Skip to main content
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2010 May 31;19(Suppl 1):61–87. doi: 10.1002/mpr.312

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health Mental Health Surveillance Study: calibration analysis

Jeremy Aldworth 1, Lisa J Colpe 2,, Joseph C Gfroerer 2, Scott P Novak 1, James R Chromy 1, Peggy R Barker 2, Kortnee Barnett‐Walker 1, Rhonda S Karg 1, Katherine B Morton 1, Katherine Spagnola 1
PMCID: PMC7003703  PMID: 20527006

Abstract

The Mental Health Surveillance Study (MHSS) is an ongoing initiative by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to develop and implement methods for measuring the prevalence of serious mental illness (SMI) among adults in the USA. The 2008 MHSS used data from clinical interviews administered to a sub‐sample of respondents to calibrate mental health screening scale data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) for estimating the prevalence of SMI in the full NSDUH sample. The mental health scales included the K6 screening scale of psychological distress (administered to all respondents) along with two measures of functional impairment (each administered to a random half‐sample of respondents): the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV (SCID) was administered to a sub‐sample of 1506 adult NSDUH respondents within 4 weeks of completing the NSDUH interview. Results indicate that while SMI prediction accuracy of the K6 is improved by adding either the WHODAS or the SDS to the prediction equation, the models with the WHODAS are more robust. The results of the calibration study and methods used to derive prevalence estimates of SMI are presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: calibration, Mental Health Surveillance Study, serious mental illness

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (322.1 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. Aldworth J., Barnett‐Walker K., Chromy J., Karg R., Morton K., Novak S.P. (2008). Measuring serious mental illness with the NSDUH: Results of the 2008 6‐month analysis. Prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, under Contract No. 283‐2004‐00022, Mental Health Surveillance Survey Deliverable No. 3.1, RTI/0209009.423.006.008, Research Triangle Institute International.
  2. First M.B., Spitzer R.L., Gibbon M., Williams J.B.W. (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV‐TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non‐patient Edition. (SCID‐I/NP), New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kessler R.C., Barker P.R., Colpe L.J., Epstein J.F., Gfroerer J.C., Hiripi E., Howes M.J., Normand S.L., Manderscheid R.W., Walters E.E., Zaslavsky A.M. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 60, 184–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leon A.C., Olfson M., Portera L., Farber L., Sheehan D.V. (1997). Assessing psychiatric impairment in primary care with the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int J Psychiatr Med, 27, 93–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Novak S.P., Colpe L.J., Barker P.G., Gfroerer J.C. (2010). Development of a brief mental health impairment scale using a nationally representative sample in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 19(Suppl. 1), 49–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rehm J., Ustun T.B., Saxena S., Nelson C.B., Chatterji S., Ivis F., Adlaf E. (1999). On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 8, 110–123, DOI: 10.1002/mpr.61 [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES