Abstract
Translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) is a multifunctional and highly conserved protein from yeast to humans. Recently, its role in non-selective autophagy has been reported with controversial results in mammalian and human cells. Herein we examine the effect of Mmi1, the yeast ortholog of TCTP, on non-selective autophagy in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a well-established model system to monitor autophagy. We induced autophagy by nitrogen starvation or rapamycin addition and measured autophagy by using the Pho8Δ60 and GFP-Atg8 processing assays in WT, mmi1Δ, and in autophagy-deficient strains atg8Δ or atg1Δ. Our results demonstrate that Mmi1 does not affect basal or nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy. However, an increased rapamycin-induced autophagy is detected in mmi1Δ strain when the cells enter the post-diauxic growth phase, and this phenotype can be rescued by inserted wild-type MMI1 gene. Further, the mmi1Δ cells exhibit significantly lower amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the post-diauxic growth phase compared to WT cells. In summary, our study suggests that Mmi1 negatively affects rapamycin-induced autophagy in the post-diauxic growth phase and supports the role of Mmi1/TCTP as a negative autophagy regulator in eukaryotic cells.
Keywords: Mmi1, TCTP, translationally controlled tumor protein, autophagy, reactive oxygen species, rapamycin, nitrogen starvation
1. Introduction
TCTP (Translationally Controlled Tumor Protein) is an evolutionarily-conserved and abundant protein among eukaryotic organisms. It is an essential protein for the development of multicellular organisms [1,2,3] and its main biological role is likely an anti-apoptotic activity [4,5,6,7]. However, it is also involved in many other core cell biological processes (reviewed in [8]). Despite it being a long time since its discovery in the 1980s [9] and subsequent intensive studies, the protein still remains a bit enigmatic, and new discoveries and new effects are still being described.
Recently, TCTP has also been found to affect autophagy [10,11]. Chen and colleagues reported that TCTP positively affects hypoxia and starvation-induced bulk non-selective autophagy [10]. On the other hand, Bae and colleagues have declared TCTP a negative regulator of basal and rapamycin-induced non-selective autophagy [11]. Since TCTP is an evolutionarily highly conserved protein, we used a pioneer model organism for studying autophagy, budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [12], reviewed in [13,14,15] to test the effect of yeast TCTP on autophagy. The S. cerevisiae is usually batch cultured and its growth in the culture is highly affected by a carbon source. When glucose is added to yeast cells, they rapidly adapt to fermentation of the rich carbon source during a short lag-phase. After the adaptation, they start to ferment the sugar and reach a maximal growth rate. This phase is called the exponential growth phase. Once glucose becomes limiting, yeast cells enter a second lag-phase, known as a diauxic shift [16]. During the diauxic shift yeast cells change their metabolism from fermentation to respiration. The diauxic shift is followed by a slow growing phase (post diauxic growth phase), during which ethanol, acetate, and other fermentation products are utilized by respiration. When the all carbon sources are exhausted yeast cells enter a quiescence or stationary phase (G0) [16,17].
Yeast TCTP was originally described as a translation machinery associated protein, Tma19 [18]. Later, Tma19 was described as a microtubule and mitochondria interacting protein and renamed Mmi1 [19]. Therefore, we refer to the protein as Mmi1 hereafter. Mmi1 is a small 18.7 kDa, acidic (pI = 4.17), and highly abundant protein in exponentially growing yeast cells corresponding to approximately 200,000 molecules per cell [20]. During the post-diauxic growth phase, Mmi1 is still a highly abundant protein exhibiting a steady-state level of expression [21], and its abundance continually decreases in the stationary phase [21,22]. Upon rapamycin treatment, the Mmi1 protein pool decreases [23], indicating that the Mmi1 expression in yeast might be regulated by TOR pathway similarly to higher eukaryotic cells [24]. Further, the mmi1Δ strain exhibits a slow growth phenotype [19], indicating that Mmi1 is a pro-survival factor. Mmi1 is uniformly distributed in cytosol, but if stress is applied, its distribution is changed. Upon mild oxidative stress, Mmi1 translocates to mitochondria [25], while upon heat stress it relocalizes to the nucleus and mitochondria and is also present in stress granules [26]. Mmi1 role in the nucleus is not clarified yet. However, recently Bischof and colleagues suggested a model that the mitochondrial localization of the Mmi1/TCTP is responsible for the clearance of the mitochondrial membrane from harmful proteins in a time of stress [25], thereby protecting cells from apoptosis. Above the anti-apoptotic function, Mmi1 affects a wide range of biological functions and processes most likely through interaction with its binding partners. According to the BioGRID database [27], Mmi1 currently possess about 49 physically interacting protein partners. These proteins are mainly involved in cell cycle, transcription, translation, and protein degradation. Indeed, our previous results indicated that Mmi1 modulates activity of proteasomes [26], the major protein degradation system in all eukaryotic cells next to autophagy. Nevertheless, the effect of Mmi1 on autophagy in yeast cells has not been tested yet. To test the question of whether Mmi1 affects non-selective autophagy, we induced autophagy through different conditions and used independent approaches to monitor the autophagy.
Autophagy (here referred to macroautophagy) occurs constitutively at basal levels, but it is dramatically stimulated by starvation and by various stresses [28,29]. It allows cells to respond to various types of stresses and to adapt to changing nutrient conditions [30]. Autophagy can be either a non-selective self-consumption or a selective consumption of specific cargoes or organelles. The bulk autophagy is completely inhibited in nutrient-rich conditions, but can be induced by shifting cells to starvation medium [31] or by addition of rapamycin [32], a potent inhibitor of TORC1 (target of rapamycin complex 1) [33,34]. During non-selective autophagy a portion of cytosol is sequestered for degradation into double-membrane structures named autophagosomes, which are delivered to the vacuole and degradated by vacuolar hydrolases [35]. In S. cerevisiae, eighteen Atg proteins, Atg1–10, Atg12–14, Atg16–18, Atg29 and Atg31 play essential roles in autophagy, and these core proteins are required for the formation of autophagosomes (reviewed in [15,36]). When non-selective autophagy is induced, the Atg17-Atg29-Atg31 complex act as an essential scaffold that facilitates formation of the preautosomal structure (PAS), from which the autophagosome is generated [37]. Autophagy is involved in a variety of physiological processes. In unicellular eukaryotes it takes care of cellular housekeeping and sustaining viability, and it is also essential for adaptation to a new host and formation of spores [38]. In higher eukaryotes it is important for cell survival and maintenance, and its dysfunction contributes to the pathologies of many diseases, e.g., cancer [39].
Here, we examined the effect of Mmi1 on bulk non-selective autophagy in yeast. Our results demonstrate a negative effect of Mmi1 on rapamycin-induced autophagy in contrast to nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy. Interestingly, the negative effect of Mmi1 on rapamycin-induced autophagy is detected after diauxic shift.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Yeast Strains, Media, and Growth Conditions
Yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Yeast cells were grown in shaking flask at 30 °C in rich medium (YPD; 1% w/v yeast extract, 2% w/v peptone, 2% w/v glucose) or defined synthetic medium (SD; 0.17% w/v yeast nitrogen base, 0.5% w/v ammonium sulfate, 2% w/v glucose, and auxotrophic amino acids as required). Starvation experiments were performed in synthetic minimal medium lacking nitrogen (SD-N; 0.17% w/v yeast nitrogen base without ammonium sulfate and amino acids, 2% w/v glucose).
Table 1.
Strain | Relevant Genotype | Source |
---|---|---|
CRY155 | BY4741; MATa, his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 | [40] |
CRY1107 | BY4741; MATa mmi1::KanMX4 | Euroscarf |
CRY2829 | MATa, leu2–3,112, trp1, ura3–52, pho8::pho8Δ60, pho13::URA3 | [41] |
CRY2830 | MATa, leu2–3,112, trp1, ura3–52, pho8::pho8Δ60, pho13::URA3, atg8::KanMX | [42] |
CRY2833 | MATa, leu2–3,112, trp1, ura3–52, pho8::pho8Δ60, pho13::URA3, mmi1::natNT2 | This study |
CRY2645 | BY4741; MATa [pRS316GFPAut7] | This study |
CRY2673 | BY4741; MATa, mmi1::KanMX4 [pRS316GFPAut7] | This study |
CRY2662 | BY4741; MATa, atg1::natNT2 | This study |
CRY2665 | BY4741; MATa, atg1::natNT2 [pRS316GFPAut7] | This study |
CRY2959 | MATa, leu2–3,112, trp1, ura3–52, pho8::pho8Δ60, pho13::URA3, mmi1::natNT2 pAG32-MMI1 (hphMX6) | This study |
2.2. Plasmids
The pAG32-MMI1 plasmid was constructed by inserting a fragment containing 348 bps upstream of the MMI1 ORF, MMI1 ORF, and 454 bps downstream of MMI1 ORF into the SacI and SpeI sites of the pAG32 plasmid. The fragment was amplified by PCR from pRS316-MMI1 plasmid. Before the transformation of yeast cells, the plasmid was cut with BsaAI restriction enzyme at the position of 319 bps downstream of MMI1 ORF.
The pRS316-MMI1 plasmid was made through PCR cloning. The DNA fragment containing 500 base pairs (bps) upstream of the start codon together with the MMI1 ORF and 500 bps downstream of the ORF were amplified by PCR from WT yeast genomic DNA. The fragment was then ligated into the SacI and EcoRI sites of pRS316 vector, resulting in the pRS316-MMI1 plasmid.
2.3. Phosphatase Assay
Pho8Δ60-expressing strains (WT, mmi1Δ and atg8Δ) were grown in YPD medium to early log phase (OD600 ≈ 0.8) and then shifted to SD-N medium (after double wash with H2O and one wash with SD-N) or rapamycin was added to final concentration 200 nM. The cells were collected at indicated time points, and the alkaline phosphatase activity of Pho8Δ60 was carried out as described previously [41,43,44]. In total, five OD600 equivalents of yeast cells were harvested, washed once with ice-cold water, and once with wash buffer (0.85% w/v NaCl and 1mM PMSF) and resuspended in 500 μL lysis buffer (20 mM Pipes, pH 7.0, 0.5% v/v Triton X-100, 50 mM KCl, 100 mM potassium acetate, 10 mM MgSO4, 10 μM ZnSO4, and 1 mM PMSF). The cells were lysed with 250 μL equivalents of glass beads using a Fast-prep desintegrator 5 times for 20 s at 4 °C and incubated for 2 min on ice in-between. The lysates were centrifuged at 14,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and 100 μL of the supernatant was added to 400 μL reaction buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 0.4% v/v Triton X-100, 10 mM MgSO4, and 1.25 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate). Samples were incubated for 10 min at 30 °C before terminating the reaction by adding 500 μL of stop buffer (2 M glycine, pH 11). Production of p–nitrophenol was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 400 nm (A400) using a spectrophotometer (Helios Gamma Spectrophotometer, Unicam), and the concentration in nmol of p–nitrophenol in the samples was calculated from a standard curve of commercial p–nitrophenol (Sigma) (0 to 100 nmol). Protein concentration in the extracts was measured with the PierceTM BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), and the specific activity was calculated as nmol p–nitrophenol/min/mg protein. The statistical evaluation of phosphatase activity was performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using R software.
2.4. Quantification of Glucose
Yeast cultures were centrifuged, supernatants were collected, and glucose concentration was measured by GLU 500 kit (Erba Lachema s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic) according to the manufactured conditions.
2.5. GFP-Atg8 Processing Assay
BY4741 WT, mmi1∆, and atg1∆ strains transformed with plasmid pRS316_GFPAUT7 [45] carrying GFP-Atg8 were grown in SC medium to OD600 ≈ 0.8 and then shifted to SD-N medium (after double wash with H2O and one wash with SD-N) or rapamycin was added to final concentration 200 nM. In indicated time points, samples were collected and normalized to OD600 ≈ 1 and 100% TCA was added to the final concentration of 12.5%. Samples were frozen at −80 °C for at least 1 h, centrifuged for 5 min at 15,000× g, and pellets were washed with an ice-cold 80% aceton and dried at room temperature. Dried pellets were resuspended in 50 µL of 0.1N NaOH and 1% w/v SDS and bath sonicated. Then 50 µL of 2 × SDS loading buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 4% w/v SDS, 20% v/v glycerol, 0.2% w/v bromphenol blue) with 0.1M DDT was added and the lysates were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Protran nitrocellulose membrane (Sigma-Aldrich/Merck, St. Louis, MO, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% w/v non-fat dried milk (Regilait, Macon, France) and incubated overnight with a mouse monoclonal anti-GFP antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (sc-9996, Santa Cruz, USA) at 1:1000. As a loading control, detection of Pgk1 with anti-Pgk1 antibody (Abcam, ab113687, 1:10000) and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, No: 32430, 1:1000) was used. Proteins were detected by SuperSignalTM West Dura Substrate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). In order to calculate the ratio of free GFP to Pgk1, Western blot signals were detected by G:BOX Chemi-XRQ gel documentary system (Syngene, Cambridge, UK) and quantified by ImageJ program [46].
2.6. Fluorescence Microscopy
Fluorescence microscopy was performed using an Olympus IX-81 inverted microscope equipped with a motorized stage, a 100× PlanApochromat oil-immersion objective (NA = 1.4) and a Hamamatsu Orca-ER-1394 digital camera. Images were processed using Olympus Cell-R™ Xcellence, Adobe CS5 software packages. The same exposure time was used to detect GFP signal in all tested strains. To quantify the cellular distribution of GFP-Atg8 signal, cells were co-stained with a vacuolar marker FM4-64 (1 µg/mL, 1 h, 30 °C) and scored into three categories: vacuole & cytosol, cytosol, and vacuole. In the category “vacuole and cytosol” the GFP signal was evenly distributed within the cells and there were no signal gradients between vacuole and cytosol. In the category “cytosol” the higher GFP signal was detected in cytosol compared to vacuole. Finally, in the category “vacuole” the higher GFP signal was detected in vacuole compared to cytosol. The cells with oversaturated signal were excluded from the quantification.
2.7. Oxygen Radicals’ Measurement by Dihydroethidium Staining
Dihydroethidium (DHE) staining was performed as described in Neklesa and Davis, 2008 [47]. In total 1 × 107 cells/mL were stained with 15 μg/mL of dihydroethidium (DHE) in YPD for 1 h at 30 °C under shacking. Cells were washed in PBS, reinoculated in PBS, and in total 20,000 cells were analyzed in a Flow Cytometer BD LSRII (BD Biosciences, USA). To detect specifically the DHE oxidation product hydroxyethidium, an excitation wavelength of 405 nm was used. This wavelength is the closest available wavelength to a distinct hydroxyethidium excitation maximum of 396 nm that is not present for other DHE oxidation products [48]. The signal was collected by using emission filter 576/26, and cell viability was evaluated by Hoechst 33,258 (1 µg/mL). The data were analyzed by FlowJo software and mean fluorescence DHE intensity values were used to compare the total DHE fluorescence of the strains.
2.8. Viability Assay for Testing Rapamycin Sensitivity
To compare the sensitivity of WT and mmi1∆ strains to rapamycin, we incubated exponentially growing cells in 24 well plate in YPD with 0, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 15 nM of rapamycin. The cells were seeded to initial OD ≈ 0.1 and incubated overnight at 30 °C in EonTM Miroplate Spectrophotometer (BioTek) under agitation. Every 15 min OD600 was determined in each well by Gen5 Microplate Reader and Imager Software. Due to increased concentration of rapamycin were obtained outgrowth curves with a distinct shift in the curves as cells lose viability. For each concentration time shift for OD ≈ 0.5 in the outgrowth curve relative to the curve of untreated cells was determined and viability curves were calculated as described in details in [49].
3. Results
3.1. Basal and Nitrogen Starvation-Induced Autophagy are not Affected by Mmi1
A previous study in mammalian cells indicated that TCTP promotes autophagy under hypoxia and starvation conditions [10]. Later, however, the results were challenged by a study demonstrating TCTP as a negative regulator of non-selective autophagy [11]. To investigate the role of the yeast TCTP ortholog, Mmi1, in non-selective autophagy, we examined autophagy in wild-type (WT) and mmi1Δ cells upon shift to a nitrogen starvation medium that stimulates autophagy induction [12]. As a negative control we used autophagy deficient strains atg8Δ depleted for the key autophagy molecule Atg8 [50]. The non-selective autophagy was determined by the quantitative Pho8Δ60 assay [43]. The Pho8Δ60 assay is an enzymatic assay that utilizes a truncated version of the alkaline phosphatase Pho8Δ60 that lacks the targeting sequence to endoplasmic reticulum, and thus remains in the cytosol. Upon autophagy induction, Pho8Δ60 is delivered to the vacuole, gets activated by the proteolytic cleavage, and serves as a marker of the amount of cytosol delivered through the non-selective autophagy [43]. Yeast strains were grown in the YPD medium until the early logarithmic phase, washed, and shifted to the nitrogen starvation (SD-N) medium. As shown in Figure 1A, at 0 h upon shift to SD-N media low values of the phosphatase activity were detected in all tested strains, indicating that basal levels of autophagy were not affected. Upon prolonged nitrogen starvation, phosphatase activities increased. However, similar values were detected for the WT and the mmi1Δ strains at all tested time points. On the other hand, the control atg8Δ strain exhibited only a low level of autophagy, demonstrating that delivery of Pho8Δ60 to the vacuole depends on autophagy. These results indicated that Mmi1 did not affect the nitrogen starvation-induced non-selective autophagy.
To confirm the results by an independent approach we also performed GFP-Atg8 processing assay [28]. The GFP-Atg8 assay is based on Western blot detection of a free GFP moiety released from a core autophagy protein Atg8 that is resistant to vacuolar proteases [28]. As a negative control we used autophagy deficient atg1Δ depleted for the key autophagy molecule Atg1 [51]. As shown in Figure 1B, no free GFP band was detected by Western blot at 0 h time point of nitrogen starvation in WT, mmi1Δ, and atg1Δ strain demonstrating that basal level of autophagy was not affected in the strains. Upon prolonged nitrogen starvation, similar levels of the free GFP band were detected in the WT and the mmi1Δ cell lysates, indicating that Mmi1 did not influence GFP-Atg8 cleavage upon nitrogen starvation. Further, no free GFP band was detected in the negative control atg1Δ strain at all tested time points, demonstrating that GFP-Atg8 cleavage was dependent on the autophagic degradation. These results, together with the results obtained by the phosphatase assay, demonstrate that the basal and the nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy are not influenced by Mmi1 in yeast S. cerevisiae.
3.2. Mmi1 Negatively Affects Rapamycin-Induced Autophagy When the Cells Enter Post-Diauxic Growth Phase
A previous study on HeLa cells demonstrated a negative effect of TCTP on rapamycin-induced non-selective autophagy [11]. Therefore, we also examined the effect of Mmi1 on autophagy induced by rapamycin, a potent inhibitor of the TOR pathway [33,34] that stimulates autophagy [32]. Yeast cells were grown in rich YPD medium until the early logarithmic growth phase. Autophagy was induced by the addition of rapamycin and determined by the phosphatase assay. As shown in Figure 2A, very low autophagy levels were detected at 0 h after rapamycin addition in all strains, demonstrating consistently with our previous results that the basal autophagy is not affected by Mmi1. After prolonged incubation with rapamycin, autophagy levels increased but no difference between the WT and the mmi1∆ strains was detected 2 and 4 h after the autophagy induction. However, an increased autophagy was detected 18 and 24 h after rapamycin addition to mmi1∆ cells (Figure 2A). Low levels of autophagy were detected in the control atg8∆ cells in all tested time points. These results indicated that rapamycin-induced autophagy was increased in the mmi1Δ strain after a long term incubation with rapamycin.
To corroborate the results, we also performed GFP-Atg8 processing assays. Consistently, similar levels of the free GFP were detected in the WT and mmi1Δ cell lysates at early time points upon autophagy induction, and no free GFP was detected in the control atg1Δ cell lysates at all tested time points (Figure 2B). However, an increased accumulation of the free GFP was detected in the mmi1Δ cell lysate 24 hours after rapamycin addition. The increased GFP-Atg8 processing in mmi1Δ strain 24 hours upon rapamycin addition could be also confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 3). The majority of the GFP-Atg8 signal in the mmi1Δ cells was present in the vacuole compared to WT cells, while in the atg1Δ cells the majority of the GFP signal was present outside of the vacuole (Figure 3A, B). These results, together with the results of the phosphatase assay demonstrate the increased autophagy in the mmi1Δ strain at later time points after rapamycin addition.
To verify that the phenotype seen in the mmi1∆ mutant strain was not due to an unknown secondary mutation, we created a new strain (CRY2959) possessing the wild-type MMI1 gene under control of its endogenous promotor in the mmi1∆ strain. As shown in Figure 4, the presence of MMI1 wild-type gene decreased the autophagy activity of mmi1∆ strain to the WT strain, suggesting that the mutant phenotype is indeed the result of deleting the MMI1 gene.
Our results demonstrated the increased autophagy in mmi1∆ cells after a long-term incubation with rapamycin. However, no similar effect was detected in the case of the nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy. Nitrogen starvation and rapamycin treatment are widely used approaches to induce autophagy in yeast [31,32]. In the nitrogen starvation conditions, yeast cells complete division and arrest in the G1/G2 quiescence state [52], increase their volume due to enlarged vacuole by autophagy induction, and remain viable for two days [12]. Rapamycin treatment is believed to mimic nutrient deprivation, including greatly reduced cell growth [33] and autophagy induction [32]. However, it has been demonstrated independently by several groups that even at high concentration of rapamycin, yeast cells maintain their proliferative ability [47,53,54,55,56]. We used batch cultivation, and cells were grown in rich YPD media to OD600 ≈ 0.8 before rapamycin was added to a final concentration 200 nM, or cells were washed and shifted to nitrogen starvation media. Both approaches induced autophagy as shown earlier (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). Nevertheless, as shown in Figure 5, rapamycin and nitrogen starvation-treated cells highly differed in the cell growth. In nitrogen starvation medium the WT and the mmi1∆ strains reached only OD600 ≈ 2. In fact, the OD600 value in the SD-N medium seems to be overestimated likely due to an increased size of the cells. Indeed, when the number of cells per ml was measured, the increase of about 20% only was detected (Supplementary Figure S1). On the other hand, WT and mmi1∆ strain treated with 200 nM rapamycin exhibited higher growth rates and the cell cultures reached OD600 ≈ 7 after 24 h of cultivation after rapamycin addition. These results demonstrate a striking difference between used nitrogen starvation conditions and rapamycin treatment in batch-cultivated yeast cells. To characterize the cell growth during nitrogen starvation and rapamycin treatment, we measured concentration of glucose in media. As showed in Figure 5B, glucose was still present even 24 h upon the shift to the SD-N media. However, glucose was completely exhausted in the YPD media at latest 15 h after rapamycin addition (Figure 5B). Since S. cerevisiae cultivated in the glucose-containing media undergoes a growth arrest (diauxic shift) after glucose depletion, no presence of glucose in the media demonstrates that the cells have already entered the post diauxic growth phase. To correlate glucose depletion with autophagy induction, we measured phosphatase activity in indicated time points I and II as shown in Figure 5A,B. The time point I represented an exponential phase, where glucose was present in media and the time point II represented the post-diauxic growth phase; where also glucose was absent from the media (Figure 5B). Our results indicate that autophagy is promoted in the mmi1∆ strain after rapamycin treatment, when glucose is already not present in the media (Figure 5C). These results altogether demonstrate that the rapamycin-induced autophagy is increased in the mmi1∆ strain after diauxic shift.
3.3. In Post Diauxic Growth Phase Amount of Superoxide Radicals is Decreased in mmi1∆ Strain
Our results demonstrated that Mmi1 negatively affects the rapamycin-induced autophagy in the post diauxic growth phase. Rapamycin forms a complex with FKBP (Fpr1 in yeast) to inhibit TORC1 [33]. Neklesa and Davis reported that superoxide anions regulate TORC1, and its ability to bind Fpr1:rapamycin complex in S. cerevisiae [47]. According to the authors, elevated levels of superoxide anions modify TORC1 that it is no longer able to fully bind Fpr1:rapamycin complex. To test the possibility that the increased rapamycin-induced autophagy in the mmi1∆ strain results from a lower pool of superoxide anions, we stained the WT and the mmi1∆ cells with dihydroethidium (DHE), a superoxide anions sensitive probe. The exponentially growing cells were treated with rapamycin for 18 h to reach the post-diauxic growth phase, then the cells were labeled with DHE, and analyzed by FACS flow cytometer. As shown in Figure 6, mmi1∆ cells exhibited significantly decreased amount of superoxide anions compared to the WT cells. This suggested that the decreased pool of superoxide anions in mmi1∆ cells might contribute to the stronger interaction between rapamycin/Fpr1 and TORC1 and, hence, it might promote the non-selective autophagy. To further test this hypothesis, we analyzed sensitivity of the WT and the mmi1∆ strains to rapamycin. We assume that the mmi1∆ strain should be more sensitive to rapamycin compared to WT strain if the decreased amount of ROS in mmi1∆ strain facilitate binding of Fpr1:rapamycin complex to TORC1. We cultivated the WT strain and the mmi1∆ strain in the presence of increasing concentrations of rapamycin, and calculated survival curves as described in [49]. As shown in Figure 7, the WT and the mmi1∆ strains exhibited the same sensitivity to rapamycin. These results indicate no correlation between the decreased ROS production and sensitivity to rapamycin in the mmi1∆ strain. This suggests that the decreased ROS production in the mmi1∆ strain likely does not facilitate the Fpr1:rapamycin binding to TORC1.
4. Discussion
As TCTP is a conserved protein from yeast to human and autophagy is a conserved protein degradation pathway, we speculated that examination of the role of yeast TCTP (Mmi1 protein) in autophagy might help us to understand controversial results from higher eukaryotic cells, indicating both positive and negative effects on autophagy [10,11]. Using batch-cultivated yeast cells of S. cerevisiae, we demonstrated that in exponentially growing cells Mmi1 protein had no effect on basal or nitrogen starvation-induced bulk non-selective autophagy (Figure 1). However, if exponentially growing cells were treated with rapamycin, Mmi1 negatively affected autophagy (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4) when the cells entered the post-diauxic growth phase (Figure 5). Further, in the post-diauxic growth phase we detected lower amount of superoxide radicals in mmi1∆ cells compared to WT cells (Figure 6). Our results also indicate that WT and mmi1∆ cells possess same sensitivity to rapamycin (Figure 7).
Previously, Chen and colleagues suggested that mammalian TCTP could positively regulate autophagy. By using African green monkey kidney fibroblast-like cells (COS-7 cells) they demonstrated that TCTP knockdown inhibits autophagy under hypoxic or serum starvation conditions [10]. The effect of hypoxic conditions on autophagy has not been tested in this study and awaits further exploration. However, when the exponentially growing yeast cells were shifted from the rich YPD medium to nitrogen starvation conditions, high autophagy levels were induced but no effect of Mmi1 was detected. These results are consistent with the finding that a very slight or no effect on autophagy was previously detected in response to nutrient starvation condition in the knockdown TCTP human HeLa cell line and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), haploinsufficient in TCTP expression [11].
Further, contrary to a positive role of TCTP on autophagy, Bae and colleagues reported that TCTP/TPT1 negatively regulates autophagy [11]. They detected increased autophagy in HeLa cells transiently transfected with TPT1 shRNA or in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from heterozygote knockout mice embryos (Tpt1+/−). The negative autophagy regulation was potentiated by rapamycin and an increased autophagy was also demonstrated in vivo in livers and kidneys of Tpt1 heterozygote mice [11]. Our results indicate that in yeast cells Mmi1 negatively regulates the rapamycin-induced autophagy (Figure 2 and Figure 3) when glucose is exhausted from media (Figure 5B) and the cells enter post-diauxic growth phase. In contrast, no effect on autophagy is detected under nitrogen starvation condition (Figure 1) when glucose is still present in the medium (Figure 5B).
It is generally accepted that both rapamycin treatment and nitrogen starvation inhibit downstream the TOR signaling pathway that results in repression of protein translation and proliferation and leads to autophagy stimulation [31,32]. However, our results indicate a different effect of Mmi1 on autophagy, based on the used conditions. The rapamycin-induced autophagy might differ from the nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy somewhere within TOR inhibition and/or downstream of TOR signaling that happens during post diauxic growth phase that is not present during nitrogen starvation.
Rapamycin has been thought to fully deactivate the budding yeast TORC1 and driving cells into a quiescent/G0 state [33]. However, this dogma has changed since many groups reported only slowed proliferation upon rapamycin treatment [47,53,54,55] and only partial inhibition of yeast TORC1 [54]. In fact, rapamycin also partially inactivates mammalian mTORC1 [57,58]. It seems evident that maintained proliferative activity upon rapamycin treatment is crucial for detection of increased autophagy induction in mmi1∆ cells in our study. Interestingly, we have noticed that upon rapamycin addition to exponentially growing cells both, the WT and the mmi1∆ strain grow similarly (Figure 5A), and the mmi1∆ strain lost its slow growth phenotype [19]. Since Mmi1 possesses pro-survival activity, we might speculate that during the exponential growth Mmi1 possesses some activity that is directly regulated by TORC1.
Upon rapamycin treatment we detected the increased autophagy in mmi1∆ cells of the post-diauxic growth phase. This phenotype could be rescued by the wild type MMI1 gene inserted into the mmi1∆ strain (Figure 4). At the diauxic shift cells switch from fermentation to respiration and from rapid proliferation to slow proliferation [59]. Further, PKA and TOR pathways are downregulated, and PKC and Snf1 pathways are activated, the former transiently [60], the latter important for the induction of a carbon starvation autophagy in cells undergoing the diauxic shift [61]. Importantly, the carbon starvation autophagy is not induced when the cells are grown in glucose medium, and then shifted to carbon starvation media [61]. It requires an absence of catabolite repression [61] that is responsible for a preferential utilization of glucose to other carbon sources and strict repression of respiration [62]. At the moment the mechanism how Mmi1 negatively affects the rapamycin-induced autophagy in the post-diauxic phase is unknown and awaits a detailed exploration.
However, it has been reported that the reactive oxygen species can hamper inhibitory activity of rapamycin in S. cerevisiae by oxidative damage to yeast TORC1 [47]. Our results indicate that in the post-diauxic growth phase WT cells exhibit a higher amount of reactive oxidative species compared to mmi1∆ cells (Figure 6). Since WT and mmi1∆ cells exhibit the same sensitivity to rapamycin (Figure 7), it seems unlikely that the decreased ROS production in the mmi1∆ strain influences rapamycin binding to TORC1. Further, the reactive oxygen species accumulation was shown to be critical for autophagy induction during nutrient starvation conditions in mammalian cells [63] and a number of studies indicate autophagy regulation by redox signaling [64]. In S. cerevisie, activity of cysteine protease Atg4 could be regulated by the redox state and, hence, it may regulate autophagosome formation [65]. Recently, ethanol stress-induced autophagy was reported to also be regulated by ROS [66].
Here, we used exponentially growing cells and induced autophagy by nitrogen starvation or rapamycin treatment. These approaches were introduced already in 1990s [31,32] and have been used by many groups to trigger autophagy in cells previously grown in the rich YPD medium. Nevertheless, in a natural habitat, cells face large variations in nutrients, and some autophagy roles in cellular metabolism seems to be still unexplored [67]. In this respect, Iwama and Ohsumi recently reported that a bulk autophagy is activated in batch culture on low glucose media based on available carbon sources [68]. Further, Horie and colleagues reported that iron recycling via autophagy is critical for transition from glycolytic to respiratory growth [67]. Several experiments are now in progress to test the effect of Mmi1 on autophagy induced during cell aging and quiescence. So far, our results support the role of Mmi1/TCTP as a negative regulator in the rapamycin-induced non-selective autophagy in eukaryotic cells.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Suresh Subramani for enabling the learning the autophagy methods in his laboratory at the University of California, San Diego, and for helpful discussions. We also thank to Mark Rinnerthaler (University of Salzburg, Austria) and Ivana Malcova for critical comments on the manuscript, Jaroslav Vojta for the help with statistical evaluation of the data, and Lenka Novakova for her technical assistance.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/9/1/138/s1, Figure S1: Growth of WT and mmi1Δ strains in nitrogen starvation media.
Author Contributions
J.V.; designed and performed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript, J.H.; reviewed the manuscript and was responsible for funding acquisition and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the grant from the Czech Science Foundation CSF16-05497S (J.H.) and by the fellowship from J. W. Fulbright Commission (Prague, Czech Republic) (J.V.).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Chen S.H., Wu P.-S., Chou C.-H., Yan Y.-T., Liu H., Weng S.-Y., Yang-Yen H.-F. A Knockout Mouse Approach Reveals that TCTP Functions as an Essential Factor for Cell Proliferation and Survival in a Tissue- or Cell Type–specific Manner. Mol. Boil. Cell. 2007;18:2525–2532. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hsu Y.-C., Chern J.J., Cai Y., Liu M., Choi K.-W. Drosophila TCTP is essential for growth and proliferation through regulation of dRheb GTPase. Nature. 2007;445:785–788. doi: 10.1038/nature05528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu Z.-L., Xu J., Ling L., Zhang R., Shang P., Huang Y.-P. CRISPR disruption of TCTP gene impaired normal development in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2018;26:973–982. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Susini L., Besse S., Duflaut D., Lespagnol A., Beekman C., Fiucci G., Atkinson A.R., Busso D., Poussin P., Marine J.-C., et al. TCTP protects from apoptotic cell death by antagonizing bax function. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1211–1220. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rho S.B., Lee J.H., Park M.S., Byun H.J., Kang S., Seo S.S., Kim J.Y., Park S.Y. Anti-Apoptotic Protein Tctp Controls the Stability of the Tumor Suppressor P53. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li F., Zhang D., Fujise K. Characterization of Fortilin, a Novel Antiapoptotic Protein. J. Boil. Chem. 2001;276:47542–47549. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108954200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang D., Li F., Weidner D., Mnjoyan Z.H., Fujise K. Physical and Functional Interaction between Myeloid Cell Leukemia 1 Protein (MCL1) and Fortilin. J. Boil. Chem. 2002;277:37430–37438. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207413200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bommer U.-A. The Translational Controlled Tumour Protein TCTP: Biological Functions and Regulation. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 2017;64:69–126. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67591-6_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thomas G., Luther H. Transcriptional and translational control of cytoplasmic proteins after serum stimulation of quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1981;78:5712–5716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen K., Huang C., Yuan J., Cheng H., Zhou R. Long-Term Artificial Selection Reveals a Role of TCTP in Autophagy in Mammalian Cells. Mol. Boil. Evol. 2014;31:2194–2211. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bae S.-Y., Byun S., Bae S.H., Min S., Woo H.A., Lee K. TPT1 (tumor protein, translationally-controlled 1) negatively regulates autophagy through the BECN1 interactome and an MTORC1-mediated pathway. Autophagy. 2017;13:820–833. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1287650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tsukada M., Ohsumi Y. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1993;333:169–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Torggler R., Papinski D., Kraft C. Assays to Monitor Autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cells. 2017;6:23. doi: 10.3390/cells6030023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakatogawa H., Suzuki K., Kamada Y., Ohsumi Y. Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: Lessons from yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. 2009;10:458–467. doi: 10.1038/nrm2708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Farré J.-C., Subramani S. Mechanistic insights into selective autophagy pathways: Lessons from yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. 2016;17:537–552. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galdieri L., Mehrotra S., Yu S., Vancura A. Transcriptional Regulation in Yeast during Diauxic Shift and Stationary Phase. OMICS: A J. Integr. Boil. 2010;14:629–638. doi: 10.1089/omi.2010.0069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Swinnen E., Wanke V., Roosen J., Smets B., Dubouloz F., Pedruzzi I., Cameroni E., De Virgilio C., Winderickx J. Rim15 and the crossroads of nutrient signalling pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Div. 2006;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-1-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fleischer T.C., Weaver C.M., McAfee K.J., Jennings J.L., Link A.J. Systematic identification and functional screens of uncharacterized proteins associated with eukaryotic ribosomal complexes. Genome Res. 2006;20:1294–1307. doi: 10.1101/gad.1422006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rinnerthaler M., Jarolim S., Heeren G., Palle E., Perju S., Klinger H., Bogengruber E., Madeo F., Braun R.J., Breitenbach-Koller L., et al. Mmi1 (Ykl056c, Tma19), the Yeast Orthologue of the Translationally Controlled Tumor Protein (Tctp) Has Apoptotic Functions and Interacts with Both Microtubules and Mitochondria. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta. 2006;1757:631–638. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.A Kulak N., Pichler G., Paron I., Nagaraj N., Mann M. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:319–324. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murphy J.P., Stepanova E., Everley R.A., Paulo J.A., Gygi S.P. Comprehensive Temporal Protein Dynamics during the Diauxic Shift in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2015;14:2454–2465. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.045849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Delaney J.R., Murakami C.J., Olsen B., Kennedy B.K., Kaeberlein M. Quantitative evidence for early life fitness defects from 32 longevity-associated alleles in yeast. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:156–165. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.1.14457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chong Y.T., Koh J.L., Friesen H., Duffy S.K., Cox M.J., Moses A., Moffat J., Boone C., Andrews B.J. Yeast Proteome Dynamics from Single Cell Imaging and Automated Analysis. Cell. 2015;161:1413–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bommer U.A., Iadevaia V., Chen J., Knoch B., Engel M., Proud C.G. Growth-Factor Dependent Expression of the Translationally Controlled Tumour Protein Tctp Is Regulated through the Pi3-K/Akt/Mtorc1 Signalling Pathway. Cell. Signal. 2015;27:1557–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bischof J., Salzmann M., Streubel M.K., Hasek J., Geltinger F., Duschl J., Bresgen N., Briza P., Haskova D., Lejskova R., et al. Clearing the outer mitochondrial membrane from harmful proteins via lipid droplets. Cell Death Discov. 2017;3:17016. doi: 10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rinnerthaler M., Lejskova R., Groušl T., Stradalova V., Heeren G., Richter K., Breitenbach-Koller L., Malínský J., Hasek J., Breitenbach M. Mmi1, the Yeast Homologue of Mammalian TCTP, Associates with Stress Granules in Heat-Shocked Cells and Modulates Proteasome Activity. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stark C., Breitkreutz B.-J., Reguly T., Boucher L., Breitkreutz A., Tyers M. BioGRID: A general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D535–D539. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cheong H., Klionsky D.J. Chapter 1 Biochemical Methods to Monitor Autophagy-Related Processes in Yeast. Methods Enzymol. 2008;451:1–26. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang X., Li S., Liu Y., Ma C. Redox Regulated Peroxisome Homeostasis. Redox Biol. 2015:104–108. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yorimitsu T., Klionsky D.J. Autophagy: Molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1542–1552. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Takeshige K., Baba M., Tsuboi S., Noda T., Ohsumi Y. Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction. J. Cell Boil. 1992;119:301–311. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.2.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Noda T. Tor, a Phosphatidylinositol Kinase Homologue, Controls Autophagy in Yeast. J. Boil. Chem. 1998;273:3963–3966. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.7.3963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barbet N.C., Schneider U., Helliwell S.B., Stansfield I., Tuite M.F., Hall M.N. TOR controls translation initiation and early G1 progression in yeast. Mol. Boil. Cell. 1996;7:25–42. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Thomas G., Hall M.N. TOR signalling and control of cell growth. Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. 1997;9:782–787. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80078-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Parzych K.R., Klionsky D.J. An Overview of Autophagy: Morphology, Mechanism, and Regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014;20:460–473. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ohsumi Y. Historical Landmarks of Autophagy Research. Cell Res. 2014;24:9–23. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kawamata T., Kamada Y., Suzuki K., Kuboshima N., Akimatsu H., Ota S., Ohsumi M., Ohsumi Y. Characterization of a novel autophagy-specific gene, ATG29. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;338:1884–1889. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kiel J.A.K.W. Autophagy in unicellular eukaryotes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Boil. Sci. 2010;365:819–830. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu E.Y., Ryan K.M. Autophagy and cancer-issues we need to digest. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:2349–2358. doi: 10.1242/jcs.093708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brachmann C.B., Davies A., Cost G.J., Caputo E., Li J., Hieter P., Boeke J.D. Designer deletion strains derived fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 1998;14:115–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<115::AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Noda T., Matsuura A., Wada Y., Ohsumi Y. Novel System for Monitoring Autophagy in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995;210:126–132. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bicknell A.A., Tourtellotte J., Niwa M. Late Phase of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Pathway Is Regulated by Hog1 MAP Kinase*. J. Boil. Chem. 2010;285:17545–17555. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.084681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Noda T., Klionsky D.J. The Quantitative Pho8delta60 Assay of Nonspecific Autophagy. Methods Enzymol. 2018;451:33–42. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03203-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kramer M.H., Farré J.-C., Mitra K., Yu M.K., Ono K., Demchak B., Licon K., Flagg M., Balakrishnan R., Cherry J.M., et al. Active Interaction Mapping Reveals the Hierarchical Organization of Autophagy. Mol. Cell. 2017;65:761–774. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Suzuki K., Kirisako T., Kamada Y., Mizushima N., Noda T., Ohsumi Y. The pre-autophagosomal structure organized by concerted functions of APG genes is essential for autophagosome formation. EMBO J. 2001;20:5971–5981. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rueden C.T., Schindelin J., Hiner M.C., DeZonia B.E., Walter A.E., Arena E.T., Eliceiri K.W. Imagej2: Imagej for the Next Generation of Scientific Image Data. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18:529. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Neklesa T.K., Davis R.W. Superoxide anions regulate TORC1 and its ability to bind Fpr1:rapamycin complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:15166–15171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807712105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Robinson K.M., Janes M.S., Pehar M., Monette J.S., Ross M.F., Hagen T.M., Murphy M.P., Beckman J.S. Selective fluorescent imaging of superoxide in vivo using ethidium-based probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:15038–15043. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601945103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Murakami C., Kaeberlein M. Quantifying Yeast Chronological Life Span by Outgrowth of Aged Cells. J. Vis. Exp. 2009 doi: 10.3791/1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kirisako T., Ichimura Y., Okada H., Kabeya Y., Mizushima N., Yoshimori T., Ohsumi M., Takao T., Noda T., Ohsumi Y. The Reversible Modification Regulates the Membrane-Binding State of Apg8/Aut7 Essential for Autophagy and the Cytoplasm to Vacuole Targeting Pathway. J. Cell Boil. 2000;151:263–276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.2.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Matsuura A., Tsukada M., Wada Y., Ohsumi Y. Apg1p, a novel protein kinase required for the autophagic process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1997;192:245–250. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00084-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.An Z., Tassa A., Thomas C., Zhong R., Xiao G., Fotedar R., Tu B.P., Klionsky D.J., Levine B. Autophagy Is Required for G(1)/G(0) Quiescence in Response to Nitrogen Starvation in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Autophagy. 2014;10:1702–1711. doi: 10.4161/auto.32122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rallis C., Codlin S., Bahler J. TORC1 signaling inhibition by rapamycin and caffeine affect lifespan, global gene expression, and cell proliferation of fission yeast. Aging Cell. 2013;12:563–573. doi: 10.1111/acel.12080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Evans S.K., Burgess K.E., Gray J.V. Recovery from Rapamycin: Drug-Insensitive Activity of Yeast Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (Torc1) Supports Residual Proliferation That Dilutes Rapamycin among Progeny Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:26554–26565. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.589754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dikicioglu D., Eke E.D., Eraslan S., Oliver S.G., Kirdar B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapted to grow in the presence of low-dose rapamycin exhibit altered amino acid metabolism. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018;16:85. doi: 10.1186/s12964-018-0298-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Morgan J.T., Fink G.R., Bartel D.P. Excised linear introns regulate growth in yeast. Nature. 2019;565:606–611. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0828-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Thoreen C.C., Kang S.A., Chang J.W., Liu Q., Zhang J., Gao Y., Reichling L.J., Sim T., Sabatini D.M., Gray N.S. An ATP-competitive Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Reveals Rapamycin-resistant Functions of mTORC1. J. Boil. Chem. 2009;284:8023–8032. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900301200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Feldman M.E., Apsel B., Uotila A., Loewith R., Knight Z.A., Ruggero D., Shokat K.M. Active-site inhibitors of mTOR target rapamycin-resistant outputs of mTORC1 and mTORC2. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gray J.V., Petsko G.A., Johnston G.C., Ringe D., Singer R.A., Werner-Washburne M. “Sleeping Beauty”: Quiescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae†. Microbiol. Mol. Boil. Rev. 2004;68:187–206. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.187-206.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Krause S.A., Gray J.V. The protein kinase C pathway is required for viability in quiescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Boil. 2002;12:588–593. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00760-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Adachi A., Koizumi M., Ohsumi Y. Autophagy induction under carbon starvation conditions is negatively regulated by carbon catabolite repression. J. Boil. Chem. 2017;292:19905–19918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.817510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kayikci Ö., Nielsen J. Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15 doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Scherz-Shouval R., Shvets E., Fass E., Shorer H., Gil L., Elazar Z. Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J. 2007;26:1749–1760. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee J., Giordano S., Zhang J. Autophagy, Mitochondria and Oxidative Stress: Cross-Talk and Redox Signalling. Biochem. J. 2011;441:523–540. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pérez-Pérez M.E., Zaffagnini M., Marchand C.H., Crespo J.L., Lemaire S.D. The yeast autophagy protease Atg4 is regulated by thioredoxin. Autophagy. 2014;10:1953–1964. doi: 10.4161/auto.34396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jing H., Liu H., Zhang L., Gao J., Song H., Tan X. Ethanol induces autophagy regulated by mitochondrial ROS in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;28:1982–1991. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1806.06014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Horie T., Kawamata T., Matsunami M., Ohsumi Y. Recycling of iron via autophagy is critical for the transition from glycolytic to respiratory growth. J. Boil. Chem. 2017;292:8533–8543. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.762963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Iwama R., Ohsumi Y. Analysis of autophagy activated during changes in carbon source availability in yeast cells. J. Boil. Chem. 2019;294:5590–5603. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.