Skip to main content
PMC home page
Internal Medicine logoLink to Internal Medicine
. 2019 Jun 27;59(2):153–161. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2521-18

Efficacy of Vonoprazan for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Shu Kiyotoki 1, Jun Nishikawa 2, Isao Sakaida 3
PMCID: PMC7008041  PMID: 31243237

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori can infect the gastric mucosa and cause chronic inflammation, resulting in various diseases, including gastric cancer. Eradication of H. pylori in all infected subjects is recommended; however, the number of H. pylori strains with antibiotic resistance has increased, and the eradication rate has decreased. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, produces a stronger acid-inhibitory effect than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The H. pylori eradication rate with vonoprazan was found to be higher than that with PPIs. The H. pylori eradication rate with vonoprazan-based triple therapy (vonoprazan, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) was approximately 90% and had an incidence of adverse events similar to that of PPIs. We review the current situation of H. pylori eradication in Japan, the first country in which vonoprazan was made available.

Keywords: vonoprazan, Helicobacter pylori, eradication, potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), proton pump inhibitor (PPI)

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori can infect the gastric mucosa and cause gastritis (1-3). Chronic inflammation caused by H. pylori in the gastric mucosa can lead to atrophic gastritis (4, 5), gastroduodenal ulcer (6), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (7), gastric adenocarcinoma (8-10), and even idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (11). These diseases can be prevented or treated by H. pylori eradication, so its eradication in all infected subjects is recommended in order to treat and prevent these diseases (12, 13).

The number of strains of H. pylori with antibiotic resistance has recently increased, and the eradication rate has decreased (14). Resistance to clarithromycin is an important cause of the failure to eradicate H. pylori. To overcome this, eradication regimens that use more kinds of drugs (quadruple therapy), higher doses of drugs, and longer treatment durations (10-14 days) have been recommended (13). The Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report recommends bismuth-containing quadruple therapy or concomitant therapy in areas of high clarithromycin resistance (13).

It has been reported from Japan that triple therapy with vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), offers a higher rate of H. pylori eradication than that of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We herein review the current situation of H. pylori eradication in Japan, the first country in which vonoprazan was made available.

Vonoprazan, A Potassium-competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB)

Vonoprazan fumarate is a P-CAB, which are agents that inhibit H+,K+-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) through reversible K+-competitive ionic binding that results in the inhibition of gastric acid secretion. Because vonoprazan has a relatively high pKa value and is stable in an acidic environment, it can accumulate in the acidic compartment of gastric parietal cells, unlike PPIs. In addition, vonoprazan does not require acid activation, in contrast to PPIs. Thus, vonoprazan can achieve stronger, longer-lasting suppression of gastric acid secretion than PPIs can (15, 16).

The metabolism of PPIs involves cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, and the effects of PPIs are influenced by the CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic polymorphism (17, 18). However, vonoprazan is not affected by CYP2C19, so sufficient inhibition of gastric acid secretion can be obtained in all subjects (19).

Vonoprazan produced rapid, profound, and sustained suppression of gastric acid secretion for over 24 hours in healthy subjects in Japan and the UK in Phase I clinical trials (19, 20). Jenkins et al. showed that the mean intragastric pH was >4.0 at 4 hours after the first administration of vonoprazan, and the acid-suppressing effect was sustained for 24 hours. The pH >5 holding time ratio after the administration of vonoprazan (40 mg) for 7 consecutive days was almost 100.0% among volunteers in Japan and the UK (20).

H. pylori Eradication Rate with Vonoprazan

We searched for comparative studies that examined the rate of H. pylori eradication with vonoprazan-based triple therapies and PPI-based triple therapies using the key words “vonoprazan” and “pylori” in PubMed on November 1, 2018. Excluding the studies that did not show detailed data, 6 prospective studies (21-26) and 12 retrospective studies (27-38) were assessed. The results of the studies are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparative Studies of H. Pylori First-line Eradication Therapy with Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors.

References Study design Triple therapy regimen Eradication rate (95% CI) Adverse events (discontinuation)
Vonoprazan PPI Vonoprazan PPI
ITT/FAS PP ITT/FAS PP Vonoprazan PPI
(24) Prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=1,688 RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=76 (RPZ), 71 (EPZ) NA 90.8% NA RPZ 68.4%, EPZ 77.5% NA (0%) NA (0%)
(27) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=111 RPZ 10 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=98 94.6% (88.6-98.0) 95.5% (89.7-98.5) 86.7% (78.4-92.7) 86.7% (78.4-92.7) 2.7% (NA) 3.1% (NA)
(23) Randomized, single-blind, single-center, parallel-group comparison VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=72 RPZ 20 mg or LPZ 30 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=69 95.8% (88.3-99.1) 95.7% (88.0-99.1) 69.6% (57.3-80.1) 71.4% (58.7-82.1) 26.3% (NA) 37.7% (NA)
(28) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=125 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=295 89.6% (84-95) 89.6% (84-95) 71.9% (67-77) 73.1% (68-78) 11.9% (0%) 10.7% (5 dropouts)
(21) Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group comparison VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=329 LPZ 30 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=321 92.6% (89.2-95.2) NA 75.9% (70.9-80.5) NA 34.0% (0.9%) 41.4% (0.6%)
(38) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=308 LPZ 30 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=272 NA 91.0% NA 84.7% NA (2 dropouts) NA (2 dropouts)
(29) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=353 LPZ 30 mg or RPZ 10 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=2,173 62.3% 89.4% 47.1% 66.8% 8.4% (NA) 5.7% (NA)
(30) Prospective and retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=146 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, OPZ 20 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=1,305 NA 89.7% (87.9-91.3) NA 73.9% (66.0-80.8) NA NA
(31) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=546 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=211 (LPZ), 89 (RPZ), 507 (EPZ) 87.9% (84.9-90.5) NA LPZ 57.3% (50.4-64.1), RPZ 62.9% (52.0-72.9), EPZ 71.6% (67.5-75.5) NA 11.2% (0%) LPZ 5.7%, RPZ 10.1%, EPZ 7.7% (0%)
(32) Retrospective, multicenter VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=422 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, OPZ 20 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=2,293 87.2% NA 72.4% NA 6.2% (NA) 6.2% (NA)
(33) Retrospective, two-institution VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=117 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=198 (LPZ), 138 (RPZ), 120 (EPZ) 83% (75-89) 85% (77-91) LPZ 66% (59-72), RPZ 67% (58-74), EPZ 83% (75-89) LPZ 69% (62-76), RPZ 70% (61-77), EPZ 87% (79-93) 5% (NA) LPZ 11%, RPZ 6%, EPZ 3% (NA)
(22) Non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group comparison VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=623 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, OPZ 20 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=608 84.9% (81.9-87.6) 86.4% (83.5-89.1) 78.8% (75.3-82.0) 79.4% (76.0-82.6) NA NA
(25) Randomized, open-label, multicenter VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=55 [CAM-susceptible H. pylori] LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=42 (LPZ), 4 (RPZ), 5 (EPZ) [CAM-susceptible H. pylori] 87.3% (75.5-94.7) 88.9% (77.4-95.8) 76.5% (62.5-87.2) 86.7% (73.2-94.9) NA (0%) NA (1 dropout)
VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=41 [CAM-resistant H. pylori] 82.9% (67.9-92.8) 82.9% (67.9-92.8)
(34) Retrospective, single-center, propensity score matching analysis VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=181 LPZ 30 mg or RPZ 10 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=480 89.0% (84.4-93.5) [89.1% (84.5-93.8) in propensity score matching] 91.5% (87.3-95.6) [91.2% (87.0-95.5)] 74.2% (70.3-78.1) [70.9% (64.1-77.6)] 77.9% (74.1-81.7) [71.7% (64.9-78.4)] 12.7% (0%) 14.4% (0%)
(37) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=363 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 or 400 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=207 (LPZ), 450 (RPZ), 123 (EPZ) 91.5% (88.6-94.3) 97.4% (95.7-99.1) LPZ 77.3% (71.6-83.0), RPZ 79.8% (76.1-83.5), EPZ 81.3% (74.4-88.2) LPZ 85.6% (80.5-90.6), RPZ 86.1% (82.8-89.4), EPZ 88.5% (82.6-94.4) NA NA
(35) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=443 EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=431 84.6% 86.3% 79.1% 79.9% 0.68% (1 dropout) 1.17% (3 dropouts)
(36) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=335 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + CAM 200 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=1,720 85.7% 90.3% 73.2% 76.4% NA (0%) NA (0.4%)
Open in a new tab

PPI: proton pump inhibitor, CI: confidence interval, ITT: intention to treat analysis, FAS: full analysis set, PP: per protocol analysis, VPZ: vonoprazan, AMX: amoxicillin, CAM: clarithromycin, LPZ: lansoprazole, RPZ: rabeprazole, OPZ: omeprazole, EPZ: esomeprazole, NA: not available

Vonoprazan is available mainly in Japan, and the H. pylori eradication regimens accepted in Japan are 7-day triple therapies: PPI or vonoprazan + amoxicillin + clarithromycin (PPI-AC or VAC) as first-line therapy and PPI or vonoprazan + amoxicillin + metronidazole (PPI-AM or VAM) as second-line therapy (12, 39). Thus, the results of all of the assessed studies pertain to these triple therapies.

1) Efficacy of vonoprazan for first-line eradication

Murakami et al. compared the H. pylori eradication rate of vonoprazan with that of PPIs for patients with gastroduodenal ulcers in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group comparative study (21). The eradication rates of the VAC group (vonoprazan 20 mg in combination with amoxicillin 750 mg plus clarithromycin 200 mg or 400 mg, twice daily for 7 days) and the lansoprazole group (lansoprazole 30 mg in combination with amoxicillin 750 mg plus clarithromycin 200 mg or 400 mg, twice daily for 7 days) were 92.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 89.2-95.2%] and 75.9% (95% CI, 70.9-80.5%) in the full analysis set, respectively, with the difference between the 2 groups being 16.7% (95% CI, 11.2-22.1%). This result demonstrated the non-inferiority of VAC to lansoprazole regarding the therapeutic effect on H. pylori eradication. Almost all studies reported that the eradication rate with vonoprazan was higher than that with PPIs (21-23, 27-32, 34-38), although Shinozaki et al. reported that no significant differences were shown compared with esomeprazole (33).

There have been two systematic reviews and one meta-analysis study of H. pylori eradication with vonoprazan (40-42). Jung et al. performed a systematic review with 10,644 patients in 10 studies (40). The H. pylori eradication rate according to an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was 88.1% (95% CI, 86.1-89.9%) in the vonoprazan-based triple therapy group and 72.8% (95% CI, 71.0-75.4%) in the PPI based-triple therapy group, and the H. pylori eradication rate with vonoprazan was superior to that with PPI [pooled risk ratio (95% CI) =1.19 (1.15-1.24)]. Dong et al. performed a meta-analysis including 14 studies with 14,636 patients. The odds ratio of the eradication rate with vonoprazan to that with PPIs was 2.44 (95% CI, 1.99-2.99) (41). However, these review articles by Dong et al., Jung et al., and Li et al. included retrospective observational studies. To show the superiority of PCAB in H. pylori eradication, further randomized control trials and meta-analyses (based on randomized controlled trials) are needed.

The remarkable effect of the VAC regimen for the eradication of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori has been reported. In the randomized controlled trial by Murakami et al., the eradication rate of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori was 40.0% with lansoprazole and 82.0% with vonoprazan (21). The subgroup analysis of the systematic review by Jung et al. showed the pooled risk ratio of the eradication rate of vonoprazan for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori to that of PPI to be 1.94 (95% CI, 1.63-2.31) (40), and the meta-analysis by Dong et al. reported that the odds ratio was 5.92 (95% CI, 3.70-9.49) (41). The retrospective studies showed a comparable result (28, 30). Sue et al. reported that no significant difference was observed between the VAC and PPI-AC regimens in treatment of clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori (43). Li et al. showed through their meta-analysis that vonoprazan- and conventional PPI-based therapies are similarly effective for the eradication of clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori strains. The superiority of VAC to PPI-AC was emphasized against clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori (42).

A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the prospective study by Murakami et al. showed that the difference in clarithromycin dose (200 mg or 400 mg) had no significant effect on the eradication rate (21). This result is the same as that of a previous Japanese study of a PPI (44). Although vonoprazan increases the blood concentration of clarithromycin (45) and stabilizes clarithromycin in gastric juice by suppressing gastric acid secretion (46), an increase in only the clarithromycin dose does not have a positive impact on H. pylori eradication.

Vonoprazan has been shown not to have anti-H. pylori activity in vitro (47). The main mechanism of the high eradication rate of vonoprazan is its strong inhibition of gastric acid secretion. Protein-targeted antibiotics, such as amoxicillin and clarithromycin, effectively work in the bacterial growth phase. H. pylori grows between pH 6.0 and 8.0 in the same band of pH values, providing increased sensitivity for these antibiotics (48-50). As described above, vonoprazan can produce a more rapid, profound, and sustained suppression of gastric acid secretion than PPIs and can elevate the intragastric pH (19, 20). These features of vonoprazan help enhance the sensitivity of antibiotics and thus promote the high eradication rate.

PPIs are influenced by the CYP2C19 polymorphism. The intragastric pH during eradication with PPIs in extensive metabolizers of CYP2C19 is lower than in poor metabolizers, resulting in a decrease in the rate of H. pylori eradication (17, 51, 52). Because vonoprazan is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4/5 (53), it can strongly inhibit gastric acid in all patients without this individual variability, thus further contributing to its overall high eradication rate.

Adverse events of eradication therapy with vonoprazan were also investigated by a systematic review and a meta-analysis study. Jung et al. reported adverse event rates of 8.1% for vonoprazan-based triple therapy (95% CI, 3.8-16.3%) and 8.2% for PPI-based triple therapy (95% CI, 3.6-17.4%), and the difference between the two groups was not significant [pooled risk ratio of vonoprazan-based therapy (95% CI) =1.02 (0.78-1.34)] (40). Dong et al. reported that the vonoprazan group had a lower occurrence of adverse events than the PPI group in their randomized control trial subgroup analysis [odds ratio of vonoprazan-based therapy (95% CI) =0.70 (0.54-0.91)], but when adding the non-randomized control trials into the overall analysis, there was no significant difference between the vonoprazan and PPI groups [odds ratio (95% CI) =1.04 (0.77-1.42)] (41). In two randomized control trials and one propensity score-matched analysis (21, 23, 34), the vonoprazan group had a lower incidence of adverse events than the PPI group. However, the incidence of adverse events in the vonoprazan group was higher than that in the PPI group in three of the non-randomized control trials (28, 29, 31).

These results imply that the safety of H. pylori eradication therapy with vonoprazan is comparable to that of PPI-based triple therapy.

2) Efficacy of vonoprazan for second-line eradication

The second-line eradication regimen in Japan is vonoprazan or PPI + amoxicillin + metronidazole (VAM or PPI-AM). We summarized the results of second-line eradication therapy in Table 2. Sue et al. compared the VAM regimen (vonoprazan 20 mg + amoxicillin 750 mg + metronidazole 250 mg, twice a day for 7 days) with the PPI-AM regimen (lansoprazole 30 mg, rabeprazole 10 mg, or esomeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 750 mg + metronidazole 250 mg, twice a day for 7 days) in a prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial (22). The eradication rates with VAM in the ITT analysis and per protocol (PP) analysis were 80.5% (95% CI, 74.6-85.6%) and 82.4% (95% CI, 76.6-87.3%), respectively, and those with PPI-AM were 81.5% (95% CI, 74.2-87.4%) and 82.1% (95% CI, 74.8-87.9%), respectively, with no significant difference noted. The other four retrospective studies showed no significant difference between the eradication rate with vonoprazan and that with PPIs (29, 31, 35, 36). Unlike amoxicillin and clarithromycin (49), metronidazole is a DNA-targeted antibiotic, and its effect does not depend on the cell division of bacteria. Therefore, eradication regimens containing metronidazole do not benefit from the strong suppression of gastric acid secretion by vonoprazan.

Table 2.

Comparative Studies of H. Pylori Second-line Eradication Therapy with Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors.

References Study design Triple therapy regimen Eradication rate (95% CI) Adverse events (discontinuation)
Vonoprazan PPI Vonoprazan PPI
ITT/FAS PP ITT/FAS PP Vonoprazan PPI
(29) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=85 LPZ 30 mg or RPZ 10 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=650 71.8% 96.8% 73.7% 90.5% 6% (NA) 3.3% (NA)
(31) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=76 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=57 (LPZ), 24 (RPZ), 104 (EPZ) 96.1% (88.9-99.2) NA LPZ 89.5% (78.5-96.0), RPZ 95.8% (78.5-99.9), EPZ 88.5% (80.7-93.9) NA 7.9% (0%) LPZ 12.3%, RPZ 12.5%, EPZ 13.5% (0%)
(22) Non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group comparison VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=216 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, OPZ 20 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=146 80.5% (74.6-85.6) 82.4% (76.6-87.3) 81.5% (74.2-87.4) 82.1% (74.8-87.9) NA NA
(35) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=46 EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=54 89.1% 91.1% 83.3% 88.2% NA NA
(36) Retrospective, single-center VPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=66 LPZ 30 mg, RPZ 10 mg, or EPZ 20 mg + AMX 750 mg + MNZ 250 mg, twice-daily, 7 days, n=386 89.4% 96.7% 89.9% 92.8% NA (0%) NA (0.5%)
Open in a new tab

PPI: proton pump inhibitor, CI: confidence interval, ITT: intention to treat analysis, FAS: full analysis set, PP: per protocol analysis, VPZ: vonoprazan, AMX: amoxicillin, MNZ: metronidazole, LPZ: lansoprazole, RPZ: rabeprazole, OPZ: omeprazole, EPZ: esomeprazole, NA: not available

There are a few studies concerning the adverse events of second-line eradication therapy with vonoprazan (21, 24, 29, 31, 36). These studies showed that adverse events occurred in 0-30% of patients receiving VAM-containing regimens, with diarrhea being the main adverse effect.

3) Efficacy of vonoprazan for third-line eradication

Sue et al. also performed a prospective, randomized trial of the efficacy of vonoprazan-based and PPI-based 7-day triple regimens with amoxicillin and sitafloxacin as a third-line therapy for eradicating H. pylori after failure of clarithromycin-based and metronidazole-based therapies (26). Their regimen contained vonoprazan 20 mg or PPI + amoxicillin 750 mg + sitafloxacin 100 mg, twice a day for 7 days (VAS or PPI-AS). The ITT and PP eradication rates of the vonoprazan group were 75.8% (95% CI, 57.7-88.9%) and 83.3% (95% CI, 65.3-94.4%), respectively, and those of the PPI group were 53.3% (95% CI, 34.3-71.7%) and 57.1% (95% CI, 37.2-75.5%), respectively. In the PP analyses, the eradication rate of the VAS group was significantly higher than that of the PPI-AS group (p=0.043). However, no significant differences were detected in the ITT analyses (p=0.071). In Japan, third-line therapy is not covered under the Japanese national health insurance system, so we do not have enough information for a thorough review.

Can Vonoprazan-based Triple Therapy Be Applied to Other Populations and Regions?

Vonoprazan is currently available mainly in Japan, and there have been no large-scale studies of vonoprazan in other countries. Differences in populations and regions may lead to different results from those of Japanese studies.

The first concern is whether the inhibition of gastric acid is as strong in other populations as in Japanese. In two Phase I clinical trials including healthy subjects in Japan and the UK, the intragastric pH >4 or 5 holding time ratio of the UK population tended to be lower than that of the Japanese population (19, 20). If the suppression of gastric acid by vonoprazan affects the eradication rate, then the rate in the UK population may be lower than that in the Japanese population. Vonoprazan is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4/5 (53). Sugimoto et al. reported that the CYP3A4/5 genotype status might affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vonoprazan and thereby affect the H. pylori eradication rate (54). The CYP3A4/5 genotype may cause individual variability regarding the effect of vonoprazan.

Second, we must consider the various patterns of antibiotic resistance of H. pylori among regions. The Japanese studies described above investigated roughly the same eradication regimens: vonoprazan 20 mg + amoxicillin 750 mg + clarithromycin 200/400 mg or metronidazole 250 mg, twice a day for 7 days (21-38). In Japan, the rate of clarithromycin resistance of H. pylori is more than 30%, whereas that of metronidazole resistance is less than 5% (55). The Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report recommended that clarithromycin-containing triple therapy as first-line therapy be abandoned when the clarithromycin resistance rate in the region exceeded 15%, with PPI-amoxicillin-metronidazole triple therapy, concomitant treatment, or bismuth-containing quadruple therapy recommended instead (13). The review article by Graham and Fischbach showed that 4-drug treatment (i.e. concomitant therapy or sequential therapy, etc.) achieved an eradication rate of more than 90%, even in a region with high clarithromycin resistance (56). The studies of quadruple therapy in Japan showed high eradication rates, but the number of cases was relatively small, and the evidence level was low (57-63).

In Japan, H. pylori eradication therapies have been approved for patients with H. pylori-related chronic gastritis under the Japanese national health insurance system since 2013 (64), resulting in increasing cases of H. pylori eradication. Due to the fact that H. pylori eradication for gastric cancer prevention is epochal, it is therefore necessary to develop more efficient eradication methods. Eradication regimens that use more kinds of drugs (quadruple therapy), higher doses of drugs, and longer treatment durations (10-14 days) have been recommended (13, 56, 65). The use of vonoprazan for concomitant therapy and sequential therapy might further improve the eradication rate. Developing optimal regimens with vonoprazan will be an important issue in the future.

Conclusion

We reviewed H. pylori eradication therapies with vonoprazan in Japan. First-line triple therapy with vonoprazan has a higher rate of eradication than that with PPI. The effect of vonoprazan on gastric acid secretion is outstanding. Vonoprazan should be administered as an assisting agent in H. pylori eradication therapy, regardless of the number of treatments performed. However, multiple studies of various populations and regions will be needed to develop optimal regimens of treatment with vonoprazan that can be applied globally.

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

References

  • 1. Warren JR, Marshall B. Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancet 1: 1273-1275, 1983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Marshall BJ, Armstrong JA, McGechie DB, Glancy RJ. Attempt to fulfil Koch's postulates for pyloric Campylobacter. Med J Aust 142: 436-439, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Morris A, Nicholson G. Ingestion of Campylobacter pyloridis causes gastritis and raised fasting gastric pH. Am J Gastroenterol 82: 192-199, 1987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Asaka M, Kato M, Kudo M, et al. . Atrophic changes of gastric mucosa are caused by Helicobacter pylori infection rather than aging: studies in asymptomatic Japanese adults. Helicobacter 1: 52-56, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rokkas T, Pistiolas D, Sechopoulos P, Robotis I, Margantinis G. The long-term impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastric histology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter 12 (Suppl 2): 32-38, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ford AC, Gurusamy KS, Delaney B, Forman D, Moayyedi P. Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori-positive people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD003840, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nakamura S, Sugiyama T, Matsumoto T, et al. . Long-term clinical outcome of gastric MALT lymphoma after eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre cohort follow-up study of 420 patients in Japan. Gut 61: 507-513, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ford AC, Forman D, Hunt RH, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy to prevent gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic infected individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 348: g3174, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fukase K, Kato M, Kikuchi S, et al. . Effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 372: 392-397, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yoon SB, Park JM, Lim CH, Cho YK, Choi MG. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors: a meta-analysis. Helicobacter 19: 243-248, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Satake M, Nishikawa J, Fukagawa Y, et al. . The long-term efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22: 2233-2237, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Asaka M, Kato M, Takahashi S, et al. . Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2009 revised edition. Helicobacter 15: 1-20, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain CA, et al. . Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut 66: 6-30, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Smith SM, O'Morain C, McNamara D. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori in times of increasing antibiotic resistance. World J Gastroenterol 20: 9912-9921, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hori Y, Imanishi A, Matsukawa J, et al. . 1-[5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine monofumarate (TAK-438), a novel and potent potassium-competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid-related diseases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 335: 231-238, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Scott DR, Munson KB, Marcus EA, Lambrecht NW, Sachs G. The binding selectivity of vonoprazan (TAK-438) to the gastric H+, K+ -ATPase. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 42: 1315-1326, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Furuta T, Shirai N, Sugimoto M, Nakamura A, Hishida A, Ishizaki T. Influence of CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic polymorphism on proton pump inhibitor-based therapies. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 20: 153-167, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Chong E, Ensom MH. Pharmacogenetics of the proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review. Pharmacotherapy 23: 460-471, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sakurai Y, Nishimura A, Kennedy G, et al. . Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single rising TAK-438 (vonoprazan) doses in healthy male Japanese/non-Japanese subjects. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 6: e94, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Jenkins H, Sakurai Y, Nishimura A, et al. . Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of repeated doses of TAK-438 (vonoprazan), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 41: 636-648, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Murakami K, Sakurai Y, Shiino M, Funao N, Nishimura A, Asaka M. Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, as a component of first-line and second-line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a phase III, randomised, double-blind study. Gut 65: 1439-1446, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sue S, Kuwashima H, Iwata Y, et al. . The superiority of vonoprazan-based first-line triple therapy with clarithromycin: a prospective multi-center cohort study on Helicobacter pylori eradication. Intern Med 56: 1277-1285, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Maruyama M, Tanaka N, Kubota D, et al. . Vonoprazan-based regimen is more useful than PPI-based one as a first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017: 4385161, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ozaki H, Harada S, Takeuchi T, et al. . Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, should be used for the Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy as first choice: a large sample study of vonoprazan in real world compared with our randomized control trial using second-generation proton pump inhibitors for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Digestion 97: 212-218, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sue S, Ogushi M, Arima I, et al. . Vonoprazan- vs proton-pump inhibitor-based first-line 7-day triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Helicobacter 23: e12456, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sue S, Shibata W, Sasaki T, et al. . Randomized trial of vonoprazan-based versus proton-pump inhibitor-based third-line triple therapy with sitafloxacin for Helicobacter pylori. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018(Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kajihara Y, Shimoyama T, Mizuki I. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of using vonoprazan-amoxicillin-clarithromycin triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication. Scand J Gastroenterol 52: 238-241, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Matsumoto H, Shiotani A, Katsumata R, et al. . Helicobacter pylori eradication with proton pump inhibitors or potassium-competitive acid blockers: the effect of clarithromycin resistance. Dig Dis Sci 61: 3215-3220, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Fujimoto A, et al. . Effects of patient age and choice of antisecretory agent on success of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Biochem Nutr 60: 208-210, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Noda H, Noguchi S, Yoshimine T, et al. . A novel potassium-competitive acid blocker improves the efficacy of clarithromycin-containing 7-day triple therapy against Helicobacter pylori. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 25: 283-288, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sakurai K, Suda H, Ido Y, et al. . Comparative study: vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. World J Gastroenterol 23: 668-675, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shichijo S, Hirata Y, Niikura R, et al. . Vonoprazan versus conventional proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy as first-line treatment against Helicobacter pylori: a multicenter retrospective study in clinical practice. J Dig Dis 17: 670-675, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Shinozaki S, Nomoto H, Kondo Y, et al. . Comparison of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32: 255-260, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Suzuki S, Gotoda T, Kusano C, Iwatsuka K, Moriyama M. The efficacy and tolerability of a triple therapy containing a potassium-competitive acid blocker compared with a 7-day ppi-based low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 111: 949-956, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tsujimae M, Yamashita H, Hashimura H, et al. . A comparative study of a new class of gastric acid suppressant agent named vonoparazan versus esomeprazole for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Digestion 94: 240-246, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yamada S, Kawakami T, Nakatsugawa Y, et al. . Usefulness of vonoprazan, a potassium ion-competitive acid blocker, for primary eradication of Helicobacter pylori. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 7: 550-555, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tanabe H, Yoshino K, Ando K, et al. . Vonoprazan-based triple therapy is non-inferior to susceptibility-guided proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 17: 29, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mori N, Nishiura Y, Suga D, et al. . Second-line triple therapy in failures with vonoprazan-based triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Biomed Rep 9: 169-174, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Lee SY. Current progress toward eradicating Helicobacter pylori in East Asian countries: differences in the 2013 revised guidelines between China, Japan, and South Korea. World J Gastroenterol 20: 1493-1502, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Jung YS, Kim EH, Park CH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of vonoprazan-based triple therapy on Helicobacter pylori eradication. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 46: 106-114, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dong SQ, Singh TP, Wei X, Yao H, Wang HL. Review: a Japanese population-based meta-analysis of vonoprazan versus PPI for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: is superiority an illusion? Helicobacter 2017(Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Li M, Oshima T, Horikawa T, et al. . Systematic review with meta-analysis: vonoprazan, a potent acid blocker, is superior to proton-pump inhibitors for eradication of clarithromycin-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter 23: e12495, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sue S, Ogushi M, Arima I, et al. . Vonoprazan- vs proton-pump inhibitor-based first-line 7-day triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Helicobacter 23: e12456, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Asaka M, Sugiyama T, Kato M, et al. . A multicenter, double-blind study on triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Japanese peptic ulcer patients. Helicobacter 6: 254-261, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sakurai Y, Shiino M, Okamoto H, Nishimura A, Nakamura K, Hasegawa S. Pharmacokinetics and safety of triple therapy with vonoprazan, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin or metronidazole: a phase 1, open-label, randomized, crossover study. Adv Ther 33: 1519-1535, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Erah PO, Goddard AF, Barrett DA, Shaw PN, Spiller RC. The stability of amoxycillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole in gastric juice: relevance to the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 39: 5-12, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. TakecabⓇ 10mg/20mg Interview Form [Internet]. [cited 2018 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www.takedamed.com/mcm/medicine/download.jsp?id=162&type=INTERVIEW_FORM (in Japanese)
  • 48. Sachs G, Meyer-Rosberg K, Scott DR, Melchers K. Acid, protons and Helicobacter pylori. Yale J Biol Med 69: 301-316, 1996. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Scott D, Weeks D, Melchers K, Sachs G. The life and death of Helicobacter pylori. Gut 43 (Suppl 1): S56-S60, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sachs G, Scott DR, Wen Y. Gastric infection by Helicobacter pylori. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13: 540-546, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Furuta T, Shirai N, Takashima M, et al. . Effect of genotypic differences in CYP2C19 on cure rates for Helicobacter pylori infection by triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69: 158-168, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Sugimoto M, Furuta T, Shirai N, et al. . Evidence that the degree and duration of acid suppression are related to Helicobacter pylori eradication by triple therapy. Helicobacter 12: 317-323, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Yamasaki H, Kawaguchi N, Nonaka M, et al. . In vitro metabolism of TAK-438, vonoprazan fumarate, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker. Xenobiotica 47: 1027-1034, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Sugimoto M, Ban H, Hira D, et al. . Letter: CYP3A4/5 genotype status and outcome of vonoprazan-containing Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Japan. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 45: 1009-1010, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Okamura T, Suga T, Nagaya T, et al. . Antimicrobial resistance and characteristics of eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori in Japan: a multi-generational comparison. Helicobacter 19: 214-220, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Graham DY, Fischbach L. Helicobacter pylori treatment in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance. Gut 59: 1143-1153, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Yanai A, Sakamoto K, Akanuma M, Ogura K, Maeda S. Non-bismuth quadruple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized study in Japan. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 3: 1-6, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Okada M, Nishimura H, Kawashima M, et al. . A new quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: influence of resistant strains on treatment outcome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13: 769-774, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Okada M, Oki K, Shirotani T, et al. . A new quadruple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Effect of pretreatment with omeprazole on the cure rate. J Gastroenterol 33: 640-645, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Koizumi W, Tanabe S, Nakatani K, et al. . Quadruple therapy with ecabet sodium, omeprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole is effective for eradication of Helicobacter pylori after failure of first-line therapy (KDOG0201 Study). J Clin Pharm Ther 35: 303-307, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Nagahara A, Miwa H, Ogawa K, et al. . Addition of metronidazole to rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection provides an excellent cure rate with five-day therapy. Helicobacter 5: 88-93, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Nagahara A, Miwa H, Yamada T, Kurosawa A, Ohkura R, Sato N. Five-day proton pump inhibitor-based quadruple therapy regimen is more effective than 7-day triple therapy regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15: 417-421, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Ueki N, Miyake K, Kusunoki M, et al. . Impact of quadruple regimen of clarithromycin added to metronidazole-containing triple therapy against Helicobacter pylori infection following clarithromycin-containing triple-therapy failure. Helicobacter 14: 91-99, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Asaka M. A new approach for elimination of gastric cancer deaths in Japan. Int J Cancer 132: 1272-1276, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Yuan Y, Ford AC, Khan KJ, et al. . Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Internal Medicine

RESOURCES