Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 2020 Jan 14;148:e6. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819002218

New records and genetic diversity of Mycoplasma ovis in free-ranging deer in Brazil

Marcos Rogério André 1,, José Maurício Barbanti Duarte 2, Luiz Ricardo Gonçalves 1, Ana Beatriz Vieira Sacchi 1, Márcia Mariza Gomes Jusi 1, Rosangela Zacarias Machado 1
PMCID: PMC7019128  PMID: 31933451

Abstract

Cervids represent a mammal group which plays an important role in the maintenance of ecological balance. Recent studies have highlighted the role of these species as reservoirs for several arthropods-borne pathogens. Globally, hemotropic mycoplasmas (haemoplasmas) are emerging or remerging bacteria that attach to red blood cells of several mammals species causing hemolytic anaemia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence and assess the phylogenetic positioning of Mycoplasma ovis in free-ranging deer from Brazil. Using a polymerase chain reaction targeting the 16S rRNA region, 18 (40%) out of 45 sampled deer were positive to M. ovis. Among the nine sequences analysed, four distinct genotypes were identified. The sequences detected in the present study were closely related to sequences previously identified in deer from Brazil and the USA. On the other hand, the Neighbour-Net network analysis showed that the human-associated M. ovis genotypes were related to genotypes detected in sheep and goats. The present study shows, for the first time, the occurrence of M. ovis in Mazama gouazoubira and Mazama bororo deer species, expanding the knowledge on the hosts harbouring this haemoplasma species. Once several deer species have your population in decline, additional studies are needed to evaluate the pathogenicity of M. ovis among deer populations around the world and assess its potential as reservoir hosts to human infections.

Key words: 16S rRNA genotypes, haemoplasmas, Mazama bororo, Mazama gouazoubira

Introduction

Cervids represent a diverse mammal group, containing more than 60 species described [1], playing an important role in the maintenance of ecological balance [2]. Among the eight cervids species occurring in Brazil, Odocoileus virginianus (white-tailed deer), Ozotocerus bezoarticus (pampas deer), Blastocerus dichotomus (marsh deer), Mazama nemorivaga (Amazonian brown brocket), Mazama gouazoubira (gray brocket deer), Mazama nana (Brazilian dwarf brocket), Mazama americana (Red brocket) and Mazama bororo (small red brocket deer) [36], B. dichotomus, M. bororo and M. nana species are classified as vulnerable (IUCN: accessed in 2019 May). Specifically, the B. dichotomus and M. gouazoubira are included in the Brazilian National Action Plan for Conservation of Endangered South America Deer and have your population in decline, mainly because of habitat destruction and hunting (https://www.iucnredlist.org).

Hemotropic mycoplasmas (haemoplasmas) belong to Mollicutes Class and Mycoplasmataceae Family [7]. These agents are epierythrocytic bacteria that attach to red blood cells from a wide variety of mammals, including humans [814]. Although haemoplasma infection generally shows chronic and subclinical courses, affected mammals can develop hemolytic anaemia, mainly when immunosuppressed [1517].

Mycoplasma ovis, a zoonotic pathogen frequently detected in sheep and goats [18 19], have been detected in O. virginianus [20, 21] and Rangifer tarandus species [22] kept in captivity in the USA and in free-ranging Cervus nippon species in Japan [23]. In Brazil, M. ovis has already been detected in free-ranging B. dichotomus and O. bezoarticus from three distinct Brazilian areas, namely Pantanal (state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Midwestern Brazil), Emas National Park (state of Goiás state, Midwestern Brazil) and Paraná river basin (São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil) [24]. Additionally, M. ovis DNA was detected in blood samples from M. nana, M. americana and B. dichotomus species maintained in captivity at Bela Vista Biological Sanctuary (Paraná state, Southern Brazil) [25].

The present study aimed to investigate the occurrence and assess the genetic diversity of M. ovis in free-ranging deer sampled in four Brazilian states.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

Deer blood sampling was conducted by Professor José Maurício Barbanti Duarte (IBAMA Registration number 263703), from the Department of Animal Sciences, FCAV – UNESP, Jaboticabal, with license number 10636-1 provided by IBAMA, between 1996 and 2011.

Number and origin of sampled deer

In total 34 and 11 DNA samples were extracted from Mazama spp. and Ozotoceros bezoarticus buffy coats samples, respectively. Among these animals, 21 M. gouazoubira and 11 O. bezoarticus were captured in the Pantanal Sul Matogrossense (MS); 4 M. gouazoubira in the region of the Serra da Mesa Hydroelectric Power Plant (GO); 4 M. bororo and 2 M. gouazoubira in the Intervales State Park (SP); and 3 M. americana in the Iguaçu National Park (PR) [26].

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from 200 µl of each buffy coat samples using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA concentration and absorbance ratio (260/280 nm) were measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Molecular detection of M. ovis

A previously described conventional (c) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol based on the fragment (~1300 bp) of the 16S rRNA gene was used for detection of M. ovis DNA [24]. Briefly, 5 µl of DNA was used as a template in 25 µl reaction mixtures containing 10X PCR buffer, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 0.6 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTPs) mixture, 1.5U of TaqDNA polymerase (Life Technologies) and 0.5 µM 16S-Fw 5′-ATGCAAGTCGAACGAGTAGA-3′, and 16S-Rv 5′- TGATACTTTCTTTCATAGTTTG-3′ primers. PCR amplifications were performed at 94°C for 5 min followed by 39 repetitive cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 51.6°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Mycoplasma ovis DNA obtained from a naturally infected Brazilian marsh deer [25] and ultra-pure sterile water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Sequencing and analyses of sequences

Randomly selected PCR products were purified using Silica Bead DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Fermentas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Purified amplified DNA fragments from positive samples were submitted to sequence confirmation in an automatic sequencer (ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyser – Applied Byosystem/Perkin Elmer) in both directions. Lastly, in order to correctly determine the nucleotide composition, the electropherograms were submitted to PhredPhrap program [27]. The Phred quality score (peaks around each base call) was established higher than 20 (99% in accuracy of the base call). Subsequently, the sequences were submitted to phylogenetic analyses. The sequences amplified in the present study were deposited in GenBank data base under accession numbers: (MK919446-MK919454).

Phylogenetic analyses

Haemoplasmas-16S rRNA sequences were identified by BLASTn using the Megablast (following default parameters), aligned with sequences available in GenBank using Clustal/W [28] and adjusted in Bioedit v. 7.0.5.3 [29]. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) method. The ML phylogenetic analysis was inferred with RAxML-HPC BlackBox 7.6.3 [30]. The analysis (ML) was performed in CIPRES Science Gateway [31]. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) available on MEGA software was applied to identify the most appropriate model of nucleotide substitution. GTR + G + I model was chosen as the most appropriate for the phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rDNA alignment.

Identification and genetic relationship of M. ovis genotypes

The 16S rRNA aligned sequences amplified in the present study were utilised to identify the number of genotypes, calculate the nucleotide diversity (π), the polymorphic level (genotype diversity – [Gd]) and the average number of nucleotide differences (K) using the DnaSP v5.10 [32]. To investigate the genetic relationship among M. ovis genotypes detected in deer in the present study and those previously detected in sheep, goats and humans and retrieved from GenBank, a Neighbour-Net network was constructed using the pairwise genetic distances with SplitsTree v4.10 [33]. Additionally, the different genotypes identified were submitted to TCS network inferred using the Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees (popART) (v. 1.7) [34].

Results

Occurrence of M. ovis and BLASTn analysis

A total of 18 (40%) out of 45 sampled deer were positive to M. ovis, including 11 brown brocket deer (M. gouazobira) (10 from Mato Grosso do Sul state and one from Goiás state), one small red brocket deer (M. bororo) from São Paulo state, one red brocket deer (M. americana) from Paraná state and five pampas deer (O. bezoarticus) from Mato Grosso do Sul state. The BLASTn analysis performed on nine positive samples randomly selected showed that all sequences amplified in the present study shared 99% identicalness with M. ovis previously detected in deer from Brazil (HQ197746, HQ634377 and HQ634378) and USA (FJ824847). All sequences amplified in the present study showed query coverage of 100%.

Phylogenetic and genotype analyses

The amplified sequences were positioned within the M. suis group and clustered with others M. ovis sequences detected in animals and humans. The sequences detected in the present study were closely related to sequences previously identified in deer from Brazil and the USA, albeit lightly apart from M. ovis genotypes detected in sheep, goats and humans. The ML analysis was supported by high bootstrap values (Fig. 1). In agreement with ML analysis, but with a marked separation among M. ovis sequences identified in sheep, goats, humans and those amplified in deer, the network analysis showed that the M. ovis sequences were divided into four groups. All analysed M. ovis 16S rRNA sequences detected in sheep, goats and humans were clustered into group I. In addition, the groups II, III and IV comprise the M. ovis sequences identified in deer (Fig. 2). Finally, the TCS network showed similar results, since all deer genotypes clustered together and separated from those genotypes detected in sheep, goats and human and identified in different countries (Fig. 3). Besides, the findings are supported by the divergence scores among the different genotypes (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic relationships within the Mycoplasma genus based on 16S rRNA gene (1056 bp). The tree was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) with the GTR + G + I model. The sequences detected in the present study are highlighted in bold. The numbers at the nodes correspond to bootstrap values higher than 60% accessed with 1000 replicates. Mycoplasma pneumoniae (NR113659) was used as outgroup.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Neighbour-Net network inferred using 16S Mycoplasma ovis genotypes detected in different hosts. The goat, sheep and human genotypes were grouped in Group I. Groups II, III and IV refer to deer genotypes.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

TCS network inferred using the 16S Mycoplasma ovis genotypes detected in different hosts. The goat, sheep and human genotypes are highlighted in light blue. The deer genotypes are highlighted in light green.

Table 1.

Divergence scores among the different M. ovis genotypes identified in deer, goats, sheep and human. The genotypes were previously assessed with DnaSP v5.10. The pairwise distance matrix was estimated using the Mega 5.05

Genotypes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1
2 0.002
3 0.003 0.005
4 0.003 0.003 0.004
5 0.013 0.013 0.015 0.010
6 0.014 0.014 0.016 0.011 0.001
7 0.013 0.013 0.015 0.010 0.000 0.001
8 0.015 0.015 0.017 0.013 0.002 0.003 0.002
9 0.016 0.016 0.018 0.014 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.003
10 0.009 0.009 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.013 0.011 0.014 0.014
11 0.014 0.014 0.017 0.013 0.016 0.017 0.016 0.018 0.017 0.008
12 0.008 0.008 0.012 0.007 0.010 0.011 0.010 0.013 0.014 0.005 0.011
13 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.001 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.014 0.015 0.007 0.012 0.008
14 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.002 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.014 0.015 0.008 0.013 0.007 0.003
15 0.014 0.014 0.016 0.012 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.013 0.017 0.011 0.013 0.013
16 0.014 0.014 0.016 0.011 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.013 0.017 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.002
17 0.014 0.014 0.016 0.012 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.013 0.017 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.002 0.002
18 0.015 0.015 0.017 0.013 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.014 0.018 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.003 0.003 0.003

Among the nine sequences detected in the present study, four distinct genotypes were identified (Table 2). The genotype diversity (Gd), nucleotide diversity (per site = π) and the average number of nucleotide differences (K), were 0.694, 0.002 and 2.22, respectively.

Table 2.

Host, sampling sites and identification of the identified genotypes

Genotypes Host Sampling sites Samples GenBank accession numbers
Genotype 1 Pampas deer Mato Grosso do Sul #1 MK919446
#3 MK919450
Genotype 2 Pampas deer Mato Grosso do Sul #10 MK919447
Genotype 3 Brown brocket deer Goiás #196 MK919448
Genotype 4 Brown brocket deer Mato Grosso do Sul #154 MK919449
#180 MK919451
#298 MK919452
#301 MK919453
#302 MK919454

Discussion

Recent studies have suggested a possible co-evolution among haemoplasmas and their respective hosts [11, 21, 35]. However, little is known about the origin, dispersion and evolutionary aspects of hemotropic mycoplasmas [12].

Globally, haemoplasmas comprise emerging or re-emerging zoonotic pathogens that affect domestic and wild animals. Previously, based upon molecular diagnosis, M. ovis was detected in a veterinarian in Texas, USA, which was coinfected with Bartonella henselae [36]. More recently, M. ovis was detected in patients without and with extensive arthropods or animal contact [10]. Although the pathogenicity and reservoirs of M. ovis infecting humans are still unknown, the present study showed, for the first time, that the human-associated M. ovis genotypes were closely related to those detected in goat and sheep. However, further studies are needed in order to assess this issue as well as the transmission routes of this haemoplasma species.

The occurrence of M. ovis detected in the present study (40%) was lower than that previously detected among free-ranging (58%) and captive cervids (87%) from Brazil [24 25]. A high occurrence of M. ovis in deer could be related to the transmission routes involved. Thus, blood-sucking arthropods (ticks and flies), as well as vertical transmission, may play a role in the widespread infection of this haemoplasma species among deer [24].

Interesting, the phylogenetic relationship of the 16S rRNA sequences amplified in the present study showed that the M. ovis genotypes detected in Brazilian deer clustered together and were lightly distant from those detected in goats, sheep and humans, suggests a possible specificity among the different genotypes of M. ovis and their respective vertebrate hosts. In agreement to ML analysis, the networks also confirmed this result and showed clearly that M. ovis detected in goats, sheep and humans are genetic related each other, whereas M. ovis from deer could be classified as a distinct genogroup. However, more studies targeting different genes, analysing additional sequences and verifying other biological aspects are needed.

Although analysing few sequences, a low genetic diversity was observed in M. ovis sequences amplified from Brazilian deer. These results were expected since the 16S rRNA region show low genetic variation. However, it seems like different genotypes circulate in deer populations in the Pantanal region, state of Mato Grosso do Sul state. Two different genotypes were identified circulating on O. bezoarticus from the same region. On the other hand, only one genotype was detected in M. gouazobira individuals caught between 1996 and 2010, suggesting possible maintenance of this genotype over time among deer population in this region.

Among the eight Brazilian deer species, M. ovis has already been detected in four of them, namely B. dichotomus, O. bezoarticus, M. nana and M. americana [24 25]. Additionally, the present study shows, for the first time, the occurrence of M. ovis in M. gouazoubira and M. bororo species. The wide distribution and the number of deer species infected support the role of cervids in the maintenance of M. ovis transmission cycle in the environment. Once several deer species have your population in decline or are classified as vulnerable, additional studies are needed to evaluate the pathogenicity of M. ovis among deer populations from Brazil and around the world, as well as the environmental and biological factors which contribute to deer infection.

Conclusion

The present study shows, for the first time, the occurrence of M. ovis in M. gouazoubira and M. bororo deer species, expanding the knowledge on the hosts harbouring this haemoplasma species. The M. ovis genotypes found in deer in Brazil clustered with other sequences previously detected in cervids, albeit slightly apart from humans, sheep and goats-associated genotypes, suggesting a probable specificity of M. ovis genotypes to groups of vertebrate hosts.

Acknowledgements

MRA is a fellowship researcher sponsored by CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Process 302420/2017-7).

References

  • 1.Wilson DE and Reeder DM (2005) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Duarte JMB et al. (2012) Braga GF, Vogliotti A, Abril VV, Piovezan U, Reis ML, Ramoshgc, Zanetti ES. Plano de Ação Nacional Para a Conservação dos Cervídeos Ameaçados de Extinção. Brasília.
  • 3.Duarte JMB (1996) Guia de identificação de cervídeos brasileiros, 1st Edn. Jaboticabal: FUNEP, 14 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Duarte JMB and Merino ML (1997) Taxonomia e Evolução. In: Biologia e conservação de cervídeos sulamericanos: Blastocerus, Ozotoceros e Mazama. Jaboticabal: FUNEP.
  • 5.Rossi RV (2000) Taxonomia de Mazama Rafinesque, 1817 do Brasil (Artiodactyla, Cervidae) – Brazil (Dissertação). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duarte JMB and Jorge W (2003) Morphologic and cytogenetic description of the small red brocket (Mazama bororo Duarte, 1996) in Brazil. Mammalia 67, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tully JG et al. (1993) Revised Taxonomy of the Class Mollicutes: proposed elevation of a monophyletic cluster of arthropod-associated Mollicutes to ordinal rank (Entomoplasmatales ord. nov.), with provision for familial rank to separate species with nonhelical morphology (Entomoplasmataceae fam. nov.) from helical species (Spiroplasmataceae), and emended descriptions of the Order Mycoplasmatales, Family Mycoplasmataceae. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 43, 378–385. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Willi B et al. (2007) Worldwide occurrence of feline hemoplasma infections in wild felid species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45, 1159–1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.André MR et al. (2011) Hemoplasma in wild canids and felids in Brazil. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 42, 342–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maggi RG et al. (2013) Infection with hemotropic Mycoplasma species in patients with or without extensive arthropod or animals contact. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 51, 3237–3241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bonato L et al. (2015) Occurrence and molecular characterization of Bartonella spp. and hemoplasmas in neotropical primates from Brazilian Amazon. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 42, 15–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gonçalves LR et al. (2015) Diversity and molecular characterization of novel hemoplasmas infecting wild rodents from different Brazilian biomes. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 43, 50–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Sousa KCM et al. (2017) Occurrence and molecular characterization of hemoplasmas in domestic dogs and wild mammmals in a Brazilian wetland. Acta Tropica 171, 172–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ikeda P et al. (2017) Evidence and molecular characterization of Bartonella spp. and hemoplasmas in neotropical bats in Brazil. Epidemiology and Infection 145, 2038–2052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Foley JE et al. (1998) Molecular, clinical, and pathologic comparison of two distinct strains of Haemobartonella felis in domestic cats. American Journal of Veterinary Research 59, 581–1588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Messick J (2003) New perspectives about Hemotrophic mycoplasma (formerly, Haemobartonella and Eperythrozoon species) infections in dogs and cats. The Veterinary Clinics of North American. Small Animal Practice 33, 1453–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Willi B et al. (2010) Haemotropic mycoplasmas of cats and dogs: transmission, diagnosis, prevalence and importance in Europe. Schweizer Archiv FurTierheilkunde 152, 237–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang X et al. (2017) Molecular characterization of hemotropic mycoplasmas (Mycoplasma ovis and ‘Candidatus Mycoplasma haemovis’) in sheep and goats in China. BMC Veterinary Research 13, 142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Machado CAL et al. (2017) Mycoplasma infection in goat farms from northeastern Brazil. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 55, 1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boes KM et al. (2012) Identification of a Mycoplasma ovis-like organism in a herd of farmed white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in rural Indiana. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 41, 77–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maggi RG et al. (2013) Novel hemotropic Mycoplasma species in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 36, 607–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stoffregen WC et al. (2006) Identification of a haemomycoplasma species in anemic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 42, 249–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Watanabe Y et al. (2010) Novel hemoplasma species detected in free-ranging sika deer (Cervus nippon). The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 72, 1527–1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grazziotin AL et al. (2011) Prevalence and molecular characterization of Mycoplasma ovis in selected free-ranging Brazilian deer populations. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 47, 1005–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grazziotin AL et al. (2011) Mycoplasma ovis in captive cervids: prevalence, molecular characterization and phylogeny. Veterinary Microbiology 152, 415–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zanatto DCS et al. (2019) Evidence of exposure to Coxiella burnetii in neotropical free-living cervids in South America. Acta Tropica 197, 105037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ewing B et al. (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer tracer using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Research 8, 175–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thompson JD, Higgins DG and Gibson TJ (1994) Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 4673–4680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hall TA (1999) Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stamatakis A, Hoover P and Rougemont J (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Systematic Biology 57, 758–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Miller MA, Pfeiffer W and Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans LA, pp. 1–8.
  • 32.Librado P and Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25, 1451–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huson DH and Bryant D (2006) Application of networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 254–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leigh JW and Bryant D (2015) POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mascarelli PE et al. (2014) Hemotropic mycoplasmas in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Parasites and Vectors 7, 117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sykes JE et al. (2010) Human coinfection with Bartonella henselae and two hemotropic Mycoplasma Variants resembling Mycoplasma ovis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 48, 3782–3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES