Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Feb 13;10:2513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59363-y

C-phycocyanin attenuates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in vitro through inhibiting ROS levels, NFATc1 and NF-κB activation

Mohammed S AlQranei 1,2, Hanan Aljohani 1,3, Sunipa Majumdar 1, Linda T Senbanjo 1, Meenakshi A Chellaiah 1,
PMCID: PMC7018981  PMID: 32054921

Abstract

Excessive bone loss occurs in inflammatory disorders such as periodontitis and osteoporosis. The underlying mechanism is related to the differentiation of macrophages into multinucleated giant osteoclasts and their bone resorptive activity. C-Phycocyanin (C-PC) is a phycobiliprotein extracted from the blue-green algae, which has been shown to have various pharmacological effects. The role of C-PC on bone metabolism needs revelation. In this study, we determined the effectiveness of C-PC as an inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation, activity, and survival in vitro. We found that C-PC strongly inhibited the differentiation of macrophages to TRAP-positive osteoclasts, distinctive osteoclast specific podosomal organization, and dentine matrix resorption without any cytotoxicity. Also, it suppressed the expression of osteoclast specific markers, such as cathepsin K and integrin β3 at mRNA and protein levels. RANKL mediated signaling utilizes reactive oxygen species (ROS) for the differentiation of osteoclasts. C-PC attenuated RANKL stimulated ROS. Mechanistic studies indicate that C-PC has the potential to reduce osteoclast formation via blocking the degradation of cytosolic IκB-α and hence, the activation of downstream markers such as c-Fos and NFATc1. However, it does not have any effect on osteoblast-mediated bone formation in vitro. Collectively, our data suggest that C-PC may be utilized as a therapeutic agent that can target bone loss mediated by excessive osteoclastic bone resorption without affecting osteoblastic activity in bone.

Subject terms: Cell biology, Cell death, Cell signalling, Cytoskeleton

Introduction

Bone remodeling is a physiologically orchestrated process in which a simultaneous interplay between bone resorption and bone formation facilitates the development and maintenance of the skeletal tissues. However, an abnormal increased or decreased bone resorption rate is involved in the pathophysiology of multiple skeletal disorders1,2. Osteolytic diseases, such as osteoporosis and periodontitis, carry a serious health concern. The net outcome of such pathological conditions is the loss of healthy and supportive bone due to the activation of osteoclasts3,4.

Osteoclasts are multinucleated-giant cells that are functionally recognized as primary bone-resorbing cells. Osteoclasts express tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), which is considered as one of the biomarkers. Osteoclasts are highly migratory cells, and their migration is dependent on rapid changes in their actin cytoskeletal structures. Osteoclasts do not have the focal adhesion attachment structures typical of other cells5. Osteoclasts plated on glass coverslips demonstrated discrete dot-like podosome structures at the periphery, and, in some cells, podosomes were observed as ring-like structures6,7. These types of podosomal or actin-ring like structures represent the unique characteristics that can demarcate the mature osteoclasts from osteoclast precursors. Osteoclasts are highly migrated cells and dependent on podosomes for their cellular motility6,8,9.

The central regulators of osteoclasts differentiation are two cytokines, namely receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)10,11. M-CSF is a prerequisite for the proliferation and survival of monocytic lineage cells. It also promotes the differentiation of bone marrow precursors to osteoclast precursors and increases the expression of RANK in bone marrow cells10,12. RANKL, which is also called the osteoclast differentiation factor (ODF), is the essential cytokine needed for the induction of mononuclear cell fusion to form the multinucleated osteoclasts10,13. Upon binding of RANKL to RANK, a series of downstream signaling is activated, including the activation of the NF-κB pathway. This activation invokes the stimulation of c-Fos, which consequently activates the nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1), a master regulator of osteoclastogenesis11,14,15. Therefore, targeting such a signaling pathway may restrain the differentiation of osteoclasts, which could present an effective treatment strategy for osteolytic inflammatory diseases.

C-Phycocyanin (C-PC) is a phycobiliprotein found primarily in the blue-green algae such as Spirulina platensis. This water-soluble protein pigment has been often used as a nutritional dietary supplement in many countries16,17. It exhibited several pharmacological effects, including reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging actions, anti-oxidant18, hepatoprotective17, and anti-arthritic19. Furthermore, C-PC has shown anti-inflammatory effects in several experimental models, in vitro and in vivo1922. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 activity has been reported as one of the significant anti-inflammatory effects of C-PC23. Later, C-PC has demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. It interferes with the degradation of the cytosolic IκB-α after lipopolysaccharide stimulation, which consequently suppresses the activation of the NF-κB pathway24. However, the C-PC effect on osteoclast differentiation and resorption activity is not well understood and needs elucidation.

In this paper, we report the potential inhibitory effect of C-PC on the formation of osteoclasts from RAW 264.7 (henceforth denoted as RAW cells) murine macrophages. C-PC decreased osteoclastogenesis in RANKL-stimulated RAW cells by blocking the degradation of cytosolic IκB-α and hence, the activation of downstream markers such as c-Fos and NFATc1. C-PC also attenuates RANKL-mediated intracellular ROS generation. However, it does not affect the differentiation or function of osteoblasts. These data suggest an anti-osteoclastogenic role of C-PC that can be utilized to prevent inflammatory bone loss.

Results

C-Phycocyanin (C-PC) inhibits RANKL-induced differentiation of osteoclasts from RAW 264.7 cells

Osteoclasts are the only bone cells resorb bone. RANKL-RANK-mediated signaling mechanisms are essential for osteoclast differentiation10. First, we evaluated the ability of C-Phycocyanin (C-PC) to inhibit osteoclast differentiation from RAW cells. The cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT assay in cells treated with varying concentrations of C-PC (Supplementary Fig. S1). Results demonstrated a non-toxic nature of C-PC up to a concentration of 100 µg/ml of medium, and significant cytotoxicity was observed at the concentration of 150 µg/ml. Therefore, we used C-PC at the concentration of 25 or 50 µg/ml in the results shown below.

The enzyme tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) is expressed by osteoclasts and has been used as a histochemical marker for mature osteoclast and their precursors. In our studies, we used the TRAP staining method to demonstrate the effect of different doses of C-PC (10, 25, and 50 µg/ml) on osteoclast differentiation. Hence, RAW cells treated with both RANKL and different doses of C-PC for 72 hours were subjected to TRAP staining (Fig. 1A). RAW cells treated with RANKL alone were used as controls (Fig. 1A; 0 µg/ml). C-PC decreased the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1A, 10–50 µg/ml). Since mononuclear macrophages also express TRAP enzyme25, undifferentiated RAW cells were also stained in C-PC treated cells at all doses. TRAP-positive mature multinucleated osteoclasts were counted and provided in a graph (Fig. 1B). The highest decrease of osteoclast number was found at 50 µg/ml of C-PC (Fig. 1A,B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Analysis of the effect of C-PC on RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation. (A) Effect of different doses of C-PC (10, 25, and 50 µg) on osteoclast differentiation. Phase-contrast microscopy images of TRAP stained osteoclasts are shown at indicated doses. Magnification is 4X. (B) The number of TRAP +ve multinucleated osteoclasts were counted in osteoclasts untreated (0) or treated with 10, 25, and 50µg C-PC for 72 h. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the dose-dependent inhibitory effect of C-PC on osteoclasts differentiation as compared with control untreated (0) cells. (C) Identification of the time-dependent effect of RANKL and C-PC on the osteoclast differentiation. The diagrammatic sketch demonstrates the treatment strategy of RAW cells with RANKL and C-PC (25 µg/ml). (D) Representative images of TRAP stained osteoclasts in response to the treatment strategy shown in panel C.TRAP stained osteoclasts in panels a,c,e, and g were taken with 4X objective (magnification: X40), while panels in b,d,f, and h were taken with 10X objective (magnification: X100). (E) The number of TRAP +ve multinucleated osteoclasts were counted in all treatment groups. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the number in the treatment groups to the control group. One-way ANOVA was applied, and values were expressed as mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001.

To further define the stage at which C-PC inhibits osteoclastogenesis, RAW cells were treated with C-PC, as shown in the diagrammatic sketch (Fig. 1C) and as described in the methods section. After the treatments, as indicated in Fig. 1C, cells were stained for TRAP enzyme to determine the inhibitory effect of C-PC on osteoclast differentiation in vitro. Cells were photographed in a Cytation 5 cell imaging multimodel plate reader under 4X (Fig. 1D- panels a, c, e, and g) and 10X (Fig. 1D- panels b, d, f, and h) objectives. We show here that the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts was significantly reduced in the early (Fig. 1D, panels c and d) and early + late groups (panels g and h). However, the addition of C-PC after 48 h of RANKL treatment (late group) had no significant inhibitory effect on osteoclast formation (Fig. 1D, panels e and f). The number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts in the late group is comparable to the control group (Fig. 1D, panels a and b). A quantitative analysis of the number of TRAP +ve osteoclasts is provided in Fig. 1E. Mature TRAP +ve osteoclasts were counted in ~4 to 5 fields/treatment from three different experiments and provided as a graph (n = 3) (Fig. 1E). These results demonstrate that C-PC inhibits the early stage of differentiation of osteoclasts from RAW cells. Therefore, we used the strategy of early-stage inhibition (0–24 h) in the studies shown below.

Immunoblotting analysis of apoptosis and osteoclast markers in RAW cells treated with C-PC

We then performed immunoblotting analysis with a caspase −3 and −9 antibody to identify whether the decrease in osteoclast number by C-PC treatment is due to apoptosis. Immunoblotting analysis demonstrated no changes in the levels of inactive pro-enzymes known as uncleaved caspases, which are indicated as full in Fig. 2A. Similarly, no changes in the levels of cleaved caspases (−3 and −9) were observed, and also minimal levels of these proteins were observed in untreated, and C-PC treated osteoclasts (Fig. 2A). C-PC did not have any effect on the cleavage of either caspase-3 or caspase-9. Minimal levels of cleaved enzymes indicate that apoptotic pathways are not stimulated. This is corroborated in RAW cells stained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) stain (Fig. 2B, 10–50 μg). Although DAPI staining is not the primary marker to evaluate apoptosis, we used this method to determine the nuclear morphology. No significant changes in the nuclear morphology were observed in C-PC untreated and treated cells. No changes in caspase (−3 and −9) levels suggest that the decrease in the number of mature osteoclasts in C-PC treated RAW cells is not due to the activation of apoptosis-related mechanisms.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Analysis of the effect of C-PC on the expression of apoptotic markers and osteoclast-specific markers. (A) Immunoblotting analyses with antibodies to full caspase-3 (~35 kDa), cleaved caspase-3 (~19 kDa), full caspase-9 (~49 kDa), cleaved caspase-9 (~39 kDa), and GAPDH (loading control; ~37 kDa) are shown. *Indicates non-specific band in lane 1 and 4. (B) Evaluation of apoptosis by DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining in osteoclasts untreated or treated with C-PC in the presence of RANKL. Representative phase-contrast micrographs are shown. Magnification is X100. (C) Analysis of the effect of C-PC on the expression of osteoclast-specific markers at the mRNA level by RT-PCR analysis and at the protein level by immunoblotting analysis with indicated antibody. RT-PCR analyses for Cathepsin K (400 bp), integrin β3 (305 bp), TRAP (220 bp), and GAPDH (loading control; 324 bp) are shown in (lanes 1–3). A parallel batch of cell culture was used for the lysate preparation and immunoblotting analyses (lanes 4–6) with antibodies to cathepsin K (~29 kDa), integrin β3 (~97 kDa), TRAP (~42 kDa), and GAPDH (loading control; ~37 kDa). Equal loading was assessed by sequential blotting of the same membrane with cathepsin K and TRAP antibody after stripping. Similarly, equal loading was assessed in β3 integrin blot by sequential immunoblotting with a GAPDH antibody after stripping. Results shown represent one of the three experiments performed with similar results. Scanned uncropped autoradiograms are presented in Supplementary Figs. S3S5. The rectangle in each image represents the corresponding protein(s) shown in the immunoblotting analysis of Fig. 2.

Active osteoclasts are characterized by the expression of TRAP, Cathepsin K, and integrin αvβ3. These are expressed in RANKL dependent manner26. Integrin-mediated signaling is required for osteoclast adhesion27. Therefore, to further validate the inhibitory effect of C-PC, we analyzed the expression levels of specific molecular markers (Cathepsin K, integrin β3, and TRAP) of osteoclast differentiation at mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2C, lanes 1–6). Expression levels of cathepsin K and integrin β3 decreased at mRNA levels in a dose-dependent manner in C-PC treated osteoclasts (Fig. 2C, lanes 1–3). This corresponds with a decrease in the protein levels of respective proteins (Fig. 2C, lanes 5 and 6). No significant changes in the expression TRAP was observed at mRNA and protein levels in untreated (Fig. 2C, lanes 1 and 4) or C-PC treated cells (lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6). These results suggest that integrin signaling plays a crucial role in RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation.

Analysis of the distribution of podosomes and resorption activity in raw cells treated with C-PC

Integrin αvβ3 is critical for osteoclast adhesion and migration, and αvβ3 signaling regulates the formation of podosomes in osteoclasts28. Furthermore, the transformation from mononuclear cells into a multinucleated osteoclast is noticeable cytoskeletally by the formation of podosomes, which is also essential for osteoclast migration and bone resorption29. The organization of actin filaments was determined by staining of osteoclasts with rhodamine-phalloidin (Fig. 3). Raw cells not treated with C-PC but treated with RANKL differentiated into mature osteoclasts with peripheral belts of podosomes. The presence of belt-like podosomes at the periphery is a sign of fully mature osteoclasts (Fig. 3, panels A and a). We have shown here the presence of TRAP stained RAW cells at doses of 25 and 50 μg of C-PC (Fig. 1A). Actin staining also demonstrated the presence of numerous round, flattened, and elongated RAW cells (Fig. 3, panels B, b, and c). Actin distribution was observed in the plasma membrane of these cells (Fig. 3B). Magnified images of round and elongated RAW cells are shown in Fig. 3 (panels b and c). As shown by others in primary human macrophages30, some RAW cells demonstrated actin-rich podosomes throughout the cells (Fig. 3, panel b). Flattened elongated cells demonstrated filopodia-like extensions from the periphery of the membrane (Fig. 3, panel c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of the effect of C-PC on osteoclast-specific phenotype, function, and markers. (A,B) Actin staining of osteoclasts with rhodamine-phalloidine: RAW cells were seeded on coverslips and treated with and without C-PC (50 μg) in the presence of RANKL. After 72 hours, cells in both groups were fixed and stained for rhodamine-phalloidine. Pictures on the right side (a–c) represent magnified areas indicated in (A,B). (C,D) Analysis of the resorption activity in osteoclasts treated with and without C-PC (50 μg) in the presence of RANKL. Representative phase-contrast micrographs are shown. The rectangle in panels (C,D) represents the area of the image, which is magnified in C’ and D’. Magnifications are X100 (C,D) and X400 (C’ and D’). Arrows in D’ point to shallow pits. (EI) Evaluate the effect of C-PC on the changes in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels using dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA) assay method. Representative images of ROS (+) cells during RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis are shown. Varying doses of C-PC (25, 50) μg reduces the green fluorescence intensity. Staining represents the extent of ROS generation. (I) Quantification of the number of ROS (+) cells in all groups is provided in the graph. C-PC reduced ROS levels induced by RANKL. One-way ANOVA was applied, and values were expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01.

Furthermore, C-PC reduced the resorption activity significantly in osteoclasts plated on dentine slices (Fig. 3D,D’), and only a few shallow pits were observed on the dentine matrix (Fig. 3D’, indicated by arrows). However, C-PC untreated cells (−) demonstrated multiple overlapping resorption pits (Fig. 3C,C’). These observations suggest that C-PC attenuates the differentiation of RAW cells into mature osteoclasts, and C-PC treated cells have features of macrophages, which failed to resorb the dentine matrix.

C-PC attenuates the generation of RANKL-induced ROS

From the results shown in Fig. 2, we identified that apoptosis is not a mechanism for the reduced differentiation of osteoclasts in C-PC treated cells (Fig. 2). To further evaluate the effect of C-PC on osteoclastogenesis, we semi-quantitatively measured the changes in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels using dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA) assay method (Fig. 3E–H). We show here that the fluorescence intensity observed in osteoclasts generated with RANKL (Fig. 3, panel F) is significantly reduced in cells treated with C-PC in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3, panels G and H). The bar graph shows the quantification of relative fluorescence intensity in RANKL only, and RANKL + C-PC treated cells (25 and 50 μg) from three different experiments (Fig. 3, panel I). RAW cells not stimulated with any treatment were used as a negative control to detect the basal level of ROS (Fig. 3E; (−) in Fig. 3I). ROS components are essential in the regulation of differentiation of osteoclasts. ROS produced at more than one subcellular site of macrophages was shown to regulate osteoclast differentiation31. Our results show that reactive oxygen species have a role in osteoclastogenesis. Future studies will focus on the subcellular target site of C-PC in RAW cells.

C-PC suppressed the activation of NFATc1 and c-Fos

In order to identify the underlying mechanism for the inhibitory effect of C-PC on the differentiation of osteoclasts, we investigated the expression levels of NFATc1, c-Fos, and IκB-α. NFATc1 was shown as a master regulator of osteoclastogenesis. The activation of NFATc1 by RANKL occurs via the signaling pathway mediated by the NF-κB and c-Fos32. Accordingly, RAW cells were treated with RANKL or RANKL + C-PC (50 μg/ml) for 0, 1, 2, and 3 days. Immunoblotting analysis was performed to determine the protein levels of c-Fos (Fig. 4A), NFATc1 (Fig. 4B), and IκB-α. (Fig. 4C). The expression of c-Fos and NFATc1 was more on day 1 and then decreased gradually on days 2 and 3 in RAW cells treated with RANKL (Fig. 4A,B; lanes 2–4). C-PC reduced significantly the RANKL-induced expression levels of NFATc1 and c-Fos (Fig. 4A,B, lanes 6–8) below the basal levels observed in RAW cells not treated with RANKL (Fig. 4A,B; lane 1). Treatment of cells with 50 μg/ml C-PC demonstrated a compelling decrease in the expression of both NFATc1 and c-Fos at indicated time points. The decrease was maximal at day1 (lanes 6 in A and B) as compared with the corresponding C-PC untreated control (lane 2 in A and B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Immunoblotting analysis of the effect of C-PC on the expression levels of c-Fos (A), NFATc1 (B), and IκB-α (C). (AC) An equal amount of lysate proteins were used for immunoblotting analyses with antibodies to c-Fos (~62 kDa), NFATc1 (~90 kDa), and IκB-α (~39 kDa) to detect the expression at protein levels. (D) RT-PCR analyses were done to evaluate the C-PC effect on the expression of NFATc1 (350 bp) and c-Fos (350 bp) at the mRNA level. Analyses were done in osteoclasts treated with P-CP for 1day. Each experiment was repeated three times and obtained comparable results. Scanned uncropped autoradiograms are presented in Supplementary Figs. S6S9. Corresponding immunoblots are shown in (AC).

We then determined the expression levels of NFATc1 and c-Fos on day 1 by RT-PCR analysis. We chose day 1 because a significant increase in NFATc1 and c-Fos was observed at this time point in response to RANKL (Fig. 4A,B; lane 2), and that increase was significantly reduced by C-PC treatment (Fig. 4A,B, lane 6). There were no changes in the levels of mRNA of NFATc1 and c-Fos was observed in both groups (Fig. 4D), which indicates that the expressions are not transcriptionally regulated.

Others showed that C-PC attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-κB activation by preventing cytosolic degradation of IκBα24. Therefore, we tested whether a similar mechanism exists in RAW cells treated with RANKL and whether C-PC is capable of inhibiting RANKL-induced IκB-α degradation. Since the level of IκBα was very low and not seen on day 1 in our preliminary studies, we used lower time points (5–30 min) to determine the expression levels of IκB-α (Fig. 4C). We observed a time-dependent decrease in IκBα expression in RANKL alone treated cells, which indicates a gradual degradation of IκB-α (Fig. 4C, lanes 2–4). No degradation of IκB-α was detected in all-time points tested for the C-PC/RANKL treated groups. The level of IκB-α was equal to the basal level observed in RANKL and RANKL/C-PC untreated cells at 0 min (Fig. 4C, lanes 1 and 5). Taken together, these results suggest that C-PC inhibits RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis by blocking the NF-κB signaling and, hence, attenuate the expression of the downstream proteins NFATc1 and c-Fos at the early stage of osteoclast differentiation.

C-PC enhanced apoptosis of mature osteoclasts

We have shown in Fig. 2, that there are no changes in the levels of caspases-3 and -9 in cells treated with C-PC at the early stage of differentiation. To determine whether a similar effect occurs in the later stage, mature osteoclasts were cultured in the absence or presence of 50 μg/ml C-PC for 12 hours. Then, osteoclasts were stained for TRAP, and a representative micrograph of untreated (Fig. 5A) and C-PC treated (Fig. 5B) osteoclasts is shown. C-PC treated mature osteoclasts demonstrated reduced viability (Fig. 5B) as compared with untreated osteoclasts (Fig. 5A). The percent survival is decreased considerably in C-PC treated osteoclasts (Fig. 5C). Immunoblotting analysis revealed that a decrease in the survival might be due to the activation of caspase-3 and, to a lesser extent, by caspase-9 in response to C-PC (Fig. 5D). The characteristic morphological changes in osteoclasts (dying osteoclasts) and the activation of caspase-3 suggest that C-PC induces apoptosis in mature osteoclasts and not at the early stage of differentiation (Figs. 1 and 2).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Apoptotic effects of C-PC on mature osteoclasts. Terminally- differentiated osteoclasts were treated with RANKL (A) or RANKL + 50 μg C-PC for 12 hours. (B) Cells were then fixed and stained for TRAP. Asterisks indicate osteoclasts that are undergoing apoptosis. (C) TRAP-stained osteoclasts (survived) were quantitated, and statistical analysis was performed. *P < 0.05, t-test was applied. (D) Immunoblotting analyses were done with indicated antibodies to determine the protein levels of apoptotic markers: full caspase-3 (~35 kDa), cleaved caspase-3 (~19 kDa), full caspase-9 (~49 kDa), and cleaved caspase-9 (~39 kDa). Equal loading was assessed by immunoblotting with a GAPDH (~37 kDa) antibody. Scanned uncropped autoradiograms are presented in Supplementary Fig. S10. The rectangle in each image represents the corresponding protein(s) shown in the immunoblotting analysis of (Panel D).

C-PC did not affect the differentiation and function of osteoblasts

Bone remodeling relies on the coordinated action between osteoblasts and osteoclasts1. We sought to determine whether C-PC has any effect on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization processes mediated by mature osteoblasts. Mineralization was assessed by Alizarin Red staining (Supplementary Fig. S2). A rat osteosarcoma cell line (UMR 106 cells) was used, and cells were grown in osteogenic medium (OM) containing ascorbic acid, and β-glycerophosphate for 7 days. Some cultures were treated with 50 μg/ml of C-PC for 7 days in the presence of OM (OM/C-PC). UMR cells grown in the medium with no osteogenic factors failed to demonstrate the formation of minerals and hence did not stain in red by Alizarin Red staining ((−) in Supplementary Fig. S2). Cells grown in OM or OM/C-PC did not show any significant differences in the activity of the ALP or mineralization process (A and B in Supplementary Fig. S2). Taken together, our observations suggest that C-PC may reduce NF-κB signaling and, therefore, reducing the levels of NFATc1 and c-Fos, which resulted in an anti-clastogenic effect. C-PC had no effect on osteoblast differentiation or activity (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Schematic illustration of the C-PC inhibitory mechanism on RANKL-induced osteoclast formation. NF-κB can act as an upstream factor and mediate RANKL-induced c-Fos and NFATc1 expression. C-PC significantly reduces RANKL-induced NF-κB activation, which therefore reflects not only on the induction of c-Fos and NFATc1 but also on osteoclastogenesis.

Discussion

Bone resorption is a significant consequence of inflammatory osteolytic diseases. The increased differentiation and activity of the resorption-competent osteoclasts represent the essential mechanism underlying osteolysis33. Osteoclast differentiation is regulated by RANKL/RANK signaling10. In the present study, our data showed that C-PC efficiently suppressed RANKL- induced osteoclastogenesis in vitro. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the effect of C-PC on bone metabolism. At the molecular level, C-PC significantly suppresses multiple pathways downstream to RANK, including NF-κB, ROS, NFATc1, and c-Fos.

In this study, the potential anti-osteoclastogenic effect of C-PC was explored on the murine macrophages cell line, RAW 264.7 cells. RANKL and M-CSF are the primary cytokines responsible for osteoclastogenesis11. After exposure to these cytokines, osteoclasts are differentiated following a multi-step process, including a proliferation of the hematopoietic-derived mononuclear precursors, TRAP expression, and fusion of cells. The TRAP+ve multinucleated cells are capable of inducing bone resorption34. Based on these theories, a dose-dependent decrease in the number of TRAP+ve osteoclasts suggests a direct inhibitory effect of C-PC on the RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. This assay is considered the primary tool to investigate whether a non-cytotoxic compound has an anti-osteoclastogenic activity or not3537.

Moreover, we tested the effect of C-PC during several time points throughout the differentiation process. Our results showed that there is no difference between the (early) and (early + late groups) in terms of a decrease in the number of osteoclasts. However, the (late) group was comparable to the control, which suggests that C-PC may work exclusively in the early phases of osteoclastogenesis.

Podosomes are small adhesion structures that mainly found in highly motile cells38. Mature osteoclasts are distinctly characterized by the presence of a well-defined actin belt formed by podosomal organization39,40. In this study, we demonstrated the ability of C-PC to inhibit the formation of mature osteoclasts and hence, the formation of the peripheral belt of these podosomal structures. The presence of small diffuse podosomes structures instead of a well-defined peripheral belt illustrates an abundance of macrophages or mononuclear precursors41 in C-PC treated cells. These cells failed to form mature resorption-competent osteoclasts.

Moreover, we tested the ability of C-PC to attenuate the resorptive activity of mature osteoclasts by seeding osteoclasts on the dentin chips. RANKL treated cells demonstrated well-demarcated trails of the resorbed area, indicating the process of resorption with cell motility. Cell motility is due to the formation of podosomes. However, C-PC treated osteoclasts failed to exhibit any evidence of resorption or motility. It is also known that the extent of bone resorption is strongly linked with the survival rate of osteoclasts. C-PC accelerated the apoptosis of mature osteoclasts by activation of caspase-3. From these results, it is clear that C-PC inhibits the differentiation, survival, and function of mature osteoclasts.

ROS was generated during cellular stresses, and some of the ROS products include hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radicals42. The exposure to RANKL can markedly elevate ROS levels during osteoclastogenesis43,44. Most importantly, ROS production can increase Ca2+ signaling and activate NFATc145. Furthermore, C-PC has known to be a potent ROS scavenger18. In agreement with these observations, our results demonstrated the ability of C-PC to attenuate RANKL-induced generation of ROS. Therefore, the reduction of intracellular ROS levels caused by C-PC could account for the inhibited osteoclast differentiation. No suppressive effect of C-PC was observed on osteoblast differentiation or mineralization, indicating the specificity of this compound on osteoclastogenesis and resorption.

Accumulating evidence suggests that c-Fos and NFATc1 are essential regulators of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis4648. c-Fos is a significant component of the AP-1 complex, and it was shown that c-Fos-deficient mice developed osteopetrosis due to impaired osteoclastogenesis48,49. That effect was ultimately rescued to normal by ectopic expression of c-Fos49. NFATc1, which is critical for osteoclastogenesis, is regulated by c-Fos. The binding of the AP-1 transcription factor, which contains c-Fos, with the NFATc1 promoter, induces NFATc1 expression during osteoclastogenesis4648. In addition, Costunolide, a sesquiterpene lactone, has shown the ability to suppress the transcriptional activity of c-Fos caused by RANKL and, therefore, inhibited the consequent expression of NFATc150. The absence of NFATc1 in RAW 264.7 cells completely abolished RANKL osteoclastogenesis51. Also, mice deficient in NFATc1 exhibited defects in osteoclast differentiation and demonstrated symptoms of osteopetrosis52. Similarly, the inhibition of NFATc1 transcriptional activity attenuated RANKL osteoclastogenesis53,54. In the present study, we showed that C-PC significantly inhibited RANKL-induced c-Fos expression at the protein level. Consequently, RANKL-induced NFATc1 expression is also suppressed.

The canonical NF-κB signaling pathway is vital for osteoclastogenesis in response to RANKL52. NF-κB is constitutively present in the cytoplasm as a heterodimer that maintained its resting state by binding to the inhibitory subunit IκB-α55. RANKL treatment can induce the disintegration of IκB-α and therefore allows NF-κB unit to translocate into the nucleus and activates transcription56. Moreover, NF-κB can act as an upstream factor and mediate RANKL-induced c-Fos and NFATc1 expression57. In line with these observations, our study showed that C-PC treatment prevents the RANKL-induced degradation of IκB-α at all time points tested, indicating the ability of C-PC to counteract the RANKL activation of NF-κB, c-Fos, and NFATc1. Moreover, it is essential to mention that NF-κB was shown to control the early phase of osteoclast differentiation57. Therefore, we believe that early treatment of C-PC suppressed osteoclastogenesis by inhibiting NF-κB related pathway, while the late treatment does not affect. The limitations of the studies shown here are that the actual target site for ROS production is not revealed and also the mechanism by which C-PC acts as an inhibitor of the NF-κB pathway, which involves NFATc1 and c-Fos. Future studies will focus on these aspects.

The study in this report focuses on the effect of C-PC on RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation (Fig. 6; schematic diagram). C-PC effect on differentiation was primarily measured by TRAP staining. A decrease in the expression of osteoclasts-specific markers such as cathepsin K and integrin β3 corresponds with the reduced number of TRAP+ve osteoclasts. C-PC significantly reduces RANKL-induced ROS generation. The underlying molecular mechanism of C-PC effect involves the inhibition of RANKL- induced NF-κB activation, which consequently reflects on the induction of c-Fos and NFATc1 (Fig. 6; schematic diagram). Our results clearly show that C-PC has inhibitory effects on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis via the suppression of NFATc1 and c-Fos activation. Hence, we suggest that C-PC could be a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of bone loss observed in conditions that demonstrate osteoclast activation (E.g., osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and periodontitis). The significance of this compound is that it does not affect osteoblast differentiation or activity.

Methods

Purchases and reagents

The RAW 264.7 cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC® TIB-71™). C-PC was bought from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), dissolved in sterile water and stored at 4 °C. MTT assay kit, Alkaline phosphatase staining kit, and GAPDH antibody were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The following antibodies were bought from the company indicated in parenthesis: NFATc1 (SC-16657; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Santa Cruz, CA), TRAP and CTSK (ab191406, ab19027; Abcam; Cambridge, United Kingdome), β3 Integrin, Caspase-3, caspase-9, c-Fos, and IκB-α (4702, 9662, 9504 S, 4384 S, 4814 S; Cell Signaling Technology; Danvers, MA), and HRP conjugated (mouse or rabbit) secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Santa Cruz, CA). Protein estimation reagents, molecular weight standards for proteins, and PAGE reagents were bought from Bio-Rad. Alizarin red solution was bought from Life-line Cell Technology (CM-0058; Fredrick, MD). Super Signal™ West Pico Chemiluminescent substrate was bought from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, Massachusetts). Rhodamine phalloidin and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Studies on osteoclasts

Preparation of osteoclast precursors from RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cell line

Murine osteoclasts were generated from RAW 264.7 cells as described58. Briefly, RAW 264.7 cells were plated at a low density in the presence of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, the media was changed to α-MEM containing macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF; 10 ng/ml) and GST-RANKL (60 ng/ml) with or without the various concentration of C-PC (10,25, or 50 μg/ml). After two days, the medium was replaced with fresh M-CSF and RANKL with or without C-PC at indicated concentrations above. Recombinant GST-RANKL was purified as described previously39. Mature multinucleated osteoclasts were seen from day three onwards.

To further define the stage at which C-PC inhibits osteoclastogenesis, RAW cells were treated with C-PC at different stages. The treatment conditions are denoted as ‘Early, Late, and Early/Late’ (illustrated in Fig. 1C). The treatment strategy is as follows: In the control treatment, RAW cells were treated with RANKL for 72 h. RANKL was added three times to RAW cell culture at 24 h interval (0 h, 24 h, and 48 h). Incubation was continued for 72 h, and osteoclasts were seen at ~72 h after treatment with RANKL. In the ‘early’ treatment, RANKL and C-PC were added to RAW cell culture at 0 h, and incubation was continued for 24 h. After 24 h, cells were washed with cold PBS, and medium with RANKL was added at 24 h and 48 h intervals with no C-PC. Incubation was continued for 72 h. In the ‘late’ treatment, RANKL was added to RAW cells at 0 h, and 24 h, and the incubations were continued for 48 h. At 48 h, cells were washed, and the medium containing both RANKL and C-PC was added, and incubation continued for 72 h. In the ‘Early/Late treatment’ strategy, the addition of both RANKL and C-PC was done at 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h. RANKL and C-PC were present in the culture for 72 h.

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-staining

RAW 264.7 cells were used to generate osteoclasts as indicated above, in the presence or absence of various concentrations of C-PC. Undifferentiated macrophages were gently removed with cell stripper solution, and multinucleated cells were stained for TRAP. Briefly, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then washed three times with Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS). TRAP staining was done with Leukocyte Acid Phosphatase Kit (Sigma; 387-A) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Stained cells were photographed with phase-contrast microscopy, and images were processed in Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc.).

MTT assay

MTT colorimetric assay analyzes the number of viable cells by the cleavage of tetrazolium salts added to the culture medium. MSM toxicity was assayed by measuring blue formazan formed from the 3-(4-5-dimethlthiazol-2-yl) 2-5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) salt by the cleavage of mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzyme (Sigma) as described previously59. RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at a density of 10000 cells/well in a 24-well flat-bottomed microtiter plate one day before the application of any treatment. Cells were incubated for 48 hours at various concentrations of C-PC. MTT was added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. MTT solubilization solution provided by the manufacturer was added to the wells to stop the chemical reaction, and the plate was read at 570 nm as per instructions provided by the manufacturer (Sigma). Three to four wells were used for each treatment. Statistical significance was measured as described below.

Analysis of DAPI staining

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded on a 6-well plate at a density of 0.07 × 106 and left overnight to attach. After 24 hours, cells were treated with C-PC (0, 10, 25, or 50 μg) for 48 hours. The cells were washed three times with PBS and then treated for 15 min with Triton X-100 to disrupt the cell membrane integrity. Nuclei were stained with a mounting solution containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingham, CA) at 37 C for 10 min in the dark. The cell nuclei were observed and photographed using fluorescence microscopy.

Semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in a 6-well plate. Cells were treated with RANKL and M-CSF in the presence or absence of various concentrations of C-PC for several time points as indicated in the study. Cells treated with only RANKL and M-CSF were used as controls. Qiagen RNeasy mini kit was used to extract RNA according to the manufacturer protocol, and cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript ® III First-strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with two µg of total RNA. To determine the mRNA levels of β3 integrin, CTSK, TRAP, and GAPDH, we used the following steps for PCR reaction60,61: 5 minutes at 95 °C, 30 cycles of (30 s, 94 °C; 30 s, 58 °C; 30 s, 72 °C), 5 min at 72 °C. For c-Fos and NFATc162, we used the following steps for PCR reaction: 32 cycles of (1 min, 94 °C; 1 min, 58 °C; 1 min, 72 °C). After amplification, the PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel, stained with GelGreen ™, and visualized by G-box63,64. Primers are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primers used for the RT-PCR.

Gene Forward primer Reverse primer ~Amplicon length
β3 integrin CCTTTGCCCAGCCTTCCA GTCCCCACAGTTACATTG 305
CTSK TTAATTTGGGAGAAAAACCT AGCCGCCTCCACAGCCATAAT 400
TRAP AGCAGCCAAGGAGGACTACGTT TCGTTGATGTCGCACAGAGG 220
GAPDH CCCACTAACATCAAATGGGG ATCCACAGTCTTCTGGGTGG 324
c-Fos ATGGGCTCTCCTGTCAACAC GGCTGCCAAAATAAACTCCA 350
NFATc1 TGCTCCTCCTCCTGCTGCTC CGTCTTCCACCTCCACGTCG 350

Rhodamine-phalloidine staining of actin filaments in osteoclasts

Osteoclasts were generated from RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cell line as described above. For staining, RAW 264.7 cells were plated on glass coverslips, and differentiation was done as described above with M-CSF and RANKL with and without 50 μg/ml C-PC. Mature multinucleated osteoclasts were seen from day three onwards. Undifferentiated RAW cells were gently removed with cell stripper solution (Sigma), and actin staining was performed as previously described65,66. Briefly, cells were rinsed with PBS containing 5 mM EGTA (PBS-EGTA) and fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS-EGTA for 20 min at 37 °C. Coverslips were immersed in 47.5% ethanol containing 5 mM EGTA for 15 min at room temperature and rinsed with several changes of PBS-EGTA before staining with 1:100 dilution of rhodamine-phalloidin in PBS-EGTA for overnight at 4 °C. After rinsing several times with PBS-EGTA, coverslips were mounted on a mounting solution (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingham, CA). Actin stained osteoclasts were photographed with a Bio-Rad confocal lasers-scanning microscope. Images were stored in TIF image format and processed by Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA).

Resorption assay

Terminally differentiated osteoclasts were collected and replated on dentin slices for 72 hours. Cells were treated twice with RANKL in the presence or absence of 50 μg/ml C-PC. Resorption assay was performed as described previously6,28.

ROS

The DCFDA detection assay kit (2′,7′–dichlorofluorescein diacetate, also known as DCFH- DA), was used to detect intracellular ROS levels. ROS measurement assay was done as described35. Briefly, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with RANKL, M-CSF, and C-PC (25 or 50 μg) for 72 h. Intracellular ROS levels were determined using 2′,7′–dichlorofluorescein diacetate, which oxidizes into fluorescent DCF in the presence of ROS. Cells were washed in a buffer provided with the kit and incubated in the dark for 45 min with 10 μM DCFH-DA. Images were obtained using a fluorescence microscope.

Immunoblotting analysis

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in a 6-well plate. Cells were treated with RANKL and M-CSF in the presence or absence of various concentrations of C-PC for several time points, as indicated in the study. Cells treated with only RANKL and M-CSF were used as controls. The cells were lysed with 1X Radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA) with a protease inhibitor and scraped with a cell scraper. Lysates were kept on the ice for 15 minutes and then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined using Bradford assay. An equal amount of lysate proteins were used for analyzed by SDS-PAGE (10% gel) and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) microporous membrane. Membranes were blocked for 2 hours in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS with tween-20 (PBS-T) and incubated with the primary antibody of interest in PBS-T at the recommended dilution by the manufactures at 4 °C for overnight (ON). Membranes were washed three times with PBS-T and then incubated with species-specific HRP-conjugated secondary antibody in PBS-T at the recommended dilution by the manufactures at RT for 1 h. Immunoblotting with a GAPDH antibody (1:5000 dilution in PBS-T) was used as a loading control. After three washes for 5–10 min each, protein bands were visualized by chemiluminescence, an ECL kit67,68.

Studies on osteoblasts

Alizarin red staining

Alizarin Red staining staining was done as described previously69. Briefly, UMR106 cells were seeded at a density of 4 × 105 cells/well in a 6-well plate with and without C-PC (50 μg/ml) and incubated for 7 days. Cells grown in the osteogenic medium were used as a positive control. Cells were washed with PBS three times and fixed with absolute ethanol for 30 min at room temperature to evaluate the effect of C-PC on matrix mineralization. After aspiration of ethanol, 2% Alizarin red stain solution was added to each well until the cells were covered completely and incubated at room temperature for 45 min in the dark. Subsequently, wells were washed with deionized water three times to remove unincorporated excess dye. The plates were then scanned with the EPSON Perfection V200 Photo scanner. Magnified pictures of the wells were taken using phase-contrast microscopy and images were captured using a Nikon digital camera using 10X objective.

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay

ALP activity assay was performed according to the manufacturer instructions and, as previously described69. Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 4 × 105 cells/well in a 6-well plate in the presence or absence of C-PC (50 μg/ml) for 7 days. Cells were washed with cold PBS three times and lysed with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 0.1% Triton-X100, 1 mM MgCl2, 100 mM glycine). Lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 RPM for 5 min. An equal amount of supernatant protein was used as triplicates in a 96-well plate to measure the activity. P-Nitrophenyl phosphate (10 µl; Sigma) was added to each well, and the absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader (Cytation3 image reader) with software (Gen5 version 2.09).

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data are all expressed as mean ± SD, and statistical significance was determined using one - way ANOVA or Student T-test when applicable (Graph Pad Inc, San Diego, CA). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a research grant from NIH -NIAMS (5R01AR066044) to M.C. and a student support funding from the University of Maryland, School of Dentistry. This work was also supported by the progress and development award to MA from Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University - College of Dentistry through the Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission (SACM).

Author contributions

M.A. and M.C. designed the experiments and wrote the main manuscript. M.A. executed most of the experiments and analyzed the data. S.M. trained M.A. in the preparation of osteoclasts. L.S. did the confocal scanning of osteoclasts stained for actin. H.A. carried out the analyses with osteoblasts. M.C. also analyzed the results with M.A. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-59363-y.

References

  • 1.Väänänen K. Mechanism of osteoclast mediated bone resorption - Rationale for the design of new therapeutics. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2005;57:959–971. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gough A, et al. Osteoclastic activation is the principal mechanism leading to secondary osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 1998;25:1282–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tella SH, Gallagher JC. Biological agents in management of osteoporosis. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014;70:1291–301. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1735-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hajishengallis George. Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2014;15(1):30–44. doi: 10.1038/nri3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abercrombie M. The Croonian Lecture, 1978 - The crawling movement of metazoan cells. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B. Biol. Sci. 1980;207:129–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chellaiah M, et al. Gelsolin Deficiency Blocks Podosome Assembly and Produces Increased Bone Mass and Strength. J. Cell Biol. 2000;148:665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.4.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Destaing O, Saltel F, Géminard J-C, Jurdic P, Bard F. Podosomes Display Actin Turnover and Dynamic Self-Organization in Osteoclasts Expressing Actin-Green Fluorescent Protein. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003;14:407–416. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kanehisa J, Heersche JNM. Osteoclastic bone resorption: In vitro analysis of the rate of resorption and migration of individual osteoclasts. Bone. 1988;9:73–79. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(88)90106-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kanehisa J, et al. A band of F-actin containing podosomes is involved in bone resorption by osteoclasts. Bone. 1990;11:287–293. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(90)90082-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature01658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asagiri M, Takayanagi H. The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone. 2007;40:251–264. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sambandam Y, et al. Microarray profile of gene expression during osteoclast differentiation in modelled microgravity. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010;111:1179–87. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim W-S, et al. Transglutaminase 2 regulates osteoclast differentiation via a Blimp1-dependent pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11246-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Udagawa N, et al. Osteoblasts/stromal cells stimulate osteoclast activation through expression of osteoclast differentiation factor/RANKL but not macrophage colony-stimulating factor: receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand. Bone. 1999;25:517–23. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Teitelbaum SL. Bone Resorption by Osteoclasts. Science (80-.). 2000;289:1504–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kay RA, Barton LL. Microalgae as food and supplement. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1991;30:555–73. doi: 10.1080/10408399109527556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vadiraja BB, Gaikwad NW, Madyastha KM. Hepatoprotective effect of C-phycocyanin: protection for carbon tetrachloride and R-(+)-pulegone-mediated hepatotoxicty in rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998;249:428–31. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bhat VB, Madyastha KM. C-phycocyanin: a potent peroxyl radical scavenger in vivo and in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000;275:20–5. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Remirez D, et al. Effect of phycocyanin in zymosan-induced arthritis in mice - Phycocyanin as an antiarthritic compound. Drug Dev. Res. 1999;48:70–75. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2299(199910)48:2&#x0003c;70::AID-DDR4&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Romay C, Ledón N, González R. Effects of phycocyanin extract on prostaglandin E2 levels in mouse ear inflammation test. Arzneimittelforschung. 2000;50:1106–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Romay C, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of C-phycocyanin from blue-green algae. Inflamm. Res. 1998;47:36–41. doi: 10.1007/s000110050256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Romay C, Delgado R, Remirez D, González R, Rojas A. Effects of phycocyanin extract on tumor necrosis factor-alpha and nitrite levels in serum of mice treated with endotoxin. Arzneimittelforschung. 2001;51:733–6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reddy CM, et al. Selective Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase-2 by C-Phycocyanin, a Biliprotein from Spirulina platensis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000;277:599–603. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cherng S-C, Cheng S-N, Tarn A, Chou T-C. Anti-inflammatory activity of c-phycocyanin in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Life Sci. 2007;81:1431–5. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hayman A. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and the osteoclast/immune cell dichotomy. Autoimmunity. 2008;41:218–223. doi: 10.1080/08916930701694667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grigoriadis AE, et al. Directed differentiation of hematopoietic precursors and functional osteoclasts from human ES and iPS cells. Blood. 2010;115:2769–2776. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-234690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chellaiah MA, Hruska KA. The Integrin αvβ3 and CD44 Regulate the Actions of Osteopontin on Osteoclast Motility. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2003;72:197–205. doi: 10.1007/s00223-002-1025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chellaiah MA, et al. Rho-A Is Critical for Osteoclast Podosome Organization, Motility, and Bone Resorption. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:11993–12002. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.16.11993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Soysa NS, Alles N. Osteoclast function and bone-resorbing activity: An overview. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;476:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Linder S, Hüfner K, Wintergerst U, Aepfelbacher M. Microtubule-dependent formation of podosomal adhesion structures in primary human macrophages. J. Cell Sci. 2000;113 Pt 23:4165–76. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.23.4165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Srinivasan S, et al. Role of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in osteoclast differentiation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010;1192:245–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05377.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Takayanagi H. New insights into osteoclastogenic signaling mechanisms. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;23:582–90. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zaidi M. Skeletal remodeling in health and disease. Nat. Med. 2007;13:791–801. doi: 10.1038/nm1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Suda T. A New Member of Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Family, ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL, Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;256:449–455. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Niu C, et al. Nardosinone Suppresses RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis and Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Alveolar Bone Resorption. Front. Pharmacol. 2017;8:626. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim MH, Shim KS, Kim SH. Inhibitory effect of obovatol on osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2014;33:457–462. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-0316-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tan Z, et al. Neohesperidin suppresses osteoclast differentiation, bone resorption and ovariectomised-induced osteoporosis in mice. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017;439:369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gimona M, Buccione R, Courtneidge SA, Linder S. Assembly and biological role of podosomes and invadopodia. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008;20:235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ma T, Sadashivaiah K, Chellaiah MA, Chellaiah MA. Regulation of Sealing Ring Formation by L-plastin and Cortactin in Osteoclasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:29911–29924. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.099697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wilson SR, Peters C, Saftig P, Brömme D. Cathepsin K Activity-dependent Regulation of Osteoclast Actin Ring Formation and Bone Resorption. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:2584–2592. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805280200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Linder S, Wiesner C. Tools of the trade: podosomes as multipurpose organelles of monocytic cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015;72:121–135. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1731-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Simon H-U, Haj-Yehia A, Levi-Schaffer F. Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction. APOPTOSIS. 2000;5:415–418. doi: 10.1023/A:1009616228304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Song D, et al. Cistanche deserticola polysaccharide attenuates osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption via inhibiting RANKL signaling and reactive oxygen species production. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018;233:9674–9684. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yip KH, et al. Thapsigargin Modulates Osteoclastogenesis Through the Regulation of RANKL-Induced Signaling Pathways and Reactive Oxygen Species Production. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:1462–1471. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ha H, et al. Reactive oxygen species mediate RANK signaling in osteoclasts. Exp. Cell Res. 2004;301:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ishida A, Fujita N, Kitazawa R, Tsuruo T. Transforming Growth Factor-β Induces Expression of Receptor Activator of NF-κB Ligand in Vascular Endothelial Cells Derived from Bone. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:26217–26224. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111093200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Takayanagi H, et al. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev. Cell. 2002;3:889–901. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00369-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang Z-Q, et al. Bone and haematopoietic defects in mice lacking c-fos. Nature. 1992;360:741–745. doi: 10.1038/360741a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grigoriadis A, et al. c-Fos: a key regulator of osteoclast-macrophage lineage determination and bone remodeling. Science (80-.). 1994;266:443–448. doi: 10.1126/science.7939685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cheon Y-H, et al. Costunolide Inhibits Osteoclast Differentiation by Suppressing c-Fos Transcriptional Activity. Phyther. Res. 2014;28:586–592. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hirotani H, Tuohy NA, Woo J-T, Stern PH, Clipstone NA. The Calcineurin/Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells Signaling Pathway Regulates Osteoclastogenesis in RAW264.7 Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:13984–13992. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M213067200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Winslow MM, et al. Calcineurin/NFAT Signaling in Osteoblasts Regulates Bone Mass. Dev. Cell. 2006;10:771–782. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim K, Kim JH, Youn BU, Jin HM, Kim N. Pim-1 Regulates RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis via NF-κB Activation and NFATc1 Induction. J. Immunol. 2010;185:7460–7466. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim JH, et al. RCANs regulate the convergent roles of NFATc1 in bone homeostasis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:38526. doi: 10.1038/srep38526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sun Z, Andersson R. NF-kappaB activation and inhibition: a review. Shock. 2002;18:99–106. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200208000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ea C-K, Sun L, Inoue J-I, Chen ZJ. TIFA activates I B kinase (IKK) by promoting oligomerization and ubiquitination of TRAF6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004;101:15318–15323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404132101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yamashita T, et al. NF-κB p50 and p52 Regulate Receptor Activator of NF-κB Ligand (RANKL) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced Osteoclast Precursor Differentiation by Activating c-Fos and NFATc1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:18245–18253. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610701200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gupta A, et al. Leupaxin Is a Critical Adaptor Protein in the Adhesion Zone of the Osteoclast. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2003;18:669–685. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Majumdar S, et al. Engineering of L-Plastin Peptide-Loaded Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Sustained Delivery and Suppression of Osteoclast Function In Vitro. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2019;2019:6943986. doi: 10.1155/2019/6943986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cuetara BLV, Crotti TN, O’donoghue AJ, Mchugh KP. Cloning And Characterization Of Osteoclast Precursors From The Raw264.7 Cell Line. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. - Anim. 2006;42:182. doi: 10.1290/0510075.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mohanan S, Horibata S, McElwee JL, Dannenberg AJ, Coonrod SA. Identification of Macrophage Extracellular Trap-Like Structures in Mammary Gland Adipose Tissue: A Preliminary Study. Front. Immunol. 2013;4:67. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kim J-H, et al. The effects of Lycii Radicis Cortex on RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and activation in RAW 264.7 cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;37:649–58. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gupta A, Cao W, Chellaiah MA. Integrin αvβ3 and CD44 pathways in metastatic prostate cancer cells support osteoclastogenesis via a Runx2/Smad 5/receptor activator of NF-κB ligand signaling axis. Mol. Cancer. 2012;11:66. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-11-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Senbanjo LT, AlJohani H, Majumdar S, Chellaiah MA. Characterization of CD44 intracellular domain interaction with RUNX2 in PC3 human prostate cancer cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019;17:80. doi: 10.1186/s12964-019-0395-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chellaiah M, Fitzgerald C, Alvarez U, Hruska K. c-Src is required for stimulation of gelsolin-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:11908–16. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.19.11908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chellaiah MA, Ma T, Majumdar S. L-plastin phosphorylation regulates the early phase of sealing ring formation by actin bundling process in mouse osteoclasts. Exp. Cell Res. 2018;372:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chellaiah M, Hruska K. Osteopontin stimulates gelsolin-associated phosphoinositide levels and phosphatidylinositol triphosphate-hydroxyl kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1996;7:743–53. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.5.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chellaiah MA, et al. Osteopontin deficiency produces osteoclast dysfunction due to reduced CD44 surface expression. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003;14:173–89. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-06-0354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chellaiah MA, Majumdar S, Aljohani H. Peptidomimetic inhibitors of L-plastin reduce the resorptive activity of osteoclast but not the bone forming activity of osteoblasts in vitro. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES