Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 11.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2019 Dec 20;38(7):1746–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.028

Erythema multiforme, Stevens Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis reported after vaccination, 1999–2017

John R Su a,*, Penina Haber a, Carmen S Ng a,1, Paige L Marquez a, Graça M Dores b, Silvia Perez-Vilar b,2, Maria V Cano a
PMCID: PMC7008074  NIHMSID: NIHMS1065887  PMID: 31870573

Abstract

Background:

Since the last review of vaccine safety surveillance data for erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS), SJS/TEN, and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) (EM/SJS/TEN), over 37 new vaccines have been introduced in the United States. We sought to describe reported EM/SJS/TEN after vaccines during 1999–2017.

Methods:

We identified U.S. reports of EM/SJS/TEN received by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during 1999–2017. We stratified analysis by condition (EM, SJS, or TEN), and analyzed reports by serious or non-serious status, sex, age group, time from vaccination to symptom onset, exposure to known causes of EM/SJS/TEN, and vaccines administered. We used Empirical Bayesian data mining to detect vaccine-AE pairs reported more frequently than expected.

Results:

Of 466,027 reports to VAERS during 1999–2017, we identified 984 reports of EM, 89 reports of SJS, 6 reports of SJS/TEN, and 7 reports of TEN. Few reports of EM (9%), and most reports of SJS (52%), SJS/TEN (100%), and TEN (100%) were serious. Overall, 55% of reports described males, 48% described children aged < 4 years; 58% of EM/SJS/TEN occurred ≤ 7 days after vaccination. Few reports (≤5%) described exposure to known causes of EM/SJS/TEN. Overall, childhood vaccines (e.g., combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine) were most commonly reported. We identified 6 deaths; 4 were exposed to medications associated with EM/SJS/TEN. EM after smallpox vaccine was reported disproportionately among people aged 19–49 years.

Conclusions:

EM/SJS/TEN were rarely reported after vaccination; data mining identified a known association between EM and smallpox vaccine.

Keywords: Erythema multiforme, Stevens Johnson syndrome, Toxic epidermal necrolysis, Vaccine, VAERS, Vaccine safety, Surveillance, Data mining

1. Introduction

Dermatologic adverse events (AEs) are among the most frequently reported AEs after vaccination. The most common dermatologic AEs are redness, swelling, and tenderness at the injection site [1], which can occur in up to 90% of persons receiving vaccinations [2]. At the other extreme are AEs, such as Henoch-Schönlein purpura after the combined measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, for which only isolated case reports exist [3]. While some dermatologic AEs can be common to many vaccines (such as tenderness at the injection site), other dermatologic AEs can be specific to a particular vaccine, such as vesicular lesions after varicella vaccine.

Some dermatologic AEs that have been reported to occur after vaccination involve hypersensitivity reactions, such as an allergy to the aluminum in some adjuvanted vaccines [4], or lichen planus after hepatitis B vaccine [5]. Erythema multiforme (EM) is a hypersensitivity reaction characterized by papules, classically with a ringed, target-like appearance often involving the palms of the hands and soles of the feet [1]. More severe hypersensitivity reactions include Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), both of which involve blistering and sloughing of skin. [6] SJS and TEN also typically involve lesions on mucosal surfaces. SJS and TEN are thought to be related conditions of varying severity, depending upon percentage of body surface area involved: <10% for SJS, 10–30% for combined SJS/TEN, and >30% of body surface area for TEN [7]. Fortunately, EM, SJS, and TEN are rare, occurring with a rate of 4.2 hospitalizations per million person-years after exposure to an associated medication [8]; rates after vaccinations, as of this writing, are unavailable.

Ball et al previously identified 99 reports of SJS, TEN, and serious reports of EM after vaccination received by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during July 1990 through September 1999 [9]. Since 1999, over 37 vaccines have been approved for use in the United States [10]. Thus, we searched and described reports of EM, SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN after vaccination (these specific dermatologic AEs will be referred to collectively as EM/SJS/TEN) reported to VAERS during 1999–2017, and compared the relative frequency of EM/SJS/TEN reported to VAERS by vaccine, to better understand if there are any concerning patterns of reported EM/SJS/TEN (e.g., after a specific vaccine, or among a particular age group) or other emerging safety concerns.

2. Methods

2.1. Data source

AEs occurring after vaccination can be reported to VAERS, a national spontaneous reporting system established in 1990 to monitor AEs that is jointly administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration [11,12]. VAERS receives reports from healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, vaccine recipients, and other persons. Reported symptoms and diagnoses are coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Terms (PTs) [13]. MedDRA PTs are not necessarily medically confirmed diagnoses, and multiple MedDRA PTs can be assigned to a VAERS report. Federal regulations define a serious report as a report in which one or more of the following conditions is reported: death, life-threatening illness, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, permanent disability, congenital anomaly, or birth defect [14]. A report might therefore not be classified as serious, despite describing a clinically severe presentation. VAERS personnel routinely request medical records for non-manufacturer serious reports. Vaccine manufacturers that directly receive reports of AEs typically request and review medical records per regulatory processes [12]; these records are not always available to manufacturers. Serious reports from vaccine manufacturers therefore often do not contain medical records that VAERS personnel can review.

2.2. Descriptive analysis

We searched the VAERS database for U.S. reports of EM/SJS/TEN following vaccination received by VAERS during October 1, 1999, through December 31, 2017 (among reports received by CDC and FDA through April 27, 2018); reports specifying a vaccination date outside the analytic period were excluded. We searched for reports that included the PTs “erythema multiforme,” “Stevens Johnson Syndrome,” and “toxic epidermal necrolysis.” We also searched text fields for the following terms: “skin ulcer,” “blister,” “blister, infected,” and/or “blister, rupture,” where “multiforme,” “John son,” and/or “necrolysis” was also present. We combined results from both searches, then deduplicated records.

We reviewed the resulting reports for reports of EM/SJS/TEN that were diagnosed by physicians (reported by a physician, or a physician’s diagnosis was documented in available medical records). For reports of symptoms consistent with EM/SJS/TEN, but without a physician’s diagnosis, we defined (1) EM as papular lesions, classically with a ringed (“targetoid”) appearance, usually beginning peripherally and then spreading to the torso, that could involve the palms of the hands and/or soles of the feet, without mucosal lesions; (2) SJS as peeling or blistering of the skin with lesions on mucosal membranes that involved <10% of total body surface area (BSA); (3) SJS/TEN as signs and symptoms consistent with SJS, but involving between 10 and 30% BSA; and (4) TEN as signs and symptoms consistent with SJS, involving >30% BSA.

We stratified data by condition (EM, SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN). For each condition, we analyzed reports by sex; age group (<4 years, 4–10 years, 11–18 years, 19–49 years, ≥50 years, and age not reported), roughly corresponding with the recommended schedules for vaccination [15]; seriousness of report (serious or non-serious); and time from vaccination to onset of symptoms. Reports were further analyzed for persons with exposure to a known trigger [8,10] proximal to onset of symptoms (viral or Mycoplasma infection, medications (anticonvulsants, sulfa drugs, penicillins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), macrolide antibiotics, and acetaminophen); history of predisposing conditions (past history of EM/SJS/TEN, atopic dermatitis, asthma/reactive airway disorder, allergies to medications, or malignancy) [16]; and whether vaccines were given alone or concomitantly with other vaccines.

2.3. Estimated reporting rates

Estimating reporting rates of AEs after vaccination using data from VAERS is challenging because data about doses of vaccine that were distributed or administered are difficult to obtain. However, we were able to estimate crude reporting rates of EM, SJS, SJS/ TEN, and TEN after varicella vaccine using reports received during 2006 through 2016 as the numerator, divided by doses distributed by the manufacturer [17] during the corresponding time period (Merck and Company, Inc., personal communication) as the denominator; rates were estimated as reports per 1 million doses distributed. For influenza vaccine (all types), annual crude reporting rates for EM, SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN were estimated during 2010 through 2017 using reports received as the numerator, with population estimates and vaccine coverage for that year multiplied as the denominator [18,19]; rates for 2 age groups (1–17 years, ≥18 years) were estimated. From these annual crude reporting rates, median rates of reports per million doses administered were estimated for 2010–2017.

2.4. Data mining (disproportionate reporting)

We used Empirical Bayesian data mining to assess whether vaccine-AE combinations were reported more frequently than expected (when compared to all other vaccine-AE combinations in the VAERS database) using the Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) algorithm [20]. We analyzed U.S. reports received by VAERS during October 1, 1999 – December 31, 2017 (received as of April 27, 2018). We stratified by age group (<4, 4–10, 11–18, 19–49, ≥50 years, and unreported), and adjusted for sex, and year in which the report was received by VAERS. We analyzed disproportionate reporting for vaccine-EM/SJS/TEN combinations using: (1) the PTs “erythema multiforme,” “Stevens Johnson Syndrome,” and “toxic epidermal necrolysis”; and (2) PTs included in reports with the words “skin ulcer,” “blister,” “blister infected,” or “blister rupture” in the narrative, symptoms text, or comments fields, if the words “multiforme”, “Johnson”, and/or “necrolysis” were also present. We conducted our analyses for all reports, and serious reports only, in Oracle’s Empirica™ Signal System [20,21]. The main statistical scores computed were the Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) and its associated 90% confidence interval (EB05, EB95). We used the lower 5% bound of the 90% confidence interval for an EBGM (EB05) of ≥2.0 as the threshold to define vaccine-AE combinations reported at least twice as often as expected, indicating combinations of potential significance [21].

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive analysis

Of 466,027 reports to VAERS during the analytic period [22], we identified 1086 (0.2%) reports of EM/SJS/TEN. Overall, over half (51%) of reported EM occurred among children aged <4 years (Table 1), with a median age of 3 years (range: <1 year to 89 years); among reports of SJS, overall median age was 15 years (range: <1 year to 84 years). Most (91%) reports of EM were non-serious, while most (52%) reports of SJS, and all reports of SJS/TEN and TEN, were serious. Most reports of EM/SJS/TEN described onset of symptoms within 14 days of vaccination; for cases of SJS with known time to onset, 71% described onset of symptoms within 3 days of vaccination.

Table 1.

Description of U.S. reports of Erythema Multiforme (EM), Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN to VAERS, 1999–2017.

EM, n = 984 SJS, n = 89 SJS/TEN, n = 6 TEN, n = 7 Total, N = 1086
Sex, no. (%)
Male 550 (56) 37 (42) 1 (17) 5 (71) 593 (55)
Female 413 (42) 49 (55) 5 (83) 2 (29) 469 (43)
Not reported 21 (2) 3 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 24 (2)
Seriousness, no. (%)
Death 1 (<1) 0 (0) 1 (17) 4 (57) 6 (1)
Serious, non-death 88 (9) 46 (52) 5 (83) 3 (43) 142 (13)
Non-serious 895 (91) 43 (48) 0 (0) 0 (0) 938 (86)
Age, no. (%)
<4 years 502 (51) 17 (19) 1 (17) 2 (29) 522 (48)
4–10 years 111 (11) 9 (10) 3 (50) 1 (14) 124 (11)
11–18 years 60 (6) 18 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) 78 (7)
19–49 years 162 (16) 18 (20) 2 (33) 2 (29) 184 (17)
50+ years 126 (13) 20 (22) 0 (0) 2 (29) 148 (14)
Not reported 23 (2) 7 (8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 30 (3)
Time from vaccination to onset of symptoms, no. (%)
<1 day 113 (11) 20 (22) 0 (0) 0 (0) 133 (12)
1–3 days 326 (33) 31 (35) 1 (17) 3 (43) 361 (33)
4–6 days 134 (14) 5 (6) 2 (33) 2 (29) 143 (13)
7–14 days 262 (26) 12 (13) 0 (0) 1 (14) 275 (25)
15–30 days 52 (5) 3 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 55 (5)
>30 days 16 (2) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 17 (2)
Not reported 81 (8) 17 (19) 3 (50) 1 (14) 102 (9)

Few reports of EM/SJS/TEN described a known trigger or stimulus for these conditions near when vaccine was administered (Table 2). No reports of SJS/TEN or TEN reported recent infection (such as with Mycoplasma or herpes simplex virus 1). Of persons with a history of EM/SJS/TEN, 4 had a similar reaction to past vaccination: (1) a female aged 15 months with EM after varicella vaccine, who later experienced EM after combined measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine; (2) a female aged 2 years with EM after influenza vaccine, who later experienced EM after influenza vaccine; (3) a male aged 10 years with EM after combined diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP), who later experienced EM after a combined diphtheria tetanus booster; and (4) a male aged 27 years with SJS after anthrax vaccine who later experienced SJS after another dose of anthrax vaccine. One patient had an active malignancy: a male aged 78 years who was undergoing radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer, who developed EM 4 days after receiving trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine; notably, this patient had been taking phenytoin for 2 months prior to developing EM.

Table 2.

History of hypersensitivity and exposure to known triggers among U.S. reports of Erythema Multiforme (EM), Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), or SJS/TEN to VAERS, 1999–2017.

EM (%), (n = 984) SJS (%), (n = 89) SJS/TEN (%), (n = 6) TEN (%), (n = 7) Total, N = 1086
Infection, no. (%)
Yes 4 (<1) 2 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (1)
No 980 (>99) 87 (98) 6 (100) 7 (100) 1080 (99)
Medication,a no. (%)
Anticonvulsant 1 (<1) 5 (6) 0 (0) 2 (29) 8 (1)
Antibiotics
Sulfa drugs 4 (<1) 3 (3) 0 (0) 1 (14) 8 (1)
Penicillin 52 (5) 3 (3) 1 (17) 0 (0) 56 (5)
Macrolides 6 (1) 3 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (<1)
NSAIDsb 11 (1) 6 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 8 (1)
Acetaminophen 5 (1) 5 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (1)
Existing/history of hypersensitivity,a no., (%)
EM-SJS-TEN 6 (1) 5 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0) 11 (1)
Atopic dermatitis 25 (3) 2 (2) 1 (17) 1 (14) 29 (3)
Respiratory allergiesc 47 (5) 4 (4) 0 (0) 1 (14) 52 (5)
Drug allergy
Anticonvulsant 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (<1)
Antibiotics
Sulfa drugs 8 (1) 2 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (1)
Penicillin 27 (3) 6 (7) 1 (17) 0 (0) 34 (3)
Macrolide 7 (1) 0 (0) 1 (17) 0 (0) 8 (1)
NSAIDs 4 (<1) 3 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (1)
Acetaminophen 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
a

Not mutually exclusive.

b

NSAID = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

c

Includes asthma/reactive airway disease, allergic sinusitis, and allergic bronchitis.

The most commonly administered vaccines described in reports of EM/SJS/TEN were vaccines commonly administered in infancy and childhood: MMR (22%), DTaP (18%), varicella (18%), and 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate (13%) vaccines (Table 3). Among reports describing the administration of only one vaccine, the most common vaccines were smallpox (16%), trivalent inactivated influenza (15%), and varicella (7%) vaccines.

Table 3.

Most frequently reported vaccines included in U.S. reports of Erythema Multiforme (EM), Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), or SJS/TEN submitted to VAERS, 1999–2017.

All vaccines Vaccines administered alone
Vaccinea No. (%) Vaccinea No. (%)
MMR 237 (22) Smallpox 80 (16)
DTaP 199 (18) Inactivated influenza, trivalent 74 (15)
Varicella 196 (18) Varicella 34 (7)
7-valent pneumococcal conjugate 146 (13) Pneumococcal polysaccharide 29 (6)
Inactivated influenza, trivalent 128 (12) Hepatitis A 25 (5)
Haemophilus influenzae b 119 (11) MMR 25 (5)
Inactivated polio 119 (11) Hepatitis B 22 (5)
Smallpox 109 (10) Herpes zoster 22 (5)
Hepatitis A 108 (10) DTaP 17 (3)
Hepatitis B 67 (6) 4-valent human papillomavirus 17 (3)
13-valent pneumococcal conjugate 50 (5) 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate 16 (3)
Pneumococcal polysaccharide 43 (4) Live attenuated influenza, trivalent 13 (3)
a

DTaP = combined diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine; MMR = combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; unless administered alone, listed vaccines are not mutually exclusive.

3.2. Reported deaths

We identified 6 reports of persons who developed EM/SJS/TEN after vaccination, and subsequently died (Table 4): 4 received medications known to trigger EM/SJS/TEN prior to or at the time of vaccination. Two patients received varicella vaccine, and 2 patients received inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine.

Table 4.

U.S. reports to VAERS of Erythema Multiforme (EM), Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), or SJS/TEN with subsequent death of the patient, 1999–2017.

Patient Age, years Sex Past medical history Vaccine (s) receiveda Diagnosis Onset, days Clinical course Cause of death
1 1 Male Bronchitis, atopic dermatitis Hepatitis B, varicella TEN 2 Receiving amoxicillin/clavulanate and phenobarbital at time of vaccination; developed TEN with desquamation on 50% of BSA. Sepsis with E. coli and S. aureus and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy
2 1 Female Allergies (unspecified), atopic dermatitis MMR, PNC7, varicella EM 9 Developed fever of 101° F, vomiting, dehydration, and rash consistent with EM; later presented to emergency room with marked dehydration, suffered from hypovolemic shock, and died. Unknown (autopsy declined)
3 25 Female None Anthrax, typhoid TEN 13 Few details available; treated for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, subsequently developed TEN and cardiopulmonary arrest Cardiopulmonary arrest
4 43 Female Post-herpetic neuralgia IIV SJS/TEN 3 Receiving amoxicillin at time of vaccination; presented with SJS, was diagnosed with SJS/TEN Respiratory failure
5 71 Male Multiple myeloma, rheumatic heart disease, gout IIV TEN 1 Began allopurinol for gout 8 weeks prior to vaccination; developed TEN with desquamation of 80–90% of BSA. Not specified
6 82 Male Chronic kidney disease, type I diabetes Not reported TEN Not reported Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole administered at time of vaccination, subsequently developed TEN Not specified
a

BSA = body surface area; F = Fahrenheit; IIV = trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine; MMR = combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; PNC7 = 7-valent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine.

3.3. Estimated reporting rates

During 2006 through 2016, EM after varicella vaccine was reported to VAERS at an estimated rate of 1.0 per 1 million doses distributed; SJS after varicella vaccine was reported at an estimated rate of 0.1 per 1 million doses distributed. No reports of SJS/TEN or TEN after varicella vaccine were identified. Regardless of age group, estimated median reporting rates of EM, SJS, and TEN to VAERS during 2010 through 2017 after influenza vaccine (all types) were ≤0.1, <0.1, and <0.1 per 1 million doses administered, respectively; no reports of SJS/TEN after influenza vaccines were identified.

3.4. Data mining (disproportionate reporting)

We found elevated data mining statistics (EB05 ≥ 2.0) for “erythema multiforme” following smallpox vaccination among persons aged 19–49 years. When we restricted data mining analyses to serious reports only, or to reports identified through text field searches, we did not identify disproportional reporting for any vaccine-EM/SJS/TEN combination.

4. Discussion

Historically, EM/SJS/TEN have rarely been reported after vaccination [1]. Consistent with this history, an analysis of VAERS reports during 1990 to 1999 found few reports of SJS and/or TEN after vaccination [9]. Our analysis of VAERS data during 1999 through 2017 identified no new safety concerns, despite the introduction of several new vaccines since 1999. While these data are reassuring, new vaccines continue to be introduced to the market [23,24]. Continued surveillance for increased reporting of EM/SJS/ TEN (SJS and TEN in particular) is therefore warranted.

Data from a systematic review by Chahal et al. and case reports from other groups have described median ages of 7 years for EM (range of <1–49 years) and 13–15 years (range of 1–75 years) for both SJS and TEN after vaccination [25,26]. The younger reported median age for EM in our analysis might reflect the younger age at which persons receive most of their vaccinations [15]. Reported sex was generally consistent with previous analyses [8,27].

Reported times from exposure to the suspected trigger, to onset of the rash, vary for SJS and TEN, ranging from a median of 10 days to a median of 3 weeks or longer [28,29]. A median of 6 days from vaccination to onset of EM has been observed [25]. Similarly, we observed varying reported times to onset of symptoms after vaccination but found that most events occurred within 14 days and rarely after 30 days; most SJS with known time to onset began within 3 days of vaccination. Notably, AEs are frequently reported when occurring within a short time after a potentially attributable trigger, regardless if a true association exists [30].

We observed no concerning patterns of reporting of EM/SJS/TEN after any particular vaccine. Reported vaccines seemed to reflect age groups for which vaccines are recommended: EM/SJS/TEN were mostly reported after childhood vaccines among persons receiving multiple vaccines simultaneously, but mostly reported after smallpox and inactivated influenza vaccines among persons receiving single vaccines (Table 3) [15,31]. Likewise, our data mining analyses identified no notable vaccine-AE combinations for EM/SJS/TEN following vaccination overall. Data mining did identify disproportionate reporting of EM following smallpox vaccination among persons aged 19–49 years. This age distribution is consistent with the age ranges of military personnel and selected civilian populations vaccinated due to concerns of potential bioterrorism and orthopoxvirus outbreaks per U.S. vaccination policy [3234]. EM is a well-documented complication of smallpox vaccination, and the package insert for ACAM2000™ (live vaccinia virus smallpox vaccine) includes a “boxed warning” alerting about the risk of “EM major” (i.e., SJS), following either primary vaccination or revaccination with live vaccinia virus smallpox vaccine. Overall, our observations are consistent with previous descriptions of EM/SJS/TEN after vaccination [3537].

While prior episodes of EM/SJS/TEN in a patient might indicate a predisposition to subsequent episodes, the likelihood of such an occurrence is unclear. Of the 4 persons we describe who previously experienced EM or SJS after vaccination, two experienced another episode of EM or SJS after the same vaccine (positive rechallenge). In a case series of nine children with a history of SJS precipitated by Mycoplasma infection, one developed a subsequent episode of SJS after a repeat infection with Mycoplasma [38,39]. Likewise, persons with a history of EM after infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV) can develop subsequent episodes of EM with recurrence of HSV [40]. However, our analysis (Table 2) and reports by other investigators [41] describe few persons with exposure to known precipitants of EM/SJS/TEN, or a history of allergies or other hyper-sensitivities. Notably, a patient who experienced SJS after infection with wild-type influenza B virus received multiple seasonal influenza vaccinations with no subsequent episodes of SJS [42]. Together, these observations suggest further exploration into predisposing factors for EM/SJS/TEN, including vaccines, is warranted.

SJS and TEN can be dire conditions, with case fatalities as high as 35% observed for TEN [43]. Consistent with this observation, 5 of the 6 deaths among reports of EM/SJS/TEN after vaccination had either TEN or SJS/TEN (Table 4). However, any association with vaccination is dubious, given that 4 reports described receipt of a medication known to cause SJS or TEN. Additionally, 1 report involved treatment for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NDMA) receptor encephalitis and subsequent TEN; while treatment was unspecified, cyclophosphamide has been used to treat anti-NDMA receptor encephalitis and is known to cause SJS and TEN [44,45]. The 1 report of death after EM described a woman who experienced considerable vomiting, subsequent dehydration, and shock; the degree to which EM contributed to her death is uncertain.

Previous investigators have estimated rates of EM/SJS/TEN after drug exposure as high as 200 per 1 million persons exposed (phenobarbital) [8]. Our estimated reporting rates of EM/SJS/TEN after varicella and influenza vaccines were well below this figure (i.e., the highest estimate was 1.0 report of EM per million doses of varicella vaccine distributed), a notable observation considering that varicella vaccine was one of the most commonly reported vaccines after which EM/SJS/TEN occurred. Despite potentially underestimating rates, our data suggest that EM/SJS/TEN is reported no more frequently after vaccination than after known causes of these conditions. Importantly, while EM/SJS/TEN can occur after vaccination, previous post-marketing analyses and case-control studies demonstrate that vaccination itself does not increase the likelihood of these conditions [46,47].

These data have limitations. As a passive reporting system, VAERS is subject to reporting biases, under-reporting, inconsistent data quality and completeness, and changes in reporting over time; reports to VAERS also lack an unvaccinated comparison group. These limitations generally do not allow VAERS data to determine if a vaccine caused a particular adverse event, including EM/SJS/TEN [11]. Because data on doses distributed or administered are not available for many of the vaccines in this analysis, our ability to estimate reporting rates for EM/SJS/TEN was limited to varicella and influenza vaccines and are likely underestimates. Despite these limitations, results from data mining reflect known associations (i.e., smallpox vaccine and EM) [48,49].

While EM (and to a lesser degree, SJS) is typically benign and self-limiting [1,50], SJS/TEN and TEN can be life-threatening. [43] Surveillance for unexpected, increased reporting of these conditions after vaccination should therefore continue. Fortunately, our observations and the observations of other investigators [1,9] suggest that EM/SJS/TEN rarely occur after vaccination.

Abbreviations:

AE

adverse event

BSA

body surface area

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

DTaP

combined diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine

EM

erythema multiforme

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

IIV

trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine

MGPS

Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker

MedDRA

Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities

MMR

combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine

NDMA

N-methyl-D-aspartate

NSAID

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

PNC7

7-valent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine

PT

Preferred Term

SJS

Stevens Johnson Syndrome

TEN

toxic epidermal necrolysis

VAERS

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

Footnotes

5.

Note

This article reflects the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent FDA’s views or policies.

6.

Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer

Publisher's Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), or the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Mention of a product or company name does not constitute endorsement by the CDC or FDA.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • [1].Rosenblatt AE, Stein SL. Cutaneous reactions to vaccinations. Clin Dermatol 2015;33:327–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].World Health Organization. Vaccine Safety Basics e-learning course, Module 3: Adverse events following immunization. Available at: http://vaccine-safety-training.org/vaccine-reactions.html.
  • [3].Patja A, Davidkin I, Kurki T, Kallio MJ, Valle M, Peltola H. Serious adverse events after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination during a fourteen-year prospective follow-up. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:1127–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Gente Lidholm A, Bergfors E, Inerot A, Blomgren U, Gillstedt M, Trollfors B. Unexpected loss of contact allergy to aluminium induced by vaccine. Contact Dermatitis 2013;68:286–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Criado PR, de Oliveira Ramos R, Vasconcellos C, Jardim Criado RF, Valente NY. Two case reports of cutaneous adverse reactions following hepatitis B vaccine: lichen planus and granuloma annulare. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004;18:603–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Alerhand S, Cassella C, Koyfman A. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in the pediatric population: a review. Pediatr Emerg Care 2016;32:472–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Bastuji-Garin S, Rzany B, Stern RS, Shear NH, Naldi L, Roujeau JC. Clinical classification of cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and erythema multiforme. Arch Dermatol 1993;129:92–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Chan HL, Stern RS, Arndt KA, et al. The incidence of erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. A population-based study with particular reference to reactions caused by drugs among outpatients. Arch Dermatol 1990;126:43–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Ball R, Ball LK, Wise RP, Braun MM, Beeler JA, Salive ME. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis after vaccination: reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:219–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Vaccines: Table 1. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/usvaccines.pdf. Accessed September 26, 2018 2018.
  • [11].Shimabukuro TT, Nguyen M, Martin D, DeStefano F. Safety monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine 2015;33:4398–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Varricchio F, Iskander J, Destefano F, et al. Understanding vaccine safety information from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:287–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].MEDDRA. Available at: www.meddra.com.
  • [14].Government Publication Office. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Available at: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=9204d57c02b340d41b55e5b26fcfb00c&mc=true&node=se21.7.600_180&rgn=div8 Accessed 16 Jul 2019 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Robinson CL, Romero JR, Kempe A, Pellegrini C. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Child/Adolescent Immunization Work G. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger - United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:134–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Gillis NK, Hicks JK, Bell GC, Daly AJ, Kanetsky PA, McLeod HL. Incidence and triggers of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in a large cancer patient cohort. J Invest Dermatol 2017;137:2021–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Food and Drug Administration. Vaccines Licensed for Use in the United States. 2018. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm093833.htm. Accessed January 10, 2019.
  • [18].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Wonder: Bridged-Race Population Estimates 2017. Available at: https://wonder.cdc.gov/bridged-race-population.html. Accessed January 10, 2019 2019.
  • [19].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza Vaccination Coverage: FluVaxView. 2017. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/index.htm. Accessed January 10; 2019.
  • [20].DuMouchel W Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables, with an application to the FDA spontaneous reporting system. Am Stat 1999;53:177–90. [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Szarfman A, Machado SG, O’Neill RT. Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the US FDA’s spontaneous reports database. Drug Saf 2002;25:381–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Available at: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html.
  • [23].Food and Drug Administration. Heplisav-B. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm584752.htm. Accessed 4 March 2019.
  • [24].Hesse EM, Shimabukuro TT, Su JR, et al. Postlicensure Safety Surveillance of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (Shingrix) - United States, October 2017-June 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:91–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Chahal D, Aleshin M, Turegano M, Chiu M, Worswick S. Vaccine-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case and systematic review. Dermatol Online J 2018;24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Oda T, Sawada Y, Okada E, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome after influenza vaccine injection. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2017;27:274–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Paquet P, Pierard GE. Erythema multiforme and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a comparative study. Am J Dermatopathol 1997;19:127–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128:35–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Wang XQ, Lv B, Wang HF, et al. Lamotrigine-induced severe cutaneous adverse reaction: update data from 1999–2014. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:1005–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Speirs CJ, Griffin JP, Weber JC, Glen-Bott M. Demography of the UK adverse reactions register of spontaneous reports. Health Trends 1984;16:49–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Kim DK, Riley LE, Harriman KH, Hunter P, Bridges CB, Advisory Committee on Immunization P. Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2017. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:209–19.28166560 [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Greenberg RN, Kennedy JS. ACAM2000: a newly licensed cell culture-based live vaccinia smallpox vaccine. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2008;17:555–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Petersen BW, Harms TJ, Reynolds MG, Harrison LH. Use of vaccinia virus smallpox vaccine in laboratory and health care personnel at risk for occupational exposure to orthopoxviruses - recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:257–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Voigt EA, Kennedy RB, Poland GA. Defending against smallpox: a focus on vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 2016;15:1197–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Frey SE, Newman FK, Yan L, Lottenbach KR, Belshe RB. Response to smallpox vaccine in persons immunized in the distant past. JAMA 2003;289:3295–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Katoulis AC, Liakou A, Bozi E, et al. Erythema multiforme following vaccination for human papillomavirus. Dermatology 2010;220:60–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Stratton KR, Howe CJ, Johnston RB Jr. Adverse events associated with childhood vaccines other than pertussis and rubella. Summary of a report from the Institute of Medicine. JAMA 1994;271:1602–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Olson D, Abbott J, Lin C, Prok L, Dominguez SR. Characterization of Children With Recurrent Episodes of Stevens Johnson Syndrome. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2017;6:e140–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Olson D, Watkins LK, Demirjian A, et al. Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Pediatrics 2015;136:e386–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Huff JC. Acyclovir for recurrent erythema multiforme caused by herpes simplex. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;18:197–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Siedner-Weintraub Y, Gross I, David A, Reif S, Molho-Pessach V. Paediatric erythema multiforme: epidemiological, clinical and laboratory characteristics. Acta Derm Venereol 2017;97:489–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Tamez RL, Tan WV, O’Malley JT, et al. Influenza B virus infection and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol 2018;35:e45–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Miliszewski MA, Kirchhof MG, Sikora S, Papp A, Dutz JP. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: an analysis of triggers and implications for improving prevention. Am J Med 2016;129:1221–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Jarrett B, Ghazala S, Chao J, Chaudhary S. Case of Steven-Johnson Syndrome in a male with breast cancer secondary to docetaxel/cyclophosphamide therapy. BMJ Case Rep 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Patel MP, Kute VB, Vanikar AV, Trivedi HL. Cyclophosphamide-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis: vigilance needed. Clin Kidney J 2014;7:323–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Daley MF, Yih WK, Glanz JM, et al. Safety of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccine. Vaccine 2014;32:3019–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Raucci U, Rossi R, Da Cas R, et al. Stevens-johnson syndrome associated with drugs and vaccines in children: a case-control study. PLoS ONE 2013;8: e68231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Bessinger GT, Smith SB, Olivere JW, James BL. Benign hypersensitivity reactions to smallpox vaccine. Int J Dermatol 2007;46:460–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Frey SE, Couch RB, Tacket CO, et al. Clinical responses to undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1265–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Leaute-Labreze C, Lamireau T, Chawki D, Maleville J, Taieb A. Diagnosis, classification, and management of erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Arch Dis Child 2000;83:347–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES