Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2019 Dec 2;10(2):839–848. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400942

Tripsazea, a Novel Trihybrid of Zea mays, Tripsacum dactyloides, and Zea perennis

Xu Yan *,†,‡,1, Mingjun Cheng *,§,1, Yingzheng Li *, Zizhou Wu *, Yang Li *, Xiaofeng Li *, Ruyu He *, Chunyan Yang *,**, Yanli Zhao *, Huaxiong Li *,††, Xiaodong Wen *, Ping Zhang *, Ebenezer Sam *, Tingzhao Rong *, Jianmei He *, Qilin Tang *,2
PMCID: PMC7003090  PMID: 31792004

Abstract

A trispecific hybrid, MTP (hereafter called tripsazea), was developed from intergeneric crosses involving tetraploid Zea mays (2n = 4x = 40, genome: MMMM), tetraploid Tripsacum dactyloides (2n = 4x = 72, TTTT), and tetraploid Z. perennis (2n = 4x = 40, PPPP). On crossing maize-Tripsacum (2n = 4x = 56, MMTT) with Z. perennis, 37 progenies with varying chromosome numbers (36-74) were obtained, and a special one (i.e., tripsazea) possessing 2n = 74 chromosomes was generated. Tripsazea is perennial and expresses phenotypic characteristics affected by its progenitor parent. Flow cytometry analysis of tripsazea and its parents showed that tripsazea underwent DNA sequence elimination during allohexaploidization. Of all the chromosomes in diakinesis I, 18.42% participated in heterogenetic pairing, including 16.43% between the M- and P-genomes, 1.59% between the M- and T-genomes, and 0.39% in T- and P-genome pairing. Tripsazea is male sterile and partly female fertile. In comparison with previously synthesized trihybrids containing maize, Tripsacum and teosinte, tripsazea has a higher chromosome number, higher seed setting rate, and vegetative propagation ability of stand and stem. However, few trihybrids possess these valuable traits at the same time. The potential of tripsazea is discussed with respect to the deployment of the genetic bridge for maize improvement and forage breeding.

Keywords: Zea mays, Tripsacum dactyloides, Zea perennis, trihybrid, maize improvement, forage breeding


In the tribe Maydeae (family Gramineae), maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) (2n = 2x = 20Zm, genome = MM) from the genus Zea is the most prominent and ubiquitous species due to its high grain yield, forage yield and nutritive value for human food and animal feed as well as its use as an industrial material (Shiferaw et al. 2011). However, domestication has deleted many characters due to only breeding for yield and quality, leading to a narrow genetic base of modern maize, which results in increased vulnerability to biotic and abiotic stresses. Fortunately, its wild relatives, viz., teosinte and Tripsacum dactyloides (2n = 4x = 72Td, TTTT), are crossable with maize and are considered rich sources of untouched genes for these traits. The use of teosinte and T. dactyloides in maize improvement has been extensively reviewed by Harlan and De Wet (1977), Warburton et al. (2017), and Mammadov et al. (2018). In general, once a genetic bridge is established by crossing maize with teosinte or T. dactyloides, introgression of resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses possessed by wild relatives through backcrossing the genetic bridge with maize is commonly used due to male infertility and female subfertility of the genetic bridge.

Maize can be crossed with all teosinte species, including Z. mays ssp. mexicana, Z. mays ssp. parviglumis, Z. luxurians, Z. diploperennis and Z. perennis, with conventional breeding methods, although the degree of success is species-dependent (Tang et al. 2005; Hufford et al. 2012; Warburton et al. 2017). The only tetraploid teosinte species is Z. perennis (2n = 4x = 40Zp, PPPP); the others are diploid species. The teosinte bridge (mazie × teosinte) has been proven to be feasible for widening the genetic diversity and conferring some resistance to adverse environments in the process of maize improvement (reviewed by Mammadov et al. 2018). Adding a teosinte (Z. parviglumis) rare allele (Upright Plant Architecture2, which was deleted during maize domestication) to maize could significantly increase maize planting density and yield by reducing the maize leaf angle (Tian et al. 2019). This suggests that maize improvement could benefit from the useful traits hidden in its wild relatives. However, it was quite difficult when maize was pollinated by T. dactyloides and was only effective in some crosses of maize × T. dactyloides when the embryo rescuing technique was utilized. Several types of Tripsacum bridges have been used to broaden the genetic diversity of maize. Mangelsdorf and Reeves (1931) obtained the first Tripsacum bridge (2n = 2x = 10Zm + 18Td, MT) from the intergeneric cross of diploid Z. mays × diploid T. dactyloides by hand crossing and embryo rescue. These authors and De Wet et al. (1970) developed the second type of Tripsacum bridge (2n = 3x = 10Zm + 36Td, MTT) from a cross of diploid Z. mays × tetraploid T. dactyloides. Kindiger et al. (1996a) and Molina et al. (2006) reported the development of the third type of Tripsacum bridge (2n = 4x = 20Zm + 36Td, MMTT) from a cross between tetraploid Z. mays and tetraploid T. dactyloides. Backcrossed derivatives of three types of Tripsacum bridges with maize are also Tripsacum bridges and the only pathway to improve maize by Tripsacum. Eubanks (1995) reported a controversial Tripsacum bridge (Bennetzen et al. 2001) generated from crossing T. dactyloides (2n = 36 or 2n = 72) with Z. diploperennis (2n = 20), displaying 20 somatic chromosomes, regular synapsis in pollen mother cells (PMCs), and high pollen fertility.

To date, most researchers have been mining valuable genes and alleles from teosinte or Tripsacum using the abovementioned genetic bridges. Attempts to develop a novel bridge parent that permits the movement of exotic genes from wild relatives into maize have been sluggish in the 21st century. Are there other ways to exploit these treasure troves for maize improvement? As Harlan and De Wet (1977) noted, “It is now apparent that the choice of the Tripsacum parent is critical and that events occurring in the early backcrossing generations largely determine the ultimate outcome.” Recently, Iqbal et al. (2019), from our laboratory, reported a promising bridge (MTP) in which the tetraploid Tripsacum and tetraploid perennial teosinte coexist under a maize background and confirmed the value of this bridge for improving maize diversity. This work is a successful attempt to open up a new pathway to broaden the maize germplasm. Moreover, MTP was also used as a seed parent for breeding perennial forage maize (Li et al. 2015).

Given the previous naming rule, tripsacoid was defined as the characters introgressed from Tripsacum into maize (Anderson and Erickson 1941; Stalker et al. 1977; Harlan and De Wet 1977). The newly synthesized allohexaploid (MTP) encompasses the genomes from the genera Tripsacum and Zea; thus, MTP will be subsequently referred to as tripsazea. Here, we depict its synthesis, morphological characteristics, and chromosomal and reproductive behavior to better exploit tripsazea.

Materials and Methods

Material synthesis

The parental materials used in this study were a maize-Tripsacum hybrid (2n = 4x = 20Zm + 36Td, genome = MMTT, accession No. H278) and a tetraploid Z. perennis (2n = 4x = 40Zp, PPPP, 9475) from CIMMYT. The maize-Tripsacum, obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), was kindly provided by Dr. Maolin Zhao in 2005, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China. Employment of the material was found in previous studies (Kindiger et al. 1996a and 1996b). Original diploid Z. mays and tetraploid T. dactyloides of maize-Tripsacum were not available. Fortunately, tetraploid T. dactyloides (2n = 4x = 72Td, TTTT, TZ07) and tetraploid maize (2n = 4x = 40Zm, MMMM, V182) were introduced by the USDA for species comparison. In 2005, the trispecific hybrids were generated by crossing the maize-Tripsacum hybrid with 9475 by shortening silks and repeated pollination by Prof. Qilin Tang. Subsequently, these trihybrids with different chromosomal numbers were successfully synthetized (see below). Chromosome counting of these trihybrids was performed using the method of Cheng et al. (2016). Of all the trihybrids, a unique hybrid (i.e., tripsazea) has perenniality, which offered us the opportunity to execute the following experiment.

Morphological characteristics

A field trial was established at Chongzhou Agricultural Research Station of Sichuan Agricultural University (30°33′N, 103°38′E, elevation 523 m), Sichuan, southwestern China. The average annual precipitation is 1012.4 mm, with an extremely high temperature of 37.7° in the summer and an extremely low temperature of -3° in the winter. On April 20, 2017, plantlets (tripsazea, TZ07 and 9475) for the planting were excavated from the mother stands established in 2016 at Chongzhou. The plantlets used consisted of a single shoot with three leaves and lateral roots. A wide distance of 1.0 m between plants and 1.5 m between rows was adopted. On the same day, V182 seedlings with three leaves were also transplanted at the same density for comparison. Qualitative traits were recorded, and metric traits were measured 10 times for each material.

Genome change

The nuclear DNA content was determined from fresh leaves by flow cytometry following Kaushal et al. (2010). The nuclei isolated from Z. mays (inbred line, B73) were used as an internal standard (4.85 pg 2C−1) (Gui et al. 2007) for the determination of the relative 2C DNA content of tripsazea and its three parents. Each material was analyzed three times with a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter).

Chromosome behavior

The root tips from tripsazea were pretreated in α-bromonaphthalene at room temperature for 3 h, fixed in 3:1 (v/v) ethanol/glacial acetic acid (Carnoy’s fixative) at -4° overnight, and transferred to 70% ethanol at -4° for storage. After placing the root tips in a mixture of 6% cellulase (R-10, Yakult) and 1% pectinase (Y-23, Yakult) for 3 h at 37°, the roots were washed in distilled water. We transferred the root tips to a clean slide and then dropped a drop of Carnoy’s fixative with a fine needle and immediately dried the slide over an alcohol flame. The dried spreads were observed by phase-contrast light microscopy to screen spreads with well-spread metaphase cells. The spreads screened were saved at -20° for mitotic profiling. The PMCs from tripsazea were collected, treated in Carnoy’s fixative overnight, and then transferred to 70% ethanol at -4° for meiotic profiling. The PMC chromosome preparation followed the method mentioned above.

Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) was used to distinguish the M (Z. mays), T (T. dactyloides) and P (Z. perennis) genomes in tripsazea. Total DNA was extracted from young leaves of tetraploid maize (V182) and Z. perennis (9475) through a modified 2× CTAB method (Fu et al. 2015). According to the manufacturer’s protocols, the V182 DNA and the 9475 DNA were labeled with DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Roche) and BIOTIN-Nick Translation Mix (Roche), respectively. After placing the slides selected in 50 ml RNase A solution (Solarbio, 0.1 μg/ml in 2× SSC) for 60 min at 37°, the slides were washed twice in 2× SSC for 5 min each at room temperature. Slides were denatured in 70% deionized formamide (FAD) at 70° for 2 min and were quenched in ice-cold (-20°) 70% ethanol followed by dehydration (90% and 100% ethanol for 5 min each at room temperature). The hybridization mixture contained 50% FAD, 10% dextransulfate, 2× SSC, 0.5% SDS, 10 μg salmon sperm DNA, and 18 ng/μl for each probe DNA. The mixture was incubated at 80° for 10 min and then cooled with ice for 10 min. Subsequently, 45 μl of the mixture was added to each slide and incubated at 37° in a container overnight. After hybridization, slides were washed in 20% FAD for 15 min, and stringent washing followed by 2× SSC and 0.1× SSC at 42° for 15 min each was performed. The slides were then washed in 0.1% TritonX-100 for 5 min and 1× PBS three times (5 min each) at room temperature. After drying at room temperature, each slide was incubated with 47.7 μl anti-digoxigenin-fluorescein mix (Roche) and CY-3 fluorescein (Sigma) for 1 h at 37° in the dark and was then washed with 1× PBS three times. Finally, the slides were counterstained with DAPI and observed with an Olympus fluorescence microscope (BX-61). Images were taken with a Media Cybernetics CCD 700 (Charge Coupled Device) and Image Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).

Reproductive behavior

Flowering dates of each material were observed under field conditions in Chongzhou. The percentage of stainable pollen grains was calculated to measure pollen fertility. To investigate the fertility of the female gametes, we also tried to stimulate embryo development in tripsazea by dusting its silk with pollen from cultivated maize (Mo17). The seed setting rate was expressed by the number of seeds set/florets pollinated with the pollen of Mo17. Several teosintes, i.e., Z. mexicana, Z. perennis, Z. nicaraguensis and Z. luxurians, were also used as pollen donors to determine whether tripsazea can produce seeds.

Data availability

All data generated during the study appear in the article.

Results

Crossing maize-Tripsacum and Z. perennis

We pollinated 121 female spikelets of H278 with pollen from 9475 and obtained 50 seeds forming 37 seedlings. There were 10 seeds with double embryos. Trihybrids presented diverse morphological characters. Trihybrids were significantly higher than tetraploid maize in terms of tiller number and lateral branch number and were wider than T. dactyloides and Z. perennis in terms of stem diameter and leaf width, and most traits were intermediate among three parents. The expected chromosome number of artificial trihybrids is 48 chromosomes, including 10Zm, 18Td and 20Zp. However, 18 trihybrids with chromosome numbers ranging from 36 to 74 were observed, and seven types of chromosome numbers were observed in the trihybrids (Figure 1). Their chromosome numbers were 36 (1 plant), 46 (2 plants), 50 (2 plants), 52 (8 plants), 54 (3 plants), 72 (1 plant) and 74 (1 plant). The percentage of stainable pollen of trihybrids ranged from 0 to 9.69%, which was significantly lower than that of the three parents. Because H278 was dead in nature, we could not duplicate the synthesis process. In addition to perennial material, we lost other trihybrids that are annual or weakly perennial. No more information was obtained for lost trihybrids. Therefore, we must turn our attention to the sole survivor. The survivor (tripsazea) has 74 chromosomes (Figure 1H). Theoretically, it is an allohexaploid with two chromosomes missing. Iqbal et al. (2019) affirmed that the chromosome composition of tripsazea is 2n = 6x = 20Zm + 34Td + 20Zp with two Tripsacum chromosomes missing based on McGISH with a Cent-C probe.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Seven types of chromosome numbers in trihybrids. The chromosome number in trihybrids included (A) 2n = 36, (B) 2n = 46, (C) 2n = 50, (D) 2n = 52, (E) 2n = 52, (F) 2n = 54, (G) 2n = 72, and (H) tripsazea, 2n = 74. Scale bars, 10 μm.

Morphological characteristics of tripsazea

The morphological characteristics of tripsazea with its three parental species are shown in Figure 2, and a comparison of some morphological traits is also shown in Table 1. Trispecific tripsazea is a tall and erect bunchgrass with a high tiller number that grows more prolifically than its three parents. At first glance, tripsazea looks more like Z. perennis than maize and Tripsacum. However, it is taller, with a longer leaf length, greater leaf width, wider stem diameter, and a lower tiller number than Z. perennis. Tripsazea exhibits the perennial characteristics of both parents, viz., T. dactyloides and Z. perennis. Tripsazea, such as Z. perennis, can be propagated through the stand and aboveground stem node. The silks are longer than those of Z. perennis and T. dactyloides and shorter than those of Z. mays. Similar to T. dactyloides, some styles of tripsazea have a bifurcated tip. Among the 4 materials tested, the kernels of tetraploid maize (V182) are naked and the largest in size. The kernels of T. dactyloides and Z. perennis, smaller than V182 in size, are enwrapped in a hard fruitcase consisting of the rachis and the outer glume. However, the kernels of tripsazea showed an intermediate type compared to the parents, with moderate size, and are partially enclosed by glumes. Tripsazea plants had senesced by December. Tripsazea seedlings that regenerate in autumn can undergo low temperature (>5°) and die after frost killing. Normally, five to ten ears are produced on a culm during a flowering period, and plants produce 150-200 ears twice annually. Every culm produces 5-7 branches, and the top and node branches grow the female spike; each ear has 8-18 ovules with opposite rows of paired seeds. Tripsazea possesses features of perennation and agamic propagation, making it a good genetic material for continuous research.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Morphology of tripsazea and comparison of its several morphological characters with three parental species. (A) One-year-old tripsazea plant by stem node propagation. (B) Tripsazea ears from axillary bud differentiation, branching of lateral inflorescence. (C) A tripsazea seedling from the axillary bud. (D) Regenerated tripsazea plants after mowing. (E) Flowering of tripsazea plants induced by short-day exposure. (F) Mature leaves from the hybrid and its parents (area 1 cm2). The ear (G), seed (H), male spikelet (I) and silk (J) from the hybrid (tripsazea: MTP) and its parental species (M, T, and P designations refer to Z. mays, T. dactyloides, and Z. perennis, respectively). Scale bars, 1 cm.

Table 1. Morphological characteristics of the tripsazea along with its parental species.

CHARACTER Z. mays T. dactyloides Z. perennis TRIPSAZEA
Life cycle Annual Perennial Perennial Perennial
Rhizome Absent Present Present Absent
Female spike enclosed in husks Enclosed Naked Enclosed Enclosed
Pedicelle on second male spikelet Pedicelled Sessile Pedicelled Pedicelled
Seeds enclosed in shell Naked Enclosed Enclosed Half-naked
Tiller number 0.30 ± 0.67d 49.10 ± 12.08a 38.90 ± 9.80b 12.60 ± 4.40c
Leaf width (cm) 5.87 ± 0.44a 1.81 ± 0.17d 2.67 ± 0.45c 4.50 ± 0.64b
Leaf Length (cm) 58.20 ± 7.36b 112.07 ± 25.98a 36.55 ± 8.20c 59.57 ± 10.87b
No. ears per stem 1.00 ± 0.00c 8.70 ± 2.36b 7.10 ± 1.66b 14.00 ± 5.19a
No. ovules per ear 141.40 ± 24.14a 10.00 ± 1.76b 6.20 ± 0.42b 15.30 ± 4.22b
No. branches per tassel 8.0 ± 1.83a Absent 2.5 ± 1.08c 4.4 ± 1.43b
Branching of lateral inflorescence Absent 3.30 ± 1.16b 4.90 ± 2.42a 6.20 ± 0.79a
Silk length (mm) 15.93 ± 2.35a 2.24 ± 0.32d 4.91 ± 1.08c 9.70 ± 1.95b
Height of main tiller (cm) 112.00 ± 8.63d 211.60 ± 33.26b 183.60 ± 12.08c 250.20 ± 22.20a
Stem diameter (mm) 16.24 ± 2.54a 10.45 ± 1.53b 12.07 ± 2.65b 16.77 ± 1.94a
No. row functional pistillate spikelets 8, 10, or 12 2 2 4

Data are mean ± SD. Different letters in a row mean significant difference between means at α = 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Genome changes in tripsazea

After the formation of polyploid, the genome size often shows two results: no change, or genomic fragments (or some genes) are lost. As expected, tripsazea showed the latter situation owing to the loss of two chromosomes from Tripsacum (Figure 3). The DNA content of the parent was 9.12 ± 0.44 pg 2C-1 in tetraploid Z. mays, 13.99 ± 0.07 pg 2C-1 in T. dactyloides, and 8.13 ± 0.14 pg 2C-1 in Z. perennis. The results showed that the DNA content could be utilized as a marker to distinguish the three parents. However, the genome size of tripsazea was 13.81 ± 0.39 pg 2C-1, which was significantly lower than the expected value (15.62 pg 2C-1), indicating genome downsizing during allohexaploidization among the three species.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

FCM histograms from leaves of tripsazea and its three parental species, using maize inbred line (B73) as an internal standard: (A) B73, (B) V182, (C) TZ07, (D) 9475, (E) tripsazea, and (F) comparison of the relative DNA content (data shown as mean and S.D., n = 3; different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant difference at the α = 0.05 level according to Duncan’s multiple range test).

Chromosome behavior of tripsazea

The mitotic observation of tripsazea showed that its chromosomes from three genomes did not exhibit irregular mitotic behavior (Figure 4A). There were no lagging chromosomes or chromosome bridges, indicating that the mitotic behavior of tripsazea was stable and was not affected by the addition of the external genome.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The mitotic (panel A) and meiotic behavior (panel B) of tripsazea. The prophase (a), metaphase (b), anaphase (c) and telophase (d) of mitosis. Diakinesis I (e, f, and g), metaphase I (h), anaphase I (i and j) and telophase (k) of meiosis and observed allosyndetic associations and their diagram (l). Yellow (or green), pink and blue signals were from the maize, Z. perennis and T. dactyloides genomes, respectively. Scale bars, 10 µm.

Meiotic analysis of tripsazea revealed the occurrence of 4.24I + 27.19II + 0.79III + 3.25IV at diakinesis I in average chromosome association per pollen mother cell (Table 2 and Figure 4B). On average, 73.49%, 17.57%, 5.73%, and 3.20% of the chromosomes in PMCs paired as bivalents, tetravalents, univalents and trivalents, respectively. Multivalence with a higher number was not observed. In our observations, we detected that 5.73%, 75.84% and 18.42% of the chromosomes participated in no, homologous and heterologous pairing, respectively. For heterozygosis, allosynapsis between the M- and P-genomes was dominant (16.43%). All multivalent (≤4) configurations involving the M-genome and P-genome were present, and the most frequent configuration was 1.53 IImp + 1.84 IVmmpp. Allosyndetic pairing between the M- and T-genomes was minor (1.59%), and the T- and P-genome pairing was the lowest (0.39%). Some multivalent configurations involving the T-genome were not observed, including IIItpp, IVmmmt, IVtppp, IVmttt, and IVtttp. These results suggested that the homology between Z. mays and Z. perennis was the highest, followed by Z. mays and T. dactyloides, and the homology between T. dactyloides and Z. perennis was the lowest. All of these allosynapses revealed that these chromosomes have partial homology. Although a few intergenomic multivalents (Figure 4l) were formed, introgression of specific target genes from T. dactyloides or Z. perennis into Z. mays and vice versa may be foreseeable.

Table 2. Cytological features of PMCs (n = 126) in tripsazea at diakinesis I.

CHROMOSOME ASSOCIATION NUMBER (PERCENTAGE) OF PMCS WITH CORRESPONDING VALENT MEIOTIC CONFIGURATION
AVERAGE MIN. MAX.
Univalent m 83 (65.87) 1.04 0 6
t 89 (70.63) 2.24 2 12
p 63 (50.00) 0.96 0 6
I 4.24
Bivalent mm 126 (100.0) 5.29 2 10
tt 126 (100.0) 14.55 9 17
pp 126 (100.0) 5.59 1 9
mt 24 (19.05) 0.19 0 1
mp 81 (64.29) 1.53 2 6
tp 5 (3.97) 0.04 0 1
II 27.19
Trivalent mmm 12 (9.52) 0.09 0 1
ttt 9 (7.14) 0.07 0 1
ppp 3 (2.38) 0.02 0 1
mmt 17 (13.49) 0.14 0 1
mtt 3 (2.38) 0.02 0 1
mmp 17 (13.49) 0.20 0 3
mpp 24 (19.05) 0.22 0 2
ttp 4 (3.17) 0.03 0 1
tpp
III 0.79
Tetravalent mmmm 32 (25.40) 0.27 0 2
tttt 20 (15.87) 0.53 0 4
pppp 40 (31.75) 0.38 0 2
mmmt
mmtt 11 (8.73) 0.08 0 1
mttt
mmmp 8 (6.35) 0.06 0 1
mmpp 117 (92.86) 1.84 0 5
mppp 8 (6.35) 0.06 0 1
tttp
ttpp 4 (3.17) 0.03 0 1
tppp
IV 3.25

Chromosome complements from respective species: m–Z. mays, t–T. dactyloides, p–Z. perennis; each alphabet denotes a univalent dose.

Chromosomal segregation of tripsazea in anaphase I was also observed (Figure 4i, j and k). The maximum chromosome number of Tripsacum was 18 in daughter cells, the minimum chromosome number was 12, and the average chromosome number was 15.7. The maximum daughter cell chromosome number of maize (Z. perennis) was 13 (13), and the minimum was 6 (6), with an average of 9.6 (9.5). The maximum number of Tripsacum lagging chromosomes was 8, the minimum was one with an average of 4.1, and all observed cells had Tripsacum lagging chromosomes. In Z. mays and Z. perennis, 50% of the cells tested showed lagging chromosomes. The average (range) of lagging chromosomes was 1.4 (1-3) in Z. mays and 1.4 (1-2) in Z. perennis. The results suggested that Tripsacum chromosomes might be more easily lost in gametogenesis compared with Z. mays and Z. perennis.

Reproductive behavior of tripsazea

Tripsazea was highly photoperiod sensitive and biannually flowered under short-day conditions (first in April-May and again in September-December). The immediate parent 9475 flowered annually during the months of October-December. The flowering period of T. dactyloides began in May and extended into October. Trihybrid tripsazea showed extremely low male fertility (0.16% stainable pollen). Despite the low temperature during the flowering period of tripsazea, it can produce mature seeds after open pollination conditions, indicating that the female ear has partial fertility. When Mo17 was used as a pollen parent, the seed setting rate of tripsazea was 3.16% under artificial pollination conditions. Seeds could be obtained with pollen from Z. perennis, Z. nicaraguensis, Z. mexicana and Z. luxurians, but the seed setting rate was not investigated.

Discussion

Previous trihybrids involving maize, Tripsacum and teosinte

Initially, a triple hybrid [(Z. mays × T. dactyloides) × Z. mexicana, 2n = 3x = 10Zm + 18Td + 10Ze] created by Mangelsdorf and Reeves (1935) was sterile and annual without stainable pollen and with an extremely low seed-setting rate (maize pollen 0.96% and Z. mexicana pollen 0%). Newell and De Wet (1973) obtained a series of triploid plants from the cross of Z. mays × T. dactyloides hybrids and Z. mexicana or Z. perennis. Walton Galinat developed a perennial trihybrid (2n = 3x = 10Zm + 18Td + 10Zd) by crossing a colchicine-doubled allodiploid [Z. mays (MM) × T. dactyloides (TT)] with Z. diploperennis (Lamb and Birchler 2006). A perennial genotype, i.e., tripsazea, was generated in our laboratory by pollinating a maize-Tripsacum hybrid (MMTT) with Z. perennis.

Morphologically, the phenotypic change of these trihybrids is similar to maize, including enhanced photoperiod sensitivity, increased number of tillers and branches caused by the gene teosinte branched1 (tb1), and transmutative ear architecture dominated by the gene teosinte glume architecture (tga1) (Hufford et al. 2012). Several hybridization pathways, i.e., n + n, 2n + n, 2n, and an irregular type, were reported in the formation of hybrids containing Tripsacum and maize (Newell and De Wet 1973). In the reported dihybrids of maize and Tripsacum, the range of chromosome numbers was 21-92 (maize chromosomes 6-50 and Tripsacum chromosomes 1-72) owing to the facultative apomixis of T. dactyloides in the maize-Tripsacum background (Harlan and De Wet 1977). Therefore, the synthesis of trihybrids with different chromosome numbers (36-74) in our cross was not surprising.

According to the genomic composition of tripsazea, we present three speculations for its formation. First, the maize-Tripsacum hybrid may have had 54 chromosomes in somatic cells. In this situation, tripsazea was a product of a 2n + n mating whereby an unreduced egg of tetraploid maize-Tripsacum was fertilized by a sperm nucleus of Z. perennis. Second, the maize-Tripsacum hybrid with 56 chromosomes produced a gamete with complete genomes of maize and incomplete genomes of Tripsacum. Third, tripsazea was generated by fertilization between a 2n female gamete from maize-Tripsacum with 56 chromosomes and an n male gamete from Z. perennis with subsequent 2 Td chromosomes elimination in early embryogenesis.

Chromosome pairing within genomes in hybrids involving maize, Tripsacum or Z. perennis

Numerous cytological findings have shown that maize (2n = 20) forms almost 10 bivalents at meiosis (Poggio et al. 2000; Iqbal et al. 2018). When diploid and tetraploid maize was pollinated with Z. perennis, in the P-genome from dihybrids, the proportion of chromosomes participating in heterologous pairing was 49.75% for an allotriploid (10Zm + 20Zp) and 47.70% for an allotetraploid (20Zm + 20Zp) (Iqbal et al. 2018). However, intergenomic pairing in maize-Tripsacum dihybrids is always rare (De Wet and Harlan 1974) and dependent on the genetic background (Harlan et al. 1970). For example, the basic genomes of maize (x = 10) and T. dactyloides (x = 18) have little genomic affinity for each other in hybrids (10Zm + 18Td), and one (or at most two) Zm chromosome can occasionally form loose bivalents with Td chromosomes during meiosis (De Wet and Harlan 1974). In most hybrids (10Zm and 36Td), Td chromosomes associate into 18 bivalents; in a few hybrids, 1-4 Zm chromosomes occasionally associate with Td chromosomes to form bivalents and trivalents (De Wet and Harlan 1974). These hybrids (20Zm and 36Td) usually present 18 Tripsacum bivalents; hybrids with 10Zm + 72Td show 36 Tripsacum bivalents, and 8 Zm chromosomes have pairing affinities with Td chromosomes in rare cases (De Wet and Harlan 1974).

When the chromosomes of Z. perennis were inserted into the maize-Tripsacum dihybrid, trihybrid tripsazea formed more allosyndetic associations than maize-Tripsacum and less allosyndetic associations than maize-Z. perennis during meiosis. The percentage of allosyndetic-association chromosomes was 18.42% for tripsazea, 51.17% for an allotriploid (10Zm + 20Zp) (Iqbal et al. 2018), 47.70% for an allotetraploid (20Zm + 20Zp) (Iqbal et al. 2018), and almost zero for maize-Tripsacum (20Zm + 36Td) (De Wet and Harlan 1974). Among allosyndetic pairings in tripsazea, pairings between the Zm and Zp chromosomes were the highest (16.43%), followed by Zm and Td chromosomes (1.59%), with the lowest pairings (0.39%) for Zp and Td chromosomes. When the valents with Td (Zp) were excluded from tripsazea, the percentage of allosyndetic-association chromosomes was 30.40% (2.19%). In the P-genome (T-genome) from tripsazea, the percentage of chromosome participating in heterologous pairing was 31.11% (1.70%). These results, together with previous research (De Wet and Harlan 1974; Molina et al. 2006; Iqbal et al. 2018), revealed that a) T. dactyloides is more closely related to Z. mays than Z. perennis, b) three genomes sharing one nucleus led to a reduction in heterologous pairings in comparison with an intrageneric dihybrid, and c) intergenomic pairing seemed to be higher but still rare in the trihybrid in comparison with its intergeneric dihybrid parent.

Tapping the maize secondary genepool via tripsazea

To our knowledge, previously synthetic trihybrids aimed at understanding the evolutionary relationship among the three species and were seldom applied to maize improvement. Prior breeding efforts for transferring valuable genes lost during domestication into cultivated maize were focused on digenomic hybrids derived from maize × teosinte hybrids and maize × Tripsacum hybrids. Although T. dactyloides has a more diverse genetic variation than teosinte, its gene pool has not been sufficiently tapped. First, an efficient Tripsacum bridge is a prerequisite for mining Tripsacum genetic resources. However, it is not easy to synthesize Tripsacum bridges by traditional crossing, even when combined with the embryo rescue technique. In a recent study, a total of 94,643 seeds from 54 eastern gamagrass populations exposed in proximity to glyphosate-tolerant maize fields were evaluated by a glyphosate-tolerant test and transgene marker (Lee et al. 2017). Their results indicated that natural hybridization between Tripsacum and maize is impossible. Of the formerly synthesized bridges, many are ephemeral, making them difficult to conserve and produce a large number of seeds of first backcrossed progeny. Meanwhile, the process of introducing genetic diversity from Tripsacum into maize and the exclusion of linkage drag genes require a large amount of time, manpower and material resources. Despite these difficulties, given the GM debate and ineffectiveness of GM technology for some traits (such as drought tolerance, see Gilbert 2014), this approach may be our best current strategy for introducing some alien genes into maize.

According to a review by Harlan and De Wet (1977), allodiploid (MT) is regarded as a hopeless crossing bridge for introgressing tripsacoid characters from Tripsacum into maize; allotriploid (MTT) usually results in recovered maize without or with little Tripsacum chromatin. Does a trihybrid incorporating the genetic resources of the three species have the potential to advance maize breeding? First, it may introduce the excellent traits of Z. perennis and T. dactyloides into maize. Second, it may promote or retard the introgression of Tripsacum genes into maize or favor the introgression of Z. perennis into maize because much higher homologous pairing was found between maize and tetraploid teosinte than between maize and Tripsacum. A high heterozygosity of tripsazea may provide a valuable bridge for chromosomal translocation to occur. Third, utilization of an allopolyploid as a bridge in maize backcrosses to produce epigenetic variation may also offer an opportunity for genetic improvement of maize.

By backcrossing tripsazea with Mo17 (Iqbal et al. 2019), progenies with different chromosome numbers emerged with three types of chromosomal cross-talk, including Zm-Zp (91.51% of all translocations), Zm-Td (4.72%), and Zp-Td (3.77%). Among the analyzed descendants, an additional maize-Tripsacum (2n = 20Zm + 1Td) line was obtained. In mating behavior, diversity of reproductive modes in tripsazea was found, including 2n, 2n + n, n + n and an irregular type. With respect to morphological characteristics, plant phenotypes of the backcrossed generation were diverse in terms of tiller number, lateral branch number, stem diameter, plant height, and ear traits. Therefore, tripsazea could serve as a conduit for gene flow from T. dactyloides and/or Z. perennis into maize.

Breeding perennial forage crops by tripsazea

Perennial forage maize has good forage quality, palatability and perenniality, making it a useful forage crop. Perennial teosintes, viz., Z. perennis and Z. diploperennis, are the basic versions of perennial forage maize. Initial success in breeding perennial forage maize was a single-cross hybrid of the Z. mays-Z. perennis substitution line (2n = 20) and Z. perennis, combining the tolerance to abiotic stresses and perenniality obtained from the Z. perennis parent with the rapid growth from the maize parent (Ren et al. 2007). Here, we have reason to expect another success via tripsazea. We integrated Z. perennis into maize-Tripsacum to improve the biomass of tripsazea. Tripsazea is an immortal genotype that combines perenniality and winterhardiness obtained from T. dactyloides and Z. perennis. Due to its high pollen sterility and low seed setting rate, it is impossible to develop perennial forage maize through seed. However, tripsazea and perennial teosintes (Z. diploperennis and Z. perennis), possessing vegetative propagation ability, allow us to breed agronomically superior clonal varieties with higher biomass and stress resistance by using tripsazea as a female parent in crosses with perennial teosintes.

As expected, a vigorous perennial clone (Figure 5A), ‘Yuqilin 58’ (now known as ‘Yucao No. 5′, Yu5), was successfully obtained (Li et al. 2015). These authors reported that this clone was synthetized by crossing tripsazea with Z. perennis by an n + n mating and that Yu5 possesses 58 chromosomes (Figure 5B), with an aneuploidy representing 11, 17 and 28 chromosomes from Z. mays, T. dactyloides, Z. perennis, and 2 Zm-Zp translocation chromosomes, respectively. The vegetative propagation of Yu5 by ramets and stems has been shown by Li et al. (2015): over 2 years of their trial in Chengdu, China, Yu5 at a 1.0 m × 1.0 m spacing achieved 22.08 and 14.39 Mg ha-1 of dry matter yield in the first year and second year, respectively. In 2019, Yu5 was approved as a forage variety by the National Grass Variety Approval Committee.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Field-grown perennial forage maize cv. Yu5 (A and B) and its chromosomal constitution (C) (Li et al. 2015). Blue, gray blue, green, and red colors represent T. dactyloides, Z. perennis, Z. mays chromosomes and Cent-C probes, respectively. Arrows indicate translocation chromosomes between Z. mays and Z. perennis. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Tripsazea as a model for allopolyploid study

In addition to the promising breeding application mentioned above, tripsazea has specific academic significance in polyploid research. Tripsazea and its perennial parents are asexual clones, and the tetraploid maize parent is conserved by seed, allowing us to continuously excavate information on the incipient stage after the formation of the allopolyploid. We confirmed the chromosome and DNA sequence elimination of polyploidization. Undoubtedly, tripsazea will provide an intergeneric material to reveal cross-genus regulation for gene and epigenetic expression patterns of allopolyploids to investigate the postpolyploid genomic evolution and to examine duplicate gene fate, among other applications. These studies will bring new insights into allopolyploid evolution and its relationship with maize domestication and improvement.

Conclusions

In this study, we used a synthetic allotetraploid (from the cross between tetraploid Z. mays and tetraploid T. dactyloides) as the seed parent in a cross with Z. perennis to generate trihybrids with different chromosome numbers. Of these hybrids, a superior genetic resource (tripsazea), which has two sets of genomes from each parent species, was produced. Many genetic bridges used in previous studies are ephemeral and were used once. Tripsazea is perennial and is maintained by propagules, making it easy for reuse. Tripsazea can be readily crossed with maize and produce partially fertile hybrids. Through the trigenomic bridge as a female parent, maize breeders may access almost all the genetic resources in the wild relatives for genetic improvement of maize and the development of new perennial forage crops. In conclusion, we offer a potential material and pathway to circumvent the Tripsacum-maize crossing barrier and to introduce alien genes from T. dactyloides and/or Z. perennis into maize.

Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply grateful for the availability of the maize-Tripsacum hybrid. The authors thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions to improve our manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program No. 2014CB138705), the Forage Breeding Projects of Sichuan Province during the 13th Five-Year Plan Period (No. 2016NZ0098-1103), the Major Science and Technology Projects of Sichuan Province (No. 2018NZDX0001), and the Projects of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (No. 2018JY0220).

Footnotes

Communicating editor: J. Birchler

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson E., and Erickson R. O., 1941.  Antithetical dominance in North American maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 27: 436–440. 10.1073/pnas.27.9.436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennetzen J. L., Buckler E. , Chandler V. , Doebley J., Dorweiler J. et al. , 2001.  Genetic evidence and the origin of maize. Lat. Am. Antiq. 12: 84–86. 10.2307/971759 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng M., Zheng M., Yang S., Li Y., Dong X. et al. , 2016.  The effect of different genome and cytoplasm on meiotic pairing in maize newly synthetic polyploids. Euphytica 207: 593–603. 10.1007/s10681-015-1552-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Wet J. M. J., and Harlan J. R., 1974.  Tripsacum-maize interaction: A novel cytogenetic system. Genetics 78: 493–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Wet J. M. J., Lambert R. J., Harlan J. R., and Naik S. M., 1970.  Stable triploid hybrids among Zea-Tripsacum-Zea back-cross populations. Caryologia 23: 183–187. [Google Scholar]
  6. Eubanks M., 1995.  A cross between two maize relatives: Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea diploperennis (Poaceae). Econ. Bot. 49: 172–182. 10.1007/BF02862921 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu J., Yang X.-Y., Cheng M.-J., Lü G.-H., Wang P. et al. , 2015.  Perennial aneuploidy as a potential material for gene introgression between maize and Zea perennis. J. Integr. Agric. 14: 839–846. 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60874-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilbert N., 2014.  Cross-bred crops get fit faster. Nature 513: 292 10.1038/513292a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gui Y. J., Wang S., Quan L. Y., Zhou C. P., Long S. B. et al. , 2007.  Genome size and sequence composition of moso bamboo: a comparative study. Sci. China Ser. C 50: 700–705. 10.1007/s11427-007-0081-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harlan J. R., and De Wet J. M. J., 1977.  Pathways of genetic transfer from Tripsacum to Zea mays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 3494–3497. 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harlan J. R., De Wet J. M. J., Naik S. M., and Lambert R. J., 1970.  Chromosome pairing within genomes in maize-Tripsacum hybrids. Science 167: 1247–1248. 10.1126/science.167.3922.1247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hufford M. B., Bilinski P., Pyhäjärvi T., and Ross-Ibarra J., 2012.  Teosinte as a model system for population and ecological genomics. Trends Genet. 28: 606–615. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iqbal M. Z., Cheng M., Su Y., Li Y., Jiang W. et al. , 2019.  Allopolyploidization facilitates gene flow and speciation among corn, Zea perennis and Tripsacum dactyloides. Planta 249: 1949–1962. 10.1007/s00425-019-03136-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iqbal M. Z., Cheng M., Zhao Y., Wen X., Zhang P. et al. , 2018.  Mysterious meiotic behavior of autopolyploid and allopolyploid maize. Comp. Cytogenet. 12: 247–265. 10.3897/CompCytogen.v12i2.24907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaushal P., Khare A., Siddiqui S. A., Agrawal A., Paul S. et al. , 2010.  Morphological, cytological and reproductive characterization of tri-species hybrids (GOS) between Pennisetum glaucum, P. orientale and P. squamulatum. Euphytica 174: 261–281. 10.1007/s10681-010-0152-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kindiger B., Sokolov V., and Dewald C., 1996a A comparison of apomictic reproduction in eastern gamagrass (Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L.) and maize-Tripsacum hybrids. Genetica 97: 103–110. 10.1007/BF00132586 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kindiger B., Sokolov V., and Khatypova I. V., 1996b Evaluation of apomictic reproduction in a set of 39 chromosome maize-Tripsacum backcross hybrids. Crop Sci. 36: 1108–1113. 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050006x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lamb J. C., and Birchler J. A., 2006.  Retroelement genome painting: cytological visualization of retroelement expansions in the genera Zea and Tripsacum. Genetics 173: 1007–1021. 10.1534/genetics.105.053165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee M.-S., Anderson E. K., Stojšin D., McPherson M. A., Baltazar B. et al. , 2017.  Assessment of the potential for gene flow from transgenic maize (Zea mays L.) to eastern gamagrass (Tripsacum dactyloides L.). Transgenic Res. 26: 501–514. 10.1007/s11248-017-0020-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li H. X., Cheng M. J., Su Y. G., Li Z. L., Jiang W. M. et al. , 2015.  Chromosomal composition and forage production potential of Yuqilin 58. Cao Ye Xue Bao 24: 157–163. 10.11686/cyxb20150419 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mammadov J., Buyyarapu R., Guttikonda S. K., Parliament K., Abdurakhmonov I. Y. et al. , 2018.  Wild relatives of maize, rice, cotton, and soybean: Treasure troves for tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 9: 886 10.3389/fpls.2018.00886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mangelsdorf P. C., and Reeves R. G., 1931.  Hybridization of maize, Tripsacum, and Euchlaena. J. Hered. 22: 329–343. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103399 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mangelsdorf P. C., and Reeves R. G., 1935.  A trigeneric hybrid of Zea, Tripsacum and Euchlaena. J. Hered. 26: 129–140. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Molina M. D. C., García M. D., and Chorzempa S. E., 2006.  Meiotic study of Zea mays ssp. mays (2n = 40) × Tripsacum dactyloides (2n = 72) hybrid and its progeny. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 9: 276–280. 10.2225/vol9-issue3-fulltext-25 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Newell C. A., and De Wet J. M. J., 1973.  A cytological survey of Zea-Tripsacum hybrids. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 15: 763–778. 10.1139/g73-090 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Poggio L., Confalonieri V., Comas C., Gonzalez G., and Naranjo C. A., 2000.  Evolutionary relationships in the genus Zea: Analysis of repetitive sequences used as cytological FISH and GISH markers. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23: 1021–1027. 10.1590/S1415-47572000000400048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ren Y., Chen R. Y., Tang Q. L., and Rong T. Z., 2007.  Growth dynamics and optimum harvest period of a novel forage maize. Zuo Wu Xue Bao 3: 1360–1365. http://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2007/V33/I08/1360 [Google Scholar]
  28. Shiferaw B., Prasanna B. M., Hellin J., and Bänziger M., 2011.  Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Secur. 3: 307–327. 10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stalker H. T., Harlan J. R., and De Wet J. M. J., 1977.  Cytology and morphology of maize-Tripsacum introgression. Crop Sci. 17: 745–748. 10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700050017x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tang Q., Rong T., Song Y., Yang J., Pan G. et al. , 2005.  Introgression of perennial teosinte genome into maize and identification of genomic in situ hybridization and microsatellite markers. Crop Sci. 45: 717–721. 10.2135/cropsci2005.0717 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tian J., Wang C., Xia J., Wu L., Xu G. et al. , 2019.  Teosinte ligule allele narrows plant architecture and enhances high-density maize yields. Science 365: 658–664. 10.1126/science.aax5482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Warburton M. L., Rauf S., Marek L., Hussain M., Ogunola O. et al. , 2017.  The use of crop wild relatives in maize and sunflower breeding. Crop Sci. 57: 1227–1240. 10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0855 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated during the study appear in the article.


Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES