Acute toxicity of benzalkonium chloride in Balb/c mice following intratracheal instillation and oral administration

Abstract

Benzalkonium chloride is a cationic surfactant widely used as a disinfectant, preservative, and sanitizer in many public places as well as domestically. The purpose of this study is to compare the acute toxicity of lethal doses (LD_x) and the target organs after intratracheal instillation and oral ingestion by mice, which is a preliminary test prior to the repeated dose toxicity test. When Balb/c mice were treated with a single dose of benzalkonium chloride via oral administration, LD₅₀ was 241.7 mg/kg. However, it was comparatively decreased to 8.5 mg/kg following intratracheal treatment, which suggests that lung may be the main target of toxicity. Although the histopathology showed inflammatory responses in the lung after intratracheal instillation, it still did not confirm that the inflammatory responses were the key factors inducing death in the treated animal. Acute and fatal mechanisms such as bronchoconstriction or neurotoxicity associated with benzalkonium chloride exposure should be further investigated.

INTRODUCTION

Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) are a group of cationic substances that are widely used in industrial and household products including disinfectants, preservatives, and detergents. Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) is one of the most frequently used QACs known to cause toxic effects on the skin, eyes, and the airways [1,2]. A few medicines contain low concentrations of BAC (0.007–0.01%) as preservative or stabilizers while many disinfectants often contain higher concentrations of BAC (0.01–80%). Some disinfectants are readily usable (0.01–0.2%), but most products are usually commercially available as 10% BAC for use after dilution. In Japan, products for hospital use contain up to 50% to 80% BAC [3]. Therefore, accidental or suicidal ingestion of BAC may frequently result in serious poisoning. Unintended inhalation of the chemical in closed cleaning rooms or other places has been reported in many countries, including a number of reports of accidental exposure to BAC, resulting in death or a serious injury [4-6]. A previous study demonstrated that BAC may increase the immune response in mice, which may increase the risk of allergy. Inhalation of higher concentrations of BAC induced intense pulmonary effects and inflammation. However, it may not be the cause of death because inflammatory response was not fatal in those studies [7,8].

The purpose of this study is to compare the acute toxicity of lethal doses(LD_x) after intratracheal instillation and oral administration of BAC to Balb/c mice, prior to testing for toxicity to repeated dose exposure. Histological analysis of lung and liver was also performed to determine the fatal effects of damage to the target organs.

METHODS

BAC was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Cat No; 12060-100G, St. Louis, MO, USA). Six-week-old male Balb/c mice were obtained from Young-Bio (Gyunggi-do, Korea) and acclimatized to laboratory conditions for one week before the initiation of the experiment. The average body weight of the animal before BAC treatment was about 20 ± 2 g. Diet and water were provided ad libitum. The animal facility was maintained at 23 ± 3°C with a 12 h light/dark cycle (light on from 8:00 to 20:00 h). Six mice were held in a cage and treated with BAC via intratracheal instillation or oral administration. BAC was solubilized in saline and treated with doses of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg. A total of 0.2 mL was instilled in each mouse, and a similar volume of saline without BAC was used to treat each animal in the control group. For oral administration of BAC, mice were fasted overnight before the experiment. Each of the six mice was treated with doses of 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 mg/kg. After treatment with BAC, mice were monitored for 14 days. All the animals used in this study were treated in accordance with “Guidance for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” and approved by the Committee of Dongduk Women’s University (Approval No; 20181113).

Dead or moribund mice were immediately removed from the cages, followed by post-mortem inspection. Small portions of tissue samples were harvested after death. Tissues were fixed in 10% phosphate buffered formalin via immersion, and embedded in paraffin, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and examined microscopically. Hitopathological analysis was performed as test project of “19-MO-0336N” in Chemon Inc (Suwon, Korea). For each mouse, the observation was made over a period of 14 days, and the toxicity symptoms and mortality rate in each group were noted. Dead animals were counted every 24 h. The LD₅₀ was calculated using the arithmetic method of Karber [9,10].

$$L{D}_{\mathit{50}}=LD\mathit{100}-\sum _{}^{}\left(\mathit{a}\mathit{\times }\mathit{b}\right)\mathit{/}n$$ (1)

where n is the total number of animals in a group,

a is the difference between two successive doses of administered extract/substance,

b is the average number of dead animals in two successive doses, and

LD₁₀₀ is the lethal dose causing 100% death of all the test animals.

RESULTS

50% lethal dose (LD₅₀)

A few mice exposed to BAC treatment were dead immediately after the treatment. The number of dead animals was increased by the increased dose and duration. As shown in Table 1, all the mice were dead after the oral administration of BAC 400 mg/kg within 24 h and none was harmed by exposure to 100 mg/kg by day 14, the end of the experiment. At the dose of 150-300 mg/kg, dose-dependent mortality was observed and the number of dead mice was increased with time. In case of intratracheal instillation of BAC, the lethality was significantly increased. When mice were treated with 30 mg/ kg, all the mice were killed soon after the treatment as shown in Table 1. Five of the six mice were dead within 24 h upon treatment with 20 mg/kg while none of them died following exposure to a dose of 1.25 mg/kg during the 14 days of experiment. The mice that were not dead within 24 h were alive until the end of experiment. Table 2 showed the calculated parameters for the determination of LD₅₀ used in Karber method. The LD₅₀ of BAC in the orally administered group at 24 h post-treatment was 241.7 mg/kg while the LD₅₀ in intratracheally instilled group at the same time was 8.5 mg/kg, which was significantly low compared with oral administration.

Table 1.

Acute toxicity of benzalkonium chloride in mice after treatment via oral administration or intratracheal instillation

Route	Dose (mg/kg)	Exposed duration (d)
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	14
Oral administration	400	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6
	300	5	5	5	6	6	6	6	6
	200	2	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
	150	0	0	2	3	3	3	3	3
	100	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Intratracheal instillation	30	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6
	20	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
	10	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
	5	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
	2.5	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
	1.25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

The accumulated number of dead mice were represented after treatment of benzalkonium chloride at the designated observation period. Total 6 mice were held in a group and treated with benzalkonium chloride.

Table 2.

Parameters for calculation of 50% lethal dose (LD₅₀) using the arithmetic methods of Karber

	Dose (mg/kg)	Dose difference (mg/kg) (a)	Number of dead mice	Mean (b)	Product (a * b)	LD50 (mg/kg)
Oral administration	400	-	6	-	-	241.7
	300	100	5	5.5	550
	200	100	2	3.5	350
	150	50	0	1	50
	100	50	0	0	0
Intratracheal instillation	30	-	6	-	-	8.5
	20	10	5	5.5	55
	10	10	4	4.5	45
	5	5	4	4	20
	2.5	2.5	2	3	7.5
	1.25	1.25	0	1	1.25

Histopathological examination

Histopathological examination of the liver in the mouse treated with BAC orally and via intratracheal instillation did not show any specific lesions. Furthermore, no lung damage was detected when mice were treated via oral administration. However, BAC-related tissue damage was observed in lung tissue of mice treated with intratracheal instillation. Congestion and hemorrhage (diffused), acute alveolar wall injury, and intravascular fibrin thrombus were observed in all the BAC-treated mice (20 mg/kg). The summary of findings involving tissue damage is presented in Table 3. Representative histological findings of lungs from mice treated via intratracheal instillation are shown in Fig.1. Diffuse congestion and hemorrhage, necrotizing alveolar wall and thrombus formation in small vessels and terminal bronchioles are shown.

Table 3.

Summary of the histopathological findings in mice after treatment of benzalkonium chloride

Organ and histopathological findings	Control	Intratracheal (20 mg/kg)	Oral (200 mg/kg)
Liver	2	3	3
No specific lesion	1	3	3
Mononuclear cell foci	1	0	0
Grades: minimal	1	0	0
Lung	2	3	3
No specific lesion	2	0	2
Congestion & Hemorrhage, diffuse	0	3	0
Alveolar wall injury, acute	0	3	0
Fibrin thrombus, intravascular	0	3	1*

The number of mice that have histopathological findings were counted. Bold number represents for the total examined mice. *; focal.

Figure 1.

Histological findings in the lungs of control group (A) and treated group (B) with 20 mg/kg via intratracheal instillation. In treated group, diffuse congestion and hemorrhage, necrotizing alveolar wall and fibrin thrombus in small vessels were observed while no lesion were found in control group. Image A represents for control group (×200, n=3) and those of B represent three respective mice (×400, n=3). b: terminal bronchiole. v: small vessels.

DISCUSSION

BAC is widely used as an active ingredient in household and personal care products in Korea. The products are easily available and many cases of accidental poisoning may have been reported. According to the toxicity data available, BAC may cause adverse effects on eye, skin, and respiratory system [11-13]. However, acute toxicity of BAC, especially inhaled toxicity involving cases of poisoning, has not been adequately reported. The LD₅₀ of BAC in rats was 234-525 mg/kg and 14 mg/kg when administered orally and intravenously, respectively [2]. In humans, an oral dose of 100-400 mg/kg or a parenteral dose of 5-15 mg/kg is thought result in fatal outcomes [3,5]. However, the fatal dose of inhalation or lung burden in case of accidental acute poisoning is unknown.

In this study, the acute toxicity test was performed and the LD₅₀ of intratracheal instillation in Balb/c mice was calculated and compared with that of oral administration. The LD₅₀ at 24 h after intratracheal instillation was 8.5 mg/kg, which was significantly low compared with 241.7 mg/kg via oral administration. The LD₅₀ of oral administration was in the range reported those obtained from rats [2,3].

Histological examination revealed no liver damage in mice after oral administration as well as intratracheal instillation. Intratracheal instillation revealed lung damage; however, no any other pathological findings involving liver were detected. The histological findings involving lung, including diffuse congestion and hemorrhage, necrotizing alveolar wall and fibrin thrombus in small vessels may not be serious nor fatal to the mice, as shown in Table 3 and Fig.1. The direct cause of death in mice treated with acute high dosage of BAC could not be determined easily. It was reported that BAC induced bronchoconstriction in patients with stable bronchial asthma [13]. Thus, serious bronchoconstriction may be one of the major factors inducing death in mice immediately post-treatment. Although inflammatory response and oxidative stress were known to be induced by BAC [14, 15], they were not associated with fatal outcomes. Effects of BAC on bronchoconstriction will be further investigated considering the possibility of neurotoxicity, which may interfere with respiration or cardiac function.