Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228463

Induction of systemic immunity through nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) of mice intranasally immunized with Brucella abortus malate dehydrogenase-loaded chitosan nanoparticles

Soojin Shim 1, Sang Hee Soh 1, Young Bin Im 1, Choonghyun Ahn 2, Hong-Tae Park 1, Hyun-Eui Park 1, Woo Bin Park 1, Suji Kim 1, Han Sang Yoo 1,3,*
Editor: Yung-Fu Chang4
PMCID: PMC7004331  PMID: 32027689

Abstract

Infection with Brucella abortus causes contagious zoonosis, brucellosis, and leads to abortion in animals and chronic illness in humans. Chitosan nanoparticles (CNs), biocompatible and nontoxic polymers, acts as a mucosal adjuvant. In our previous study, B. abortus malate dehydrogenase (Mdh) was loaded in CNs, and it induced high production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in THP-1 cells and systemic IgA in BALB/C mice. In this study, the time-series gene expression analysis of nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) was performed to identify the mechanism by which Mdh affect the target site of nasal immunization. We showed that intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh reduced cell viability of epithelial cells and muscle cells at first 1 h, then induced cellular movement of immune cells such as granulocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes at 6h, and activated IL-6 signaling pathway at 12h within NALT. These activation of immune cells also promoted signaling pathway for high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), followed by the maturation of DCs required for mucosal immunity. The CNs also triggered the response to other organism and inflammatory response, showing it is immune-enhancing adjuvant. The ELISA showed that significant production of specific IgA was detected in the fecal excretions and genital secretions from the CNs-Mdh-immunized group after 2 weeks-post immunization. Collectively, these results suggest that B. abortus Mdh-loaded CNs triggers activation of HMGB1, IL-6 and DCs maturation signaling within NALT and induce production of systemic IgG and IgA.

1. Introduction

Brucellosis is a highly contagious zoonotic disease caused by the genus Brucella, which is a group of gram-negative and facultative intracellular bacteria [1]. At present, live attenuated strains of Brucella abortus, such as Rev. 1, S19 and RB51, have been widely used for bovine brucellosis vaccine [2]. However, these vaccines have some drawbacks, including antibiotic resistance, interference with diagnosis, abortion in pregnant animals and pathogenicity in humans [2]. Over the years, many efforts have been made to find safe and effective antigens including recombinant protein [1, 2].

Recent studies have reported that malate dehydrogenase (Mdh), a key enzyme in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, is an important antigen in B. abortus infection of elk and cattle [3], and vaccination with Mdh promotes clearance of B. abortus infection in a mice model [4]. Additionally, Mdh was shown to be the most effective candidate for inducing pro-inflammatory immune responses in human leukemic monocyte cells (THP-1 cells) that were stimulated by several B. abortus recombinant proteins [5]. Similar to many pathogens, Brucella infections are usually transmitted through the mucosal membrane via oral or aerosol exposure [2, 6]. Therefore, the induction of mucosal immunity is important to build a primary barrier and prevent brucellosis. The induction of mucosal immunity in local site is able to stimulate both humoral and cell-mediated responses in mucosal and systemic sites [7].

To provoke mucosal immunity, an effective adjuvant and route of administration must be considered since the recombinant protein tends to be less immunogenic than the whole cell vaccine [8, 9]. Among the many adjuvants, chitosan nanoparticles (CNs) which are biocompatible and nontoxic have been shown to effective delivery vesicles to induce mucosal immunity [10, 11]. The chitosan, a natural linear polyaminosaccharide, is obtained by alkaline deacetylation of chitin and its positive charge by abundant amino groups reacts with negatively charged mucosal surfaces, as a useful polymer for mucosal delivery [10].

The inductive site of the mucosal immune response against inhaled antigen is known as the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) in the upper respiratory tract (URT) [12]. The NALT is often compared to Waldeyer's ring of humans and has been considered as functionally equivalent to Peyer’s patches in the gut [13]. NALT contains immunocompetent cell that play key roles in the defense against pathogens in upper respiratory tract and can induce various T helper cell subsets, including Th1, Th2 and Th17, in NALT [7, 13]. However, a transcriptomic regulation of nasal mucosa, the target site of nasal immunization, by intranasal immunization still remain unknown. In addition, it is not clear what characteristics of antigen can induce systemic immunity since systemic mucosal and humoral response is not always induced through mucosal immunization. Therefore, understanding of immune response in the NALT and following production of systemic antibody is crucial to facilitate the development of nasal vaccines.

Previously, our group loaded Mdh into the CNs and showed that Mdh is a promising antigen that elicits antigen-specific mucosal immune responses in BALB/c mice [14]. We assumed that appropriate activation of immune response of nasal cavity by composition of Mdh and CNs induced systemic immunity. Therefore, in the present study, the transcriptional responses of NALT were analyzed to identify the mechanism by which Mdh affect the target site of nasal immunization. The transcriptomic regulation within NALT was evaluated by identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of NALT from mice intranasally immunized with CNs-Mdh. In addition to the transcriptomic analysis, induction of mucosal and systemic humoral immunity was investigated after 2 weeks-post immunization. The study will be beneficial for further understanding of the immune responses against Mdh, initiative biological process of NALT following intranasal immunization and the rational design of vaccination strategies.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Preparation of Mdh

The Mdh was prepared according to a previously described method [14]. Briefly, E. coli strain harboring a recombinant plasmid constructed in a previous study [15] was grown overnight at 37° C in LB medium (Duchefa, Netherlands) and protein expression was induced by adding isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, Amresco, USA) at a final concentration of 0.3 mM. Then, the soluble protein fraction was purified using a His SpinTrap (GE Healthcare, UK) column according to the manufacturer's instructions after the pellet was sonicated at 10,000 Hz on ice. The proteins were constructed with a pCold vector containing a chaperone trigger factor (TF) to produce soluble and functional proteins. Therefore, as a vector control, TF was also purified using the above method. The endotoxin content of proteins was confirmed with a Pierce Chromogenic Endotoxin Quant kit (ThermoFisher, USA). The purity of proteins was confirmed using SDS-PAGE and Western blotting as previously described [15]. The concentration of purified proteins was measured by Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −20°C until use.

2.2. Preparation of CNs-Mdh

To prepare CNs, an ionic gelation method was used according to a previously developed method [10, 14]. Briefly, 0.125 g of water-soluble chitosan (Jakwang. Ansung, Korea) was dissolved in 25 ml of distilled water (0.5 w/v%) and mixed with 150 μl of 8% Tween 80 (Sigma, USA) solution. A total of 250 μl of TPP (10 w/v%) was dropped into 25 ml of 0.5 wt% chitosan solution through syringe under magnetic stirring and sonicated on ice (6 W, 10 min). The CNs were obtained by centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 rpm and freeze-dried.

To load Mdh and TF into the CNs, one milliliter of protein (3 mg/ml) containing 20 mg of CNs was kept at 37°C for 24 h in a shaking incubator. The supernatants containing free protein were removed by centrifugation (10 min, 8,000 rpm), and protein-loaded CNs were then freeze-dried. After loading antigens, the morphology of the particles was assessed using field emission SEM (FESEM, SUPRA 55VP; Carl Zeiss, Germany). The samples were placed on a cupper grid and air-dried at RT. Then, the samples were coated with platinum prior to examination by FESEM. The particle size was measured by DLS using a zeta potential and particle size analyzer (ELS Z-1000; Otsuka Electronics, Japan). The loading efficiency (LE) in the CNs was determined by calculating the free protein using a BCA protein assay (Pierce, USA) and the following equation:

LE(%)=TotalamountoftheproteinFreeproteinTotalamountoftheprotein×100

2.3. Ethics statement

The 6-week-old BALB/c female mice were purchased from Orient Bio (Orient Bio Inc., Seongnam, Korea). The study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Seoul National University (IACUC approval number: SNU-180403-7) according to the principles established by the Animal Protection Act and the Laboratory Animal Act in Republic of Korea. All animal surgeries were performed with highly minimized pain and suffering.

2.4. Nasal immunization and isolation of NALT

Each mouse was immunized by nasal route with 30 μg of purified TF and B. abortus Mdh with CNs in 20 μl of PBS, CNs alone or PBS. After 1 h, 6 h, and 12 h of immunization, NALT was obtained from the immunized mice (n = 3) as described previously [16]. Briefly, mice were sacrificed by ether asphyxia and the lower jaws were removed. Then, the palates were cut and removed. The paired NALT structures from each side of the septum were gently removed with fine dissection forceps.

2.5. RNA-seq analysis

Samples of NALT from CNs-Mdh immunized mice at 1 h, 6 h, and 12 h were chosen for RNA-sequencing analysis. As controls, in parallel time series, samples from the PBS-, CNs-, CNs-TF-immunized groups were also prepared. Total RNA was then extracted from the tissue using a RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). Subsequent RNA preparation steps were carried out at the TheragenEtex Bio Institute (Seoul, Korea). The purity and integrity of RNA were determined by denaturing gel electrophoresis, OD260/OD280 ratio, and analysis with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). The samples were then used to generate sequencing libraries with a TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, CA, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencer following the manufacturer’s instructions. Low-quality reads were filtered, and the reads were mapped to the reference genome related to the species using the TopHat aligner [17]. The gene expression level was measured with Cufflinks v2.1.1 [18] using the gene annotation database of the species. To improve the accuracy of the measurement, multi-read-correction and frag-bias-correction options were applied. All other options were set to default values.

2.6. Transcriptomic data analysis

The RNA-seq gene lists of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) obtained at each time point and differences were considered significant if p ≤ 0.05 and a fold-change > |2| were obtained. The fold change of "± inf" (infinity) means that expression was only detected in one immunized group and it was considered significant if p ≤ 0.05. Gene-enrichment and functional annotation analysis for significant probes was performed using Gene Ontology (http://geneontology.org) and PANTHER (http://pantherdb.org/about.jsp). Additionally, the canonical pathways and functional analyses of the DEGs were generated through the use of IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis) [19]. All datasets used in the RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis are available at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE125765 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE125765).

2.7. Quantitative PCR analysis

To verify the RNA-seq analysis data, six genes (Il1rn, Batf, Tlr4, Il6, Il23a and Tnf) associated with innate immune response were selected and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Briefly, mRNA was reverse-transcribed using a Quantitect Nova Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Real-time PCR was performed with 2 μl of cDNA using the Rotor-Gene SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) and Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR cycler (Qiagen). The cycling parameters were as follows: 95°C for 5 min for one cycle followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 45 sec. The Gapdh gene was used as an internal control. The primers used are listed in S1 Table. Relative expression was calculated using the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCT) method. Additionally, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated in Microsoft Excel.

2.8. Sampling

At 2 wpi, serum samples, nasal washes, genital secretions and fecal excretions were obtained from the mice (n = 5). Briefly, blood samples were collected from the heart and centrifuged for sera preparation (1000 × g, 10 min at 4°C). The nasal washes were collected by injection of 300 μl PBS through the trachea towards the nose and centrifugation (1,000 × g, 10 min at 4°C). For genital secretion samples, the genitals were harvested and chopped in 1 ml of PBS, and the supernatants were collected by centrifugation (16,000 × g, 5 min at 4°C). The fecal samples were weighed, dissolved in to PBS (1 w/v%), and centrifuged (16,000 × g, 5 min at 4°C). All of the PBS used for sample collection included a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, USA) and the samples were stored at − 70°C until use.

2.9. Detection of IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgA titers

To measure the IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgA titers, an indirect ELISA was performed using obtained samples. For TF-untagged antigen preparation, the recombinant proteins were cleaved with HRV 3C protease (TaKaRa Bio, JAPAN) at 4°C for 16 h. After SDS-PAGE, the pure proteins without TF, HRV 3C protease, and noncleaved proteins were acquired using a Gel Extraction Kit (Koma Biotech Inc, Seoul, Korea). 96-well microplates were coated by incubating purified recombinant proteins (10 ng/well) in a coating buffer (14.2 mM sodium carbonate, 34.9 mM sodium bicarbonate, and 3.1 mM sodium azide, pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C for an ELISA. The plates were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; bioWORLD, OH, USA) in a solution of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) for 2 h at 37°C. The sera were diluted 1:4000 to detect specific IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a and IgA. For specific IgA detection from wash samples, the nasal wash samples were diluted 1:80, the genital secretions were diluted 1:800, and the fecal excretions were diluted 1:25. After washing with PBST, diluted serum samples were added to the wells and incubated for 2 h at RT. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA), IgG1 (Southern Biotechnology, USA), IgG2a (Southern Biotechnology, USA), and IgA (BioFX Laboratories, USA) diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA were used to detect IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgA, respectively. Total IgA titers in the serum samples, nasal washes, genital secretions and fecal excretions were measured using a Mouse IgA ELISA Ready-SET-Go! Kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The nasal wash samples were diluted 1:80, the genital secretions were diluted 1:800, the fecal excretions were diluted 1:25, and the sera were diluted 1:4000. Color development was performed by adding the substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl-benzidine (TMB; Sigma). The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a VersaMax microplate reader (Molecular Devices Corporation, CA, USA).

2.10. Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences were considered statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05. Differences in titer of IgA were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test for post-hoc analysis. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Preparation of Mdh and CNs-Mdh

To produce B. abortus Mdh, fusion proteins were constructed with a pCold vector containing a chaperone trigger factor (TF) commonly used to produce soluble and functional proteins. As a vector control, TF was also purified. As shown in Fig 1A, the protein sizes of the TF and Mdh were approximately 52 kDa and 85.71 kDa, respectively. Western blotting was also performed using an anti-6X Histag antibody to confirm these proteins. To enhance the immunogenicity and control the release of Mdh, CNs were prepared as adjuvants using the tripolyphosphate (TPP)-based ionic gelation method. The morphology of the particles was assessed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fig 1B shows that the CNs were spherical and less than 200 nm in size. After loading antigens, the sizes of the CNs-TF and CNs-Mdh measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) were 217.8±45.2 nm and 405.0±94 nm, respectively. The LE was 51.45 ± 3.48% and 78.22 ± 0.75%, which means that 1.54 mg of TF and 2.34 mg of Mdh was loaded per 20 mg of CNs.

Fig 1. The confirmation of recombinant B. abortus proteins.

Fig 1

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (A). Lane M: Molecular size standard, 1: Control, TF (53 kDa), 2: Mdh (92.71 kDa). SEM photographs of prepared CNs (B).

3.2. Gene expression

To observe the immune responses induced by antigen and adjuvant, the transcriptome data of the NALT taken 1, 6, and 12 h post-immunization (hpi) with CNs-Mdh were compared to three controls, PBS-, CNs- and TF-immunized group (Fig 2A). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained at each time point and the criteria of p ≤ 0.05 and a fold-change > |2| were chosen to determine significantly up-regulated or down-regulated genes following immunization. Genes commonly regulated between CNs vs PBS (control), CNs-Mdh vs PBS (control) and CNs-TF vs PBS (control) were used to evaluate the effect of CNs. Next, the effect of Mdh was evaluated using CNs-Mdh vs CNs (control) and CNs-TF vs CNs DEGs. Finally, CNs-Mdh vs CNs-TF (control) DEGs were used to identify the effect of Mdh compared to the vector control. The number of DEGs according to time is shown in Fig 2B.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

The experimental design for the analysis of transcriptomic profiling (A). The number of DEGs in each compared subset (B). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained at each time point and the criteria of p ≤ 0.05 and a fold-change > |2| were chosen to determine significantly up-regulated or down-regulated genes following immunization.

3.3. The effect of CNs

DEGs in the CNs vs PBS, CNs-Mdh vs PBS and CNs-TF vs PBS set are shown in Venn diagram (Fig 3A). The number of commonly up-regulated genes was 8 (1 h), 161 (6 h) and 17 (12 h). The number of commonly down-regulated genes was 6 (1 h), 10 (6 h) and 6 (12 h), respectively. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was carried out by PANTHER bioinformatics tools, using these genes. The top 10 GO terms are summarized in Fig 3B. Significantly matched terms in the 1 h data were not detected, showing that GO between CNs- and CNs-Mdh immunized group at 1 hpi were not significantly different. All of the top 10 terms from the 6 hpi and 12 hpi samples were up-regulated terms due to the low enrichment of the down-regulated terms. The results showed that response to other organism became active (GO:0009605; GO:0009607; GO:0043207; GO:0051707) and control of immune response including defense (GO:0006952), response to cytokine (GO:0071345; GO:0034097) and inflammatory response (GO:0006954; GO:0002376; GO:0002682) was matched significantly at 6 hpi. The expression patterns of these genes suggest that antigen recognition progressed from 1 hpi to 6 hpi after administration using CNs. At 12 hpi, the expression levels of genes for migration of neutrophil, granulocyte and leukocyte were matched significantly. In addition, activation of immune response such as complement activation, fever generation and cytokine production was observed at 12 hpi.

Fig 3. Genes and functions that commonly regulated between CNs vs PBS, CNs-TF vs PBS and CNs-Mdh vs PBS.

Fig 3

Venn diagram of DEGs from only the CNs-, CNs-TF and CN-Mdh-immunized groups compared to the PBS-immunized group (A). Gene Ontology enrichment analysis using commonly regulated genes from only the CNs-, CNs-TF and CN-Mdh-immunized groups (B).

3.4. The immunogenicity of Mdh

To identify the immunogenicity of Mdh, DEGs in the CNs-Mdh vs CNs and CNs-TF vs CNs set are compared and Venn diagram was shown in S1A Fig. The number of commonly up-regulated genes was 16 (1 h), 69 (6 h) and 17 (12 h), respectively. The number of commonly down-regulated genes was 20 (1 h), 39 (6 h) and 37 (12 h), respectively. The GO terms analysed by GO enrichment analysis using these genes were shown in S1B Fig. The results showed that development associated with tissue, odontogenesis and epithelial cells was matched, but it showed low fold enrichment. Then, at 12 hpi, response to other organism (GO:0009607; GO:0006950; GO:0009605; GO:0043207) and defense response which were similarly observed at GO analysis of common DEGs at 6 hpi from subset CNs vs PBS, CNs-Mdh vs PBS and CNs-TF vs PBS were matched significantly at 12 hpi.

As compared to CNs-TF- and CNs-immunized group, the number of up-regulated genes in only from CNs-Mdh-immunized group was 59 (1 h), 229 (6 h) and 214 (12 h), respectively. The number of down-regulated genes was 51 (1 h), 139 (6 h) and 128 (12 h), respectively. To determine the specific and major ‘Diseases and function’ affected by CNs-Mdh, the functional annotation of the DEGs using these genes according to the p-value and Z-score (a score of the predicted direction of the pathway) was conducted and top 10 functions were summarized in the Table 1. It showed that genes associated with inflammation of the organs and body cavity were up-regulated at 1 hpi while genes associated with “cell viability” including cell cycle progression, neurons, epithelial cells and muscle cells were down-regulated. Genes related in “differentiation and development of connective tissue cells” were also down-regulated, showing that inflammation responses were induced more than CNs- and CNs-TF-immunized group. Then, at 6 hpi, the functions of “Cell movement”, “Homing of cells”, and “T cell migration” were up-regulated. The function of “Cell viability” was up-regulated at 6 hpi while it was down-regulated at 1 hpi. In addition to the inflammatory response shown at 6 hpi, active movements of leukocytes, phagocytes, granulocytes were observed at 12 hpi, indicating that the inflammatory response was induced.

Table 1. The functional annotation of DEGs from CNs-Mdh vs CNs and vs CNs-TF.

Diseases or Functions Annotation p-Value Predicted Activation State Activation z-score
1h Inflammation of body cavity 0.000267 Increased 2.64
Inflammation of organ 5.22E-05 Increased 2.333
Organismal death 0.000603 Increased 2.012
Cell viability of neurons 0.0000419 Decreased -2.569
Cell viability 0.000218 Decreased -2.925
Cell cycle progression 0.00165 Decreased -2.352
Differentiation of connective tissue cells 5.95E-05 Decreased -2.329
Development of connective tissue cells 1.77E-07 Decreased -2.27
Proliferation of epithelial cell lines 0.000209 Decreased -2.415
Migration of smooth muscle cells 7.71E-05 Decreased -2.198
6h Cell movement 1.09E-19 Increased 4.968
Homing of cells 1.27E-21 Increased 4.57
Leukocyte migration 5.14E-22 Increased 4.567
Migration of cells 3.05E-19 Increased 4.439
Recruitment of phagocytes 2.83E-18 Increased 4.278
Chemotaxis 1.08E-19 Increased 4.19
Recruitment of leukocytes 9.08E-19 Increased 4.071
Cell movement of mononuclear leukocytes 8.70E-10 Increased 4.045
T cell migration 3.11E-07 Increased 3.999
Cell viability 2.38E-10 Increased 3.982
12h Leukocyte migration 7.51E-46 Increased 6.18
Cell movement of leukocytes 9.91E-41 Increased 5.94
Cell movement of phagocytes 9.91E-39 Increased 5.748
Homing of leukocytes 1.47E-32 Increased 5.744
Chemotaxis of leukocytes 3.50E-31 Increased 5.498
Cell movement of mononuclear leukocytes 1.17E-19 Increased 5.183
Cell movement of granulocytes 4.51E-42 Increased 5.151
Inflammatory response 3.86E-47 Increased 5.134
Adhesion of immune cells 1.21E-33 Increased 5.097
Chemotaxis of phagocytes 6.16E-30 Increased 5.08

3.5. The activated signaling pathways

The canonical pathway analysis of DEG subsets from CNs-Mdh vs CNs-TF was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. The top 20 pathways according to the p-value and Z-score (a score of the predicted direction of the pathway) are included in Fig 4. These pathways had a high level of statistical significance; the -log p was higher than 5.0 (Fig 4A) and the Z score (Fig 4B) was higher than 2.0 at the 12 hpi. Signaling pathway analysis revealed that “Dendritic cell maturation”, “High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) Signaling”, “Interleukin (IL)-6 Signaling”, “Acute phase Signaling”, “Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM1) Signaling”, “Production of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species in Macrophages”, “p38 MAPK Signaling”, “NF-κB Signaling” and “Toll-like Receptor Signaling” pathways were predicted to be activated significantly (both p value and Z score) after immunization with CNs-Mdh. Among them, “HMGB1 Signaling” and “IL-6 Signaling” pathways represent overall structure of these key signaling pathways (Fig 5). As shown in Fig 5A, activation of TLR signaling (by TLR4) and inflammatory cells (by IL-1, TNF-α and IFN-γ) activated the NF-κB and MAPK pathways in the HMGB1 pathway. Innate cell activation by HMGB1 that induces pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 plays a role in mediating dendritic cells (DCs) maturation and activation. As a pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-6 signaling pathway was predicted to be significantly activated through the increased expression of Il1b, Il6, NF-kB, NF-IL6, Stat3 and SOCS3 (Fig 5B).

Fig 4. Pathway and functional analyses were performed using the DEG subset from CNs-Mdh vs CNs-TF.

Fig 4

The top 20 canonical pathways as per P-value and Z score. The canonical pathway analyses and function annotations were generated through the use of IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis) [19].

Fig 5. Canonical pathways analyzed using the DEG subset from CNs-Mdh vs CNs-TF.

Fig 5

The significant canonical pathways of ““HMGB1 Signaling” (A) and “IL-6 Signaling” pathways (B) represent overall structure of these key signaling pathways by intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh. These pathways were analyzed by Ingenuity Molecule Activity Predictor (MAP). The red nodes indicate genes significantly up-regulated, and the orange nodes indicate genes predicted to be activated. The intensity of color corresponds to an increase in fold change levels. The canonical pathway and upstream regulators analyses were generated through the use of IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis) [19].

3.6. Activated gene network for mucosal immunity

To predict activation of mucosal immune response and induction of IgA [2023] following intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh, significant gene networks were analyzed (Fig 6). The color of each node indicates its Fc value. According to the gene network analysis, genes related in activation of lymphocytes, chemotaxis and cell movement of DCs were actively expressed and expression of Il1a, Il1b, Tnf, Vip and Csf2rb connected these networks (12 hpi). Additionally, genes involved in synthesis of retinoic acid (Aldh1a3), modulators for T cell and DC function (Csf, Csf1, and Csf3), generation of IgA-ASCs and IgA (Tgfb1, Tgfbi, and Cd40) were expressed concomitantly.

Fig 6. Gene networks involved in DCs maturation and mucosal ASCs in NALT.

Fig 6

According to bioinformatics analysis, networks for DCs antigen presentation was induced by activation of lymphocytes and genes related with mucosal ASCs were also highly expressed. The gene networks analyses were generated through the use of IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis) [19].

To confirm the production of IgA, specific IgA and total IgA were detected in sera, nasal wash, fecal excretions and genital secretions after 2 wpi. In addition, specific IgG levels were measured for sera. For specific IgA (Fig 7A), significant production of IgA was detected in the fecal excretions and genital secretions from the CNs-Mdh-immunized group compared to CNs-TF-immunized group. However, no significant differences were observed in the nasal wash and serum IgA levels between the CNs-TF and CNs-Mdh-immunized groups. In addition to specific IgA, the CNs-Mdh elicited a significantly higher titer of specific IgG than CNs-TF-immunized group which served as the vector control (Fig 7B). The main subtype produced after immunization was IgG1, while the titer of IgG2a was not significantly enhanced following immunization. For total IgA (Fig 7C), titers of IgA in genital secretions and fecal excretions were significantly increased in CNs-Mdh-immunized group compared to those following the CNs-TF-immunization. In the nasal washes, a significantly high titer of IgA in the CNs-Mdh-immunized group was measured, compared to the PBS- and CNs-immunized groups. However, there were no significant differences in sera.

Fig 7. Antibody measurements at 2 weeks after primary intranasal immunization.

Fig 7

(A) Specific IgA antibodies in sera, nasal wash, fecal extract, and genital secretions. Significant production of IgA was detected in the fecal excretions and genital secretions from the CNs-Mdh-immunized group compared to CNs-TF-immunized group. (B) Specific IgG antibodies at 2 wpi. The CNs-Mdh elicited a significantly higher titer of specific IgG than that of the CNs-TF-immunized group which served as the vector control. The main subtype produced after immunization was IgG1, while the titer of IgG2a was not significantly enhanced following immunization. (C) Total IgA antibodies in sera, nasal wash, fecal extract, and genital secretions. Titers of IgA in genital secretions and fecal excretions were significantly increased in CNs-Mdh-immunized group compared with those following the CNs-TF-immunization. In the nasal washes, a high titer of IgA in the CNs-Mdh-immunized group was measured, indicating significance compared to the PBS- and CNs-immunized groups. However, there were no significant differences in sera. Groups were statistically compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test. The results for specific antibodies are expressed as the sample to negative control (PBS) ratio (S/N ratio).

3.7. Validation of RNA-seq data

To verify the RNA-seq results, qRT-PCR was conducted using the same experimental RNA samples with six genes (Il1rn, Batf, Tlr4, Il6, Il23a and Tnf) associated with the innate immune response including the IL-6 signaling, HMGB1 signaling and DCs maturation. The correlation coefficient of the expression values from the RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data was 0.92048 (S2 Fig).

4. Discussion

Over the years, many studies have investigated the immunogenic antigens of Brucella abortus. Among these antigens, Mdh have been shown to be promising antigen candidate for a Brucella spp. vaccine both in vitro and in vivo in our previous studies [5, 14]. In the present study, B. abortus Mdh were loaded in the mucoadhesive adjuvant, CNs, and CNs-Mdh were intranasally immunized into the mice. The transcriptomic analysis of the NALT from CNs-Mdh-immunized mice was performed with time-series data to examine the responses of nasal cavity, the target site of nasal immunization. In addition, the induction of mucosal and systemic humoral immunity was investigated.

As valuable polymers, CNs have been demonstrated due to their ability to enhance mucosal absorption, mucosal adhesion, and control the release of antigens [11]. In this study, the spherical features of the prepared CNs were confirmed by SEM. The DLS results showed that protein-loaded CNs were larger after loading of the antigens. As many studies have shown, particle size is critical for absorption in the mucosal membrane and avoiding clearance in the airways [24]. Recent studies have demonstrated that M cells participate in antigen uptake from the nasal cavity to the NALT [25, 26]. The M cells from the intestine have been reported to transport antigen to the Peyer’s patches, the local lymphoid tissue in the gut [26]. The preferred particle size for uptake by the M cells is < 1 μm [27]. The size of the nanoparticles in the present study was < 1μm, and it is assumed that CNs-Mdh could be transported to the NALT.

When antigen is inhaled, pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages determine the origin of the antigens [28]. This antigen presentation leads to antibody-secreting cells (ASCs). Adaptive immunity is known to be controlled by PRRs-induced signals, which instruct when and how to respond to a particular infection [28, 29]. At the 6 hpi, group of CNs-Mdh, CNs-TF and CNs alone, the expressions of common genes involved in response to other organism were increased in NALT. Our results indicate that the CNs were recognized by PRRs on the immune cells during the 1 hpi to 6 hpi, inducing defense and cytokine response. This result is consistent with previous studies showing that CNs have an immune-enhancing effect [10, 11].

Detailed bioinformatic analysis of DEGs suggested that genes associated with cell viability of neurons, epithelial cells and muscle cells were down-regulated at 1hpi in CNs-Mdh-immunized group as compared to other immunized group. Then, genes associated with active movement of immune cells including T cell, leukocytes, phagocytes and granulocytes in NALT were gradually up-regulated at 6-12hpi, indicating that the antigen recognition was activated. In addition, pathway analysis showed that the DEGs were significantly enriched in multiple inflammatory pathways including “IL-6 Signaling” and “HMGB1 Signaling” in CNs-Mdh-immunized group.

IL-6 has been indicated as a key cytokine to the control of Th1/Th2 differentiation [30]. Cellular response (Th1) is characterized by production of IgG2a and known to be crucial to overcome the bacterial infection [31]. Humoral response (Th2), which mainly produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-6 and IL-10, is also characterized by production of IgG1 [30, 32]. Protective immunity of host against B. abortus is likely to be mediated by complicated balance between Th1 and Th2 related immune responses. A recent study showed that IL-6 contribute to resistance against B. abortus in macrophages and CD8+ T cell differentiation, priming the cellular response during the Brucella infection [33]. In addition, the antibody profile of regimens vaccinated with the live attenuated vaccine strains for brucellosis, S19 and RB51, were reported to be predominantly IgG1 whereas they are known to induce strong cellular immunity [34]. Although DEGs from CNs-Mdh vs CNs-TF showed that Th17 pathway were potentially activated at 6 hpi, activation of IL-6 signaling pathway was more statistically significant. At the 2 wpi, the production of specific IgG1 and IgG2a in sera indicates that a mixed Th1-Th2 response were elicited by CNs-Mdh. In addition, intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh induced systemic mucosal immunity with Th2-related response at 6 wpi in our previous study. The CD4+ T cells from NALT of naïve mice were reported to be Th0 cells, suggesting that T helper subsets could be differentiated into the Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells within NALT correspondingly to the antigen [35]. Taken together, these results suggest that immunocompetent cells in NALT activated IL-6 signaling pathway, elicited a mixed Th1-Th2 repsponse in early stages and then finally differentiated into Th2 by CNs-Mdh.

Recent findings have highlighted that HMGB1 pathway is crucial not only for the inducing inflammatory responses of upper respiratory tract (URT) but also for mediating DCs maturation and activation [3639]. HMGB1 is a archetypical alarmin that can act as a danger signal that initiates the host defense response [40]. HMGB1 signaling was suggested as a immunostimulatory signal that induces DC maturation and T-cell-mediated immunity in rat [39]. Shimizu et al. showed that nasal secretions contain substantial amounts of HMGB1 and TNF-α stimulation induces the production of HMGB1, which, in turn, upregulates the production of IL-6 and IL-8 by nasal epithelial cells via TLR 4 [38]. In our results, HMGB1 pathway via TLR4 as well as IL-6 signaling and DCs maturation were predicted to be activated in CNs-Mdh-immunized group. Another study showed that oral administration of a representative mucosal adjuvant, cholera toxin, triggers the release of HMGB1 from damaged intestinal epithelial cells, and that the released HMGB1 may mediate the activation of mucosal DCs, cytotoxic T lymphocytes and IgA production in the intestine [37]. Although the relationship between innate immune pathway and production of IgA is still not well defined, we reasonably assume that activated HMGB1 signaling pathways with IL-6 signaling and DCs maturation are shown by CNs-Mdh due to the relevance of followed production of IgA.

Secretory IgA-mediated mucosal immunity is not always induced through mucosal immunization [41]. To produce IgA, homing of IgA-ASCs in the mucosa is required. DCs in NALT present intranasally administered antigens to naive B lymphocytes, by expressing type 1 retinoic acid, nitric oxide (NO) and proliferation-inducing ligand [2023]. In addition, when B cells are activated by T cell-dependent antigens that elicit helper CD4 T-cell responses, they become either ASCs [22, 23]. According to the transcriptomic analysis, genes related in activation of lymphocytes, chemotaxis and cell movement of DCs were actively expressed at NALT following CNs-Mdh immunization. Gene networks also showed that expression of Il1a, Il1b, Tnf, Vip, and Csf2rb connected these networks. Additionally, genes involved in synthesis of retinoic acid (Aldh1a3) [42], modulators for T cell and DC function (Csf, Csf1, and Csf3) [43], generation of IgA-ASCs and IgA (Tgfb1, Tgfbi, and Cd40) [44] were expressed concomitantly. In the ELISA results, significant titers of antigen specific IgA in genital secretions and fecal excretion and total IgA in nasal wash, genital secretions and fecal excretion were observed in the CNs-Mdh immunized group at 2 wpi. These activated pathways and gene networks may have led to the statistically difference in titer of systemic IgA.

Collectively, intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh triggered differentially gene expression associated with cellular movement of immune cells, IL-6 signaling pathway, HMGB1 signaling pathway and DCs maturation within NALT. In addition, significantly increased amount of systemic IgA and a mixed Th1-Th2 response were elicited in CNs-Mdh immunized group at 2wpi. These results suggest that B. abortus Mdh-loaded CNs drives the IL-6 signaling and HMGB1 signaling pathway followed by DCs maturation in URT, and the significantly increased production of antigen-specific IgA and IgG.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. The ARRIVE guidelines checklist.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Genes and functions that commonly regulated between CNs-Mdh vs CNs and CNs-TF vs CNs.

(A) Venn diagram of DEGs from only the CN-Mdh- and CN-TF-immunized groups compared to the CNs-immunized group. (B) Gene Ontology enrichment analysis using commonly regulated genes from only the CN-Mdh and CN-TF-immunized groups.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Correlation of gene expression values between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR.

The six validated genes (Il1rn, Batf, Tlr4, Il6, Il23a and Tnf) were important for the inflammatory response and differentiation of Th17 cells.

(TIF)

S1 Raw image

(PDF)

S1 Table. Primers used for qRT-PCR.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Hobin Lee for help with making nanoparticles. We thank The National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management (NICEM) for help with the SEM and DLS analyses. We thank TERAGEN for RNA-seq.

Data Availability

All datasets used in the RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis are available at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE125765 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE125765).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Strategic Initiative for Microbiomes in Agriculture and Food, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (No. 918020-4), Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (No. HI16C2130) and the Brain Korea (BK) 21 PLUS program for Creative Veterinary Science Research and the Research Institute of Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea.

References

  • 1.Gwida M, Al Dahouk S, Melzer F, Rosler U, Neubauer H, Tomaso H. Brucellosis—regionally emerging zoonotic disease? Croatian medical journal. 2010;51(4):289–95. Epub 2010/08/19. 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carvalho TF, Haddad JP, Paixao TA, Santos RL. Meta-Analysis and Advancement of Brucellosis Vaccinology. PloS one. 2016;11(11):e0166582 Epub 2016/11/16. 10.1371/journal.pone.0166582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lowry JE, Goodridge L, Vernati G, Fluegel AM, Edwards WH, Andrews GP. Identification of Brucella abortus genes in elk (Cervus elaphus) using in vivo-induced antigen technology (IVIAT) reveals novel markers of infection. Veterinary microbiology. 2010;142(3–4):367–72. Epub 2009/11/17. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.10.010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lowry JE, Isaak DD, Leonhardt JA, Vernati G, Pate JC, Andrews GP. Vaccination with Brucella abortus recombinant in vivo-induced antigens reduces bacterial load and promotes clearance in a mouse model for infection. PloS one. 2011;6(3):e17425 Epub 2011/03/18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Im YB, Shim S, Soh SH, Kim S, Yoo HS. Cytokines production and toll-like receptors expression in human leukemic monocyte cells, THP-1, stimulated with Brucella abortus cellular antigens. Microbial pathogenesis. 2018;122:7–12. Epub 2018/06/09. 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.06.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Golding B, Scott DE, Scharf O, Huang LY, Zaitseva M, Lapham C, et al. Immunity and protection against Brucella abortus. Microbes and infection. 2001;3(1):43–8. Epub 2001/02/28. 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)01350-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lamichhane A, Azegamia T, Kiyonoa H. The mucosal immune system for vaccine development. Vaccine. 2014;32(49):6711–23. Epub 2014/12/03. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.089 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li HS, Shin MK, Singh B, Maharjan S, Park TE, Kang SK, et al. Nasal immunization with mannan-decorated mucoadhesive HPMCP microspheres containing ApxIIA toxin induces protective immunity against challenge infection with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoiae in mice. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2016;233:114–25. Epub 2016/05/18. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.032 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pasquevich KA, Garcia Samartino C, Coria LM, Estein SM, Zwerdling A, Ibanez AE, et al. The protein moiety of Brucella abortus outer membrane protein 16 is a new bacterial pathogen-associated molecular pattern that activates dendritic cells in vivo, induces a Th1 immune response, and is a promising self-adjuvanting vaccine against systemic and oral acquired brucellosis. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2010;184(9):5200–12. Epub 2010/03/31. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902209 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gan Q, Wang T, Cochrane C, McCarron P. Modulation of surface charge, particle size and morphological properties of chitosan-TPP nanoparticles intended for gene delivery. Colloids and surfaces B, Biointerfaces. 2005;44(2–3):65–73. Epub 2005/07/19. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.06.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Illum L, Jabbal-Gill I, Hinchcliffe M, Fisher AN, Davis SS. Chitosan as a novel nasal delivery system for vaccines. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2001;51(1–3):81–96. Epub 2001/08/23. 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00171-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zuercher AW, Coffin SE, Thurnheer MC, Fundova P, Cebra JJ. Nasal-associated lymphoid tissue is a mucosal inductive site for virus-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2002;168(4):1796–803. Epub 2002/02/02. 10.4049/jimmunol.168.4.1796 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kiyono H, Fukuyama S. NALT- versus Peyer's-patch-mediated mucosal immunity. Nature reviews Immunology. 2004;4(9):699–710. Epub 2004/09/03. 10.1038/nri1439 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Soh SH, Shim S, Im YB, Park HT, Cho CS, Yoo HS. Induction of Th2-related immune responses and production of systemic IgA in mice intranasally immunized with Brucella abortus malate dehydrogenase loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Vaccine. 2019;37(12):1554–64. Epub 2019/02/23. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Im YB, Shim S, Park WB, Kim S, Yoo HS. Th2-related immune responses by the Brucella abortus cellular antigens, malate dehydrogenase, elongation factor, and arginase. Microbial pathogenesis. 2017;110:7–13. Epub 2017/06/21. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Asanuma H, Thompson AH, Iwasaki T, Sato Y, Inaba Y, Aizawa C, et al. Isolation and characterization of mouse nasal-associated lymphoid tissue. Journal of immunological methods. 1997;202(2):123–31. Epub 1997/03/28. 10.1016/s0022-1759(96)00243-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2009;25(9):1105–11. Epub 2009/03/18. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature biotechnology. 2010;28(5):511–5. Epub 2010/05/04. 10.1038/nbt.1621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kramer A, Green J, Pollard J Jr., Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2014;30(4):523–30. Epub 2013/12/18. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mora JR, von Andrian UH. Differentiation and homing of IgA-secreting cells. Mucosal immunology. 2008;1(2):96–109. Epub 2008/12/17. 10.1038/mi.2007.14 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Takaki H, Ichimiya S, Matsumoto M, Seya T. Mucosal Immune Response in Nasal-Associated Lymphoid Tissue upon Intranasal Administration by Adjuvants. Journal of innate immunity. 2018;10(5–6):515–21. Epub 2018/06/04. 10.1159/000489405 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brandtzaeg P. Secretory IgA: Designed for Anti-Microbial Defense. Frontiers in immunology. 2013;4:222 Epub 2013/08/22. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bemark M, Boysen P, Lycke NY. Induction of gut IgA production through T cell-dependent and T cell-independent pathways. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012;1247:97–116. Epub 2012/01/21. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06378.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moller W, Haussinger K, Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Heyder J. Mucociliary and long-term particle clearance in airways of patients with immotile cilia. Respiratory research. 2006;7:10 Epub 2006/01/21. 10.1186/1465-9921-7-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim DY, Sato A, Fukuyama S, Sagara H, Nagatake T, Kong IG, et al. The airway antigen sampling system: respiratory M cells as an alternative gateway for inhaled antigens. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2011;186(7):4253–62. Epub 2011/03/02. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903794 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Date Y, Ebisawa M, Fukuda S, Shima H, Obata Y, Takahashi D, et al. NALT M cells are important for immune induction for the common mucosal immune system. International immunology. 2017;29(10):471–8. Epub 2017/12/01. 10.1093/intimm/dxx064 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.des Rieux A, Fievez V, Garinot M, Schneider YJ, Preat V. Nanoparticles as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: a mechanistic approach. Journal of controlled release. 2006;116(1):1–27. Epub 2006/10/20. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nature immunology. 2015;16(4):343–53. Epub 2015/03/20. 10.1038/ni.3123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Palm NW, Medzhitov R. Pattern recognition receptors and control of adaptive immunity. Immunological reviews. 2009;227(1):221–33. Epub 2009/01/06. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00731.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Diehl S, Rincon M. The two faces of IL-6 on Th1/Th2 differentiation. Molecular immunology. 2002;39(9):531–6. Epub 2002/11/15. 10.1016/s0161-5890(02)00210-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Araya LN, Winter AJ, Comparative protection of mice against virulent and attenuated strains of Brucella abortus by passive transfer of immune T cells or serum. Infect Immun 1990;58(1):254–6. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rincón M, Anguita J, Nakamura T, Fikrig E, Flavell RA, Interleukin (IL)-6 directs the differentiation of IL-4–producing CD4+ T cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 1997; 3:185(3):461–9. PMC2196041. 10.1084/jem.185.3.461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hop HT, Huy TXN, Reyes AWB, Arayan LT, Vu SH, Min W, et al. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) promotes Brucella abortus clearance by controlling bactericidal activity of macrophages and CD8(+) T cell differentiation. Infect Immun. 2019; 18;87(11). 10.1128/IAI.00431-19 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dorneles EM, Lima GK, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Araujo M.S, Martins-Filho OA, Sriranganathan N, et al. Immune Response of Calves Vaccinated with Brucella abortus S19 or RB51 and Revaccinated with RB51. PloS one 2015;10, e0136696 10.1371/journal.pone.0136696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hiroi T, Iwatani K, Iijima H, Kodama S, Yanagita M, Kiyono H. Nasal immune system: distinctive Th0 and Th1/Th2 type environments in murine nasal-associated lymphoid tissues and nasal passage, respectively. European journal of immunology. 1998;28(10):3346–53. Epub 1998/11/10. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang F, Huang G, Hu B, Fang LP, Cao EH, Xin XF, et al. Anti-HMGB1 neutralizing antibody ameliorates neutrophilic airway inflammation by suppressing dendritic cell-mediated Th17 polarization. Mediators of inflammation. 2014;2014:257930 Epub 2014/06/25. 10.1155/2014/257930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wakabayashi A, Shimizu M, Shinya E, Takahashi H. HMGB1 released from intestinal epithelia damaged by cholera toxin adjuvant contributes to activation of mucosal dendritic cells and induction of intestinal cytotoxic T lymphocytes and IgA. Cell death & disease. 2018;9(6):631 Epub 2018/05/26. 10.1038/s41419-018-0665-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shimizu S, Kouzaki H, Kato T, Tojima I, Shimizu T. HMGB1-TLR4 signaling contributes to the secretion of interleukin 6 and interleukin 8 by nasal epithelial cells. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2016;30(3):167–72. Epub 2016/05/25. 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4300 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhu XM, Yao YM, Liang HP, Xu S, Dong N, Yu Y, et al. The effect of high mobility group box-1 protein on splenic dendritic cell maturation in rats. Journal of interferon & cytokine research: the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research. 2009;29(10):677–86. Epub 2009/08/01. 10.1089/jir.2008.0104 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Klune JR, Dhupar R, Cardinal J, Billiar TR, Tsung A. HMGB1: endogenous danger signaling. Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass). 2008;14(7–8):476–84. Epub 2008/04/24. 10.2119/2008-00034.Klune [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chew JL, Wolfowicz CB, Mao HQ, Leong KW, Chua KY. Chitosan nanoparticles containing plasmid DNA encoding house dust mite allergen, Der p 1 for oral vaccination in mice. Vaccine. 2003;21(21–22):2720–9. Epub 2003/06/12. 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00228-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Niu H, Hadwiger G, Fujiwara H, Welch JS. Pathways of retinoid synthesis in mouse macrophages and bone marrow cells. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2016;99(6):797–810. Epub 2016/01/16. 10.1189/jlb.2HI0415-146RR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.van de Laar L, Coffer PJ, Woltman AM. Regulation of dendritic cell development by GM-CSF: molecular control and implications for immune homeostasis and therapy. Blood. 2012;119(15):3383–93. Epub 2012/02/11. 10.1182/blood-2011-11-370130 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Konkel JE, Chen W. Balancing acts: the role of TGF-beta in the mucosal immune system. Trends in molecular medicine. 2011;17(11):668–76. Epub 2011/09/06. 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yung-Fu Chang

5 Dec 2019

PONE-D-19-28863

Induction of Systemic Immunity Through Nasal-associated Lymphoid Tissue (NALT) of Mice Intranasally Immunized with Brucella abortus malate dehydrogenase-loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yoo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Your manuscript has been reviewed by an expert in your field. Based on the critiques from the reviewer, a  major revision is requirement before a final decision can be made.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by 4 weeks. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yung-Fu Chang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. As part of your revision, please complete and submit a copy of the ARRIVE Guidelines checklist, a document that aims to improve experimental reporting and reproducibility of animal studies for purposes of post-publication data analysis and reproducibility: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines. Please include your completed checklist as a Supporting Information file. Note that if your paper is accepted for publication, this checklist will be published as part of your article.

3. We note that you are reporting an analysis of a microarray, next-generation sequencing, or deep sequencing data set. PLOS requires that authors comply with field-specific standards for preparation, recording, and deposition of data in repositories appropriate to their field. Please upload these data to a stable, public repository (such as ArrayExpress, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ), NCBI GenBank, NCBI Sequence Read Archive, or EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database (ENA)). In your revised cover letter, please provide the relevant accession numbers that may be used to access these data. For a full list of recommended repositories, see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-omics or http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-sequencing.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Overall, the manuscript is well written and the experimental design is straightforward and easy to understand. However, the authors are over-reaching in their conclusions based on the available data and there are some immunological concepts that need to be revised throughout the manuscript. The authors should consider two key points: 1) Chitosan has natural adjuvant activity in that it induces dendritic cell activation to promote TH1 responses, mediated through STING, which doesn’t quite fit with the authors conclusion of a TH2-type of response, nor does the data really support the conclusion that a TH2 response has been induced; and 2) For Brucella clearance, induction of a TH1 response is necessary, so induction of a TH2 response in not a desirable outcome from a vaccine against brucellosis. The authors should consider this and address it in their discussion.

Below are some of the primary concerns regarding immunological concepts throughout the manuscript:

Line 306-307: “….active movement of leukocytes, phagocytes, granulocytes….indicating that the antigen recognition was activated.” Migration of these cells is not indicative of antigen recognition, but rather inflammation. Sentence should be revised.

Line 329-330. Referring to IL-1beta, IL-6, NF-kB, etc. as inducers of Th2 responses needs revision. The mentioned molecules are indeed involved in the proinflammatory response, but not necessarily specific drivers of Th2 differentiation.

Line 439-440: “IL-6 has been indicated as a key cytokine for the differentiation of Th2 cells in both mice and humans.” IL-6 is involved in both TH1 and TH2 responses, and at the early stages that these samples are being analyzed, the skewing of adaptive immune responses cannot be determined. Sentence should be revised.

Line 480-482: This is overinterpretation of the data. The work simply shows that upregulation of HMGB1, IL-6, and DC maturation at the early time points after immunization may be correlated to increased IgA production at 2 wpi. These experiment were not designed to show causation.

The IgG and IgA data is not very impressive. While there is statistical significance, the levels of total IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a are not very high when compared to the rest of the experimental groups. Perhaps looking at later time points would have helped enhance that response. Additionally, the antibody data does not support the induction of a TH2 response, rather, it appears mixed. Other parameters such as cytokine production from recall responses would have been a better approach to demonstrate the type of immune response that was induced by this type of immunization.

It should be noted that there is no mention of antibody data in the introduction of the manuscript, yet the authors utilize the antibody data to tie in their transcriptomic data to an immunological phenotype. It is in the trying connect these two pieces of data (i.e. gene expression and humoral responses) that the manuscript loses its strength, as these data are not congruent with one another.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228463.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Dec 2019

Comments from the editor and reviewers:

I would like to thank for the comments from reviewer. Comments from reviewer make improve our manuscript. We revised our manuscript based the comments and tried our best to revise.

- Reviewer's comments:

Reviewer #1

1. Overall, the manuscript is well written and the experimental design is straightforward and easy to understand. However, the authors are over-reaching in their conclusions based on the available data and there are some immunological concepts that need to be revised throughout the manuscript. The authors should consider two key points: 1) Chitosan has natural adjuvant activity in that it induces dendritic cell activation to promote TH1 responses, mediated through STING, which doesn’t quite fit with the authors conclusion of a TH2-type of response, nor does the data really support the conclusion that a TH2 response has been induced; and 2) For Brucella clearance, induction of a TH1 response is necessary, so induction of a TH2 response in not a desirable outcome from a vaccine against brucellosis. The authors should consider this and address it in their discussion.

Answer.

We appreciate your valuable comment. As your opinion, we might have jumped to the conclusion. In our previous study, intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh induced systemic mucosal immunity with Th2-related response at 6 wpi [1]. In this study, we aimed to observe whether our antigens properly activate the NALT, the target site of the immunization, and the antibody is produced after intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh. The pathway analysis showed that the DEGs were significantly enriched in multiple inflammatory pathways including “IL-6 Signaling”, "Dendritic cells maturation" and “HMGB1 Signaling” in CNs-Mdh-immunized group. At the 2 wpi, the production of specific IgG1 and IgG2a in sera indicates that a mixed Th1-Th2 response were elicited by CNs-Mdh. Taken together, we concluded that immunocompetent cells in NALT activated IL-6 signaling pathway and DCs maturation in early time point and elicited a mixed Th1-Th2 response in early stages, then finally differentiated into Th2 by CNs-Mdh. Therefore, we revised the concept of the manuscript (Lines 451-459).

Until now, the vaccines inducing cellular immunity have been known to be effective for intracellular bacteria. However, the subunit vaccines which induce not only humoral immunity but also complex immune response are being suggested as a replacement to the existing vaccines recently [2]. In addition, protective immunity of host against Brucella abortus is mediated by both cellular and humoral immune responses. A recent study showed that IL-6 promotes Brucella abortus clearance in macrophages and CD8+ T cell differentiation, priming the Th1 response during Brucella infection [3]. The live attenuated vaccine strains for brucellosis, S19 and RB51 are known to induce strong cellular immunity, but the antibody profile observed in both regimens were reported as predominantly IgG1 [2]. This discrepancy suggests that the course of infection and immune protection against Brucella involves complicated balance between Th1 and Th2 related immune response.

We tried to suggest not only the new antigen delivery system, but also a convenient method to induce systematic IgG and IgA immune responses with relatively small amount of Brucella antigen. In addition, a functional assessment of this antibody is planned for further study by modulating infection. We believe that this study could contribute to the development of subunit vaccine. Finally, the sentences about protective immunity against Brucella were added in the discussion (Lines 443-449). Thank you.

2. Line 306-307: “….active movement of leukocytes, phagocytes, granulocytes….indicating that the antigen recognition was activated.” Migration of these cells is not indicative of antigen recognition, but rather inflammation. Sentence should be revised.

Answer.

The sentence has been amended as recommended (Lines 309-310).

3. Line 329-330. Referring to IL-1beta, IL-6, NF-kB, etc. as inducers of Th2 responses needs revision. The mentioned molecules are indeed involved in the proinflammatory response, but not necessarily specific drivers of Th2 differentiation.

Answer.

The sentence has been amended as recommended (Lines 330-332).

4. Line 439-440: “IL-6 has been indicated as a key cytokine for the differentiation of Th2 cells in both mice and humans.” IL-6 is involved in both TH1 and TH2 responses, and at the early stages that these samples are being analyzed, the skewing of adaptive immune responses cannot be determined. Sentence should be revised.

Answer.

The sentence has been amended as recommended (Line 440).

5. Line 480-482: This is overinterpretation of the data. The work simply shows that upregulation of HMGB1, IL-6, and DC maturation at the early time points after immunization may be correlated to increased IgA production at 2 wpi. These experiment were not designed to show causation.

Answer.

We appreciate your valuable comment. As the relationship between innate immune pathway and production of IgA is still not well defined, we found other studies about HMGB1 signaling, IL-6 signaling, DCs maturation and genes related to production of IgA as we described in the manuscript (Lines 465-487). Since the secretory IgA-mediated mucosal immunity is not always induced through mucosal immunization at local site, we thought that activated pathways and gene network induced by CNs-Mdh were related to production of IgA. However, as your opinion, we have not examined causative relationship and we revised the sentence (Lines 489-490). Thank you.

6. The IgG and IgA data is not very impressive. While there is statistical significance, the levels of total IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a are not very high when compared to the rest of the experimental groups. Perhaps looking at later time points would have helped enhance that response. Additionally, the antibody data does not support the induction of a TH2 response, rather, it appears mixed. Other parameters such as cytokine production from recall responses would have been a better approach to demonstrate the type of immune response that was induced by this type of immunization.

Answer.

We appreciate for your valuable comment. As we described above, we revised the concept of the manuscript. In addition, here is the reason we looked the early time point; since we observed humoral responses at 4wpi and 6 wpi in our previous study [1], we aimed to observe whether our antigens properly activate the NALT and the antibody is produced after intranasal immunization of CNs-Mdh in this study. We regarded 2 weeks long enough, considering the production of IgG and IgA after antigen recognition in NALT and inducing systemic response. It would be more helpful to observe enough cytokines produced by recall responses, but considering high prices of RNA-seq and the number of samples, we had to selectively observe the transcriptomic data and antibody. I hope your understanding on our current limitation on resources.

7. It should be noted that there is no mention of antibody data in the introduction of the manuscript, yet the authors utilize the antibody data to tie in their transcriptomic data to an immunological phenotype. It is in the trying connect these two pieces of data (i.e. gene expression and humoral responses) that the manuscript loses its strength, as these data are not congruent with one another.

Answer.

We appreciate for your valuable comment. We added sentence explaining the reason we have investigated the titer of antibody in introduction (lines 68-72; 80-81).

[References]

1. Soh SH, Shim S, Im YB, Park HT, Cho CS, Yoo HS. Induction of Th2-related immune responses and production of systemic IgA in mice intranasally immunized with Brucella abortus malate dehydrogenase loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Vaccine. 2019;37(12):1554-64.

2. Dorneles EM, Lima GK, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Araujo MS, Martins-Filho OA, Sriranganathan N, Qublan H, Heinemann MB, Lage AP, 2015. Immune Response of Calves Vaccinated with Brucella abortus S19 or RB51 and Revaccinated with RB51. PLOS one 10, e0136696.

3. Hop HT, Huy TXN, Reyes AWB, Arayan LT, Vu SH, Min W, Lee HJ, Kang CK, Kim DH, Tark DS, Kim S, 2019. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) promotes Brucella abortus clearance by controlling bactericidal activity of macrophages and CD8(+) T cell differentiation. Infect Immun. 18;87(11).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Yung-Fu Chang

16 Jan 2020

Induction of Systemic Immunity Through Nasal-associated Lymphoid Tissue (NALT) of Mice Intranasally Immunized with Brucella abortus malate dehydrogenase-loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles

PONE-D-19-28863R1

Dear Dr. Yoo,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Yung-Fu Chang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Yung-Fu Chang

21 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-28863R1

Induction of Systemic Immunity Through Nasal-associated Lymphoid Tissue (NALT) of Mice Intranasally Immunized with Brucella abortus malate dehydrogenase-loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles

Dear Dr. Yoo:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yung-Fu Chang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. The ARRIVE guidelines checklist.

    (PDF)

    S1 Fig. Genes and functions that commonly regulated between CNs-Mdh vs CNs and CNs-TF vs CNs.

    (A) Venn diagram of DEGs from only the CN-Mdh- and CN-TF-immunized groups compared to the CNs-immunized group. (B) Gene Ontology enrichment analysis using commonly regulated genes from only the CN-Mdh and CN-TF-immunized groups.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Correlation of gene expression values between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR.

    The six validated genes (Il1rn, Batf, Tlr4, Il6, Il23a and Tnf) were important for the inflammatory response and differentiation of Th17 cells.

    (TIF)

    S1 Raw image

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. Primers used for qRT-PCR.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All datasets used in the RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis are available at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE125765 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE125765).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES