1381612043383638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kocgozlu L, Elkaim R, Tenenbaum H, Werner S. Variable cell responses to P. gingivalis lipopolysaccharide. J. Dent. Res. 2009;88:741–745. doi: 10.1177/0022034509341166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ho YS, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae-dependent interleukin-6 autocrine regulation by increase of gp130 in endothelial cells. J. Periodontal Res. 2009;44:550–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2008.01150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Huck, O. et al. Reduction of Articular and Systemic Inflammation by Kava-241 in Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced Arthritis Murine Model. Infect. Immun., 10.1128/IAI.00356-18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 58.Singh SP, Huck O, Abraham NG, Amar S. Kavain Reduces Porphyromonas gingivalis-Induced Adipocyte Inflammation: Role of PGC-1α Signaling. J. Immunol. 2018;201:1491–1499. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yuan H, Gupte R, Zelkh S, Amar S. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand antagonists inhibit tissue inflammation and bone loss in experimental periodontitis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2011;38:1029–1036. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wan M, Liu J, Ouyang X. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 1 regulates Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression in endothelial cells through NF-κB pathway. J. Periodontal Res. 2015;50:189–196. doi: 10.1111/jre.12192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Constantinescu AA, et al. Exocrine cell-derived microparticles in response to lipopolysaccharide promote endocrine dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2014;13:219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hansson GK, Libby P, Tabas I. Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. J. Intern. Med. 2015;278:483–493. doi: 10.1111/joim.12406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Giannella A, et al. Circulating levels and characterization of microparticles in patients with different degrees of glucose tolerance. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2017;16:118. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0600-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Enjeti AK, Ariyarajah A, D’Crus A, Seldon M, Lincz LF. Circulating microvesicle number, function and small RNA content vary with age, gender, smoking status, lipid and hormone profiles. Thromb. Res. 2017;156:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Loyer X, Vion AC, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM. Microvesicles as cell-cell messengers in cardiovascular diseases. Circ. Res. 2014;114:345–353. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chiang SM, Schellhorn HE. Regulators of oxidative stress response genes in Escherichia coli and their functional conservation in bacteria. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2012;525:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fu J, et al. Salmonella proteomics under oxidative stress reveals coordinated regulation of antioxidant defense with iron metabolism and bacterial virulence. J. Proteomics. 2017;157:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Farr SB, Kogoma T. Oxidative stress responses in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Microbiol. Rev. 1991;55:561–585. doi: 10.1128/mr.55.4.561-585.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cardaropoli S, Silvagno F, Morra E, Pescarmona GP, Todros T. Infectious and inflammatory stimuli decrease endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity in vitro. J. Hypertens. 2003;21:2103–2110. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200311000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Winkler F, Koedel U, Kastenbauer S, Pfister HW. Differential expression of nitric oxide synthases in bacterial meningitis: role of the inducible isoform for blood-brain barrier breakdown. J. Infect. Dis. 2001;183:1749–1759. doi: 10.1086/320730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Abbas M, et al. Endothelial Microparticles From Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Induce Premature Coronary Artery Endothelial Cell Aging and Thrombogenicity: Role of the Ang II/AT1 Receptor/NADPH Oxidase-Mediated Activation of MAPKs and PI3-Kinase Pathways. Circulation. 2017;135:280–296. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.017513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jayaprakash K, Demirel I, Khalaf H, Bengtsson T. Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced inflammatory responses in THP1 cells are altered by native and modified low-density lipoproteins in a strain-dependent manner. APMIS. 2018;126:667–677. doi: 10.1111/apm.12860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rodrigues PH, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis strain specific interactions with human coronary artery endothelial cells: a comparative study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Madkhali Y, et al. The Ratio of Factor VIIa:Tissue Factor Content within Microvesicles Determines the Differential Influence on Endothelial Cells. TH Open. 2019;3:e132–e145. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pasquier J, et al. Circulating microparticles in acute diabetic Charcot foot exhibit a high content of inflammatory cytokines, and support monocyte-to-osteoclast cell induction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16450. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16365-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES