Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2020 Jan 6;6(1):e03152. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03152

Knowledge, attitude and practices of the resident community about visceral leishmaniasis in West Armachiho district, Northwest Ethiopia

Habtamu Tamrat Melkamu a, Achenef Melaku Beyene b,, Desalegn Tegabu Zegeye c
PMCID: PMC7002804  PMID: 32042949

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) or kala-azar is a tropical disease, which is caused by an obligate intracellular parasite of the genus Leishmania. It is transmitted by the bite of an infected phlebotomine sand fly. The disease is endemic in northwest part of Ethiopia particularly in areas bordering Sudan. Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the community is helpful to design and implement appropriate control and prevention strategies. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the KAP of the resident community on VL in West Armachiho district, northwest Ethiopia. Data were collected by using pretested and well-structured questionnaire. Two villages (Abderafi and Abrehajira) were selected randomly. Households engaged in the study were selected by systematic random sampling method and then finally, simple random sampling was used to engage a maximum of two individuals per household. A total of 422 participants were engaged in the study. Almost all participants heard about VL. The source of information was mainly from friends (80.8%). The highest proportion (88.2%) of participants thought that persistent enlargement of liver and spleen (enlargement of the abdomen) was the main symptom of VL. Of all participants, only 52.1% knew sand fly as the vector of the disease. The overall assessment of participants indicated that 21.1% were knowledgeable, 53.6% had positive attitudes and 14.9% had optimal practices on VL. In conclusion, the survey indicated that participants had better attitude about VL. However, there were a large gap in knowledge and practices. The misunderstanding and incorrect practices may remain serious concerns in the control and prevention of the disease. It is recommended that health education program should be strengthened to increase peoples’ awareness and improve their practices on VL in the district and further studies are strongly suggested for better understanding of the dynamics of the disease in the area.

Keywords: Public health, Parasitology, Internal medicine, Practice, Attitude, Knowledge, Visceral leishmaniasis, West armachiho district, Northwest Ethiopia


Public health; Parasitology; Internal medicine; Practice; Attitude; Knowledge; Visceral leishmaniasis; West armachiho district, Northwest Ethiopia.

1. Introduction

Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL), commonly known as kala-azar, is a tropical disease, caused by a protozoal parasite that belongs to the genus Leishmania. The disease is endemic in 88 countries, approximately 50,000 to 90,000 new cases are recorded per annum and more than 350 million people are at risk in the world (Gomes et al., 2008; WHO, 2019). Human infection occurs when Leishmania parasites are injected into the dermis as the metacyclic promastigote life stage following the bite of an infected female phlebotomine sand fly. Then, the parasite enters the macrophages, where it multiplies and establishes the infection. Once in the blood, the parasite induces a systemic illness which is characterized by fever, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, pancytopenia, weight loss, weakness and death (if untreated) (Chappuis et al., 2007). In addition to human, the parasite also infects wild and domestic animals like dogs, that can act as a potential source for human infection (Chappuis et al., 2007; Lemma, 2018; WHO, 2019).

East Africa is one of the most important foci of VL in the world, characterized by sustained endemic transmission in several geographic sites, and intermittent epidemics often associated with population displacement and conflicts (Al-salem et al., 2016). VL has also been linked to the existence of poor housing, suitable environmental habitats for the vector, immunosuppression, and lack of personal protective measures (Alvar et al., 2006). Environmental changes can also alter the dynamics of vectors and reservoirs which may increase human exposure to the disease (Oryan and Akbari, 2016).

Ethiopia is one of the endemic areas for VL (Wasunna et al., 2016). In the country, over 3.2 million people are at risk and up to 4000 new cases are estimated per year. Historically, VL was known as the disease of the lowland agroecological zones in the country. Among the nine regions and two city administrations in the country, the highest prevalence occurs in Amhara Regional State followed by Tigray and Southern Nations Nationalities Peoples Regional State (Assefa, 2018). The disease is also highly prevalent in northwest part of Ethiopia, particularly in areas bordering Sudan (Gadisa et al., 2015). VL incidence is rising with the migration of people for labour, climatic and environmental changes, and the impairment of immunity due to HIV/AIDS or malnutrition (Leta et al., 2014; Mulat et al., 2014; Alemayehu et al., 2017).

To apply successful prevention and control programs, it is essential to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of the community regarding the disease (Lopez-Perea et al., 2014). Notably, studying the community's KAP allow exploring the possibility of misconceptions or misunderstandings or malpractices about the disease that may create obstacles on the control and prevention activities. Prior to planning any intervention activities, it is crucial to assess the KAP of the community. Lack of information about VL is a significant shortcoming and hindering factor for the prevention and treatment practices in the West Armachiho district of North Gondar, Amhara regional state, since the district is one of the most remote areas in the country where no research has been conducted so far on the issue. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the KAPs of the resident community regarding VL in the West Armachiho district, Amhara Regional State, northwest Ethiopia.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study area

The study was conducted from February to May 2015, in the West Armachiho district of the Amhara Regional State in the northwest part of Ethiopia (Figure 1). The district is found in North Gondar zone, bordering on the South by Metema, on the West by Sudan, on the North by Tegede, and on the East by Tach Armachiho. The average minimum and maximum temperature of the area are about 22.1–36.3 °C, respectively, with daily highest temperature in March, April and May. The area receives its main rainfall in July and August with precipitation ranges from 900 to 1800 mmHg. The total population of the district was about 40,991 (CSA, 2013).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of Ethiopia, Amhara Regional State and West Armachiho district.

2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Individuals aged 18 years and above, living in the West Armachiho district for more than or equal to six months were included in the study whereas individuals who were less than 18 years old, living in the area for less than 6 months, seriously ill or unable to respond were excluded from the study.

2.3. Study design, sample size and sampling techniques

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the district. The sample size was calculated by using a formula stated by Thrusfield (2007), assuming 50% of individuals had knowledge about disease, at 95% confidence level and 0.05 margins of error. Hence, the calculated sample size was 384 and by considering a 10% non-response rate and to increase precision, the final sample size was increased to 422. The number of individuals in each selected village was calculated using the statistical formula stated in Thrusfield (2007) by accepting a 5% error for the questionnaire-based survey.

A three-stage sampling strategy was employed to collect the required data. First, from the nine villages in the district, two villages (Abderafi and Abrehajira) were selected by a simple random sampling technique. Households were selected by systematic random sampling method within selected villages, and then finally, individuals engaged in the study were selected by simple random sampling technique from the selected household (maximum of 2 individuals per household).

2.4. Data collection

The data were collected by using a well-structured, pretested and evaluated questionnaire. The questionnaire addressed demographic characteristics, the level of knowledge, the source of information where people had learned about VL, knowledge on symptom of VL, mode of transmission, attitude and practices. Two data collectors were trained on the study objectives, questions in the questionnaire, extent of explanations and also how to keep confidentiality.

2.5. Scoring

The knowledge, attitude and practice of participants were scored based on the techniques described by Alemu et al. (2013) and Berhe et al. (2018). Briefly, each correct response was given a score of one, while a wrong or unsure response was scored zero. The knowledge scores were ranged from zero to eight. Knowledge scores between zero and four were considered as “Not knowledgeable”, while scores between five and eight were considered as “Knowledgeable”. Similarly, the attitude towards VL was scored from zero to six. Attitude scores between zero and three was considered as “Unfavourable”, whereas scores from four to six were considered as “Favourable”. Finally, the practice was assessed using a five-item questionnaire and participants scoring more than two were considered as having “Optimal” practices regarding VL.

2.6. Quality control

The structured questionnaires were pre-tested in the district on 10% of the subjects and checked for completeness, clarity, sensitiveness and consistency of questions in the questionnaire. Finally, corrections were done accordingly before commencing the actual data collection. The principal investigator had also checked the completeness of the collected data.

2.7. Data analysis

The data entry, editing, and cleaning were carried out using Microsoft software. The data were subsequently transferred into EPI-INFO and SPSS statistical softwares for analysis. Then, frequencies were used to check for outliers and clean the data. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics and bivariate logistic regressions. The latter was employed to identify the potentially important explanatory variables.

2.8. Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review board of the University of Gondar. A formal supporting letter explaining objectives, rationale and expected outcomes of the study was then written and presented to the West Armachiho district administration from the Institute of Public Health, at the University of Gondar. Officials were contacted and permission was secured at all levels. Before the interview, the study was explained to them and were asked for verbal consent. Those individuals, who agreed to participate were interviewed about their knowledge, attitude and practices towards VL. To assure confidentiality, the information was kept anonymous.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic characteristics of the participants

A total of 422 participants were included in the study. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the participants. Age ranges from 34 to 41 years (30.3%), married (50.0%), Orthodox Christian (74.4%), farmer (37.4%) and grade 9–12 (35.8%) were the dominant demographic features. Most of the participants did not possess television (85.1%) or radio (86. 5%).

Table 1.

Socio-economic demographic characteristics of participants.

Variables Participants
Male (n = 228) Female (n = 194) Total (n = 422)
Age (years)
 18–25 26 (11.4%) 16 (8.2%) 42 (10.0%)
 26–33 62 (27.2%) 53 (27.3%) 115 (27.3%)
 34–41 58 (25.4%) 70 (36.1%) 128 (30.3%)
 42–49 62 (27.2%) 41 (21.1%) 103 (24.4%)
 ≥50 20 (8.8%) 14 (7.2%) 34 (8.1%)

Marital Status
 Unmarried/single 64 (28.1%) 51 (26.3%) 115 (27.3%)
 Married 124 (54.4%) 87 (44.8%) 211 (50.0%)
 Divorced 25 (6.6%) 40 (20.6%) 65 (15.4%)
 Widowed 15 (6.6%) 16 (8.2%) 31 (7.3%)

Religion
 Orthodox Christian 171 (75.0%) 143 (73.7%) 314 (74.4%)
 Islam 40 (17.5%) 43 (22.2%) 83 (19.7%)
 Protestant Christian 17 (7.5%) 8 (4.1%) 25 (5.9%)

Occupation
 Unemployed 9 (3.9%) 16 (8.2%) 25 (5.9%)
 Student 19 (8.3%) 22 (11.3%) 41 (9.7%)
 Civil servant 63 (27.6%) 47 (24.2%) 110 (26.1%)
 House wife 0 (0.0%) 33 (17.0%) 33 (7.8%)
 Farmer 89 (39.0%) 69 (35.6%) 158 (37.4%)
 Pensioner 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0%)
 Private worker 48 (21.1%) 7 (3.6%) 55 (13.0%)

Education
 Illiterate 46 (20.2%) 9 (4.6%) 55 (13.0%)
 No formal education but can read & write 28 (12.3%) 27 (13.9%) 55 (13.0%)
 Grade 1-8 50 (21.9%) 58 (29.9%) 108 (25.6%)
 Grade 9-12 69 (30.3%) 82 (42.3%) 151 (35.8%)
 Above grade 12 35 (15.4%) 18 (9.3%) 53 (12.6%)

Possession of television
 Yes 45 (19.7%) 18 (9.3%) 63 (14.9%)
 No 183 (80.3%) 176 (90.7%) 359 (85.1%)

Possession of radio
 Yes 28 (12.3%) 29 (14.9%) 57 (13.5%)
 No 200 (87.7%) 165 (85.1%) 365 (86.5%)

3.2. Knowledge of the community

All participants had heard about VL. The most frequent source of information was friends (80.8%), followed by pamphlet (34.1%) and health care providers (33.2%) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Number of participants by source of information about visceral leishmaniasis.

Most of the participants (88.2%) recognized persistent enlargement of liver and spleen (expressed as an enlarged abdomen) as the symptom of VL; the next most reported VL symptoms were fever (48.3%) and loss of weight (37.7%). The survey also indicated that 52.1 and 37.0% of participants knew sand fly and mosquito as means of transmission of VL infection, respectively. About 24.9% of participants considered sharing needles and tooth brush as potential transmitter of the infection. About half (53.6%) of the participants put avoiding sand fly bite could prevent the VL infection (Table 2).

Table 2.

Knowledge of resident community about visceral leishmaniasis.

Variables Sex of the Participants
Total (n = 422)
Male (n = 228) Female (n = 194)
Perception on signs and symptoms of VL
 Enlargement of spleen and liver 200 (87.7%) 172 (88.7%) 372 (88.2%)
 Fever 114 (50.0%) 90 (46.4%) 204 (48.3%)
 Loss of weight 90 (39.5%) 69 (35.5%) 159 (37.7%)
 Epistaxis/phlebitis 23 (10.1%) 19 (9.8%) 42 (10.0%)
 Loss of appetite 51 (22.4%) 49 (25.3%) 100 (23.7%)
 Abdomen pain 50 (21.9%) 34 (17.5%) 84 (19.9%)
 Shortness of breath 22 (9.6%) 15 (7.7%) 37 (8.8%)
 Coughing 36 (15.8%) 13 (6.7%) 49 (11.6%)

Transmission of VL by:
 Sand fly bites 115 (50.4%) 105 (54.1%) 220 (52.1%)
 Mosquito bites 83 (36.4%) 73 (37.6%) 156 (37.0%)
 Coughing 46 (20.2%) 42 (21.6%) 88 (20.9%)
 Sharing needles and tooth brush 68 (29.8%) 37 (19.1%) 105 (24.9%)
 Sharing utensils 121 (53.0%) 111 (57.2%) 232 (55.0%)
 Contact to infected dogs 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%

Prevention of VL transmission avoiding
 Sand fly bites 125 (54.8%) 101 (52.1%) 226 (53.6%)
 Mosquito bites 98 (43.0%) 65 (33.5%) 163 (38.6%)
 Sharing utensils 83 (36.4%) 58 (29.9%) 141 (33.4%)
 Sharing needles and tooth brush 40 (17.5%) 24 (12.4%) 64 (15.2%)

Regarding the knowledge of participants about the breeding site of sand flies, 61.1% of the participants believed that sand flies breed in muddy and dirty areas, about a quarter (26.5%) of participants didn't know the breeding place of the vector. For the biting time of the sandy flies, 54.3% of participants thought that the fly bites at midnight, whereas 27.0% and 14.0% of participants believed that biting took place during dusk and daytime, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Knowledge of participants about the vector.

Variables Sex of Participants
Total (n = 422)
Male (n = 228) Female (n = 194)
Sandy flies breed in
 Muddy and dirty areas 140 (61.4%) 118 (60.8%) 258 (61.1%)
 Field area around villages 31 (13.6%) 21 (10.8%) 52 (12.3%)
 I don't know 57 (25.0%) 55 (28.3%) 112 (26.5%)

Biting time of sand flies
 At dusk 64 (28.1%) 50 (25.8%) 114 (27.0%)
 At midnight 126 (55.2%) 103 (53.1%) 229 (54.3%)
 During the daytime 28 (12.3%) 31 (16.0%) 59 (14.0%)
 At anytime 10 (4.4%) 10 (5.1%) 20 (4.7%)

Table 4 describes the overall knowledge of participants towards VL infection. Only 21.1% of the participants were knowledgeable about VL. It was found that males (26.7%) were significantly (P < 0.05) more knowledgeable than females (14.4%). Bivariate analyses indicated that two variables (sex and residence) were significantly associated with the overall knowledge (Table 4).

Table 4.

Overall knowledge of the participants towards visceral leishmaniasis.

Variables Total number (n = 422) Knowledgeable (%) Not knowledgeable (%) Crude Odds Ratio (95%CI)
Sex
 Male 228 61 (26.7) 167 (73.3) 2.1 (1.3–3.5)
 Female 194 28 (14.4) 166 (85.6) 1

Age (years)
 18–25 42 8 (19.0) 34 (81.0) 0.9 (0.2–2.8)
 26–33 115 30 (26.1) 85 (74.9) 1.3 (0.5–3.4)
 34–41 128 24 (18.7) 104 (81.3) 0.8 (0.3–2.2)
 42–49 103 20 (19.4) 83 (80.6) 0.9 (0.3–2.4)
 ≥50 34 7 (20.6) 27 (79.4) 1

Education
 Illiterate 55 13 (23.6) 42 (76.4) 1.7 (0.6–4.6)
 No formal education but can read & write 55 12 (21.8) 43 (78.2) 1.5 (0.5–4.2)
 Grade 1-8 108 35 (32.4) 73 (67.6) 2.6 (1.1–6.3)
 Grade 9-12 151 21 (13.9) 130 (86.1) 0.9 (0.3–2.1)
 Above grade 12 53 8 (15.1) 45 (84.9) 1

Residence (village)
 Abderafi 315 75 (23.8) 240 (86.2) 1
 Abrehajira 107 14 (13.1) 93 (86.9) 0.4 (0.2–0.8)

Occupation
 Unemployed 25 7 (28) 18 (72) 1.2 (0.4–3.6)
 Student 41 8 (19.5) 33 (80.5) 0.7 (0.2–2.1)
 Civil servant 110 22 (20) 88 (80) 0.8 (0.3–1.7)
 House wife 33 0 (0.00) 33 (100) 0.9 (0.4–2.0)
 Farmer 158 39 (24.7) 119 (75.3) 1.0 (0.5–2.1)
 Private worker 55 13 (23.6) 42 (76.4) 1

3.3. Attitude of participants

Table 5 shows the attitude of participants towards VL. Their responses were organized under three categories (Agree, Disagree and Don't Know).

Table 5.

Attitude of participants towards visceral leishmaniasis.

Variables Frequency (n = 422) Percent (%)
All visceral leishmaniasis patients have HIV/AIDS?
 Agree 52 12.3
 Disagree 295 69.9
 Don't know 75 17.8

I don't mind if others know that I am infected with visceral leishmaniasis?
 Agree 296 70.1
 Disagree 86 20.4
 Don't know 40 9.5

If you found that you have visceral leishmaniasis would you tell to others?
 Agree 255 60.4
 Disagree 124 29.4
 Not sure 43 10.2

Do you feel something unusual when you see visceral leishmaniasis patients?
 Agree 207 49.1
 Disagree 199 47.2
 Not sure 16 3.8

Are you afraid of visceral leishmaniasis patients because of their illness?
 Agree 149 35.3
 Disagree 258 61.1
 Not sure 15 3.6

Visceral leishmaniasis affects the daily activities?
 Agree 276 65.4
 Disagree 136 32.2
 Don't know 10 2.4

Visceral leishmaniasis affects marital relationship?
 Agree 246 58.3
 Disagree 159 37.7
 Don't know 17 4.0

Visceral leishmaniasis affects the family responsibilities?
 Agree 273 64.7
 Disagree 134 31.8
 Don't know 15 3.6

Visceral leishmaniasis affects relationship with friends and other community members?
 Agree 194 46.0
 Disagree 213 50.5
 Don't know 15 3.6

The attitudes of the participants in different categories towards VL are presented in Table 6. In general, 53.6% of participants have positive attitude about VL. Bivariate analysis suggested that the three variables (sex, education and residence) were more associated with favourable attitude. Females (58.8%), people who didn't attend formal education but can read and write (70.9%) and residents from Abderafi (58.4%) had more favourable attitude than other categories.

Table 6.

The attitude of participants in different categories towards visceral leishmaniasis.

Variables Total number (n = 422) Favourable attitude (%) Unfavourable attitude (%) Crude Odds Ratio (95%CI)
Sex
 Male 228 112 (49.1) 116 (50.9) 0.6 (0.4–0.9)
 Female 194 114 (58.8) 80 (41.2) 1

Age (years)
 18–25 42 25 (59.5) 17 (40.5) 1.0 (0.4–2.5)
 26–33 115 60 (52.2) 55 (47.8) 0.7 (0.3–1.6)
 34–41 128 74 (57.8) 54 (42.2) 0.9 (0.4–2.0)
 42–49 103 47 (45.6) 56 (54.4) 0.5 (0.2–1.2)
 ≥50 34 20 (58.8) 14 (41.2) 1

Marital status
 Unmarried/single 115 64 (55.7) 51 (44.3) 0.5 (0.2–1.2)
 Married 211 122 (57.8) 89 (42.2) 0.5 (0.2–1.3)
 Divorced/separated 65 25 (38.5) 40 (61.5) 0.7 (0.3–1.9)
 Widowed 31 15 (48.4) 16 (51.6) 1

Education
 Illiterate 55 22 (40.0) 33 (60.0) 1.2 (0.5–2.8)
 No formal education but can read & write 55 39 (70.9) 16 (29.1) 4.7 (2.1–10.6)
 Grade 1-8 108 55 (50.9) 53 (49.1) 2.0 (1.0–3.9)
 Grade 9-12 151 92 (60.9) 59 (39.1) 3.0 (1.5–5.8)
 Above grade 12 53 18 (34.0) 35 (66.0) 1

Residence
 Abderafi 315 184 (58.4) 131 (31.6) 1
 Abrehajira 107 42 (39.2) 65 (60.8) 0.4 (0.2–0.7)

Occupation
 Unemployed 25 12 (48.0) 13 (52.0) 0.8 (0.3–2.2)
 Student 41 22 (53.6) 19 (46.4) 1.1 (0.4–2.5)
 Civil Servant 110 58 (52.7) 52 (47.3) 1.0 (0.5–2.0)
 House Wife 33 21 (63.6) 12 (36.4) 1.6 (0.6–4.0)
 Farmer 158 85 (53.8) 73 (46.2) 1.1 (0.6–2.0)
 Private Worker 55 28 (50.9) 27 (49.1) 1

3.4. Practice of participants

Table 7 shows the descriptive analysis of the practices. The study participants were asked about what they would do regarding VL infection; specifically, they were asked about their health care seeking practices, preventive actions and where they went for treatment. The survey indicated that most of the participants (62.3%) have a practice of seeking the health care service as soon as they got sick, avoiding sand fly bite (59.0%) to prevent VL infection and preferring government institutions (82.9%) for treatment.

Table 7.

Descriptive analysis on prevention practice of participants.

Variables Frequency Percent (%)
How often do you seek health care?
Less than once a year 34 8.1
Once a year 21 5.0
Twice a year 98 23.2
As soon as I get sick 263 62.3
Not at all 6 1.4
What do you do to prevent from getting VL infection?
Good hygiene 135 32.0
Good nutrition 141 33.4
Avoid from mosquito bites 137 32.5
Avoid from sand fly bites 249 59.0
Avoid sharing utensils 27 6.4
What do you do to prevent the spread of VL infection from patients?
Avoid sand fly bites 226 53.6
Avoid mosquito bites 195 46.2
Avoid sharing utensils 156 37.0
Avoid sharing needles and tooth brush 130 30.8
Avoid hand shaking 25 5.9
Where do you prefer to seek VL treatment?
Government health institutions 350 82.9
Private health institutions 57 13.5
Pharmacy 1 0.2
Traditional healers 0 0.0
Holly water 6 1.4

The cumulative frequency for a given variable may be equal or greater than the total sample size (422), since one participant may mention one or more than one preventive practices.

The overall practices of participants towards VL infection were also assessed (Table 8). Of all participants, only 14.9% had optimal practices. Bivariate analysis identified two variables (sex and residence) were significantly associated with overall practice.

Table 8.

Overall practice of the participants towards visceral leishmaniasis.

Variables Total number (n = 422) Optimal practice (%) Crude Odds Ratio (95%CI)
Sex
 Male 228 43 (18.9) 2.0 (1.1–3.5)
 Female 194 20 (10.3) 1

Age (years)
 18–25 42 9 (21.4) 2.8 (0.6–11.3)
 26–33 115 15 (13.0) 1.5 (0.4–5.7)
 34–41 128 17 (13.3) 1.5 (0.4–5.7)
 42–49 103 19 (18.4) 2.3 (0.6–8.4)
 ≥50 34 3 (8.8) 1

Marital status
 Unmarried/single 115 17 (14.8) 1
 Married 211 34 (16.1) 0.7 (0.4–1.4)
 Separated/divorced 65 8 (12.3) 0.4 (0.1–1.3)
 Widowed 31 4 (12.9) 0.1 (0.01–1.0)

Education
 Illiterate 55 20 (36.4) 7.0 (2.1–22.2)
 No formal education but can read & write 55 9 (16.4) 2.3 (0.6–8.3)
 Grade 1-8 108 18 (16.7) 2.4 (0.7–7.6)
 Grade 9-12 151 12 (7.9) 1.0 (0.3–3.4)
 Above grade 12 53 4 (7.5) 1

Residence
 Abderafi 315 33 (10.5) 1
 Abrehajira 107 30 (28.0) 3.3 (1.9–5.7)

Occupation
 Unemployed 25 6 (24.0) 1
 Student 41 9 (21.9) 0.8 (0.2–2.8)
 Civil servant 110 16 (14.5) 0.5 (0.1–1.5)
 House wife 33 2 (6.0) 0.2 (0.03–1.1)
 Farmer 158 23 (14.5) 0.5 (0.1–1.4)
 Private worker 55 7 (12.7) 0.4 (0.1–1.5)

4. Discussion

This research was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of the resident community towards VL in West Armachiho district, northwest Ethiopia. The results of the study indicate that VL was familiar to the community, as almost all of the study participants responded that they had heard about the disease, with various sources of information. Friends (80.8%), pamphlet (34.1%) and health care providers (33.2%) were the three most important source of information. In line with this finding, Yared et al. (2014) reported that friends (46.6%) and health personnel (45.6%) were major sources of information in Western Tigray, Ethiopia. Friends and neighbours as the main source of information were also reported by Mondal et al. (2009) and Siddiqui et al. (2010) in India, Nepal and Bangladesh.

Most participants (88.2%) recognized persistent enlargement of spleen or liver as symptoms of VL. Other reported symptoms were fever (48.3%), loss of weight (37.7%), loss of appetite (23.7%), abdominal pain (19.9%). These results were comparable with those from previous studies conducted in India (Siddiqui et al., 2010; Singh et al., 2006). About half of participants (52.1%) knew that the disease could be transmitted by sand fly. This indicated that more has to be done to increase the awareness of the community. This agreed with previous study which was conducted in India (Siddiqui et al., 2010).

Participants who lived in Abderafi were more knowledgeable (23.8%) than those residents who lived in Abrehajira (13.1%). This difference might be related to the health workers in Abderafi who might create suitable situations to upgrade the community knowledge. Considerable number of the participants (53.6%) suggested that avoiding sand fly bites was helpful to prevent VL infection. However, the result of this study disagreed with the result of previous studies conducted in India which showed that VL was thought to be a preventable disease by 95% of the participants (Rijal et al., 2006).

Most of the participants had a perception that all VL patients were not necessarily HIV/AIDS positive (69.9%) and they did not mind if others knew that they were infected with VL (70.1%). This could be the reason why more than half of the participants (60.4%) answered that if they were infected with VL they would tell to others. This would be important status for health education programs by making patients less prone to potential stigma. It was also supported by the result (61.1%) of the participants who said that they would not afraid VL patients because of their illness. Most of the participants perceived that VL could affect income generating activities, the marital relationship and the family responsibilities. A considerable proportion participant also perceived that VL could affect the relationship with friends and other community members.

The study participants had an appreciable health seeking behaviour as more than half of them (62.3%) sought medical care as soon as they felt sick and about quarter of them (23.2%) of them visited medical care settings twice a year. Only a small proportion (1.4%) of the participants did not seek medical care at all. Most (82.9%) of participants preferred government health institutions for VL treatment, and none of the participants visited traditional healers. Similarly, a previous study conducted in Sudan showed that 76.8% of participants preferred VL treatment centres (Hassan et al., 2012).

Nearly equal proportions of participants reported that good hygiene, good nutrition and avoiding mosquito were helpful to prevent VL. This agrees with the concern that malnutrition could increase the risk of developing VL symptoms (Alvar et al., 2006). Participants of this study suggested that avoiding sand fly bites (53.6%) and mosquito bites (46.2%) with bed nets, insecticide and repellents and avoiding sharing needles and tooth brush (30.8%), and avoiding sharing utensils (37.0%) might prevent the disease. A study conducted in India showed that there was statistically significant relationship between VL knowledge and practices to prevent VL (Singh et al., 2006).

Our study indicated that 21.1% of the study participants in Armachiho district were knowledgeable, 53.6% had positive attitudes and 14.9% had optimal practices on VL. The attitude of the participants was relatively better than both their knowledge and practices. Better attitude (95%) of the participants towards VL were also reported by Berhe et al. (2018) Welkait district, Ethiopia. On the other hand, the status of the knowledge and practice of the community of this study didn't agree with that of Berhe et al. (2018) in Welkait district, Ethiopia where 59% of the community were knowledgeable and 53% had optimal practices. The difference may be related to the demographic characteristics of participants in these two studies.

5. Conclusions

Inadequate knowledge and incorrect practices regarding VL were reported in this study. The control and prevention of VL in the district remains a subject of interest because the disease is threatening the health of the population. The success of the disease control and prevention program depends on improving the KAP of the resident community. The community should be encouraged to share the responsibility and participate actively in health education programs. More studies have to be conducted for better understanding of the dynamics of the disease in the area.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Habtamu Tamrat Melkamu: Performed the experiments; Wrote the paper.

Achenef Melaku Beyene: Conceived and designed the experiments; Wrote the paper.

Desalegn Tigabu Zegeye: Analyzed and interpreted the data.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our deep appreciation and thanks to the West Armachiho district administration officers for their support to get the information needed for this study. We are also grateful to the staff of West Armachiho district tourism office, agricultural office and the staff of Abderafi MSF that supports us during data collection. Our especial thank also goes to the study participants for their time and cooperation in providing the necessary information.

References

  1. Alemu A., Alemu A., Esmael N., Dessie Y., Hamdu K., Mathewos B., Birhan W. Knowledge, attitude and practices related to visceral leishmaniasis among residents in Addis Zemen town, South Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:382. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-salem W., Herricks J.R., Hotez P.J. A review of visceral leishmaniasis during the conflict in South Sudan and the consequences for East African countries. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9(460):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1743-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alemayehu M., Wubshet M., Mesfin N., Gebayehu A. Prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and associated factors among Visceral Leishmaniasis infected patients in Northwest Ethiopia: a facility based cross-sectional study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017;17(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2261-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvar J., Yactayo S., Bern C. Leishmaniasis and poverty. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(12):552–557. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Assefa A. Leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence in animals and humans. Heliyon. 2018;4 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00723. e00723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berhe M., Bsrat A., Taddele H., Gadissa E., Hagos Y., Tekle Y., Abera A. Knowledge attitude and practice towards visceral leishmaniasis among residents and health professionals in Welkait district, western Tigray. J. Trop. Dis. 2018;6(1):4–11. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chappuis F., Sundar S., Hailu A., Ghalib H., Rijal S., Peeling R., Alvar J., Boelaert M. Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007;5(11):873–882. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CSA . 2013. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Population Projection of Ethiopia for All Regions at Wereda Level from 2014 – 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gadisa E., Tsegaw T., Abera A., Elnaiem D., Den Boer M., Aseffa A., Jorge A. Eco-epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0987-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gomes Y.M., Paiva Cavalcanti M., Lira R.A., Abath F.G. Diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis : biotechnological advances. Vet. J. 2008;175:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hassan M., Banaga A., Frah A., Nour B. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice about sand fly and visceral leishmaniasis control activities in rural area of gedarif. Al Neelain Med. J. 2012;2(4):11–14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lemma W. Zoonotic leishmaniasis and control in Ethiopia. Asian Pacif. J. Trop. Med. 2018;11(5):313. [Google Scholar]
  13. Leta S., Dao T., Frehiwot M., Alemayehu G. Visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia : an evolving disease. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2014;8(86) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003131. e3131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lopez-Perea N., Luis Sordo L., Gadisa E., Cruz I., Hailu T., Moreno J., Aseffa A., Canavate C., Custodio E. Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to visceral leishmaniasis in rural communities of Amhara state: a longitudinal study in northwest Ethiopia. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2014;8(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mondal D., Singh S., Kumar N., Joshi A., Sundar S., Das P., Siddhivinayak H., Kroeger A., Boelaert M. Visceral leishmaniasis elimination programme in India , Bangladesh , and Nepal : reshaping the case finding/case management strategy. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2009;3(1):e355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mulat Y., Bayeh A., Wondemagegn M., Yohannes Z. Proportion of visceral leishmaniasis and human immune deficiency virus Co- infection among clinically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis patients at the endemic foci of the Amhara national regional state, north-west Ethiopia’. Am. J. Biomed. Life Sci. 2014;2(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Oryan A., Akbari M. Asian pacific journal of tropical medicine. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. Elsevier B.V. 2016;9(10):925–932. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rijal S., Koirala S., Van der Stuyft P., Boelaert M. The economic burden of visceral leishmaniasis for households in Nepal. Trans. Roy. Soc Trop. Med. and Hyg. 2006;100:838–841. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Siddiqui N.A., Kumar N., Ranjan A., Pandey K., Das V., Verma R., Das P. Awareness about kala-azar disease and related preventive attitudes and practices in a highly endemic rural area of India. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 2010;41(1):12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh S.P., Reddy D., Mishra R., Sundar S. Knowledge , attitude , and practices related to kala-azar in A rural area of Bihar state , India. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006;75(3):505–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thrusfield M. third ed. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2007. Veterinary Epidemiology; pp. 250–265. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wasunna M., Musa A., Hailu A., Khalil E., Olobo J., Juma R., Wells S., Alvar J., Balasegaram M. The Leishmaniasis East Africa Platform: strengthening clinical trial capacity in resource-limited countries to deliver new treatments for visceral leishmaniasis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016;110(6):321–323. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trw031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WHO . 2019. World health organization, leishmaniases.file:///C:/Users/tbeye/Documents/Publication/After%20review%20kalazar/Second%20round%20review/Leishmaniasis.html Available at: [Google Scholar]
  24. Yared S., Kebede D., Gebreselassie A., Lemma W., Akililu E., Kirstein D., Balkew M., Warburg A., Gebre-Michael T., Hailu H. Risk factors of visceral leishmaniasis : a case control study in north-western Ethiopia. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s13071-014-0470-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES