Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Jan 25;29:105194. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105194

Dataset used in the economic evaluation trastuzumab-based regimens for HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients in the Taiwanese healthcare setting

Vakaramoko Diaby a,, Ching-Yu Wang a, Hussain Alqhtani a,b, Sascha van Boemmel-Wegmann a, Askal Ayalew Ali c, Rajesh Balkrishnan d, Yu Ko e, Sofia Palacio f, Gilberto de Lima Lopes f
PMCID: PMC7011026  PMID: 32071975

Abstract

The present data article aims to describe the input parameters for a Markov model assessing the cost-effectiveness of four treatment sequences for patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer. The model input parameters include costs for physician visits, drugs, adverse event management, computed tomography (CT) scan, laboratory tests, echocardiogram, utilities, disutilities as well as the shape and scale parameters of a log-logistic distribution used for the transition probabilities.

Keywords: Markov model, Metastatic breast cancer, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Treatment sequence


Specifications Table

Subject Economics and Econometrics
Specific subject area Cost-effectiveness analysis
Type of data Tables
How data were acquired Data were obtained from clinical trials, published literature and Taiwanese National Health Insurance Administration's website.
Data format Raw and analyzed data
Parameters for data collection Data were obtained for metastatic breast cancer patients in the Taiwanese setting.
Description of data collection Cost data were mostly obtained from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Administration website and further calculated based on average weight and body surface area for Taiwanese females. Transition probabilities were estimated following a survival analysis of approximated individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves of clinical trials. Utilities were obtained from published literature.
Data source location Taiwan and literature
Data accessibility Data were included in this article
Related research article A cost-effectiveness analysis of Trastuzumab-Containing Treatment Sequences for HER-2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Taiwan. The Breast (Revision submitted).
Value of the Data
  • Our data provide input parameters for cost, utilities and transition probabilities for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of Trastuzumab-based regimens for metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan.

  • Researchers conducting economic evaluation including cost-effectiveness analysis and cost of illness studies for metastatic breast cancer patients would benefit from these data.

  • Parenteral drug costs provided in this article are adjusted for wastage through a scenario analysis.

1. Data

The dataset includes the model input parameters for a Markov model assessing the cost-effectiveness of four trastuzumab containing sequences for HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients as well as a brief description of the model assumptions. These input parameters include cost, transition probabilities, and utilities. Cost data include physician visit fee (Table 1), treatment acquisition cost both considering or not considering drug wastage (Table 2), costs associated with adverse event management (Table 2, Table 3), costs for computed tomography (CT) scan and echocardiogram and laboratory costs (Table 4). For transition probabilities, the shape and scale parameters for progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated as well as the probability of developing adverse events while on different treatment regimens. The entire list of model input parameters including the lower and higher bounds for deterministic sensitivity analysis as well as the distribution and standard deviations for probabilistic sensitivity analyses are shown in Table 5, Table 6 for base case and no drug wastage scenarios respectively.

Table 1.

Physician visit costs and treatment acquisition costs.

Input parameters - Costs Assumption and cost calculation
Monthly cost for physician visit
  • Cost for physician visit = $8.15 [1]

  • Visit every 3 weeks or every 0.69 months

  • 8.15*0.69 = 4.348125

  • Base case scenario

Acquisition cost of treatments— Pertuzumab, Docetaxel, Trastuzumab [PTH] vs. Docetaxel/Trastuzumab [TH] [2]
  • Assumption: Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles of docetaxel. Trastuzumab/pertuzumab alone was continued to avoid neuropathy in case patients responded to treatments.

  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of docetaxel: 40mg/ml 0.5ml vial, $132.68; 40mg/ml 2ml vial, $500.50; 75 mg/m2, assuming body surface area (BSA) of 1.59 = 119.25 mg = 1 vial 40mg/ml 2ml + 2x 40mg/ml 0.5ml = $765.86

  • Cost of Trastuzumab: 440 mg vial, $1852.07; Day 1 Cycle 1 is 8 mg/kg, which would be 464.8 mg = 2 × 440mg = $3704.14 for an average person weighing 58.1 Kg; Subsequent cycles 6 mg/kg which would be 348.6 mg = 1 × 440 mg = $1852.07 for an average person weighing 58.1 Kg

  • Cost of pertuzumab: 420 mg, $2282.21; Initial cycle 1 dose is 840 mg, or $4564.42; Subsequent doses are 420 mg or $2282.21

  • Cost of Pegfilgrastim: 6mg, $662.68 per cycle cost for 6 cycles

  • Total weekly cost of Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, Docetaxel [THP], plus pegfilgrastim: week 1: $9697.10 = $765.86+$3704.14+$4564.42+$662.68

  • weeks 4,7,10,13,16: $5562.82 = $765.86+$1852.07+$2282.21+$662.68

  • weeks 17,20,23,26, 29, and beyond (no docetaxel): $4134.28 = $1852.07+$2282.21

  • Total weekly cost of Trastuzumab, Docetaxel [TH], no pegfilgrastim: week 1: $4470.00 = $765.86+$3704.14

  • weeks 4,7,10,13,16: $2617.93 = $765.86+$1852.07

  • weeks 17,20,23,26, 29, and beyond (no docetaxel): $1852.07

Acquisition cost of treatments—
Trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1)
  • Assumption: patient received TDM-1 every 3 weeks

  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of TDM-1: 10 mg, $1794.71; 160 mg, $2871.77; dose is 3.6 mg/kg which is 209.16 mg for an average person weighing 58.1 Kg; 1 × 160mg + 1 × 100 mg; $4666.48 every 21 days

  • Total cost of TDM-1 (every 3 weeks): $4666.48

Acquisition cost of treatments—
Lapatinib + Capecitabine (Xeloda)
  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of Lapatinib: 1500 mg, $97.74 (daily); weekly cost of lapatinib is $684.18

  • Cost of Capecitabine: 500 mg, $3.23; dose is 2000 mg/m2 daily which is 3180 mg or 7 tablets daily for an average person with BSA of 1.59; $22.61 per day; x14 days on with 1 week rest; weekly cost of capecitabine is $158.27 ($22.61x7), assuming 2 weeks of treatment per cycle

  • Total cost of Lapatinib + Capecitabine:

  • Weeks 1 and 2, weekly cost is: $842.45=($684.18 + 158.27)

  • Week 3 weekly cost is: $684.18

  • Week 4, weekly cost is: $842.45=($684.18 + 158.27)

Acquisition cost of treatments—
Trastuzumab + Lapatinib
  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of Trastuzumab: Loading Dose trastuzumab 8 mg/kg which is 464.8 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 2 × 440mg; $3704.14; Maintenance dose trastuzumab 6 mg/kg which is 348.6 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 1 × 440 mg every 3 weeks; $1852.07

  • Cost of Lapatinib: 1500 mg, $97.74 (daily); weekly cost of lapatinib is $684.18

  • Total cost of Trastuzumab + Lapatinib:

  • Week 1: $4388.32 = $3704.14+$684.18

  • Week 2,3: $684.18

  • Week 4: $2536.25 = $1852.07+$684.18

  • Week 5,6: $684.18

  • Week 7,10,13,16, etc: $2536.25

  • Week 8,9,11,12,14,15,17,18, etc.: $684.18

Acquisition cost of treatments—Trastuzumab + Capecitabine
  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of Trastuzumab: Loading Dose trastuzumab 8 mg/kg which is 464.8 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 2 × 440mg; $3704.14; Maintenance dose trastuzumab 6 mg/kg which is 348.6 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 1 × 440 mg every 3 weeks; $1852.07

  • Cost of Capecitabine: 500 mg, $3.23; dose is 2000 mg/m2 daily which is 3180 mg or 7 tablets daily for an average person with BSA of 1.59; $22.61 per day; x14 days on with 1 week rest; weekly cost of capecitabine is $158.27 ($22.61x7), assuming 2 weeks of treatment per cycle

  • Total cost of Trastuzumab + Capecitabine:

  • Week 1: $3862.41 = $3704.14+$158.27

  • Week 2: $158.27

  • Week 3: $3704.14

  • Week 4: $2010.34 = $1852.07+$158.27

  • Week 5: $158.27

  • Week 6: $3704.14

  • Week 7: $2010.34 = $1852.07+$158.27

  • Week 8: $158.27

  • Week 9: $3704.14

  • Weeks 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, etc…: $2010.34 = $1852.07+$158.27

  • Weeks 11,14,17,20,23, etc…:$158.27

  • Weeks 12,15,18,21,24, etc…:$3704.14

No drug wastage scenario
Acquisition cost of treatments— Pertuzumab, Docetaxel, Trastuzumab [PTH] vs. Docetaxel/Trastuzumab [TH] [2]
  • Assumption: Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles of docetaxel, and then if they were responding trastuzumab/pertuzumab alone was continued to avoid neuropathy.

  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of docetaxel: 40mg/ml 0.5ml vial, $132.68; 40mg/ml 2ml vial, $500.50; 75 mg/m2, assuming body surface area (BSA) of 1.59 = 119.25 mg = 1.49 vial 40mg/ml 2ml = $760.88

  • Cost of trastuzumab: 440 mg vial, $1852.07; Day 1 Cycle 1 is 8 mg/kg, which would be 464.8 mg = 1.056 vials = $1955.79 for an average person weighing 58.1 Kg; Subsequent cycles 6 mg/kg which would be 348.6 mg = 0.792 vials = $1466.84 for an average person weighing 58.1 Kg

  • Cost of pertuzumab: 420 mg, $2282.21; Initial cycle 1 dose is 840 mg, or $4564.42; Subsequent doses are 420 mg or $2282.21

  • Cost of Pegfilgrastim: 6mg, $662.68 per cycle cost for 6 cycles

  • Total weekly cost of Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, Docetaxel [THP], plus pegfilgrastim: week 1: $7,943,77 = $760.88+$1955.79+$4564.42+$662.68

  • weeks 4,7,10,13,16: $5172.61 = $760.88+$1466.84+$2282.21+$662.68

  • weeks 17,20,23,26, 29, and beyond (no docetaxel): $3749.05 = $1466.84+$2282.21

  • Total weekly cost of Trastuzumab, Docetaxel [TH], no pegfilgrastim:

  • week 1: $2716.67 = $760.88+$1955.79

  • weeks 4,7,10,13,16: $2227.72 = $760.88+$1466.84

  • weeks 17,20,23,26, 29, and beyond (no docetaxel): $1466.84

Acquisition cost of treatments—Trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1)
  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Assumption: patient received TDM-1 every 3 weeks

  • Cost of TDM-1: 10 mg, $1794.71; 160 mg, $2871.77; dose is 3.6 mg/kg which is 209.16 mg for an average person weighing 58.1 Kg; 1 × 160mg + 0.4915 × 100mg; $3754.05 every 21 days

  • Total cost of TDM-1 (every 3 weeks): $3754.05

Acquisition cost of treatments—
Lapatinib + Capecitabine (Xeloda)
  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of Lapatinib: 1500 mg, $97.74 (daily); weekly cost of lapatinib is $684.18

  • Cost of Capecitabine: 500 mg, $3.23; dose is 2000 mg/m2 daily which is 3180 mg or 7 tablets daily for an average person with BSA of 1.59; $22.61 per day; x14 days on with 1 week rest; weekly cost of capecitabine is $158.27 ($22.61x7), assuming 2 weeks of treatment per cycle

  • Total cost of Lapatinib + Capecitabine:

  • Weeks 1 and 2, weekly cost is: $842.45=($684.18 + 158.27)

  • Week 3 weekly cost is: $684.18<

  • Week 4, weekly cost is: $842.45=($684.18 + 158.27)

Acquisition cost of treatments—
Trastuzumab + Lapatinib
  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of Trastuzumab: Loading Dose trastuzumab 8 mg/kg which is 464.8 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 1.056 × 440mg; $1955.79; Maintenance dose trastuzumab 6 mg/kg which is 348.6 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 0.792 × 440 mg every 3 weeks; $1466.84

  • Cost of Lapatinib: 1500 mg, $97.74 (daily); weekly cost of lapatinib is $684.18

  • Total cost of Trastuzumab + Lapatinib:

  • Week 1: $2639.97 = $1955.79+$684.18

  • Week 2,3: $684.18

  • Week 4: $2151.02 = $1466.84+$684.18

  • Week 5,6: $684.18

  • Week 7,10,13,16, etc: $2151.02

  • Week 8,9,11,12,14,15,17,18, etc.: $684.18

Acquisition cost of treatments—Trastuzumab + Capecitabine
  • Drug Costs (per unit) were Average Sale Prices (ASP) from National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare (March 2017) [3,4]

  • Cost of Trastuzumab: Loading Dose trastuzumab 8 mg/kg which is 464.8 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 1.056 × 440mg; $1955.79

  • Maintenance dose trastuzumab 6 mg/kg which is 348.6 mg for an average person weighing 58.1kg; 0.792 × 440 mg every 3 weeks; $1466.84

  • Cost of Capecitabine: 500 mg, $3.23; dose is 2000 mg/m2 daily which is 3180 mg or 7 tablets daily for an average person with BSA of 1.59; $22.61 per day; x14 days on with 1 week rest; weekly cost of capecitabine is $158.27 ($22.61x7), assuming 2 weeks of treatment per cycle

  • Total cost of Trastuzumab + Capecitabine:

  • Week 1: $2114.06 = $1955.79+$158.27

  • Week 2: $158.27

  • Week 3: $1955.79

  • Week 4: $1625.11 = $1466.84+$158.27<

  • Week 5: $158.27

  • Week 6: $1955.79

  • Week 7: $1625.11 = $1466.84+$158.27<

  • Week 8: $158.27

  • Week 9: $1955.79

  • Weeks 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, etc…: $1625.11 = $1466.84+$158.27

  • Weeks 11,14,17,20,23, etc…:$158.27

  • Weeks 12,15,18,21,24, etc…:$1955.79

Table 2.

Cost associated with adverse event management.

Adverse events Costs in 2018 USD
Reference
Average Lower bound Upper bound
Diarrhea 3586.31 1766.39 7172.62 Niraula et al. [5]
Neutropenia 6904.98 3532.78 18038.6 Niraula et al. [5]
Febrile neutropenia 22481.34 11240.67 46033.23 Niraula et al. [5]
Thrombocytopenia 18199.18 9046.06 35863.1 Niraula et al. [5]
Hand-foot syndrome/Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia/skin changes 2034.03 1017.01 4121.58 Niraula et al. [5]
Rash 321.16 160.58 535.27 Niraula et al. [5]
Nausea/Vomiting 6958.51 3479.26 13917.02 Niraula et al. [5]
Fatigue 1017.01 535.27 909.96 Niraula et al. [5]
Dyspnea 4720.63 Sharpe [6]
Cardiovascular disorder 2410.24 1826.86 4871.63 Garrison et al. [7]

*Original costs were inflated to represent 2018 U.S. dollars costs using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation calculator from the Bureau Labor of Statistics (available at http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm)

Table 3.

Estimated per-patient cost (2018 US dollars)aof managing treatment-related grade 3 and above adverse events that occurred in ≥ 5% of patients.

Adverse event Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel Trastuzumab + Docetaxel TDM1 Lapatinib + Capecitabine Trastuzumab + Lapatinib Trastuzumab + Capecitabine
Trial Swain et al. [2] Swain et al. [2] Verma et al. [8] Geyer et al. [9] Blackwell et al. [10] von Minckwitz et al. [11]
Diarrhea 322.76 (158.97; 645.53) 459.05 (226.10; 918.10) 251.05 (123.65; 502.09) 191.15 (94.15; 382.30)
Neutropenia 3383.44 (1731.06; 8838.92) 3176.29 (1625.08; 8297.75)
Febrile neutropenia 2922.58 (1461.29; 5984.33) 1573.69 (786.85; 3222.32)
Thrombocytopenia 2347.69 (1166.94; 4626.34)
Hand-foot syndrome/Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia/skin changes 142.38 (71.19; 288.50) 660.44 (330.22; 1338.27)
Rash 70.65 (35.32; 117.76)
Nausea/Vomiting
Fatigue
Dyspnea
Cardiovascular disorder 125.09 (94.82; 252.83)
Total 6628.78 (3351.33; 115468.77) 4749.98 (2411.92; 11520.08) 2347.69 (1166.94; 4626.34) 601.43 (297.29: 1206.61) 321.70 (158.98; 619.85) 976.68 (519.18; 1973.40)
a

Original costs were inflated to represent 2018 U.S. dollars costs using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation calculator from the Bureau Labor of Statistics (available at http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm); Anorexia and headache were excluded based on clinical expert opinion; -: Adverse events occurred in less than 5% of patients.

Table 4.

Costs and assumptions for computed tomography (CT) scan, laboratory tests, echocardiogram.

Cost input parameter Assumption and cost calculation
Computed tomography (CT) scan [1]
  • Assumption: CT scan every 2 months or 8.69625 weeks

  • Reimbursement item code of National Health Insurance: 33071B CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis ($142.86)

  • Cost of CT scan (every 9 weeks): $142.86

Laboratory tests [1]
  • Assumption: Every three weeks or 0.69 months

  • Comprehensive metabolic panel ($15.71); Complete blood count ($6.27)

  • Cost of blood tests (every three weeks): $22.98

Echocardiogram [1]
  • Assumption: Only for patients receiving HER2 therapy, every 3 months or 13.044 weeks

  • Echocardiography, transthoracic, real-time with image documentation ($99.52)

  • Cost of an echocardiogram (every 13 weeks): $99.52

Table 5.

Model input parameters for base case scenario.

Parameters Unit Baseline Deterministic SA
Probabilistic SA
Assumptions
Low High PSA (SD) Distribution
Medical visit
Physician fees Every 3 weeks 8.15 6.11 10.19 1.01875 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Acquisition cost of treatments
Loading dose pertuzumab (840 mg) 1st week of treatment only 4564.42 2282.21 6846.63 1141.105 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Maintenance dose pertuzumab (420 mg) Every 3 weeks starting from week 4 2282.21 1141.11 3423.32 570.5525 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Loading dose trastuzumab (8mg/kg) - 1st week of treatment only 3704.14 1852.07 5556.21 926.035 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Maintenance dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) Every 3 weeks starting from week 4 1852.07 926.04 2778.11 463.0175 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Docetaxel (1 mg) Every 3 weeks for 6 cycles 765.86 382.93 1148.79 191.465 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Pegfilgrastim (6 mg) Every 3 weeks for 6 cycles 662.68 331.34 994.02 165.67 Gamma 50% +/− rule
TDM1 Every 3 weeks 4666.48 2333.24 6999.72 1166.62 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Capecitabine (500 mg) Assuming 2 weeks of treatment per cycle + 1 week rest 158.27 79.14 237.41 39.5675 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Lapatinib (1500 mg daily) Weekly 684.18 342.09 1026.27 171.045 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Cost of the management of Adverse Events (grade 3/4)
Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 1 time 6628.784 3351.325 15468.774 3029.362 Gamma Calculated
Trastuzumab + docetaxel 1 time 4749.982 2411.924 11520.075 2277.038 Gamma Calculated
T-DM1 1 time 2347.695 1166.942 4626.3412 864.8498 Gamma Calculated
Lapatinib + capecitabine 1 time 601.4326 297.29 1160.6912 215.8503 Gamma Calculated
Trastuzumab + lapatinib 1 time 321.70 158.9764 619.84961 115.2183 Gamma Calculated
Trastuzumab + capecitabine 1 time 976.6843 519.1815 1954.2796 358.7745 Gamma Calculated
Cost of Computed tomography (CT) scan Every 9 weeks 142.8571 107.1429 178.57143 17.85714 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Laboratory tests
Cost of blood work Every 3 weeks 6.27 4.7025 7.8375 0.78375 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Cost of echocardiogram Every 13 weeks 119.05 89.2875 148.8125 14.88125 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Cost of palliative care/End of life 1 time 7185.721 3592.86 10778.581 1796.43 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Utilities
Progression-free under treatment 0.785746 0.484478 0.9346889 0.112553 Beta Calculated
Treatment response 0.061 0.025215 0.0742449 0.012257 Beta Calculated
Disease progression under treatment 0.538 0.195937 0.8475389 0.162901 Beta Calculated
Disutilities
Disease progression −0.248 −0.28854 −0.0871499 −0.050348 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel −0.05553 −0.09841 −0.0156854 −0.02068 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for trastuzumab + docetaxel −0.03953 −0.05795 −0.0112224 −0.011682 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for TDM1 −0.00851 −0.01246 −0.0024128 −0.002512 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for lapatinib + capecitabine −0.01826 −0.03193 −0.00395 −0.006996 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for trastuzumab + lapatinib −0.01716 −0.02629 −0.00425 −0.005509 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for trastuzumab + capecitabine −0.04017 −0.0747 −0.0092301 −0.016367 Negative Beta/Uniform Calculated
Shape and scale parameters
OS shape (Gamma)
OS shape for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + Docetaxel 0.543696 0.460437 0.6420112 0.09264 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.576501 0.501151 0.6631802 0.082668 Gamma Regression
OS shape for TDM1 0.474333 0.414168 0.5432391 0.065853 Gamma Regression
OS shape for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.464784 0.356733 0.605561 0.126953 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.588267 0.467906 0.7395881 0.138613 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.451302 0.33817 0.6022825 0.134751 Gamma Regression
OS scale (Lambda)
OS scale for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.019241 0.016447 0.0225107 0.003094 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.024996 0.021942 0.028476 0.003334 Gamma Regression
OS scale for TDM1 0.032557 0.029043 0.0364946 0.003802 Gamma Regression
OS scale for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.015981 0.0126 0.0202686 0.003912 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.018985 0.015258 0.0236232 0.004268 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.040966 0.032984 0.0508812 0.009131 Gamma Regression
PFS shape (Gamma)
PFS shape for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.621872 0.560543 0.6899112 0.066004 Gamma Regression
OS shape (Gamma)
OS shape for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + Docetaxel 0.543696 0.460437 0.6420112 0.09264 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.576501 0.501151 0.6631802 0.082668 Gamma Regression
OS shape for TDM1 0.474333 0.414168 0.5432391 0.065853 Gamma Regression
OS shape for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.464784 0.356733 0.605561 0.126953 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.588267 0.467906 0.7395881 0.138613 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.451302 0.33817 0.6022825 0.134751 Gamma Regression
OS scale (Lambda)
OS scale for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.019241 0.016447 0.0225107 0.003094 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.024996 0.021942 0.028476 0.003334 Gamma Regression
OS scale for TDM1 0.032557 0.029043 0.0364946 0.003802 Gamma Regression
OS scale for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.015981 0.0126 0.0202686 0.003912 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.018985 0.015258 0.0236232 0.004268 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.040966 0.032984 0.0508812 0.009131 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.555381 0.504406 0.6115074 0.054643 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for TDM1 0.610611 0.55205 0.6753828 0.062925 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.516163 0.422877 0.6300273 0.105689 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for trastuzumab + Lapatinib 0.553842 0.480821 0.637952 0.080169 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.508397 0.410262 0.6300055 0.112114 Gamma Regression
PFS scale (Lambda)
PFS scale for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.052051 0.046527 0.0582304 0.005971 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.074128 0.067234 0.081729 0.007396 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for TDM1 0.104256 0.093296 0.116504 0.011841 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.03389 0.027966 0.0410695 0.006685 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.082315 0.069929 0.0968932 0.013757 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.115186 0.093703 0.1415951 0.024435 Gamma Regression
Weekly probability of developing adverse events
Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.002564 0.001282 0.0038466 0.000641 Beta Calculated
Trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.001969 0.000984 0.0029528 0.000492 Beta Calculated
TDM1 0.004039 0.00202 0.0060591 0.00101 Beta Calculated
Lapatinib + capecitabine 0.0105 0.00525 0.0157506 0.002625 Beta Calculated
Trastuzumab + Lapatinib 0.001941 0.000971 0.0029122 0.000485 Beta Calculated
Trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.005766 0.002883 0.0086493 0.001442 Beta Calculated
Discount rate – weekly 0.000662 0 0.000939 Uniform Calculated

Table 6.

Model input parameters for no drug wastage scenario.

Parameters Unit Baseline Deterministic SA
Probabilistic SA
Assumptions
Low High PSA (SD) Distribution
Medical visit
Physician fees Every 3 weeks 8.15 6.11 10.19 1.01875 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Acquisition cost of treatments
Loading dose pertuzumab (840 mg) 1st week of treatment only 4564.42 2282.21 6846.63 1141.105 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Maintenance dose pertuzumab (420 mg) Every 3 weeks starting from week 4 2282.21 1141.11 3423.32 570.5525 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Loading dose trastuzumab (8mg/kg) - 1st week of treatment only 1955.79 977.89 2933.68 488.9465 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Maintenance dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) Every 3 weeks starting from week 4 1466.84 733.42 2200.26 366.7099 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Docetaxel (1 mg) Every 3 weeks for 6 cycles 760.88 380.44 1141.33 190.2211 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Pegfilgrastim (6 mg) Every 3 weeks for 6 cycles 662.68 331.34 994.02 165.67 Gamma 50% +/− rule
TDM1 Every 3 weeks 3754.05 1877.02 5631.07 938.5124 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Capecitabine (500 mg) Assuming 2 weeks of treatment per cycle + 1 week rest 158.27 79.14 237.41 39.5675 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Lapatinib (1500 mg daily) Weekly 684.18 342.09 1026.27 171.045 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Cost of the management of Adverse Events (grade 3/4)
Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 1 time 6628.784 3351.325 15468.774 3029.362 Gamma Calculated
Trastuzumab + docetaxel 1 time 4749.982 2411.924 11520.075 2277.038 Gamma Calculated
T-DM1 1 time 2347.695 1166.942 4626.3412 864.8498 Gamma Calculated
Lapatinib + capecitabine 1 time 601.4326 297.29 1160.6912 215.8503 Gamma Calculated
Trastuzumab + lapatinib 1 time 321.70 158.9764 619.84961 115.2183 Gamma Calculated
Trastuzumab + capecitabine 1 time 976.6843 519.1815 1954.2796 358.7745 Gamma Calculated
Cost of Computed tomography (CT) scan Every 9 weeks 142.8571 107.1429 178.57143 17.85714 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Laboratory tests
Cost of blood work Every 3 weeks 6.27 4.7025 7.8375 0.78375 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Cost of echocardiogram Every 13 weeks 119.05 89.2875 148.8125 14.88125 Gamma 25% +/− rule
Cost of palliative care/End of life 1 time 7185.721 3592.86 10778.581 1796.43 Gamma 50% +/− rule
Utilities
Progression-free under treatment 0.785746 0.484478 0.9346889 0.112553 Beta Calculated
Treatment response 0.061 0.025215 0.0742449 0.012257 Beta Calculated
Disease progression under treatment 0.538 0.195937 0.8475389 0.162901 Beta Calculated
Disutilities
Disease progression −0.248 −0.28854 −0.0871499 −0.050348 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel −0.05553 −0.09841 −0.0156854 −0.02068 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for trastuzumab + docetaxel −0.03953 −0.05795 −0.0112224 −0.011682 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for TDM1 −0.00851 −0.01246 −0.0024128 −0.002512 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for lapatinib + capecitabine −0.01826 −0.03193 −0.00395 −0.006996 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for trastuzumab + lapatinib −0.01716 −0.02629 −0.00425 −0.005509 Uniform Calculated
Adverse events for trastuzumab + capecitabine −0.04017 −0.0747 −0.0092301 −0.016367 Negative Beta/Uniform Calculated
Shape and scale parameters
OS shape (Gamma)
OS shape for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + Docetaxel 0.543696 0.460437 0.6420112 0.09264 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.576501 0.501151 0.6631802 0.082668 Gamma Regression
OS shape for TDM1 0.474333 0.414168 0.5432391 0.065853 Gamma Regression
OS shape for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.464784 0.356733 0.605561 0.126953 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.588267 0.467906 0.7395881 0.138613 Gamma Regression
OS shape for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.451302 0.33817 0.6022825 0.134751 Gamma Regression
OS scale (Lambda)
OS scale for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.019241 0.016447 0.0225107 0.003094 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.024996 0.021942 0.028476 0.003334 Gamma Regression
OS scale for TDM1 0.032557 0.029043 0.0364946 0.003802 Gamma Regression
OS scale for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.015981 0.0126 0.0202686 0.003912 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.018985 0.015258 0.0236232 0.004268 Gamma Regression
OS scale for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.040966 0.032984 0.0508812 0.009131 Gamma Regression
PFS shape (Gamma)rowhead
PFS shape for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.621872 0.560543 0.6899112 0.066004 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.555381 0.504406 0.6115074 0.054643 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for TDM1 0.610611 0.55205 0.6753828 0.062925 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.516163 0.422877 0.6300273 0.105689 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for trastuzumab + Lapatinib 0.553842 0.480821 0.637952 0.080169 Gamma Regression
PFS shape for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.508397 0.410262 0.6300055 0.112114 Gamma Regression
PFS scale (Lambda)
PFS scale for pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.052051 0.046527 0.0582304 0.005971 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.074128 0.067234 0.081729 0.007396 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for TDM1 0.104256 0.093296 0.116504 0.011841 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for lapatinib + capecitabine 0.03389 0.027966 0.0410695 0.006685 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for trastuzumab + lapatinib 0.082315 0.069929 0.0968932 0.013757 Gamma Regression
PFS scale for trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.115186 0.093703 0.1415951 0.024435 Gamma Regression
Weekly probability of developing adverse events
Pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.002564 0.001282 0.0038466 0.000641 Beta Calculated
Trastuzumab + docetaxel 0.001969 0.000984 0.0029528 0.000492 Beta Calculated
TDM1 0.004039 0.00202 0.0060591 0.00101 Beta Calculated
Lapatinib + capecitabine 0.0105 0.00525 0.0157506 0.002625 Beta Calculated
Trastuzumab + Lapatinib 0.001941 0.000971 0.0029122 0.000485 Beta Calculated
Trastuzumab + capecitabine 0.005766 0.002883 0.0086493 0.001442 Beta Calculated
Discount rate – weekly 0.000662 0 0.000939 Uniform Calculated

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

All costs presented were direct medical costs from the perspective of the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Administration (TNHIA). Cost for physician visits, treatments, CT scans, and laboratory tests were obtained from the website of TNHIA and personal communication. Most HER-2 targeted treatments are dosed based on weight or body surface area (BSA), so the treatment costs were then calculated based on the average height and weight for the Taiwanese female population. The average height and weight were obtained from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Department of Statistics in Taiwan. Two cost strategies were developed—with drug wastage and without drug wastage. In the drug wastage scenario, the price per vial for each intravenous drug was not broken down. For example, the calculated dosage for docetaxel is 119.25 mg, the total costs for 1 vial of 80mg plus the cost for 2 vials of 20 mg which equals to 120 mg will represent the costs for 119.25.

mg docetaxel. However, in the no drug wastage scenario, the price per vial for each intravenous drug was broken down. For example, the calculated dosage for docetaxel is 119.25 mg and the costs for 1.49 vial of 80mg docetaxel will represent the costs for 119.25mg docetaxel. Cost of palliative care was obtained from Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database.

Transition probabilities for progression and mortality were obtained from published clinical trials. Individual patient data (IPD) were obtained from the PFS and OS Kaplan-Meier curves from these clinical trials using a method described previously. Five standard parametric distributions were fitted to the IPD: exponential, Weibull, Gompertz, lognormal, and log-logistic. The log-logistic model was then selected and used to reconstructed IPD and derived equations for transition probabilities using the shape and scale parameters of the fitted model because it had the greatest model fit which was evaluated based on AIC and BIC. Utilities were obtained from published literature and clinical trials.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to reviewers for their insightful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References


Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES