Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Feb 6;9(6):e01457-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01457-19

Isolation and Whole-Genome Sequencing of 12 Mushroom-Associated Bacterial Strains: an Inquiry-Based Laboratory Exercise in a Genomics Course at the Rochester Institute of Technology

Narayan H Wong a, Andrew J Rosato a, Yara M Rose a, Trevor S Penix a, Janice B Fung a, Alexis L Vanitski a, Christian J Goossen a, Spencer G Bradshaw a, Spencer M Lopp a, Aaron D Pennington a, Vincent M Darmohray a, KayLee K Steiner a, Gina E Kersey a, Karl B Brylow a, Mariel V Pridmore a, Joseph S Hedges a, Patrick Rynkiewicz a, André O Hudson a,
Editor: Jason E Stajichb
PMCID: PMC7005118  PMID: 32029553

Here, we report the isolation, identification, and whole-genome sequences of 12 bacterial strains associated with four mushroom species. The study was done as an inquiry-based exercise in an undergraduate genomics course (BIOL 340) in the Thomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences at the Rochester Institute of Technology.

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the isolation, identification, and whole-genome sequences of 12 bacterial strains associated with four mushroom species. The study was done as an inquiry-based exercise in an undergraduate genomics course (BIOL 340) in the Thomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences at the Rochester Institute of Technology.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The microbiomes of fungi are understudied due to the fact that the majority of data collected thus far are related to agriculturally relevant species and pathogens (13). As genomic techniques are further refined, the ability to study more complex microbial communities can offer vital insights into fungal interactions with the native microflora (4, 5). The overarching goal of this study was to isolate and identify, through whole-genome sequencing, bacteria that associate with mushrooms. This was done as an experiential learning exercise in a genomics course at the Rochester Institute of Technology.

Wild mushrooms were collected from wood surfaces from Black Creek Park (Monroe County, NY; 43.0721°N, 77.8076°W) on 1 September 2019 and identified using the Mushrooms of Northeast North America field guide by George Barron (6). The mushroom samples were cut using a sterile scalpel and were used to inoculate Luria broth (LB), Reasoner’s 2A (R2A) broth, potato dextrose (PD) broth, and tryptic soy broth (TSB). Cultures were grown for 24 to 72 h at 25°C with continuous shaking at 150 rpm. Ten-fold serial dilutions were performed, and dilutions in the range of 10−6 to 10−9 were plated onto the corresponding agar media of LB, R2A, potato dextrose agar (PDA), and tryptic soy agar (TSA) and were incubated for 24 h at room temperature. Colonies were subsequently streaked on the respective media on which they were first grown for purity and were initially chosen for further analyses based on color, size, shape, morphology, and texture.

Using the Qiagen DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit, genomic DNA was isolated from single colonies grown overnight in 5 ml of broth (LB for strains RIT691, RIT692, RIT702, RIT710, RIT711, and RIT714; TSB for RIT693, RIT694, and RIT713; PD for RIT697; and R2A for RIT712). A PCR was performed using the forward primer 341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′), the reverse primer 805R (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′), and GoTaq green to amplify the variable 3 (V3) and V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The PCR conditions used were as follows: 1 cycle at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, and ending with one cycle at 72°C for 10 min. The samples were then held at 4°C. Amplicons were sequenced via the Sanger method using the 341F primer. The 16S V3/V4 nucleotide sequences were used to identify the genera using BLAST searches prior to whole-genome sequencing.

For whole-genome sequencing, 0.2 ng/μl of genomic DNA was fragmented and indexed using a Nextera XT library prep kit per the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA) in the genomics core facility in the School of Life Sciences at the Rochester Institute of Technology. The fragment size range was assessed using a DNA 1000 kit on an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. Average fragment size (800 bp) was combined with Qubit DNA concentration to determine the molarity of sequencing-ready libraries. Samples were normalized to a final loading concentration of 10 pM and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq v3 600-cycle run cartridge with 2 × 250-bp paired-end reads. A total yield of 2.34 × 107 reads was obtained, with an average read length of 231.9 bp after trimming with MiSeq default parameters. The sequences were assembled using Unicycler (v0.4.8.0) within Galaxy (v19.09.rc1), filtering out contigs shorter than 200 bp (7, 8). QUAST (v5.0.2) was used to generate statistics on the final assemblies (9). Assembled genomes were taxonomically classified using the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) tool (10). Assemblies were submitted as whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing projects to GenBank for annotation using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Assembly Pipeline to look for open reading frames (ORFs), rRNAs, and tRNAs (11). Please note that default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise noted.

Data availability.

Annotation details for each isolate, including accession numbers, are reported in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Sequencing and annotation information for each bacterial isolate

Strain Source Organisma Genome size (bp) No. of contigs Genome coverage (×) N50 (bp) GC content of assembly (%) WGS accession no. SRA accession no. No. of ORFs No. of tRNAs No. of rRNAs
RIT691 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 4,706,300 32 105.65 365,280 54.25 WJYM00000000 SRR10513281 4,291 76 3
RIT692 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,194,327 40 81.09 643,341 54.7 WJYL00000000 SRR10513282 4,671 67 3
RIT693 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,043,199 51 94.78 260,932 54.25 WJYK00000000 SRR10513273 4,611 75 4
RIT694 Trichaptum sp. Bacillus sp. 5,770,030 162 75.91 72,920 35.15 WJYJ00000000 SRR10513274 5,758 63 6
RIT697 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,448,265 48 52.64 294,827 54.59 WJYI00000000 SRR10513275 4,886 70 2
RIT698 Tubaria sp. Acinetobacter guillouiae 4,576,832 132 111.04 71,764 38.16 WJYH00000000 SRR10513276 4,200 66 2
RIT702 Tubaria sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,100,156 47 111.53 498,055 54.71 WJYG00000000 SRR10513277 4,579 69 3
RIT710 Tyromyces sp. Pantoea agglomerans 4,740,543 34 79.32 413,689 55.29 WJYF00000000 SRR10513278 4,329 69 3
RIT711 Tyromyces sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,113,332 116 118.47 205,802 49.5 WJYE00000000 SRR10513279 4,771 81 4
RIT712 Craterellus sp. Raoultella sp. 5,315,152 39 101.14 501,597 56.03 WJYD00000000 SRR10513280 4,907 76 4
RIT713 Craterellus sp. Ewingella americana 5,046,485 44 55.64 225,444 53.81 WJYC00000000 SRR10513283 4,628 73 3
RIT714 Craterellus sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 4,491,469 40 92.98 299,161 53.57 WJYB00000000 SRR10513284 4,119 74 5
a

Unc., uncultured.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Thomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences (GSoLS) and the College of Science at the Rochester Institute of Technology for ongoing support. We also thank the GSoLS biopreparation staff.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Benucci GMN, Bonito GM. 2016. The truffle microbiome: species and geography effects on bacteria associated with fruiting bodies of hypogeous pezizales. Microb Ecol 72:4–8. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0755-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Halsey JA, de Cássia Pereira e Silva M, Andreote FD. 2016. Bacterial selection by mycospheres of Atlantic Rainforest mushrooms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 109:1353–1365. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0734-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mcgee CF. 2018. Microbial ecology of the Agaricus bisporus mushroom cropping process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:1075–1083. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oh S-Y, Kim M, Eimes JA, Lim YW. 2018. Effect of fruiting body bacteria on the growth of Tricholoma matsutake and its related molds. PLoS One 13:e0190948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rossouw W, Korsten L. 2017. Cultivable microbiome of fresh white button mushrooms. Lett Appl Microbiol 64:164–170. doi: 10.1111/lam.12698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barron G. 2014. Mushrooms of northeast North America: Midwest to New England. Partners Publishing, Edmonton, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W537–W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Annotation details for each isolate, including accession numbers, are reported in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Sequencing and annotation information for each bacterial isolate

Strain Source Organisma Genome size (bp) No. of contigs Genome coverage (×) N50 (bp) GC content of assembly (%) WGS accession no. SRA accession no. No. of ORFs No. of tRNAs No. of rRNAs
RIT691 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 4,706,300 32 105.65 365,280 54.25 WJYM00000000 SRR10513281 4,291 76 3
RIT692 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,194,327 40 81.09 643,341 54.7 WJYL00000000 SRR10513282 4,671 67 3
RIT693 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,043,199 51 94.78 260,932 54.25 WJYK00000000 SRR10513273 4,611 75 4
RIT694 Trichaptum sp. Bacillus sp. 5,770,030 162 75.91 72,920 35.15 WJYJ00000000 SRR10513274 5,758 63 6
RIT697 Trichaptum sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,448,265 48 52.64 294,827 54.59 WJYI00000000 SRR10513275 4,886 70 2
RIT698 Tubaria sp. Acinetobacter guillouiae 4,576,832 132 111.04 71,764 38.16 WJYH00000000 SRR10513276 4,200 66 2
RIT702 Tubaria sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,100,156 47 111.53 498,055 54.71 WJYG00000000 SRR10513277 4,579 69 3
RIT710 Tyromyces sp. Pantoea agglomerans 4,740,543 34 79.32 413,689 55.29 WJYF00000000 SRR10513278 4,329 69 3
RIT711 Tyromyces sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 5,113,332 116 118.47 205,802 49.5 WJYE00000000 SRR10513279 4,771 81 4
RIT712 Craterellus sp. Raoultella sp. 5,315,152 39 101.14 501,597 56.03 WJYD00000000 SRR10513280 4,907 76 4
RIT713 Craterellus sp. Ewingella americana 5,046,485 44 55.64 225,444 53.81 WJYC00000000 SRR10513283 4,628 73 3
RIT714 Craterellus sp. Unc. Enterobacteriaceae sp. 4,491,469 40 92.98 299,161 53.57 WJYB00000000 SRR10513284 4,119 74 5
a

Unc., uncultured.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES