Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;25(2):e223–e230. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0382

Table 4.

Delay or dose‐reduction of everolimus

Event POC group (n = 82), n (%) C group (n = 87), n (%) p valuea
Treatment suspension .079
Yes 37 (45.1) 51 (58.6)
No 45 (54.9) 36 (41.4)
Risk difference (95% CI) −13.5 (−28.4 to 1.4)
Dose reduction of everolimus treatment due to oral mucositis .135
Yes 18 (22.0) 28 (32.2)
No 64 (78.0) 59 (67.8)
Risk difference (95% CI) −10.2 (−23.5 to 3.1)
Treatment suspension or dose reduction .059
Yes 42 (51.2) 57 (65.5)
No 40 (48.8) 30 (34.5)
Risk difference (95% CI) −14.3 (−29.0 to 0.4)

graphic file with name ONCO-25-e223-g006.jpg

a

Chi‐squared test.

Abbreviations: C, control; CI, confidence interval; POC, professional oral care.