Bacteria often engage in interference competition to gain access to an ecological niche, such as a host. However, little is known about how the physical environment experienced by free-living or host-associated bacteria influences such competition. We used the bioluminescent squid symbiont Vibrio fischeri to study how environmental viscosity impacts bacterial competition. Our results suggest that upon transition from a planktonic environment to a host-like environment, V. fischeri cells activate their type VI secretion system, a contact-dependent interbacterial nanoweapon, to eliminate natural competitors. This work shows that competitor cells form aggregates under host-like conditions, thereby facilitating the contact required for killing, and reveals how V. fischeri regulates a key competitive mechanism in response to the physical environment.
KEYWORDS: Aliivibrio fischeri, aggregation, competition, proteomics, type VI secretion
ABSTRACT
Symbiotic bacteria use diverse strategies to compete for host colonization sites. However, little is known about the environmental cues that modulate interbacterial competition as they transition between free-living and host-associated lifestyles. We used the mutualistic relationship between Eupyrmna scolopes squid and Vibrio fischeri bacteria to investigate how intraspecific competition is regulated as symbionts move from the seawater to a host-like environment. We recently reported that V. fischeri uses a type VI secretion system (T6SS) for intraspecific competition during host colonization. Here, we investigated how environmental viscosity impacts T6SS-mediated competition by using a liquid hydrogel medium that mimics the viscous host environment. Our data demonstrate that although the T6SS is functionally inactive when cells are grown under low-viscosity liquid conditions similar to those found in seawater, exposure to a host-like high-viscosity hydrogel enhances T6SS expression and sheath formation, activates T6SS-mediated killing in as little as 30 min, and promotes the coaggregation of competing genotypes. Finally, the use of mass spectrometry-based proteomics revealed insights into how cells may prepare for T6SS competition during this habitat transition. These findings, which establish the use of a new hydrogel culture condition for studying T6SS interactions, indicate that V. fischeri rapidly responds to the physical environment to activate the competitive mechanisms used during host colonization.
INTRODUCTION
The genomes of many host-associated bacteria encode diverse strategies for interbacterial competition, including the type VI secretion system (T6SS) (1–6), which is a contact-dependent killing mechanism. This protein export machinery has been identified in commensals (2, 7–9), pathogens (1, 3–6, 10, 11), and beneficial symbionts (2, 7) and is predicted to critically impact bacterial fitness in the host (12–16). The T6SS employs a toxin/immunity system to kill or inhibit competitor cells: an inhibitor cell builds a proteinaceous tube that acts as a molecular syringe to deliver toxic effector proteins directly into target cells, resulting in growth inhibition or cell death if the target lacks the appropriate immunity proteins (16–18). The T6SS structure, T6SS assembly, and classes of T6SS effectors have been elucidated by using isogenic mutants of several model organisms, including Vibrio cholerae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1, 3, 16, 19). More recently, researchers have turned to coculture experiments with nonisogenic strains to investigate the potential for T6SS interactions to influence the composition of natural microbial communities (2, 19–22).
Recent evidence suggests that T6SSs are active in animal microbiomes (2–6, 12, 13, 20, 22–24) and may be modulated by host-specific biochemical cues (4, 25). For example, mucin proteins promote the T6SS function of pandemic V. cholerae strains (25), and both V. cholerae and Salmonella enterica enhance T6SS function in the presence of bile salts (4, 25). Moreover, the transcription of one T6SS in P. aeruginosa is induced under iron-limiting conditions (26), which are found within the host environment. Despite the prevalence of T6SSs in host-associated bacteria, few studies have investigated how the host’s physical environment impacts T6SS function (25).
Like many horizontally acquired bacteria, the beneficial squid symbiont Vibrio fischeri experiences dramatic changes in its environment as it transitions between a free-living lifestyle in an aquatic habitat to a host-associated lifestyle. Juvenile squid hatch without their bacterial symbiont, which they acquire from the surrounding seawater (27). We previously showed that the V. fischeri genome encodes a strain-specific T6SS on chromosome II (T6SS2) that is used for interstrain competition during the initial colonization of the squid host (2). T6SS2 is necessary for one strain type (inhibitor) to prevent another strain type (target) from occupying the same colonization site. Because this T6SS provides strains with an advantage by excluding other genotypes as they compete for a limited number of sites in the host, we became interested in determining how the T6SS2 function is modulated in response to changes in the physical environment upon the transition from seawater to the host.
Although there are many differences between the chemical and physical properties of seawater and those of the host, here we focused on one factor: viscosity. During colonization, free-living V. fischeri transitions from a lower-viscosity aquatic habitat in the water column to a higher-viscosity environment as it becomes entrained in the host-generated fluid flow that facilitates the transport of bacterial cells toward the light organ surface (28), which is covered in mucus (29, 30). Here, symbiotic cells form and remain in aggregates for ∼15 to 180 min, depending on the strain type (31), before transiting to crypt spaces within the light organ, which contain a highly viscous lumen (32, 33). Moreover, some cells interact directly with the surface of host epithelial cells lining the crypts (34). Therefore, we predicted that differences in environmental viscosity upon habitat transition may be perceived by potential colonizers to be a host-specific cue to modulate T6SS-mediated competition.
In this study, we leveraged the ability to examine interstrain competition in vitro using V. fischeri isolates that naturally compete for the same niche to determine how cells regulate T6SS2 in response to a change in viscosity and surface association. We examined T6SS2 modulation at three levels: transcription of essential T6SS genes, assembly of the molecular syringe, and contact with target cells. In addition, we explored the capacity of a short exposure time under high-viscosity (mucus-like) conditions to prime cells for T6SS2-mediated killing. Finally, we used proteomics to determine the global cellular response to transitioning from a low-viscosity environment to a high-viscosity environment. This study illustrates how symbionts can rapidly respond to their physical environment as they prepare to engage with competitors of a host niche.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
PVP can control environmental viscosity in culture.
Although the surface-based coincubation assays described previously were essential for identifying and characterizing T6SS2 function in V. fischeri (2), they are not suitable to replicate key changes in the physical environment that symbionts experience when moving from aquatic to host habitats. Therefore, we sought to manipulate the viscosity of the liquid medium for use in our in vitro competition assay to better reflect the physical environments encountered by V. fischeri during habitat transition.
Previous studies have successfully used the water-soluble polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to increase the viscosity of bacterial culture media. When PVP is added to the medium at 2.5% to 10% by weight per volume (wt/vol), a high-viscosity hydrogel results (35–37). We first determined how PVP-amended medium impacts the growth of our V. fischeri strains. We grew strain ES114 or ES401 alone in minimal medium (MM) either with no added carbon source or supplemented with 10 mM N-acetylglucosamine (NAG), 5% (wt/vol) PVP, or a combination of 10 mM NAG and 5% PVP. Medium supplemented with 5% PVP was visibly more viscous and resulted in a hydrogel with a viscosity of ∼152 centipoise (cP). For reference, the viscosity of water at room temperature is ∼1 cP (38). After 12 h, both strains reached similar cell densities when grown in MM supplemented with NAG alone or NAG and PVP but were unable to grow in MM with no carbon source or when PVP was the sole carbon source (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). These data demonstrate that (i) the V. fischeri strains tested here are unable to use PVP as a carbon source and (ii) PVP does not impact the growth yield, at least within the first 12 h. Therefore, we concluded that supplementation of the medium with PVP is a good approach for controlling viscosity in liquid coincubation assays.
High-viscosity liquid promotes T6SS2-dependent competition.
We next used coincubation assays to quantify T6SS2-dependent interactions between two differentially tagged V. fischeri light organ isolates. We chose ES114 as the target strain (39) because its genome does not encode the T6SS2 genomic island (2) and ES401 as the inhibitor strain (27) because its genome contains the T6SS2 genomic island (40) and kills ES114 in coculture experiments on agar surfaces (2). When ES114 was coincubated with wild-type ES401 on agar surfaces, the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) for ES114 decreased significantly from the starting number of CFUs and were significantly lower than the ES401 CFUs at 12 h (Fig. 1A). In contrast, when ES114 was coincubated with the ES401 vasA_2 (tssF) mutant strain, which lacks the baseplate component required for T6SS function (2), the CFUs for both strains increased after 12 h and were not significantly different from each other (Fig. 1A). These findings indicate that ES401 outcompetes ES114 on agar surfaces using T6SS2, which is consistent with previous findings using other T6SS2-positive (T6SS2+) strains (2). When coincubation assays were performed in low-viscosity liquid, CFUs for ES114 increased after 12 h in the presence of both the wild-type ES401 and vasA_2 mutant strains (Fig. 1A). In contrast, coincubation assays in high-viscosity liquid showed ES114 CFUs significantly decreased after 12 h and were significantly lower than the CFUs for wild-type ES401, while CFUs of both strains increased when ES114 was incubated with the vasA_2 mutant (Fig. 1A). These data indicate that ES401 can outcompete a target strain in a T6SS2-dependent manner when strains are coincubated in a hydrogel medium.
Given that the viscosities of the juvenile light organ mucus and crypt lumen have not yet been directly quantified, we wanted to determine whether ES401 outcompeted ES114 across a range of viscosities. We next performed coincubation assays in media with viscosities ranging from 1 cP to 239 cP (Fig. 1B). The CFUs for ES114 were significantly lower than the CFUs for ES401 in all PVP-amended treatments (Fig. 1B). Importantly, the largest competitive effect was observed at 152 cP (5% PVP), which is within the range of viscosities observed for mucus in other hosts where sufficient samples can be obtained for direct measurement (41). Taken together, these data suggest that T6SS2-dependent competition is modulated by the physical environment: ES401 kills a target strain on surfaces and in high-viscosity liquid but does not do so in low-viscosity liquid. We considered three hypotheses to explain how the T6SS2 function is modulated in response to viscosity/surfaces: (i) T6SS2 is transcriptionally regulated by viscosity, (ii) T6SS2 sheath assembly is regulated by viscosity, and/or (iii) high viscosity promotes cell-cell contact between strains.
Viscosity regulates T6SS2 promoter activity and sheath formation.
To test our first hypothesis, whether a high-viscosity/surface environment activates T6SS2 gene expression, we constructed a lacZ-based promoter reporter for hcp_2 (tssD), an essential T6SS structural gene (19, 42). The hcp_2 promoter is encoded by a sequence upstream of a possible multigene operon that includes several essential T6SS structural genes (Fig. 2A), and therefore, serves as a good indicator of T6SS2 transcription. Plasmids containing the hcp_2 reporter (Phcp_2), a promoterless lacZ (empty vector), or a constitutive promoter driving the expression of lacZ (PCon) (43) were moved into strain ES401. Promoter activity was determined for strains incubated in each medium type by performing β-galactosidase assays and calculating the number of Miller units as described previously (44). Promoter activity for Phcp_2 was significantly higher in high-viscosity liquid and on agar surfaces than in low-viscosity liquid, while Miller unit values were not significantly different between medium types for the empty vector or the vector containing the constitutively active promoter (Fig. 2B). These data suggest that the increase in Phcp_2 activity is not an artifact of cell growth in high-viscosity liquid or on surfaces but, rather, is due to the transcriptional regulation of T6SS2 gene expression in response to the physical environment. Consistent with our observation that T6SS2 is functionally active across a range of viscosities (Fig. 1B), hcp_2 promoter activity was significantly enhanced in all PVP-amended media compared to that in the low-viscosity liquid (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that the hcp_2 promoter is activated by surface and high-viscosity liquid conditions across a range of viscosities.
We next tested how the physical environment impacts T6SS2 sheath formation. Given that Phcp_2 is activated upon the transition from low- to high-viscosity liquid and surfaces and that VipA-VipB (TssB-TssC) sheath components are encoded downstream of this promoter (40), we hypothesized that the proportion of cells with T6SS2 sheaths would increase upon the transition from low- to high-viscosity liquid/surfaces. To test this hypothesis, we used single-cell fluorescence microscopy to image cultures of ES401 harboring an inducible VipA_2-green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression vector that was previously used to visualize T6SS2 sheaths in T6SS2+ V. fischeri isolates (2). When ES401 cells expressing VipA_2-GFP were incubated in high-viscosity liquid, diffuse GFP was observed in all cells, indicating that the entire population expressed VipA_2-GFP, and many of these cells had VipA_2-GFP sheaths assembled (Fig. 2D). Moreover, the proportion of cells with sheaths grown to mid-exponential phase in low-viscosity liquid was ∼10%; however, when these cells were transitioned to 5% PVP or surfaces and incubated for 2 h, the proportion of cells with sheaths significantly increased to ∼50% (Fig. 2E). Together, these data suggest that moving from a low-viscosity environment to a high-viscosity or surface environment modulates the proportion of cells in a population that assemble T6SS2 sheaths.
T6SS2 activation in high viscosity is independent of key quorum-sensing genes.
We considered the possibility that higher-viscosity medium may impact the quorum-sensing (QS) pathway, which regulates luminescence in V. fischeri and which has been shown to regulate T6SSs in other species (26, 45–47). To explore this possibility, we first determined the impact of cell density alone on T6SS2 activation by quantifying the proportion of cells with sheaths for wild-type cultures grown in low-viscosity medium. As the culture density increased, the proportion of cells with sheaths remained at ∼10% (Fig. S2A), suggesting that cell density alone does not impact T6SS2 sheath assembly. To directly test the possibility that QS pathways impact T6SS2 activity in high-viscosity medium, we generated luxR and luxU regulatory mutants of the inhibitor strain, strain ES401. LuxR regulates downstream genes in response to the QS molecules N-octanoyl-l-homoserine lactone C8-HSL and N-3-oxohexanoyl-homoserine lactone (3OC6-HSL) (48, 49), and LuxU responds to C8-HSL and autoinducer-2 (AI-2) (50, 51). We chose to disrupt key proteins that sense and respond to QS molecules, rather than the synthesis proteins themselves, because the target strain can still produce the QS molecules, which could complement such mutations in the ES401 inhibitor in coculture (52). To ensure that these regulatory proteins function in ES401 in high viscosity as expected, we grew wild-type and vasA_2, luxR, and luxU mutant strains in high-viscosity medium and monitored cell density and luminescence over time. Consistent with the known role for these genes (50, 53), luminescence values were lower for the luxR mutant and higher for the luxU mutant than for the wild type (Fig. S2B). To directly test a role for these QS proteins in T6SS2 function in hydrogel, we performed coincubation assays with each of these mutants in high-viscosity liquid. We found that the luxR and luxU mutants were able to kill target cells to the same extent as the wild type (Fig. S2C), indicating that activation of T6SS2 in high viscosity is independent of these QS genes.
Short exposure to high viscosity primes cells for T6SS2 killing.
Given that ES401 cells respond to environmental viscosity by increasing sheath formation within 2 h, we hypothesized that T6SS2 killing is also activated within 2 h of exposure to high viscosity and is detectable at the population level. To test this hypothesis, we grew the target and inhibitor strains alone in low-viscosity liquid to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of ∼1.0 and then transferred these cells to high-viscosity liquid, where they remained for 0 to 180 min. Primed strains were then mixed at a 1:1 ratio and spotted onto an agar surface to force cells into physical contact to permit detection of T6SS2-mediated killing. CFUs were collected immediately (0 h) and after 1 h on the agar surfaces (1 h) (Fig. 3A). For all treatments, the initial proportion of ES114 to ES401 was not significantly different, indicating that the strains started the incubation on the agar surfaces at a 1:1 ratio (Fig. 3B). When strains were exposed to high-viscosity liquid for 0 or 15 min prior to mixing, ES114 and ES401 still maintained a 1:1 ratio after 1 h on the agar surfaces (Fig. 3B). However, when the strains were exposed to high-viscosity liquid for 30 to 180 min prior to mixing, ES114 comprised a significantly smaller proportion of the population after 1 h on the agar surfaces (Fig. 3B). This smaller proportion of ES114 in the coincubations after 1 h did not change with increasing exposure time to high-viscosity liquid medium, suggesting that more time in the hydrogel did not further enhance T6SS2 activation in ES401. When the same experiment was performed with ES114 and the ES401 vasA_2 mutant, both strains maintained a 1:1 ratio throughout the experiment across all treatments (Fig. 3C). These data suggest that a 30-min exposure to a high-viscosity environment prior to physical contact with target cells is sufficient for ES401 to activate T6SS2 and outcompete ES114 in a T6SS2-dependent manner. These findings are consistent with those of past studies that found evidence for host-specific chemical signals priming V. fischeri for important cellular processes in the host (54–58). Thus, V. fischeri likely encounters both physical and biochemical cues to prime cells for its host-associated lifestyle.
V. fischeri forms aggregates in high-viscosity liquid.
To test whether a high-viscosity environment promotes cell-cell contact, which is required for T6SS-mediated interactions, we first visualized a monoculture of fluorescently tagged ES401 grown in low- or high-viscosity liquid using single-cell microscopy. In low-viscosity liquid, cells were dispersed and very few neighboring cells were touching (Fig. 4A). In contrast, when ES401 was grown in high-viscosity liquid, the majority of cells formed multicellular aggregates (Fig. 4A). These aggregates could be easily disrupted by pipetting up and down (Fig. 4B), suggesting that the cells were loosely associated and that the act of pipetting and mixing these cultures during the dilution series was sufficient to disperse the cells to permit the accurate determination of CFU counts, which were comparable to those obtained for low-viscosity liquid, in which no aggregation was apparent. To determine whether aggregate formation is dependent on a functional T6SS2 or the presence of the T6SS2 genomic island, we imaged cultures of the ES401 vasA_2 mutant or ES114, which lacks the T6SS2 genomic island, when grown in low- or high-viscosity liquid. For both strain types, aggregates were observed only in high-viscosity liquid cultures (Fig. 4C), indicating that neither a functional T6SS2 nor the T6SS2 genomic island is required for aggregate formation in high-viscosity liquid.
Aggregates form within 6 h of the transition to high-viscosity conditions.
To determine how quickly the cells formed aggregates, we grew ES401 in low-viscosity liquid to an OD600 of ∼0.5, transferred the cells to high-viscosity liquid, and monitored the cell density over 22 h (Fig. 5A). The culture was subsampled at the time points indicated in Fig. 5A and imaged to quantify the size and the proportion of cells within the aggregates, which we defined as clusters of three or more cells. At the beginning of the experiment and after 3 h, less than 5% of the cells were associated with small aggregates of less than 10 cells (Fig. 5B and C). By 6 h, ∼74% of the cells in the culture were in moderately sized aggregates of ∼650 cells (Fig. 5B). By 9 h, the proportion of cells associated with aggregates further increased to ∼90%, and >98% of cells were in aggregates by 12 h, with the maximum aggregate size reaching >24,000 cells per aggregate (Fig. 5B). These data indicate that, under the conditions used here, cells begin to aggregate at ∼3 to 6 h after the transition from low- to high-viscosity liquid. Given that inhibitor cells are primed for T6SS2-dependent killing after only 30 min in hydrogel (Fig. 3), these findings suggest that inhibitor cells activate T6SS2 prior to making contact with other cells in aggregates and, therefore, that T6SS2 activation is a direct result of a change in the physical environment, rather than a response to being in an aggregate.
Competing genotypes coaggregate in hydrogel.
To determine whether multistrain aggregates form in hydrogel, mixed cultures of differentially tagged ES114 and ES401 vasA_2 mutant strains were incubated in low- or high-viscosity liquid for 12 h. We chose to use the vasA_2 mutant to observe cell-cell contact between inhibitor and target cells without the complication of ES114 being killed during the assay. In low-viscosity liquid, no aggregates were observed (Fig. 6A). In high-viscosity liquid, we observed coaggregates containing an equal percentage of each strain type: 50.6% ES114 and 49.4% ES401 vasA_2 mutant (±7.4%, standard deviation) (Fig. 6B). Given that the target and T6SS2 mutant inhibitor cells were in contact with one another, we predicted that the target cells would be eliminated within aggregates when the inhibitor had a functional T6SS2. To test this prediction, we incubated ES114 and wild-type ES401 in high-viscosity liquid for 12 h and observed aggregates composed nearly exclusively of inhibitor cells, with only a few, rounded target cells being present (<0.28% of the population) (Fig. 6B). Taken together, these observations indicate that high-viscosity medium promotes mixed-strain aggregates where an inhibitor strain can eliminate target cells and further demonstrate the utility of hydrogel as a controlled, host-like liquid environment for studying bacterial aggregation and T6SS interactions.
V. fischeri enhances T6SS and ribosomal protein expression in high viscosity.
Given that V. fischeri undergoes significant physiological changes when transitioning between low- and high-viscosity conditions, we wanted to gain insight into how V. fischeri modulates protein expression in response to environmental viscosity. We quantified the proteome of ES401 grown in low-viscosity liquid, as well as that of ES401 after being transitioned to high viscosity for 1, 12, or 24 h (Fig. S3). Samples were collected in the same growth phase for each comparison to ensure that the differences in expression were due to the conditions tested (59). We detected 1,463 proteins (Table S1), or ∼38% of the proteins encoded by the ES401 genome (40), which is the portion of the proteome that we would expect to detect based on previous comprehensive proteomics studies (60). We first compared the proteomes of cultures in low- or high-viscosity liquid for 1 h (Fig. S3, black triangles) and found that only 14 proteins were significantly differentially expressed between treatments (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P < 0.02) (Table S2), suggesting that 1 h in high viscosity is not sufficient to detect substantial changes in the proteome. We next compared the proteomes of cultures grown in low viscosity (0 h of exposure to high viscosity) to those of cultures exposed to hydrogel for 12 or 24 h (Fig. S3, gray triangles). We performed a principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of these proteomes, which revealed that the samples clustered by the duration of exposure to hydrogel (Fig. 7A). The 0- and 24-h treatments clustered the farthest from one another (Fig. 7A and B) (ANOVA, P < 0.03), and the number of differentially abundant proteins (638 proteins) was significantly larger than that seen in the 0-h versus 12-h treatment comparison (53 proteins) (Tables S3 and S4).
To further analyze the 0-h versus 24-h exposure treatments, a volcano plot was generated to visualize the significantly differentially expressed proteins (Fig. 7C). Next, we identified all proteins encoded in the T6SS2 genomic island: both T6SS2 structural proteins (light blue) and other genomic island proteins (dark blue) were significantly more abundant under the high-viscosity condition than under the low-viscosity condition. Consistent with the increased hcp_2 promoter reporter activity and the sheath assembly data, both Hcp and the VipA/VipB sheath proteins were more abundant in the high-viscosity liquid than in the low-viscosity liquid, as was one of the predicted T6SS effectors encoded in auxiliary cluster II. When we examined the other differentially expressed proteins, we noticed that 44 of the 60 predicted ribosomal proteins were significantly more abundant in high viscosity than in low viscosity (Fig. 7C; Table S4). It is therefore tempting to speculate that the corresponding increase of T6SS expression, which is a large nanostructure composed of many protein subunits and protein synthesis machinery, could be a mechanism for cells to support the building of T6SS sheaths, which is predicted to be energetically costly (61). Although this initial analysis revealed novel insights into how cells modulate T6SS and ribosomal protein expression, further analysis of the remaining differentially abundant proteins could reveal other physiological responses to changes in environmental viscosity. It is also notable that proteins encoded by genes belonging to the cellulose (62) and symbiosis polysaccharide (syp) biofilm gene clusters (63–65) were largely undetected, suggesting that aggregate formation in hydrogel likely occurs through an alternative mechanism.
Conclusion.
Taken together, the findings of this work demonstrate that V. fischeri modulates the T6SS2-dependent killing of target cells in response to a transition from a lower-viscosity (i.e., planktonic) environment to the higher-viscosity and surface environments experienced in the host. Based on what is currently known about host colonization kinetics, the role of T6SS2 in preventing cocolonized crypts, and T6SS2 modulation described above, we propose a model for how T6SS2 may be activated by host-like viscosity to prime cells for interstrain competition for the host niche (Fig. 8). Juvenile Eupyrmna scolopes squid hatch without their light organ symbionts, which they acquire from the water column. Our data suggest V. fischeri cells in this planktonic state are physically dispersed, the levels of T6SS2 transcription and protein expression are low, and T6SS2 is functionally inactive. Planktonic V. fischeri cells aggregate in a mucus matrix on the light organ surface, where they experience a dramatic increase in viscosity (29, 65), which may act to prime cells for T6SS2-mediated competition. Founder cells then disperse from aggregates to enter the pores and travel through the ducts into the crypts, where populations proliferate. If a crypt is initially cocolonized by two competing strain types, direct contact between cells facilitates T6SS2-mediated interactions, resulting in crypts that are colonized exclusively by one strain type (2).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Media and growth conditions, strain and plasmid construction, coincubation assays, and single-cell fluorescence microscopy were performed as previously described (2, 66). β-Galactosidase assays were performed as previously described (44). See Text S1 in the supplemental material for additional experimental details.
Quantifying the viscosity of the media.
Medium viscosity was determined by quantifying the velocity of a small glass sphere as it traveled through a graduated cylinder containing PVP-amended liquid medium. The viscosity of the medium (in grams centimeter−1 second−1) was calculated using the following equation: viscosity = {2[(sphere density) − (medium density)] × gravity × (sphere radius)2}/[9 × sphere velocity], where the sphere and medium densities are in grams centimeter−3, the gravity is in centimeters second−2, the sphere velocities are in centimeters per second, and the sphere radius is in centimeters (67). This experiment was performed twice with 10 replicates per experiment.
Quantification of aggregate size and proportion of strain types.
Aggregates were visualized using cultures of V. fischeri strains harboring either pVSV102 (GFP) or pVSV208 (dsRed red fluorescent protein [RFP]) and an Olympus BX51 microscope outfitted with an Hamamatsu C8484-03G01 camera. Cultures were initially grown in low-viscosity liquid, normalized to an OD600 of 1.0, and then 10 μl was transferred into high-viscosity liquid. The cultures were then incubated for up to 12 h, after which 5 μl of each culture was spotted onto a glass slide and imaged within 30 min using a 60× (numerical aperture, 1.30) oil Ph3 objective lens. Images were captured using MetaMorph software. The proportion of aggregated cells was determined by using the image/adjust/threshold command to segment the image into particle and background components using ImageJ software. The number of particles and the area of each particle were calculated, and then the number of cells per particle was determined by dividing the particle size by the average size of a V. fischeri cell (1.5 μm2). Particles containing three or more cells were defined as aggregates. For experiments with mixed-strain aggregates, the proportion of strain types within each aggregate was determined by first calculating the total area of an aggregate in the composite image of both strains. Next, the proportion of the aggregate area that was either GFP or dsRed was determined and divided by the total area of the aggregate. These values were compared to ensure that they added up to 1.0 (the entire area of the aggregate) and to get the final ratio.
Sample preparation for proteomics.
Cultures of strain ES401 were grown in standing cultures at 24°C in either low- or high-viscosity liquid and subcultured every 12 h into fresh medium (Fig. S3). Samples were incubated in high-viscosity liquid for either 0, 1, 12, or 24 h and collected by centrifugation at the time points indicated above, and cell pellets were frozen at −80°C. Thirty microliters of SDT-lysis buffer (4% [wt/vol] SDS, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 M dithiothreitol) was added to each cell pellet, and then the samples were incubated at 95°C for 10 min for cell lysis. Tryptic digests of protein extracts were prepared following the filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) protocol (68). In addition to the minor modifications described by Kleiner et al. (69), lysate was not cleared by centrifugation after boiling the sample in lysis buffer. We loaded the whole lysate onto the filter units used for the FASP procedure. Centrifugation times were reduced to 20 min, which is different from the centrifugation time used by Kleiner et al. (69). Peptide concentrations were determined with a Pierce micro-bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using an Epoch2 microplate reader (BioTek), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
LC-MS/MS.
All samples were analyzed by one-dimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described previously (70), with the modification that a 75-cm analytical column and a 140-min-long gradient were used. For each sample run, 400 ng peptide was loaded with an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano liquid chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in loading solvent A (2% acetonitrile, 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid) onto a 5-mm, 300-μm (inside diameter) C18 Acclaim PepMap100 precolumn (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Separation of the peptides on the analytical column (75-cm by 75-μm analytical Easy-Spray column packed with PepMap RSLC C18 [particle size, 2 μm] material; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was achieved at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1 using a 140-min gradient going from 95% buffer A (0.1% formic acid) to 31% buffer B (0.1% formic acid, 80% acetonitrile) in 102 min and then to 50% buffer B in 18 min to 99% buffer B in 1 min and ending with 99% buffer B. The analytical column was heated to 60°C and was connected to a Q Exactive HF hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) via an Easy-Spray source. Eluting peptides were ionized via electrospray ionization (ESI). Carryover was reduced by one wash run (injection of 20 μl acetonitrile, 99% buffer B) between samples. Full scans were acquired in the Orbitrap mass spectrometer at a resolution of 60,000. The 15 most abundant precursor ions were selected for fragmentation, and MS/MS scans were acquired at a resolution of 15,000. A mass (m/z) of 445.12003 was used as the lock mass. Ions with a charge state of +1 were excluded from the MS/MS analysis. Dynamic exclusion was set to 18 s. Roughly 135,000 MS/MS spectra were acquired per sample.
Protein identification and statistical analysis.
A database containing protein sequences from V. fischeri ES401 (GenBank accession number SRJG00000000.1) downloaded from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/wgs/SRJG01) was used. Sequences of common laboratory contaminants were included by appending the cRAP protein sequence database (http://www.thegpm.org/crap/). The final database contained 3,925 protein sequences. Searches of the MS/MS spectra against this database were performed with the Sequest HT node in Proteome Discoverer software (version 2.2.0.388; Thermo Fisher Scientific), as described by Petersen et al. (71). Only proteins identified with medium or high confidence were retained, resulting in an overall false discovery rate of <5%. For protein quantification, normalized spectral abundance factors (NSAFs) (72) were calculated and multiplied by 100 to obtain relative protein abundance (in percent).
Principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed using a Bray-Curtis-based dissimilarity matrix from the vegan package in R (73). A contingency table was generated by comparing average protein abundance between treatments using a Student's t test, corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (74). A volcano plot was generated by graphing the negative log10 P value and log2 fold change between treatments. NSAFs of 0 were replaced by the limit-of-detection value of 0.000189 to allow for comparisons of the log2 fold change between treatments.
Data availability.
The mass spectrometry metaproteomics data and protein sequence database have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (75) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD015403.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Barbara MacGregor and Scott Gifford for helpful discussions; Aditi Garikipati, Audrey Dinyari, and Madison Woo for laboratory assistance; and Andreas Teske for technical assistance.
All LC-MS/MS measurements were made in the Molecular Education, Technology, and Research Innovation Center (METRIC) at North Carolina State University.
The proteomics work was supported by the North Carolina State University Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program Cluster on Microbiomes and Complex Microbial Communities (to M.K.).
Footnotes
Citation Speare L, Smith S, Salvato F, Kleiner M, Septer AN. 2020. Environmental viscosity modulates interbacterial killing during habitat transition. mBio 11:e03060-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03060-19.
Contributor Information
Alain Filloux, Imperial College London.
E. Peter Greenberg, University of Washington.
REFERENCES
- 1.MacIntyre DL, Miyata ST, Kitaoka M, Pukatzki S. 2010. The Vibrio cholerae type VI secretion system displays antimicrobial properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19520–19524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012931107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Speare L, Cecere AG, Guckes KR, Smith S, Wollenberg MS, Mandel MJ, Miyashiro T, Septer AN. 2018. Bacterial symbionts use a type VI secretion system to eliminate competitors in their natural host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E8528–E8537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808302115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salomon D, Gonzalez H, Updegraff BL, Orth K. 2013. Vibrio parahaemolyticus type VI secretion system 1 is activated in marine conditions to target bacteria, and is differentially regulated from system 2. PLoS One 8:e61086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sana TG, Flaugnatti N, Lugo KA, Lam LH, Jacobson A, Baylot V, Durand E, Journet L, Cascales E, Monack DM. 2016. Salmonella typhimurium utilizes a T6SS-mediated antibacterial weapon to establish in the host gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E5044–E5051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608858113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schwarz S, West TE, Boyer F, Chiang W-C, Carl MA, Hood RD, Rohmer L, Tolker-Nielsen T, Skerrett SJ, Mougous JD. 2010. Burkholderia type VI secretion systems have distinct roles in eukaryotic and bacterial cell interactions. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001068. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wenren LM, Sullivan NL, Cardarelli L, Septer AN, Gibbs KA, Wenren LM, Sullivan NL, Cardarelli L, Septer AN, Gibbs KA. 2013. Two independent pathways for self-recognition in Proteus mirabilis are linked by type VI-dependent export. mBio 4:e00374-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Russell AB, Wexler AG, Harding BN, Whitney JC, Bohn AJ, Goo YA, Tran BQ, Barry NA, Zheng H, Peterson SB, Chou S, Gonen T, Goodlett DR, Goodman AL, Mougous JD. 2014. A type VI secretion-related pathway in Bacteroidetes mediates interbacterial antagonism. Cell Host Microbe 16:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chatzidaki-Livanis M, Geva-Zatorsky N, Comstock LE. 2016. Bacteroides fragilis type VI secretion systems use novel effector and immunity proteins to antagonize human gut Bacteroidales species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:3627–3632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522510113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Coyne MJ, Roelofs KG, Comstock LE. 2016. Type VI secretion systems of human gut Bacteroidales segregate into three genetic architectures, two of which are contained on mobile genetic elements. BMC Genomics 17:58. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2377-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sana TG, Baumann C, Merdes A, Soscia C, Rattei T, Hachani A, Jones C, Bennett KL, Filloux A, Superti-Furga G, Voulhoux R, Bleves S. 2015. Internalization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 into epithelial cells is promoted by interaction of a T6SS effector with the microtubule network. mBio 6:e00712-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00712-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang Y, Du P, Zhao M, Liu W, Du Y, Diao B, Li J, Kan B, Liang W. 2017. Functional characterization and conditional regulation of the type VI secretion system in Vibrio fluvialis. Front Microbiol 8:528. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mougous JD, Cuff ME, Raunser S, Shen A, Zhou M, Gifford CA, Goodman AL, Joachimiak G, Ordoñez CL, Lory S, Walz T, Joachimiak A, Mekalanos JJ. 2006. A virulence locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science 312:1526–1530. doi: 10.1126/science.1128393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Sturtevant D, Krastins B, Sarracino D, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Mekalanos JJ. 2006. Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:1528–1533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510322103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schwarz S, Singh P, Robertson JD, LeRoux M, Skerrett SJ, Goodlett DR, West TE, Mougous JD. 2014. VgrG-5 is a Burkholderia type VI secretion exported protein required for multinucleated giant cell formation and virulence. Infect Immun 82:e01368-13. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01368-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Coulthurst SJ. 2013. The type VI secretion system—a widespread and versatile cell targeting system. Res Microbiol 164:640–654. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cianfanelli FR, Monlezun L, Coulthurst SJ. 2016. Aim, load, fire: the type VI secretion system, a bacterial nanoweapon. Trends Microbiol 24:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Joshi A, Kostiuk B, Rogers A, Teschler J, Pukatzki S, Yildiz FH. 2017. Rules of engagement: the type VI secretion system in Vibrio cholerae. Trends Microbiol 25:267–279. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ho BT, Dong TG, Mekalanos JJ. 2014. A view to a kill: the bacterial type VI secretion system. Cell Host Microbe 15:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coulthurst SJ. 2019. The type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon. Microbiology 165:503–515. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Anderson MC, Vonaesch P, Saffarian A, Marteyn BS, Sansonetti PJ. 2017. Shigella sonnei encodes a functional T6SS used for interbacterial competition and niche occupancy. Cell Host Microbe 21:769–776.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hecht AL, Casterline BW, Earley ZM, Goo YA, Goodlett DR, Wardenburg JB. 2016. Strain competition restricts colonization of an enteric pathogen and prevents colitis. EMBO Rep 17:1281–1291. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhao W, Caro F, Robins W, Mekalanos JJ. 2018. Antagonism toward the intestinal microbiota and its effect on Vibrio cholerae virulence. Science 359:210–213. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weber BS, Ly PM, Irwin JN, Pukatzki S, Feldman MF. 2015. A multidrug resistance plasmid contains the molecular switch for type VI secretion in Acinetobacter baumannii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:9442–9447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502966112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Church SR, Lux T, Baker-Austin C, Buddington SP, Michell SL. 2016. Vibrio vulnificus type 6 secretion system 1 contains anti-bacterial properties. PLoS One 11:e0165500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bachmann V, Kostiuk B, Unterweger D, Diaz-Satizabal L, Ogg S, Pukatzki S. 2015. Bile salts modulate the mucin-activated type VI secretion system of pandemic Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0004031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sana TG, Hachani A, Bucior I, Soscia C, Garvis S, Termine E, Engel J, Filloux A, Bleves S. 2012. The second type VI secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 is regulated by quorum sensing and Fur and modulates internalization in epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 287:27095–27105. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.376368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee K-H, Ruby EG. 1994. Effect of the squid host on the abundance and distribution of symbiotic Vibrio fischeri in nature. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1565–1571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nawroth JC, Guo H, Koch E, Heath-Heckman EA, Hermanson JC, Ruby EG, Dabiri JO, Kanso E, McFall-Ngai M. 2017. Motile cilia create fluid-mechanical microhabitats for the active recruitment of the host microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:9510–9516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706926114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nyholm SV, Stabb EV, Ruby EG, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2000. Establishment of an animal-bacterial association: recruiting symbiotic vibrios from the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:10231–10235. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.18.10231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nyholm SV, Deplancke B, Gaskins HR, Apicella MA, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2002. Roles of Vibrio fischeri and nonsymbiotic bacteria in the dynamics of mucus secretion during symbiont colonization of the Euprymna scolopes light organ. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5113–5122. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.10.5113-5122.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bongrand C, Ruby EG. 2018. Achieving a multi-strain symbiosis: strain behavior and infection dynamics. ISME J 13:698–706. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0305-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schleicher TR, Nyholm SV. 2011. Characterizing the host and symbiont proteomes in the association between the bobtail squid, Euprymna scolopes, and the bacterium, Vibrio fischeri. PLoS One 6:e25649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Graf J, Ruby EG. 1998. Host-derived amino acids support the proliferation of symbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:1818–1822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Altura MA, Heath‐Heckman EA, Gillette A, Kremer N, Krachler AM, Brennan C, Ruby EG, Orth K, McFall‐Ngai MJ. 2013. The first engagement of partners in the Euprymna scolopes-Vibrio fischeri symbiosis is a two‐step process initiated by a few environmental symbiont cells. Environ Microbiol 15:2937–2950. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Atsumi T, Maekawa Y, Yamada T, Kawagishi I, Imae Y, Homma M. 1996. Effect of viscosity on swimming by the lateral and polar flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus. J Bacteriol 178:5024–5026. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.16.5024-5026.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Eloe EA, Lauro FM, Vogel RF, Bartlett DH. 2008. The deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium profundum SS9 utilizes separate flagellar systems for swimming and swarming under high-pressure conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6298–6305. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01316-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ito M, Terahara N, Fujinami S, Krulwich TA. 2005. Properties of motility in Bacillus subtilis powered by the H+-coupled MotAB flagellar stator, Na+-coupled MotPS or hybrid stators MotAS or MotPB. J Mol Biol 352:396–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Korson L, Drost-Hansen W, Millero FJ. 1969. Viscosity of water at various temperatures. J Phys Chem 73:34–39. doi: 10.1021/j100721a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Boettcher KJ, Ruby EG. 1994. Occurrence of plasmid DNA in the sepiolid squid symbiont Vibrio fischeri. Curr Microbiol 29:279–286. doi: 10.1007/BF01577441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bultman KM, Cecere AG, Miyashiro T, Septer AN, Mandel MJ, Bultman KM, Cecere AG, Miyashiro T, Septer AN, Mandel MJ. 2019. Draft genome sequences of type VI secretion system-encoding Vibrio fischeri strains FQ-A001 and ES401. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e00385-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lai SK, Wang Y-Y, Wirtz D, Hanes J. 2009. Micro- and macrorheology of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:86–100. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Silverman JM, Brunet YR, Cascales E, Mougous JD. 2012. Structure and regulation of the type VI secretion system. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:453–472. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-121809-151619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bose JL, Wollenberg MS, Colton DM, Mandel MJ, Septer AN, Dunn AK, Stabb EV. 2011. Contribution of rapid evolution of the luxR-luxI intergenic region has contributed to the diverse bioluminescence output of Vibrio fischeri strains isolated from different environments. Applied Environ Microbiol 77:2445–2457. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02643-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bose JL, Rosenberg CS, Stabb EV. 2008. Effects of luxCDABEG induction in Vibrio fischeri: enhancement of symbiotic colonization and conditional attenuation of growth in culture. Arch Microbiol 190:169–183. doi: 10.1007/s00203-008-0387-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lesic B, Starkey M, He J, Hazan R, Rahme LG. 2009. Quorum sensing differentially regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa type VI secretion locus I and homologous loci II and III, which are required for pathogenesis. Microbiology 155:2845–2855. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.029082-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ishikawa T, Rompikuntal PK, Lindmark B, Milton DL, Wai SN. 2009. Quorum sensing regulation of the two hcp alleles in Vibrio cholerae O1 strains. PLoS One 4:e6734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zheng J, Shin OS, Cameron DE, Mekalanos JJ. 2010. Quorum sensing and a global regulator TsrA control expression of type VI secretion and virulence in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:21128–21133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014998107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Engebrecht J, Silverman M. 1984. Identification of genes and gene products necessary for bacterial bioluminescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81:4154–4158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.4154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Meighen EA. 1991. Molecular biology of bacterial bioluminescence. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 55:123–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kimbrough JH, Stabb EV. 2015. Antisocial luxO mutants provide a stationary-phase survival advantage in Vibrio fischeri ES114. J Bacteriol 198:673–687. doi: 10.1128/JB.00807-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lupp C, Urbanowski M, Greenberg EP, Ruby EG. 2003. The Vibrio fischeri quorum‐sensing systems ain and lux sequentially induce luminescence gene expression and are important for persistence in the squid host. Mol Microbiol 50:319–331. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.t01-1-03585.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Septer AN, Stabb EV. 2012. Coordination of the arc regulatory system and pheromone-mediated positive feedback in controlling the Vibrio fischeri lux operon. PLoS One 7:e49590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Visick KL, Foster J, Doino J, McFall-Ngai M, Ruby EG. 2000. Vibrio fischeri lux genes play an important role in colonization and development of the host light organ. J Bacteriol 182:4578–4586. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.16.4578-4586.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Davidson SK, Koropatnick TA, Kossmehl R, Sycuro L, McFall‐Ngai MJ. 2004. NO means ‘yes’ in the squid‐vibrio symbiosis: nitric oxide (NO) during the initial stages of a beneficial association. Cell Microbiol 6:1139–1151. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang Y, Dunn AK, Wilneff J, McFall‐Ngai MJ, Spiro S, Ruby EG. 2010. Vibrio fischeri flavohaemoglobin protects against nitric oxide during initiation of the squid-Vibrio symbiosis. Mol Microbiol 78:903–915. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07376.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang Y, Dufour YS, Carlson HK, Donohue TJ, Marletta MA, Ruby EG. 2010. H-NOX–mediated nitric oxide sensing modulates symbiotic colonization by Vibrio fischeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:8375–8380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003571107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kremer N, Philipp EER, Carpentier M-C, Brennan CA, Kraemer L, Altura MA, Augustin R, Häsler R, Heath-Heckman EAC, Peyer SM, Schwartzman J, Rader BA, Ruby EG, Rosenstiel P, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2013. Initial symbiont contact orchestrates host-organ-wide transcriptional changes that prime tissue colonization. Cell Host Microbe 14:183–194. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mandel MJ, Schaefer AL, Brennan CA, Heath-Heckman EA, DeLoney-Marino CR, McFall-Ngai MJ, Ruby EG. 2012. Squid-derived chitin oligosaccharides are a chemotactic signal during colonization by Vibrio fischeri. Applied Environ Microbiol 78:e00377-12. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00377-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gifford SM, Becker JW, Sosa OA, Repeta DJ, DeLong EF, Gifford SM, Becker JW, Sosa OA, Repeta DJ, DeLong EF. 2016. Quantitative transcriptomics reveals the growth- and nutrient-dependent response of a streamlined marine methylotroph to methanol and naturally occurring dissolved organic matter. mBio 7:e01279-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01279-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zorz JK, Kozlowski JA, Stein LY, Strous M, Kleiner M. 2018. Comparative proteomics of three species of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Front Microbiol 9:938. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Basler M. 2015. Type VI secretion system: secretion by a contractile nanomachine. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370:20150021. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Darnell CL, Hussa EA, Visick KL. 2008. The putative hybrid sensor kinase SypF coordinates biofilm formation in Vibrio fischeri by acting upstream of two response regulators, SypG and VpsR. J Bacteriol 190:4941–4950. doi: 10.1128/JB.00197-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Koehler S, Gaedeke R, Thompson C, Bongrand C, Visick KL, Ruby E, McFall‐Ngai M. 22 August 2018. The model squid–vibrio symbiosis provides a window into the impact of strain‐and species‐level differences during the initial stages of symbiont engagement. Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Shibata S, Yip ES, Quirke KP, Ondrey JM, Visick KL. 2012. Roles of the structural symbiosis polysaccharide (syp) genes in host colonization, biofilm formation and polysaccharide biosynthesis in Vibrio fischeri. J Bacteriol 194:6736–6747. doi: 10.1128/JB.00707-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yip ES, Geszvain K, DeLoney‐Marino CR, Visick KL. 2006. The symbiosis regulator RscS controls the syp gene locus, biofilm formation and symbiotic aggregation by Vibrio fischeri. Mol Microbiol 62:1586–1600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05475.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Speare L, Septer AN, Speare L, Septer AN. 22 July 2019. Coincubation assay for quantifying competitive interactions between Vibrio fischeri isolates. J Vis Exp doi: 10.3791/59759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology. 1996. Exploring planets in the classroom. Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Manoa, Hawai'i: http://www.spacegrant.hawaii.edu/class_acts/Viscosity.html. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. 2009. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 6:359–362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kleiner M, Thorson E, Sharp CE, Dong X, Liu D, Li C, Strous M. 2017. Assessing species biomass contributions in microbial communities via metaproteomics. Nat Commun 8:1558. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01544-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hinzke T, Kouris A, Hughes R-A, Strous M, Kleiner M. 2019. More is not always better: evaluation of 1D and 2D-LC-MS/MS methods for metaproteomics. Front Microbiol 10:238. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Petersen JM, Kemper A, Gruber-Vodicka H, Cardini U, van der Geest M, Kleiner M, Bulgheresi S, Mußmann M, Herbold C, Seah BKB, Antony CP, Liu D, Belitz A, Weber M. 2016. Chemosynthetic symbionts of marine invertebrate animals are capable of nitrogen fixation. Nat Microbiol 2:16195. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. 2006. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 5:2339–2347. doi: 10.1021/pr060161n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara R, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. 2015. Vegan: community ecology package, version 2. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/publication/vegan-community-ecology-package-r-package-vegan-vers-22-1.
- 74.Benjamini Y, Hochberg YJ. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Vizcaíno JA, Csordas A, del-Toro N, Dianes JA, Griss J, Lavidas I, Mayer G, Perez-Riverol Y, Reisinger F, Ternent T, Xu Q-W, Wang R, Hermjakob H. 2016. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D447–D456. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The mass spectrometry metaproteomics data and protein sequence database have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (75) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD015403.