Skip to main content
NCBI home page
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2019 Nov 26;2019:8053706. doi: 10.1155/2019/8053706

Calpain Small Subunit 1 Protein in the Prognosis of Cancer Survivors and Its Clinicopathological Correlation

Shubin Tang 1, Qiushi Yin 2, Fangteng Liu 3,✉, Yi Zhang 4,✉
PMCID: PMC7012277  PMID: 32083121

Abstract

Background/Aims. Calpain small subunit 1 (Capn4) is implicated in tumorigenesis and plays a key role in multiple tumors. This study aimed to fully illustrate the prognostic value of Capn4 protein in cancer patients.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted against several online databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (ORs) were used to investigate the relationship between Capn4 protein expression and prognosis as well as clinical parameters in cancer survivors.

Results

Eleven studies involving 1775 patients were identified. Overall, the results showed that Capn4 protein was associated with poor prognosis of overall survival (OS) (HR=1.74; 95% CI:1.47-2.01; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07; p<0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR=1.73; 95% CI:1.39-2.07;

Conclusions

Expression of Capn4 protein is associated with cancer survival and clinicopathologic characteristics in patients.

1. Introduction

Calpain small subunit 1 (Calpain-4; CAPNS1; Capn4), as a member of the calpain family of calcium-dependent cysteine proteases, is a small regulatory subunit (28 kDa) [1]. The calpain family is implicated in regulating a series of cellular processes and plays critical roles in human tumors [2–8]. Recently, an increasing number of studies have reported that Capn4 expression was upregulated in cancer tissues and there were correlations between Capn4 level and clinical outcomes in multiple malignancies, such as colorectal, esophageal, and ovarian cancer [9–11]. However, the potential value of Capn4 protein as a biomarker to predict clinical outcomes is still debatable. For example, Wu et al. [10] reported that elevated expression of Capn4 was linked to poor prognosis as well as lymph node metastasis and deeper tumor invasion in esophageal cancer, which was consistent with the results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [12], but no significant association was found between Capn4 protein expression and T stage in gastric cancer [13]. And Cheng et al. [9] found that there was a significant relationship between Capn4 protein expression and TNM staging; however, in non-small cell lung cancer, no significant correlation was observed between Capn4 expression and tumor stage [14].

To date, there is no study that systematically assesses the prognostic and pathological value of Capn4 protein expression in survivors and considering the limited sample size of individual study and inconsistent conclusions. Herein, we performed this meta-analysis with published data to explore the relationship of Capn4 protein expression with prognosis and clinicopathological parameters in human cancers and also provide summative insights into the vital roles of Capn4 in tumor prognosis and progression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy and Study Selection

Relevant articles were searched from several databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library up to May 10, 2018. The following search terms and key-words were used in combination: “calpain small subunit 1” or “CAPNS1” or “CANP” or “CDPS” or “CANPS” or “Capn4” or “Calpain-4”, “cancer” or “tumor” or “neoplasm” or “carcinoma”. Publication language was limited to English. Two authors independently performed the literature retrieval and any disagreements were resolved by discussion together.

In this meta-analysis, all eligible studies had to meet the following selection criteria: (1) studies detected the Capn4 protein expression in human cancer tissue; (2) the relationships between Capn4 protein expression and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) were reported; (3) the hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer survival were available; (4) all cases were divided into two groups (H/P and L/N groups) according to the Capn4 protein expression.

The following studies were excluded: (1) those on hematologic malignancies; or animal experiments; or only focused on Capn4 mRNA expression, (2) reviews, editorials, and abstracts, and (3) duplicate articles.

2.2. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

The following data was extracted by two authors, independently: first author's name, publication year, country, number of patients, number of cases in H/P and L/N group, judgement standards for H/P expression, outcome measures, detection methods, analytical methods, and HRs with their 95 % CIs for cancer prognosis. The main clinicopathological features were also extracted from eligible studies: gender, histological grade, depth of tumor invasion, venous invasion, lymph node metastasis (LNM), distant metastasis (DM), and clinical stage. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality assessment [15, 16]. A study with NOS scores ≥6 was considered as “high-quality” [16, 17].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

In this meta-analysis, STATA statistics software (Version 12.0) and RevMan 5.3 software were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs, respectively. DFS, PFS, and RFS were merged as event-free survival (EFS) [18, 19]. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by the Q-statistic test and I2 statistic test, and two different models were selected according to the heterogeneity level; if there was significant heterogeneity (PQ < 0.1 or/and I2>50%), then the random-effects model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effects model was applied for nonsignificant heterogeneity. The visible plot and Begg's test were used to assess the potential publication bias, and the robustness of pooled data was assessed by sensitivity analysis omitting each one study sequentially. A p< 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Eligible Studies and Basic Characteristics

According to the selection criteria, eleven studies [9–14, 20–24] were finally included into this meta-analysis, all included studies were retrospective studies from China, and a total of 1775 patients were recruited in this work. The sample size varied from 91 to 323. All studies detected the Capn4 protein expression in tissue samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) method, and several evaluation criteria were applied among these studies, including by the extent of stained cells or the area of positive tumor cells or by multiplying the ratio of positive cells score and the intensity score. The detailed evaluation criteria for these studies were listed in Table 1. All included studies investigated the relationships between Capn4 protein expression and cancer survival, including 11 studies for OS, 1 covered DFS, 2 reported RFS, and 3 reported PFS. For calculating the pooled HRs of Capn4 protein, DFS, PFS, and RFS were integrated into the meta-analysis of EFS, and the follow-up time in all cohort studies was equal or more than 5 years. As for cancer types, 8 different kinds of cancers were investigated, including colorectal cancer (CRC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), ovarian cancer (OC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), glioblastoma (GBM), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The procedure of the literature search is shown in Figure 1. Main characteristics of included studies are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of eligible studies in this meta-analysis.

Author, Year Cancer type Total number Calpain-4 protein expression Judgment standards for high Capn4 expression Outcome measures Follow-ups Analysis HR (95%CI) for OS HR (95%CI) for DFS/PFS/RFS NOS
H/P L/N
Cheng F, 2018 CRC 132 87 45 Each specimen was scored for the extent of stained cells (0-1% = 0, 1~24% =1, 25~49% =2, 50~74% =3, 75~100% =4). A value ≥2 as a high score. OS, DFS ≥5 years UVA 1.91 (1.21-2.78) 1.85 (1.12-2.39) 6
Wu XX, 2018 ESCC 155 105 50 The final score was obtained by multiplying the ratio of positive cells score and the intensity score, and a final score of 8-12 was classified as high expression. OS ≥5 years MVA 1.68 (1.05-3.97) NR 7
Yang MF, 2018 OC 113 60 53 The final scores of Capn4 expression,
ranging from 0 to 9, were calculated by multiplying the percentage score by the intensity score. A final score of ≥4 was classified as high expression.		 OS, PFS ≥5 years MVA 2.16 (1.09-3.14) 2.04 (1.28-3.27) 7
Yang X, 2017 OC 91 68 23 The staining index was evaluated by multiplying the score of staining intensity and the percentage of positive tumor cells, samples with an SI ≥8 were defined as showing high expression. OS ≥5 years UVA 1.62 (1.10-2.37) NR 6
Peng P, 2016 GC 174 102 72 Composite expression scores = 4 (intensity score−1) + frequency score.
CES of calpain-4 greater than or equal to 6 were considered to be high expression.		 OS ≥5 years MVA 1.98 (1.16-3.38) NR 8
Zhang C, 2013 ICC 140 80 60 Capn4 high: the mean area of positive
staining>50% of the tumor section.		 OS, RFS ≥5 years MVA 1.66 (1.12-2.46) 1.49 (1.01-2.21) 7
Zheng PC, 2014 NPC 153 72 61 The scores of 0, 1-2, 3-4, and 5-6 were considered to be negative, low, medium, and strong, respectively. The scores of 5–6 were considered to be high. OS, PFS ≥5 years UVA 1.56 (1.04-3.01) 1.63 (1.11-3.08) 7
Gu J, 2015 NSCLC 208 111 97 The intensity of Capn4 was classified into four grades (0 for negative; 1 for weak; 2 for moderate; and 3 for strong). Scores of 2 or 3 were considered Capn4 high. OS ≥5 years MVA 1.53 (1.04-2.25) NR 8
Bai DS, 2009 HCC 192 70 122 The final score of each sample was assessed by summarizing the result of intensity and extent of staining. The case was considered positive if the final score was
4 to 5 (+) or 6 to 7 (++).		 OS, RFS ≥5 years MVA 4.07 (2.52-6.55) 46.95 (13.96-157.93) 8
Cai JJ, 2014 GBM 94 52 42 A positive reaction for Capn4 was classified into four grades (0 for negative; 1 for weak; 2 for moderate; and 3 for strong). The moderate or strong intensity was classified as high Capn4 expression. OS, PFS ≥5 years MVA 1.54 (1.00-2.06) 1.83 (1.17-2.85) 6
Dai Z, 2014 HCC 323 161 162 NR OS ≥5 years MVA 1.87 (1.35-2.60) NR 8
Open in a new tab

CRC: colorectal cancer; ESCC: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; OC: ovarian cancer; ICC: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; GBM: glioblastoma; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; IHC: immunohistochemistry; H/P: high/positive expression; L/N: low/negative expression; OS: overall survival; DFS: disease-free survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival; PFS: progression-free survival; UVA: univariate analysis; MVA: multivariate analysis; SI: staining index; CES: composite expression scores; NR: not reported.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flow diagram of included studies for the meta-analysis.

3.2. Capn4 Protein and OS

As presented in Figure 2(a), the fixed-effects model was applied for no significant heterogeneity existed (I2 = 0.0%; PQ = 0.665); the pooled HR value of OS merged in the eleven eligible articles was 1.73 with the corresponding 95% CI 1.50-1.96 and p < 0.05, suggesting that high level of Capn4 protein, as a prognostic factor of cancer survivors, indicated a shorter OS. Furthermore, the prognostic values of Capn4 protein were also confirmed in several subgroups (Figures 2(b)–2(d), Table 2). Interestingly, the Capn4 protein could be an independent predictor for OS in cancers (HR=1.74; 95% CI:1.47-2.01).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of Capn4 protein and overall survival (OS). (a) Overall; (b) by sample size; (c) by cancer types; (d) by analysis methods.

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of the association between Capn4 protein expression and OS.

Subgroup factor Divided standard No. of studies Pooled HR p-value Heterogeneity
(95% CI) I2 (%) PQ
Sample size ≥ 150 6 1.78(1.42-2.14) <0.001 17.0 0.304
  < 150 5 1.69(1.39-1.99) <0.001 0.0 0.833
Cancer type GI cancers 6 1.89(1.53-2.24) <0.001 1.0 0.410
  Non-GI cancers 5 1.61(1.31-1.92) <0.001 0.0 0.871
Analysis method MVA 8 1.74(1.47-2.01) <0.001 2.7 0.409
  UVA 3 1.70(1.26-2.14) <0.001 0.0 0.813
Open in a new tab

GI: Gastrointestinal; UVA: univariate analysis; MVA: multivariate analysis; HR: hazard ratios.

3.3. Capn4 Protein and Event-Free Survival (EFS)

As shown in Figure 3, no heterogeneity existed for values of I2 = 0.0% and PQ = 0.744, and the combined HR value of the EFS rate was 1.73 with the corresponding 95% CI:1.39-2.07 and p < 0.05 after being merged in the six included studies, indicating that high level of Capn4 protein may lead to an inferior EFS in cancer patients.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of Capn4 protein and event-free survival (EFS).

3.4. Capn4 Protein and Clinicopathological Characteristics

The pooled ORs for Capn4 protein and clinicopathological relevance are presented in Figures 4(a)–4(g) and Table 3. No significant associations were observed between Capn4 protein and gender (OR=1.09; 95% CI: 0.86-1.39; Figure 4(a)) and histological grade (OR=1.16; 95% CI: 0.90-2.23; Figure 4(b)). However, increased expression level of Capn4 protein was significantly related to deeper tumor invasion (OR= 4.17; 95% CI: 1.42-12.27; Figure 4(c)), venous invasion (OR=2.34; 95% CI: 1.07-5.13; Figure 4(d)), and high rate of metastases (LNM: OR= 2.74; 95% CI: 1.98-3.79; Figure 4(e); DM: OR=4.02; 95% CI: 2.14-7.57; Figure 4(f)) and advanced clinical stage (OR=2.87; 95% CI: 1.94-4.26; Figure 4(g)).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of Capn4 protein and clinicopathological features: (a) gender; (b) histological grade; (c) depth of tumor invasion; (d) venous invasion; (e) lymph node metastasis; (f) distant metastasis; (g) clinical stage.

Table 3.

Results of the meta-analysis of Capn4 protein and clinicopathological features.

Parameters Studies Number of cases OR (95% CI) p-value Heterogeneity
(n) I2 (%) PQ Model
Gender
(Male vs. Female)		 9 1571 1.09(0.86-1.39) 0.47 0.0 0.60 Fixed
Histological grade
(G3/G4 vs. G1/G2)		 7 1283 1.16(0.90-2.23) 0.25 19 0.29 Fixed
Tumor depth
(T3-4 vs. T1-2)		 3 482 4.17(1.42-12.27) 0.01 82 0.004 Random
Venous invasion
(+ vs. -)		 4 821 2.34(1.07-5.13) 0.03 83 0.0005 Random
LNM (+ vs. -) 5 768 2.74(1.98-3.79) <0.001 9 0.36 Fixed
DM (+ vs. -) 3 440 4.02(2.14-7.57) <0.001 31 0.23 Fixed
Clinical stage
(III-IV vs. I-II)		 8 1213 2.87(1.94-4.26) <0.001 54 0.03 Random
Open in a new tab

LNM: lymph node metastasis; DM: distant metastasis; OR: odds ratio.

3.5. Publication Bias

Begg's plots were shown in Figures 5(a)-5(b); the results of Begg's tests indicated no significant publication bias in this meta-analysis (OS: Pr > |z| = 0.119 (continuity corrected); EFS: Pr > |z| = 0.452 (continuity corrected)).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Publication bias assessment for OS (a) and EFS (b).

3.6. Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis was performed (Figures 6(a)-6(b)) and confirmed the robustness of the pooled results.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity analysis for OS (a) and EFS (b).

4. Discussion

Despite great progress in supervision and treatment strategies in recent decades, the long-term prognosis of malignant tumors remains disappointing [25–27]. On the other hand, to classify the patients with a high possibility of tumor recurrence and predict the probable clinical outcome could significantly help to timely initiate intervention and select optimized treatment plans [26, 27]. Thus, it is essential to identify effective tumor markers associated with progression and survival to improve the prognosis of cancer survivors.

Our data indicated that the expression of Capn4 protein was closely related with the survival of cancer patients. In this meta-analysis, eleven studies with 1775 patients were enrolled to assess the prognostic value of OS in cancer survivors, and the combined data showed that high expression level of Capn4 protein was significantly associated with the poor long-term OS. Particularly, the Capn4 protein could be a valuable prognostic factor of OS in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and also might serve as an independent factor for OS in cancers. Meanwhile, the data from six studies with a total of 824 cases were also combined to investigate the relationship between Capn4 protein and EFS, and Capn4 protein was suggested to be a useful prognostic indicator for EFS.

There are some clues that might help to explain why Capn4 could predict the survival of cancer patients as well as the tumor progression. Many scholars presented that Capn4 was frequently highly expressed in cancer tissues and tumor cell lines [23, 24, 28]. Accumulating evidence supports that Capn4 acts as an oncogene in various human cancers, such as ovarian carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and liver cancer, and the elevated expression of Capn4 also indicates malignant biological behaviors in tumors [20–23]. Capn4 plays an important role in the occurrence and progression of cancers. Capn4 knockdown could significantly inhibit tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, Capn4 upregulation could enhance cell growth, metastasis, and tumor transformation [23–25, 29]. What is more important, it is reported that Capn4 is involved in tumor progression through many pathways, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), the FAK–Src signaling pathways, the Wnt/β-catenin (β-catenin), and the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling pathways [24, 30–32]. Additionally, Capn4 also correlates with drug response and tumor resistance and might serve as a potential therapeutic target for several kinds of tumors [13, 14, 33, 34].

To further assess the clinical relevance of Capn4 protein, we also linked it to clinicopathological characteristics of cancers. The pooled data showed that the overexpression of Capn4 protein was significantly associated with deeper tumor invasion, venous invasion, positive nodal status, and distant tumor metastasis. The patients with high expression Capn4 protein were more likely to have an advanced tumor stage. All the results showed that Capn4 predicted worse pathological features, which was consistent with the OS/EFS analysis.

Overall, Capn4 exhibited the powerful clinical usefulness of Capn4 as a promising biomarker in cancer survivors, and the results of this cumulative meta-analysis provided a clue toward understanding the potential clinical utility of Capn4 as an unfavorable predictor as well as a new therapeutic target in cancers. The Capn4 protein expression in patient samples could be determined by the IHC, a widely used and robust primary technique, which could make our findings translating into clinical applications more easily. Certainly, the measurement of the expression of Capn4 protein should be verified with an established standard manipulation procedure, including consistent sample processing and incubation time, and the IHC evaluation criteria also need to be unified. In addition, more researches that explore the mechanism of the role of Capn4 in cancers are required to draw major clinical conclusions.

In the current study, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the total sample size and included studies were relatively small, and only eleven studies were included with 1775 patients. Second, studies from other countries should be included in the future, the patients enrolled in this work were all from China, and this might limit our results applicable to other ethnics. Third, all studies included were retrospectively designed. Fourth, the clinical potential of Capn4 protein in certain specific cancers needed further investigation. Fifth, the heterogeneity was also observed in the quantified synthesis, especially for the relationship between Capn4 expression and invasion depth, venous invasion, and clinical stage. Finally, the standards for Capn4 protein overexpression in tissues varied in these studies.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides meaningful statistical evidence supporting the important prognostic significance of Capn4 in cancer survivors. It demonstrates the associations between high Capn4 expression and poor clinical outcomes for cancer patients. Large-scale studies with high-quality from multicenter are needed to verify the clinical application of Capn4 protein as a prognostic marker in cancers.

Contributor Information

Fangteng Liu, Email: 9354694@gmail.com.

Yi Zhang, Email: 3455647525@qq.com.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors' Contributions

Shubin Tang and Qiushi Yin contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Saez M. E., Ramirez-Lorca R., Moron F. J., Ruiz A. The therapeutic potential of the calpain family: new aspects. Drug Discovery Therapy. 2006;11(19-20):917–923. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kashiwagi A., Schipani E., Fein M. J., Greer P. A., Shimada M. Targeted deletion of Capn4 in cells of the chondrocyte lineage impairs chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2010;30(11):2799–2810. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00157-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shimada M., Greer P. A., McMahon A. P., Bouxsein M. L., Schipani E. In vivo targeted deletion of calpain small subunit, Capn4, in cells of the osteoblast lineage impairs cell proliferation, differentiation, and bone formation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283(30):21002–21010. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M710354200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tan Y., Wu C., De Veyra T., Greer P. A. Ubiquitous calpains promote both apoptosis and survival signals in response to different cell death stimuli. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(26):17689–17698. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601978200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tan Y., Dourdin N., Wu C., de Veyra T., Elce J. S., Greer P. A. Ubiquitous calpains promote caspase-12 and JNK activation during endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(23):16016–16024. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m601299200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Potz B. A., Abid M. R., Sellke F. W. Role of calpain in pathogenesis of human disease processes. Journal of Nature and Science. 2016:p. e218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moretti D., Del Bello B., Allavena G., Maellaro E. Calpains and cancer: Friends or enemies? Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2014;564:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Storr S. J., Thompson N., Pu X., Zhang Y., Martin S. G. Calpain in breast cancer: role in disease progression and treatment response. Pathobiology. 2015;82(3-4):133–141. doi: 10.1159/000430464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cheng F., Mohanmed M. M., Li Z., et al. Capn4 promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation by increasing MAPK7 through activation of the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway. Experimental Cell Research. 2018;363(2):235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu X. X., Zhang H. D., Chen C. G., et al. High expression of Capn4 is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2018;11:765–772. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang M. F., Lou Y. L., Liu S. S., et al. Capn4 overexpression indicates poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. Journal of Cancer. 2018;9(2):304–309. doi: 10.7150/jca.22004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zheng P., Chen X., Zhu H., et al. Capn4 is a marker of poor clinical outcomes and promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis via nuclear factor-κB-induced matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression. Cancer Science. 2014;105(6):630–638. doi: 10.1111/cas.12416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 13.Peng P., Min L., Song S., et al. Elevated expression of calpain-4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17(10) doi: 10.3390/ijms17101612.E1612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gu J., Xu F. K., Zhao G. Y., et al. Capn4 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression via upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase 2. Medical Oncology. 2015;32(3):p. 51. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0500-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu F., Dong Q., Huang J. Overexpression of LncRNA PVT1 predicts advanced clinicopathological features and serves as an unfavorable risk factor for survival of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;43(3):1077–1089. doi: 10.1159/000481719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhu Z. M., Liu F. T., Chen X. Low expression of LncRNA cancer susceptibility candidate 2 and its clinical significance in cancer tissues. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;46(4):1643–1649. doi: 10.1159/000489211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu F. T., Gao H., Wu C. W., Zhu Z. M. The association of plasma fibrinogen with clinicopathological features and prognosis in esophageal cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8(54):93029–93038. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liang R. F., Li J. H., Li M., Yang Y., Liu Y. H. The prognostic role of controlling nutritional status scores in patients with solid tumors. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2017;474:155–158. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xia Q., Liu J., Wu C., et al. Prognostic significance of (18)FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a meta-analysis. Cancer Imaging. 2015;15(1):p. 19. doi: 10.1186/s40644-015-0055-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang X., Sun J., Xia D., et al. Capn4 enhances osteopontin expression through activation of the wnt/β-catenin pathway to promote epithelial ovarian carcinoma metastasis. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;42(1):185–197. doi: 10.1159/000477310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang C., Bai D. S., Huang X. Y., et al. Prognostic significance of Capn4 overexpression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054619.e54619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bai D. S., Dai Z., Zhou J., et al. Capn4 overexpression underlies tumor invasion and metastasis after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009;49(2):460–470. doi: 10.1002/hep.22638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cai J. J., Qi Z. X., Hua W., et al. Increased expression of Capn4 is associated with the malignancy of human glioma. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2014;20(6):521–527. doi: 10.1111/cns.12248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dai Z., Zhou S. L., Zhou Z. J., et al. Capn4 contributes to tumour growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by activation of the FAK-Src signalling pathways. The Journal of Pathology. 2014;234(3):316–328. doi: 10.1002/path.4395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Coleman M. P. Cancer survival: global surveillance will stimulate health policy and improve equity. The Lancet. 2014;383(9916):564–573. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62225-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Allemani C., Coleman M. P. Public health surveillance of cancer survival in the United States and worldwide: The contribution of the CONCORD programme. Cancer. 2017;123:4977–4981. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang X., Zang H., Luo Y., et al. High expression of USP22 predicts poor prognosis and advanced clinicopathological features in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. OncoTargets and Therapy. 2018;Volume 11:3035–3046. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S148662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cai J. J., Qi Z. X., Chen L. C., Yao Y., Gong Y., Mao Y. miR-124 suppresses the migration and invasion of glioma cells in vitro via Capn4. Oncology Reports. 2016;35(1):284–290. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hhu H., Wang G., Lli C. miR-124 suppresses proliferation and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by targeting Capn4. OncoTargets and Therapy. 2017;10:2711–2720. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S135563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shen J., Zhuang Q. F., Chen Z., et al. Capn4 induces human renal cancer cell proliferation by activating NF-κB signaling pathway through FAK phosphorylation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2017;10:7466–7474. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang E., Wang D., Li B., et al. Capn4 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human melanoma cells through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Oncology Reports. 2017;37(1):379–387. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shi B., Wang Y., Yin F. MALAT1/miR-124/Capn4 axis regulates proliferation, invasion and EMT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Biology & Therapy. 2017;18(10):792–800. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1373214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kulkarni S., Saju L., Farver C., Tubbs R. Calpain4 is required for activation of HER2 in breast cancer cells exposed to trastuzumab and its suppression decreases survival and enhances response. International Journal of Cancer. 2012;131(10):2420–2432. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li J., Xu J., Yan X., Jin K., Li W., Zhang R. Suppression of Capn4 by microRNA-1271 impedes the proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2018;99:162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES