Abstract
Background
In Ethiopia, approximately three-fourths of mothers do not deliver in health facilities. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth fallouts in underutilization of institutional delivery that upshots maternal morbidity and mortality. Thus, the ambition of this study was to assess respectful maternity care and associated factors in Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia.
Methods
A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 01 to July 01, 2017. A total of 425 women, delivered at Harar town hospitals, were nominated using a systematic random sampling technique. A pretested and organized questionnaire was used to collect the data. After checking for completeness, the data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 22.0 for cleaning and analyses. Both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was computed to identify factors associated with respectful maternity care. Statistical significance was declared at a P-value of < 0.05.
Results
Data were collected on 425 women. Overall, only 38.4% (95% CI: 33.7, 42.0%) of women received respectful maternity care. Delivering at private hospitals [AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.25, 4.07], having ANC follow-up [AOR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.10, 3.20], planned pregnancy [AOR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.24, 7.34], labor attended by male provider [AOR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.77] and normal maternal outcome [AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.13, 4.83] were significantly associated with respectful maternity care.
Conclusions
Only four out of ten women received respectful care during labor and delivery. Providing women-friendly, abusive free, timely and discriminative free care are the bases to improve the uptake of institutional delivery. Execution of respectful care advancement must be the business of all healthcare providers. Furthermore, to come up with a substantial reduction in maternal mortality, great emphasis should be given to make the service woman-centered.
Keywords: Respectful maternity care, Disrespect, Abuse, Harar, Ethiopia
Background
Although there is a momentous reduction, maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is still 239 and 12 per 100,000 live births in developing and developed countries respectively [1]. Regardless of an enlightened improvement in maternal and child health services in Ethiopia; nearly three-fourths of mothers do not deliver in health facilities and do not attend by skilled birth attendants (SBA). Moreover, the MMR is still 412/100,000 live births [2]. This figure is very far from the target under the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) by 2030, which is < 70/100,000 [3]. Absence of companion during labor, substandard maternity service, long waiting time to receive care, and disrespect and abuse during childbirth are some of the factors that contribute to the underutilization of facility delivery [4–7].
Respectful maternity care (RMC) during childbirth is an interaction between the client and the healthcare providers (HCPs) or facility conditions. It has a significant role in MMR reduction by enhancing clients’ inclination to deliver in health facilities [8–13]. Furthermore, RMC is the standard of care for all women [14] that encompasses women’s basic human rights [9, 15].
In spite of every woman’s right to get the highest achievable standard of care, many women experience disrespect and abusive treatment. Disrespect and abuse (D&A) are often multi-factorial and perceived differently and sometimes it may be considered as normal depending on the context [15–18]. Browser and Hill identified seven categories of disrespect which include: physical abuse, non-consented clinical care, non-confidential care, non-dignified care, discrimination based on specific patient attributes, abandonment of care, and detention in facilities [9].
Maternal health experts and concerned stakeholders agreed that D&A in facility-based childbirth are causes of suffering for women, the barrier to skilled care utilization and often a violation of women‘s human rights [9]. In addition, a growing body of the literature showed that any childbearing woman that faces D&A results in poor maternal and neonatal outcome [19].
D&A breaks the trust between women and HCPs and may deter women from accessing healthcare services [20]. Abusive free care is not well realized in many parts of the world [21]. Evidence from India, Tanzania, Kenya, and Ethiopia showed that the status of RMC ranges from 21 to 80%. Delivering at night time, private health facilities, cesarean delivery, continuous emotional support during labor, intention to use the facility, assurance of privacy and high economic status were some of the factors associated with RMC [7, 22–25].
Promoting institutional delivery without the implementation of RMC may paradoxically increase maternal mortality [26]. Reevaluating women’s childbirth experience is indispensable to fascinate women with facility delivery [27, 28]. Despite many published evidence about the individual cases of D&A, there is a scantiness of proof concerning the prevalence estimate of RMC in facility-based childbirth; particularly there is a scarceness of evidence in Eastern Ethiopia. Hence, this study was aimed to assess the status of RMC and associated factors at Harar town hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia.
Methods
Study setting, design and period
A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 01 to July 01, 2017, at Harar town hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia. Harar is found 526 km away from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. In view of the 2007 Census projection, the all out populace of the Harari region was 232,000, of which female records 115,230 [29]. Harar town had 19 kebeles (most minimal regulatory unit) separated into six districts. In the town, there were seven hospitals (2 open, 2 private, 1 Nongovernmental (NGO) and 2 different hospitals), 8 health centers and 26 health posts. The antenatal care (ANC), health facility delivery and SBA coverage of the Region reach 75.9, 50.2, and 51.2% respectively [2].
Study population
Women who visited the nominated Harar hospitals for labor and delivery throughout the information assortment period were included. Women who were fundamentally sick, and unfit to impart were excluded from the study.
Sample size determination and sampling procedure
A single population proportion formula was used, to determine the minimum adequate sample for this study, with the following assumptions: P = 0.214 (proportion of women who received respectful and abusive free care in Addis Ababa) [7], 95% degree of certainty, 4% margin of error and 5% contingency. In view of the above suppositions, the final sample size was 425. Four out of seven hospitals were chosen (i.e. Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital (HFSUH), Jugal, Yemage and Harar General hospital) purposively dependent on administration arrangement to people in general and arrangement of essential obstetrics and infant care. At that point, the sample was apportioned relatively to every hospital by investigating the number of deliveries in the earlier year. The information was gathered from every other postnatal woman until the anticipated sample was accomplished.
Data collection tool
A pretested and organized questionnaire was sorted out from previous literature. The instrument was first arranged in English and converted into nearby dialects (i.e. Amharic and Afaan Oromo) and back to English by free language specialists. The tool incorporates socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics, companion during labor, length of hospital stay, and RMC assessment items. The Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP) developed 23 items in seven categories of D&A as part of the RMC tool kit [30]. However, this tool is not validated in the context of developing countries including Ethiopia. Hence, the level of RMC was assessed using 15 validated items in the Ethiopian context. The tool had four categories with verification items (i.e. friendly care by 7 items, abusive free care using 3 items, timely care using 2 and discrimination-free care using 3 items). The items have a good internal correlation (Cronbach’s alpha (α) of 0.857) and adequate reliability (α = 0.845) [31]. In addition, the tool was pretested on 5% of the sample and alteration was done preceding the beginning of the genuine information assortment.
Data collectors and data collection procedure
Four qualified diploma birthing assistance experts who were conversant in local dialects and didn’t work in the investigation settings were enlisted for information assortment. The information assortment was directed in an institution based discharge interview using an organized questionnaire regulated poll. Women who satisfy the consideration criteria and ready to partake were met in a private setting after discharge from the postnatal ward. Supervision was carried out on a daily basis throughout the study period.
Study variables and measurements
Respectful maternity care refers to care organized for and provided to all women in a manner that maintains their dignity, privacy, and confidentiality, ensures freedom from harm and mistreatment and enables informed choice and continuous support during labor and childbirth [32]. RMC, which is a composite variable of four constructs: friendly, abusive free, timely and discrimination-free care was the dependent variable. The level of RMC was assessed using a five-point Likert scale ([1] strongly disagree to [5] strongly agree) questionnaires. The overall cutoff-point for RMC was determined based on previous studies and those participants who encountered D&A for at least one of the 15 items were categorized as “disrespected” [7]. The socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics, companion during labor, and length of hospital stay were the independent variables for this study.
Data quality assurance
The instrument was pretested on 20 postnatal women at HFSUH one month preceding the actual information assortment. A 2-days preparation covering both hypothetical and commonsense parts of information assortment was held. Close supervision was done consistently all through the investigation time frame. Double data entry was done on 5% of the sample to guarantee the consistency of the entered information.
Data processing and analysis
After checking completeness, the data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 statistical software. Then, the data were exported to SPSS version 22.0 for cleaning and analysis. During analysis, the reactions of ‘strongly agree’ and ‘agree’ were classified as “Yes” (received RMC) and reactions of ‘strongly disagree’, ‘disagree’ and ‘neutral’ as “No” (disrespected and abused) for positive statements. Those contrarily articulated statements were categorized in the turnaround heading as “strongly disagree” and “disagree” categorized as “Yes” and the reaction of “neutral”, “agree” and “strongly agree” categorized as “No”. Descriptive summary measures such as frequency, percentages, mean and standard deviation were used to describe characteristics of the participants. Binary logistic regression was carried out to identify the factors associated with RMC. To control possible confounding factors, variables with a p-value of ≤0.25 in the bivariate analysis were taken to the multivariable analysis. Multicollinearity and model fitness was checked using standard error and Hosmer-Lemeshow test respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), was used to identify the independent variables associated with RMC. Statistical significance was declared at a P-value of < 0.05.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics
In this study, 425 women were involved, with a response rate of 100%. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 27 (±6.0) years. Among the participants, 48% were within the age group of 25–34 years, 63.0% were Oromo by ethnicity, 80.9% were muslims, 98.6% were married and 79.3% were housewives. Of the participants, 39.5% were uneducated and 51.3% were from urban settings (Table 1).
Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants at Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (N = 425)
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | < 25 | 152 | 35.8 |
| 25–34 | 204 | 48.0 | |
| ≥35 | 69 | 16.2 | |
| Ethnicity | Oromo | 268 | 63.0 |
| Harari | 112 | 26.4 | |
| Amhara | 29 | 6.8 | |
| Othera | 16 | 3.8 | |
| Religion | Muslim | 344 | 80.9 |
| Orthodox | 76 | 17.9 | |
| Protestant | 5 | 1.2 | |
| Marital status | Married | 419 | 98.6 |
| Otherb | 6 | 1.4 | |
| Level of education | Unable to read and write | 168 | 39.5 |
| Able to read and write | 50 | 11.8 | |
| Primary | 99 | 23.3 | |
| Secondary | 63 | 14.8 | |
| College and above | 45 | 10.6 | |
| Occupation | Housewife | 337 | 79.3 |
| Merchant | 39 | 9.2 | |
| Government employee | 26 | 6.1 | |
| Non-government employee | 15 | 3.5 | |
| Otherc | 8 | 1.9 | |
| Residence | Urban | 218 | 51.3 |
| Rural | 207 | 48.7 | |
aTigray, Gurage, Somali; bwidowed, separated, single; cstudent, daily laborer
Obstetrics characteristics
More than two-thirds (68%) of women were multipara. Three hundred three (71%) of women had ANC follow-up for the current pregnancy; of them, 58% had four ANC visits and above. Of the participants, 38% came to the hospital through referral and pregnancy was planned for 89% of women. Labor was not attended by a companion for 79% of women and half (49.9%) of the participants were attended by female HCPs. Episiotomy was done for 32% of the participants. Among the participants, 53% were delivered through spontaneous vaginal delivery followed by instrument-assisted delivery (25%). Childbirth ends up without an impediment for 87% of the clients (Table 2). Of the participants, 82.4% were enthusiastic to recommend and visit the facility in the future (Fig. 1).
Table 2.
Obstetrics characteristics of study participants at Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (N = 425)
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parity | Primipara | 136 | 32.0 |
| Multipara | 289 | 68.0 | |
| Antenatal care follow-up | Yes | 303 | 71.3 |
| No | 122 | 28.7 | |
| Place of ANC follow-up (n = 303) | Health center | 221 | 73.6 |
| Hospital | 82 | 26.4 | |
| Number of ANC visit (n = 303) | < 4 | 233 | 76.9 |
| ≥ 4 | 70 | 23.1 | |
| Reason to deliver in the hospital | Planned | 265 | 62.4 |
| Referred | 160 | 37.6 | |
| Status of current pregnancy | Planned | 379 | 89.2 |
| Unplanned | 46 | 10.8 | |
| Companion during labor | Yes | 89 | 20.9 |
| No | 336 | 79.1 | |
| Episiotomy | Yes | 134 | 31.5 |
| No | 291 | 68.5 | |
| Length of labor (In hours) | < 12 | 266 | 62.6 |
| ≥ 12 | 159 | 37.4 | |
| Sex of labor attendant | Male | 213 | 50.1 |
| Female | 212 | 49.9 | |
| Mode of delivery | SVD | 224 | 52.7 |
| Instrumental assisted | 106 | 24.9 | |
| Cesarean section | 95 | 22.4 | |
| Maternal outcome | Normal | 370 | 87.1 |
| With complication | 55 | 12.9 | |
| Length of hospital stay | ≤ 24 h | 305 | 71.8 |
| > 24 h | 120 | 28.2 |
Fig. 1.
Women’s willingness to visit again and recommend Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (N = 425)
Status of respectful maternity care
Overall, only 38.4% (95%; CI: 33.7, 42.0%) of the women received RMC. Among the participants, ~ 45% received discriminative free care (Fig. 2). Of the participants, 17.6% didn’t receive information about pain relief measures and 16.5% complained that HCPs did not show any concern and empathy. One-third (33.2%) of women reported that the HCPs did not respond to their needs. A significant number (14.8%) of women complained that some HCPs shouted at them during childbirth. Nearly, one-fifth (18.6%) were insulted due to the presence of a birth companion and personal attributes (Table 3).
Fig. 2.
Status of respectful maternity care by categories at Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (N = 425)
Table 3.
Categories and types of respectful maternity care reported by women during childbirth in Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (N = 425)
| Categories of respectful and abusive free care | Items of respectful and abusive free care | Yes, N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Friendly care | I felt that healthcare workers cared for me with a kind approach. | 368 (86.8) |
| Healthcare workers treated me in a friendly manner. | 369 (86.8) | |
| The healthcare providers were talking positively about pain and relief. | 350 (82.4) | |
| The health worker showed his/her concern and empathy. | 355 (83.5) | |
| All healthcare workers treated me with respect as an individual. | 354 (83.3) | |
| The healthcare workers speak to me in a language that I can understand. | 374 (93.9) | |
| The healthcare providers called me by my name. | 357 (84.0) | |
| Abusive free care | The healthcare workers responded to my needs whether or not I asked. | 284 (66.8) |
| Some healthcare providers slapped me during delivery for different reasons. | 48 (11.3) | |
| Some health workers shouted at me because I haven’t done what I was told to do. | 63 (14.8) | |
| Timely care | I was kept waiting for a long time before receiving services. | 53 (12.5) |
| Service provision was delayed due to the health facilities’ internal problem). | 69 (16.2) | |
| Discrimination-free care | Some of the health workers do not treat me well because of some personal attribute. | 57 (13.4) |
| Some health workers insulted me and my companions due to my personal attributes. | 79 (18.6) | |
| I was allowed to practice cultural rituals in the facility. | 235 (55.3) |
Factors associated with respectful maternity care
After controlling confounding using multivariable analysis five variables: delivering at a private hospital, having ANC follow-up, planned pregnancy, labor attended by male providers, and normal maternal condition after delivery were significantly associated with RMC. The odds of RMC were 2 times [AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.25, 4.07] higher among women who delivered at private hospitals as compared to women who delivered in public hospitals. The odds of RMC were almost 2 times [AOR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.10, 3.20] higher among women who had ANC follow-up. Likewise, planned pregnancy increases the odds of RMC by three-fold [AOR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.19, 6.92]. The odds of RMC were two times [AOR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.77] higher among women attended by male providers as compared to women whose labor attended by female providers. Moreover, the odds of RMC were 2 times [AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.13, 4.83] higher among women whose childbirth process ends up without complications (Table 4).
Table 4.
Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression result for factors associated with respectful maternity care in Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (N = 425)
| Variables | Respectful Maternity Care | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes N (%) | No N (%) | |||
| Place of delivery | ||||
| Public hospital | 127 (35.0) | 236 (65.0) | 1 | 1 |
| Private hospital | 36 (58.1) | 26 (41.9) | 2.6 (1.49, 4.45) | 2.3 (1.25, 4.07)a |
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 97 (44.5) | 121 (55.5) | 1.7 (1.15, 2.55) | 1.1 (0.63, 2.0) |
| Rural | 66 (31.9) | 141 (68.1) | 1 | 1 |
| Educational status | ||||
| No formal education | 73 (33.5) | 145 (66.5) | 0.7 (0.46, 1.18) | 1.2 (0.62, 2.12) |
| Primary | 46 (46.5) | 53 (53.5) | 1.3 (0.73, 2.19) | 1.6 (0.87, 2.93) |
| Secondary and above | 44 (40.7) | 64 (59.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Parity | ||||
| Primipara | 60 (44.1) | 76 (55.9) | 1.4 (0.94, 2.16) | 1.3 (0.80, 2.02) |
| Multipara | 103 (35.6) | 186 (64.4) | 1 | 1 |
| Antenatal care visit | ||||
| Yes | 133 (43.9) | 170 (56.1) | 2.4 (1.50, 3.84) | 1.8 (1.10, 3.2)a |
| No | 30 (24.6) | 92 (75.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Status of pregnancy | ||||
| Planned | 156 (41.2) | 223 (58.8) | 4.0 (1.70, 8.94) | 2.9 (1.19, 6.92)a |
| Unplanned | 7 (17.5) | 39 (84.8) | 1 | 1 |
| Reason to deliver here | ||||
| Planned | 112 (44.4) | 140 (55.6) | 1.6 (1.04, 2.36) | 1.5 (0.86, 2.43) |
| Referred | 51 (29.5) | 122 (70.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Sex of the health care provider | ||||
| Male | 91 (42.7) | 122 (57.3) | 1.5 (0.98, 2.15) | 1.8 (1.14, 2.77)a |
| Female | 72 (34.0) | 140 (66.0) | 1 | 1 |
| Maternal condition after delivery | ||||
| Normal | 151 (40.8) | 219 (59.2) | 2.5 (1.26, 4.84) | 2.3 (1.13, 4.83)a |
| With complication | 12 (21.8) | 43 (78.2) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Presence of birth companion | ||||
| Yes | 38 (42.7) | 51 (57.3) | 1.3 (0.78, 2.02) | 1.3 (0.80, 2.22) |
| No | 125 (37.2) | 211 (62.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
a Statistically significant at P < 0.05
Discussion
This study revealed that 45, 58, 60 and 76% of women received discriminative free, abusive free, friendly and timely care respectively. Overall, 38% of women received RMC. Delivering at a private hospital, having ANC follow-up, planned pregnancy, labor attended by male providers, and normal maternal condition after delivery were significantly associated with RMC.
In this study, merely 38.4% of women received RMC. This finding is higher than the study conducted in Addis Ababa (21%) [7] and lower than the studies conducted in public hospitals of Ethiopia (66%), Bahir Dar, Ethiopia (57%), Uttar Pradesh, India (43%), Tanzania (85%), and Kenya (80%) [22, 24, 25, 33, 34]. This incongruity may be due to study period variation, participant’s level of understanding about the service, educational and socio-economic status of the participants, service quality, and the ability of participants to report D&A. Likewise, it may be due to the normalization of D&A, client flow, sociocultural difference, and adherence of hospitals with women-friendly amenities.
Delivering at private hospitals is associated with RMC. Women who were delivered at private hospitals were two times higher to report, the service as reverential and cordial. This is likely due to the fact that in private hospitals, services are relatively luxurious and reachable to those of a higher wealth index. As a result, there is less chance of congestion with more concentrating service delivery due to the lower healthcare provider to patient ratio.
Attending the recommended ANC follow-up is linked with women’s pleasure in a study conducted in southern Ethiopia [5]. Similarly, in this study women who had ANC follow-up increase the odds of RMC by two-fold. The probable reason may be due to the client’s adaptation with the services and close relations with the HCPs during the ANC follow-up, which is crucial in building confidence in the service provided in the facility.
Evidence showed that the desired pregnancy upsurges women’s level of contentment and recognize the service provided in hospitals as reverential [35]. Correspondingly, in this study planned pregnancy increases the odds of RMC by three-fold. The possible reason may be, as pregnancy is desired and intentional; the mother receives continuous emotional support from her husband and families, which improves the outcome of childbirth. In addition, utilization of maternal health services also increased that helps her to be familiarized with the service providers, reduce depression and increase the mother’s attitude to perceive the care as courteous.
Labor attended by male HCPs is associated with RMC. The odds of RMC were two times higher among women whose labor attended by male providers. This finding is in line with the study conducted at public hospitals of Ethiopia in which, male HCPs were more likely to engage in the implementation of RMC [25]. This is challenging to explain but it might be due to the natural inclination to opposite-sex rather than the quality of care provided.
Normal maternal condition after childbirth was associated with RMC. The odds of RMC were two-fold higher among women whose childbirth process ends up without complications as compared to their counterparts. This is aligned with the studies conducted in Ethiopia [24, 36]. This could be due to the fact that those women who faced difficulties during labor are highly risky to develop post-partum blues and depression. In addition, those mothers who develop complications are admitted and stayed for an extended period of time without the full support of the families. Besides, they may feel that they develop such complications due to the poor quality of the service and perceive the service as offensive.
Despite the study follows scientific methodological approaches rigorously, it may have the following limitations: since the data were collected within the hospital environment there may be social desirability bias and fear of reporting abusive care. To minimize this bias, the data were collected in a private room within the hospital setup. The other limitation is that meanwhile the data were collected in the early postpartum period some women were fatigue to respond some questions.
Conclusion
In general, only four out of ten women received RMC. Delivering at private hospitals, having ANC follow-up, planned pregnancy, labor attended by male providers, and normal maternal conditions were significantly associated with RMC. Providing a women-friendly, abusive free, timely and discriminative free care are the pillars to improve the low uptake of institutional delivery in Ethiopia. Hence, the involvement of multidisciplinary stakeholders is needed to deliver respectful and compassionate care for childbearing mothers. Furthermore, great emphasis should be given to make the service client-centered. Further large-scale community-based studies supplemented with qualitative data are needed to identify the barriers of RMC.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Haramaya University, College of Health and Medical Sciences for letting us to conduct this study. Our deepest gratitude also goes to healthcare providers working in Harar hospitals, data collectors, supervisors and study participants for their invaluable support to make this study real.
Abbreviations
- ANC
Antenatal Care
- D&A
Disrespect and Abuse
- HCPs
Health Care Providers
- MMR
Maternal Mortality Ratio
- RMC
Respectful Maternity Care
Authors’ contributions
AB designed the study, involved in data collection, done analysis and interpretation of the results, drafted the paper, and participated in preparing all versions of the manuscript. KT, BS, and AM assisted in the design and proposal development, monitored data collection, assisted during analysis and revised subsequent drafts of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ information
Agegnehu Bante (BScN, MSc in Maternity and Neonatal Nursing), Department of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. Kedir Teji (BScN, MSc in Biostatistics and Epidemiology, PhD in Food and Nutritional Sciences), School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia
Berhanu Seyoum (BSc, MSc in Medical Microbiology, PhD in Public Health and Epidemiology), Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Abera Mersha (BScN, MSc in Maternity and Neonatal Nursing), Department of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical clearance was obtained from Haramaya University, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Institutional Health Research Ethical Review Committee (IHRERC). Sufficient explanations about the study and support letter was given for each hospital administrators. Moreover, this study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [37], and participants were informed about the objectives of the study. Furthermore, written informed consent was obtained from each study participant before the commencement of the actual data collection. To maintain the confidentiality of information gathered from each study participant, code numbers were used throughout the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank, United Nations Population Division . The Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). Levels and Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2015. New York: UNICEF; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland: CSA and ICF; 2016.
- 3.Sachs Jeffrey D. From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2206–2211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tesfaye R, Worku A, Godana W, Lindtjorn B. Client satisfaction with delivery care service and associated factors in the public health facilities of Gamo Gofa zone, Southwest Ethiopia: in a resource limited setting. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016;2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Dewana Z, Fikadu T, Mariam AG, Abdulahi M. Client perspective assessment of women’s satisfaction towards labour and delivery care service in public health facilities at Arba Minch town and the surrounding district, Gamo Gofa zone, South Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2016;13:11. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0125-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bhutta Z, Salam R, Lassi Z, Austin A, Langer A. Approaches to improve quality of care (QoC) for women and newborns: conclusions, evidence gaps and research priorities. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl 2):S5. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Asefa A, Bekele D. Status of respectful and non-abusive care during facility-based childbirth in a hospital and health centers in Addis Ababa. Ethiopia Reprod Health. 2015;12:33. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0024-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sacks E, Kinney MV. Respectful maternal and newborn care: building a common agenda. Reprod Health. 2015;12:46. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0042-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth. Boston: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health; 2010.
- 10.Bhattacharyya S, Srivastava A, Roy R, Avan BI. Factors influencing women’s preference for health facility deliveries in Jharkhand state, India: a cross sectional analysis. BMC Pregnancy and childbirth. 2016;16(1):50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Bhattacharya S, Sundari Ravindran TK. Silent voices: institutional disrespect and abuse during delivery among women of Varanasi district, northern India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1970-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bhattacharyya S, Issac A, Rajbangshi P, Srivastava A, Avan BI. "Neither we are satisfied nor they"-users and provider's perspective: a qualitative study of maternity care in secondary level public health facilities, Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:421. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1077-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bishanga Dunstan, Massenga Joseph, Mwanamsangu Amasha, Kim Young-Mi, George John, Kapologwe Ntuli, Zoungrana Jeremie, Rwegasira Mary, Kols Adrienne, Hill Kathleen, Rijken Marcus, Stekelenburg Jelle. Women’s Experience of Facility-Based Childbirth Care and Receipt of an Early Postnatal Check for Herself and Her Newborn in Northwestern Tanzania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(3):481. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Rashidian A, Nogueira Pileggi V, et al. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG: An Inter Journal Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;125(8):932-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful maternity care: The universal rights of childbearing women. Washingto: White Ribbon Alliance; 2011.
- 16.Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Tuncalp O, Fawole B, Titiloye MA, Olutayo AO, et al. Mistreatment of women during childbirth in Abuja, Nigeria: a qualitative study on perceptions and experiences of women and healthcare providers. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0265-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharma G, Penn-Kekana L, Halder K, Filippi V. An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0668-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.WHO. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: WHO; 2014. WHO/RHR/14.23; 2018.
- 20.WHO. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. World Health Organization, 2014.
- 21.United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights . Technical guidance on the application of a human rights-based approach to the implementation of policies and programmes to reduce preventable maternal morbidity and mortality [A/HRC/21/22] New York: United Nations; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, Spiegelman D, Lyatuu G, Mwanyika-Sando M, et al. The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2016;16(1):236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Abuya T, Ndwiga C, Ritter J, Kanya L, Bellows B, Binkin N, et al. The effect of a multi-component intervention on disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015;15(1):224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Wassihun B, Zeleke S. Compassionate and respectful maternity care during facility based child birth and women’s intent to use maternity service in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Sheferaw ED, Bazant E, Gibson H, Fenta HB, Ayalew F, Belay TB, et al. Respectful maternity care in Ethiopian public health facilities. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0323-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Austad K, Chary A, Martinez B, Juarez M, Martin YJ, Ixen EC, et al. Obstetric care navigation: a new approach to promote respectful maternity care and overcome barriers to safe motherhood. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0410-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Holt K, Caglia JM, Peca E, Sherry JM, Langer A. A call for collaboration on respectful, person-centered health care in family planning and maternal health. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0280-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rosen HE, Lynam PF, Carr C, Reis V, Ricca J, Bazant ES, et al. Direct observation of respectful maternity care in five countries: a cross-sectional study of health facilities in east and southern Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:306. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0728-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Population Census Commission. Summary and Statistical Report of the 2007 Population and Housing Census Results. Addis Ababa. 2008.
- 30.Reis V, Deller B, Catherine Carr C, Smith J. Respectful maternity care. Washington DC: USAID; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sheferaw ED, Mengesha TZ, Wase SB. Development of a tool to measure women’s perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0848-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.WHO Reproductive Health Library. WHO recommendation on respectful maternity care. (February 2018). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- 33.Sudhinaraset M, Treleaven E, Melo J, Singh K, Diamond-Smith N. Women's status and experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in Uttar Pradesh: a mixed methods study using cultural health capital theory. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1124-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Abuya T, Warren C, Miller N, Njuki R, Ndwiga C, Maranga A. Exploring the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bazant ES, Koenig MA. Women’s satisfaction with delivery care in Nairobi’s informal settlements. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(2):79–86. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tayelgn A, Zegeye DT, Kebede Y. Mothers’ satisfaction with referral hospital delivery service in Amhara region, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.World Medical A World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.