Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Medical Microbiology
. 2016 Sep;65(9):885–896. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000303

Naegleria fowleri after 50 years: is it a neglected pathogen?

Moisés Martínez-Castillo 1, Roberto Cárdenas-Zúñiga 1, Daniel Coronado-Velázquez 1, Anjan Debnath 2, Jesús Serrano-Luna 3, Mineko Shibayama 1,
PMCID: PMC7001490  PMID: 27381464

Abstract

It has been 50 years since the first case of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), an acute and rapidly fatal disease of the central nervous system (CNS), was reported in Australia. It is now known that the aetiological agent of PAM is Naegleria fowleri, an amoeba that is commonly known as ‘the brain-eating amoeba’. N. fowleri infects humans of different ages who are in contact with water contaminated with this micro-organism. N. fowleri is distributed worldwide and is found growing in bodies of freshwater in tropical and subtropical environments. The number of PAM cases has recently increased, and the rate of recovery from PAM has been estimated at only 5 %. Amphotericin B has been used to treat patients with PAM. However, it is important to note that there is no specific treatment for PAM. Moreover, this amoeba is considered a neglected micro-organism. Researchers have exerted great effort to design effective drugs to treat PAM and to understand the pathogenesis of PAM over the past 50 years, such as its pathology, molecular and cellular biology, diagnosis and prevention, and its biological implications, including its pathogenic genotypes, its distribution and its ecology. Given the rapid progression of PAM and its high mortality rate, it is important that investigations continue and that researchers collaborate to gain better understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease and, consequently, to improve the diagnosis and treatment of this devastating infection of the CNS.

Keywords: Naegleria fowleri, Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, Pathogenicity, Diagnosis, Treatment

Introduction

Protozoal infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, second only to HIV infection (Mishra et al., 2009). Recently, diseases caused by members of the free-living amoebae (FLA) group have been included in these statistics (Mishra et al., 2009; WHO, 2009). FLA are protists that are distributed worldwide. Naegleria fowleri, Acanthamoeba spp. and Balamuthia mandrillaris are the most common FLAs with medical implications; these micro-organisms can produce severe and fatal infections in the CNS of humans and other mammals (Rodríguez-Zaragoza, 1994). In this review, we will focus on the pathogenic behaviour of N. fowleri, which is the aetiological agent of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), an acute and fulminant disease of the CNS (Schuster & Visvesvara, 2004). N. fowleri infections have been reported in healthy children and young adults who have recently participated in swimming activities in water sources contaminated with this amoeba (Marciano-Cabral, 1988) and in developing countries with a lack of control procedures or preventive information against N. fowleri (Siddiqui & Khan, 2014).

CNS infection by N. fowleri occurs by the amoebae passing through the nasal cavity, penetrating the olfactory neuroepithelium, migrating through the olfactory nerves (Fig. 1a) and crossing the cribriform plate until they reach the olfactory bulbs (OBs) (Martinez et al., 1973; Jarolim et al., 2000; Rojas-Hernández et al., 2004).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematic representation of N. fowleri infection. (a) Initial stages of PAM. (1) Evasion of innate immune response, (2) independent-contact cytotoxicity (naegleriapores), (3) adhesion to epithelial cells, (4) invasion of the neuroepithelium, (5) migration to OBs. (b) Late stages of PAM. (6) Contact with olfactory phyla, (7) amoeba crossing the cribriform plate, (8) N. fowleri proliferation and inflammatory reaction in the OBs, (9) tissue damage (haemorrhage, phagocytosis and protease release).

Once the amoebae reach the brain, they can proliferate and induce an acute inflammatory reaction (Fig. 1b), leading to patient death in approximately 1 week (Cervantes-Sandoval et al., 2008a). The clinical symptoms consist of several bi-frontal headaches, neck stiffness, vomiting and coma. N. fowleri can be isolated from soil, tap water, swimming pools, freshwater lakes and thermal springs (Marciano-Cabral, 1988). Pathogenic strains have been isolated from water at 10–45 °C, pond mud at 16  °C and soil at 8 °C; amoebae found in soil have been reported to serve as vectors for other micro-organisms (Tyndall & Domingue, 1982). The interaction between N. fowleri and humans occurs accidentally, given that this amoeba is not considered an obligate parasite. More recently, the infection has been associated with religious and cultural practices (Siddiqui & Khan, 2014) and, in some cases, with hygienic procedures, such as sinus irrigation using contaminated water (Diaz & Boudreaaux, 2013). When an infection of the protozoan occurs, it can damage tissues after the invasion to the CNS. A broad battery of mechanisms, such as pore-forming proteins, proteases and adhesion-mediating glycoproteins, among others, are involved in the pathogenic mechanisms through which N. fowleri acts (Aldape et al., 1994; Herbst et al., 2002; Serrano-Luna et al., 2007; Shibayama et al., 2013) (Fig. 1a). However, to date, not all of the biological mechanisms utilized by N. fowleri have been elucidated, and many studies are required to provide a better understanding of its molecular pathogenesis. It is important to mention that, in the past few years, the death rate of the reported cases has been greater than 95 %. This situation may be due to the symptoms and signs of PAM being similar to those of bacterial or viral meningitis or to the lack of a timely diagnosis and, therefore, the lack of a specific and appropriate treatment (Heggie, 2010).

Taxonomy

The classification system for protozoal unicellular eukaryotes developed by Levine et al. (1980) was based primarily on ultrastructural studies. The new system for classifying unicellular eukaryotes utilizes modern data obtained using morphological approaches, biochemical-pathway analysis and molecular phylogeny (Adl et al., 2005). In this classification system, Naegleria spp. are included in the paraphyletic supergroup Excavata (Simpson, 2003; Cavalier-Smith et al., 2015), in the group Heterolobosea (Adl et al., 2005) and the family Vahlkampfiidae (De Jonckheere, 2004; Adl et al., 2005). The N. fowleri genome is not yet available; however, some studies aimed at classifying Naegleria spp. have been performed, particularly focussing on their molecular and genetic characteristics. The origin and evolution of Naegleria have been evaluated: this genus includes more than 40 species, but N. fowleri is the only species that is known to infect and cause disease in humans (De Jonckheere, 2011). The most accepted system for the identification of N. fowleri species was created by De Jonckheere (2011). This molecular typing system, which is based on the sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS1) and 5.8S rDNA, revealed the existence of at least eight different genotypes of N. fowleri. These genotypes are unevenly distributed on different continents: there are three genotypes (I, II and III) in America, seven genotypes (II, III, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII) in Europe, one genotype (V) in Oceania and two genotypes (II and III) in Asia. Of these eight genotypes, only four have been identified in patients (types I, II, III and V) (De Jonckheere, 2011, 2014). Recent findings regarding the molecular machinery and biochemical pathways of Naegleria gruberi could provide important information that will allow phylogenic reorganization of members of the Naegleria genus (Fritz-Laylin et al., 2010, 2011).

Ecology and morphology

Members of the genus Naegleria are distributed worldwide in soil and water (De Jonckheere, 2012) and have been isolated from fresh and warm-water lakes, streams, spas, heated but non-chlorinated swimming pools, hot springs, hydrotherapy and remedial pools, aquaria, sewage and even the nasal passages and throats of healthy individuals (Rodríguez-Zaragoza, 1994; Trabelsi et al., 2012). This amoeba has also been isolated from various animals, including reptiles, amphibians and fishes (Dyková et al., 2001; Pantchev & Tappe, 2011). However, this micro-organism has not been recovered from seawater, suggesting its sensitivity to elevated osmolarity. The vertical distribution of N. fowleri in water has been correlated with the presence of cyanobacteria and eubacteria; therefore, it is possible that the natural function of Naegleria genus is regulating bacterial populations (Kyle & Noblet, 1985). Additionally, the distribution of Naegleria has been associated with the concentrations of manganese and iron in the water column (Kyle & Noblet, 1985; Martinez-Castillo et al., 2015). N. fowleri is thermophilic and can survive temperatures of up to 45 °C (Kyle & Noblet, 1987). Therefore, these amoebae proliferate mainly during the summer months, when the environmental temperature is likely to be high (Sifuentes et al., 2014).

The length of trophozoites is approximately 15–25 µm. In an axenic culture, cytoplasmic lobopodia, which are used for locomotion, are present (Fig. 2a). In addition, these organisms have cytoplasmic projections called food cups that allow them to phagocytose bacteria, yeast, erythrocytes and cellular debris (Fig. 3) (Scaglia et al., 1991).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Different cell stages of N. fowleri. (a) Typical morphology of N. fowleri trophozoites in axenic culture. (b) Flagellar form induced by isotonic saline solution for 2 h. The flagella (arrows) are evident. (c) Cyst induced by 1323 Page’s amoeba saline solution. The cyst wall was stained with calcofluor white reagent. The images were obtained with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope. Magnifcation, ×60.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Scanning electron microscopy of N. fowleri trophozoites interacted with erythrocytes. Three phagocytic mouths are seen (arrows), red blood cells (e). Jeol (JSM-6510LV) microscopy. Bar, 5 µm.

Ultrastructural morphology of trophozoites revealed the typical features of eukaryotic cells (Schuster, 1963). Ancestral proteins related to centrioles have recently been identified (Fritz-Laylin & Cande, 2010). The cytoplasmic membrane is approximately 10 nm thick. The cytoplasm contains a large number of free ribosomes, along with ribosomes that are associated with the membranes that form the rough endoplasmic reticulum. The cytoplasm also contains a smooth endoplasmic reticulum. Other membranes that are associated with a large number of vesicles and are organized similarly to the Golgi apparatus have been identified. In addition, abundant vacuoles of different sizes, either empty or containing different types of materials, have been observed. The mitochondria of these micro-organisms have a characteristic curved ‘dumb-bell’ shape. Lysosomes have also been identified using histochemical staining for acid phosphatases (Feldman, 1977). The presence of contractile vacuoles has been reported in several species of Naegleria (Chávez-Munguía et al., 2009).

The most evident organelle is the nucleus because of its conspicuous nucleolus (Fig. 4). The nucleus has a double membrane and a large number of pores, and the outer nuclear membrane has associated ribosomes. When N. fowleri trophozoites are incubated in solutions free of nutrients (saline solution), they can differentiate into transitional flagellates that cannot divide or feed (Fig. 2b). This flagellate differentiation involves a change in the cell shape from the pleomorphic trophozoites to a pear-shaped form with a pair or more flagella at the distal end.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Transmission electron microscopy. Ultrastructural morphology of N. fowleri. Trophozoite cultured in Bacto-casitone medium shows a normal nucleus (N) with a prominent nucleolus (arrowhead). The integrity of the cytoplasmic membrane (arrows) is also observed, and multiple normal mitochondria (M) and vacuoles (V) are shown. EM-910 Zeiss. Bar, 1 µm.

The mature flagellar apparatus has the canonical 9+2 structure and is surrounded by a cytoplasmic membrane sheet (Patterson et al., 1981; Fritz-Laylin & Cande, 2010). Finally, the resistant form of N. fowleri, the cyst, is usually spherical, smooth, double walled and refractive, and measures approximately 20 µm in diameter (Fig. 2c); the wall is composed mainly of polysaccharides (Chávez-Munguía et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2014). The cysts contain pores that are sealed by a thin mucoid layer. During the early stages of cyst formation, elongated mitochondria and an endoplasmic reticulum with widened cisterns are also observed. The material of the cyst wall is synthesized and packaged by the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Once the cyst is mature, its nucleus and nucleolus are less pronounced than they were during the trophozoite stage (Marciano-Cabral, 1988; Chávez-Munguía et al., 2009, 2011).

Epidemiology

The amoeboflagellate N. fowleri has attracted attention because PAM is a rapidly fatal disease. The number of reports worldwide is unclear; some authors have reported 235 cases (De Jonckheere, 2011), whereas others have reported 300 cases (Trabelsi et al., 2012). Unfortunately, only a few epidemiological studies have focussed on determining its geographic distribution (De Jonckheere, 2011, 2014).

The first case of PAM was reported in 1965 in southern Australia, where the patient died of an unknown acute pyogenic meningitis (Fowler & Carter, 1965). Three more patients with a similar medical history were also mentioned. The authors described the presence of amoebic forms distinct from Entamoeba histolytica and similar to FLA (Fowler & Carter, 1965). Although the aetiological agent was not identified by autopsy, later, the scientific community considered that N. fowleri was the aetiological agent (Carter, 1969; Carter et al., 1981; Marciano-Cabral, 1988). After these reports, many cases of PAM were reported in different countries, such as the USA (Butt et al., 1968; Marciano-Cabral & Cabral, 2007; Yoder et al., 2010), Australia (Fowler & Carter, 1965; Norton et al., 2010) and the Czech Republic (Cerva & Novak, 1968). A retrospective study of PAM showed that approximately 16 cases were identified using histological samples between 1962 and 1968 (Cerva & Novak, 1968; Cerva et al., 1968; Cerva, 1969).

In 1982, 108 cases were reported in different countries of Europe, Africa, Oceania and America (John, 1982). Almost all of the cases have been mainly reported from the USA and Europe; however, the disease has spread to all of the continents except Antarctica (Valenzuela et al., 1984; Lares-Villa et al., 1993; Cogo et al., 2004; Cubero-Menéndez & Cubero-Rego, 2004; Hara & Fukuma, 2005; Jaffar-Bandjee et al., 2005; De Jonckheere, 2011; Siddiqui & Khan, 2014). The first case in Mexico was reported in 1989 in Baja California (López-Corella et al., 1989). Since then, more than 30 cases of PAM have been reported in this country (Valenzuela et al., 1984; López-Corella et al., 1989; Lares-Villa et al., 1993; Lares-Villa, 2001; Lares-Villa & Hernández-Peña, 2010).

Recently, several clinical cases of PAM have been reported in Pakistan. These cases were not related to recreational swimming but rather to performing ablutions (Shakoor et al., 2011). In other work, it was reported that 38 % of domestic water samples were positive for pathogenic FLA, of which 30 % contained Acanthamoeba spp. and only 8 % had N. fowleri (Yousuf et al., 2013). Although many PAM cases have been reported in the literature, the incidence of this disease is considered to be underestimated (De Jonckheere, 2011). It is important to note that the epidemiological information consists mainly of clinical and research reports. Therefore, it is believed that more specific and complete epidemiological studies are necessary to determine the rate of N. fowleri infection.

Pathogenesis

N. fowleri causes PAM, an acute, severe and fatal disease in humans. To understand the interplay between the amoeba and its host, several in vivo studies have been conducted (Martinez et al., 1971, 1973; Jarolim et al., 2000; Rojas-Hernández et al., 2004; Cervantes-Sandoval et al., 2008a), in which the mouse is the most common animal model used to study the different stages of PAM. The process of N. fowleri invasion through the neuroepithelium was described in 1973. Transmission electron microscopic studies showed that N. fowleri trophozoites cross through the intercellular junctions of sustentacular cells to reach the olfactory nerve plexus, moving through the mesaxonal spaces of the Schwann cells. This invasion occurs without causing an inflammatory reaction (Martinez et al., 1971, 1973). Investigations of the early stages of PAM demonstrated that 1 h after instillation of the amoebae, they interacted with the mucus present in the nasal cavity and that, at 6 h post-inoculation, the trophozoites were surrounded by an acute inflammatory reaction, mainly consisting of neutrophils (Cervantes-Sandoval et al., 2008a); however, this innate response appeared to be insufficient to eliminate N. fowleri. Then, at 12 h post-inoculation, the amoebae attached to and penetrated the olfactory neuroepithelium (Rojas-Hernández et al., 2004; Cervantes-Sandoval et al., 2008a; Shibayama et al., 2013). Furthermore, at 30 h post-infection, trophozoites were found in the cribriform plate, and at 48–72 h post-infection, amoebae reached the OBs without causing an inflammatory reaction (Jarolim et al., 2000; Rojas-Hernández et al., 2004). At 102 h post-infection, a severe inflammatory focus consisting of eosinophils and neutrophils was observed, and the number of trophozoites in the OBs was increased. Finally, during the later stages of infection (5–7 days), extensive areas of lytic necrosis and haemorrhaging were observed, and red blood cells were found within the amoebae, suggesting that erythrophagocytosis had occurred (Rivera-Aguilar et al., 2000) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Histopathology of the OBs infected with N. fowleri (mouse model). (a) Sections of OBs 6 days after instillation with the amoebae (arrows). Trophozoites appear to be ingested erythrocytes (arrowheads); lytic necrosis is also seen (N). Magnification, ×40. (b) Important inflammatory reaction is observed (IR). Amoebae are observed inside the inflammation areas (arrowheads). Magnification, ×60.

Mechanisms of pathogenicity

One of the first events that occurs during pathogen invasion is adhesion. Much effort has been exerted to identify the specific adhesion molecules of N. fowleri. For example, an integrin-like protein of 60 kDa was found in its outer membrane (Han et al., 2004). Recently, the capacity of N. fowleri to bind to extracellular proteins, such as collagen type I, fibronectin and laminin-I, was evaluated. Interestingly, the authors demonstrated that N. fowleri and Naegleria lovaniensis (a non-pathogenic amoeba) expressed a differential pattern of adhesion (Jamerson et al., 2012). Another in vitro study demonstrated the differential carbohydrate expression of N. fowleri and N. gruberi (Cervantes-Sandoval et al., 2010). These findings were supported by those of Carrasco-Yepez et al. (2013), who reported that mannose residues are essential for N. fowleri to adhere to mouse nasal mucosa.

Proteases play crucial roles in parasite biology and pathogenesis. Although N. fowleri is not considered a strict parasite, proteases are involved in PAM progression. One of the first reports of its protease activity was published by Martinez et al. (1971), in which the authors proposed that ‘the destruction and lysis of the olfactory epithelium may occur from yet-to-be-defined cytolytic substances produced by amoebae’. Another report describing the secretion of proteolytic enzymes was published by Chang (1979). Herein, the author reported that pathogenic Naegleria degraded sphingomyelin that was attributed to its phospholipolytic enzymes. Three years later, phospholipases were identified in amoebic secretion products (Hysmith & Franson, 1982). During the same year, studies of isoenzyme expression revealed the presence of phosphatase and leucine aminopeptidase (De Jonckheere, 1982). The first isolated and partially characterized protease released by N. fowleri is a member of the cysteine protease family. This protease, which has an MW of 30 kDa, has a cytopathic effect on BHK cells. This degradative effect was abrogated by Z-Phe-Ala fluoromethyl ketone, an irreversible cysteine protease inhibitor (Aldape et al., 1994). Other important proteolytic proteins include the naegleriapores A and B (N-A and N-B), which are toxic to human cells. During the biochemical processing of N-A and N-B, the participation of cysteine proteases was essential (Herbst et al., 2002).

In 2004, two groups of researchers demonstrated the presence of cysteine proteolytic activities in both total crude extracts and the secretion products of N. fowleri using gelatin zymograms. However, the specific substrate was not identified, and it was not possible to correlate these activities with PAM development (Mat Amin, 2004; Tiewcharoen et al., 2004). Another study showed the presence of a differential pattern of degradation between N. fowleri and N. gruberi in total crude extracts and in the conditioned medium. The authors found mainly cysteine proteases and small amounts of serine proteases in N. fowleri (Serrano-Luna et al., 2007). The same group demonstrated a mucinase activity in total crude extracts of N. fowleri (Cervantes-Sandoval et al., 2008b). Recently, cathepsin B and cathepsin-B-like cysteine proteases have been cloned and purified. These proteases can degrade a variety of human substrates, such as IgA, IgG, IgM, collagen, fibronectin, haemoglobin and albumin (Lee et al., 2014). Considering all of these findings, the proteases of N. fowleri might be excellent targets of chemotherapeutic agents directed against this pathogen (Klemba & Goldberg, 2002; Sajid & McKerrow, 2002; McKerrow et al., 2008).

Other important pathogenic mechanisms that are associated with the capacity of N. fowleri to invade the CNS are the active locomotion (Fulton, 1977) and phagocytosis of various host cells, including erythrocytes, microglial and neuroblastoma cells (Marciano-Cabral & John, 1983; Alonso & Zubiaur, 1985). Recently, Nf-actin was associated with phagocytosis (Lee et al., 2007). This protein was localized mainly in phagosome-cup structures (amoebostomes) and in the cytoplasm and pseudopodia during phagocytosis (Sohn et al., 2010). Similarly, contact-independent lysis triggered by N. fowleri trophozoites has been reported (Kim et al., 2008b). This lysis was performed in a non-contact system, and the results showed morphological changes, such as cell membrane destruction and a reduction in the number of human microglial cells, due to the secretion of N. fowleri proteins. Moreover, a significant increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells (16 %) was observed in the non-contact system compared with that in N. fowleri lysates (Kim et al., 2008b). Another important molecule described is Nf-cHSP70: the biological roles of this protein are not clear, but it is thought that it may protect amoebae from environmental damage, particularly that caused by high temperatures. Likewise, Nf-cHSP70 has been associated with the pathogenicity and proliferation of N. fowleri (Song et al., 2007 , 2008). Additionally, N. fowleri utilizes mechanisms to evade the immune response, such as capping formation, and this strategy is sufficient for evading immunoglobulins (IgA and IgG) (Shibayama et al., 2003). N. fowleri can also avoid complement-mediated lysis, a property that has been associated with the presence of a ‘CD59-like’ molecule (Ferrante & Thong, 1979). All of the molecules and mechanisms described above have been correlated with the capacity of N. fowleri to produce damage. Investigations of this amoeba conducted by different groups throughout the world can contribute to a better understanding of the physiopathology of PAM and improve the management and treatment of this devastating CNS infection.

Clinical features

The typical symptoms of PAM appear during the first week after infection with N. fowleri trophozoites. There are no distinctive clinical features to differentiate PAM from other types of meningitis. Therefore, it is very important that physicians obtain a detailed clinical history of the patients (Jain et al., 2002; Naqi & Azeemuddin, 2013). The earliest symptoms include severe headache, a high fever and neck stiffness, followed by anorexia, vomiting, irritability, photophobia and neurological abnormalities, including diplopia, lethargy, seizures and coma. Cranial nerve palsies may indicate brain oedema (Trabelsi et al., 2012; Budge et al., 2013). Death occurs between the third and seventh days after symptom onset (Valenzuela et al., 1984; Yoder et al., 2012). Autopsies of PAM patients have revealed brain inflammation with severe tissue damage throughout the area of invasion, with ulceration of the olfactory mucosa and necrosis of the olfactory nerves (Sugita et al., 1999; Visvesvara, 2013). Microscopically, the OBs were almost completely disorganized by fibrin-purulent exudates and by haemorrhaging from necrotic blood vessels, and the adjacent frontal cortex exhibited the invasion of a considerable number of amoebae (Hannisch & Hallagan, 1997).

Diagnosis

To develop an appropriate therapy for the rapidly fatal PAM, accurate and early diagnosis is necessary because PAM is often misdiagnosed as was previously mentioned (Da Rocha-Azevedo et al., 2009). Therefore, it is imperative to perform a complete and precise clinical history. Physicians should obtain information regarding any recent patient contact with freshwater, including hot springs, and data regarding rhinitis, allergies and other diseases of the upper respiratory tract.

Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brains of patients with PAM showed multifocal parenchymal lesions, pseudotumoural lesions, meningeal exudates, haemorrhagic infarcts and necrosis in the brain. In addition, Kidney & Kim (1998) reported oedema and hydrocephalus in patients with PAM. However, these methodologies cannot differentiate among cases of meningitis with different aetiologies. A correct and prompt diagnosis can be reached by a microscopic examination of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to detect motile trophozoites. The colour of the CSF of a PAM patient may range from greyish to yellowish-white, and the CSF is sometimes tinged red due to the presence of a few erythrocytes (250 cells mm−3). However, the red blood cell count increases during the later stages of the disease (24 600 cells mm−3) (Visvesvara et al., 2007).

The microscopic examination of the CSF can be supported by staining using Giemsa, haematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff and Wright stains. However, the Gram stain is not useful in identifying Naegleria trophozoites (Martinez & Visvesvara, 1997; CDC, 2013). Under the microscope, N. fowleri trophozoites exhibit a typical amoeboid form. To corroborate this morphological observation, it is necessary to perform differential identification using the flagellation test (FT). To perform the FT, the CSF is incubated in an isotonic saline solution for 2 h. The FT is a useful tool because other amoeboid species, such as E. histolytica, Acanthamoeba spp., Sapinnia spp. and B. mandrillaris, can also infect the CNS. Some N. fowleri isolates are poorly flagellated under laboratory conditions, causing their misidentification (Behets et al., 2003). In this case, immunofluorescence techniques or ELISAs using specific antibodies can be used to reach the proper diagnosis (Martinez & Visvesvara, 1997). Different modalities of the PCR (real-time, nested and multiplex PCR) can also be employed in clinical diagnostic and research laboratories. Sensitive PCR assays to detect the presence of N. fowleri in clinical and environmental samples with high specificity have been utilized (Réveiller et al., 2002). A nested-PCR assay has been developed to detect N. fowleri amoebae in environmental samples. This method is based on the amplification of a 166 bp fragment of the Mp2Cl5 gene, which is related to the virulence of the amoeba (Réveiller et al., 2002; Maclean et al., 2004).

Other researchers developed an ITS-based PCR assay that allows the identification of Naegleria spp. (Pélandakis et al., 2000; Hara & Fukuma, 2005; Robinson et al., 2006; Madarová et al., 2010). To improve the clinical diagnosis, a multiplex real-time PCR assay using probes specific for 18S rRNA has been developed, which allows the simultaneous detection of N. fowleri, B. mandrillaris and Acanthamoeba in the same sample (Qvarnstrom et al., 2009). However, despite the development of various sensitive PCR assays, they cannot be widely applied, and most clinical cases are confirmed by post-mortem biopsies employing haematoxylin and eosin staining (Martinez & Visvesvara, 1991). Another procedure for identifying N. fowleri trophozoites is culturing CSF samples in nutritive agars to obtain axenic cultures of amoebae (Carter, 1970). More recently, it has been proposed that a diagnosis could bemade by recovering motile trophozoites from the nasal cavity by washing it with a saline solution (Baig & Khan, 2015).

Treatment

It is important to highlight that an appropriate diagnosis is the key to choosing an appropriate treatment. However, PAM is not commonly confirmed during the early stages of infection, and most people infected with this organism die. Because of the high mortality rate, more effective drugs are urgently needed. Drug discovery research has improved since the first report of PAM (Fowler & Carter, 1965; Carter, 1969; Rice et al., 2015). In 1969, Carter employed several drugs; he found that only amphotericin B (AmB) had an amoebicidal effect in vitro and a protective effect in vivo (Carter, 1969). Since then, AmB has been employed alone or in combination with other drugs to the treatment of PAM (Table 1). The effect of AmB on Naegleria was corroborated by Schuster & Rechthand (1975). They reported that the effects of AmB differed depending on the stage of the cultures, observing an amoebicidal effect during the lag phase and a proliferation-inhibitory effect during the log phase (Schuster & Rechthand, 1975). It is important to note that the AmB does not specifically target against N. fowleri. The biochemical mechanism underlying the effect of AmB involves lysis of the cell membrane, specifically through interaction with sterols in the membrane, even those of human cells (and more efficiently through interaction with ergosterol in fungal cells) (Brajtburg & Bolard, 1996), which is why AmB is considered toxic, mainly causing renal toxicity. AmB is generally employed at low concentrations for the treatment of fungal infections. However, clinical doses in the range 0.25–1.5 mg kg−1 day−1 have been employed to treat PAM (Apley et al., 1970; Poungvarin & Jariya, 1991; Tiphine et al., 1999).

Table 1.

Clinical reports of PAM associated with AmB treatment

Authors Year Treatment Study
Apley et al. 1970 AmB, sulphadiazine Clinical report
Duma et al. 1971 AmB Clinical report
Anderson & Jamieson 1972 AmB Clinical report
Brown 1991 AmB Clinical report
Poungvarin & Jariya 1991 AmB, rifampicin, ketoconazole Clinical report
Loschiavo et al. 1993 AmB Clinical report
Wang et al. 1993 AmB, rifampicin, chloramphenicol Clinical report
Jain et al. 2002 AmB, rifampicin and ornidazole Clinical report
Vargas-Zepeda et al. 2005 AmB, dexamethasone, fluconazole, rifampicin Clinical report
Yadav et al. 2013 AmB, rifampicin, fluconazole Clinical report
Sood et al. 2014 AmB, rifampicin, fluconazole Clinical report
Sharma et al. 2015 AmB Clinical report
Linam et al. 2015 AmB, rifampin, fluconazole, azithromycin, miltefosine, dexamethasone Clinical report
Cope et al. 2016 AmB, rifampin, fluconazole, azithromycin, miltefosine, dexamethasone Clinical report

The first report of clinical cases of humans for whom AmB was employed to treat PAM appeared in 1970 (Apley et al., 1970). In this report, three cases involving children in Great Britain were reported. One of the cases was fatal, despite early diagnosis and treatment, whereas the treatment was successful for the other two patients. However, one of the patients was initially diagnosed with a severe sore throat and was treated with oral penicillin. Subsequently, pyogenic meningitis was diagnosed, and the treatment was changed to intravenous administration of AmB at a dose of 0.25–1 mg kg−1 plus sulphadiazine at a dose of 750 mg kg−1. Unfortunately, the patient died approximately 2 weeks after admission. In contrast, the other two patients were treated with the same regimen of AmB and sulphadiazine but not with penicillin. They had a complete symptom-free recovery (Apley et al., 1970). Later, AmB was continuously employed during the treatment of PAM, even when used in combination with other drugs. In 2002, a 26-year-old female was diagnosed with PAM and was treated with AmB at a dosage of 1 mg kg−1 daily, rifampicin at 450 mg kg−1 daily and ornidazole at a dosage of 1500 mg day−1 until she recovered completely, which took 3 weeks (Jain et al., 2002). To date, AmB is the antibiotic for which there is the most clinical evidence of the successful treatment of humans with PAM. However, only 15 cases of recovery have been reported worldwide (Apley et al., 1970; Duma et al., 1971; Anderson & Jamieson, 1972; Brown, 1991; Poungvarin & Jariya, 1991; Loschiavo et al., 1993; Wang et al., 1993; Jain et al., 2002; Vargas-Zepeda et al., 2005; Yadav et al., 2013; Sood et al., 2014; Linam et al., 2015; Sharma et al., 2015; Cope et al., 2016). Recently, an investigational breast cancer and anti-Leishmania drug, miltefosine (Dorlo et al., 2012; Kaur et al., 2015), has shown promise when used in combination with other drugs, and a PAM patient was successfully treated using miltefosine and hypothermia; however, the patient suffered permanent brain damage (Cope et al., 2016). Because of the toxicity of AmB and the low rate of recovery from PAM (5 %), researchers are interested in finding new and more effective treatments for this disease. Additionally, some adjunctive therapies have been employed in the treatment of PAM such as the use of anti-inflammatory agents (e.g. dexamethasone) and non-pharmacological procedures like CSF drainage, hyperosmolar therapy, moderate hyperventilation and hypothermia (Cope et al., 2016). Some of the studies aimed at finding novel therapeutic drugs focussed on compounds such as acrolein, isoflavans, rokitomicin, miltefosine/chlorpromazine, corifungin and certain amidino derivatives that showed amoebicidal effects in Naegleria cultures and conferred protection in a mouse model (Zhang et al., 1988; Belofsky et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2008a, c; Debnath et al., 2012; Rice et al., 2015).

Conclusion

PAM is an acute and fatal disease that has recently become more common in both developed and underdeveloped countries. The number of PAM cases may increase due to global warming, global overpopulation and increased industrial activities. It is urgent that the health community, including medical and diagnostic laboratory technicians, be aware of this disease in order to make timely diagnosis that could save patients’ lives. The knowledge of the biology and pathogenesis of N. fowleri in the past 50 years could be used to make faster diagnosis and design new drugs against specific targets to eliminate the amoeba and increase the survival of the patients.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Angélica Silva-Olivares for her technical assistance in obtaining the transmission and scanning electron microscopy images of N. fowleri. This study was supported by CONACyT grant number 237523.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AmB, amphotericin B; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; FLA, free-living amoeba; FT, flagellation test; OB, olfactory bulb; PAM, primary amoebic meningoencephalitis.

References

  1. Adl S. M., Simpson A. G., Farmer M. A., Andersen R. A., Anderson O. R., Barta J. R., Bowser S. S., Brugerolle G., Fensome R. A., et al. The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005;52:399–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldape K., Huizinga H., Bouvier J., McKerrow J. Naegleria fowleri: characterization of a secreted histolytic cysteine protease. Exp Parasitol. 1994;78:230–241. doi: 10.1006/expr.1994.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso P., Zubiaur E. Phagocytic activity of three Naegleria strains in the presence of erythrocytes of various types. J Protozool. 1985;32:661–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1985.tb03097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson K., Jamieson A. Agglutination test for the investigation of the genus Naegleria . Pathology. 1972;4:273–278. doi: 10.3109/00313027209068953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Apley J., Clarke S. K., Roome A. P., Sandry S. A., Saygi G., Silk B., Warhurst D. C. Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis in Britain. Br Med J. 1970;1:596–599. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5696.596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baig A. M., Khan N. A. Tackling infection owing to brain-eating amoeba. Acta Trop. 2015;142:86–88. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Behets J., Seghi F., Declerck P., Verelst L., Duvivier L., Van Damme A., Ollevier F. Detection of Naegleria spp. and Naegleria fowleri: a comparison of flagellation tests, ELISA and PCR. Water Sci Technol. 2003;47:117–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Belofsky G., Carreno R., Goswick S. M., John D. T. Activity of isoflavans of Dalea aurea (Fabaceae) against the opportunistic amoeba Naegleria fowleri . Planta Med. 2006;72:383–386. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brajtburg J., Bolard J. Carrier effects on biological activity of amphotericin B. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:512–531. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.4.512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown R. L. Successful treatment of primary amebic meningoencephalitis. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1201–1202. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400060121021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Budge P. J., Lazensky B., Van Zile K. W., Elliott K. E., Dooyema C. A., Visvesvara G. S., Beach M. J., Yoder J. S. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis in Florida: a case report and epidemiological review of Florida cases. J Environ Health. 2013;75:26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Butt C. G., Baro C., Knorr R. W. Naegleria (sp.) identified in amebic encephalitis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1968;50:568–574. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/50.5.568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Investigational drug available directly from CDC for the treatment of infections with free-living amoebae. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62:666. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carrasco-Yepez M., Campos-Rodriguez R., Godinez-Victoria M., Rodriguez-Monroy M. A., Jarillo-Luna A., Bonilla-Lemus P., De Oca A. C., Rojas-Hernandez S. Naegleria fowleri glycoconjugates with residues of alpha-D-mannose are involved in adherence of trophozoites to mouse nasal mucosa. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3615–3625. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3549-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carter R. F. Sensitivity to amphotericin B of a Naegleria sp. isolated from a case of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis. J Clin Pathol. 1969;22:470–474. doi: 10.1136/jcp.22.4.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carter R. F. Description of a Naegleria sp. isolated from two cases of primary amoebic meningo-encephalitis, and of the experimental pathological changes induced by it. J Pathol. 1970;100:217–244. doi: 10.1002/path.1711000402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carter R. F., Cullity G. J., Ojeda V. J., Silberstein P., Willaert E. A fatal case of meningoencephalitis due to a free-living amoeba of uncertain identity – probably Acanthamoeba sp. Pathology. 1981;13:51–68. doi: 10.3109/00313028109086829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cavalier-Smith T., Fiore-Donno A. M., Chao E., Kudryavtsev A., Berney C., Snell E. A., Lewis R. Multigene phylogeny resolves deep branching of Amoebozoa. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;83:293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cerva L. Amoebic meningoencephalitis: axenic culture of Naegleria . Science. 1969;163:576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cerva L., Novak K. Amoebic meningoencephalitis: 16 fatalities. Science. 1968;160:92. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3823.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cerva L., Novak K., Culbertson C. G. An outbreak of acute, fatal amebic meningoencephalitis. Am J Epidemiol. 1968;88:436–444. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cervantes-Sandoval I., Serrano-Luna J., Garcia-Latorre E., Tsutsumi V., Shibayama M. Characterization of brain inflammation during primary amoebic meningoencephalitis. Parasitol Int. 2008a;57:307–313. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cervantes-Sandoval I., Serrano-Luna J., Garcia-Latorre E., Tsutsumi V., Shibayama M. Mucins in the host defence against Naegleria fowleri and mucinolytic activity as a possible means of evasion. Microbiology. 2008b;154:3895–3904. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/019380-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cervantes-Sandoval I., Serrano-Luna J., Pacheco-Yépez J., Silva-Olivares A., Tsutsumi V., Shibayama M. Differences between Naegleria fowleri and Naegleria gruberi in expression of mannose and fucose glycoconjugates. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:695–701. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1727-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chang S. L. Pathogenesis of pathogenic Naegleria amoeba. Folia Parasitol. 1979;26:195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chávez-Munguía B., Omaña-Molina M., Castañón G., Bonilla P., González-Lázaro M., Hernández-Martínez D., Salazar-Villatoro L., Esparza-García A., Martínez-Palomo A., Ortega-Pierres G. Ultrastructural study of the encystation and excystation processes in Naegleria sp. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2009;56:66–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chávez-Munguía B., Segovia-Gamboa N., Salazar-Villatoro L., Omaña-Molina M., Espinosa-Cantellano M., Martínez-Palomo A. Naegleria fowleri: enolase is expressed during cyst differentiation. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2011;58:463–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cogo P. E., Scagli M., Gatti S., Rossetti F., Alaggio R., Laverda A. M., Zhou L., Xiao L., Visvesvara G. S. Fatal Naegleria fowleri meningoencephalitis, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1835–1837. doi: 10.3201/eid1010.040273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cope J. R., Conrad D. A., Cohen N., Cotilla M., DaSilva A., Jackson J., Visvesvara G. S. Use of the novel therapeutic agent miltefosine for the treatment of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis: report of 1 fatal and 1 surviving case. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:774–776. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cubero-Menéndez O., Cubero-Rego D. Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis: a case report. Rev Neurol. 2004;38:336–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. da Rocha-Azevedo B., Tanowitz H. B., Marciano-Cabral F. Diagnosis of infections caused by pathogenic free-living amoebae. Interdis PerspectInfect Dis. 2009;2009:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2009/251406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. De Jonckheere J. F. Isoenzyme patterns of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Naegleria spp. using agarose isoelectricfocusing. Ann Microbiol. 1982;133:319–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. De Jonckheere J. F. Molecular definition and the ubiquity of species in the genus Naegleria . Protist. 2004;155:89–103. doi: 10.1078/1434461000167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. De Jonckheere J. F. Origin and evolution of the worldwide distributed pathogenic amoeboflagellate Naegleria fowleri . Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:1520–1528. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. De Jonckheere J. F. The impact of man on the occurrence of the pathogenic free-living amoeboflagellate Naegleria fowleri . Future Microbiol. 2012;7:5–7. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. De Jonckheere J. F. What do we know by now about the genus Naegleria? Exp Parasitol. 2014;145:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2014.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Debnath A., Tunac J. B., Galindo-Gomez S., Silva-Olivares A., Shibayama M., McKerrow J. H. Corifungin, a new drug lead against Naegleria, identified from a high-throughput screen. Antimicrobial Agen Chemother. 2012;56:5450–5457. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00643-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Diaz J. H., Boudreaux J. P. Emerging trends in free-living amebic infections of the brain: implications for organ transplantation. J La State Med Soc. 2013;165:314–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Dorlo T. P., Balasegaram M., Beijnen J. H., De Vries P. J. Miltefosine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of leishmaniasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:2576–2597. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Duma R. J., Rosenblum W. I., McGehee R. F., Jones M. M., Nelson E. C. Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis caused by Naegleria. Two new cases, response to amphotericin B, and a review. Ann Intern Med. 1971;74:923–931. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-74-6-923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dyková I., Kyselová I., Pecková H., Oborník M., Lukes J. Identity of Naegleria strains isolated from organs of freshwater fishes. Dis Aquat Organ. 2001;46:115–121. doi: 10.3354/dao046115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Feldman M. R. Naegleria fowleri: fine structural localization of acid phosphatase and heme proteins. Exp Parasitol. 1977;41:283–289. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(77)90102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ferrante A., Thong Y. H. Antibody induced capping and endocytosis of surface antigens in Naegleria fowleri . Int J Parasitol. 1979;9:599–601. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(79)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fowler M., Carter R. F. Acute pyogenic meningitis probably due to Acanthamoeba sp.: a preliminary report. Br Med J. 1965;2:740–742. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5464.734-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fritz-Laylin L. K., Cande W. Z. Ancestral centriole and flagella proteins identified by analysis of Naegleria differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:4024–4031. doi: 10.1242/jcs.077453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fritz-Laylin L. K., Prochnik S. E., Ginger M. L., Dacks J. B., Carpenter M. L., Field M. C., Kuo A., Paredez A., Chapman J., et al. The genome of Naegleria gruberi illuminates early eukaryotic versatility. Cell. 2010;140:631–642. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Fritz-Laylin L. K., Ginger M. L., Walsh C., Dawson S. C., Fulton C. The Naegleria genome: a free-living microbial eukaryote lends unique insights into core eukaryotic cell biology. Res Microbiol. 2011;162:607–618. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fulton C. Intracellular regulation of cell shape and motility in Naegleria. First insights and a working hypothesis. J Supramol Struct. 1977;6:13–43. doi: 10.1002/jss.400060103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Han K. L., Lee H. J., Shin M. H., Shin H. J., Im K. I., Park S. J. The involvement of an integrin-like protein and protein kinase C in amoebic adhesion to fibronectin and amoebic cytotoxicity. Parasitol Res. 2004;94:53–60. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hannisch W., Hallagan L. F. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis: a review of the clinical literature. WildEnviron Med. 1997;8:211–213. doi: 10.1580/1080-6032(1997)008[0211:PAMARO]2.3.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hara T., Fukuma T. Diagnosis of the primary amoebic meningoencephalitis due to Naegleria fowleri . Parasitol Int. 2005;54:219–221. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Heggie T. W. Swimming with death: Naegleria fowleri infections in recreational waters. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2010;8:201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Herbst R., Ott C., Jacobs T., Marti T., Marciano-Cabral F., Leippe M. Pore-forming polypeptides of the pathogenic protozoon Naegleria fowleri . J Biol Chem. 2002;277:22353–22360. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201475200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hysmith R. M., Franson R. C. Elevated levels of cellular and extracellular phospholipases from pathogenic Naegleria fowleri . Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982;711:26–32. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(82)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jaffar-Bandjee M. C., Alessandri J. L., Molet B., Clouzeau J., Jacquemot L., Sampériz S., Saly J. C. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis: 1st case observed in Madagascar. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2005;98:11–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jain R., Prabhakar S., Modi M., Bhatia R., Sehgal R. Naegleria meningitis: a rare survival. Neurol India. 2002;50:470–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Jamerson M., Da Rocha-Azevedo B., Cabral G. A., Marciano-Cabral F. Pathogenic Naegleria fowleri and non-pathogenic Naegleria lovaniensis exhibit differential adhesion to, and invasion of, extracellular matrix proteins. Microbiology. 2012;158:791–803. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055020-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Jarolim K. L., McCosh J. K., Howard M. J., John D. T. A light microscopy study of the migration of Naegleria fowleri from the nasal submucosa to the central nervous system during the early stage of primary amebic meningoencephalitis in mice. J Parasitol. 2000;86:50–55. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0050:ALMSOT]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. John D. T. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis and the biology of Naegleria fowleri . Ann Rev Microbiol. 1982;36:101–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.36.100182.000533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kaur H., Seifert K., Hawkes G. E., Coumbarides G. S., Alvar J., Croft S. L. Chemical and bioassay techniques to authenticate quality of the anti-leishmanial drug miltefosine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:31–38. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kidney D. D., Kim S. H. CNS infections with free-living amebas: neuroimaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:809–812. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim J. H., Jung S. Y., Lee Y. J., Song K. J., Kwon D., Kim K., Park S., Im K. I., Shin H. J. Effect of therapeutic chemical agents in vitro and on experimental meningoencephalitis due to Naegleria fowleri . Antimicrob Agen Chemother. 2008a;52:4010–4016. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00197-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim J. H., Kim D., Shin H. J. Contact-independent cell death of human microglial cells due to pathogenic Naegleria fowleri trophozoites. Korean J Parasitol. 2008b;46:217–221. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2008.46.4.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kim J. H., Lee Y. J., Sohn H. J., Song K. J., Kwon D., Kwon M. H., Im K. I., Shin H. J. Therapeutic effect of rokitamycin in vitro and on experimental meningoencephalitis due to Naegleria fowleri . Int J Antimicrob Agen. 2008c;32:411–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Klemba M., Goldberg D. E. Biological roles of proteases in parasitic protozoa. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:275–305. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.090501.145453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kyle D. E., Noblet G. P. Vertical distribution of potentially pathogenic free-living amoebae in freshwater lakes. J Protozool. 1985;32:99–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1985.tb03022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kyle D. E., Noblet G. P. Seasonal distribution of thermotolerant free-living amoebae. II. Lake Issaqueena. J Protozool. 1987;34:10–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1987.tb03122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lares-Villa F., De Jonckheere J. F., De Moura H., Rechi-Iruretagoyena A., Ferreira-Guerrero E., Fernandez-Quintanilla G., Ruiz-Matus C., Visvesvara G. S. Five cases of primary amebic meningoencephalitis in Mexicali, Mexico: study of the isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:685–688. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.685-688.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lares-Villa F. Proceedings IXth International Meeting on the Biology and Pathogenicity of Free-Living Amoebae. Paris, France: John Libbey Eurotext; 2001. Free-living amoebae infections in Mexico. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lares-Villa F., Hernández-Peña C. Concentration of Naegleria fowleri in natural waters used for recreational purposes in Sonora, Mexico (November 2007–October 2008) Exp Parasitol. 2010;126:33–36. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Lee J., Kim J. H., Sohn H. J., Yang H. J., Na B. K., Chwae Y. J., Park S., Kim K., Shin H. J. Novel cathepsin B and cathepsin B-like cysteine protease of Naegleria fowleri excretory-secretory proteins and their biochemical properties. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2765–2776. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3936-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Lee Y. J., Kim J. H., Jeong S. R., Song K. J., Kim K., Park S., Park M. S., Shin H. J. Production of Nfa1-specific monoclonal antibodies that influences the in vitro cytotoxicity of Naegleria fowleri trophozoites on microglial cells. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:1191–1196. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0600-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Levine N. D., Corliss J. O., Cox F. E., Deroux G., Grain J., Honigberg B. M., Leedale G. F., Loeblich A. R., Lom J., et al. A newly revised classification of the protozoa. J Protozool. 1980;27:37–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1980.tb04228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Linam W. M., Ahmed M., Cope J. R., Chu C., Visvesvara G. S., Da Silva A. J., Qvarnstrom Y., Green J. Successful treatment of an adolescent with Naegleria fowleri primary amebic meningoencephalitis. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e744. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Loschiavo F., Ventura-Spagnolo T., Sessa E., Bramanti P. Acute primary meningoencephalitis from Naegleria fowleri: report of a clinical case with a favourable outcome. Acta Neurol. 1993;15:333–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. López-Corella E., De León B., De Jonckheere J. F. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis caused by Naegleria fowleri in an adolescent from Huetamo, Michoacan, Mexico. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1989;46:619–622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Maclean R. C., Richardson D. J., LePardo R., Marciano-Cabral F. The identification of Naegleria fowleri from water and soil samples by nested PCR. Parasitol Res. 2004;93:211–217. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1104-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Madarová L., Trnková K., Feiková S., Klement C., Obernauerová M. A real-time PCR diagnostic method for detection of Naegleria fowleri . Exp Parasitol. 2010;126:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Marciano-Cabral F., John D. T. Cytopathogenicity of Naegleria fowleri for rat neuroblastoma cell cultures: scanning electron microscopy study. Infect Immun. 1983;40:1214–1217. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.3.1214-1217.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Marciano-Cabral F. Biology of Naegleria spp. Microbiol Rev. 1988;52:114–133. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.114-133.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Marciano-Cabral F., Cabral G. A. The immune response to Naegleria fowleri amebae and pathogenesis of infection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;51:243–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Martinez A. J., Nelson E. C., Jones M. M., Duma R. J., Rosenblum W. I. Experimental Naegleria meningoencephalitis in mice. An electron microscope study. Lab Invest. 1971;25:465–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Martinez A. J., Visvesvara G. S. Laboratory diagnosis of pathogenic free-living amoebas: Naegleria, Acanthamoeba, and Leptomyxid . Clin Lab Med. 1991;11:861–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Martinez A. J., Visvesvara G. S. Free-living, amphizoic and opportunistic amebas. Brain Pathol. 1997;7:583–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1997.tb01076.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Martinez J., Duma R. J., Nelson E. C., Moretta F. L. Experimental naegleria meningoencephalitis in mice. Penetration of the olfactory mucosal epithelium by Naegleria and pathologic changes produced: a light and electron microscope study. Lab Invest. 1973;29:121–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Martínez-Castillo M., Ramírez-Rico G., Serrano-Luna J., Shibayama M. Iron-binding protein degradation by cysteine proteases of Naegleria fowleri . Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:416712–416718. doi: 10.1155/2015/416712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mat Amin N. Proteinases in Naegleria fowleri (strain NF3), a pathogenic amoeba: a preliminary study. Trop Biomed. 2004;21:57–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. McKerrow J. H., Rosenthal P. J., Swenerton R., Doyle P. Development of protease inhibitors for protozoan infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:668–672. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328315cca9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mishra B. B., Gundra U. M., Teale J. M. Toll-like receptors in CNS parasitic infections. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;336:83–104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00549-7_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Naqi R., Azeemuddin M. Naeglaeria infection of the central nervous system, CT scan findings: a case series. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63:399–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Norton R., Harris P., Ryan P., Simpson S. Another killer of the Australian bush: a rapidly fatal meningoencephalitis in a child. Clin Infect Dis . 2010;50:1422–1424. doi: 10.1086/652146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Pantchev N., Tappe D. Pentastomiasis and other parasitic zoonoses from reptiles and amphibians. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2011;124:528–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Patterson M., Woodworth T. W., Marciano-Cabral F., Bradley S. G. Ultrastructure of Naegleria fowleri enflagellation. J Bacteriol. 1981;147:217–226. doi: 10.1128/jb.147.1.217-226.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Poungvarin N., Jariya P. The fifth nonlethal case of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis. J Med Assoc Thai. 1991;74:112–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Pélandakis M., Serre S., Pernin P. Analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacers in Naegleria spp. and in N. fowleri . J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2000;47:116–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Qvarnstrom Y., Da Silva A. J., Schuster F. L., Gelman B. B., Visvesvara G. S. Molecular confirmation of Sappinia pedata as a causative agent of amoebic encephalitis. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:1139–1142. doi: 10.1086/597473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Rice C. A., Colon B. L., Alp M., Goker H., Boykin D. W., Kyle D. E. Bis-Benzimidazole hits against Naegleria fowleri discovered with new high-throughput screens. Antimicrob Agen Chemother. 2015;59:2037–2044. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05122-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rivera-Aguilar V., Hernández-Martínez D., Rojas-Hernández S., Oliver-Aguillón G., Tsutsumi V., Herrera-González N., Campos-Rodríguez R. Immunoblot analysis of IgA antibodies to Naegleria fowleri in human saliva and serum. Parasitol Res. 2000;86:775–780. doi: 10.1007/s004360000243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Robinson B. S., Monis P. T., Dobson P. J. Rapid, sensitive, and discriminating identification of Naegleria spp. by real-time PCR and melting-curve analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5857–5863. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00113-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Rodríguez-Zaragoza S. Ecology of free-living amoebae. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1994;20:225–241. doi: 10.3109/10408419409114556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Rojas-Hernández S., Jarillo-Luna A., Rodríguez-Monroy M., Moreno-Fierros L., Campos-Rodríguez R. Immunohistochemical characterization of the initial stages of Naegleria fowleri meningoencephalitis in mice. Parasitol Res. 2004;94:31–36. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1177-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Réveiller F. L., Cabanes P. A., Marciano-Cabral F. Development of a nested PCR assay to detect the pathogenic free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri . Parasitol Res. 2002;88:443–450. doi: 10.1007/s00436-002-0591-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Sajid M., McKerrow J. H. Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2002;120:1–21. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00438-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Scaglia M., Gatti S., Brustia R., Chichino G., Rondanelli E. G. Phagocytosis of human erythrocytes by Naegleria is not related to species pathogenicity. A phase-contrast cinemicrographic study. Microbiologica. 1991;14:45–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Schuster F. An electron microscope study of the amoebo-flagellate, Naegleria gruberi (Schardinger). I. The amoeboid and flagellate stages. J Protozool. 1963;10:297–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1963.tb01681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Schuster F. L., Rechthand E. In vitro effects of amphotericin B on growth and ultrastructure of the amoeboflagellates Naegleria gruberi and Naegleria fowleri . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975;8:591–605. doi: 10.1128/AAC.8.5.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Schuster F. L., Visvesvara G. S. Free-living amoebae as opportunistic and non-opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:1001–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Serrano-Luna J., Cervantes-Sandoval I., Tsutsumi V., Shibayama M. A biochemical comparison of proteases from pathogenic Naegleria fowleri and non-pathogenic Naegleria gruberi . J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2007;54:411–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2007.00280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Shakoor S., Beg M. A., Mahmood S. F., Bandea R., Sriram R., Noman F., Ali F., Visvesvara G. S., Zafar A. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis caused by Naegleria fowleri, Karachi, Pakistan. EmergInfect Dis. 2011;17:258–261. doi: 10.3201/eid1702.100442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Sharma A., Guleria S. Successful treatment of a case of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis: how important is history taking. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015;19:126–127. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.151024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Shibayama M., Serrano-Luna J., Rojas-Hernández S., Campos-Rodríguez R., Tsutsumi V. Interaction of secretory immunoglobulin A antibodies with Naegleria fowleri trophozoites and collagen type I. Can J Microbiol. 2003;49:164–170. doi: 10.1139/w03-023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Shibayama M., Martínez-Castillo M., Silva-Olivares A., Galindo-Gómez S., Navarro-García F., Escobar-Herrera J., Sabanero M., Tsutsumi V., Serrano-Luna J. Disruption of MDCK cell tight junctions by the free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri . Microbiology. 2013;159:392–401. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.063255-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Siddiqui R., Khan N. A. Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis caused by Naegleria fowleri: an old enemy presenting new challenges. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Sifuentes L. Y., Choate B. L., Gerba C. P., Bright K. R. The occurrence of Naegleria fowleri in recreational waters in Arizona. J Environ Sci Health, Part A. 2014;49:1322–1330. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2014.910342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Simpson A. G. Cytoskeletal organization, phylogenetic affinities and systematics in the contentious taxon Excavata (Eukaryota) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:1759–1777. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02578-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Sohn H. J., Kim J. H., Shin M. H., Song K. J., Shin H. J. The Nf-actin gene is an important factor for food-cup formation and cytotoxicity of pathogenic Naegleria fowleri . Parasitol Res. 2010;106:917–924. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1760-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Song K. J., Song K. H., Na B. K., Kim J. H., Kwon D., Park S., Pak J. H., Im K. I., Shin H. J. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cytosolic heat shock protein 70 from Naegleria fowleri . Parasitol Res. 2007;100:1083–1089. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0404-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Song K. J., Song K. H., Kim J. H., Sohn H. J., Lee Y. J., Park C. E., Shin H. J. Heat shock protein 70 of Naegleria fowleri is important factor for proliferation and in vitro cytotoxicity. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:313–317. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0972-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sood A., Chauhan S., Chandel L., Jaryal S. C. Prompt diagnosis and extraordinary survival from Naegleria fowleri meningitis: a rare case report. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32:193–196. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.129834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Sugita Y., Fujii T., Hayashi I., Aoki T., Yokoyama T., Morimatsu M., Fukuma T., Takamiya Y. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis due to Naegleria fowleri: an autopsy case in Japan. Pathol Int. 1999;49:468–470. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.1999.00893.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Tiewcharoen S., Komalamisra N., Junnu V. Zymogram patterns of Naegleria spp isolated from natural water sources in Taling Chan district, Bangkok. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health. 2004;35:275–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Tiphine M., Letscher-Bru V., Herbrecht R. Amphotericin B and its new formulations: pharmacologic characteristics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability. Transpl Infect Dis. 1999;1:273–283. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3062.1999.010406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Trabelsi H., Dendana F., Sellami A., Sellami H., Cheikhrouhou F., Neji S., Makni F., Ayadi A. Pathogenic free-living amoebae: epidemiology and clinical review. Pathol Biol. 2012;60:399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Tyndall R. L., Domingue E. L. Cocultivation of Legionella pneumophila and free-living amoebae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44:954–959. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.4.954-959.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Valenzuela G., López-Corella E., De Jonckheere J. F. Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis in a young male from northwestern Mexico. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1984;78:558–559. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(84)90084-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Vargas-Zepeda J., Gómez-Alcalá A. V., Vásquez-Morales J. A., Licea-Amaya L., De Jonckheere J. F., Lares-Villa F. Successful treatment of Naegleria fowleri meningoencephalitis by using intravenous amphotericin B, fluconazole and rifampicin. Arch Med Res. 2005;36:83–86. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2004.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Visvesvara G. S., Moura H., Schuster F. L. Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea . FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;50:1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Visvesvara G. S. Infections with free-living amebae. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;114:153–168. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53490-3.00010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang A., Kay R., Poon W. S., Ng H. K. Successful treatment of amoebic meningoencephalitis in a Chinese living in Hong Kong. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1993;95:249–252. doi: 10.1016/0303-8467(93)90132-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. WHO 2009 www.who.int/topics/epidemiology/en/
  131. Yadav D., Aneja S., Dutta R., Maheshwari A., Seth A. Youngest survivor of Naegleria meningitis. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80:253–254. doi: 10.1007/s12098-012-0756-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Yoder J. S., Eddy B. A., Visvesvara G. S., Capewell L., Beach M. J. The epidemiology of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis in the USA, 1962–2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138:968–975. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809991014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Yoder J. S., Straif-Bourgeois S., Roy S. L., Moore T. A., Visvesvara G. S., Ratard R. C., Hill V. R., Wilson J. D., Linscott A. J., et al. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis deaths associated with sinus irrigation using contaminated tap water. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:e79. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Yousuf F. A., Siddiqui R., Subhani F., Khan N. A. Status of free-living amoebae (Acanthamoeba spp., Naegleria fowleri, Balamuthia mandrillaris) in drinking water supplies in Karachi, Pakistan. J Water Health. 2013;11:371–375. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Zhang L., Marciano-Cabral F., Bradley S. G. Effects of cyclophosphamide and a metabolite, acrolein, on Naegleria fowleri in vitro and in vivo . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32:962–965. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.7.962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES