Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
letter
. 2020 Feb 5;24:38. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2750-9

How I use transcranial Doppler in the ICU

Chidinma L Onweni 1,2, Diane C McLaughlin 1, William D Freeman 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC7001253  PMID: 32020883

We read with great interest the article by Drs. Robba and Taccone [1]. We agree completely with the versatility of transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in the neurointensive care unit (NeuroICU) population and similarly employ it for its uses for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain death, and circulatory arrest, and as a noninvasive surrogate for intracranial compliance and elastance [2]. We feel the authors’ work is important, especially at a time when TCD seems to be falling out of favor in some NeuroICUs and guidelines. However, we find this ironic, since there is a rise in general critical care ultrasound given its noninvasive utility without ionizing radiation risk compared to computed tomography-based methods of diagnostic evaluation of chest and abdominal body cavities. In our experience, TCD (both blind methods with Spencer ST3 machines, for example) and TCD-imaging methods are useful in the NeuroICU, with 2 major technical caveats: the need for (1) adequate ultrasonographic skills of acquiring imaging and (2) adequate training in interpretation of all features on TCD imaging, including the pulsatility index (i.e., Gosling) and resistance indices (e.g., Pourcelot) [3]. In some cases, teleneurosonology can be performed assuming the 2 caveats above are in place [4]. The most common reason we see for lack of adoption of TCD in intensive care/NeuroICU practice is the lack of these 2 elements. Finally, we note the word “vasospasm” is missing an “s” in Fig. 1, but overall, we commend the authors for their nice summary of TCD use.

Abbreviations

NeuroICU

Neurointensive care unit

TCD

Transcranial Doppler

Authors’ contributions

CLO, DCM, and WDF contributed to the conception, writing, and critical revision of this letter. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None

Availability of data and materials

NA

Ethics approval and consent to participate

NA

Consent for publication

NA

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

This comment refers to the article available at 10.1186/s13054-019-2700-6.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Robba C, Taccone FS. How I use transcranial Doppler. Crit Care. 2019;23:420. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2700-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Freeman WD. Management of intracranial pressure. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2015;21:1299–1323. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sierra J, Hanel R, Mooney L, Freeman W. Differential considerations of TCD pulsatility (Gosling’s) and resistance (Pourcelot) indices after AVM surgery. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2014;7:41–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rubin MN, Barrett KM, Freeman WD, Lee Iannotti JK, Channer DD, Rabinstein AA, Demaerschalk BM. Teleneurosonology: a novel application of transcranial and carotid ultrasound. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:562–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

NA


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES