Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Eye logoLink to Eye
. 2019 Apr 8;33(9):1443–1451. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0404-4

Foveal and parafoveal choroidal thickness pattern measuring by swept source optical coherence tomography

Pear Pongsachareonnont 1,2,✉, Thanapong Somkijrungroj 1,2, Buravej Assavapongpaiboon 1,2, Theerada Chitamara 1,2, Maytavee Chuntarapas 1,2, Disorn Suwajanakorn 1,2
PMCID: PMC7002508  PMID: 30962543

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the choroidal thickness (CT) in foveal and parafoveal regions in Thai adults using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).

Methods

We enrolled healthy volunteers ≥18 years of age from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand, during September 2015 to March 2016. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula was performed, and subfoveal CT was measured manually using a line scan. Average thicknesses of retinal and choroidal layers in regions of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid were measured automatically. A multivariate analysis was conducted to determine correlations between CTs in the foveal and parafoveal regions and retinal layers.

Results

Altogether, 144 eyes from 144 subjects (29 men, 115 women; mean age 41 years) were studied. The mean foveal CT was 282.4 ± 13.8 µm. It was thicker in the temporal fovea than in the nasal fovea (p < 0.001) and thicker in men than in women. Multivariate analysis showed that age and sex were significantly negatively correlated with the thickness of the retina, ganglion cell layer, outer retinal layer, and choroid but not of the nerve fiber layer. Regression analysis revealed that the CT decreased approximately 1.5 μm per year.

Conclusions

Age and sex significantly influence choroidal thickness. Macular CT in a healthy eye thins with age. CT decreases with age faster at distances away from the foveal center than at the center. Subfoveal CT was greater than the mean CT. Parafoveal CT should be evaluated to identify specific retinal–choroidal disease.

Subject terms: Retinal diseases, Anatomy

Introduction

Choroidal thickness (CT) plays an important role in the pathogeneses and predictions of pachychoroid entities, central serous chorioretinopathy [1, 2], polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy [3], age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [4, 5], posterior uveitis [6], Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease, multiple evanescent white dot syndrome, and multifocal choroiditis. CT is also associated with other pathological eye conditions, such as high myopia [7, 8] and glaucoma [9, 10]. In addition, physiological conditions—age [11, 12], sex [12], diurnal variation [13], choroidal blood flow [14], axial length [15], and myopia [16]—affect CT in normal populations. Assessment of CT provides diagnostic power for differentiating between healthy and pathological eyes, including neovascularized AMD, central serous chorioretinopathy, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy [3], posterior uveitis [6], and high myopia. Some systemic disorders have also been shown to be related to choroidal changes, including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ankylosing spondylitis, Behçet’s disease, sarcoidosis, Sturge–Weber syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease [17]. Many physiological conditions, including diurnal variation [13], age, and sex, also affect CT [18].

The development of indocyanine green angiography and ultrasonography allowed the first visualization of choroidal structures. This traditional imaging of the choroid, however, was insufficient for quantitative assessments because of its limited resolution. With the development of optical coherence tomography (OCT), the retinal layers were more clearly demonstrated with nearly histology-level details. Currently, spectral domain (SD) imaging is widely used and offers significant advantages over the earlier time-domain imaging [19]. Imaging of the deeper layer (i.e., choroid), however, was still poorly detailed by SD-OCT. Enhanced depth imaging (EDI) was developed to focus more on the choroidal layer by reducing scattering effects and depth-dependent reduction in sensitivity [20]. With EDI OCT, however, the image quality of the retinal layers was traded off to obtain details of the choroid.

Swept-source (SS) OCT has now been developed, with a tunable laser operating using a longer-wavelength light source (~1050 nm) and a high-speed photodetector instead of a spectrometer. SS-OCT provides better scan speed and deeper images than SD-OCT [21]. With an operating wavelength of 1 µm and less variable sensitivity with increasing depth (sensitivity roll-off), SS-OCT provides less susceptibility to scattering in cataract cases and better penetration through retinal pigmented epithelium to visualize deeper layers, such as those of the choroid [22]. This ability enables SS-OCT to penetrate deep tissues and provide a picture of both the retina and choroid simultaneously. Hence, SS-OCT is considered the instrument of choice for studying the choroidal layer.

CT varies among ethnic groups [11, 12, 23–25] which results in different reference values for normal eyes among populations. Moreover, a previous study showed poor agreement about retinal thickness (RT) measurements by different OCT machines in healthy eyes [26]. Despite the good correlation, RTs measured by various devices showed significant differences [27]. The aims of the current study were to measure the CT of normal eyes as a reference for an adult Thai population using SS-OCT and to evaluate the association of foveal and parafoveal anatomy and that of the choroid.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University institutional review board approved the study (IRB No. 260/58). Healthy volunteers were prospectively recruited in the hospital from September 2015 to March 2016. The inclusion criteria were: (1) healthy subjects aged ≥18 years; (2) best corrected visual acuity in the study eye >20/30 Snellen; and (3) spherical equivalent measured by autorefraction less than ±3 diopters. The exclusion criteria were: (1) inability to undergo scanning by the instrument; (2) a past medical history of diabetes, hypertension, cancer, and/or endocrine disease by chart record and patient history; (3) myopia or hyperopia with a spherical equivalent of >3 diopters; (4) intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg; (5) presence of ocular disease including retinal disease, choroidal disease, glaucoma, and uveitis; and (6) previous ocular surgery of the eye. We considered an eye as a single study unit and only the left eyes were included in the analysis.

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to enrollment in the study. The study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trial Registration before the study [TCTR20150526001].

We recorded the patients’ demographic data including age and sex, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the results of autorefraction measurements and air-puff tonometry. As is known from previous publications, age influences CT. Hence, the study group was divided into five subgroups according to their age: 18–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, and >61 years.

Visual acuity was measure using a modified numerical Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart 4 m distant from the patient. SS-OCT imaging was performed using the DRI OCT Triton™ apparatus (software version 1.21; Topcon Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). This instrument had a center wavelength of 1050 nm with a scanning rate of 100,000 A-scans/s, yielding resolutions of 8 μm (axial) and 20 μm (transverse) in tissue [28].

Imaging protocol

OCT images of two scan types, horizontal line and three-dimensional volumetric scans, were obtained by a trained single operator. One image from each scan type was taken from each patient. Any image with poor quality was rejected and another image was retaken until a good quality one is achieved. Only good-quality images were included for analysis.

  • A horizontal, high-definition, 12-mm line scan was obtained that included the fovea and optic nerve head area for visualizing the choroid–sclera interface and analyzing CT measurements.

  • A three-dimensional, wide, macular volumetric scan (9 × 12 mm) for the average CT of each segment according to the ETDRS grid and automatically calculated by the OCT software. The ETDRS grid was composed of three circles with diameters of 1, 3, and 6 mm, respectively, all with the same center, as shown in Fig. 1. The foveal area was taken to be that area surrounded by the innermost circle (0.79 mm2), and its average thickness was calculated. The two outer circles were divided into four quadrants—superior, temporal, inferior, nasal—which then were divided into an inner region (1.57 mm2) and outer region (5.30 mm2). The average full RTs and the CTs for each region were automatically measured: nerve fiber layer (NFL), ganglion cell complex (GCC) (which included the NFL and ganglion cells), and inner plexiform layer.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Nine areas on the ETDRS grid of the left eye

Parameter measurements

Each parameter was evaluated according to its location on the ETDRS grid extracted from OCT machine (Fig. 1). The subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was manually measured according to a vertical line perpendicular to the outer border of the hyperreflective retinal pigmented epithelium to the inner border of the choroid–sclera interface, defined as the inner hyperreflective band of sclera underneath the fovea. To determine the parafoveal choroidal thickness, three further measurements were performed every 1000 µm temporally from the center of the fovea (T1, T2, T3) and three more nasal measurements (N1, N2, N3). All the measurement was performed by two well-trained physicians (BA and DS) who were masked. The outer retinal layer (ORL) was measured from the inner nuclear layer to the inner border of the retinal epithelium.

Data analysis and statistics

Sample size estimation was calculated from the mean of choroidal thickness using the formula of n = Z21-α/2σ2/d2 with α = 0.05, σ = 84 microns and d = 2. The estimate sample size was 81 eyes. Baseline characteristics of subjects were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The categorical data are shown in percent, whereas continuous data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). The means of each retinal and choroidal layer were calculated for all nine regions of the ETDRS grid. The difference between the mean CTs in two subgroups was analyzed using an independent t-test. Analysis of variance was used to compare more than two subgroups. Analysis of covariance was applied to compare differences in RTs and CTs between the two sexes, with age as the covariate. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to evaluate bivariate correlations. The relations between macular RT and CT and sex, age, and spherical equivalence were investigated by linear and stepwise multiple regression analyses. Inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated between the two evaluators using the intraclass correlation coefficient for each variable measured. All statistical analyses were evaluated at a significance level of 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Altogether, 144 eyes from 144 healthy subjects were included in the study. The demographic data of all subjects are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline demographic data for the 144 subjects in this study

Characteristic Value
Female sex 115 (80%)
Age (years) 41 ± 13 years (18–85 years)
Age group (years)
 18–30 36 (25%); 63.9% female
 31–40 31 (21.4%); 77.4% female
 41–50 38 (26.4%); 86.8% female
 51–60 31 (21.5%); 86.5% female
 ≥61 8 (5.6%); 100% female
BCVA score 84.2 ± 6.4 (61–99)
SE −0.2 ± 1.2 D
Open in a new tab

Data are given as the number (%), mean ± SD, and/or the range

BCVA best corrected visual acuity, SE spherical equivalent

Retinal, NFL, GCC, and choroidal thickness in healthy subjects

The mean RT for all 144 eyes was 282.4 ± 13.8 µm (range 241.1–321.2 µm). The mean RT for each layer and the CTs are shown in Table 2. The distinct topographical variation of the retina in different regions and thickness patterns (Appendix) shows that RT increased in the following order: central foveal, outer nasal, outer inferior, outer superior, outer temporal, inner nasal, inner inferior, inner superior, and inner temporal regions. Among the nine independent regions, the central foveal region had the thinnest layer. The inner region had a thicker layer than the outer region of the retinal layer, the GCC, and the choroidal layer. The thickness of the NFL, however, shows an inverse pattern, so the outer region was thicker than the inner region. The temporal area had a thicker NFL than the nasal region (mean differences of 26.1 µm and 3.0 µm for the outer and inner regions, respectively: p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, paired t-test).

Table 2.

Thicknesses of the layers of each region of the ETDRS grid (n = 144)

Region Retina Nerve fiber Ganglion cell complex Outer retina Choroid
Total 282.4 ± 13.8 29.7 ± 2.9 74.8 ± 6.2 178.1 ± 8.7 257.0 ± 64.3
oSUP 276.2 ± 14.4 40.2 ± 4.4 67.3 ± 6.1 168.7 ± 8.3 266.5 ± 68.2
iSUP 309.5 ± 16.5 27.2 ± 2.4 90.9 ± 8.6 191.4 ± 10.1 269.6 ± 66.9
oTEM 291.7 ± 15.5 50.1 ± 6.2 73.5 ± 6.2 168.8 ± 12.6 221.8 ± 68.4
iTEM 309.9 ± 16.9 25.2 ± 2.2 90.2 ± 8.9 194.4 ± 10.3 262.5 ± 74.5
oINF 263.6 ± 13.5 42.7 ± 5.4 63.3 ± 5.2 158.2 ± 11.4 251.8 ± 70.2
iINF 307.3 ± 15.6 29.0 ± 2.5 90.9 ± 8.2 187.4 ± 9.4 265.8 ± 78.5
oNAS 258.0 ± 13.0 24.0 ± 1.2 69.0 ± 5.9 165.3 ± 10.4 245.5 ± 64.8
iNAS 297.2 ± 15.6 22.3 ± 1.3 85.8 ± 8.0 188.3 ± 12.4 263.6 ± 70.4
Subfoveal CT 227.9 ± 20.7 5.4 ± 2.7 42.4 ± 8.5 180.6 ± 15.6 265.5 ± 74.2
Open in a new tab

Values are the mean ± SD in micrometers (μm)

ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, CF central fovea, oSUP outer superior region, iSUP inner superior region, oTEM outer temporal region, iTEM inner temporal region, oINF outer inferior region, iINF inner inferior region, oNAS outer nasal region, iNAS inner nasal region, CT choroidal thickness

The overall mean macular NFL and GCC thicknesses were 29.7 ± 2.9 µm and 74.8 ± 6.2 µm, respectively, and correlations with the total RT were 0.489 (p < 0.001) and 0.836 (p < 0.001), respectively. The correlation between the NFL and GCC thicknesses was 0.582 (p < 0.001). The temporal area had thicker NFL than the nasal area, with a mean difference of 23.7 µm (p < 0.001). The average ORL thickness was 178 ± 8.7 µm, the correlation of which with the total retinal layer was 0.818 (p < 0.001).

The mean total CT from all areas of the ETDRS grid was 257.0 ± 64.3 µm (range 86.9– 427.0 µm). The correlation between the CT and RT was 0.135 (p = 0.108). There was no correlation between the CT and the NFL or GCC (p = 0.797 and p = 0.727, respectively). The choroid exhibited a distribution pattern different from that of the retinal layers, with the central foveal segment of the choroid not the thinnest sector. The mean foveal CT was 265.5 ± 74.2 µm. The mean thickness of the CT in the macular region varied from thinner to thicker as follows: outer temporal, outer nasal, outer inferior, inner temporal, inner nasal, central fovea, inner inferior, outer superior, and inner superior region. The choroidal layer was thickest in the superior subfield, followed by that in the inferior, nasal, and temporal subfields. Compared with the nasal area, the foveal temporal area was thicker, with mean differences of 23.7 µm and 1.1 µm for the outer and inner regions, respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.747, respectively; paired t-test).

Effects of sex, age, and spherical equivalence on normal retina, NFL, GCC, and choroidal thickness

In the subgroup analysis, the mean RT and the thickness of the NFL, GGC, ORL, and choroid in the men were 289.6 ± 13.4, 29.9 ± 1.6, 77.9 ± 5.5, 182.3 ± 9.3, and 280.1 ± 61.9 μm, respectively. In the women, the corresponding measurements were 280.5 ± 13.3, 29.7 ± 2.7, 74.1 ± 6.1, 177.1 ± 8.3, and 251.1 ± 60.8 μm, respectively. The total retina, GCC, and ORL were slightly thicker in the men than in the women. Similarly, the choroid was significantly thicker in the men than in the women (p = 0.027), although there was no statistically significant difference in the thickness of the NFL in the men and women (p = 0.770). Comparisons of the thickness of the retina, NFL, GCC, and choroid across the various age groups are shown in Table 3. Although there was prominent age-related reduction in choroid thickness, it seems that NFL thickness does not significantly decrease with age.

Table 3.

Thickness of the layers of the components of the eye, by age group

Layer 18–30 Years (n = 36) 31–40 Years (n = 31) 41–50 Years (n = 38) 51–60 Years (n = 31) >60 Years (n = 8) p a
RT 289.5 ± 10.5 281.6 ± 14.0 279.4 ± 14.7 282.0 ± 12.4 282.4 ± 13.8 <0.001
NFL 30.4 ± 1.7 29.3 ± 2.4 29.9 ± 3.9 29.6 ± 3.0 29.7 ± 2.9 0.300
GCC 77.4 ± 3.9 73.5 ± 6.3 74.6 ± 6.2 74.5 ± 6.8 74.8 ± 6.2 0.020
ORL 182.3 ± 8.1 178.8 ± 9.3 175.6 ± 8.5 177.9 ± 7.2 169.6 ± 6.2 <0.001
CT 284.2 ± 73.0 254.3 ± 56.8 264.7 ± 45.3 233.4 ± 61.8 199.5 ± 79.5 0.001
Open in a new tab

Values are the mean ± SD in micrometers (μm)

RT retina, NFL nerve fiber layer, GCC ganglion cell complex, ORL outer retinal layer, CT subfoveal choroidal thickness

aAnalysis of variance

The linear regression analysis showed that age and female sex were significantly negatively correlated with the thickness of the retina, GCC, ORL, and choroid but not the NFL (Appendix). The spherical equivalent was significantly negatively correlated with the thickness of the retina, NFL, GCC, but not the choroid and ORL. After adjusting for every factor with the stepwise multiple regression analysis, age and sex still showed significant correlations with the retina, ORL, and choroid but not the NFL. Only sex, not age, showed the significant correlation with the GCC. The spherical equivalent, however, shows a significant correlation only for the GCC. The mean CT showed a negative correlation with age (p < 0.001), with a regression coefficient of r2 = 0.097. With the regression formula, the mean CT decreased approximately 1.5 μm for each year’s increase in age.

CT by manual measurement

The intraclass correlation coefficient between 2 observers for SFCT and parafoveal choroidal thickness was 0.925 (95% confidence interval 0.919–0.931). The mean SFCT determined by manual line measurement was 326.0 ± 86.2 µm. There was a good correlation between the CT and SFCT thickness (r = 0.736, p < 0.001). An obvious age-related reduction was shown in the CT (Table 3). The mean CT determined by manual evaluation at N3 (3000 µm nasally from the foveal center) was 199.3 µm, N2 (2000 μm nasally from the foveal center) 262.6 µm, N1 (1000 µm nasally from the foveal center) 305.4 µm, T1 (1000 µm temporally from the foveal center) 318.7 µm, T2 (2000 µm temporally from the foveal center) 326.0 μm, and T3 (3000 µm temporally from the foveal center) 301.7 µm. The regression analysis found that the CT decreased significantly with age at peripheral measuring points (>1000 µm from the subfoveal point), whereas the decrement was minimal (without statistical significance) within the central 1000 µm area. The correlation of age and CT at locations N3, N2, N1, SFCT, T1, T2, and T3 were −0.224 (p < 0.001), −0.140 (p = 0.018), −0.098 (p = 0.095), −0.064 (p = 0.278), −0.076 (p = 0.20), −0.159 (p = 0.007), and −0.198 (p = 0.001), respectively.

Discussion

The present study provided a normal reference value for CT measured by the SS-OCT in an adult Thai population. To our knowledge, it is the first study to determine the baseline thickness of the choroid of healthy Thai volunteers using SS-OCT with the ETDRS grid and to assess the relations among clinical variables including sex, age, spherical equivalence, and thickness of the retina, NFL, and GCC. SS-OCT, which projects longer wavelengths (allowing better penetration through pigmented tissues), more clearly shows the choroidal layer [29]. The choroid–sclera interface can be clearly demonstrated in 100% of eyes using SS-OCT compared with 73.6% in the SD-OCT with EDI [30]. Measurement of the retina, ganglion cell-related layers (GCC), and choroid were automatically provided by SS-OCT with confirmed reliability of measurement, especially for the choroid [31, 32].

Many studies have reported measuring the CT of healthy adult subjects using SS-OCT (Table 4). Although there were no statistically significant differences or correlations of the CT among ethnic groups reported in the previous studies [12, 33], in addition, Asians tended to have thinner CT than Caucasians. In addition to ethnicity, the factors that affect CT are age, sex, and the set point for measuring the outer border of the choroidal layer.

Table 4.

Choroidal thickness of healthy adult subjects assessed using SS-OCT by different studies

Study Eyes (n) Male sex (%) Age (years) SFCT CT, from line scan Foveal CT by ETDRS Outer border of the choroid Scan mode
Wakatsuki et al. [46], Japan 115 54 NA 270.6 ± 71.5 NA NA Hyporeflective line of SCI Raster scans
Wang et al. [52], China 146 68 47.9 ± 14.0 NA NA 276.7 ± 112.4 Automatic segmentation Raster scan with ETDRS grid (6 × 6 mm)
Michalewski et al. [44], Poland 122 43 43.0 ± 17.0 259.0 NA 221 Line representing the lamina suprachoroidea, outer hyperreflective line of the choroid Raster scan with ETDRS grid (6 × 6 mm)
Ruiz-Medrano et al. [24], Spain 140 57 25.4 ± 19.9 312.1 ± 76.2 NA NA Outer aspect of the lamina fusca 12 mm Line scan
Ruiz-Medrano et al. [11], Spain 169 NA 33.5 ± 24.9 305.8 ± 80.6 278.2 ± 63.9 NA Outer aspect of the lamina fusca 12 mm Line scan
Ruiz-Medrano et al. [23], Spain 276 59 33.5 ± 24.9 301.9 ± 80.5 258.7 ± 64.6 NA Outer aspect of the lamina fusca 12 mm Line scan
Moussa et al. [47], Egypt 129 49 36.9 ± 14.2 319.7 ± 76.5 NA 300.9 ± 72.3 SCI 12 mm Line scan and 12 radial scans with ETDRS grid (6 × 6 mm)
Athkar et al. [53], India 230 53 44.0 ± 29.0 307.0 ± 79.0 285 ± 75 NA SCI 12 mm Horizontal, vertical, and radial scan
Open in a new tab

Values are the mean ± SD in micrometers (μm)

SFCT subfoveal choroidal thickness, CT choroidal thickness, ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, SCI sclera–choroid interface, NA not available

In this study, the mean SFCT was approximately 326 µm by SS-OCT, whereas the mean SFCT was 294 µm and 279 µm by SD-OCT EDI, as reported by Phasukkijwatana et al. [34] and Jirarattanasopa et al. [35], respectively. The loss of SFCT predicted by our study was 0.85 μm per year, whereas it was 1.22 μm and 2.67 μm per year, respectively. Those two studies used the same ethnic population but with different OCT modalities and did not control the refractive error, which allows bias in the mean SFCT. Zafar et al. [36]. and Copete et al. [37], however, reported no significant differences in the CT measured with SS-OCT and SD-OCT [36, 37]. In contrast, Matsuo et al. [38] showed that CT measurements using SS-OCT were slightly greater than those obtained using SD-OCT. This is possible because SS-OCT gives higher-quality images on which the outer choroidal border could be identified at the outer aspect of the choroid–sclera interface, rather than the outer limit of the choroidal vessels.

In the current study, the patient’s sex was associated with CT, and the mean CT was thicker in men than in women, with statistical significance (280.1 vs. 251.1 μm). Population-based studies have also shown that men have thicker CT than women [18, 37–41]. This difference may be explained by the higher basal sympathetic tone in women, which might cause vasoconstriction due to activation of sympathetic α-adrenoceptors [42, 43]. The relation between patient’s sex and CT is still controversial. Previous publications demonstrated an independent association between age, sex, axial length, myopic refractive error, and the CT [18, 40, 44]. It has also been reported, however, that older age, female sex, greater axial length, and high myopic refractive error are associated with thinner CT.

In the present study, a linear regression analysis showed a distinct age-related reduction in the mean CT, with a significant negative correlation between the two. Age was significantly correlated with the thickness of the choroid after adjusting for sex and spherical equivalence. The decrease in CT is correlated with a histopathologically proved decrease in vascular density and decreased choriocapillaris diameter [45]. This finding was consistent with those in other studies [18, 40, 41]. As a result, in elderly individuals, retinal pigment epithelium and the outer retina including photoreceptors may receive less oxygen and other metabolites, which could lead to various age-related retinal diseases. The degenerative changes might preserve the subfoveal region as it is an important area for vision. Ramrattan et al. [45] also reported histological decreases in the choriocapillaris and choroidal capillary lumen in normal human macula with AMD. Interestingly, CT is significantly negatively correlated with age, while SFCT is not. It is notable, however, the single-point choroidal measurements may provide misleading indications of choroidal changes. Thus, a mean CT or multipoint evaluation of the choroid is suggested when evaluating foveal CT.

The choroid was thickest at the foveal center and then decreased as measurements moved away (>1000 μm) from the center, occurring more prominently on the nasal side than on the temporal side. A similar profile pattern was described in previous studies [23, 37]. Hence, the SFCT tended to be thicker than the mean CT [46–48]. One should be aware of whether the mean CT or the SFCT is being reported when comparing CTs among studies. The mean CT and SFCT have a tendency to become thinner with increasing age, although without statistical significance. However, the stronger correlation was better observed at the point measured closer to the fovea on both the temporal and nasal sides. Ruiz-Medrano et al. [23] reported a high correlation between age and CT measured 1000 μm distance from the foveal center. This correlation, however, was found to be stronger the farther away the CT measurements were temporally from the foveal center.

We believe that this is the first study in an Asian population using SS-OCT to evaluate CT in the macular region. CT in the parafoveal region is important to determine the pachychoroid disease spectrum that was reported by Gallego-Pinazo et al. [49]. The non-subfoveal choroidal thickness might be important in the pachychoroid syndrome reported by Phasukkijwatana et al. [50], who showed that nasal choroid is thicker than temporal choroid.

The main strength of the present study is the measurement of CT shown by both automated segmentation and manual measurement. Furthermore, there were negative correlation of subfoveal CT and parafoveal CT with age. This study gave provided the results of OCT measurement thickness of whole retina layer, NFL and GCL; which can use as normal references number of retina layer thickness, foveal, and parafoveal regions measuring by SS-OCT in adult Asian population.

There were, however, some limitations of this study. First, the proportion of men and women was not equivalent, with approximately 80% of the subjects being women. As previous population-based studies have also shown that men have thicker CT than women, the value of mean CT from the current study may underestimate the real mean CT thickness. Second, this study primarily focused on an adult population, and hence the normal reference for CT in a pediatric Thai population is still unknown. Third, choroidal thickness value can be varied because of manual measurement by different persons. However, the intraclass correlation showed excellent reliability [51]. Fourth, other factors which might be correlated to CT were not included in our study, such as diurnal variation and body mass index. Furthermore, undiagnosed diabetic patients can unintentionally be included in the current study as the recruitment process was done by chart review, not including blood sugar test.

In conclusion, age and sex significantly influence CT. The macular CT in a healthy eye diminishes with age which there were higher negative correlation for the CT with the distant form foveal center. Men are prone to have a thicker CT than women. In addition, the SFCT was thicker than the mean CT. Parafoveal CT should be evaluated to identify specific retinal–choroidal diseases.

Summary

What was known before

  • Choroidal thickness in Asians tended to be thinner compared to Caucasians.

  • Choroidal thickness decreases with age.

What this study adds

  • Foveal and parafoveal structure of choroid in the Thai population.

  • The thinning of choroidal associated with aging started from parafoveal area and affected mean choroidal thickness, while subfoveal choroidal thickness has less effect.

Supplementary information

Appendix 1-5 (66.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Nancy Schatkenfrom Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Topcon Instrument, Thailand. Ltd. The company had no part in setting up the study design analysis or in overseeing the results in the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (10.1038/s41433-019-0404-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Imamura Y, Fujiwara T, Margolis R, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2009;29:1469–73. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181be0a83 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Maruko I, Iida T, Sugano Y, Ojima A, Sekiryu T. Subfoveal choroidal thickness in fellow eyes of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2011;31:1603–8. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820f4b39 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Ma, L, Tang SM, Rong SS, Chen H, Young AL, Kumaramanickavel G, et al. Association of PEDF polymorphisms with age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9497. 10.1038/srep09497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Wood A, Binns A, Margrain T, Drexler W, Povazay B, Esmaeelpour M, et al. Retinal and choroidal thickness in early age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:1030–8.e2. 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Koizumi H, Yamagishi T, Yamazaki T, Kawasaki R, Kinoshita S. Subfoveal choroidal thickness in typical age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1123–8. 10.1007/s00417-011-1620-1 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Bittencourt MG, Kherani S, Ferraz DA, Ansari M, Nasir H, Sepah YJ, et al. Variation of choroidal thickness and vessel diameter in patients with posterior non-infectious uveitis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2014;4:14. 10.1186/s12348-014-0014-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Fujiwara T, Imamura Y, Margolis R, Slakter JS, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:445–50. 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.029 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Chen W, Wang Z, Zhou X, Li B, Zhang H. Choroidal and photoreceptor layer thickness in myopic population. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22:590–7. 10.5301/ejo.5000092 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Cennamo G, Finelli M, Iaccarino G, de Crecchio G, Cennamo G. Choroidal thickness in open-angle glaucoma measured by spectral-domain scanning laser ophthalmoscopy/optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica. 2012;228:47–52. 10.1159/000336903 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Maul EA, Friedman DS, Chang DS, Boland MV, Ramulu PY, Jampel HD, et al. Choroidal thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography: factors affecting thickness in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1571–9. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Ruiz-Medrano J, Flores-Moreno I, Pena-Garcia P, Montero JA, Garcia-Feijoo J, Duker JS, et al. Analysis of age-related choroidal layers thinning in healthy eyes using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2017;37:1305–13. 10.1097/iae.0000000000001347 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Bafiq R, Mathew R, Pearce E, Abdel-Hey A, Richardson M, Bailey T, et al. Age, sex, and ethnic variations in inner and outer retinal and choroidal thickness on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160:1034–43.e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.027 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Han YS, Lim HB, Lee SH, Kim JY. Diurnal variation in choroidal and retinal thickness of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study macular subfields determined using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica. 2015;233:192–7. 10.1159/000375538 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Novais EA, Badaro E, Allemann N, Morales MS, Rodrigues EB, de Souza Lima R, et al. Correlation between choroidal thickness and ciliary artery blood flow velocity in normal subjects. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2015;46:920–4. 10.3928/23258160-20151008-04 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Abbey AM, Kuriyan AE, Modi YS, Thorell MR, Nunes RP, Goldhardt R, et al. Optical coherence tomography measurements of choroidal thickness in healthy eyes: correlation with age and axial length. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2015;46:18–24. 10.3928/23258160-20150101-03 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.El-Shazly AA, Farweez YA, ElSebaay ME, El-Zawahry WMA. Correlation between choroidal thickness and degree of myopia assessed with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27:577–84. 10.5301/ejo.5000936 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Tan KA, Gupta P, Agarwal A, Chhablani J, Cheng CY, Keane PA, et al. State of science: choroidal thickness and systemic health. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61:566–81. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Wei WB, Xu L, Jonas JB, Shao L, Du KF, Wang S, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:175–80. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.048 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Performance of fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2003;11:889–94. 10.1364/OE.11.000889 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozonni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:496–500. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Wang Z, Reisman C, Liu J, Chan K. Introduction to swept source OCT. In: Michalewska Z, Nawrocki J, editors. Atlas of swept source optical coherence tomography. Cham: Springer; 2017. p.1–8
  • 22.Unterhuber A, Povazay B, Hermann B, Sattmann H, Chavez-Pirson A & Drexler W. In vivo retinal optical coherence tomography at 1040 nm - enhanced penetration into the choroid. Opt Express. 2005;13:3252–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Ruiz-Medrano J, Flores-Moreno I, Pena-Garcia P, Montero JA, Duker JS & Ruiz-Moreno JM. Macular choroidal thickness profile in a healthy population measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:3532–42. 10.1167/iovs.14-13868 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 24.Ruiz-Medrano, J, Flores-Moreno I, Pena-Garcia P, Montero JA, Duker JS & Ruiz-Moreno JM. Asymmetry in macular choroidal thickness profile between both eyes in a healthy population measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2015;35:2067–73. 10.1097/iae.0000000000000590 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.Rhodes LA, Huisingh C, Johnstone J, Fazio MA, Smith B, Wang L, et al. Peripapillary choroidal thickness variation with age and race in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:1872–9. 10.1167/iovs.14-16179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Bahrami B, Ewe SYP, Hong T, Zhu M, Ong G, Luo K, et al. Influence of retinal pathology on the reliability of macular thickness measurement: a comparison between optical coherence tomography devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2017;48:319–25. 10.3928/23258160-20170329-06 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Modjtahedi S, Chiou C, Modjtahedi B, Telander DG, Morse LS & Park SS. Comparison of macular thickness measurement and segmentation error rate between stratus and fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41:301–10. 10.3928/15428877-20100430-02 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28.Stanga PE, Tsamis E, Papayannis A, Stringa F, Cole, T & Jalil A. Swept-source optical coherence tomography Angio (Topcon Corp, Japan): technology review. Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;56:13–17. 10.1159/000442771 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Ruiz-Moreno JM, Flores-Moreno I, Lugo F, Ruiz-Medrano J, Montero JA & Akiba M. Macular choroidal thickness in normal pediatric population measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:353–9. 10.1167/iovs.12-10863 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30.Adhi M, Liu JJ, Qavi AH, Grulkowski I, Lu CD, Mohler KJ, et al. Choroidal analysis in healthy eyes using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:1272–81.e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Zhang L, Buitendijk GH, Lee K, Sonka M, Springelkamp H, Hofman A, et al. Validity of automated choroidal segmentation in SS-OCT and SD-OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:3202–11. 10.1167/iovs.14-15669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Philip AM, Gerendas BS, Zhang L, Faatz H, Podkowinski D, Bogunovic H, et al. Choroidal thickness maps from spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography: algorithmic versus ground truth annotation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1372–6. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Karapetyan A, Ouyang P, Tang LS, Gemilyan M. Choroidal thickness in relation to ethnicity measured using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2016;36:82–90. 10.1097/iae.0000000000000654 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Phasukkijwatana N, Thaweerattanasilp W, Laotaweerungsawat S, Rodanant N, Singalavanija A, Tanterdtham J, et al. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the choroid in Thai population. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014;97:947–53. [PubMed]
  • 35.Jirarattanasopa P, Panon N, Hiranyachattada S, Bhurayanontachai P. The normal choroidal thickness in southern Thailand. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:2209–13. 10.2147/opth.s71343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Zafar S, Siddiqui MR, Shahzad R. Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:2271–6. 10.2147/opth.s117022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Copete S, Flores-Moreno I, Montero JA, Duker JS, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:334–8. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303904 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Matsuo Y, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Tomita M, Shirasawa M & Terasaki H. Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:7630–6. 10.1167/iovs.13-13135 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Gupta P, Jing T, Marziliano P, Cheung CY, Baskaran M, Lamoureux EL, et al. Distribution and determinants of choroidal thickness and volume using automated segmentation software in a population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:293–301.e3. 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.034 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 40.Barteselli G, Chhablani J, El-Emam S, Wang H, Chuang J, Kozak I, et al. Choroidal volume variations with age, axial length, and sex in healthy subjects: a three-dimensional analysis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2572–8. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Tuncer I, Karahan E, Zengin MO, Atalay E, Polat N. Choroidal thickness in relation to sex, age, refractive error, and axial length in healthy Turkish subjects. Int Ophthalmol. 2015;35:403–10. 10.1007/s10792-014-9962-4 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 42.Cooke JP, Creager MA, Osmundson PJ, Shepherd JT. Sex differences in control of cutaneous blood flow. Circulation. 1990;82:1607–15. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 43.Ovet G, Alpfidan I, Sakarya Y, Sakarya R, Ozcimen M, Goktas S, et al. The acute effect of pseudoephedrine on choroidal thickness. Clin Ter. 2016;167:63–66. 10.7417/ct.2016.1927 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 44.Michalewski J, Michalewska Z, Nawrocka Z, Bednarski M, Nawrocki J. Correlation of choroidal thickness and volume measurements with axial length and age using swept source optical coherence tomography and optical low-coherence reflectometry. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:639160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Ramrattan RS, van der Schaft TL, Mooy CM, de Bruijn WC, Mulder PG & de Jong PT. Morphometric analysis of Bruch’s membrane, the choriocapillaris, and the choroid in aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2857–64. [PubMed]
  • 46.Wakatsuki Y, Shinojima A, Kawamura A, Yuzawa M. Correlation of aging and segmental choroidal thickness measurement using swept source optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0144156. 10.1371/journal.pone.0144156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Moussa M, Sabry D, Soliman W. Macular choroidal thickness in normal Egyptians measured by swept source optical coherence tomography. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Ding X, et al. Choroidal thickness in healthy Chinese subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:9555–60. 10.1167/iovs.11-8076 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 49.Gallego-Pinazo R, Dolz-Marco R, Gómez-Ulla F, Mrejen S, Freund KB. Pachychoroid diseases of the macula. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2014;3:111. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Phasukkijwatana N, Freund KB, Dolz-Marco R, Al-Sheikh M, Keane PA, Egan CA, et al. Peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome. Retina. 2018;38:1652–67. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 51.Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Wang J, Gao X, Huang W, Wang W, Chen S, Du S, et al. Swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging of macular retinal and choroidal structures in healthy eyes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:122. 10.1186/s12886-015-0110-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Akhtar Z, Rishi P, Srikanth R, Rishi E, Bhende M & Raman R. Choroidal thickness in normal Indian subjects using Swept source optical coherence tomography. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197457. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 1-5 (66.5KB, docx)

Articles from Eye are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES